Different divergence processes of isoglosses of folk nomenclature between wild trees and rice landraces imply the need for different conservation planning based on the type of plant resources

Tokuoka, Yoshinori; Seo, Mincheol; Hayakawa, Hiroshi; Yamasaki, Fukuhiro; Kimura, Kenichiro; Takashima, Kenji; Hashigoe, Kiyokazu; Matsui, Hiromitsu; Oka, Mitsunori

doi:10.1186/s13002-024-00675-y

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Table 1 V-measure of spatial association between social, linguistic, and economic maps and plant dialect maps. V-measure, homogeneity, and completeness range from 0 (perfectly different) to 1 (perfectly matched) between paired maps

From: Different divergence processes of isoglosses of folk nomenclature between wild trees and rice landraces imply the need for different conservation planning based on the type of plant resources

Maps tested for association with plant folk nomenclature maps	Plant folk nomenclature maps	V-measure	Homogeneity	Completeness
Current municipality	Trees (2 groups)	0.33	0.94	0.2
	Trees (3 groups)	0.51	0.91	0.35
	Trees (4 groups)	0.53	0.88	0.38
	Trees (5 groups)	0.57	0.83	0.44
	Rice (2 groups)	0.38	0.94	0.24
	Rice (3 groups)	0.51	0.97	0.34
	Rice (4 groups)	0.52	0.93	0.36
	Rice (5 groups)	0.63	0.94	0.48
Folklore (3 groups)	Trees (2 groups)	0.25	0.31	0.21
	Trees (3 groups)	0.39	0.35	0.43
	Trees (4 groups)	0.4	0.34	0.47
	Trees (5 groups)	0.35	0.28	0.47
	Rice (2 groups)	0.69	0.78	0.62
	Rice (3 groups)	0.66	0.62	0.7
	Rice (4 groups)	0.63	0.57	0.7
	Rice (5 groups)	0.53	0.43	0.7
Folklore (4 groups)	Trees (2 groups)	0.29	0.41	0.23
	Trees (3 groups)	0.41	0.41	0.41
	Trees (4 groups)	0.42	0.39	0.45
	Trees (5 groups)	0.37	0.32	0.45
	Rice (2 groups)	0.61	0.79	0.5
	Rice (3 groups)	0.66	0.68	0.63
	Rice (4 groups)	0.65	0.65	0.66
	Rice (5 groups)	0.56	0.49	0.66
Folklore (10 groups)	Trees (2 groups)	0.36	0.8	0.23
	Trees (3 groups)	0.58	0.83	0.45
	Trees (4 groups)	0.63	0.84	0.51
	Trees (5 groups)	0.61	0.72	0.53
	Rice (2 groups)	0.44	0.86	0.29
	Rice (3 groups)	0.59	0.9	0.44
	Rice (4 groups)	0.59	0.84	0.46
	Rice (5 groups)	0.61	0.73	0.52
Accent	Trees (2 groups)	0.29	0.67	0.19
	Trees (3 groups)	0.51	0.75	0.39
	Trees (4 groups)	0.53	0.73	0.42
	Trees (5 groups)	0.54	0.65	0.46
	Rice (2 groups)	0.42	0.85	0.28
	Rice (3 groups)	0.53	0.82	0.39
	Rice (4 groups)	0.56	0.83	0.43
	Rice (5 groups)	0.64	0.79	0.54
Phoneme	Trees (2 groups)	0.21	0.36	0.15
	Trees (3 groups)	0.49	0.58	0.43
	Trees (4 groups)	0.53	0.58	0.48
	Trees (5 groups)	0.52	0.51	0.52
	Rice (2 groups)	0.45	0.7	0.33
	Rice (3 groups)	0.52	0.64	0.44
	Rice (4 groups)	0.5	0.58	0.44
	Rice (5 groups)	0.54	0.54	0.54
Grammar	Trees (2 groups)	0.18	0.34	0.12
	Trees (3 groups)	0.45	0.58	0.37
	Trees (4 groups)	0.48	0.57	0.41
	Trees (5 groups)	0.48	0.52	0.45
	Rice (2 groups)	0.39	0.67	0.27
	Rice (3 groups)	0.46	0.62	0.37
	Rice (4 groups)	0.45	0.57	0.37
	Rice (5 groups)	0.53	0.58	0.49
Agriculture (slash and burn or not)	Trees (2 groups)	0.08	0.07	0.1
	Trees (3 groups)	0.26	0.18	0.45
	Trees (4 groups)	0.24	0.16	0.45
	Trees (5 groups)	0.21	0.13	0.45
	Rice (2 groups)	0.01	0	0.01
	Rice (3 groups)	0.12	0.08	0.19
	Rice (4 groups)	0.11	0.08	0.19
	Rice (5 groups)	0.13	0.08	0.27
Tenryou and the eight domains in the last Tokugawa Shogunate	Trees (2 groups)	0.16	0.36	0.11
	Trees (3 groups)	0.42	0.59	0.33
	Trees (4 groups)	0.42	0.56	0.34
	Trees (5 groups)	0.42	0.49	0.37
	Rice (2 groups)	0.31	0.6	0.21
	Rice (3 groups)	0.39	0.57	0.3
	Rice (4 groups)	0.42	0.58	0.33
	Rice (5 groups)	0.46	0.54	0.41

Back to article page

ISSN: 1746-4269

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com