Table 6 Pairwise comparisons of the number of traditional forage plant species reported
From: Changes in traditional ecological knowledge of forage plants in immigrant villages of Ningxia, China
Characters | Mean difference | S.t.d. error | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
Gender (i-j) | |||
“Male”–“Female” | 7.541 | 2.647 | 0.005 |
Age (i-j) | |||
“≥60”–“≤19” | 36.156 | 4.580 | 0.000 |
“≥60”–“20–39” | 8.880 | 3.559 | 0.014 |
“≥60”–“40–59” | 1.526 | 3.463 | 0.660 |
Education level (i-j) | |||
“Illiteracy”–“Primary” | 12.490 | 3.032 | 0.000 |
“Illiteracy”–“Middle” | 9.609 | 3.673 | 0.010 |
“Illiteracy”–“Higher” | 29.911 | 4.981 | 0.000 |
Occupation (i-j) | |||
“Students”–“Village heads” | − 47.333 | 6.829 | 0.000 |
“Students”–“Farmers” | − 26.213 | 4.413 | 0.000 |
“Students”–“businessmen” | − 35.183 | 9.369 | 0.000 |
“Students”–“Migrant workers” | − 20.071 | 6.256 | 0.002 |
“Students”–“Village doctors” | − 28.383 | 9.369 | 0.003 |
“Students”–“Other else” | − 30.155 | 8.223 | 0.000 |