Table 3 Contributions of the top 10 families (in terms of numbers of species) to different use categories
From: Diversity of wetland plants used traditionally in China: a literature review
Family | ME (%) | FO (%) | ED (%) | GR (%) | FI (%) | ID (%) | OR (%) | PE (%) | EN (%) | LI (%) | OT (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poaceae | 14 (5.3) | 42 (24.3) | 7 (6.9) | 2 (3.8) | 18 (34.6) | 2 (4.2) | 4 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | 13 (54.2) | 4 (18.2) | 6 (40.0) |
Polygonaceae | 32 (12.2) | 11 (6.4) | 11 (10.9) | 1 (1.9) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (29.2) | 1 (3.1) | 12 (46.2) | 1 (4.2) | 5 (22.7) | 1 (6.7) |
Cyperaceae | 17 (6.5) | 19 (11.0) | 3 (3.0) | 1 (1.9) | 15 (28.8) | 1 (2.1) | 2 (6.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (8.3) | 2 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) |
Lamiaceae | 20 (7.6) | 2 (1.2) | 5 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Asteraceae | 13 (4.9) | 6 (3.5) | 7 (6.9) | 2 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.8) | 1 (4.2) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0.0) |
Ranunculaceae | 13 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (19.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Hydrocharitaceae | 3 (1.1) | 12 (6.9) | 3 (3.0) | 7 (13.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Potamogetonaceae | 5 (1.9) | 10 (5.8) | 1 (1.0) | 7 (13.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Fabaceae | 9 (3.4) | 8 (4.6) | 1 (1.0) | 8 (15.1) | 5 (9.6) | 2 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Brassicaceae | 8 (3.0) | 5 (2.9) | 8 (7.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (10.4) | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Total | 134 (51.0) | 115 (66.5) | 47 (46.5) | 28 (52.8) | 38 (73.0) | 29 (60.4) | 9 (28.1) | 19 (73.1) | 21 (87.5) | 12 (54.5) | 7 (46.7) |