Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis of deviance of three types of use reports (MUR, OUR, UUR) in response to livelihood, ethnicity, gender, occupation, education, language spoken, and availability of food in generalized linear model fit with Poisson coefficients

From: Cross-cultural comparison of plant use knowledge in Baitadi and Darchula districts, Nepal Himalaya

Explanatory variables (categorical)

Factors

MUR

OUR

UUR

Mean

p

Mean

p

Mean

p

Livelihood

Baitadi/sedentary (suburban, hill) (57)

6.75

< 0.001***

8.92

< 0.001***

2.06

0.99

Darchula/semi-nomadic (rural, mountain) (43)

8.69

2.88

2.04

Access to opportunity

Privileged (Brahmin, Chhetri) (72)

7.40

0.27

7.38

< 0.001***

2.24

0.045*

Underprivileged (Byanshi, Dalit) (28)

8.07

3.60

1.60

Gender

Male (68)

7.59

0.99

6.72

0.023*

2.26

0.49

Female (32)

7.58

5.49

2.36

Occupation

Healers (77)

7.79

0.17

5.83

< 0.001***

1.99

0.79

Non-healer (23)

6.91

7.99

2.02

Languages spoken

≤ 2 (81)

7.46

0.36

6.99

< 0.001***

2.26

0.51

> 2 (19)

8.10

5.72

2.07

Education

Non-literate (51)

7.78

0.47

6.03

0.23

2.09

0.043*

Literate (49)

7.38

6.63

1.78

Food availability

< 6 months (72)

7.51

0.65

6.36

0.84

2.04

0.75

> 6 months (28)

7.78

6.25

2.14

  1. ***Highly significant, **Moderately significant, *Low significant, > 0.05 Non-significant (Ns)