Skip to main content

The use of the head louse as a remedy for jaundice in Spanish folk medicine: an overview



In Spain, head lice are considered a therapeutic resource for the treatment of jaundice. All folk remedies based on the ingestion of these insects meet in the present document, previously dispersed among a large number of references.


An overview of the Spanish literature has been carried out. The most important databases have been consulted. All related works have been examined.


Although the method of preparation is diverse and the dose varies, the primary recommendation is a transference ritual consisting of taking nine live lice for nine days on an empty stomach without the patient’s knowledge. This traditional knowledge survives in Spanish society, and constitutes an example of the interrelation between Spanish and Latin American folk medicines.


The survival of this therapy in the worldview of certain rural communities suggests the need to take into account the beliefs, ideas and behaviour patterns of popular culture in relation to health and disease.

Resumen (in Spanish)


En España, los piojos de la cabeza son considerados un recurso terapéutico para el tratamiento de la ictericia. Todos los remedios populares basados en la ingestión de estos insectos se reúnen en el presente documento, previamente dispersos por un gran número de referencias.


Se ha llevado a cabo una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura española y han sido consultadas las bases de datos más importantes. Se han examinado todos los trabajos relacionados.


Aunque el método de preparación es diverso y la dosis varía, la recomendación principal es un ritual de transferencia consistente en tomar nueve piojos vivos durante nueve días en ayunas y sin el conocimiento del paciente. Este conocimiento tradicional sobrevive en la sociedad española, y constituye un ejemplo de la interrelación entre las medicinas populares española y latinoamericana.


La supervivencia de esta terapia en la cosmovisión de algunas comunidades rurales sugiere la necesidad de tener en cuenta las creencias, ideas y patrones de comportamiento de la cultura popular en relación con la salud y la enfermedad.


Entomotherapy, understood as the use of insects or products derived from them for the treatment of human diseases [1], is currently one of the main focuses of ethnozoological research. Many authors have reported inventories of useful taxa, for example in Brazil more than 80 insect species are described [2], but they also document the importance of these animals in folk medicine, especially in rural areas. This is why research projects have been implemented in certain ethnic groups, human communities or cultures in which the use of medicinal insects and traditional knowledge about such species remain in force despite the risk of their attrition and risk of eventual disappearance [3, 4].

Jaundice is not a disease but an external sign of an underlying pathological process that interferes with the normal functioning of the metabolism and excretion of bilirubin [57]. However, since antiquity it has been described as such–see Blánquez 1966 [8]–and folk medicine has treated jaundice using a wide variety of remedies from time immemorial. In Spain, according to George M. Foster [9], there are three main methods of healing jaundice: urinating on certain plant species, watching the water running on the bank of a river or stream, and drinking water containing human lice (Pediculus humanus Linnaeus, 1758). Among organisms of this taxon of blood-sucking insects (Phthiraptera: Anoplura: Pediculidae), two subspecies are differentiated: P. humanus humanus Linnaeus, 1758 (the body louse) and P. humanus capitis De Geer, 1778 (the head louse) [10, 11]. Populations of these two lice can be separated based on a few morphological features, but mostly on the basis of certain behavioural and ecological differences. Head lice live and feed exclusively on the scalp, whereas body lice live on clothing and only move to the skin to feed [10, 12, 13]. This ecological differentiation arose when humans adopted frequent use of clothing [14]. In addition, molecular studies [15, 16] confirm that head and body lice are conspecific, despite their differences. This point raises the first question: what subspecies is used as a medical remedy for jaundice? In 1929 Gárate [17] wrote: “… D. Miguel de Unamuno told me that several Pediculi capitis were poured into a glass, were crushed and water was added…” Subsequently, in 1972, Donostia clarifies that “live lice, taken from a clean and disease free head” are used [18]. These two direct references are sufficient to exclusively consider the use of head lice for the treatment of jaundice.

The life cycle of the head louse has three stages: egg, nymph, and adult. Adults are small (2.1–3.3 mm long), dorso-ventrally flattened and entirely wingless. Females can lay about 7 eggs per day, gluing nits to the base of human hair. To survive, adult lice need to feed on blood several times daily [10, 12, 13].

The objective of this paper is to collect in one document all traditional remedies used against jaundice based on the intake of adult head lice within the realm of Spanish folk medicine. These remedies, just as for other animal species, are scattered among countless references (many of which are inaccessible to the general public). It also analyzes the validity and geographical distribution of this therapeutic resource in Spain, and its relationship with the traditional medicine of other cultures.


To get the maximum number of documentary sources, a qualitative systematic review of international and national databases was carried out. The international databases ISI Web of Science and Anthropology Plus were consulted. Domestic resources that were referenced include the database of Doctoral Theses TESEO, databases of the information system of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) and bibliographic web Dialnet. The overall search pattern covered the title, abstract and key words concerning ethnozoology related disciplines that have UNESCO codes (e.g., anthropology, history of medicine, zoology, entomology) and terms louse (lice), jaundice, folk medicine, folklore, digestology, ethnozoology, zootherapy and entomotherapy, in conjunction with the Spanish geographical scope. In turn, all related works systematically obtained were checked for recording data on the use of head lice as a remedy for jaundice.


A total of 33 studies were reviewed from the literature search. Table 1 provides a list of references consulted (arranged chronologically). The original descriptions of the remedies are included, and the geographical location of the use is indicated.

Table 1 List of Spanish traditional remedies for jaundice based on the ingestion of head lice


The therapeutic use of head lice against jaundice has remained in Spanish oral tradition and has survived until today, although its current use has not been documented in research within the last decade.

Method of preparation and dosage

In 9 studies (27%) the necessary intake of live lice is documented. It is a transference therapy based on the belief that these insects feed on bile, which is the materialization of the “disease” [18, 25, 50].

Many references indicate that lice should be administered to the patient on an empty stomach without his/her knowledge. They are usually dissolved or mixed in food that the patient has to take. A wide range of food is mentioned and chocolate is especially recommended.

With regard to the dosage, 16 studies (48%) indicate the number of lice to ingest. In most cases, odd numbers are mentioned; in nine the recommended number is 9. This is the same amount that appears most often as the recommended number of days for treatment duration (9 days). In Spanish popular culture, the odd are laden with symbolism and considered to be sacred in character, thus, they form part of healing rituals. The number 9 is considered as “the perfection” and a symbol of life [51].

Geographical distribution

As for the geographical distribution of the use of head lice as a remedy for jaundice, appointments found cover much of the northwestern quadrant of Spanish territory (Figure 1). Numerous localities in the Basque Country and Navarre are mentioned.

Figure 1
figure 1

Geographical distribution of the use of head lice as an anti-jaundice remedy in Spain. The cited provinces and autonomous communities are highlighted in gray; () mentioned localities; () “comarcas” (~ regions, shires).

Numerous authors show that using animal resources as therapy is a widely distributed atavistic practice [52, 53], a fact that is demonstrated by the use of head louse against jaundice in distant geographical areas [54, 55]. Its use is particularly common in the Hebrew culture. Izaak Walton in his famous book “The Compleat Angler” (published in 1653) records that the Jews were the first to say that swallowing live lice is a good remedy for jaundice [56]. For their part, the German rabbi Yair Bacharach (1639–1702), author of the collection of responsa known as “Havvot Yair” (“Villages of Yair”), indicates that the patient should take 8 lice taken from his/her own head–see Rosner and Bleich 2000 [57]. Ben-Ezra in 1949 recorded in Horodetz (one of the oldest Jewish communities in Russia-Poland) the introduction of lice in an omelette as treatment [58]. In Latin America there are also references to this medical practice. In this case, the remedy would have been brought by the Spanish conquistadors and assimilated by the Spanish American folk medicine in an eclectic form [9]. The recommended number of specimen to take in Chile, Peru, Guatemala and Argentina is 4 or 5 with examples found using measures such as a thimbleful [5962].


The key elements of Spanish folk medicine can be found in beliefs and empiricism [50, 63], thus the employed remedies and recipes have been developed primarily through magical conceptions using the homeopathic principle similia similibus curantur or following the natural-philosophical basis of the humoral theory [64]. Keep this in mind, and although the explanations and justifications for taking head lice as an anti-jaundice remedy are complex, it can be hypothesized following two arguments. First, an Aristotelian scheme of thought like Bartholomaeus Anglicus (born before 1203–died 1272) can be used as a starting point. Anglicus applied the humoral theory to the origin of human louse and proposed a hypothesis with a magical explanation of homeopathic type. In chapter LXXXII of his compendium De proprietatibus rerum (“On the Properties of Things”), this author wrote: “lice are begotten of rotten humours that are between the skin and flesh, and fall outside with the sweat”–see Seymur 1975–1988 [65]. Furthermore he classifies them, stating that “those who are begotten from the choleric humour are greenish-yellow”. Choleric humour is synonymous of yellow bile, hence following the principle similia similibus curantur these ectoparasitic insects can be considered a remedy for the treatment of jaundice. This type of reasoning, based on a magical explanation (without rational basis), has been important in therapy throughout history and was highly valued by Classical Greek philosophers such as Empedocles or Plato [66, 67]. Second, folk medicine users also create their own conceptions about health by developing theories with rational bases. For example, in the early 20th century in the Basque Country people still thought that a web in the liver or stomach prevented the normal circulation of bile making it necessary to drill or destroy it. For this reason, the basis of curative applications lies in the belief that the patient should ingest live lice to either break the web or eat it [34, 48]. In Navarre it was explained that when the lice reached the initial part of the intestine they would cause a reaction and help release retained bile [49]. These popular explanations coincide with the description given by Sterpellone [68], who presumed that: “… swallowed lice reaches the stomach and, as they are resistant to the action of gastric juices, pass through the pylorus and enter the duodenum, tickling the walls. This tickle causes contractions in the duodenal wall favouring bile flux and relieving bile stasis which causes jaundice when the bile ducts are blocked due to a mucous stopper.”

In Early Modern history lice intake was described as a “superstitious remedy”, i.e. as a misconception and not accepted by official medicine, which considered it an “illegitimate knowledge”. Despite all, this remedy, typical of oral tradition, has been passed on to us (see Table 1).

At present, folk medicine makes use of the Information and Communication Technology for the transmission and dissemination of knowledge. It is interesting to note that inquiries related to this folk remedy appeared on various websites relating to health and disease management (, in June 2008. The question posed by a user was as follows: “Can head lice given to a person reduce extreme jaundice? Is it true? Please, advise me.” As expert, G M (on June 12, 2008) responded: “I have never heard of any such treatment for jaundice involving head lice. Preferring ‘natural’ cures has its place, but everything that is natural is not necessarily good” (see The previous question and answer reflect popular conceptions about health and disease. Considering that this remedy has been part of our collective knowledge and cultural background, we can state that it is part of a deeply rooted “implicit theory”. Therefore, although the remedy is not currently used in Spain, it is necessary to consider how these ideas have influenced the behaviour of the patients, how they cope with the disease and how to address medical pluralism.

Moreover, this work lies within the context of ethnomedicine and insects, the latter being an animal group of great therapeutic potential. In recent years there have been regularly published reports addressing their importance in the search for new drugs [6971] and even the pharmacological properties of certain species [7274] or insect-derived products [75, 76] have been studied. Thus, the present document should serve as a basis and a valuable tool for future chemical screening and biological assays, and should open new perspectives for the economic and cultural assessment of animals traditionally thought of as being of no use.


The use of folk remedy for jaundice based on the ingestion of head lice is difficult to understand due to lack of information on sympathetic or antipathetic associations that were established in the past. However, the survival of this traditional knowledge in Spanish society and its relatively wide geographical distribution helps verify the consistency of the theories formulated within rural communities, even though they may conflict with biomedical health care. It also suggests the need of taking into account the beliefs, ideas and behaviour patterns of popular culture in relation to health and disease for a better understanding with the patient.


  1. 1.

    Costa-Neto EM: Entomotherapy, or the medicinal use of insects. J Ethnobiol. 2005, 25 (1): 93-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Costa-Neto EM, Ramos-Elorduy J, Pino JM: Los insectos medicinales de Brasil: primeros resultados. Boln SEA. 2006, 38: 395-414.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chakravorty J, Ghosh S, Meyer-Rochow VB: Practices of entomophagy and entomotherapy by members of the Nyishi and Galo tribes, two ethnic groups of the state of Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011, 7: 5-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Meyer-Rochow VB: Ethno-entomological observations from North Korea (officially known as the “Democratic People's Republic of Korea”). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013, 9: 7-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Arese P, Gallo V, Pantaleo A, Turrini F: Life and death of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient erythrocytes – role of redox stress and band 3 modifications. Transfus Med Hemother. 2012, 39: 328-334.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tan CB, Rashid S, Rajan D, Gebre W, Mustacchia P: Hepatic sarcoidosis presenting as portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis: case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2012, 6: 183-189.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang YX, Liu H: Adult hepatoblastoma: systemic review of the English literature. Dig Surg. 2012, 29: 323-330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Blánquez A: Aurelio Cornelio Celso. Los ocho libros de la Medicina. 1966, Iberia: Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Foster GM: Relationships between Spanish and Spanish-American folk medicine. J Am Folklore. 1953, 66 (261): 201-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Durden LA, Lloyd JE: Lice (Phthiraptera). Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Edited by: Mullen GR, Durden LA. 2009, Amsterdam: Academic Press, 59-82. 2

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bisby F, Roskov Y, Culham A, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Paglinawan L, Bailly N, Kirk P, Bourgoin T, Baillargeon G, Hernández F: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 18th April 2013. 2013,,

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lehane MJ: The Biology of blood-sucking in insects. 2005, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Meinking TL: Human lice. Encyclopedia of Entomology. Edited by: Capinera JL. 2008, Heidelberg: Springer, 1883-1886. 2

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kittler R, Kayser M, Stoneking M: Molecular evolution of Pediculus humanus and the origin of clothing. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 1414-1417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Leo NP, Campbell NJH, Yang X, Mumcuoglu K, Barker SC: Evidence from mitochondrial DNA that head lice and body lice of humans (Phthiraptera: Pediculidae) are conspecific. J Med Entomol. 2002, 39 (4): 662-666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li W, Ortiz G, Fournier PE, Giménez G, Reed DL, Pittendrigh B, Raoult D: Genotyping of human lice suggests multiple emergences of body lice from local head louse populations. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010, 4 (3): e641-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gárate J: Los estudios de medicina en el País Vasco. Rev Int Estud Vascos. 1929, 20 (3): 378-396.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donostia JA: Oraciones, prácticas religiosas y medicinas populares. CEEN. 1972, 10: 5-34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Morán Bardón C: Creencias sobre curaciones supersticiosas recogidas en la provincia de Salamanca. AMSEAEP. 1927, 6: 241-261.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Risco V, Rodríguez Martínez A: Folklore de Melide. Terra de Melide. Edited by: VV AA. 1933, Santiago de Compostela: Seminario de Estudos Galegos Nós, 456-457.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Iribarren JM: Batiburrillo navarro: segunda parte de Retablo de Curiosidades. 1943, Zaragoza: Imprenta Heraldo de Aragón

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Caro Baroja J: La vida rural en Vera de Bidasoa (Navarra). 1944, Madrid: Instituto Antonio de Nebrija–CSIC

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marcos De Sande M: Del folklore garrovillano. Rev Est Extremeños. 1947, 1–2: 77-114.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Díaz Mora R: La región natural de la Sierra de Gata, Iniciación al estudio de su folklore con especial mención de su medicina popular. PhD thesis. 1948, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lis Quibén V: La Medicina Popular en Galicia. 1949, Pontevedra: Gráficas Torres

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Arias MA: La leyenda de San Salvador de Cornellana. Bol Inst Estud Asturianos. 1955, 25: 269-282.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Duran Sotelo A: Algunos aspectos de la vida en Santa Justa (Moraña). Degree thesis. 1961, Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Taboada J: Folklore de Verín: las creencias y el saber popular. 1961, Orense: La Región, 2:

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fernández-Ruiz C: Historia médica del Principado de Asturias. 1965, Oviedo: Instituto de Estudios Asturianos

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Barandiarán JM: Obras completas. Gran Enciclopedia Vasca, vol. 6. 1974, Gobierno Vasco: Bilbao

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barriola IM: La medicina popular en el País Vasco. 1979, San Sebastián: Ediciones Vascas

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Becoña Iglesias E: La actual medicina popular gallega. 1981, La Coruña: Magoygo, 2

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Carril A: Veterinaria y medicina popular en Salamanca. Rev Folklore. 1981, 5: 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Goicoetxea Marcaida A: Capítulos de la Medicina Vasca. 1983, Salamanca: Instituto de Historia de la Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Blanco JF: Medicina y veterinaria populares en la provincia de Salamanca. 1985, Salamanca: Diputación de Salamanca, 2

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Junceda Avello E: Medicina popular en Asturias. 1987, Oviedo: Instituto de Estudios Asturianos

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Martí i, Pérez J: La medicina popular en Cataluña. Anthropologica. 1988, 3: 69-89.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vázquez Gallego X: Tradiciones, mitos, creencias y curanderismo en medicina popular de Galicia. 1989, Lugo: Diputación Provincial de Lugo

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Barandiarán JM: Recetas y remedios en la tradición popular vasca. 1990, San Sebastián: Txertoa

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mateos Romero T: Estudio antropológico-médico de Torremenga (Cáceres). 1990, Cáceres: Institución Cultural “El Brocense”–Diputación de Cáceres

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rúa Aller FJ, Rubio Gago ME: La medicina popular en León. 1990, León: Ediciones Leonesas

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Carril A: Etnomedicina. Acercamiento a la terapéutica popular. 1991, Castilla Ediciones: Valladolid

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Guío Cerezo Y: Naturaleza y Salud en Extremadura: los remedios. 1992, Mérida: Asamblea de Extremadura

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Salud, enfermedad y terapéutica popular en la Ribera Alta. Edited by: Fresquet JL. 1995, Valencia: Instituto de Estudios Documentales e Históricos sobre la Ciencia, Universitat de València–CSIC

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pámpano M, Redondo F: Remedios caseros para dolencias. San Vicente de Alcántara. 1997, Coordinated by Briegas Caro JM. San Vicente de Alcántara (Badajoz): Círculo Recreativo, 99-122.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Erkoreka A: Análisis de la medicina popular vasca. 2002, Barcelona: Bibliotex

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Álvarez Peña A: Magic-traditional medicine in Asturias (in Asturian language). 2004, Gijón (Asturias): VTP Editorial

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Medicina popular en Vasconia. Edited by: Barandiarán JM, Manterola A. 2004, Bilbao: Instituto Labayru

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Álvarez Caperochipi J: Curanderismo y medicina popular en el entorno de Navarra. 2012, Pamplona: Evidencia Médica

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kuschick I: Medicina popular en España. 1995, Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gavilanes E: El número nueve en la medicina popular. RDTP. 1995, 50 (1): 243-261.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lev E: Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levatine practice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 86: 107-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines?. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005, 1: 5-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Radford E, Radford MA: Edited and revised by Christina Hole. Encyclopedia of Superstitions. 1961, London: Hutchinson

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Martin EB: They’re killing off the rhino. Natl Geogr. 1984, 165 (3): 404-422.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Walton I: El perfecto pescador de caña. 1955, Barcelona: Gráficas Marsá

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Rosner F, Bleich JD: Jewish Bioethics. 2000, Hoboken NJ: KTAV Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ben-Ezra A: Horodetz: history of a town, 1142–1942. 1949, New York: “Horodetz” Book Committee

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Vicuña Cifuentes J: Mitos y supersticiones. 1945, Santiago de Chile: Nascimento

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Villatoro E, Reyes O: Guatemala: Mesoamérica y occidente, 500 años de simbolismos y prácticas médicas. Tradic Guatem. 1992, 37–38: 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Alarco De Zadra A: Nuestra fauna: comentarios, acerca de 521 ejemplares. 1997, Lima: Sociedad Geográfica de Lima

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Nario H: Los Picapedreros. 1997, Tandil: Ediciones del Manantial

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mariño Ferro XR: Los dos sistemas de la medicina tradicional y sus claves. Creer y curar: La medicina popular. Edited by: González Alcantud JA, Rodríguez Becerra S. 1996, Granada: Diputación Provincial de Granada, 421-456.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Leonti M: The future is written: Impact of scripts on the cognition, selection, knowledge and transmission of medicinal plant use and its implications for ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 134: 542-555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    On the Properties of Things. John Trevisa’s translation of Bartholomaeus Anglicus, De proprietatibus rerum: A critical text (3 vols.). Edited by: Seymur MC. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975–1988

  66. 66.

    Cohen M: Poder Curar. 2004, Buenos Aires: Del Signo

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Laín Entralgo P: La curación por la palabra en la Antigüedad clásica. 2005, Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sterpellone L: Historias curiosas de la Medicina. 2009, Barcelona: Robinbook

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Cherniack EM: Bugs and drugs: part 1: Insects. The “new” alternative medicine for the 21st century. Altern Med Rev. 2010, 15 (2): 124-135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Dossey AT: Insects and their chemical weaponry: New potential for drug discovery. Nat Prod Rep. 2010, 27: 1737-1757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ratcliffe NA, Mello CB, García ES, Butt TM, Azambuja P: Insect natural products and processes: New treatments for human disease. Insect Biochem Molec Biol. 2011, 41 (10): 747-769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Huberman L, Gollop N, Mumcuoglu KY, Block C, Galun R: Antibacterial properties of whole body extracts and haemolymph of Lucilia sericata maggots. J Wound Care. 2007, 16 (3): 123-127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Coutinho HDM, Vasconcellos A, Lima MA, Almeida-Filho GG, Alves RRN: Termite usage associated with antibiotic therapy: enhancement of aminoglycoside antibiotic activity by natural products of Nasutitermes corniger (Motschulsky 1855). BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009, 9: 35-

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Gunbilig D, Boland W: Defensive agents of Blaps femoralis, a traditional Mongolian medicinal insect. Sci Pharm. 2009, 77: 597-604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Son DJ, Lee JW, Lee YH, Song HS, Lee CK, Hong JT: Therapeutic application of anti-arthritis, pain-releasing, and anti-cancer effects of bee venom and its constituent compounds. Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 115 (2): 246-270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez JA: Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. J Food Sci. 2008, 73 (9): 117-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Anne Sherman for her English technical support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Ramón Vallejo.

Additional information

Competing interests

Both authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The two authors contributed equally during the data collection, data analysis and preparation of the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vallejo, J.R., González, J.A. The use of the head louse as a remedy for jaundice in Spanish folk medicine: an overview. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 9, 52 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Head louse
  • Jaundice
  • Ingestion
  • Traditional medicine
  • Spain