From: Cultural keystone species revisited: are we asking the right questions?
Steps | Procedure | Results |
---|---|---|
Data search | Peer-reviewed paper database search on PoP—Publish or Perish (Harzing, 2007) using key words “cultural keystone species.” | Title, abstract, and keyword information for 473 papers correlated with initial search. |
Data review | Screening the title, abstract, keywords, methods, and publication format to exclude those not relevant to study. | 409 papers aligned with study/search criteria following screening procedure |
Data collection | Downloaded and gained full text access to all that were relevant. | 409 downloaded full text with 18 with no access |
Data refinement | Key word search papers for cultural keystone species using finder option. Additionally, read publications that specifically focus on/test cultural keystone species criteria defined by Turner and Garibaldi (2004) and Cristancho and Vining (2004). | 409 papers were relevant to study criteria. |
Data classification | Systematic classification of the 409 relevant papers using 5 defined criteria (randomly cited, test of theory, mention concept, mention species as cultural keystone, review of the theory/concept) integral to gaining insight on the use/application of cultural keystone species theory. | Dataset of 5 defined criteria for each relevant paper |
Data analysis | Summarize and analyze data. | Citation of theory over time |