|
Indigenous knowledge and traditional management variables
|
Source of variation
|
Degree of freedom
|
Chi-Square
|
P value
|
|---|
|
Motivation to conserve
|
EG
|
4
|
14.49
|
< 0.01
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
0.10
|
0.754
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
13.11
|
< 0.05
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
25
|
164.85
|
< 0.001
|
|
Uses as Food
|
EG
|
4
|
11.37
|
< 0.05
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
5.12
|
< 0.05
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
8.23
|
0.084
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
28
|
157.48
|
< 0.001
|
|
Uses as Soap
|
EG
|
4
|
18.09
|
< 0.01
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
7.30
|
< 0.01
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
5.58
|
0.232
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
16
|
104.24
|
< 0.001
|
|
Uses in Fisheries
|
EG
|
4
|
55.98
|
< 0.001
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
1.87
|
0.172
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
0.89
|
0.926
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
5
|
37.48
|
< 0.001
|
|
Differentiation in fruits traits
|
EG
|
4
|
9.54
|
< 0.05
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
0.30
|
0.586
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
3.03
|
0.553
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
13
|
82.46
|
< 0.001
|
|
Preference in fruits traits
|
EG
|
4
|
31.91
|
< 0.001
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
1.24
|
0.266
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
3.92
|
0.417
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
12
|
39.18
|
< 0.001
|
|
Propagation and Regeneration practices
|
EG
|
4
|
5.84
|
0.212
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
3.93
|
< 0.05
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
11.37
|
< 0.05
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
19
|
77.04
|
< 0.001
|
|
Management Practices to improve production
|
EG
|
4
|
14.21
|
< 0.01
|
| |
GG
|
1
|
7.95
|
< 0.01
|
| |
EG*GG
|
4
|
12.50
|
< 0.05
|
| |
Likelihood ratio
|
32
|
99.78
|
< 0.001
|
- EG: Ethnic group, G: Gender, EG*GG: Interaction between ethnic group and gender group
