Skip to main content

Table 5 Relationship between two subcategories of Human food use of Euterpe precatoria and E. oleracea (based on palm use-reports) and socioeconomic factors in the 10 Amazonian communities evaluated in Peru and Bolivia

From: The socioeconomic context of the use of Euterpe precatoria Mart. and E. oleracea Mart. in Bolivia and Peru

 

n

PERU

n

BOLIVIA

Euterpe precatoria

Euterpe oleracea

Euterpe precatoria

Euterpe oleracea

Beverages

Food

Beverages

Food

Beverages

Food

Beverages

Food

Comparison of means (categorical variables)

Gender

 Male

152

0.7 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.6

0.02 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.6

79

0.9 ± 0.2

1.1 ± 0.4

0.3 ± 0.5

0.1 ± 0.3

 Female

172

0.7 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.6

0.03 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.5

80

0.9 ± 0.3

1.1 ± 0.4

0.3 ± 0.4

0.1 ± 0.3

Ethnicity

 Indigenous

118

0.4 ± 0.5 b

1.1 ± 0.7

-

0.5 ± 0.1 a

81

0.9 ± 0.3 b

1.2 ± 0.5

0.01 ± 0.1 b

-

 Mestizo

206

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.2 ± 0.5

0.04 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.03 b

78

0.9 ± 0.2 a

1.1 ± 0.2

0.5 ± 0.4 a

0.3 ± 0.4ª

Language spoken

 Only native language

6*

-

1.3 ± 0.8

-

0.5 ± 0.4

12

0.7 ± 0.5 b

0.8 ± 0.6 b

-

-

 Only Spanish

252

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.2 ± 0.4

0.03 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.3 b

73

0.9 ± 0.2 a

1.1 ± 0.2 b

0.5 ± 0.4 a

0.3 ± 0.4 a

 Native language and Spanish

66

0.1 ± 0.2 b

1.2 ± 0.9

-

0.7 ± 0.8 a

74

0.9 ± 0.3 ab

1.2 ± 0.4 a

0.04 ± 0.2 b

0.03 ± 0.2 b

Migration status

 Non-migrant

212

0.6 ± 0.5 b

1.2 ± 0.6

0.01 ± 0.1

0.3 ± 0.6 a

84

0.9 ± 0.3 b

1.2 ± 0.5

0.01 ± 0.1 b

-

 Migrant from other ethnic group in the same ecoregion

108

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.1 ± 0.5

0.04 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.2 b

71

0.9 ± 0.1 a

1.0 ± 0.3

0.5 ± 0.4 a

0.3 ± 0.5

 Migrant from other ecoregion

4*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.3 ± 0.5

0.3 ± 0.5

0.5 ± 1.0

4*

1.0 ± 0.01

1.0 ± 0.0

0.3 ± 0.5

0.3 ± 0.5

Farm animal

 No animals

28

0.7 ± 0.5

1.4 ± 0.5

-

0.2 ± 0.5

7*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

0.4 ± 0.5

0.6 ± 0.5

 Subsistence livestock

294

0.7 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.6

0.02 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.5

145

0.9 ± 0.02

1.9 ± 0.4

0.2 ± 0.4

0.1 ± 0.3

 Commercial livestock

2*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

7*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.4 ± 0.5

0.7 ± 0.5

0.4 ± 0.5

Tools

 Low cost

58

0.3 ± 0.5 b

1.3 ± 0.7

-

0.4 ± 0.6 a

3*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.3 ± 0.6

0.3 ± 0.6

-

 Average cost

239

0.7 ± 0.5 a

1.2 ± 0.5

0.03 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.5 ab

139

0.9 ± 0.2

1.1 ± 0.4

0.2 ± 0.4

0.1 ± 0.3 b

 High cost

27

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.1 ± 0.5

0.04 ± 0.2

0.04 ± 0.2 b

17

0.9 ± 0.3

1.2 ± 0.4

0.5 ± 0.4 a

0.5 ± 0.5 a

Transport

 No transport

88

0.2 ± 0.4 b

1.2 ± 0.1

-

0.5 ± 0.7 a

22

1.0 ± 0.05

1.1 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.4

0.1 ± 0.3 ab

 No fuel consumption

108

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.2 ± 0.5

0.03 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.3 b

53

0.9 ± 0.03

1.0 ± 0.3

0.3 ± 0.5

0.02 ± 0.1 b

 Low fuel consumption

119

0.8 ± 0.4 a

1.2 ± 0.1

0.04 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.3 b

80

0.9 ± 0.03

1.2 ± 0.4

0.3 ± 0.4

0.2 ± 0.4 a

 High fuel consumption

9*

0.7 ± 0.5

1.1 ± 0.2

-

0.7 ± 1.0

4*

1.0 ± 0.1

1.5 ± 0.6

1.0 ± 0.0

1.0 ± 0.0

House construction materials

 Local plant materials ≥50%

274

0.7 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.5

0.02 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.5

146

0.9 ± 0.2

1.1 ± 0.4

0.3 ± 0.4

0.1 ± 0.3

 Mixed material ≥50%

2*

-

2.0 ± 0.0

-

2.0 ± 0.0

4*

1.0 ± 0.0

1.5 ± 0.6

1.0 ± 0.0

0.5 ± 0.6

 Foreign commercial materials ≥50%

48

0.5 ± 0.5

1.1 ± 0.7

0.04 ± 0.3

0.4 ± 0.7

9*

0.8 ± 0.4

0.9 ± 0.6

0.2 ± 0.4

0.2 ± 0.4

Pearson correlation (continuous variables)

 Age

324

0.02

0.1

−0.03

−0.1

159

0.23

−0.09

0.19

0.13

 Size of family (number of children)

324

0

0.21

−0.1

−0.07

159

0.2

0.07

0.33

0.26

 Time in residence (years)

324

−0.01

−0.12

0.01

−0.1

159

−0.02

0.21

−0.27

−0.12

 Education

324

−0.07

0.07

−0.02

0.1

159

0

0

0

0.12

 Farm size (ha)

324

0.05

0.2

0.07

−0.03

159

−0.02

−0.14

0.17

0.2

 House size (m2)

324

0.33

0.16

0.11

−0.15

159

0.02

−0.09

0.02

0.19

  1. Letters (a, b, c) indicate significantly different means based on a MANOVA analysis and its corresponding post hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05), with the levels indicated by different letters showing significant differences. (*) Levels with less than 10 replicas, not included in the analyses