Skip to main content

Table 3 Cultural Importance of woody species

From: Knowledge and valuation of Andean agroforestry species: the role of sex, age, and migration among members of a rural community in Bolivia

 

Cultural Importance

Species

Total

Sex

Age

Migration

 

# part

# cit

# cat

CI

female

male

<20a

20-39b

40-59c

≥60d

no_younga

no_oldb

tempc

permd

BD

40

193

8

4.83

5.05 ± 1.15

4.60 ± 1.39

4.70 ± 1.57

4.70 ± 1.16

4.80 ± 1.23

5.10 ± 1.29

5.00 ± 1.31

4.95 ± 1.23

3.83 ± 1.60

5.17 ± 0.75

BeC

40

122

9

3.05

3.05 ± 1.70

3.05 ± 2.06

2.00 ± 1.63*

2.40 ± 1.35

4.30 ± 1.25*

3.50 ± 2.32

2.75 ± 1.16

3.90 ± 1.86***

1.00 ± 0.89***

2.67 ± 1.75

BuC

40

68

6

1.70

1.35 ± 1.69

2.05 ± 1.76

1.20 ± 1.40

1.30 ± 1.42

2.20 ± 2.15

2.10 ± 1.91

1.75 ± 1.75

2.15 ± 1.98

1.00 ± 1.10

0.83 ± 0.98

CB

40

88

5

2.20

2.25 ± 1.16

2.15 ± 0.99

1.80 ± 0.63

2.30 ± 0.95

2.30 ± 1.42

2.40 ± 1.17

2.00 ± 0.76

2.35 ± 1.27

1.83 ± 0.41

2.33 ± 1.21

EG

38

161

9

4.24

4.30 ± 1.03

4.17 ± 1.34

4.50 ± 1.58

4.40 ± 0.70

4.33 ± 1.00

3.67 ± 1.22

4.88 ± 0.64

4.00 ± 1.14

4.33 ± 1.03

4.00 ± 1.79

GP

36

67

6

1.86

1.81 ± 1.52

1.90 ± 1.21

1.33 ± 1.41*c

1.20 ± 1.03*c

3.25 ± 0.71*a,b

1.89 ± 1.17

1.86 ± 1.35

2.53 ± 1.18*c,d

0.83 ± 0.98*b

1.00 ± 1.10*b

KS

32

98

7

3.06

2.82 ± 1.33

3.33 ± 1.40

2.56 ± 1.24

2.86 ± 1.46

3.86 ± 1.07

3.11 ± 1.54

2.83 ± 1.33

3.44 ± 1.36

2.60 ± 1.34

2.60 ± 1.52

LG

40

145

8

3.63

3.85 ± 1.18

3.40 ± 1.23

3.10 ± 1.20

3.70 ± 1.06

3.80 ± 0.92

3.90 ± 1.60

3.63 ± 1.06

3.85 ± 1.27*

2.33 ± 0.82*

4.17 ± 0.75

MO

39

103

5

2.64

2.58 ± 0.96

2.70 ± 1.03

2.80 ± 0.79

2.00 ± 0.94

3.00 ± 1.05

2.78 ± 0.97

2.38 ± 0.74

2.89 ± 0.99

2.50 ± 1.05

2.33 ± 1.21

PS

39

151

9

3.87

3.45 ± 1.57

4.32 ± 1.42

2.90 ± 1.66

3.70 ± 1.64

4.60 ± 0.97

4.33 ± 1.41

3.63 ± 1.92

4.47 ± 1.17

3.17 ± 1.47

3.00 ± 1.67

PL

40

217

9

5.43

5.90 ± 1.29*

4.95 ± 1.15*

4.80 ± 1.03

5.60 ± 1.35

5.80 ± 1.40

5.50 ± 1.35

6.00 ± 1.51

5.65 ± 1.35

4.33 ± 0.82

5.00 ± 0.00

SP

40

162

9

4.05

3.90 ± 1.48

4.20 ± 1.44

3.40 ± 1.51

3.80 ± 1.48

4.20 ± 1.14

4.80 ± 1.48

3.88 ± 1.81

4.50 ± 1.32

2.67 ± 0.52

4.17 ± 1.33

SM

40

231

9

5.78

5.80 ± 1.70

5.75 ± 1.37

4.50 ± 1.58*c,**d

5.40 ± 1.17

6.40 ± 1.07*a

6.80 ± 1.23**a

5.25 ± 1.16

6.60 ± 1.14**

4.00 ± 1.90**

5.50 ± 0.84

SA

37

100

9

2.70

3.06 ± 1.66

2.37 ± 1.64

2.57 ± 1.72

1.70 ± 0.48

3.20 ± 1.69

3.33 ± 2.06

2.00 ± 1.10

3.25 ± 1.83

2.00 ± 1.22

2.17 ± 1.47

  1. Cultural Importance (CI; arcsine square-root transformed) of 14 selected local woody species in dependence on the participants’ socio-economic background (sex, age, migration). Sex: female (n = 20), male (n = 20). Age: <20 years (n = 10), 20–39 years (n = 10), 40–59 years (n = 10), ≥60 years (n = 10). Migration: no_young (no migration < 40 years, n = 8), no_old (no migration ≥ 40 years, n = 20), temp (temporary migration, n = 6), perm (permanent migration, n = 6). Number of participants (# part). Number of citations (# cit). Number of use-categories (# cat). Data shown: mean values ± standard deviation. Significant differences between groups (a-d) determined by Tukey post-hoc tests. Levels of significance: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Back to article page

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

ISSN: 1746-4269

Contact us