Skip to main content

Table 8 Summary of the developed GLM for response and predictor variables on high fuelwood producing plant species at Boset District

From: Prioritization and selection of high fuelwood producing plant species at Boset District, Central Ethiopia: an ethnobotanical approach

List of variables Variable type Correlation coefficient (r) Standard error z-value Pr( >|z|)
Selection of high fuelwood producing plant species at Boset District (intercept) Response 3.08e+00 3.49e−01 8.84  < 2e−16***
Sampled Kebeles at Boset District Predictor 1.57e−01 2.43e−02 6.45 1.1e−10***
Informant’s gender   − 5.74e−02 3.72e−02 − 1.54 0.12
Informant’s age   2.85e−03 1.46e−03 1.96 0.05*
Informant’s wealth class   1.94e−01 1.58e−01 1.23 0.22
Informant’s marriage status   − 1.83e−02 5.82e−02 − 0.32 0.75
Informant’s educational background   − 7.03e−03 9.80e−03 − 0.72 0.47
Informants’ main source of livelihoods   − 3.38e−02 1.23e−02 − 2.74 6.13e−03**
Informants’ years of experience in firewood collection &/or charcoal making   − 2.54e−02 1.30e−02 − 1.96 0.0498*
Informants’ source of energy for cooking, heating and lighting purposes   1.17e−02 4.99e−03 2.34 0.02*
Informants income source generated from firewood collection &/or charcoal making   4.78e−05 1.24e−05 3.85 1.21e−04***
  1. The statistical significance difference between predictor and response variables is illustrated as follows: “***” 0.001, “**” 0.01, “*” 0.05, “.” 0.1, and “ ” 1