Skip to main content

Indigenous knowledge system associated with the uses of insects for therapeutic or medicinal purposes in two main provinces of Burkina Faso, West Africa



Some insects are harmful to humans, plants and animals, but some of them can also be a source of proteins, fats, vitamins and minerals and be of therapeutic value. The therapeutic potential requires that medicinal insects and their derived products need to be scrutinized. This study highlights the indigenous knowledge related to their use of medicinal insects in peri-urban and urban areas of Burkina Faso.


The survey was carried out among 60 traditional healers spread across two phytogeographical zones of Burkina Faso. The questionnaire focused on medicinal insects used by experienced traditional healers. Chi-square tests and principal component analysis were performed to test for significant differences regarding knowledge of how insects in phytogeographically different areas were used therapeutically in connection with different disease categories.


A total of 19 species of medicinal insects belonging to 6 orders were cited in connection with treatments of at least 78 pathologies and symptoms. Most frequently mentioned was gastroenteritis. Our study showed that 48.78% of the insects and their products were associated with 46 plant species for the treatment of pathologies. In addition, honey, beeswax and nests were the most widely insect products used.


The current study allows us to identify medicinal insects as well as their products used in the treatment of pathologies and symptoms, suggesting the presence of a considerable diversity of therapeutically important insect species. These insects are used alone and/or with their products but often in association with medicinal plants. The results constitute a useful database for future studies of medicinal insects in central and western parts of Burkina Faso.


In terms of species, insects are the most numerous groups of living organisms. Up to now, more than one million species of insects have been described, comprising about 70% of all organisms [1]. Insects can be found in almost all habitat on earth and they interact with all components (abiotic and biotic) of their environments. Many of them are known to be destructive and harmful, and around 228 million cases of malaria accounting for 405,000 deaths (including 93% in Africa alone) are linked to Anopheles mosquitoes, major vector to malaria transmission [2]. Sarcoptes scabiei, not an insect, an arachnid belonging to arthropod, responsible of scabies diseases, affects about 300 million cases yearly worldwide [3]. Severe yield losses of crops amounting to 100,852. 85 ha per annum have been recorded due to caterpillars of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda infestations during the 2017/2018 agricultural campaign in Burkina Faso [4]. Some species of insects have even been involved in the destruction of a country’s infrastructure [5]. This is the case of Coptotermes formosanus that is an opportunistic feeder of any material containing cellulose. It is known to damage non-cellulose materials in search of food, including plastic, concrete and soft metal [6]. However, these various negative effects insects should not hide the insects’ undeniably useful roles in the ecosystem. Indeed, they balance the ecosystem for the following reasons: they play an important role in (i) Pollination (80% of the world's flowering plant species depend on entomogamy) [7], (ii) Scavenging, recycling and fertilizing, (iii) Positive interactions with the soil [8], (iv) Biological control [9], (v) Entomophagy as food for humans and animals [10], (vi) Providing economic benefits (marketing of products like honey, wax, silk, lac) and (vii) The treatment of disorders and diseases [11, 12]. For a long time, immemorial humans have used insects and their products for the treatment of various pathologies [12, 13]. Medicinal insects and their products can be used to treat many different diseases either directly or indirectly. Thus, honey bees and their products like honey, propolis, royal jelly, their venom, etc. can be used to treat different health problems [14, 15]. Insect therapy can be an excellent avenue for drug research regarding the great diversity in this group [11,12,13, 16,17,18]. This requires a deep knowledge of the medicinal insects, their chemical composition and their potential applications. However, if in countries like China, Korea, India or Brazil, many documents provide information on medicinal insects [14, 16, 18,19,20,21,22], this is not the case for many African countries and even more Burkina Faso. The existing data remained very scarce [8, 23] and need to be deepened. Our objective aimed at assessing local knowledge on medicinal insects associated with their potential utilizations in five localities from Burkina Faso.


Study areas

This study was conducted from May to September 2020 in five localities across the Sudanian and Sudano-sahelian zones of Burkina Faso, located in the west part of the African continent. They are Bobo Dioulasso, Dafinso belonging to the province of Houët (9°–11°30′ N) and Ouagadougou, Saaba and Gonsé located in the province of Kadiogo (11°30′–14° N) (Fig. 1). The climate is tropical with two seasons: the dry (from October to April) and the rainy (from May to September) seasons in both study zones [24]. Mean annual rainfall ranged from 600 to 900 mm in the North Sudanian zone and 900 to 1000 mm in the South Sudanian zone (Fig. 1). The vegetation of the South Sudanian zone consists of a mosaic of savanna, dry forest and patches of gallery forests [25] and is characterized by Sudanian and Guinean species, whereas the North Sudanian zone is dominated by savanna with annual growing grass, trees, and shrubs [24, 25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study areas indicating southern and northern Sudanese zones in Burkina Faso

Data collection

Survey was carried out in traditional healers in the study area. In each province, 30 informants were interviewed through individual semi-structured interviews. Members of all ten ethnic groups were interviewed in both provinces. There were bissa, bobo, dafing, dioula, gourmantché, gourounsi, mossi, san, senoufo and turka without regarding their religious affiliation and their ages. Traditional healers were between 23 and 82 years old. A total of 60 traditional healers were interviewed in each site. The questionnaire included the photographs illustrating some medicinal insects and their products and also insects collection. During interviews or at a given period, insect specimens were collected and kept in bottles containing alcohol for identification according to Scholtz classification [26].

Statistical analysis

Data processing and analysis were performed with the XLSTAT-Premium software 2016. Chi-square analysis was used to determine whether there were statistically significant differences among two climatic zones in knowledge of medicinal insects. Statistical significance was tested at the 5% level. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to explore the variations in the medicinal insects use in different medical categories.


Local knowledge extent on medicinal insects

Medicinal insects used and frequency of citations

Nineteen (19) insect species belonging to six (6) orders that are Orthoptera, Blattodea known as hemimetabolous insects (exopterygota) and Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera known as holometabolous insects (endopterygota) were cited as medicinal insects in the two climatic zones (Fig. 2). The cited medicinal insects belonging to Orthoptera were crickets (Acheta domesticus) and locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) with 0.45% frequency of citation per insect. As for the Blattodea, we had Trinervitermes sp., Macrotermes sp. tree-nesting termites (Nasutitermes sp.) and the cockroach (Periplaneta americana) with 4.91%, 12.95%, 0.45% and 4.02% as frequency of citation, respectively. Hymenoptera was honey bees (Apis mellifera), mason wasp (Sceliphron sp.), common wasp (Vespula vulgaris), carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) hypoge nest ants (Pachycondyla sp.), ground-nest ants (Tetramorium sp) and sugar ants (Camponotus maculatus) with 45.54%, 9.38%, 1.34%, 0.89%, 4.46%, 6.70% and 0.44% as frequency of citation, respectively. In Coleoptera, a longhorned beetles (Cerambycidae), acantharids (Lytta sp.), dung beetles (Scarabaeus laticollis), 7-spotted ladybirds (Coccinella septempunctata) belonging to Coleoptera were cited with 0.89%, 0.89%, 0.45%, at 0.45% of frequency of citation, respectively. Lepidoptera is represented by the shea caterpillar butterfly (Cirina butyrospermi) with 4.46% of frequency of citation. The Diptera was represented by flies (Musca domestica) with 0.89% of frequency of citation. (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Citations by insects Orders in two climatic areas

Fig. 3
figure 3

The frequency of citations of medicinal insects in two climatic zones

Comparison of medicinal insects used in the two climatic zones

In both provinces, medicinal insects were used. However, the insects used to treat sick people are not always the same regardless climatic areas. Periplaneta americana) (A); Macrotermes sp. (B); Trinervitermes sp.; Apis mellifera (C), Vespula vulgaris; Sceliphron sp.; Pachycondyla sp. (D), Tetramorium sp.; Lytta sp. (E) and Cirina butyrospermi; were used in two climatic areas (Fig. 4). These medicinal insect’s species represented 52.63% of the cited species. However, five medicinal insects’ species were specific to the localities of the province of Houët. These are the cricket (Acheta domesticus), the carpenter ant (Camponotus spp.), the sugar ant (Camponotus maculatus) (F) (Fig. 4), the 7-spotted ladybird (Coccinella septempunctata), and the house fly (Musca domestica). As for the localities of the province of Kadiogo, the locust (Schistocerca gregaria), longhorn beetle (Cerambycidae), tree nest termites (Nasutitermes) and dung beetle (scarabaeus laticollis) were used specifically. However, the tests did not reveal a significant difference (Khi2 = 23.930, P = 0.2767) regarding the knowledge of medicinal insects in the two study areas. The difference in knowledge of traditional healers on medicinal insects is also not significant between sites in the Sudano-sahelian areas on the one hand and those in the Sudanian area on the other hand with respective Khi2 and p values of 13.407, 0.495 and 2.436, 0.494.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Some medicinal insects found in the two provinces: Kadiogo and Houët. A Periplaneta americana; B Macrotermes sp.; C Apis mellifera; D Pachycondyla sp.; E Lytta sp; F Camponotus maculatus

Stages of development and insect-derived products used

Different stages of development of medicinal insects used

Medicinal insects were used at different stages of their development. Among the insects cited in the climatic areas, 13 of them representing 68.42% of the above-mentioned species were used at different stages of development to produce drugs. Thus, Camponotus maculatus was used at both pupae and imago stage, Cirina butyrospermi and Musca domestica at the larvae stage and the other ones at the adult stage. However, we have not recorded any medicinal insects used in the egg stage (Table 1).

Table 1 Developmental stages of insects used in therapy

Products derived from insects used in therapy

A rate of 52.26%, i.e., 10 of the insects cited were qualified as medicinal, because their products had the therapeutic virtues (Table 2). Nests and honey were the products most involved in the treatment of pathologies by traditional healers in the climatic areas with a frequency of citations of 44.16 and 42.42%, respectively. The honey and the wax (Fig. 5C) used were those of the honey bee. The nests used by traditional healers were from various insects: wasps (Fig. 5D), termites (Fig. 5A and B) and ants. There were also materials transformed by insects such as wood gnawed by longhorned beetles (Fig. 5E), the dung ball rolled by the dung beetle and the food accumulated by the ants in their nests.

Table 2 Medicinal products from insects
Fig. 5
figure 5

Medicinal product from insects. A Trinervitermes sp. nest, B Macrotermes sp. nest, C Beeswax, D Sceliphron sp. nest, E Wood around the edge eaten away by a Cerambycidae

Medicinal insects and pathologies treated

Medicinal insects cited were involved in the treatment of 78 pathologies and symptoms. The various pathologies were grouped into 21 medical categories. Pathologies of gastroenterology and pulmonology were the most treated with medicinal insects in the two areas with the frequency of citations of 20.98% and 13.39%, respectively. While diseases of psychiatry, endocrinology and allergology with a frequency of citation of 0.4% per category were the less treated with insects and their products in these areas. One or more insects or products or the insect and its product may be used by a treatment of the given pathologies (Table 3). In 68.75% of cases, the pathology or symptom cited is treated by a single insect against 31.25% of cases where several insects were associated in the treatment of a given pathology. The diseases and symptoms treated by the same insects (Table 3) in these different localities were constipation, inflammation, difficulty in breathing, general fatigue, headache, cold, cough and vomiting.

Table 3 Insects and products use patterns in two provinces

Distribution of medicinal insects by medical category

The insects used in the different medical categories were subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA) (Fig. 6). The analysis revealed that the first two components explained 48.31% of the variability observed within the surveyed population. PCA showed medical categories treated by Cirina butyrospermi (Lepidoptera), opposite to Macrotermes sp., Trinervitermes sp., Periplaneta Americana (Blattodea), Apis mellifera Sceliphron sp, Pachycondyla sp. and Tetramorium sp. (Hymenoptera).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Distribution of medicinal insects according to the medical category in the PCA plan

Different associations between medicinal plants and insects in therapy

In 46.88% of cases, insects were associated with medicinal plants in the treatment of pathologies. Forty-six plant species associated with insects were reported in various treatments advised by traditional healers in the two provinces. The part of plants concerned were both grasses and woody plants. However, insects were not associated only with plants but also with either mineral substance including ash with 0.45% as frequency of citation or fat of animal such as lion's fat (0.45% frequency of citation) for certain treatments. Survey showed that some medicinal insects are involved in the same disease treatments in both localities. Overall, the kind of association of medicinal insects with plants varied from one province to another. Globally, Apis mellifera was most medicinal insect associated with various plants that targeting a large spectrum of pathologies (Table 3).


Local knowledge regarding medicinal insects

Medicinal insects used

Our study revealed nineteen (19) medicinal insects used by traditional healers, showing very rich ethnomedicine knowledge in the two provinces of Burkina Faso. There are similarities with other studies carried out in the world generally, and in Africa specifically, where bees (Hymenoptera) and their products, but also beetles (Coleoptera) and cockroaches (Blattodea), were predominant in the list of the therapeutic species [11, 14, 18]. Thus, insect and insect-derived products provide ingredients that have been a staple in traditional medicine for centuries in many parts of the world. In fact, their immunological, antiviral, analgesic, antibacterial, anti-cancer, diuretic, anesthetic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-rheumatic and immunomodulatory properties are well recognized [12, 27, 28]. The use of medicinal insects varied from one locality to another and also from one country to another. Then, the adult house cricket, Acheta domesticus (Gryllidae), is used for the treatment of deafness in Burkina Faso while in Latin American, it is used for the treatment of scabies, asthma, eczema, lithiasis, earache, oliguresis, rheumatism, urine retention, urinary incontinence and ophthalmological problems [29]. As for locus Schistocerca gregaria (Acrididae), it is used by the traditional healers in Burkina Faso to treat wound. This insect is known to have antiproliferative activity [30,31,32] The Blattodae, Periplaneta americana, is used by the traditional healers in Burkina Faso to treat ear pain, but the same species has been used to treat asthma, toothaches and bronchitis by the Amerindians of the Amazon [33]. It is also used for an asthma treatment in Latin American folk medicine [29]. This property to treat pain is probably due to the presence of molecules isolated from the brains of these insects known to be excellent antibiotics v[34]. The therapeutic practice to use blister beetle Lytta vesicatoria for the treatment of urinary retention has also been reported in other studies undertaken by Read et al. [35]. and Tsuneo et al. [36]. These common uses are probably certainly due to the presence of cantharidin, a compound with notable effects on the urogenital system of vertebrates. In the past, it was prescribed as a remarkable aphrodisiac, but now it is used to induce mating in some domestic animals and as a therapy for some disorders of the urinary tract [14]. Furthermore, a longhorned beetle (Cerambycidae), dung beetle (Scarabaeus laticollis), and 7-spotted ladybirds (Coccinella septempunctata) are used to treat, respectively, breast crack, pain on urination and wound. The larvae of Diptera Musca domestica are used to treat sickle cell anemia and male infertility, respectively, in the province of Houët. As for Lepidoptera, the larvae of Cirina butyrospermi are recognized to have tonic properties in the study areas, as also noted by Oudhia et al. [37]. Its larvae have an ability to regulate blood pressure in hypertension. The fact that insect species are being used for the same purpose by several communities might indicate their pharmacological effectiveness. The widespread use of insects throughout the world suggest that traditional knowledge on zootherapy is to be studied more seriously, in order to lead to the discovery of new sources of drugs [38].

Stage of development of medicinal insects’ use

Overall insects are used at different stages of development. However, in our study, the egg stage was not cited. Larvae, pupae and adults’ stage have nutritional and medicinal qualities [39]. These authors point out that in general, the protein content was found to be higher along with the more mature developmental stages. Honeybee larvae were used for the treatment of male impotence and for raising libido in men. These are usually consumed directly within the wax combs. The use of larvae for treating infertility is probably due to their high protein content of mature larvae (15.4% of fresh weight) [40]. For Musca domestica, larvae are used in treating male infertility whereas in Japan, it is used in treating snake bites and fever, gut and stomach problems and eye disorders [12].

Insect products used in therapy

The insect products cited in our study are the nests of termite and honey and wax of bee. However, other results suggest, in addition to the bee products mentioned above, propolis and royal jelly [41]. Honey is the most widely used as bee product in traditional medicine and its use varies by region. This could be explained by the variation in the composition of honey depending on the region. Indeed, the composition of honey and its content of mineral and organic constituents are strongly linked to foraged flowers [8]. In addition to these products known to medicinal insects, the study showed that insects can impact certain materials and give them therapeutic benefits. This transformation could come from the secretions of these insects. Indeed, insect secretions have been shown to have therapeutic properties as regarding secretions from larvae of Lucia sericata [42, 43]. The nests of termite Macrotermes spp. and Trinervitermes spp. are used to treat diarrhea, fractures and used for its toning effect and those of Nasutitermes spp. is used as an anti-inflammatory activity. Healing properties of termite mounds could be explained by the fact that they contain xyloglucan, a hemicellulose in the wall of dicotyledons that reduces the frequency and duration of diarrhea [44]. Undegraded sugars present in termite droppings could explain their use as plaster to immobilize fractured limbs [45]. Interestingly, Apis mellifera, Vespula vulgaris, Sceliphron sp belonging to Hymenoptera are listed among medicinal insects and their products are used to treat different diseases around the world. Thus, the nest of Sceliphron sp. is used to treat mumps. As to Apis mellifera, besides honey used to treat asthma, burn, constipation, difficulty breathing, voice extinction, general fatigue, insomnia, intestinal helminthiasis, bladder lithiasis, heart diseases, and hip pain, other bee products are highly prized as medicines. Pollen (collected by bees), larvae and pupae have medicinal properties, i.e., pollen is used for the treatment of bleeding gastric ulcer and chronic prostatitis [46,47,48]. Propolis, which is a resinous substance collected from the buds of some trees and flowers by bees to repair damage to their hives, is used in Eastern Europe as an antiseptic and an anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of wounds and burns [49].

Correlations between medicinal insects and medicinal categories

Insects are used in the treatment of a wide variety of pathologies and symptoms. This broad spectrum of insect action could be understood if we consider the extreme variability of individuals of this class. Also, we can think of a great variability of the active molecules that can be contained in these different insects and products. PCA revealed a strong positive correlation between Cirina butyrospermi larvae and nutritional diseases. Indeed, shea caterpillars are very rich in protein (63%), but also in omega 3, iron, zinc, magnesium, phosphorus (5%) and vitamins A, D, E [50]. PCA has also shown that honey from bees is widely used in the treatment of gastroenterological pathologies. Indeed, it has been revealed that bee products can regulate digestive disorders (diarrhea, colitis, peptic ulcer) induced by the bacterium Helicobacter pylori [51]. Honey can be a complementary treatment for bacterial gastroenteritis in children [52]. This same PCA testified the use of Macrotermes sp. particularly its nest in the treatment of pathologies of rheumatology and gynecology. Other studies have also shown the implication of this insect's nest in the treatment of disorders related to human reproduction. Indeed, Zborowski [53]confirmed in his study that the queens of Macrotermes sp. were believed to have the power to treat female infertility and male impotence. This nest is also used against inflammatory diseases as it has been shown in Mahdi et al. [54].

Association between medicinal insects and plants

As for the association between insects and plants for the treatment of pathologies in the two study areas exhibits many variabilities. This fact could be explained by the different floristic knowledge of traditional healers in the different study areas. Here, plants (flowers, fruits, leaves, barks and roots) were added to insect and their products, either or adjuvant and therapeutic.


Insects or their products have therapeutic virtues affecting several categories of modern classical medicine. The predominant order cited in this current study is Orthoptera, Blattodea (exopterygota) and Hymenoptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera (endopterygota). Also, insects and products are used alone or in combination with ash, fat or with various organs of flowering or non-flowering plants. The predominantly used insect products are termite nests and bee honey in the two study areas. Honey is mainly used in the therapy of gastroenteritis and termite nests in the treatment of inflammatory and trauma diseases. The treatment of pathology in which an insect is used depends on the product with which it is combined and on the region. In fact, insects are used differently in most cases in the different survey areas. This study provides a new insight of medicinal insects and open new avenues for their putative valorization in Burkina Faso.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. Raven PH, Hassenzahl DM, Berg LR. Environment. 8th ed. Singapore: Wiley; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. Le Rapport sur le paludisme dans le monde; 2019.; Accessed 28 September 2021.

  3. Chosidow O. Scabies. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1718–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MAAH. Rapport de suivi-évaluation à mi-parcours de la campagne agropastorale 2018/2019 et de la situation alimentaire et nutritionnelle; 2018.

  5. Korgan M, Prokopy R. Agricultural entomology. In: Encyclopedia of insects. Academic Press; 2009.

  6. Su N-Y, Scheffrahn R H. Formosan subterranean termite, coptotermes formosanus shiraki (insecta: blattodea: rhinotermitidae). 2019; EENY-121.

  7. Carol AK, David WI, Nickolas MW. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1998;29:83–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lupoli R. L’insecte médicinal. Ancyrosoma. 2010;1:290.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson RH, Lyon WF. Insect pests of farm, garden, and orchard. 8th ed. New York: Wiley; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Huis A. Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chakravorty J, Ghosh S, Meyer-Rochow VB. Practices of entomophagy and entomotherapy by members of the Nyishi and Galo tribes, two ethnic groups of the state of Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer-Rochow VB. Therapeutic arthropods and other, largely terrestrial, folk-medicinally important invertebrates: a comparative survey and review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lupoli R. Des insectes pour guérir. Pour la science 2011; 407.

  14. Costa-Neto EM. Entomotherapy, or the medicinal use of insects. J Ethnobiol. 2005;25(1):93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta RK, Apitherapy SS. Holistic healing through the honeybee and bee products in countries with poor healthcare system. In: Beekeeping for poverty alleviation and livelihood security, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. pp. 413‑446. doi:

  16. Meyer-Rochow VB. Ethno-entomological observations from North Korea (officially known as the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jugli S, Chakravorty J, Meyer-Rochow VB. Zootherapeutic uses of animals and their parts: an important element of the traditional knowledge of the Tangsa and Wancho of eastern Arunachal Pradesh North-East India. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;22(5):4699–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mozhui L, Kakati LN, Meyer-Rochow VB. Entomotherapy: a study of medicinal insects of seven ethnic groups in Nagaland, North-East India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuqun L. Ben cao gang mu, In: Encyclopaedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non-western cultures 2008. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2008. pp. 399‑400.

  20. Pemberton RW. Insects and other arthropods used as drugs in Korean traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;65(3):207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng Z, Liu H, Lang J, Li Y, Shu M, Chen Z. A novel glycine-rich peptide derived from Drosophila with antibacterial activity. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73(3):769–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ratcliffe N, Azambuja P, Mello CB. Recent advances in developing insect natural products as potential modern day medicines. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meda A, Lamien CE, Millogo J, Romito M, Nacoulma OG. Therapeutic uses of honey and honeybee larvae in central Burkina Faso. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95(1):103–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontès J, Guinko S. Carte de la végétation et de l’occupation du sol du Burkina Faso : notice explicative. Toulouse: Ministère de la coopération Française1995; 66: 1–36.

  25. Sambaré O, Bognounou F, Wittig R, Thiombiano A. Woody species composition, diversity and structure of riparian forests of four watercourses types in Burkina Faso. J For Res. 2011;22(2):145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scholtz CH. The higher classification of southern African insects. Afr Entomol. 2016;24(2):545–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rokozeno D, Deka MK. Insect-based medicines: a review of present status and prospects of entomo-therapeutic resources for human ailment. Intern J Agric Environ Biotech. 2016;9(6):1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seabrooks L, Hu L. Insects: an underrepresented resource for the discovery of biologically active natural products. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2017;7(4):409–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Alves RR, Alves HN. The faunal drugstore: animal-based remedies used in traditional medicines in Latin America. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pettit GR, Meng Y, Herald DL, Knight JC, Day JF. Antineoplastic agents. 553: the texas grasshopper brachystolamagna. J Nat Prod. 2005;68(8):1256–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheseto X, Kuate SP, Tchouassi DP, Ndungu M, Teal PEA, Torto B. Potential of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera: Acrididae) as an unconventional source of dietary and therapeutic sterols. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0127171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Zhan Y, Zhang D, Dai B, Ma W, Qi J, Liu R. Eupolyphaga sinensis walker displays inhibition on hepatocellular carcinoma through regulating cell growth and metastasis signaling. Sci Rep. 2015;4(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Posey DA. Insects, foods, medecines and folklore in Amazonia, les insectes dans la tradition orale. 2003, pp. 221‑237.

  34. Lee S. Insect brains are rich stores of new antibiotics. Sci Daily; 2010.

  35. Read BE. Chinese materia medica: insect drugs, dragon & snake drugs, fish drugs. Taipei: Southern materials center; 1982.

  36. Tsuneo N, Yong-Hua M, Kenji I. Insect derived crude drugs in the Chinese song dynasty. J Ethnopharmacol. 1988;24(2–3):247–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Oudhia P. Traditional medicinal knowledge about common insects and mites in India. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2002;8(4):339–40.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Costa-Neto EM. Implications and applications of folk zootherapy in the state of Bahia. Northeastern Brazil Sust Dev. 2004;12(3):161–74.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer-Rochow VB, Gahukar RT, Ghosh S, Jung C. Chemical composition, nutrient quality and acceptability of edible insects are affected by species, developmental stage, gender, diet, and processing method. Foods. 2021;10(5):1036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Krell R. Value-added products from beekeeping. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  41. FAO: Le rôle des abeilles dans le développement rural: manuel sur la récolte, la transformation et la commercialisation des produits et services dérivés des abeilles. Rome : Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture; 2011.

  42. Bonn D. Maggot therapy: an alternative for wound infection. Lancet. 2000;356(9236):1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Téot L, Ouharzoune Y. Une revue pluridisciplinaire pour toute la communauté francophone des plaies et cicatrisations. Rev Francoph Cicatr. 2017;1(1):1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vidal. Le dictionnaire, 95é éd. Sciences & Techniques, France, ISBN: 978-2850913778, 2019; p. 3800.

  45. Louppe D. Les termites. In : Muséum d’histoire naturelle de Nantes ; 2016.

  46. Rugendorff EW, Weidner W, Ebeling L, Buck AC. Results of treatment with pollen extract (Cernilton N) in chronic prostatitis and prostatodynia. Br J Urol. 1993;71(4):433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yıldız O, Can Z, Saral O, Yulug E, Ozturk F, Aliyazicioglu R, Canpolat S, Kolayli S. Hepatoprotective potential of chestnut bee pollen on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic damages in rats. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ghosh S, Tchibozo S, Lanmantchion E, Meyer-Rochow VB, Jung C. Observations on how people in two locations of the plateau departement of southeast benin perceive entomophagy: a study from West Africa. Front Nutr. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bankova RV, Christov SP, Marcucci MC, Tsvetkova I, Kujumgiev A. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Brazilian propolis. Fitoterapia. 1999;2(70):190–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Morgane A, Toguyéni A, Otchoumou A, Zoungrana-Kaboré CY, Kouamelan EP. Nutritional qualities of edible caterpillars Cirina butyrospermi in southwestern of Burkina Faso. IJIAS. 2016;18(2):639–45.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Manyi-Loh CE, Clarke AM, Munzhelele T, Green E, Mkwetshana NF, Ndip RN. Selected South African honeys and their extracts possess in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity. Arch Med Res. 2010;41(5):324–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Abdulrhman MA, Mekawy MA, Awadalla MM, Mohamed AH. Bee honey added to the oral rehydration solution in treatment of gastroenteritis in infants and children. J Med Food. 2010;13(3):605–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. De Zborowski I. Atlas d’élevage du bassin du lac Tchad : Livestock atlas of the lake Chad basin. CIRAD, CITA, Montpellier: France, ISBN-10–2876142481; 1996.

  54. Mahdi D, Hubert J, Renault JH, Martinez A, Schubert A, Engel KM, et al. Chemical profile and antimicrobial activity of the fungus-growing termite strain Macrotermes bellicosus used in tradionnal medicine in the republic of Benin. Molecules. 2020;25:21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the informants from the study area who shared their traditional knowledge. We appreciate the support of the authorities for the authorizations granted. Ouango Ouango Mamadou is a Ph.D. studentship of the University Joseph KI-ZERBO.


This work was carried out with the support of University Joseph KI-ZERBO (University budget 2019–2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MO, RR, SFD and OG conceived and performed the study. MO, RR, SFD and OG analyzed the data. MO, RR, SFD, NO and OG wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Gnankiné.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouango, M., Romba, R., Drabo, S.F. et al. Indigenous knowledge system associated with the uses of insects for therapeutic or medicinal purposes in two main provinces of Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 18, 50 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: