From: Exploring differences in stakeholders’ perceptions of illegal bird trapping in Cyprus
Categories | Number of people trapping | Incentives | Equipment (per person) | Numbers of birds trapped/impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enforcement Agency 1 | 1) Traditional trappers | – | Personal consumption | 20–30 limesticks | The large number of low-scale trapping has a significant impact | |
2) Organised criminals | 40–50 people in total (4–5%) | Profit | Maybe 30 mist nets and 500 limesticks | Highest impact, as catching most amount of birds | ||
Enforcement Agency 2 | 1) Non-professionals | – | Personal consumption | – | – | |
2) Professional trappers | 10–15 people in total (within the SBA) | Profit | – | – | ||
Enforcement Agency 3 | 1) Traditional trappers | A lot more than 2000 people in total | Personal consumption/hobby | Limesticks | Catch a limited number of birds as they do not use lures | |
2) Business-scale | Profit | – | – | |||
Environmental NGO 1 | 1) Small-scale trappers | 60–85% | 500 to 1000 in total | Hobby | < 50 limesticks and/or 1 mist net | c. 2 million birds in total |
2) Medium-scale trappers | 10–30% | Supplementary income | 50–100 limesticks and/or 1–3 mist nets | |||
3) Big trappers (professionals) | 5–10% (10–20 people) | Profit | >100 limesticks and/or 4+ mist nets | |||
Environmental NGO 2 | 1) Small-scale trappers | 50–60% | 1500 to 2000 in total | Personal consumption | 25–50 limesticks or 1 mist net and 1 decoy | c. 2 million birds in total |
2) Medium/semi-professional trappers | 30–40% | Personal consumption/ profit Political rather than cultural incentive | 75–100 limesticks, 2–3 mist nets and 2 decoys | |||
3) Professional trappers | 10–20% | Profit | 200 limesticks, more than 5 mist nets |