Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of importance indicators between a) recent use and use value, b) recent use and frequency of mention and c) frequency of mention and uses per species, all analyzed with a linear regression model (analysis of variance of the regression and correlation)

From: Ecological apparency, ethnobotanical importance and perceptions of population status of wild-growing medicinal plants in a reserve of south-central Mexico

 

Sources

DF

Sum of Square

Mean square

β

F Statistic

P-value

R2

Recent use/Use value

Regression

1

4.5561

4.5561

0.85 p < 0.001

49.4237 (1,50)

5.38E-09

0.497

Residual

50

4.6092

0.0922

    

Total

51

9.1653

0.1797

    

Recent use/Frequency of mentions

Regression

1

1.9987

1.9987

0.93 p < 0.001

38.5292 (1,50)

1.04E-07

0.435

Residual

50

2.5938

0.0519

    

Total

51

4.5925

0.0900

    

Frequency of mentions/Uses per specie

Regression

1

0.9069

0.9069

0.44 p < 0.001

15.7538 (1,50)

2.31E-04

0.2396

Residual

50

2.8784

0.0576

    

Total

51

3.7853

0.0742

    
  1. Recent use: the number of interviewees who used the species in the last year. Uses per species is the number of illnesses for which a species is used