Skip to main content

Table 2 Cultural significance sub-indices used to calculate the cultural significance index of wild edible mushrooms

From: Variation in traditional knowledge of culturally important macromycete species among three indigenous communities of Oaxaca, Mexico

Sub-indices

Answers

Values

LNI

No name

0

Binomial

2.5

Trinomial

5.0

Tetranomial

7.5

Pentanomial

10

MI

(Amount of mentions/number of interviewees) × 10

 

PAI

Null

0

Rare

2.5

Medium

5.0

Common

7.5

Very common

10

CFI

Never

0

Not every year

2.5

Once a year

5.0

Twice or once a year

7.5

More than twice a year

10

MFFI

No way of preparation (cook)

0

One way of preparation

2.5

Two ways of preparation

5.0

Three ways of preparation

7.5

Four ways of preparation

10

CPI

First, second, third, and fourth place

10–7

Fifth, sixth, and seventh place

6–4

Eight, ninth, and tenth place

3–1

ERI

They do not know

0

By its shape, color, and texture

3.3

By its smell and taste

6.6

By its color, shape, taste, and place of growing

10

EI

They do not sell or buy

0

Rarely sell

3.3

Commonly sell or buy

6.6

Sell at high prices

10

KTI

An immigrant

2.5

Local people, not blood parent

5

Father or mother

7.5

Three or more generations involved

10

  1. Answers from interviewees were classified and a value was assigned to every classification
  2. LNI local nomenclature index, MI mention index, PAI perceived abundance index, CFI consumption frequency index, MFFI multifunctional food index, CPI consumption preference index, ERI edibility recognition index, EI economic index, KTI knowledge transmission index