Skip to main content

Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and their utilization by indigenous and local communities of Dugda District, Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants have been used by the people of Dugda District in the primary health care system to treat various livestock ailments for generations, particularly, in underserved rural areas. However, these ethnoveterinary practices and medicinal plants are dwindling without proper documentation, due to undergoing socio-cultural and environmental changes. Hence, this study aimed at inventory and analysis of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and the associated indigenous and local knowledge used in the treatment of livestock health problems in Dugda District.

Methods

Data were collected from 378 local inhabitants through semi-structured interviews, 18 focus group discussions with 6 to 8 participants in each couple with participant field observations. Informant consensus factor (ICF), fidelity-level (FL) and relative importance value (RI) were used to evaluate the agreement of informants on ethnoveterinary practices, healing potential of medicinal plants and the most multipurpose species. Using standard taxonomic procedures, voucher specimens were collected, identified and deposited at the National Herbarium of Addis Ababa University.

Results

In total, 64 medicinal plants of ethnoveterinary uses, belonging to 33 families were reported to treat 37 livestock health problems. Anthrax, inappetence and diarrhoea were said to be the most prevalent veterinary health problems treated by traditional medicinal plants. Family Fabaceae was the most widely reported (7 spp.), followed by Apocynaceae, Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae (5 spp. each). Herbs were the dominant life forms (21spp.), followed by shrubs (20 spp.). The most commonly sought plant parts were leaves (55.25%), followed by roots (23.44%). The principal method of preparation was pounding remedial parts (46.85%) and mixing with cold water. The main route of administration was via oral application (72.67%), drenching diseased livestock. Withania somnifera and Kedrostis foetidissima were the most cited medicinal plants with 53 and 43 use reports (URs), respectively. ICF showed that respiratory diseases scored the highest value (0.94), while most of the reported medicinal plants were gastrointestinal agents. RI value analysis revealed that Croton macrostachyus had highest diversity of uses, followed by K. foetidissima and W. somnifera. Ethnoveterinary uses of some medicinal plants such as Phytolacca dodecandra, Calpurnia aurea, Cyphostemma cyphopetalum and Verbascum sinaiticum as prophylaxis against rabies were a new input for ethnoveterinary database.

Conclusion

The study revealed that the people of the Dugda District are endowed with rich ethnoveterinary knowledge and medicinal plants. However, ethnoveterinary knowledge associated with medicinal plant species significantly differ (P < 0.05) between general and key informants, young and matured age groups and informants’ educational level. This infers the impact of mode of ethnoveterinary knowledge transfer, literacy, modern education and globalization on ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plant species. And also most of the medicinal plants are found in wild habitats with nearly no conservation attention. Therefore, it is imperative to implement participatory conservation actions for medicinal plants in collaboration with traditional institutions (Gada system). The disparity of ethnoveterinary knowledge could be also minimized through awareness creation among local communities about the knowledge and its revitalization. Furthermore, medicinal plants, which are widely utilized and multipurpose, should be screened for their phytochemicals, pharmacological and toxicological activities to confirm ethnoveterinary uses and for future development of veterinary pharmaceuticals.

Introduction

Ethnoveterinary medicine is a complex system of beliefs, knowledge, skills and practices concerning animal husbandry as well as general animal care [1]. Although it mainly focuses on the use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants to treat animal diseases, the practices of ethnoveterinary medicine also include the use of diagnostic procedures, animal husbandry practices and surgical methods [2]. Recently, this system has gained attention for its potential usefulness in contributing to livestock well-being, particularly at the level of primary animal healthcare [3]. In many rural areas of the world, particularly in remote and marginal areas, traditional herbal medicines are crucial to treating domestic animals. This is due to several reasons, including cost-effectiveness, accessibility, efficacy and safety; one remedy for various ailments; and viable alternatives to allopathic drugs [4, 5]. Martin et al. [6] noted that the role of ethnoveterinary medicine in livestock development is beyond dispute.

In traditional societies around the world, particularly in developing countries, a lot of people have a close relationship with livestock. Livestock is an important and integral part of many economies of these nations [7], which span from the social to the economic to the environmental [8]. In Ethiopia, livestock is a vital and basic component of agricultural production. The country is among the leading countries in Africa in livestock population, with 65 million cattle, 40 million sheep, 51 million goats, 8 million camels and 49 million chickens [9]. It contributes up to 40% of agricultural gross domestic product (GDP), nearly 20% of total GDP and 20% of national foreign exchange earnings [10]. Livestock is a major source of animal proteins, food security, transport of goods, export products, manure for household energy and means of wealth accumulation. It also provides draught power and manure for crop cultivation, which improve soil fertility and aid productivity [11, 12].

However, the livestock sector is constrained by many factors, such as rampant livestock diseases that affect livestock productivity, the marketability of their products and economic losses [13, 14]. Livestock diseases negatively affect the income and farming activities of the rural poor, which in turn has implications for the livelihood of the farmers [15, 16]. It remains one of the principal causes of poor livestock performance, leading to an ever-increasing gap between supply and demand for livestock products [17]. The impact is highly manifested in cultures where livestock is equated with wealth [17]. This is directly related to low accessibility to modern livestock health care, veterinarians and the supply of drugs, even if they are accessible but not affordable to the majority of farmers [18]. As a result, medicinal plants are frequently used to treat different livestock diseases, particularly, in areas where modern veterinary services are absent, expensive, inaccessible and scanty [15, 16, 18].

In Ethiopia, Ethnoveterinary service is believed to have been in practice since time immemorial. The diverse ethnolinguistic communities in Ethiopia are very familiar with the therapeutic potential of medicinal plants as ethnoveterinary medicines. Traditional remedies are major sources of therapeutics for nearly 90% of the livestock population in Ethiopia, and of all forms of traditional medicines in the country, 95% are made of medicinal plants [19]. Thus, traditional healers are potentially important first-line health care providers because they often primarily rely on plant remedies to treat livestock ailments with cheap payment or free of charge in the absence of modern veterinary services [20]. This makes ethnoveterinary practices an integral part of primary health care, especially for marginalized and poor communities living in remote rural areas. Interestingly, practice varies from one place to another and dictated by the diverse culture and tradition of the people as well as the vegetation of a particular area [15]. In Ethiopia, ethnoveterinary medicinal plants are used to treat commonly encountered livestock diseases such as anthrax, blackleg, diarrhoea, wounds, bloat, intestinal worms, external parasites and mastitis [14, 21]. Tilahun et al. [21] stated that the predominant medicinal plants in Ethiopian ethnoveterinary medications are Croton macrostachyus, Solanum incanum, Calpurnia aurea and Withania somnifera.

On the other hand, ethnoveterinary knowledge and medicinal plants are at risk of extinction due to ecological and technological changes, access to modern health facilities and anthropogenic and natural factors that threaten the existence of many plant species of veterinary importance [5, 22]. Its mode of transfer and documentation is mainly oral and apprenticeship specific, which leads to the risk of losing such important knowledge that cannot be regained [3, 22]. In addition, rapid socio-economic and outward rural migrations and the paucity of research on the ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants in treating livestock diseases further undermine its relevance [23]. Hence, there is consequently a need to scientifically record, document, promote the use of ethnoveterinary medications and the conservation of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants [19]. Such studies can aid in proposing effective and cheaper treatment alternatives to veterinary diseases, enhance ethnoveterinary medicinal plant conservation and provide information for experimentation studies in search of modern pharmaceuticals [2, 5, 24]. These and other related issues have enhanced ethnoveterinary medicine inventories in recent years in Africa [25, 26], and similarly, in Ethiopia [15, 19, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33].

The study District is situated in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia, between the eastern escarpment and the western escarpment [34, 35], with relatively high biodiversity, but is under great pressure due to agricultural economic corridors and highway constructions, among others. The District has a high livestock population of cattle, sheep, goats and donkeys under the traditional animal husbandry system. In addition to modern veterinary services, local communities use ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and associated traditional knowledge to sustain the health of their livestock. But these knowledge and medicinal plants are becoming fragile due to environmental change, overuse, acculturation, weakening of social structures and verbal modes of knowledge transfer, which lead to information loss and threaten medicinal plants. Consequently, there is a need to document the available indigenous ethnoveterinary knowledge and practices with their respective medicinal plants. In fact, several ethnoveterinary studies have reported veterinary uses of Ethiopian medicinal plants, but compared to the rich cultural and plant diversity in the country, it is still not at the expected level, and to the best of our knowledge, no ethnobotanical research has yet been done on ethnoveterinary practices and medicinal plants in Dugda District. Therefore, the current research aimed (1) to document ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants to fill the gap and identify the most potential ethnoveterinary medicinal plants, (2) to quantify consent on ethnoveterinary practices, healing potential and multipurpose ethnoveterinary medicinal plants using relevant ethnobotanical indices and (3) to find new ethnoveterinary medicinal plants used in Dugda District, which could be important source for the discovery of new veterinary pharmaceuticals.

Materials and methods

Description of the study area

The research was conducted in Dugda District located within the Central Rift Valley, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. The study area was selected based on presence of rich indigenous knowledge (Gada system), other cultural factors and pressure on remnant woodlands and bushlands patches due to demand for farmlands, irrigation and wood products for different purposes such as charcoal making and collection of fuelwood and construction materials. The study area topographically lies within agro-climate zone called sub-tropical (Weina Dega/Badda-daree) and semi-arid. The landscape is characterized by flat topped plain, valley, mountains and grouped under drought prone highland. The major soil types are sandy loam and clay loam, which have good drainage capacity suitable for irrigation and rain fed crop production. The total area covered by the District is 95,945 ha and situated at 8°01′ N—8°10′ N latitude 38°31′ E—38°57′ E longitude and with an altitude 1600–2020 m above sea level (Fig. 1). The average annual rainfall varies from 700 to 800 mm and the temperature ranges from 22° to 28 °C; such rainfall and temperature patterns are relatively, suitable for crop production, animal husbandry and human habitation. Ethnographically, the indigenous people inhabiting the study area belong to the Oromo known as Jille Oromo, the largest ethnic group in Ethiopia, and speak Afaan Oromo, and people with different ethnic backgrounds have also settled there. Mostly the local people are farmers, as a result their economy is based on mixed crop-livestock farming system and fishing. The main agricultural activities are rain fed grain/cereal crops production, irrigation for vegetables and fruit production and livestock farming. The indigenous communities have long tradition of livestock husbandry, particularly, cattle have special place, as key for local economy, source of their livelihood and cultural values. The District is rich in livestock population, with 323,129 cattle, 98,239 sheep, 87,764 goats, 24,194 donkeys, 6,390 horses and 2,645 mules and as well as 251,974chicken (Dugda District Agricultural Office, unpublished data of 2021). The economically important livestock diseases in the District were anthrax, blackleg, bacterial diseases, lumpy skin disease (LSD), Newcastle disease and African horse sickness (AHS) (Dugda District Agricultural Office, unpublished data of 2021). Regarding veterinary services in the District, there are 14 Type D veterinary clinics to service 38 rural kebeles and only one Type B clinic at the District centre Meki town. A total of 32 veterinarians are delivering veterinary services in the District, which include Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (5), Bachelor in Veterinary Science (10), Animal Health Assistances (16) and Veterinary Laboratory Technician (1) (Dugda District Agricultural Office, unpublished data of 2021). The vegetation of the area is described as Acacia-Commiphora woodland and bushland land (ACB) under subdivision Acacia wooded grassland of the Rift Valley (ACB/RV), mostly dominated by Acacia spp. including Vachellia tortilis, Senegalia senegal, Vachellia seyal and Balanites aegyptiaca [34,35,36]. This Acacia dominated woodland is a highly fragile ecosystem adapted to semi-arid conditions with erratic rainfall, growing on complex and vulnerable hydrological system. The District also has wetland plants such as Setaria geminata, Typha domingensis, Cyperus papyrus, Nymphaea nouchali and Aeschynomene elaphroxylon [36]. Vegetation of the study area, particularly woodlands and wetlands, are the mainstay of local communities, being vital sources of fuelwood, construction materials, fodder, shade, medicinal plants, wild food plants, farm implements and honey flora. For example, V. tortilis for charcoal and firewood; T. domingensis for thatching, A. elaphroxylon for firewood, roofing and utensils; and S. senegal and Faidgerbia albida are used for fencing. And some big trees and shrubs like Ficus sycomorus, Solanum incanum, Podocarpus falcatus, Premna schimperi, Ficus vasta and V. tortilis are also socio-culturally important as symbol, sacred and spiritual connections.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Ethiopia showing Oromia region and the location of the study area (Developed using ArcGIS 10.4.1) Study kebeles are indicated by initials in the map as DD Dodota Danbal, GD Gusa Dongorota, GKA Giraba Korke Adi, JB Jawe Bofo, KiB Kiltu Bilbila, KB Koto Biliti, KJ Koye Jajaba, MJ Maja Lalu, MW Manjikso Waji, MuL Mukiye Laman, SW Sera Wakale, SG Shubi Gamo, TC Tepho Choroke, TD Tuchi Danbal, TS Tuchi Sumayan, WH Walda Hafa, WK Walda Kalina and WM Walda Makdala

Gada system, livestock and plant conservation

Jille Oromos had traditional governance called Gada system, which deals with all-encompassing social, economic, cultural and political activities. Just like other Oromos in different parts of Ethiopia, Jille Oromos have five Gada party in their Gada system including Birmaji, Melba, Mudana, Halchisa and Robale, where all have their own leader called Abba Gada, transfer power peacefully and each lead for eight years. But before transfer of power each Gada parts have to learn laws and fetch those laws by moving to Oda Nabe (near Bishoftu city) with their livestock mainly cattle (Caffe Godansa). These laws include law of God (Sera Waqa), laws of land (Sera Lafa), laws of father and mother (Sera Abba fi Hadha) and laws related to other socio-cultural practices. Abba Gada has advisors called Ayyantu (Raga), in which they consult these reputable persons in their Gada period for each and every activities. Ayyantu is respected person in the society that had God given ability to forecast good fortune and challenges that would happen a year or in eight years of each Gada period. These situation could be related to an individual or the whole society, such as rainy seasons of the year, livestock diseases, war/conflict, peace, drought and famine. In doing this, they have established a kind of trend that would happen in each Gada period, for example, in Gada Birmaji there would be high frequency of livestock diseases, Gada Melba known by conflict and truth, Gada Mudana by plenty of rain and prosperity, Gada Halchisa good for livestock productivity and Gada Robale known by drought and famine. Thus, Gada system had important role in livestock production and welfare, based on each circumstances in each Gada period these would make livestock keepers be prepared beforehand, to locate alternative grazing lands and water resources for their livestock.

Furthermore, Gada system had a concept of plant conservation, by prohibiting cutting of respected plants and protection of places of Gada practices (Arda Jila/Malka). These plant species include Ficus sycomorus (Oda), F. thonningii, Podocarpus falcatus, Premna schimperi, Phoenix reclinata and Cordia Africana. The aforementioned plant species and others are also important in Gada practices as sources of material cultures, constructions, ritual grounds, praying and blessings. One typical example of sacred place in the study area is a place called Oda Tuta (group of F. sycomorus trees), where over 200 F. sycomorus stands found in one place and serve for various Gada events. However, nowadays such practices are weakening due to various factors and need attention and revitalization for plant biodiversity and associated indigenous knowledge conservations.

Participant selection and interviewing process

Ethnoveterinary survey was conducted during several field trips made between April 2020 and June 2021 in 18 kebeles of Dugda District. The reconnaissance survey was carried out prior to data collection and the researchers got overview on vegetation types, ethnoveterinary knowledge of medicinal plants, knowledgeable people, natural resource management and conservation practices. The study kebeles were selected with the help of Development Agents, local leaders, elders and observation during the reconnaissance survey, based on the vegetation cover and availability of knowledgeable people on ethnoveterinary medicinal plants (Fig. 1). The key informants were selected through purposive and snowball techniques [37]. The representative general informants were selected through systematic random sampling techniques following the methods described by Martin [38]. During selection of informants different socio-demographic characteristics of the informants were considered. A total of 378 informants (from 18 kebeles (subdistricts or smallest administrative units in Ethiopian Admin system), 21 informants each) were sampled, where general informants (288) were selected in volunteer and interviewed, during field trips made in the respective study kebeles. Nominations on knowledgeable persons on medicinal plants to participate as key informants was made by the help of elderly people, Development Agents and village leaders in the study kebeles. Following this, a total of 90 traditional healers (27 female and 63 male) were selected. These healers have high reputation with respect to their traditional knowledge on medicinal plants and long-term ethnoveterinary services. Regarding gender of informants’, male informants were 250, while 128 informants were female. The age of the informants’ ranges between 20 and 87 years. They are distributed into two age groups, 131 informants (20–39) young group and 247 informants (40–87) matured group, where 40 years old is considered as turning into maturity in knowledge and leadership. The majority of the interviewed informants were illiterate (257, 67.99%), who did not attend school. And occupationally, most informants were farmers (313, 82.80%), who’s daily livelihood mainly based on agricultural activities like crop production and livestock farming (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the informants

Ethnobotanical data collection

Ethnoveterinary medicine data were collected using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, participant field observations and with very close interaction with informants. The semi-structured interview in the field survey with informants were conducted in local language called “Afaan Oromo” following method described in Martin [38]. The appropriate ethical permission to conduct the research was obtained through formal letter by Addis Ababa University (AAU) to Dugda District authority and local community leaders (Kebeles). Before interview process, government bodies at district and kebele levels, and all informants were briefed about the research objectives and its academic purposes. Indeed, prior informed consent was obtained verbally from each informant before the commencement of interviews, then semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted. The semi-structured interview contained questions on socio-economic and demographic characteristics regarding name, age, sex, level of education, occupation, religion and ethnicity of informants. Information regarding local names of medicinal plants, ailments treated, habitats of the species, degree of management (wild/cultivated), part/parts used, conditions of plant part used (fresh/dried), other ingredients or additives, methods of remedy preparations, routes of remedy administration, noticeable adverse effects of remedies, use of antidotes for adverse effects, taboos/beliefs related to collection and use of plant, source of knowledge, methods of indigenous knowledge transfer, other use of medicinal plants, existing threats and traditional conservation practices (if any) were collected following ethnobotanical methods described in [16, 19, 39]. Further, focus group discussions (6–8 informants) in each study kebeles (subdistrict) were conducted to validate, clarify and harmonize the results obtained through semi-structured interviews [40]. Besides, guided field observations were performed with key informants which create an opportunity for more discussion on different issues, and useful in describing and practical identification of medicinal plants, identifying different vegetation types and land-use impacts by indicating problems or possible solutions following the method described by Cunningham [41]. Finally, informants’ description of livestock ailment types was translated with the consultation of veterinarians working in the study area and then translated into veterinary terms.

Voucher specimens of the medicinal plant cited for their ethnoveterinary services were collected and identified at least in their local names with the help of key informants during guided field observations, following standard botanical collection procedures. Plant voucher specimens were collected from natural vegetation, woodlands, grasslands, farmlands and home-gardens during the field walks with the help of informants and local field assistants. Voucher specimen identification was done in the field and later at the National Herbarium (ETH) of Addis Ababa University (AAU) using taxonomic keys provided in the relevant volumes of Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. The specimen identification was confirmed by a plant taxonomic expert at AAU. The identified voucher specimens were numbered, labelled and deposited in the ETH. Plant scientific names were updated according to the World Flora Online (WFO, http://www.worldfloraonline.org) and databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect and SpringerLink were used for literature collection and compiled in Zotero, then compared with the present study.

Quantitative ethnobotanical data analysis

Ethnoveterinary data were arranged and organized by using Microsoft Excel spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel, 2013). Quantitatively analysed using descriptive statistic methods like percentile and frequency distribution were used to summarize medicinal plant data based on use reports. The raw data of ethnoveterinary medicinal species were summarized and reported in table form with their scientific name, family name, local name, growth form, ailment treated, plant parts used, ailments, livestock types treated, conditions of plant part used, method of preparation and application, route of administration and collection number. The statistical test of significance was performed using independent sample t test on the number of medicinal plants cited by different groups: gender (male and female), age (young and matured), informant type (key and general informants) and educational level (illiterate and literate). The analysis of quantitative ethnobotanical data was conducted using informant consensus factor (ICF), fidelity-level (FL) and relative importance (RI) formulas as described below.

Informant consensus factor (ICF)

The informant consensus factor (ICF) values was used to assess the homogeneity or degree of agreement of the informants’ knowledge about medicinal plants, which help to determine the most important livestock ailment categories in the study area. It is calculated as follows:

$${\text{ICF}}\, = \,\left( {{\text{Nur}}\, - \,{\text{Nt}}} \right)/{\text{Nur}}\, - \,{1})$$

where n = number, and UR = use report (s), while t = plant (s) [39, 49, 50].

Fidelity level (FL)

Fidelity level (FL) of the medicinal plants conducted to compare and determine relative healing potential of medicinal plants based on ailment category. It was computed as follows:

$${\text{FL}}\left( \% \right)\, = \,{\text{Ip}}/{\text{Iu}}\, \times \,{1}00$$

where Ip is the number of informants who independently cited ailment category and Iu the total number of informants who reported the plants for any given ailment category [51].

Relative importance (RI)

Relative importance (RI) of each cited medicinal plant was calculated using a method by Bennett and Prance [52]. RI was calculated using:

$${\text{RI}}\, = \,{\text{NP}}\, + \,{\text{NCS}}$$

where NP is obtained as: number of specific ailments treated by a given species divided by the total number of specific ailments treated by the most multipurpose species. NCS is the number of ailment categories treated by a given species divided by the total number of ailment categories treated by the most multipurpose species. Species with RI value close to 2 are the ones with the highest diversity of medicinal application and close to 0 least diversity of medicinal application.

Results

Major livestock diseases in the study area

A total of 37 livestock ailments have been reported by informants, which are treated by 64 ethnoveterinary medicinal plants. The ailments of livestock in the District were mostly seasonal, which made the livestock susceptible during seasonal transition as result of changes in vegetation and animal fodders composition. The most prevalent and commonly treated ailments were anthrax with 18 species (28.13%), followed by inappetence (15 species, 23.44%), diarrhoea (13, 20.31%), rabies (12, 18.75%), bloating (11, 17.19%), blackleg and mange (10, 15.63%) each. Other important animal ailments were treated by 3 to 7 medicinal plants as indicated in Table 2.

Table 2 Ailments treated by ethnoveterinary medicinal plants

Taxonomic diversity ethnoveterinary medicinal plants

In this study, a total of 64 ethnoveterinary plants belonging to 58 genera and 33 families were reported to treat different livestock ailments. Of the total, the majority of plant species (52) were native or indigenous to Ethiopia and a single plant species was recorded as endemic (Kalanchoe petitiana). In addition, among total ethnoveterinary medicinal plants, 11 (17.19%) plant species were introduced and five plant species (7.81%) were identified as invasive alien species (Tables 9 and 10). The analysis of botanical families of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants showed that 33 plant families were involved in ethnoveterinary practices of Dugda District. Of the total plant families, 65.62% of medicinal plants were contributed by eleven plant families, where as 34.38% come from the remaining families. Family Fabaceae was the best represented, with seven medicinal plant species, followed by Apocynaceae, Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae, with five species each, Malvaceae and Vitaceae, with four species each (Fig. 2). The results from life forms of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants indicated that herbs were the most frequently utilized life forms in ethnoveterinary services of the study area, with 21 species (32.81%), and followed by shrubs 20 (31.25%). The other therapeutic life forms utilized in remedy preparation were climbers 13 (20.13%) and trees 10 (15.63%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants of Dugda District in botanical families

Plant parts used for remedy preparation

The analysis of plant parts used for ethnoveterinary remedy preparations revealed that leaves were the most frequently used plant parts, which come from 36 species (56.25%), followed by root (15 species, 23.44%), whole part (8, 12.50%) and fruits (6, 9.38%). In addition, other plant parts such as stem bark, latex, seeds, bulbs, stem, tuber and young shoot were also sought for remedy preparations in ethnoveterinary practices of the study District, with low percent of contribution (Fig. 3). Regarding condition of plant parts during remedy preparations, the majority (92.19%) of remedies were prepared from freshly harvested plant parts and a few preparations from fresh/dry (10.94%) and dry (9.38%) plant parts.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Plant parts used for remedy preparation in Dugda District

Modes of remedy preparation and application

The local people and traditional healers of the Dugda District have reported several traditional methods used in preparation and application of ethnoveterinary remedies for treatment of various ailments in livestock. Among these modes of preparation and application, pounding and drenching (46.85%) was the most common mode of remedy preparation and application, followed by grinding and drenching (18.18%), and pounding, spraying, washing and pasting (7.69%) (Fig. 4). Pounding, best way of preparation in the area, where plant parts as mono-preparation or poly-herbal preparation are pounded using a wooden mortar and pestle, then soaked in cold water to get intended veterinary remedies. The majority of ethnoveterinary remedies (84.31%) were formulated from single plant species, but only 15.69% of the remedies were made from poly-herbal (multi-plants) formulations, i.e. ethnoveterinary remedies prepared from concoction of two or more medicinal plant species (Tables 9 and 10). For instance, poly-herbal preparation from concoction of eight medicinal plants; roots from Cyphostemma cyphopetalum, Withania somnifera, Cucumis ficifolius, Foeniculum vulgare, and leaves from Dodonaea viscosa subsp. angustifolia, Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Synonym: Vernonia amygdalina), Marsdenia schimperi, (Synonym: Dregea schimperi), and young shoots of Croton macrostachyus. These all medicinal plant parts were reported to be pounded together, mixed with cold water and salt, being effective remedy for cattle ailments, namely anthrax, blackleg, LSD and bovine ephemeral fever (BEF). In either ways, cold water was the most frequently used solvent to extract bioactive ingredients found in ethnoveterinary medicinal plants of the study area. After preparation, the traditional healers administer remedies to diseased livestock as drenches without sieving. In addition to plant materials and water, some other ingredients were also used in formulations of remedies, these include: salt, soot/charcoal, used petrol, kerosene, food, saliva, milk, blood, butter/ghee, whey and skimmed milk.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Modes of ethnoveterinary remedy preparation and application in Dugda District

On top of all, the important process in ethnoveterinary medicine or ethnomedicine practice is locating sources of medicinal plants by practitioners. In the study area, local people and traditional healers travel in search of fresh ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in different habitats/places including woodlands, parklands, farmlands, farm margins, fence, homestead, wetlands, riverine, on host trees for mistletoes and bought from markets, as the need of ethnoveterinary medicines arise. The data on sources of medicinal plants showed that indigenous the people of the study area mostly utilize wild medicinal plant resources (53 species), while a few (11 species) medicinal plants were recorded as cultivated and semi-wild, six and five medicinal plant species, respectively.

Routes of ethnoveterinary remedy administration

Ethnoveterinary remedies for livestock in Dugda District were administered through different administration routes based on encountered ailments. The dominant administration route was oral (72.67%), followed by dermal (12%) and nasal (7%). The remaining routes of administration were less frequently used applications (Fig. 5). Oral application, the most frequently applied route of remedy administration, is practiced as drenching herbal remedy through mouth of the diseased livestock.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Routes of administration of ethnoveterinary remedy in Dugda District

In connection with this, farmers and traditional healers determine the dosage of remedies, after visual inspections of the diseased animals, on the basis of age, sex, physical condition of the diseased animals, severity of the disease, types of animals and pregnancy status of animals. The veterinary remedies were measured by variety of instruments such as finger length, Can, glass, plastic jug, coffee cup, bottle, number of drops and number of plant heads. Although there is no standardized dose, a wide ranges of doses were applied for treatment of livestock diseases, starting from single drop via left nostril and ear of dogs and cats (prophylaxis against rabies) to two Can (approximately two litre) to treat diseases like anthrax, blackleg, BEF and LSD. Similarly, the administration frequency of remedies delivered to the diseased animals ranges from only once to until the animals recovered from the disease.

Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants and types of livestock treated

Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants in the study area were analysed based on their use reports. The most utilized medicinal plant species include: W. somnifera (53 use reports), Kedrostis foetidissima (43), C. cyphopetalum (35), Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (35), Cucumis ficifolium (34), Calpurnia aurea (33), Senna occidentalis (32), Phytolacca dodecandra (28), Croton macrostachyus (28), Melia azedarach (25), Cyphostemma pannosum (22), Dodonaea viscosa subsp. angustifolia (22) and Foeniculum vulgare (20) (Table 3).

Table 3 Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants with the highest use reports

Ethnoveterinary medicines, prepared from aforementioned and other therapeutic plant species, are reported to be utilized for the treatment of various ailments of domestic animals. The majority of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants (56 species, 87.50%) were used to treat cattle, followed by goats and sheep (16, 25%), all livestock (12, 18.75%), equines (10, 15.63%), dogs and cats (5, 7.81%), but only single preparation (1, 1.56%) was reported for treatment of chicken disease.

Ethnoveterinary ailment category

A total of 37 ailments of the livestock were recorded in Dugda District. These ailments were further categorized into nine ailment categories, and then, informants’ consensus factor (ICF) values were calculated for each categories. The output of ICF values ranges from 0.69 to 0.94. The ailment category with the highest ICF value was respiratory diseases (0.94). The other ailment categories were external parasitic diseases (0.91), gastrointestinal diseases (0.88), dermatological diseases (0.85), neurological diseases (0.83) and musculoskeletal diseases (0.81) (Table 4). Even though gastrointestinal diseases ranked at third place next to external parasitic diseases, the ailment category was reported to be treated by high number of medicinal plants with informants citations (34 species, 267 citation), followed by dermatological diseases (26, 168), and general illness diseases (24, 89).

Table 4 Informant consensus factor of ethnoveterinary ailment category

Medicinal plants used to treat ethnoveterinary ailment category

Relative healing potential of main medicinal plants used to treat each ailment category was evaluated by calculating their fidelity level (FL). Accordingly, the FL values of the three most cited medicinal plants for the treatment of ethnoveterinary ailment category were presented in (Table 5). The results of FL values of medicinal plants showed that there was high degree of agreement (> 50% FL) on selection of medicinal plants used to treat gastrointestinal, dermatological, reproductive, respiratory and ophthalmologic diseases categories, while external parasitic and general illness categories showed low agreement (< 50% FL). For example, high fidelity-level values were obtained for Melia azedarach (92%), Kedrostis foetidissima (67.4%) and Croton macrostachyus (58.8%) to treat gastrointestinal disease category.

Table 5 Fidelity-level value of top three medicinal plants commonly reported against ethnoveterinary ailment category

Relative importance of ethnoveterinary plants

The relative importance of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants was analysed to identify the most multipurpose (use diversity) medicinal plants based on the number of specific ailments and ailment categories treated by these plants. Accordingly, 27 (42.19%) medicinal plants were used to treat two or more specific ailment; likewise, about 25 (39.06%) medicinal plants were utilized to manage two and more ailment categories. The relative importance analysis (RI) revealed that Croton macrostachyus had highest diversity of uses (2), followed by Kedrostis foetidissima, Withania somnifera, Phytolacca dodecandra and Senna occidentalis (Table 5). Interestingly, the majority of reported medicinal plants were used as gastrointestinal agents (53.13%), followed by dermatological agents (43.10%), general illness agents (40.63%), musculoskeletal agents (21.88%) and neurological agents (18.75%) (Table 6).

Table 6 Relative importance of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in Dugda District

Distribution of ethnoveterinary medicinal plant knowledge

The statistical test of significance was performed using independent sample t test on the number of medicinal plants cited by informant groups in the study District. The result of independent sample t test revealed that there was significance difference (P < 0.05) between key and general informants on the number of medicinal plant species. Similarly, there was significance difference (P < 0.05) between the two age groups; young group (20–39 years) and matured group (40–87 years) informants. Significance difference (P < 0.05) was also obtained between illiterate and literate informants on the number of medicinal plant species mentioned. However, there was no significance difference (P > 0.05) in the number of medicinal plants reported by male and female informants (Table 7).

Table 7 Statistical test of significance among different informant groups based on number of reported medicinal plants by informants in Dugda District

Discussion

Livestock ailments and diversity of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants

In Dugda District, similar to other part of Ethiopia, livestock is an important and integral wealth of indigenous people, where livestock provide cash income and foods, means of transportation, draught power, wealth accumulation (Kila lixu), socio-cultural values as gift upon marriage (Gabra/Biti and Tirma/Gega’o), in religious practices (Fala), Gada system (Butta qalu) and other cultural events. However, livestock populations, particularly cattle are frequently affected by livestock ailments including anthrax, inappetence, diarrhoea, rabies, blackleg and mange, which deteriorate health and productivity. These ailments are also among the top prevalent livestock ailment in the study District, which are also among the commonly encountered ailments throughout the country and commonly reported to be treated by herbal medications [14, 21]. Similar ethnoveterinary inventories conducted elsewhere in Ethiopia also showed the prevalence of anthrax, inappetence, diarrhoea, rabies, blackleg and mange, including researches by Yineger et al. [16] at Bale Mountains National Park, Giday and Teklehaymanot [18] in Afar people of Ada’ar District, Kidane et al. [15] in Maale and Ari ethnic communities, Lulekal et al. [19] for people of Ankober District, and Assefa and Bahiru [29] at Abergelle, Sekota and Lalibela districts. Although the outbreak and prevalence of livestock diseases varies among the areas due to climatic differences, the comparison showed similar disease-causing factors, wide prevalence and serious economic impact of these diseases in the country, beside a nearly similar livestock’s management system throughout the country.

Most importantly, a good number of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants (64) are reported to be used in management of livestock ailments in Dugda District, pertinent to availability, cultural acceptability, affordability and efficacy to treat livestock [2]. This is supported by the argument of Van der Merwe et al. [2] who stated that the indications for ethnoveterinary medicines in livestock are similar in different areas, but the ethnoveterinary medicinal plants used are usually different, based on locally available plant populations. In general, indigenous and local people of a given area developed an indigenous and local knowledge system that best fits to select and use diverse curative medicinal plants to treat frequently occurring livestock diseases [19] and less severe diseases and or injuries [53].

Interestingly, the use of herbal remedies to treat livestock ailments is still alive in the Dugda District. The result showed that in the District, farmers and traditional healers are rich in ethnoveterinary knowledge and utilize medicinal plants to treat livestock ailments. This may be related to the inhabitants’ strong relationship with livestock, its location between Arsi and Gurage Highlands. It could be also attributed to familiarity of local people to ethnoveterinary remedies, which make them feel safe in using traditional remedies. In addition, movement with livestock in search of grazing land (Godansa) and Gada grade celebrations (Chaffe Godansa), where they fetch law governing everything including livestock, human being and natural resources. Such activities might have helped them to keep the traditional livestock healing culture and share among themselves and beyond. And the presence of medicinal plants (64) indicated the potential of the District as an ethnoveterinary resource pool, despite the high rate of degraded habitats that continued for so long, its semi-arid nature and drought prone. Similar ethnoveterinary studies elsewhere in Ethiopia also reported comparable number of medicinal plants, to mention a few, 43 medicinal plants [17]; 46 [15]; 49 [18]; 51 [19]; and 53 [29]. Some of the studies documented higher number of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants than the current results, such as by Yineger et al. [16] (74 species), Yigezu et al. [33] (74) and Dinbiso et al. [54] (103), at Bale Mountains National Park, four districts of Jima Zone and Dawuro Zone of Ethiopia, respectively. Thus, the present and early ethnoveterinary inventories showed the importance of medicinal plants in management of different livestock ailments, particularly, in areas where modern veterinary services are absent, expensive, inaccessible and scanty [15]. This could be also related to poverty, the availability of medicinal plants, better accessibility and low cost of herbal medications. However, ethnoveterinary practices are vary from place to place and that is related to the diverse culture and tradition of the people as well as the vegetation type of a particular area [15].

The analysis of botanical families of ethnoveterinary plants revealed that Fabaceae, Apocynaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae, Malvaceae and Vitaceae families are the dominant families in ethnoveterinary medication systems of Dugda District. This finding is in line with other similar ethnoveterinary studies conducted elsewhere in Ethiopia [15, 18, 19, 27, 29, 31, 33], where these families were reported as important in their respective ethnoveterinary services. The greater number of species in these families could be attributed to their wide distribution and abundance in the Acacia wooded grassland of the Rift Valley (ACB/RV) vegetation, the study area in particular. The member species of these families have developed drought-resistant mechanisms to dwell in semi-arid dry land of Great Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Besides, Fabaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae and Apocynaceae families are also among the top 25 families of vascular plants of Ethiopian flora area [55] and most frequently utilized plant families to treat livestock ailments in the country [21]. Thus, the preference of members of these families could be related to availability in close vicinity, presence of bioactive ingredients in member of these families and long-term familiarity with these herbal materials [56].

In the study area, various types of medicinal plants’ life forms are employed, among which herbs accounted the highest share, followed by shrubs. The dominance of herbaceous species could be related to their rapid grow during bimodal rainy seasons of the area, availability around homestead and ease of collection. As described in Giday and Teklehaymanot [18], shrubby species are also better adapted to arid conditions as compared to plants of other life forms, which made them abundant and available in such areas for farmers and pastoralists in need. Frequent use of herbs in ethnoveterinary medications were reported in ethnoveterinary studies investigated in different part of Ethiopia [15, 16, 32, 54, 57], similarly others recorded shrubs as important herbal medications [18, 19, 27, 28]. In contrast to present finding, tree species constituted the largest share in other ethnoveterinary studies [22, 29, 33]. This similarity and variation in utilization of life forms of ethnoveterinary plants in different communities could be attributed to agro-ecological settings, indigenous knowledge exchange and independent development of indigenous knowledge in their respective communities.

Plant parts used for remedy preparation

The other important attributes of ethnoveterinary plants analysed were plant parts used for preparation of veterinary remedies. The study revealed that leaves are the most sought plant part for remedies preparation followed by roots. This collection of leaves as major ethnoveterinary treatments could be related to high phytochemical constituents, ease of collection and preparation of remedies, and readily availability in time of need. In agreement with current result, leaves have been reported as commonly utilized plant parts in ethnoveterinary medical systems of different ethnic groups of Ethiopia [15, 18, 22, 28, 31, 33, 54, 58] and elsewhere in the world [25, 59,60,61,62,63]. These findings differ from the results of Yineger et al. [16] who reported frequent use of roots in ethnoveterinary medical system of communities living around Bale Mountains National Park of Ethiopia. Interestingly, use of leaves as a single remedy or concoction with other parts in the study area is important for sustainable utilization of medicinal resources, because leaves are renewable resources of medicinal plants in contrary to the roots. Several studies [18, 59] indicated that gathering leaves are recommendable, as its collection does not result the death of the entire plant. However, conservation issues have been raised by other studies [19, 63], due to ethnobotanical collection of roots and whole parts, which may be destructive and unsustainable, as harvesting of roots may increase the risk of the medicinal plants extinction.

Ethnoveterinary remedy of Dugda District is largely prepared from freshly harvested plant parts. Preference of freshly made remedies could be attributed to attaining volatile essential oils and secondary metabolites, which are important to fight disease-causing agents in livestock with high efficacy and curative power, these bioactive ingredients will escape or be degraded upon drying. In line with this, traditions of using ethnoveterinary remedies prepared from fresh plant materials were widely observed in different cultural communities of Ethiopia, for instance, in ethnoveterinary medication of Afar people of Ada’ar District [18], Ankober District [19] and Mojana District [27].

Methods of remedy preparation and routes of application

In remedy preparation, local people and traditional healers strictly follow ways needed to get the intended livestock remedies. The current findings showed that pounding is the most common mode of ethnoveterinary remedies preparation, and closely followed by grinding. According to Gakuubi and Wanzala [73], modes of recipe preparation largely depended on the type of targeted medicinal plant, parts of plants employed, type of disease and the livestock types being treated. And also it could be related to long-term experiences of traditional healers on modes of remedy preparation and application with best preforming ethnoveterinary regimens [19].

Furthermore, local communities also took into consideration the number of medicinal plants involved while preparing herbal remedies based on ailments and livestock types. In this particular study, large portion of livestock remedies are formulated from single medicinal plants. The use of single plant species for the majority of ethnoveterinary recipes were also common in different cultural groups of Ethiopia [15, 18, 19, 31, 54] and other countries [3, 60, 62, 64,65,66]. As Grade et al. [66] stated, the mono-preparations of veterinary remedies could be related to confidence, experiences and deep ethnoveterinary knowledge of farmers and traditional healers to select only one specific remedy. In contrast, the dominance of poly-herbal preparations were also documented in other ethno-lingual communities, such as at Bale Mountains National Park [16]; four Districts of Jimma Zone of Ethiopia [33]; and in Buuri district of Kenya [63]. These authors argue that concoction of two or more plants would increase synergistic effects (effectiveness), neutralize toxicity effects and/or bitterness, palatability and ease of application of ethnoveterinary remedies. Furthermore, the use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants is also shaped by familiarity of local communities with their environs, vegetation types, seasonality and ease of availability of herbal material in that particular area [56].

Regarding solvents used in livestock remedy preparations, cold water was the most principal solvent for remedy extraction. Similar observations were also made by ethnoveterinary studies in Ethiopia [19, 28, 31, 33, 54] and in pastoral Karamoja of Uganda [66], where cold water was preferred as best and effective solvent in extraction of active ingredient found in medicinal plant used in management of livestock diseases. However, other findings elsewhere in the world [59, 61, 67, 68] revealed that ethnoformulation of decoctions in boiling water was the prominent methods of ethnoveterinary recipes preparation. Maphosa and Masika [23] further explained that boiling plant material in water for a long time to form a decoctions may promote extraction of water soluble polar compounds or it could detoxify harmful substances, but the method is generalized one and less carefully selected plant parts are used [67]. In addition to herbal materials and water, non-plant materials such as salts, milk, butter, etc. are also used as important ingredients in ethnoveterinary system of the study area. These substances enhance ethnoveterinary remedies to be dissolved, improve its palatability and medicinal properties and as a vehicle system, during intake or topical application of remedies. Incorporating non-plant material in ethnoveterinary medicine preparation is not exceptional to the study area, while it is common practices in different ethno-lingual communities of Ethiopia [18, 33] and other parts of the world [62, 63, 65, 66]. In the study area, some special mode of remedy preparation and application was also observed, for example, simple surgical method on dewlap of oxen with swollen hump, where traditional healer slice root of Kalanchoe petitiana tie with string, then insert into dewlap to drawdown pus accumulated in hump.

In addition, non-plant veterinary remedies have also been documented in the study area, which are used to treat livestock ailments, these include: mixture of charcoal, burned petrol and water (for bloating), burned petrol (for wound), ash (for wound, bone fracture or dislocation), limestone (for emaciation and ectoparasites), salt (for eye disease), urine (for bloating), edible oil (bloating), honey (for gastrointestinal disorders), dough and whey (emaciation), faeces (for wound), cattle skin (for FMD), muck (smoking for BEF), sacrifice of black female sheep or goat (for evil spirit or evil eye), spleen (for anthrax) and hot iron (for blackleg and abscess). Non-plant ethnoveterinary remedies were also recorded by similar ethnoveterinary inventories conducted elsewhere in the world [13, 26, 65, 68, 69]. These uses of non-plant remedies for the management of livestock ailments could be better alternative for conservation of wild medicinal plants that are already under great threats.

As regards to sources of medicinal plants, the majority of therapeutic plants were collected from the wild. The dominance of wild medicinal plants in ethnoveterinary medicines could be related to the perceptions of indigenous people that wild plants are more potent than cultivated plants [26]. In conservation point of view, the predominance of wild sources point out presence of high impact on wild ethnoveterinary medicinal plants of the area due to ethnoveterinary collections [16, 19] and little practices of medicinal plant cultivation, which in long term diminish these vital plant resources. Ethnobotanical collection of medicinal plants from wild habitats for their roots put some plants under great pressure, like Withania somnifera, Phytolacca dodecandra, Cucumis ficifolius, Cyphostemma pannosum and Gomphocarpus fruticosus, as these plants are rarely found in the study area. Similarly, dependency of indigenous people on wild medicinal plant for their ethnoveterinary practices has been widely recorded by various ethnoveterinary studies in Ethiopia [15, 16, 18, 19, 49, 54] and elsewhere in the world [26, 62, 68]. As alternative to wild sources, studies advocated cultivation and conservation of medicinal plants as better strategy for livestock health and food security, overall socio-economic development of rural poor populations [54].

Oral routes administration of remedies in the form of drenching are the most frequent route of application used to treat livestock ailments. This could be related to prevalence of diseases affecting internal organs, where this route assists rapid physiological reaction with the intended disease-causing pathogens and increasing effectiveness of the medicines. Concur with present study, bulk of ethnobotanical studies have recorded oral application as prominent route in Ethiopia and other parts of the world [18, 29, 33, 54, 59, 61, 65]. The current findings are in different to those obtained by Yirga et al. [70], who found dermal application as commonly used route of administration in ethnoveterinary medications of Seharti-Samre district, Northern Ethiopia. As the case in the present study, lack of standardized dosage for ethnoveterinary regimens were also documented in ethnoveterinary practices of different ethno-lingual communities elsewhere in the world [18, 19, 60, 71, 72], the situation that made veterinarians hesitate to use ethnoveterinary medicines.

Widely used medicinal plants and types of livestock treated

The use reports analysis showed that some ethnoveterinary medicinal plants are most widely used in ethnoveterinary services than others in the study area. As a result, Withania somnifera, Kedrostis foetidissima, Cyphostemma cyphopetalum, Gymnanthemum amygdalinum, Calpurnia aurea, Cucumis ficifolius, Senna occidentalis, Phytolacca dodecandra and Croton macrostachyus are among the wildly used medicinal plants in the study District. According to Aziz et al. [56], wide acceptance of certain medicinal plants in ethnoveterinary medicines may be due to their efficient activity, large availability in the area and long history of use in traditional medicine, the situations that make them more feasible to use than plants that are difficult to harvest. On the other hand, the most frequently mentioned medicinal plants, it does not always mean they are more effective to treat ailments than less frequently cited medicinal plants. Because some ethnoveterinary knowledge of medicinal plants are common and shared while others are more localized and specific to certain communities, family lines and even individuals [7]. That means, medicinal plants with low use reports may be found in custodies of a few specialist traditional healers [7], for that matter such medicinal plants need future attentions. In this particular study, for example, ethnoveterinary knowledge related to medicinal plants used to treat rabies are very secret, held by a few individuals in the community. In addition, low use reports of medicinal plants also indicate indigenous knowledge associated with them are under risk to be lost.

The majority of ethnoveterinary plants are employed for the treatment of cattle ailments, while a few medicinal plants are used to treat goats and sheep, all livestock, equines, dogs, cats and poultry. This could be attributed to high prevalence of cattle ailments and cattle dominance in number in the study area and/or very strong cultural and economic attachments between cattle and indigenous people. Similar observations were made in other socio-cultural groups of Ethiopia, for examples, most ethnoveterinary remedies used to treat cattle in Ada’ar District of Afar region [18]; Ankober District of Amhara region [19]; and Dawuro Zone [54] of Ethiopia, which indicate better alternative to improve the welfare of cattle in the country. However, in ethnoveterinary practices of Abergelle, Sekota and Lalibela districts of Amhara region of Ethiopia, most veterinary recipes were being used to manage all domestic animals [29]. Such ethnoveterinary practices might be related to presence of fair ethnoveterinary knowledge associated with all livestock types and other domestic animals for management of their respective ailments, as compared to areas with high tendency to veterinary remedies used to treat cattle diseases.

Ethnoveterinary ailment category and fidelity level of medicinal plants

The informants’ consensus factor (ICF) for each ailment category is found between the ranges of (0.69–0.94). The results indicated that there is a well-defined selection criterion in the study community and informants have great agreement on indigenous and local knowledge of ethnoveterinary plants and practices [73]. It also determines the cultural consistency of the selection of a set of medicinal plants used in the treatment of a certain illness category [39]. The highest ICF values indicate high incidence of the disease category in the area. As well as, medicinal plants used to treat ailment categories are probably with high potency and important to select potential candidate medicinal plants for phytochemical and pharmacological research.

Furthermore, gastrointestinal diseases are reported to be treated by large number of medicinal plants as well as with high number of citations. Dermatological diseases are also treated by good number of therapeutic plants. This might be due to high prevalence of these disease categories in the study area. It also indicated that local people share the knowledge of the most important medicinal plants to treat the most frequently encountered livestock ailments in the area. Similar ethnoveterinary survey carried out in Ankober District of Ethiopia also recorded gastrointestinal, ecto- and endo-parasitic and dermatological as major and prevalent ailment categories of the area [19]. Berhanu et al. [57], similarly, reported that gastrointestinal, dermatological and febrile disorders are ailment categories with high frequency in Ambo District of Ethiopia. In addition, as botanical surveys in different part of the world indicate gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequently reported and prevalent ailment category throughout the world [56, 59, 64, 65, 73].

Medicinal plants with high fidelity-level value (> 50%) in each ailment category showed that these plants are abundantly found in the area and frequently used by local communities in the treatment of livestock ailments. As explained in Friedman et al. [74], if FL > 50%, then there is high degree of consensus around the use of this species for treatment of that particular ailment category, which makes plant appropriate candidate to treat this type of disease. It also shows relatively high healing potential of the species for treating ailments under the respective ailment categories and good candidate for further pharmacological studies [75]. However, some medicinal plants including Cyphostemma cyphopetalum, Withania somnifera, Gymnanthemum amygdalina and Cucumis ficifolius had low FL values in their respective disease categories. The low FL values show the local inhabitants disagree on use of medicinal plants to treat particular ailment categories, it could be due their multipurpose in ethnoveterinary medicine formulation.

Relative importance of ethnoveterinary plants

In Dugda District, 27 (42.19%) medicinal plants were reported to be multipurpose species with diversity of remedies ranges (2–8 remedies). In this regard, the most multipurpose medicinal plant species in the study area were Croton macrostachyus, Kedrostis foetidissima, Withania somnifera, Senna occidentalis and Gymnanthemum amygdalinum. For instance, C. macrostachyus was used to treat eight specific ailments and five disease categories including gastrointestinal, dermatological, musculoskeletal, neurological and general illness. Similar observation was made by Dinbiso et al. [54] and Lulekal et al. [19] in Dawuro Zone and Ankober District of Ethiopia, where C. macrostachyus is used for treatment of multiple veterinary ailments, 10 and 8 ailments, respectively. Multipurpose of W. somnifera and G. amygdalinum are also documented in ethnoveterinary practices of four District of Jimma zone of Ethiopia [33]. Similarly, S. occidentalis is also a multipurpose species in other part of Africa [66, 76]. According to Giday and Teklehaymanot [18], medicinal plants with high relative importance (RI) indicate their relative abundance in that particular area. Furthermore, these plants are the most widely utilized ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in Ethiopian ethnoveterinary medicines [15, 19, 28, 29, 32]. Multipurpose of these medicinal plants could be attributed to their phytochemical constituents with wide spectrum bioactivity against wide range of ailments. Of the nine ailment categories, gastrointestinal ailments were reported to be treated by high number of medicinal plants, and closely followed by dermatological and general illness. In support of these results, Bennett and Prance [52] explained that gastrointestinal, skin and respiratory remedies are the most frequently reported types of medicines throughout the world.

Distribution of ethnoveterinary medicinal plant knowledge

In the present study, the comparison of ethnoveterinary medicinal plant knowledge showed significant difference, where key informants cited more medicinal plants than general informants. This could be attributed to the secret practice and transfer of ethnoveterinary knowledge along the family line, to safeguard their benefits from the knowledge and fear of loses of healing power of plant when disclosed. And it could be also related to long-term experience of key informants in using medicinal plants to treat livestock ailments. These findings in line with previous ethnoveterinary researches in Ethiopia [27, 28] that showed significant difference between key and general informants in ethnoveterinary plant knowledge. There was no significant difference observed in medicinal plant mentioned by male and female informants. A similar observations were made in another ethnoveterinary inventories in Ethiopia [27, 54] and differ from that of Asfaw et al. [28]. The comparison of medicinal plants cited by the two age groups (20–39 years and 40–87 years) showed significance difference. This indicates matured groups are more knowledgeable than young groups in using medicinal plants for veterinary uses, which was also reported from the early work [19], but dissimilar with that of [54]. It might be related to high experience of elders, close connection to natural ecosystem and livestock, faith on medicinal plant healing power and also knowledge gaps between generations. Similarly, the number of medicinal plants cited by illiterate and literate informants showed significant difference. This disparity could be attributed to the reliance of illiterate communities on medicinal plants to manage livestock ailments, while educated people prefer other options mostly modern drugs. It might be also related to poor connection of educated people with the traditional societies and natural ecosystems. Similar finding has been reported in ethnobotanical researches elsewhere in Ethiopia [19, 27]. In conclusion, ethnoveterinary medicinal plants knowledge is being threatened by globalization, expansion of modern education and ways of the knowledge transfer.

Importance of the current study in animal health and food security

Animal health is the important concern of ethnoveterinary study, because livestock are one of the pillar on which the livelihood of the communities rests. In the study area, the most prevalent ailments are anthrax, inappetence, diarrhoea, rabies, bloating, blackleg and mange. The aforementioned ailments are also the commonly encountered livestock ailments elsewhere in Ethiopia, which can cause substantial losses in livestock and lower productivity [14, 21]. The people in the study District and majority of livestock raisers elsewhere in Ethiopia have limited access to modern animal health services to deal with the encountered livestock ailments [77]. This is because local communities are geographically far from the sites of veterinary stations and those that are closer to the sites may not afford the fees for services. In such areas, farmers and pastoralists partly or solely depend on ethnoveterinary medicinal plants to sustain animal health. As described by Silva et al. [78], local people intentional or unintentional use therapeutic plants as ethnoveterinary medicine for food-producing animals that could improve the well-being and quality of derived-food products. This makes ethnoveterinary medicines a good alternative to modern drugs that used to manage livestock health in general and food-producing animals, in particular [78]. Particularly, its significance is paramount in arid and semi-arid areas, as livestock provide major food security in times of crop failure [10]. Because livestock tend to be more resilient than crops when disasters such as drought and floods strike [79]. Thus, ethnoveterinary medicinal plants could play a vital role in such areas to improve livestock health, which in turn used to ensure household food security and income generation options, and contribute to national livestock economy. Moreover, medicinal plants has the potential to improve the economic status of local communities and in alleviating poverty through marketing and long-term use [54].

When using ethnoveterinary medicine, we have to be curious about its dosage, since dosage is a determining factor, in small quantities as medicinal and large amounts may leads to toxicity or lethal to animals. In study area, some reported ethnoveterinary medicinal plants are with toxic potential (e.g. Croton macrostachyus, Melia azedarach, Xanthium spinosum, Calotropis procera, Datura stramonium and Phytolacca dodecandra). The ethnoveterinary practices of these medicinal plants could be poison due to substance accumulation (residues) or overdose [78]. The ethnoveterinary practices of toxic plants can be harmful to livestock, risky to human health (a concern on food safety) and may lead to harmful economic consequences [78]. Therefore, as stated by Silva et al. [78], shortcomings of ethnoveterinary practices are toxicity/inefficacy and lack of standardization that should be validated through pharmacological properties studies with toxicity investigations.

Furthermore, some prevalent livestock ailments in the study area are zoonotic diseases (anthrax and rabies), which are treated by medicinal plants. Anthrax and rabies are among the five prioritized zoonotic diseases that Ethiopia has committed to control, using a One Health approach [10]. Thus, current findings also offer crucial insight for One Health approach in controlling zoonotic diseases in Ethiopia and beyond and also illustrate the importance of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in both livestock and human health problems.

Comparison with previous studies in Ethiopia

Comparison of current study with the ethnoveterinary studies in Ethiopia showed that 56 medicinal plants are documented in various similar studies in the country to treat different livestock ailments. The most frequently documented medicinal plants include Achyranthes aspera, Calpurnia aurea, Croton macrostachyus, Cucumis ficifolius, Datura stramonium, Phytolacca dodecandra, Solanum incanum, Verbascum sinaiticum and Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Table 8). Tihahu et al. [21] also reported the frequent utilization of these ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in the country. According to Lulekal et al. [19], similarity in use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in different communities could be attributed to cross-cultural exchange of indigenous knowledge among different ethnic groups, within similar ethnic group and also availability of the species in use in those areas. This could be also related to similarity in climatic and weather conditions, geographical location and communities’ faith on medicinal plants healing power [21]. In addition, their frequent utilization might be coincide with the presence of bioactive ingredients against livestock ailments [21], as evidenced in various pharmacological studies and shown promising antimicrobial activities [80].

Table 8 Comparison of reported ethnoveterinary medicinal plants with previous studies in Ethiopia

Some reported medicinal plants are also widely used as ethnoveterinary medications in different countries of the world too [26, 59,60,61, 64, 65, 67, 68, 76, 81,82,83,84,85]. Just to mention a few Allium sativum, Melia azedarach, Calotropis procera, Cissus quadrangularis, Foeniculum vulgare, Nicotiana tabacum, Opuntia ficus-indica and Withania somnifera. This similarity could be due to mixing of cultural knowledge through globalization, substitution of native species for exotic, naturalization of exotic species, cosmopolitan nature of species in use and its associated knowledge [60]. The substitution of native species by exotic ones have tremendous effects on the survival of native species and the knowledge associated with them, which could be lost forever, thus it needs research into documentation of information about neglected native plants and their uses [60]. Perhaps, documentation of traditional knowledge of native or exotic ethnoveterinary medicinal plant species is crucial as they help in providing herbal materials for the discovery of new low-cost drugs that are environmentally friendly and conservation of biodiversity [19].

In this study, eight ethnoveterinary medicinal plants were reported for the first time in treatment of livestock ailments. These medicinal plants include Capparis fascicularis for treatment of eye, Desmidorchis retrospiciens for constipation, Dombeya torrida for mange, diarrhoea and colic. Erianthemum dregei and Loranthella schimperi for muscle stiffness/ataxia and inappetence, Oreosyce africana for anthrax and equine diseases. Pappea capensis for treatment of new born rejection (poor mothering) in cattle and Persicaria decipiens is used to treat emaciation and remove retained placenta. Thus, these plants need to be studied for their phytochemical constituents and biological activities, which could be important components in future veterinary pharmaceuticals.

Some new ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants are also recorded in the study area. For instance, traditional remedy prepared by concoction of four medicinal plants including Phytolacca dodecandra (leaves), Calpurnia aurea (seed), Cyphostemma cyphopetalum (root) and Verbascum sinaiticum, then mixed with milk or blood and given to dogs, one drop to their left nostril and ear, which is used for prophylaxis against rabies. In some sites, the remedy also formulated from grounded seeds of C. aurea mixed with milk or blood, then given to dogs following the same procedure. According to local people and traditional healers, the remedy is used as traditional vaccine against rabies. The remedy is given to the healthy dog to prevent rabies, which serve at least for one year. As rabies is one of deadly disease in Ethiopia and elsewhere in the world, such medicinal indications are important for its prevention and need further investigations.

Conservation status, threats to ethnoveterinary plants and indigenous knowledge

The conservation status of reported ethnoveterinary medicinal plants were checked on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. According to the IUCN Red List, 20 (31.25%) reported ethnoveterinary medicinal plants are documented in different conservation status, which includes 18 (28.125%) species that are least concern (LC), 2 species that are vulnerable (VU) and data deficient (DD). The remaining 44 medicinal plants are not documented/classified on the IUCN Red List, this might indicates their conservation status not assessed or they have least threats to conservation.

In the study area, the major threats and challenge to medicinal flora are anthropogenic disturbances and ecological degradation as elsewhere in Ethiopia [77], these include expansion of farmlands, overgrazing, deforestation and soil erosion. Most natural land areas have encroached by inhabitants and converted to agricultural lands mainly into mono-cropping system that led to decline in the multipurpose and medicinal plants in the District. Medicinal plants are also highly affected by overgrazing as large livestock population are freely grazing in Acacia woodland, wooded grassland and wetlands, by reducing their regeneration ability. The other important threats are cutting trees for various purposes (firewood, charcoal and construction), urbanization, infrastructure construction and mineral mining. The lack of conservation practices in cultivating of medicinal plants and harvesting from the wild have also led to deterioration of medicinal resources. Similarly, ethnoveterinary knowledge associated with medicinal plants are also being threatened by aforementioned threats coupled with acculturation, weakening of social structures, secrecy, verbal modes of knowledge transfer and difficulty in understanding the knowledge. Nowadays, application of ethnoveterinary knowledge has decreased in the study area due to increase of modern drugs and education, weak interaction of young generation with traditional societies and natural environments. Therefore, to sustain and conserve ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and associated indigenous knowledge, it need revitalization of traditional institution like Gada system for biodiversity conservation, which prohibit cutting of respected plants in Gada practicing areas (Arda Jila/Malka) and sacred place in the study area. Furthermore, awareness creation among local inhabitants, women and young generation about ethnoveterinary medicinal plant knowledge. And developing medicinal plants utilization strategies, integration into modern livestock health care and promulgation policies in coordination with various stakeholders [21, 77].

Conclusions

The study revealed that the people of Dugda District are endowed with rich ethnoveterinary knowledge, practices and medicinal plants. As a result, a total of 64 medicinal plants were identified and documented along with their detailed veterinary uses and to be used to treat a wide ranges of livestock ailments. Anthrax, inappetence and diarrhoea were the most prevalent and treat by large number of medicinal plants. The study also showed that ethnoveterinary knowledge of medicinal plants have a remarkable value to deal with these livestock health problems, particularly in areas with limited access to modern pharmaceuticals and rural poor populations. Family Fabaceae was the most important in ethnoveterinary uses (7 spp.), followed by Apocynaceae, Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae (5 spp. each) and Malvaceae and Vitaceae (4 spp. each). Herbs were the most dominant life forms (21 spp.), followed by shrubs (20 spp.). Leaves (55.25%) were the most sought plant part in ethnoveterinary remedy formulation. The principal method of remedies preparation was pounding remedial parts (46.85%), and mixing with cold water. The main route of administration was via oral application (72.67%), by drenching diseased livestock. Withania somnifera and Kedrostis foetidissima were the most cited medicinal plants with 53UR and 43UR, respectively. ICF showed that respiratory diseases scored the highest value (0.94), while most of the reported medicinal plants were gastrointestinal agents. Multipurpose/use diversity analysis revealed that Croton macrostachyus had highest diversity of uses, followed by K. foetidissima and W. somnifera. Ethnoveterinary uses of some medicinal plants such as Phytolacca dodecandra, Calpurnia aurea, Cyphostemma cyphopetalum and Verbascum sinaiticum in rabies prevention were a new input for ethnoveterinary database. Most importantly, majority of medicinal plants were freshly collected from natural habitants (wild); moreover, roots and whole plant parts of some medicinal plants are harvested for ethnoveterinary medications. These in turn have negative implications on conservation of these vitally important ethnoveterinary medicinal plants. Thus, findings of this study could be for conservation of indigenous knowledge and plants diversity. This could be done through implementation of ex situ and in situ conservation actions for medicinal plants, plant biodiversity in general, as these natural resources are being scarce due to several anthropogenic threats, in collaborations with governments, non-governments and traditional institutions (Gada system). The agricultural offices at different levels, education sectors and non-governments institutions should encourage indigenous communities to develop senses of ownership and active participation in sustainable management and conservation of medicinal plant biodiversity. Medicinal plants should be promoted for ethnoveterinary services by ethnobotanists, veterinarians and other stakeholders, so that local communities start to conserve these plants and use for management of livestock ailments. Furthermore, the disparity in ethnoveterinary knowledge tied with medicinal plant species (P < 0.05) between types of informants, age groups and literacy level also infers the conservation of medicinal plants and associated ethnoveterinary knowledge through awareness creation among local communities and revitalization of the knowledge. The reported medicinal plants could also be potential resources for present and future generations in improving livestock and human health problems, food security, strengthening the livelihoods of local communities and alleviating poverty, which indeed needs conservation and sustainable utilization. Lastly, professionals including ethnobotanists, veterinarians, pharmacologists and biochemists should work together to screen ethnoveterinary medicinal plants for their phytochemical constituents, pharmacological properties and toxicity to confirm ethnoveterinary uses and for future development of veterinary pharmaceuticals.

Availability of data and materials

All the data used to support this study are included in the paper.

Abbreviations

GDP:

Gross domestic product

ACB/RV:

Acacia-Commiphora Woodland and bushland land/Rift Valley

AAU:

Addis Ababa University

ETH:

National herbarium

WFO:

World flora online

ICF:

Informant consensus factor

URs:

Use reports

FL:

Fidelity-level index

RI:

Relative importance values

LSD:

Lumpy skin disease

FMD:

Foot and mouth disease

CBPP:

Contagious bovine pleuropneumonia

BEF:

Bovine ephemeral fever

ASH:

African horse sickness

IUCN:

International Union for Conservation of Nature

References

  1. McCorkle C. An introduction to ethnoveterinary research and development. J Ethnobiol. 1986;6:129–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Merwe D, Swan GE, Botha CJ. Use of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in cattle by Setswana-speaking people in the Madikwe area of the North West Province of South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2001;72:189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGaw LJ, Famuyide IM, Khunoana ET, Aremu AO. Ethnoveterinary botanical medicine in South Africa: a review of research from the last decade (2009 to 2019). J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;257:112864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aziz MA, Khan AH, Pieroni A. Ethnoveterinary plants of Pakistan: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McGaw LJ, Eloff JN. Ethnoveterinary use of southern African plants and scientific evaluation of their medicinal properties. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;119:559–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin M, Mathias E, McCorkle CM. Ethnoveterinary medicine: an annotated bibliography of community animal healthcare. Ethnoveterinary Med Annot Bibliogr Community Anim Healthc. 2001.

  7. Wanzala W, Zessin KH, Kyule NM, Baumann MPO, Mathias E, Hassanali A. Ethnoveterinary medicine: a critical review of its evolution, perception, understanding and the way forward. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2005;17.

  8. Herrero M, Grace D, Njuki J, Johnson N, Enahoro D, Silvestri S, et al. The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal. 2013;7:3–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Central Statistics Agency (CSA). Agricultural Sample Survey 2019/20 [2012 E.C.]. Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2020.

  10. Management Entity. Ethiopia’s Livestock Systems: Overview and Areas of Inquiry. Gainesville, FL, USA: Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duguma B. Smallholder livestock production and marketing systems in the Haramaya District, Eastern Ethiopia. Basic Res J Agric Sci Rev. 2013;2:122–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duressa D, Kenea D, Keba W, Desta Z, Berki G, Leta G, et al. Assessment of livestock production system and feed resources availability in three villages of Diga district Ethiopia. ILRI Addis Ababa Ethiop. 2014.

  13. Bekele A, Musa A. Ethnoveterinary practice in Chiro District, western Hararge. Pharmacologyonline: Ethiopia; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fullas F. Ethiopian medicinal plants in veterinary healthcare. A mini-review. Ethiop E-J Res Innov Foresight. 2010;2:48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kidane B, van der Maesen LJG, van Andel T, Asfaw Z. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants used by the maale and ari ethnic communities in Southern Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;153:274–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yineger H, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Lulekal E. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants at Bale Mountains National Park. Ethiopia J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;112:55–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sori T, Bekana M, Adugna G, Kelbessa E. Medicinal plants in the ethnoveterinary practices of Borana pastoralists, Southern Ethiopia. Int J Appl Res Vet Med. 2004;2:220–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giday M, Teklehaymanot T. Ethnobotanical study of plants used in management of livestock health problems by Afar People of Ada’ar District, Afar Regional State. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lulekal E, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Van Damme P. Ethnoveterinary plants of Ankober District, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aerts R, November EJJ, Rayyan M. Improvised hand injury treatment using traditional veterinary medicine in Ethiopia. Wilderness Environ Med. 2017;28:322–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tilahun M, Etifu M, Shewage T. Plant diversity and ethnoveterinary practices of ethiopia: a systematic review. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2019;2019:5276824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yineger H, Yewhalaw D, Teketay D. Plants of veterinary importance in Southwestern Ethiopia: the case of Gilgel Ghibe area. For Trees Livelihoods. 2008;18:165–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maphosa V, Masika PJ. Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants: a survey of plants used in the ethnoveterinary control of gastro-intestinal parasites of goats in the Eastern Cape Province. South Africa Pharm Biol. 2010;48:697–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGaw LJ, Abdalla MA. Ethnoveterinary medicine: present and future concepts. Cham: Springer; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaachouay N, Azeroual A, Bencharki B, Douira A, Zidane L. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants for animal therapy in the Rif, North of Morocco. South Afr J Bot. 2022;147:176–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khunoana ET, Madikizela B, Erhabor JO, Nkadimeng SM, Arnot LF, Van Wyk I, et al. A survey of plants used to treat livestock diseases in the Mnisi community, Mpumalanga, South Africa, and investigation of their antimicrobial activity. South Afr J Bot. 2019;126:21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abebe M. The study of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants at Mojana Wodera district, central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0267447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Asfaw A, Lulekal E, Bekele T, Debella A, Debebe E, Sisay B. Medicinal plants used to treat livestock ailments in Ensaro District, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Regional State. Ethiopia BMC Vet Res. 2022;18:235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Assefa A, Bahiru A. Ethnoveterinary botanical survey of medicinal plants in Abergelle, Sekota and Lalibela districts of Amhara region. North Ethiopia J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;213:340–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eshetu GR, Dejene TA, Telila LB, Bekele DF. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants: preparation and application methods by traditional healers in selected districts of southern Ethiopia. Vet World. 2015;8:674–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Feyera T, Mekonnen E, Wakayo BU, Assefa S. Botanical ethnoveterinary therapies used by agro-pastoralists of Fafan zone. Eastern Ethiopia BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Feyisa M, Kassahun A, Giday M. Medicinal plants used in ethnoveterinary practices in Adea Berga District, Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2021;2021:5641479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yigezu Y, Haile DB, Ayen WY. Ethnoveterinary medicines in Four Districts of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: cross sectional survey for plant species and mode of use. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Friis I, Sebsebe D, van Paulo B. Atlas of the Potential Vegetation of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University Press & Shama Books; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Woldu Z, Fetene M, Abate A. Vegetation under different tree species in Acacia woodland in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 1999;22:235–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Giday M, Asfaw Z, Elmqvist T, Woldu Z. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the Zay people in Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;85:43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Albuquerque UP, da Cunha LVFC, De Lucena RFP, Alves RRN. Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Berlin: Springer; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: A methods manual. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Heinrich M, Edwards S, Moerman DE, Leonti M. Ethnopharmacological field studies: a critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huntington HP. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:1270–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cunningham AB. Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. London, UK: Earthscan; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Edwards S, Tadesse M, Hedberg I. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Canellaceae to Euphorbiaceae Volume 2. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Botany; 1995.

  43. Edwards S, Demissew S, Hedberg I. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Hydrocharitaceae to Arecaceae Volume 6. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala, Sweden; 1997.

  44. Edwards S, Tadesse M, Demissew S, Hedberg I. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Magnoliaceae to Flacourtiaceae Volume 2. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala, Sweden; 2000.

  45. Hedberg I, Edwards S, Nemomissa S. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Apiaceae to Dipsacaceae Volume 4 part 1. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Botany: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2003.

  46. Hedberg I, Friis I, Edwards S. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Asteraceae Volume 4 part 2. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Botany: The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.; 2004.

  47. Hedberg I, Edwards S. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Pittosporaceae to Araliaceae Volume 3. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala, Sweden; 1989.

  48. Phillips S, Hedberg I, Edwards S. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Poaceae Volume 7. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Department of Systematic Botany, Uppsala, Sweden; 1995.

  49. Heinrich M, Lardos A, Leonti M, Weckerle C, Willcox M, Applequist W, et al. Best practice in research: consensus statement on ethnopharmacological field studies – ConSEFS. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;211:329–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Weckerle CS, de Boer HJ, Puri RK, van Andel T, Bussmann RW, Leonti M. Recommended standards for conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;210:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Alexiades MN. Collecting ethnobotanical data: an introduction to basic concepts and techniques. Adv Econ Bot. 1996;10:53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bennett BC, Prance GT. Introduced Plants in the Indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Northern South America. Econ Bot. 2000;54:90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tabuti JRS, Dhillion SS, Lye KA. Ethnoveterinary medicines for cattle (Bos indicus) in Bulamogi county, Uganda: plant species and mode of use. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88:279–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dinbiso TD, Fulasa TT, Deressa FB. Ethnoveterinary practices of medicinal plants used in animal health management in the Dawuro Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Econ Bot. 2022;76:60–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kelbessa E, Demissew S. Diversity of vascular plant taxa of the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2014;13:37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Aziz MA, Khan AH, Adnan M, Ullah H. Traditional uses of medicinal plants used by Indigenous communities for veterinary practices at Bajaur Agency, Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine. 2018;14:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Berhanu M, Tintagu T, Fentahun S, Giday M. Ethnoveterinary survey of medicinal plants used for treatment of animal diseases in Ambo District of Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2020;2020:8816227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hassen A, Muche M, Muasya AM, Tsegay BA. Exploration of traditional plant-based medicines used for livestock ailments in northeastern Ethiopia. South Afr J Bot. 2022;146:230–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Güler O, Polat R, Karaköse M, Çakılcıoğlu U, Akbulut S. An ethnoveterinary study on plants used for the treatment of livestock diseases in the province of Giresun (Turkey). South Afr J Bot. 2021;142:53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Monteiro MVB, Bevilaqua CML, Palha MDC, Braga RR, Schwanke K, Rodrigues ST, et al. Ethnoveterinary knowledge of the inhabitants of Marajó Island, eastern Amazonia, Brazil. Acta Amaz. 2011;41:233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Traoré L, Yaro VSO, Soudré A, Ouédraogo-Koné S, Ouédraogo D, Yougbaré B, et al. Indigenous knowledge of veterinary medicinal plant use in cattle treatment in southwestern Burkina Faso (West Africa). South Afr J Bot. 2020;128:189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Abbasi AM, Khan SM, Ahmad M, Khan MA, Quave CL, Pieroni A. Botanical Ethnoveterinary Therapies in Three Districts of the Lesser Himalayas of Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gakuubi MM, Wanzala W. A survey of plants and plant products traditionally used in livestock health management in Buuri district, Meru County, Kenya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Aziz MA, Adnan M, Khan AH, Sufyan M, Khan SN. Cross-cultural analysis of medicinal plants commonly used in ethnoveterinary practices at South Waziristan Agency and Bajaur Agency, Federally Administrated Tribal Areas (FATA), Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;210:443–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sharma R, Manhas RK. Ethnoveterinary plants for the treatment of camels in Shiwalik regions of Kathua district of Jammu & Kashmir, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;169:170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gradé JT, Tabuti JRS, Van Damme P. Ethnoveterinary knowledge in pastoral Karamoja, Uganda. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;122:273–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Benitez G, González-Tejero MR, Molero-Mesa J. Knowledge of ethnoveterinary medicine in the Province of Granada, Andalusia, Spain. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;139:429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Miara MD, Bendif H, Ouabed A, Rebbas K, Ait Hammou M, Amirat M, et al. Ethnoveterinary remedies used in the Algerian steppe: Exploring the relationship with traditional human herbal medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2019;244:112164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Martinez GJ, Luján MC. Medicinal plants used for traditional veterinary in the Sierras de Córdoba (Argentina): An ethnobotanical comparison with human medicinal uses. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Yirga G, Teferi M, Gidey G, Zerabruk S. An ethnoveterinary survey of medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Seharti-Samre district. North Ethiopia Afr J Plant Sci. 2012;6:113–9.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Raza MA, Younas M, Buerkert A, Schlecht E. Ethno-botanical remedies used by pastoralists for the treatment of livestock diseases in Cholistan Desert. Pak J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151:333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Offiah NV, Makama S, Elisha IL, Makoshi MS, Gotep JG, Dawurung CJ, et al. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the treatment of animal diarrhoea in Plateau State, Nigeria. BMC Vet Res. 2011;7:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Sharma R, Manhas RK, Magotra R. Ethnoveterinary remedies of diseases among milk yielding animals in Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir. India J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141:265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Friedman J, Yaniv Z, Dafni A, Palewitch D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert. Israel J Ethnopharmacol. 1986;16:275–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1859–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tchetan E, Olounlade AP, Houehanou TD, Azando EVB, Kaneho JA, Houinato MRB, et al. Ethnoveterinary knowledge of sheep and goat farmers in Benin (West Africa): effect of socioeconomic and environmental factors. Heliyon. 2021;7:e07656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Temeche MA, Asnakew AT. A review on status of ethnoveterinary medicine and challenges it faces in Ethiopia. Int J Vet Sci Anim Husb. 2020;5:39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  78. da Silva JJM, Campanharo SC, Paschoal JAR. Ethnoveterinary for food-producing animals and related food safety issues: a comprehensive overview about terpenes. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021;20:48–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Banda LJ, Tanganyika J. Livestock provide more than food in smallholder production systems of developing countries. Anim Front. 2021;11:7–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Nigussie D, Davey G, Tufa TB, Brewster M, Legesse BA, Fekadu A, et al. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of ethiopian medicinal plants: a systematic review. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:633921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Chinsembu KC, Negumbo J, Likando M, Mbangu A. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Onayena and Katima Mulilo. Namibia South Afr J Bot. 2014;94:101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Greene AM, Panyadee P, Inta A, Huffman MA. Asian elephant self-medication as a source of ethnoveterinary knowledge among Karen mahouts in northern Thailand. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;259:112823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Menale B, Muoio R. Use of medicinal plants in the South-Eastern area of the Partenio Regional Park (campania, Southern Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;153:297–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Rehman S, Iqbal Z, Qureshi R, Rahman IU, Sakhi S, Khan I, et al. Ethnoveterinary practices of medicinal plants among tribes of Tribal District of North Waziristan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:815294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Xiong Y, Long C. An ethnoveterinary study on medicinal plants used by the Buyi people in Southwest Guizhou, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Amsalu N, Bezie Y, Fentahun M, Alemayehu A, Amsalu G. Use and conservation of medicinal plants by indigenous people of Gozamin Wereda, East Gojjam Zone of Amhara region, Ethiopia: an ethnobotanical approach. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018; 2018.

  87. Chekole G, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in the environs of Tara-gedam and Amba remnant forests of Libo Kemkem District, northwest Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Birhan YS, Kitaw SL, Alemayehu YA, Mengesha NM. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and practices in Enarj Enawga district, East Gojjam zone, Amhara region. Ethiopia Int J Anim Sci. 2018;2:1014.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tadesse A, Tsegay BA, Telake BB. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in rural settings of Bahir Dar district. Ethiopia Ethiop J Sci Technol. 2018;11:223–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Teklehaymanot T, Giday M. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by people in Zegie Peninsula. Northwest Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Teklehaymanot T, Giday M, Medhin G, Mekonnen Y. Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by people around Debre Libanos monastery in Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:271–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Mohammed C, Abera D, Woyessa M, Birhanu T. Survey of ethno-veterinary medicinal plants in Melkabello District, eastern Harerghe zone. East Ethiopia Ethiop Vet J. 2016;20:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tadesse B, Dereje A. Survey of ethno-veterinary medicinal plants at selected Horro Gudurru Districts. West Ethiopia Afr J Plant Sci. 2015;9:185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Abdeta D, Amante M, Tamiru Y. Survey on ethno botany and medicinal animals at Sayo and Hawa Gelan Districts of Kelem Wollega Zone. West Ethiopia Prev Med. 2020;11:12.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Tamene S, Addisu D, Debela E. Ethno-medicinal study of plants in Boricha district: Use, preparation and application by traditional healers. South Ethiopia J Med Plants Res. 2020;14:343–53.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Mesfin F, Demissew S, Teklehaymanot T. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wonago Woreda, SNNPR. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Gebremedhin G, Shewit K, Samson S. An ethno-veterinary survey of medicinal plants in woredas of Tigray region. North Ethiopia Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2013;5:89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Teklay A, Abera B, Giday M. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in Kilte Awulaelo District, Tigray Region of Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Teklay A. Traditional medicinal plants for ethnoveterinary medicine used in Kilte Awulaelo district, Tigray region. Northern Ethiopia Adv Med Plant Res. 2015;3:137–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Kidane L, Gebremedhin G, Beyene T. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Ganta Afeshum District, Eastern Zone of Tigray. North Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14:64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Tahir M, Gebremichael L, Beyene T, Van Damme P. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Adwa District, Central Zone of Tigray Regional State, Northern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021;17:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Araya S, Abera B, Giday M. Study of plants traditionally used in public and animal health management in Seharti Samre District, Southern Tigray. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Yirga G, Teferi M, Brhane G, Amare S. Plants used in ethnoveterinary practices in Medebay-Zana district, northern Ethiopia. J Med Plants Res. 2012;6:433–8.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Teklehaymanot T. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal and edible plants of Yalo Woreda in Afar regional state. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Kitata G, Abdeta D, Amante M. Ethnoknowledge of plants used in veterinary practices in Midakegn district, west showa of Oromia region. Ethiopia J Med Plants Stud. 2017;5:282–8.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Khan A, Nasrallah Khan KA, Rauf A, Patel S. Quantitative Ethno-Veterinary Usage of Plants in the Outskirts of District Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Acta Sci Vet Sci Vol. 2019;1.

  107. Firaol T, Waktole T, Ejigu K, Gizaw D, Rajeeb KR, Mekonnen S. Ethnoknowledge of plants used in veterinary practices in Dabo Hana District. West Ethiopia J Med Plants Res. 2013;7:2960–71.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Agize M, Demissew S, Asfaw Z. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in Loma and Gena bosa districts (woredas) of dawro zone, southern Ethiopia. Topclass J Herb Med. 2013;2:194–212.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kebede E, Mengistu M, Serda B. Ethnobotanical knowledge of pastoral community for treating livestock diseases in Somali regional state, eastern Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2018;50:1379–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Teka A, Asfaw Z, Demissew S, Van Damme P. Medicinal plant use practice in four ethnic communities (Gurage, Mareqo, Qebena, and Silti), south central Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Kassa Z, Asfaw Z, Demissew S. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Sheka Zone of Southern Nations Nationalities and peoples regional state. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine. 2020;16:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Mesfin F, Seta T, Assefa A. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Amaro Woreda. Ethiopia Ethnobot Res Appl. 2014;12:341–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Giday K, Lenaerts L, Gebrehiwot K, Yirga G, Verbist B, Muys B. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants from degraded dry afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia: species, uses and conservation challenges. J Herb Med. 2016;6:96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Seifu T, Asres K, Gebre-Mariam T. Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmaceutical studies on medicinal plants of Chifra district, Afar region. North Eastern Ethiopia Ethiop Pharm J. 2004;24:41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Zenebe G, Zerihun M, Solomon Z. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Asgede Tsimbila district, Northwestern Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2012;10:305–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Mekonnen AB, Mohammed AS, Tefera AK. Ethnobotanical study of traditional medicinal plants used to treat human and animal diseases in Sedie Muja District, South Gondar, Ethiopia. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med ECAM. 2022;2022:7328613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Abera Y, Mulate B. Ethno-veterinary medicine: a potential alternative to animal health delivery in Wolmera district, Oromia Region. Ethiopia Ethiop Vet J. 2019;23:111–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Eshete MA, Molla EL. Traditional medicine practices of Guji Semi-Pastoralist People to treat livestock ailments in Suro Barguda District, West Guji Zone, Ethiopia. Ethnobiol Conserv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2022-08-11.26-1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Megersa M, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Beyene A, Woldeab B. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wayu Tuka District, East Welega Zone of Oromia Regional State. West Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Kefalew A, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in Ada’a District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia Regional State. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Mulugeta K. Diversity, knowledge and use of medicinal plants in Abay Chomen District, Horo Guduru Wollega Zone, Oromia Region of Ethiopia. J Med Plants Res. 2017;11:480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Tolossa K, Debela E, Athanasiadou S, Tolera A, Ganga G, Houdijk JG. Ethno-medicinal study of plants used for treatment of human and livestock ailments by traditional healers in South Omo. Southern Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Kewessa G, Abebe T, Demessie A. Indigenous knowledge on the use and management of medicinal trees and shrubs in Dale District, Sidama Zone. South Ethiopia Ethnobot Res Appl. 2015;14:171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Bekalo TH, Woodmatas SD, Woldemariam ZA. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by local people in the lowlands of Konta Special Woreda, southern nations, nationalities and peoples regional state. Ethiopia J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Fassil A, Gashaw G. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in chiro district, West Hararghe. Ethiopia Afr J Plant Sci. 2019;13:309–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Alemayehu G, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by local communities of Minjar-Shenkora District, North Shewa Zone of Amhara Region. Ethiopia J Med Plants Stud. 2015;3:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Scantlebury CE, Peachey L, Hodgkinson J, Matthews JB, Trawford A, Mulugeta G, et al. Participatory study of medicinal plants used in the control of gastrointestinal parasites in donkeys in Eastern Shewa and Arsi zones of Oromia region. Ethiopia BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Tekle Y. An ethno-veterinary botanical survey of medicinal plants in kochore district of gedeo zone, southern nations nationalities and peoples regional state (snnprs). J Sci Innov Res. 2014;3:433–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Kewessa G, Abebe T, Demissie A. Indigenous knowledge on the use and management of medicinal trees and shrubs in Dale District, Sidama Zone. Southern Ethiopia Ethnobot Res Appl. 2015;14:171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Reta H, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Contribution of traditional farmers for medicinal plant conservation on the farming site in Gozamin District, Amhara Region. Ethiopia Int J Life Sci. 2015;4:24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Wendimu A, Tekalign W, Asfaw B. A survey of traditional medicinal plants used to treat common human and livestock ailments from Diguna Fango district, Wolaita, southern Ethiopia. Nord J Bot. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the local people and traditional healers of Dugda District, Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia, who provided this valuable information about traditional ethnoveterinary knowledge of medicinal plants. Our gratitude also goes to the Dugda District Administration Office, Agricultural Office, Veterinary Clinic, and Kebeles’ leaders for cooperation and providing important veterinary information. We would like to thank Addis Ababa University for financial support and the Ethiopian Public Health Institute for vehicle facilities and per diem during field investigations. Thanks also go to Dr. Abdisa Keshu who helped us in translating description of livestock ailment types into veterinary terms. Finally, we would like also to thank Mr. Samuel Woldekidan and Mr. Samuel Tessema, who helped facilitate field trips during data collection.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Addis Ababa University and Ethiopian Public Health Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BKO conceived and designed the study, performed field work, analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. EL commented on the study design, supervised the study, assisted in plant specimen identification and reviewed the manuscript. BW supervised the study and reviewed the manuscript. ZA commented on the study design, supervised the study and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. AD supervised the study and reviewed the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bula Kere Oda.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The appropriate ethical permission to conduct the research was obtained through a formal letter from Addis Ababa University (AAU) to the Dugda District Authority and local community leaders (Kebeles). Before the interview process, government bodies at district and kebele levels and all informants were briefed about the research objectives and its academic purposes. And then prior informed consent was obtained verbally from each informant before the commencement of the interviews.

Consent for publication

Prior informed consent of informants’ pictures had been obtained for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A1:

See Table 9.

Table 9 List of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in single plant remedy preparations/formulations

Appendix A2

See Table 10.

Table 10 List of ethnoveterinary medicinal plants in poly-herbal remedy preparations/formulations

Appendix A3

See Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Photograph of sacred tree in the visited study area, informants demonstrating medicinal plant, woodland as sources of medicinal plants and widely used medicinal plant (Withania somnifera) respectively

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oda, B.K., Lulekal, E., Warkineh, B. et al. Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and their utilization by indigenous and local communities of Dugda District, Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 20, 32 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00665-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00665-0

Keywords