Skip to main content

Man-animal relationships in Central Nepal



Nepal is small in size but rich in bio-cultural diversity. The rugged terrain of the country is home to a number of unique assemblages of fauna, some of which are endemic. Not only faunal resources the country also harbors some very ancient populations whose interrelationship with these diverse faunal resources is very intimate and thus demands scientific study. Animals play important role in both material and spiritual spheres of their life. There are more than hundred groups of such populations in the country and the group Tamang is one of these. The present paper studies Tamang-animal relationships in central Nepal.

There is a growing trend of scientific ethnozoological studies all across the globe, but this field is yet in its infancy in Nepal. The country is losing important fauna as well as ancient human cultures at the advent of development processes. As a result, ethnozoological knowledge is also teetering on the brink of extinction.


Ethnozoological data were collected by applying different participatory approaches techniques such as semi-structured interviews, participatory rural appraisal, key informant interviews and focus group discussions.

Quantitative data were obtained by employing a household level questionnaire survey. Data were collected from the period of September 2004 to August 2005.

Most of the animals were identified up to the species level with the help of standard taxonomic keys.


The Tamang community treasures knowledge on various uses of 41 genera belonging to 28 families. Out of total number of animals, 14.6% belong to the Invertebrate group and the rest to the Vertebrate group. Of the total uses 58% fall in the food and medicinal use category, 16% in the magico-religious use category, 18% in the category of omen indication, and 2% each in the categories such as weather forecasting, trophy, ethnomusical and taboos.


The Tamang maintain strong ties with animals both at a material as well as spiritual level. While some animals are the sources of important traditional medicines, others are omen indicators and weather forecasters. High priority should be given in conservation of those animals which are of high consensus value to the community.


Mankind's relationship with animals has been intimate right from the beginning of civilization. Animals have been playing an important role in human economy, culture, religion and magico-religion. Human beings, especially the ancient or the ethnic people, in turn have been maintaining a healthy natural environment by making prudent use of the surrounding biological resources. There is a recent trend of erosion of this type of age-old man-animal relationship because of the loss of animal resources primarily due to rapid urbanization. Nevertheless, the world's high biodiversity areas are found in the land of ancient populations even now [1].

Animals, whether domestic or wild, have always been providing a number of goods and services to human beings. Wildlife provides protein and other necessary food materials to the rural communities in 62 countries of the developing world [24]. Besides this, animal and animal derived products have always been sources of traditional and modern medicines. Even now, animal parts and products such as bile, excreta, urine, endo and exo-skeletal parts, skin and viscera all form important parts of the traditional pharmacopoeia across the globe [513]. So far as modern medicine is concerned, it is reported that more than half of the world's modern drugs are of biological sources [14, 15]. Of the 252 essential chemicals that have been selected by World Health Organization, 8.7% come from animal sources [15].

Animals occupy an important position in culture and religion of traditional societies all over the world. In this context, many of the useful animals are given sacred status because of their important roles in human culture and religion. Examples could be cited of various domestic cow species which are worshipped by the traditional Hindu societies on a regular basis in recognition of their values to mankind [16]. Not only this, even products such as excreta and urine of these animals are smeared in the floor areas of their houses with a belief that these products would sanctify their dwellings. Similarly, certain body parts such as the horn, hide, tail and feathers of some other species of animals are used in their religious rituals as well.

Traditional societies use a number of animals in their magico-religious sphere. Normally animal parts and products such as the exoskeleton, bone and glandular secretions are used as pendants and amulets to ward off the perceived evil spirits. In many places it is a common practice to offer animal sacrifices to appease specific deities and ancestral spirits. The sacrificial offerings are regarded as gifts to the deities that are supposed to maintain health and general well-being of those involved in the process [17, 18].

Some animals indicate omens and forecast future weather conditions to the traditional societies of different places [1921].

The Eastern Himalaya - a region spanning Nepal, Bhutan, north-eastern India, Tibet and far-north of Burma, is known as a global biodiversity hotspot. Nepal, though small in size is thus rich in biodiversity. The presence of valleys, gorges, mountain cliffs, rivers and rivulets within a small area of the country has further contributed to a number of specific niches, which harbor unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Such specific habitats also harbor quite a few numbers of endemic species of fauna and flora. The country though small in size is thus home to an estimated 300 spp. of mammals, 977 spp. of birds, 176 spp. of reptiles, 105 spp. of amphibians and 269 spp. of freshwater fish [22].

Co-existing with such unique and varied flora and fauna in the difficult mountain terrain are a number of ancient groups of people popularly called ethnic groups. Like other ancient populations of the world, these people too have been interacting with the surrounding biological resources through ages to fulfill their material and spiritual needs.

Much of the historical and contemporary indigenous knowledge of numerous ethnic groups around the world is at as much risk of being lost; as is the case with biodiversity [23]. Nepal is not an exception to this ground reality. Deforestation is resulting in an increasing loss of habitats for birds, wild animals and reptiles. IUCN reported that 24 species of mammals, 9 species of reptiles, 27 species of birds, 2 species of insects and 13 species of plants have become endangered in Nepal till now [24]. Also, there is a gradual loss of varied human cultures, where such knowledge is deeply rooted. Very low population share of 0.05% and 0.02% of two of such ethnic groups namely Pahari and Jirel respectively is indicative of their fragile and vulnerable status [25].

In view of an increasing relevance of the ethnobiological knowledge all across the globe, scientific study of such valuable knowledge has just made its beginning in Nepal. Ethnozoogical research in the country has often been much neglected in comparison to ethnobotanical research. That is why a number of scientists in the country have emphasized for a strong need for the scientific study and documentation of such a valuable and ever relevant body of ethnozoological knowledge [26]. Hence, the present work is aimed at studying the interrelationship that exists between animal resources and a small group of people belonging to the ethnic group Tamang from the Central Mountainous region of Nepal. A database of ethnozoological knowledge can also serve as baseline data for further research in the country. Animals that have more use values are often the most exploited ones and thus the most threatened [27]. The present work would also draw attention of the concerned authorities on keeping such animal resources in the highest priority of conservation. Also, since higher percentages of animals in this study are of food and medicinal value, the work would be all the more important especially at a time when modern medicine is turning towards animal parts, products, and secretions to cure humans.


Study area

Nepal is a small mountainous country with an area of only 147,181 sq km expanding along the central and eastern Himalaya. The country is 885 km long from east to west and 193 km broad from south to north. Within a horizontal expanse of less than 200 km the altitudinal height of the country in the south north direction varies from less than 100 m to 8848 m (Mt. Everest). Sharp altitudinal variations within a small expanse of land have given rise to specific land pockets and varied climatic conditions. All these conditions in turn have contributed to the diverse and unique assemblages of flora and fauna. Biodiversity in the country has emanated from other factors as well besides altitudinal variations. The country is located along the central and eastern Himalaya encompassing two zoogeographical realms - the Palaerctic and the Oriental. The northern part of the country harbors Palaerctic fauna and flora whereas the southern part is the homeland of Oriental biological elements. The central part or the part between these two realms however, shows mixed faunal and floral elements of both the realms. This part of the country harbors many of the ethnic groups of the country. The group Tamang is one of the ethnic groups of the region

The present research work was conducted on the Tamangs of the two villages in the central mountainous part of the country. These villages belonged to the two Village Development Committees (hereafter called VDC) Thumpakhar and Thulopakhar of the district Sindhupalchok of the region (Figure 1). The work was carried out by the author as a part of her PhD research project from September 2004 - January 2005.

Figure 1
figure 1

The study site in the map of Nepal.

The majority of the Tamangs are scattered in the high altitude areas between 1500 meters to 2500 meters in the central mountainous region of the country. Of the two study VDCs Thumpakhar holds just 737 Tamang populations whereas the other VDC Thulopakhar harbors 2370 of them. The Tamang constitute 5.64% of the total population of the country [25]. They believe that they originally came from Tibet. They speak Tibeto Burman language and follow Buddhist religion. In their language "Ta" means horse and "mang" means trader indicating that they were horse traders in the ancient time [28]. Like other ethnic groups of the country, Tamangs also used to hold "kipat" - a kind of land tenure system where land management was carried by various clans of their own until a few decades ago. This system is now replaced by a modern system of land tenure with taxing arrangements. The Tamangs show respect towards surrounding biological resources. They do so in recognition to the role these resources have been playing in maintaining the ecological balance of the vicinity. One of the examples where their reverence towards the resources can be clearly understood is "Bhumi Puja" where "mother earth" is worshipped in the name of a deity. Such worship or "puja" is usually performed once a year where the animal sacrificial activities become important part of the ceremony. These people also show respect and thus worship their ancestral spirits (Shamanism). Normally "Bompo" the Tamang priest propitiates the spirits whenever necessary. The Tamangs have a tradition of choosing one of the senior members from their community as their leader. The leader of the village is called "mulmi" who takes important decision for the entire community and even settles minor disputes in the village. Most of the Tamangs are non-vegetarians and thus raise poultry and goats in their house. Besides poultry and mammals, they also relish smaller animals especially amphibians such as frogs and toads. But while eating these animals they have to abide by certain traditional rules. These rules restrict cooking of these animals inside the house. They can however, bring already cooked meat of these animals inside the house and eat it [28]. Similar rules have to be followed by those who wish to eat pork and buffalo meat in their house.

Socioeconomic profile of the community

a. Family size: Family size of the community is 7.8 +- 0.8 (Figure 2) which is greater than the district average of 5.06 [29].

Figure 2
figure 2

Average family size together with average male and female number in Tamang community. Source of data is questionnaire survey (n = 81). Mid-points in the vertical lines in the figure denote average values, whereas the lines represent confident limits of the means at 95% significance level.

b. Education status: 54% of the Tamangs are literate out of which almost 33% have attained only primary education (Figure 3). The literacy rate is higher than that of the district average of 40.6% and almost equal to the literacy rate of the country which is 54.1 for the year 2001[29].

Figure 3
figure 3

Education status of Tamang group based on questionnaire survey (n = 81). Illiterate = who cannot read and write, Primary level = grade one to five, Lower secondary level = grade six and seven, Secondary level = grade eight to ten, Higher secondary level or Intermediate level = grade eleven and twelve and above = bachelor and higher level.

c. Economic activities: The Tamangs primarily live upon scale agriculture for their livelihood. Average land holding size/family is 0.67 ha. People (in percentages) with different land holding sizes are clear from Figure 4. Main crops are paddy, wheat, maize, millet and potato. Paddy dominates other crops with its highest per year production yield.

Figure 4
figure 4

Per family land holding in hectare in Tamang group (n = 81).

Other economic activities of the community besides agriculture are wage earning (46%), business (19%), service (9%) and other unspecified sectors as illustrated by Figure 5. Among these 7% of them are students and 17% are without other economic activities besides agriculture.

Figure 5
figure 5

Percentages of people with other economic activities besides agriculture (n = 81).

d. Animal husbandry: Livestock unit/family (only cow, ox, buffalo and sheep/goat are calculated) is 3.8 +- .07 (1 cattle = 1 unit, 1 buffalo = 1.5 units, 1 goat/sheep = 0.2 unit). Per family livestock composition of the group is illustrated by Figure 6. Livestock raising is integral to their agriculture based economy. It is linked with agriculture for there is constant flow of energy in the form of manure from livestock to the farm. Oxen are used to plough the rugged terrain of the area. About 59% of the families have raised oxen for this purpose. Livestock also provides protein to them. Almost 89% of the respondents have kept goats in their house. Distress selling of the goats is a common practice. Only 49% of the families are involved in buffalo rearing for milk, meat and manure. Cows are kept by only 28% of them. It is interesting to note that not a single family has reared pigs for pork eating is a taboo among the Tamangs. Those who wish to eat pork will have to manage to cook it elsewhere instead of cooking it in the regular kitchen of the house.

Figure 6
figure 6

Per family livestock number (n = 81).

Data collection

Both qualitative and quantitative methods were adopted in the present study. Quantitative data were obtained by employing a household level questionnaire survey. For this, 13% households (81 households) were selected by a simple random sampling technique out of 621 households. The sample was thought to be a representative one for a culturally homogenous group. The survey was conducted to find out information on family size, land holding size and number and types of livestock raised, literacy status and other economic activities. The head of the household was interviewed for the survey. The most preferred livestock to the community was identified from the data on animal husbandry and the economic condition of the group was assessed from the socioeconomic data.

Ethnozoological data were collected by applying different techniques of participatory approaches such as semi-structured interviews, participatory rural appraisal, key informant interviews and focus group discussions.

Most of the animals were identified up to the species level but a few could be identified only up to generic level. Larger animals were identified according to the folk description of each specimen and from the pictures shown to them. Standard taxonomic keys of taxonomists from home and abroad were used to make correct identification of the animals [3035]. Ethnozoological data were presented in a tabular form under the headings such as common English name, zoological name, local name and a brief ethnozoological note. Popularity of the animal uses was assessed from the data on consensus indices.

Results and discussion

Ethnozoological data

Table 1 given in the article shows the animal use patterns of the Tamangs. Ethnozoological knowledge of the studied community reveals various uses of 41 genera belonging to 28 families. Out of total number of animals, 14.6% belong to the Invertebrate group and the rest to the Vertebrate group. Of the total uses 58% fall in the food and medicinal use category, 16% in the magico-religious use category, 18% in the category of omen indication, and 2% each in the categories such as weather forecasting, trophy, ethnomusical and taboos.

Table 1 Animals with their uses in the study group Tamang

Food and medicinal animals

Since there is overlapping of food and medicinal values in case of many animals, both these use categories are kept under single heading of "Food and medicinal animals". It is found that 68% of the animals (n = 81) both vertebrates and invertebrates are of food and medicinal values. Animals such as Apis spp., Schizothorax spp., Paa spp., snakes spp., Gallus sp., Lepus sp., Ovis sp., Histrix spp. have both food and medicinal values. Animals such as slugs, Pheretima spp., Sturnus spp., Myophonus spp., Spilornis spp. are of only medicinal value and are eaten either cooked or raw. Wildlife has been playing an important role in minimizing the existing protein gap in different parts of the world. It has been reported that rural populations from at least 62 countries have been obtaining protein and other essential food supplements from wildlife [36]. Overlapping of food and medicinal uses is a common finding from India and other parts of the world [3743]. Such animals with dual role are all the more important for these not only heal the ailment but also provide nourishing food item to boost up the immune system. One of the animals with double role among the invertebrates is Pheretima spp. Mass production of such animal spp. will form important source of ethnomedicine as well as protein supplement to the people. Healing with earthworm is an ancient practice and is still in popular among many traditional societies in Asia [39, 40].

Both wild and domestic animals are sources of traditional medicines. In this study, we found that parts and products of four domestic animals such as domestic cow, buffalo and sheep are used in healing while the rest are from the wild animal resources. Domestic animals are sources of traditional medicine to both human and livestock in a number of Mediterranean countries besides Nepal [44].

Method of preparation and application of zootherapeutics vary according to the animals and the ailments to be treated. In the cases of animals such as Schizothorax spp. and Hystrix spp. targets are made on their ingested food rather than on their parts or products. These animals are killed merely for their alimentary canal that remains packed with ingested fresh plant materials such as algae and herbs which are then boiled in water and the soup is consumed to get rid of asthma and other respiratory problems. Porcupine (Hystrix spp.) is believed to eat Himalayan herbs of medicinal value. This is a unique case of phytotherapy where animals are used to obtain targeted medicinal herbs.

Raw blood of a bird (Sturnus sp.) is considered to be of tremendous zootherapeutic potential in curing blood dysentery. It is obvious here that the Tamang try to compensate blood loss due to dysentery by the intake of avian blood. There are also reports of healing with raw blood from other parts of the world [39].

Bile from mammals such as the domestic cow (Bos spp.), buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), sloth bear (Melurus ursinus) and porcupine (Hystrix spp.) is used in burns, wounds, cuts, gastritis and stomach related problems, typhoid, fever and asthma. It has been reported that the alkaline nature of bile helps in regulating the body temperature [45]. In many Asian countries, bear bladder is considered to be very useful in digestive illnesses. Bear bile has been very popular in Traditinal Chinese Medicine for thousands of years [46].

Fat of mammals is usually used as a topical ointment to heal cracked skin, burns, rheumatism and arthritis. Similar types of applications of mammalian fat have also been reported in India and abroad [47, 48].

Alcohol prepared by fermenting the mixture of jackal flesh and local cereals, also called "Jackal alcohol", is very popular with high a citation frequency and is given to patients with gout and arthritis. This is a unique case of zootherapy prevalent in Nepal. There are no known reports of similar kinds of zootherapy from other parts of the world.

Animals in a Magico-religious sphere

Animal parts and products such as bones and claws of the wall lizard (Hemidactylus spp.) and serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela), bones, claws and whiskers of tiger (Panthera tigris), and musk of musk deer (Moschus spp.), are used in making charms and tied round the neck and arm to ward off perceived "evil and disease causing elements". Faith healers use the tail of Himalayan cow- Yak (Bos spp.) and horns of deer (Cervus unicolor) in their faith healing therapy. Tiger milk (Panthera tigris) is believed to prevent further propagation of fire in the village. In this way, the Tamang animal relationship is observed not only at the material level but also at a spiritual level. Relationships of the tribal people with the animals at the spiritual/cultural level is reported from different parts of the developing world [49, 50].

Animals in omen indication, and weather forecast

Crossing of the road by snakes and cats of any species indicates a bad omen. Similarly, flying of Gyps fulvus above the house predicts death of one of the members of the house. Unusual sounds like "hoon-hoon" of Bubo bubo and the laughing sound of fish owl (Ketupa spp.) and howling of fox (Vulpes vulpes) predict bad news for the family of the vicinity. The villagers believe that such a sound could even lead to the death of a close relative of the family. Domestic animals such as cats and dogs indicate omens which could be good or bad depending upon their particular activity at different times. When the Serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela) makes a shrill sound instead of its usual sound, it indicates rainfall in the near future. Similar reports of weather forecasting by birds and insects are available from India and abroad [21, 51].

Ethnomusical animals and animal parts used as trophy

Skin of Muntiacus muntjac is used in making a kind of musical instrument called "Damphu" by the community. Deer horn Cervus unicolor is kept in the house of some of the Tamangs as an object of decoration.


It is believed that if someone kills the swallow (Hirundo rustica), the killer is sure to suffer from leprosy. Similar kinds of taboos are reported from other parts of Nepal. It is a taboo to kill the female animal (especially gravid females) among the inhabitants in the northern trans-Himalayan part of the country [52]. This kind of taboo regarding killing of the female animals ultimately contributes to their conservation. These activities could even be referred to as ancient peoples' built-in resource conservation mechanism.

Commercial utilization of some of the new drugs of animal origin could raise poor socioeconomic status of the communities from where the knowledge originated. Priorities should be given to research on such animals. Sustainable use of some of the endangered animals is possible only when their number increases. Possibilities of in-situ conservation of such animals need to be explored. Both systems of knowledge such as traditional and modern should be integrated for the formulation of appropriate policy regarding conservation of such animals.


The Tamangs harbor a rich body of ethnozoological knowledge because of an intimate relationship over a long period of time. Animals are integral to their culture, religion, magico-religion and traditional pharmacopoeia. In other words, Tamang-animal relationship can be observed both at material and spiritual levels. Body parts/tissues such as alimentary canal, gall bladder, fat, bone, blood, claws, whiskers, are normally used in healing. Endo and exoskeletal parts are usually worn as pendants and amulets to ward off perceived evil elements. Even when the Tamangs have access to modern health care modalities, some of the zootherapeutic practices still remain prevalent in the village. This is a clear indication of their faith in the animal-derived medicine. They still prefer to use alcohol obtained from the fermented mixture of jackal flesh and locally grown cereal to treat gout and arthritis. Similarly, animals such as slug spp., earthworm spp., frog spp., and some of the bird spp. are sources of ethnomedicine to the group till now. This is not limited to wild animals - even domestic animals such as cattle, buffalo, sheep and goats provide useful zootherapeutic remedies to them. The Tamangs hold taboos of killing some animal spp. This type of notion towards animals is often of considerable significance for it contributes to their conservation.

Human-animal relationships at all levels needs to be maintained for the overall development (both physical and mental) of human beings. Conservation of not only biodiversity but also of cultural diversity is necessary for this. Advanced research on animals of excessive medicinal values such as Pheretima sp, slugs, M. caeruleus, Hystrix spp., C. aurius, M. ursinus can lead to new sources of drugs.


  1. Alcorn JB: Is Biodiversity conserved by Indigenous Peoples?. Ethnobiology in Human Welfare. Edited by: Jain SK. 1996, Deep Publications, New Delhi, 233-238.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Begossi A: Food taboos - a scientific reason?. Plants for Food and Medicine. Edited by: Pendergast HDV, Etkin N, Harris DR, Houghton PJ. 1998, Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew, UK, 41-461.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Santana GG: The Role of Animal-derived Remedies as Complementary Medicine in Brazil. BioScience. 2007, 57 (11): 949-955. 10.1641/B571107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lev E: Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnophamacol. 2003, 85: 107-118. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00377-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines?. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005, 1: 1-5. 10.1186/1746-4269-1-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa-Neto EM: Healing with animals in Feira de Santana City, Bahia, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 65: 225-230. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00158-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: From cnidarians to mammals: The use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107: 259-276. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Zootherapeutic practices among fishing communities in North and Northeast Brazil: A comparison. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111: 82-103. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.10.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Zootherapy goes to town: The use of animal-based remedies in urban areas of NE and N Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 113: 541-555. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kakati LN, Ao B, Doulo V: Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use of vertebrate origin by the Ao tribe of Nagaland. Hum Ecol. 2006, 19: 163-167.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP: Animals and their products utilized as medicines by the inhabitants surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006, 2 (46): 1-

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP: Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: A review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008, 4: 17-10.1186/1746-4269-4-17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet?. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007, 3: 1-10.1186/1746-4269-3-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. WEHAB: A Framework for Action on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management. The WEHAB Working Group, August 2002. []

  15. Marques JGW: Fauna medicinal: recurso fo ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade?. Mutum. 1997, 1: 4-

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramakrishnan PS, et al: Conserving the Sacred: Ecological and policy implications. Communities and Conservation. Edited by: Kothari A. 1998, Sage Publications; New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  17. Florcrzak KL: An exploration of the concept of sacrifice. Nursing Science Quarterly. 2004, 17 (3): 195-200. 10.1177/0894318404266423. []

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neto NAL, Brooks SE, Alves RRN: From Eshu to Obatala: animals used in sacrificial rituals at Candomble "terreiros" in Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 23-10.1186/1746-4269-5-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma SK: Ethnobotany. 1998, Udaipur Delhi: Himanshu Publications

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nasru : A preliminary report of the relationship between Mongolian people and insects. Proceedings: Challenges of Ethnobiology in the 21st Century. Second Ethnobiology Congres. 1990, China

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hembrom PP: Biological observations help Mundas in weather forecast. Ethnobiology in Human Welfare. Edited by: Jain SK. 1996, Deep Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  22. WWF: New species discoveries 2009. []

  23. Linden E: Lost tribes, lost knowledge. Time. 1991, 23: 46-56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Planning Commission (NPC): The Ninth Plan (1997-2002). 1998, Kathmandu: NPC Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  25. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS): National Population Census 2001, Nepal. 2001, Kathmandu: National Planning Commission Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lohani U, Rajbhandari K, Katre S: Need for systematic ethnozoological studies in the conservation of ancient knowledge systems of Nepal - a review. Ind J Trad Knowl. 2008, 7: 634-637.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Costa-Neto EM: Animal-based medicines: biological prospection and sustainable use of zootherapeutic resources. Annals Braz Acad Sci. 2005, 77 (1): 33-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bista DB: People of Nepal. 2000, Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Seventh

    Google Scholar 

  29. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS): Tathyanka Gatibidhi. 2005, Kathmandu: National Planning Commission, 26 (2):

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thapa VK: Enumeration of spiders. 1995, Kathmandu: Biodiversity Profiles Project Publication

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thapa VK: An inventory of Nepal's insects (Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera). 2000, Kathmandu: IUCN

    Google Scholar 

  32. Flemming RL, Flemming RL, Bangdel LS: Birds of Nepal. 1979, Kathmandu: Avalok, Second

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shah KB, Tiwari S: Herpetofauna of Nepal - A Conservation Companion. 2004, Kathmandu: IUCN

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shrestha J: Fishes of Nepal. 1981, Kathmandu: CDC, Tribhuvan University

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shrestha TK: Mammals of Nepal. Edited by: Bimala Shrestha. 1997, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alves RRN: Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 1-10.1186/1746-4269-5-1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kakati LN, Doulo V: Indigenous knowledge system of zootherapeutic use by Chakhesang tribe of Nagaland, India. J Hum Ecol. 2002, 13: 419-423.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Solovan A, Paulmurugan R, Wilsanand V, Singh RAJA: Traditional therapeutic uses of animals among tribal population of Tamil Nadu. Ind J Trad Knowl. 2004, 3: 198-205.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jamir NS, Lal P: Ethnozoological practices among Naga tribes. Ind J Trad Knowl. 2005, 4: 100-104.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Fx, Guo B, Wang HY: The spermatocidal effects of earthworm extract and its effective constituents. Soil Biol Biochem. 1992, 24: 1247-1251. 10.1016/0038-0717(92)90101-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosner F: Pigeons as a remedy for jaundice. New York State J Med. 1992, 92: 189-192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma VP: The relevance of traditional animal drugs of bird origin used by Bhil tribals of Rajasthan State. Geobiaos News Rep. 1987, 6: 129-132.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sharma VP, Khan AU: The ethnomedico zoological drugs of bird origin used by Garo tribals, Meghalaya. Annals Forestry. 1995, 3 (2): 1-

    Google Scholar 

  44. Quave CL, Lohani U, Verde A, Fajardo J, Rivera D, Obo'n C, Valdes A, Pierone A: A comparative assessment of zootherapeutic remedies from selected areas in Albania, Italy, Spain and Nepal. J Ethnobiol. 2010, 30 (1): 92-125. 10.2993/0278-0771-30.1.92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ghosh AK, Maiti PK: Investigation of some animal drugs (Mammals) used by the tribal people in India. Ethnobiology in Human Welfare. Edited by: Jain SK. 1996, Deep Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  46. Feng Y, Siu K, Wang N, Ng KM, Tsao SW, Nagamatsu T, Tong Y: Bear bile: dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection. J Ethnobiol and Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 2-10.1186/1746-4269-5-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hanazaki N, Alves RRN, Begossi A: Hunting and use of terrestrial fauna used by Caicaras from the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 36-10.1186/1746-4269-5-36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Borang A: Studies on certain ethnozoological aspects of Adi tribes of Siang district, A.P. India. Arunachal Forest News. 1996, 14: 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alves RRN, Léo Neto NAL, Santana GG, Vieira WLS, Almeida WO: Reptiles used for medicinal and magic religious purposes in Brazil. Applied Herpetolog. 2009, 6: 257-274. 10.1163/157075409X432913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Solanki GS, Chutia P: Ethnozoological and sociocultural aspects of Monpas of Arunachal Pradesh. J Hum Ecol. 2004, 15: 251-254.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nasru : A preliminary report of the relationship between Mongolian people and insects. Proceedings: Challenges of Ethnobiology in the 21st Century. 1990, Second Ethnobiology Congress, China

    Google Scholar 

  52. Shah KB: Culture is conservation. Habitat Himalaya. A resources Himalaya Factfile IX No. II. 2002, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The author would like to thank University Grant Commission, Nepal for providing financial support and Tribhuvan University, Nepal for granting leave for the research. Thanks are also due to the Tamangs who shared their valuable traditional knowledge with the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usha Lohani.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohani, U. Man-animal relationships in Central Nepal. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 6, 31 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: