Open Access

Indigenous knowledge and use of lichens by the lichenophilic communities of the Nepal Himalaya

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine201713:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0142-2

Received: 22 November 2016

Accepted: 23 January 2017

Published: 21 February 2017

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to document the prevailing indigenous knowledge and various uses of lichens among the lichenophilic communities in the hills and mountainous settlements of Nepal.

Methods

Ethnic uses were recorded during twelve field trips, each of roughly 15 days in three consecutive years, through direct questionnaires administered to 190 respondents. Lichen samples were identified applying microscopic observation and thin layer chromatography (TLC). Voucher specimens of identified species are deposited at TUCH (Tribhuvan University Central Herbarium) in Nepal.

Results

Lichens are being used in several ways by different communities of Nepal. We recorded the ethnic use of seven species of lichens belonging to four families (Parmeliaceae, Physciaceae, Ramalinaceae and Usneaceae) and six genera (Heterodermia, Everniastrum, Parmotrema, Ramalina, Thamnolia and Usnea) among the Limbu, Sherpa, Lama, Gurung, Rai, Dalit, Tamang, Chhetri and Brahman communities. The present study revealed six use values namely; Medicinal value (MV), food value (FV), ritual and spiritual value (RSV), aesthetic and decorative value (ADV), bedding value (BV) and ethno-veterinary value (EVV) from different parts of Nepal. Three lichen species, Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense and Parmotrema cetratum were consumed by the Limbu and Rai communities. The Limbu and Sherpa ethnic groups are regarded as most lichenophilic communities while respondents from Brahman, Chhetri and Tamang communities showed less interest in lichen uses.

Conclusions

The present study contributes to document traditional knowledge on various uses of lichens among nine communities with three different cultural background, inhabitants of eight different altitudinal levels of Nepal. Regarding the six values as identified from this research, significant difference (p = <0.05) were found along altitudinal gradients or locations of the settlements, cultural groups and ethnicity of the respondents.

Keywords

Ethnolichenology Use values Limbu and Sherpa ethnic groups Ethnoveterinary

Background

Indigenous knowledge is the local knowledge inherited by indigenous and local communities that is unique to a culture or society. The scientific exploration and documentation of indigenous knowledge on wild resources are important tools to understand traditional living and food systems of local inhabitants [1]. It is estimated that globally, around one billion people consume wild foods in their diet [2] among them wild plants play a crucial role in the subsistence strategy of rural communities in developing countries [3]. Lichens are being used in traditional foods and medicines since millenia and also play vital roles in ecosystem function and human welfare [4]. During the mid eighteenth century, regular crops were badly affected in Europe by frosts and droughts causing famine, and as a consequence, lichens were used for food because of their easy availability, cheapness and nutritive value [5]. Most of the lichens are non-poisonous although some exceptions exist. Letharia vulpina, Cetraria pinastri, Bryoria fremontii and B. tortuosa are well known poisonous lichens contain vulpinic acid or pinastrinic acid [6, 7].

Nepal, though a small landlocked country with an area of 147,181 sq. km possesses a diverse socio-cultural heritage with 125 ethnic groups living in five physiographic regions starting from 60 m to 8,848 m from above sea level [8]. The topographic, climatic and ecological diversity makes this area a habitat where Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) are of great importance to local ethnic groups, contributing towards food security, local economy, traditional health care practices, and cultural values [9]. Forests provide on-site ecological benefits and/or services to the local communities and each community utilizes those services in different ways and practices [10].

Several publications have documented the inventory and ethnic uses of higher plants from different regions and among various tribes of Nepal [11, 12]. In contrast, the lichen flora and traditional utilization patterns and market potentiality of lichens has hardly been explored. A total of 792 species belonging to 187 genera of lichen-forming fungi have been reported from Nepal [13] but many lichen species have yet to be discovered [14]. While documenting indigenous knowledge on uses of higher plants, respondents also mentioned lichens, but lichens were not identified to the species level [1518]. Uses of lichens particularly among the Limbu, Rai and Sherpa ethnic groups, inhabitants of Eastern part of Nepal has been highlighted in a few studies [1922]. Here, we document indigenous knowledge on the values of lichens for various uses in different communities from three mountainous districts of Nepal.

Methods

Study site

The present study was conducted in three districts (Taplejung, Solukhumbu, and Gorkha) from two different regions (Eastern and Western) of Nepal (Fig. 1). The authors (SD, RPC) have accumulated sound knowledge on ethnic values of wild resources during their frequent visits to several mountainous Districts of Nepal prior to this research. Prior information played instrumental roles in selecting research areas. Eight field surveys mainly during summer season, roughly 15 days in duration, in the 22 different village development committees (VDCs) were carried out during 2011–2013 to collect ethnolichenological data. The following areas were selected to document ethnic uses of lichens: Olangchung Gola and Ghunsa Valleys located in Kangchenjunga Conservation Area of Taplejung District (N27°37′32.6958″, E87°46′34.7982″); Dudhkoshi and Dudhkunda Valleys located in Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) and surroundings of Solukhumbu District (N27°47′27.5028″, E86°39′39.9882″) in Northerneastern Nepal. Limbu, Rai, and Sherpa are main dwellers in these areas and for these communities, lichens play an important economic and cultural role. In Taplejung District, Phungling, Hangdeva, Phurumbu, Linkhim, Tapethok, Lelep, and Olangchung Gola, Village Development Committees (VDCs) were visited. In Solukhumbu, the settlements of Salleri, Beni, Taksindu, Jubing, Chaurikharka, Namche, and Khumjung VDCs were visited.
Fig. 1

The map of Nepal showing three studied districts

The Nubri and Tsum Valleys of Gorkha District (N28°28′35.0178″, E84°41′23.1″) located in Manaslu Conservation Area from Western part were selected as transition zone between Eastern and Western Himalayas. Scientifically, this area is poorly explored and less is known about biodiversity or social and cultural aspects from this valley because of its remoteness. In Gorkha, the VDCs of Lapu, Uiya, Sirdibas, Bihi, Prok, Samagaun, Chumchet, and Chekampar were visited. Gurung, Chhetri, and Sherpa are the main indigenous dwellers in this area.

Field survey and data collection

Random and snowball sampling methods were employed to collect primary data [23, 24]. Respondents, who either collected, bought or at least used lichens even for a single purpose were selected for face-to-face interview using semi-structured questionnaires (Table 1). In some additional cases, though, respondents were not aware of any uses of lichens; their name, ethnic group, age, religion were asked for the further analysis to know the demographic nature of such respondents. Respondents were not forced to give their real names, answers to all the questions from a list and were not asked as in question order. Prior informed consent [25] was taken verbally from key informants including local healers before documenting their traditional knowledge on various uses of lichens. Group discussions, informal meetings while staying with local communities and field observations with key-informants were carried out. Species recommended during participatory field observations were collected. For each species they identified, informants were asked to give details of their knowledge on uses and spiritual/ritual values and these were cross-checked at least with three respondents for their validity.
Table 1

Questionnaire used for the collectors

1

From where do you collect Jhyauu?

2

During which months do you collect these Jhyauu?

3

Which family members are involved in collection of Jhyauu?

4

What type of forest you prefer to go for the collection?

5

What amount do you normally collect in a day?

6

How do you collect, dry and store?

7

What are the collecting tools?

8

What are the uses of Jhyauu? Medicine (veterinary/human health or others)

9

How do you prepare medicine and use them?

10

What are additional uses? Others – poisonous, edible, rituals, incense, etc. (in details)

11

How can we minimize the poisonous nature of Jhyauu so that they can be suitable to eat? (If poisonous and used as medicine)

12

Is the available amount of Jhyauu sufficient for your local demand?

13

Has the need of Jhyauu increased over the past couple of years?

14

Is the amount of easy accessible Jhayuu stable over the years?

15

If not, can you compensate the decline of Jhayuu by accessing more remote areas?

16

Does quality of Jhyauu matter?, which are the quality criteria other than species?

17

Are these Jhyauu occurring widely in your area? Specification: Rare/common/abundant

18

Have you marked any type of Jhyauu eaten by animals or used by animals and birds for their nest?

19

Do you know about rule and regulation of Jhyauu?

20

Others, if any?

Frequently seen and field-identified species were listed and unidentified species were brought to the laboratory of Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal for the identification. In Nubri and Tsum Valleys, the interviews with older people from the Sherpa ethnic group were carried out in Bhotia dialect with the help of a local translator. In Chekampar, Nile and Chuley settlements of Tsum Valley and Olangchung Gola settlement in Taplejung, the semi-structured interviews were carried out for about 15 min in the evenings when the locals had finished their daily work. Phungling, a district headquarters and also the gateway of district is the main commercial hub of Taplejung. Lichen specimens being sold in weekly markets were collected for identification.

To calculate the statistical significance of differences between uses and variables characterizing the local population (location, age group, sex, caste and ethnicity), Pearson’s Chi-squared test (χ 2) was applied [26] using the statistical software R [27].

Lichen identification

The lichen specimens were identified by studying morphology, anatomy and lichen substances. Specimens were brought to the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Switzerland where chemical substances were identified with standard thin-layer chromatography (TLC) techniques [28, 29]. Identified specimens were stored in the Tribhuvan University Central Herbarium (TUCH), Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Results

Demographic characteristics of the informants

A total of 190 informants (87 male and 103 female) representing seven age groups (<12, 13–24, 25–35, 36–47, 48–59, 60–71, >72 years), nine communities (Brahman, Chhetri, Dalit, Gurung, Lama, Limbu, Rai, Sherpa and Tamang), and three cultural backgrounds (Buddhism, Hindu, Kiraat) from eight altitudinal levels (≤1000 m, 1000–1400 m, 1400–1800 m, 1800–2200 m, 2200–2600 m, 2600–3000 m, 3000–3400 m and ≥3400 m) were approached (Additional file 1). Of the total 190 informants, 82% (N = 156) know at least a single use of lichens or have heard about their uses. These 156 respondents were interviewed in detail using the semi-structured questionnaires.

Vernacular names

Highly used vernacular names for lichens are ‘Jhyauu’ or (translation: unnecessary stuff) and ‘Jhulo’ (translation: brittle things for the ignition) and even between the two, the most generalized name is Jhyauu. In addition, we documented 16 vernacular names used by indigenous peoples and ethnic groups in different parts of Nepal (Table 2). The vernacular names are derived mostly from gross morphology, life forms and palatability. Limbu and Rai called lichens as Yangben. Two different names ‘Maangmaa’ and ‘Myann’ among Sherpa ethnic group referred to edible and inedible lichens, respectively. Interestingly, it was found that people considered Thamnolia vermicularis, locally called Dankini Chyau (Witch mushrooms) as a mushroom species. Not a single respondent considered it a lichen. It was a big surprise for them to learn their real nature.
Table 2

Vernacular names used by indigenous people of Nepal for lichen species

Vernacular name

Meaning

Thallus organization or species

Caste or language

Jhyauu

Unnecessary stuff

All

Nepali

Jhulo

Brittle things

Foliose

Nepali

Tarey

Look like stars

Crustose

Nepali

Dankini Chyauu

Witch mushroom

Thamnolia vermicularis

Nepali

Maangmaa

Edible stuff

All

Sherpa, Lama

Myann

Inedible stuff

All

Sherpa

Yangben

No specific meaning

All

Limbu, Rai

Lunhokva

No specific meaning

All

Bantawa Raia

Atrong Carpob

Hay/Thread like

Thamnolia vermicularis

Himali Bhotia

Shingdrakb

On tree trunk

Fruticose, Foliose

Himali Bhotia

Chodrakb

On marshy habitat

Fruticose

Himali Bhotia

Dhodrakb

On rock

Crustose

Himali Bhotia

Shingbal, Ser Kue, Thangbu, Balteb

 

Usnea longissima

Bhotia/Kham

Budhnaac

 

All

-

aBantawa Rai is an ethnic group within Rai community [77]

bAdditional names reported by Lama et al. [15]

cName mentioned in Forest Regulations, 1995 [31]

Collection methods

Collection was started after the end of monsoon period, i.e., August - November. People from the eastern parts of Nepal were familiar with the uses of lichens since long ago, though this use has not been documented scientifically. Personal communication with a key informant (Mr. Bharat Limbu, age 61), from Tapethok Village, Taplejung recalled his early days and mentioned that his grandfather was also collecting Yangben for food. The collection of lichens was found to be crucial in the lower belt of Taplejung, where most of the households collect lichens which form important parts of their diet during Dashain, Tihar and Maghey Sankrati festivals. Collectors collect in nearby forests after lunch (around 9 AM) and spend around 6–8 h for the collection. Usually at least two people often of the same family, or close neighbors work together for the collection. Children and adults, both males and females, participate in the collection. Even students collect lichens while returning home after their school as they pass through forests or pastures. In our sites, mostly they used hand and sometimes stick to pick up lichens from the substratum. Lichens are collected in a sack or plastic bag. Once returned home, they removed unwanted lichens, and litter.

Uses of lichens

Our study revealed six uses of lichens in the study areas. Medicinal value (MV), ritual and spiritual value (RSV), food value (FV), aesthetic and decorative value (ADV), bedding value (BV) and ethno-veterinary value (EVV) are the major uses of lichens. Among the 156 respondents, use percentages were high (51%) for medicinal values (MV) and low for ethno-veterinary value (2%). Ritual and spiritual values (RSV) and food value (FV) were represented with 41% and 31%, respectively. For aesthetic and decorative values (ADV) and bedding values (BV), use percentage was 13% (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Percentage distribution of lichen uses among the respondents

Seven lichen species are particularly important among the respondents for various uses. Among these, use percentage was highest for Heterodermia diademata (49%) and lowest for Ramalina sp. (3%). Use percentage of Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense, and Usnea longissima were 40%, 38%, and 30%, respectively. For Parmotrema cetratum and Thamnolia vermicularis, use percentages were 31% (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Use percentage of important lichens species among the respondents

Respondents from nine communities used seven lichen species to meet their demands regarding the six lichen uses (Table 3). Among those, Heterodermia diademata and Ramalina species were used for medicinal values, Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense, and Parmotrema cetratum for food value, Usnea longissima for the ritual, spiritual, aesthetic values and as bedding materials, and Thamnolia vermicularis for the aesthetic and spiritual values. Interestingly, H. diademata was used by all ethnic communities.
Table 3

Lichen species used by nine ethnic communities for different use values

Species

Brahman

Chhetri

Dalit

Gurung

Lama

Limbu

Rai

Sherpa

Tamang

Use Values

Heterodermia diademata

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

MV

Everniastrum cirrhatum

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

FV

E. nepalense

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

FV

Parmotrema cetratum

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

FV

Ramalina sp.

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

MV

Thamnolia vermicularis

-

+

-

+

+

+

-

+

+

RSV

Usnea longissima

-

+

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

RSV, BV, ADV

MV medicinal value, FV food value, RSV ritual and spiritual value, BV bedding value, ADV aesthetic and decorative value

Lichens and ethno-medicines

Forty nine percent of respondents (N = 77) used Heterodermia diademata to treat wounds and to stop bleeding after an injury. Extracts or juices of Artemisia vulgaris or Eupatorium odoratum mixed with this lichen species are used to cure fresh wounds or cuts. Regarding the medicinal value (MV), a significant difference (p = <0.05) was observed with altitudinal gradients, cultural groups and ethnicity (Table 4). Two respondents (>72 years) from Hangdewa and two (60 and 71 years) respondents from Phurumbu, Taplejung District used Ramalina sp. as antiseptic tincture to heal wounds.
Table 4

Significant of difference among use values and respondents with different demographic characters

Lichen uses

 

Altitudinal levels

Religion

Ethnicity

 

df

7

2

8

Medicinal

χ 2 value

21.800

26.275

46.000

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Ritual and spiritual

χ 2 value

87.733337

47.5

113.4

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Food

χ 2 value

90.3333

63.378

214.875

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Aesthetic and decorative

χ 2 value

48.7143

21.7143

69.4286

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Bedding

χ 2 value

92.1429

12.95

35.1429

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Ethno-veterinary

χ 2 value

21

6.0

24.0

P-value

<0.05

<0.05

<0.05

Lichens in Nepalese cuisine

Regarding the food value (FV), a significant difference (p = <0.05), was observed according to altitudinal levels of the studied areas, religion and ethnicity (Table 4). Although lichens occur from outer Tarai to the high mountains, the use of lichens in cuisine is observed only among Limbu, Rai and partly with Sherpa and Tamang ethnic groups. These groups are major dwellers of Eastern midhills and mountainous regions of Nepal. Major dishes prepared with steamed lichens are pickle, curry, soup and sausages. Twenty six percent of the respondents prepared dishes of Everniastrum nepalense, E. cirrhatum and Parmotrema cetratum. Freshly harvested (Fig. 4) or purchased lichens (about 250 g) are boiled for about 1 h with ash (about 50 g), rinsed in clean cold water until any yellow color is gone, sun dried on bamboo woven baskets and placed in closed containers in a dry place. Boiled and dried lichens can be stored for a year. For bread making, boiled, dried and powdered lichens are mixed mainly with wheat or barely flour (1:3 mixed lichens and flour).
Fig. 4

Freshly collected Everniastrum nepalense

Limbu people prepare a special traditional dish called Sargyangma made of lichens to celebrate their special gatherings and social functions like Dashain, Tihar and in some cases, when a pig is slaughtered in the community (Fig. 5). Sargyangma is a kind of sausage made up of minced pork, pork’s blood, eggs, fat, rice grains (optional), spices, onion, garlic, chilly, turmeric powder, ginger, salts and lichens inserted in the pork’s big intestines. Filling of ingredients should not be compact. Boiled and dried lichens is ground fine and mixed with other ingredients. Sometimes, Sargyangma is specially prepared for old elderly people during the festivals who cannot eat meat because of their weaker teeth.
Fig. 5

Sausage prepared with a mixture of lichens and other ingredients in pork’s big intestine

Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense and Parmotrema cetratum were much preferred species and found to be sold in local weekly markets in the district headquarter of Taplejung. Our study found that since the last 5–7 years, the demand for edible lichens is rising, especially from abroad. Thousands of Rai and Limbu families from Eastern part of Nepal are living abroad (mainly in UK and Hongkong) and they want to taste lichen during their festivals. Lichens are also considered as the best gift item in such communities.

Ritual, spiritual and aesthetic values

Thamnolia vermicularis was used on the belief that this lichen wards off evil spirit and maintains peace at home and among family members. Respondents kept a handful of lichens above the main entrance of a house. Twenty two respondents (male 10, female 13) from six villages (Hangdewa 1, Lelep 1, Linkhim 2, Phurumbu 3, Tapethok 4 and Olangchung Gola 12) of Taplejung District used this lichen. Such practice was common among the Buddhist and Kirant cultural groups. Similarly, people of Olangchung Gola and Ghunsa used Usnea longissima to clean religious cups like butter lamps (Diyo in Nepali) and water bowls made of silver. With wet U. longissima, pots are scrubbed to remove stains.

Usnea longissima and Thamnolia vermicularis were used as ingredients in incense powder mainly by the Sherpa (N = 30) and Lama (N = 11) ethnic groups, residing in Olangchung Gola, Ghunsa and Tsum valleys. They mixed these dried lichens with dried leaves of Juniperus indica, J. squamata, Rhododendron anthopogon, R. decorum, R. lepidotum and roots of Jurinea dolomiaea. They burn incense powder during their morning pray and religious ceremonies which releases pleasant and fragrant smoke.

Usnea longissima, an abundant, long thread-like lichen, was used for decoration by 17 respondents. This was being practiced among the Sherpa community of Olangchung Gola settlement of Kangchenjunga Conservation Area. The lichen was collected fresh and either framed making different shapes (designs) or simply hangs around in a room. Similarly, 16 respondents of Olangchung Gola, two hoteliers from Khumjung and one hotelier at Namche, Solukhumbu District were using fallen branches of trees with different species of lichens for the decoration in a corner of reception desks.

Lichens and animal husbandry

One local healer and two respondents from Chekampar, Gorkha District, mentioned about the uses of lichens as an antiseptic and healing agents against external injuries in cattle. Heterodermia diademata is powdered and applied externally on fresh cuts and wounds. A local healer (Mr. Dorje Lundup Lama, age 68, personal communication) got this knowledge from his father and he believed this practice has been developed by observing practice of rubbing wounds on a stone by injured sheeps. Surprisingly, this information was not found in other research areas.

Usnea longissima is used as bedding materials for colt, chick, newly born goats and yak calves mainly by herders. Twenty-one respondents (male = 10, female = 11), from three Districts (Solukhumbu = 3, Gorkha = 6, Taplejung = 12), from three altitudinal levels (2600–3000 m = 2, 3000–3400 m = 17, ≥3400 = 2) collected about 200 kg (in average 9.5 kg per collector) of lichens in one season for this purpose. Interestingly, it was not used as bedding materials for human and rarely used as stuffing material for pillow, for reasons being unknown.

Among the six lichen uses which we identified in our research, food value (FV), medicinal value (MV), animal bedding value (BV) and ethno-veterinary value (EVV) include in provisioning services whereas ritual and spiritual values (RSV) and aesthetic and decorative values (ADV) relate with cultural services. From this study, it is found that the Kiraat religious group (Limbu and Rai) is using three lichen species (Everniastrum nepalense, E. cirrhatum, Parmotrema cetratum) mainly for their food value (FV) while the Buddhism religious group preferred lichens (Heterodermia diademata, Usnea longissima, and Thamnolia vermicularis) for medicinal (MV) and ritual and spiritual values (RSV). Only a low number of Hindu respondents (Brahman and Chhetri) were using lichens (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Respondents from three religious groups using a lichens species b for different use values

Discussion

Nepal is a multicultural country with 125 casts and ethnic groups and most of the caste/ethnic groups are spread throughout the 75 Districts of the Nepal [8]. They have their own ethnoecological knowledge and understanding regarding the surrounding environment and plant resources [30]. One plant may have several vernacular names. From this study, we have summarized 21 vernacular names which are used in different parts of Nepal. Among them, Maangmaa, Myann and Lunhokya from Dudhkunda valley, Sagarmatha are new additions. Lama et al. [15] reported seven vernacular names from Dolpa District, trans-Himalayan zone of Western Nepal in Himali Bhotia and Kham dialects (Table 2). Forest Regulations [31] has quoted lichens as Budhani and Jhyauu. So far, Budhani is not known as lichen by any ethnic names and in the literature published on lichens from Nepal [13, 3244]. All the respondents in the studied areas mentioned Jhyauu for lichens and they have heard this name from their ancestors. So, here, we recommend using only a term Jhyauu rather than Budhani in the future. In an earlier publication by [15], Thamnolia vermicularis was mentioned as Xylaria sp. fungus from Dolpa, Nepal. This must be corrected in future studies. During our study, it was found that the vernacular name Dankini Chyau is the local name for lichens, but in contrary here Chyau means mushroom. So, it must be spelled as Dankini Jhyauu.

We have found that the Limbu ethnic group from Taplejung District is fond of preparing lichen soup, pickles, and sausages of Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense, and Parmotrema cetratum. The traditional knowledge how Limbu people prepare sausages with pig intestine, lichens and pig blood is unique. There are a few more lichen species around the globe which are used to prepare soup. Some major reports are Cetraria islandica [5], Umbilicaria mammulata [45], U. muhlenbergii [46], Bryoria fremontii [47]. Cetraria islandica, sold as “Iceland Moss” in the Scandinavian countries, is reported to be first lichen food for human beings, where lichen was mixed with grain flour to prepare bread, porridge, salads and several other local foods [5].

Traditionally, lichens are used to prepare indigenous foods, medicine, beverages, dyes, spices, decorations, animal feed and perfumes among different cultures across the world [4, 5, 14, 4851]. In India, Everniastrum cirrhatum is used as holy material for sacrificial fire in ceremonies and also being used as spice and flavoring agent for vegetables and meats [52]. Similar use of lichens in India to prepare incense powder was also reported [53] without giving species and incense ingredients details.

Lethariella cashmeriana, L. sernanderi, L. sinensis, Thamnolia vermicularis, and T. subuliformis are used to prepare tea in the Yunnan Province of China [54], and Cladonia rangiferina in the Northern Hemisphere [55]. However, in the present study, we did not find such reports/publications from the field and published literature on Nepalese lichens. We have found substantial use of Heterodermia diademata in our research areas against cuts and wounds. This information is also matched by the information given by Saklani and Upreti [56] where they have mentioned about the uses of H. diademata in India among the Nepalese living in Gangtok (Sikkim) for cuts and to heal wounds. H. diademata together with Eupatorium odoratum for the treatment of fresh wound and cuts was reported among Limbu community of eastern Nepal [21]. In traditional herbal therapeutic practice in Far-western Nepal, lichen extract and decoction were applied to treat moles [17].

Thamnolia vermicularis is also used as antiseptic in Western Himalayas to kill buttermilk borne worms [57]. Uses of T. vermicularis among mountainous Sherpa community are more common than in the midhills communities. Usnea sp. are used as bedding materials and stuffing materials for the pillow and alternatively as mattresses at seasonal camps [58, 59], as we found in our sites.

There were no publications from Nepal reporting the uses of lichens with an ethno-veterinary purpose prior to this research, though there are few publications on uses of higher plants for the same purpose [6063]. The use of Usnea barbata for the treatment of mammary infection in cattle is also reported from Xhosa, South Africa [64].

It was estimated that about 7,800 to 9,200 t lichens are collected to manufacture perfume in Morocco, Yugoslavia and France [65]. The uses of lichens to make dyes dates back to more than 3,500 years [66]. Many lichen species such as Bryoria fremontii, Everniastrum cirrhatum, Letharia vulpina, Ochrolechia oregonensis, O. tartarea, Parmelia omphalodes, Parmotrema nilgherrensis, Rocella spp., and others have been used as natural dyes from different parts of the World [5, 48, 67, 68]. We didn’t find such ethno-lichenological knowledge in our research area, although local women from Olangchung Gola, Ghunsa, Dudhkunda, Khumbu, Samagaun and Tsum valleys were active on weaving carpets using mixture of natural and synthetic dyes for the coloring of sheep wool.

Anthropogenic factors such as the unsustainable harvest and mismanagement in collection procedure of lichens at a large scale mainly to cover trade demands may reduce and threaten genetic resources. First of all, underlying mechanisms and processes of the lichens’ occurrence and dynamics should be understood so that suitable conservation strategies designed and recommendations for sustainable harvest can be made [6971]. Epiphytic lichens play a crucial role in ecosystem functioning and structural complexity [72]. Environment Protection Act 1996 and Environment Protection Act Regulations 1997 have made Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) or Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) mandatory in collection of selected plant species including lichen species in Appendix 1a, Article 8 [73]. A thorough analysis shows that IEA and EIA guidelines to reduce degradation of the environment are not followed by a larger group of people in the country due to lack of implementation and monitoring [74]. High-elevation lichens are also facing a significant threat due to climate change [75]. For epiphytic species with a high commercial value and demand such as Everniastrum cirrhatum, E. nepalense and Parmotrema cetratum future studies could test if in-situ culture techniques could support the production of substantial volumes of biomass for commercial harvest under climate change scenarios. Further, regular monitoring and certification system or ‘ecolabelling’ may improve sustainable harvesting systems [76].

Conclusions

The present study reveals that lichens are of great interest as foods, traditional medicines or therapeutic values, aesthetic and spiritual values to the local inhabitants of different regions of Nepal. There is a long tradition of using lichens among the lichenophilic communities residing in the eastern mountainous parts of Nepal. Collection, consumption and marketing of lichens in sustainable ways would lead to long-term availability of these resources. Thus, it is recommended to carry out further research on abundance, stock estimation and collection impact on economically and socially important species.

Abbreviations

ADV: 

Aesthetic and decorative value

BV: 

Bedding value

CDB: 

Central Department of Botany

DNPWC: 

Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation

EIA: 

Environmental impact assessment

EVV: 

Ethno-veterinary value

FV: 

Food value

IEE: 

Initial environmental examination

KCAC: 

Kangchenjunga Conservation Area Committee

MV: 

Medicinal value

NTFPs: 

Non-timber forest products

RSV: 

Ritual and spiritual value

TLC: 

Thin layer chromatography

TUCH: 

Tribhuvan University Central Herbarium

VDCs: 

Village Development Committees

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University, Nepal and Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Switzerland for their supportive roles in taxonomic identification and administrative support. We are thankful to the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Government of Nepal and Kangchenjunga Conservation Area Committee (KCAC) for the permission to conduct research, and to the people of the studied areas for their cooperation and for sharing their traditional knowledge. Prof. Krishna Kumar Shrestha CDB is thankful for the fruitful discussions. We are also thankful to Sanjeev Kumar Rai, Jyoti Prasad Gajurel, Laxmi Sankhi, Til Bikram Chongbang and Hem Bahadur Katuwal for their support and to Kamal Maden for sharing his knowledge and providing a picture of sausage prepared with lichens.

Funding

This research was funded by The Swiss National Science Foundation, Switzerland (grant JRP IZ70Z0_131338/1) to C. Scheidegger.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and in Table 1 and Additional file 1.

Authors’ contributions

SD and CS carried out the field work. CS identified lichens. SD analyzed the data and prepared the draft manuscript. CS, SW and RPC supervised the research and critically reviewed manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL
(2)
Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University
(3)
Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology (RECAST), Tribhuvan University
(4)
Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Graz

References

  1. Bharucha Z, Pretty J. The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:2913–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Burlingame B. Wild nutrition. J Food Compos Anal. 2000;13:99–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zemede A, Mesfin T. Prospects for sustainable use and development of wild food plants in Ethiopia. Econ Bot. 2001;55:47–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford SD. Lichens used in traditional medicine. In: Rankovie B, editor. Lichen secondary metabolites. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 27–80.Google Scholar
  5. Llano GA. Economic uses of lichens. Econ Bot. 1948;2:15–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Santesson CG. Lichens. Ark för Bot. 1939;29(A):6.Google Scholar
  7. Spribille T, Tuovinen V, Resl P, Vanderpool D, Wolinski H, Aime MC, Schneider K, Stabentheiner E, Toome-heller M, Thor G, Mayrhofer H, Mccutcheon JP. Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens. Science. 2016;353(6298):488–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. CBS. Population Census 2010: National Report. Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics; 2010.Google Scholar
  9. FAO. Non-wood forest products for rural income and sustainable forestry. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1995.Google Scholar
  10. Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Bojö J, Sjaastad E, Kobugabe Berg G. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. For Policy Econ. 2007;9:869–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Manandhar NP. Plants and people of Nepal. Portland: Timber Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Baral SR, Kurmi PP: A Compendium of Medicinal Plants in Nepal. Mrs. Rachana Sharma, 281 Maiju Bahal, Chabahil, Kathmandu −7, Nepal; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Olley L, Sharma LR. A provisional checklist of the lichens of Nepal. Bull Dep Plant Resour. 2013;35:18–21.Google Scholar
  14. Søchting U. Lichens. In: Mihe G, Pendry CA, Chaudhary R, editors. Nepal: An introduction to the natural history, ecology and human environment of the Himalayas. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: Edinburgh; 2015. p. 191–9.Google Scholar
  15. Lama YC, Ghimire SK, Aumeeruddy-thomas Y. Medicinal plants of Dolpo: Amchis’ knowledge and conservation. Kathmandu: WWF Nepal Program; 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Kunwar RM, Nepal BK, Kshhetri HB, Rai SK, Bussmann RW. Ethnomedicine in Himalaya: a case study from Dolpa, Humla, Jumla and Mustang districts of Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kunwar RM, Shrestha KP, Bussmann RW. Traditional herbal medicine in Far-west Nepal: a pharmacological appraisal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Humagain K, Shrestha KK. Medicinal plants in Rasuwa district, central Nepal: trade and livelihood. Bot Orient J Plant Sci. 2010;6:39–46.Google Scholar
  19. Sacherer J. The high altitude ethnobotany of Rolwaling Sherpas. CNAS J. 1979;VI:45–64.Google Scholar
  20. Bhattarai TB, Subba D, Subba R. “Yangben” The edible lichens of east Nepal and their food value. J Nat Hist Mus. 2000;19:161–8.Google Scholar
  21. Limbu DK, Rai BK. Ethno-medicinal practices among the Limbu community in Limbhuwan, Eastern Nepal. Glob J Hum Soc Sci H. 2012;XIII(II):7–29.Google Scholar
  22. Limbu RK. Exploring indigenous knowledge system and Limbu cultural identity in Nepal. J Univ Grants Comm. 2013;2:122–37.Google Scholar
  23. Alexiades MN. Collecting ethnobotanical data: an introduction to basic concepts and techniques. In: Alexiades MN, editor. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research. New York: New York Botanical Garden; 1996. p. 53–94.Google Scholar
  24. Espinosa MM, Bieski IGC, de Oliveira Martins DT. Probability sampling design in ethnobotanical surveys of medicinal plants. Brazilian J Pharmacogn. 2012;22:1362–7.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenthal JP. Politics, culture and governance in the development of proior informed consent in indigenous communities. Curr Anthropol. 2006;47:119–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Bradai L, Neffar S, Amrani K, Bissati S, Chenchouni H. Ethnomycological survey of traditional usage and indigenous knowledge on desert truffles among the native Sahara Desert people of Algeria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;162:31–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Culberson CF, Kristinsson H. A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. J Chromatogr. 1970;46:85–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Culberson CF. Improved conditions for the identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chromotagraphic method. J Chromatogr. 1972;72:113–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rokaya MB, Shrestha MR, Ghimire SK. Ethnoecology of natural environment in trans-himalayan region of west Nepal. Banko Janakari. 2005;15:13–8.Google Scholar
  31. GoN/MoFSC: Forest Act, 1993 and Forest Regulation, 1995. Ministry of forest and soil conservation. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 1995.Google Scholar
  32. Paulson R. Lichen of mount everest. London J Bot. 1925;63:189–93.Google Scholar
  33. Asahina Y. Lichens. In: Kihara H, editor. Fauna and flora of Nepal Himalaya. Scientific results of the Japanese expeditions to Nepal Himalaya (1952–53). Kyoto: Fauna and Flora Research Society, Kyoto University; 1955. p. 44–63.Google Scholar
  34. Awasthi DD. A key to the microlichens of India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Bibl Lichenol. 1991;40:1–337.Google Scholar
  35. Awasthi DD. A Compendium of the Macrolichens from India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. India: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh; 2007.Google Scholar
  36. Sharma LR. Enumeration of the Lichens of Nepal. Biodiversity Profiles Project Technical Publications No. 3. His Majesty’s Government of Nepal: Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation; 1995.Google Scholar
  37. Kumar SK, Banskota AH, Manandhar MD. Isolation and identification of some chemical constituents of Parmelia nepalensis. Planta Med. 1996;62:93–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Maraseni TN, Shivakoti GP. Policy needs in harvesting and marketing of non-timber forest products in Nepal. In: Hiremath AJ, Gladwi C, Uma Shankar R, editors. Proceedings of the South Asian Regional workshop on Policies, Utilization and Conservation of Non Timber Forest Products in South Asia Region, 28–30 April 2003, Bangalore, India. 2003. p. 241–52.Google Scholar
  39. Maraseni TN, Shivakoti GP, Cockfield G, Apan A. Nepalese non-timber forest products: an analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-scale For Econ Manag Policy. 2006;5:191–206.Google Scholar
  40. Devkota A. Taxonomic study of lichens of Phulchowki hills, Lalitpur district (Kathmandu valley). Sci World. 2008;6:44–51.Google Scholar
  41. Baniya CB, Solhøy T, Gauslaa Y, Palmer MW. The elevation gradient of lichen species richness in Nepal. Lichenol. 2010;42:83–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Nag P, Rai H, Upreti DK, Nayaka S, Gupta RK. Epiphytic lichens as indicator of land-use pattern and forest harvesting in a community forest in west Nepal. Bot Orient J Plant Sci. 2011;8:24–32.Google Scholar
  43. McCune B, Divakar PK, Upreti DK. Hypogymnia in the Himalayas of India and Nepal. Lichenol. 2012;44:595–609.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Devkota S, Cornejo C, Werth S, Chaudhary RP, Scheidegger C. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the Himalayan lichen fungus Lobaria pindarensis (Lobariaceae). Appl Plant Sci. 2014;2.Google Scholar
  45. Leighton AL. Wild plant use by the woods cree (Nihithawak) of east-central Saskatchewan. Ottawa: National Museum of Man Mercury Series 101; 1985.Google Scholar
  46. Rebesca M, Romie D, Johnson M, Ryan J. Dene medicine Part I: report. Lac La Martre, NWT, Canada: Dene Cultural Institute; 1994.Google Scholar
  47. Turner NJ. Economic importance of black tree lichen (Bryoria fremontii) to the Indians of Western North America. Econ Bot. 1977;31:461–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson DHS. Medicinal and other economic aspects of lichens. In: Handbook of lichenology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc; 1988.Google Scholar
  49. Brodo I, Sharnoff S, Sharnoff S. Lichens of North America. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  50. Nayaka S, Upreti DK, Khare R. Medicinal lichens of india. In: Trivedi PC, editor. Drugs from plants. Jaipur: Avishkar Publishers, Distributors; 2010.Google Scholar
  51. Upreti DK, Bajpai R, Nayaka S, Singh BN. Ethnolichenological studies in India: future prospects. In: Jain AK, editor. Indian ethnobotany: emerging trends. India: Scientific Publishers; 2015. p. 195–231.Google Scholar
  52. Upreti DK, Divakar PK, Nayaka S. Commercial and ethnic use of lichens in India. Econ Bot. 2005;59:269–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Shah NC. Lichens of commercial importance in India. Scitech J. 2014;01:32–6.Google Scholar
  54. Wang L-S, Narui T, Harada H, Culberson CF, Culberson WL. Ethnic uses of lichens in Yunnan, China. Bryologist. 2001;104:345–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Llano GA. Lichens, their biological and economic significance. Bot Rev. 1944;X:1–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Saklani A, Upreti DK. Folk uses of some lichens in Sikkim. J Ethnopharmacol. 1992;37:229–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Upreti DK, Negi HR. Folk use of Thamnolia vermicularis (Swartz) Ach. in Lata Village of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. Ethnobotany. 1996;8:83–6.Google Scholar
  58. Lal B, Upreti DK. Ethnobotanical notes on three Indian lichens. Lichenol. 1995;27:77–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Moerman DE. Native American Ethnobotany. 1998.Google Scholar
  60. Acharya KP, Acharya M. Traditional knowledge on medicinal plants used for the treatment of livestock diseases in Sardikhola VDC, Kaski, Nepal. J Med Plants Res. 2010;4:235–9.Google Scholar
  61. Rokaya MB, Münzbergová Z, Timsina B. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants from the Humla district of western Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;130:485–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Poudel RC, Gao LM, Möller M, Baral SR, Uprety Y, Liu J, Li DZ. Yews (Taxus) along the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region: Exploring the ethnopharmacological relevance among communities of Mongol and Caucasian origins. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;147:190–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Luitel DR, Rokaya MB, Timsina B, Münzbergová Z. Medicinal plants used by the Tamang community in the Makawanpur district of central Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Afolayan AJ, Grierson DS, Kambizi L, Madamombe-Manduna I, Masika PJ. In vitro antifungal activity of some South African medicinal plants. South African J Bot. 2002;68:72–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Moxam TH. The commercial exploitation of lichens for the perfume industry. In: Brunke EJ, editor. Progress in essential oil research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 1986. p. 491–503.Google Scholar
  66. Casselman KL. Lichen dyes : ethical aspects relevant to Northeastern taxa. Maine Nat. 1994;2:61–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Agelet A, Valle J. Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region of Pallars (Pyrenees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Part II.Medicinal uses of non-vascular plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;84:229–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shukla P, Upreti DK, Nayaka S, Tiwari P. Natural dyes from Himalayan lichens. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2014;13:195–201.Google Scholar
  69. Rubio-Salcedo M, Merinero S, Martínez I. Tree species and microhabitat influence the population structure of the epiphytic lichen Lobaria pulmonaria. Fungal Ecol. 2015;18:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Merinero S, Martínez I, Rubio-Salcedo M, Gauslaa Y. Epiphytic lichen growth in mediterranean forests: effects of proximity to the ground and reproductive stage. Basic Appl Ecol. 2015;16:220–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Esseen P-A, Renhorn K-E. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests : effect of branch quality. Ecol Appl. 1996;6:228–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ellis CJ. Lichen epiphyte diversity: a species, community and trait-based review. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;14:131–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. MFSC/NCSIP. EIA Guidelines for the Forestry Sector. Kathmandu: Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation and National Conservation Strategy Implementation Project; 1995.Google Scholar
  74. Chaudhary RP. Forest conservation and environmental management in Nepal: a review. Biodivers Conserv. 2000;9:1235–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Allen JL, Lendemer JC. Climate change impacts on endemic, high-elevation lichens in a biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv. 2016.Google Scholar
  76. Downing B. Sustainable management and conservation of tropical rainforests in Asia: environment management component. In: Armitage I, editor. Proceedings of the Project Formulation Workshop on a Support Program for Sustainable Management, Conservation and Utilization of Tropical Rain Forests in Asia, 6–8 February 1995, Bangkok. Bangkok: FAO/RAPA; 1955.Google Scholar
  77. McDougal C. The Kulung Rai: a study in kinship and marriage exchange. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar; 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement