Skip to main content

The ethnobotanical heritage of Lotkuh, a high-altitude tribal haven of Chitral, the Eastern Hindu Kush, Pakistan

Abstract

Background

In northwestern Pakistan, Lotkuh is a high-altitude terrain nestled within the eastern Hindu Kush region. Enclaved by towering peaks and harboring a unique culture, the region mirrors the geographical and cultural diversity of Pakistan. In this geographically isolated region, a treasure trove of ethnobotanical knowledge unfolds through generations of interaction between the inhabitants and indigenous plants, resulting in a profound understanding of the plant uses in nutritional, medicinal, cultural, and ritual contexts. Thus, the study seeks to gather, analyze, and document the indigenous knowledge of plant utilization of the distinct tribal culture.

Methods

Through semi-structured questionnaires, inventory interviews, and participatory workshops, data were collected by engaging a cohort of 120 local respondents. The collected data were then classified into nine distinct use categories, following which quantitative indices were calculated.

Results

The research identified a total of 150 plant species spanning across 59 different families and categorized them into 9 distinct usage groups. Among these, Astragalus oihorensis, Astragalus owirensis, Cicer nuristanicum, Geranium parmiricum, and Rochelia chitralensis stand out as novel species with distinctive applications. Notably, medicinal use garnered 600 reports, while animal feed, veterinary applications, human consumption, and toxicity recorded 500, 450, 425, and 104 reports, respectively. Informant consensus was high ranging between 0.8 and 0.9 with most agreement on human food and animal feed category. Platanus orientalis and Juglans regia, with RFC 0.91, were the most cited. The Family Importance Value (FIV) of Juglandaceae and Platanaceae, each with an FIV of 0.91, and Capparidaceae with an FIV of 0.83 indicate the intricate role the families play.

Conclusions

In this study, we explore 150 ethnobotanical species, uncovering novel entries within ethnobotanical literature. Among these, several species showcase unique uses previously undocumented in Pakistani literature. Our research sheds light on the intricate interaction between plants and the distinct cultural landscape of the Lotkuh region.

Background

The people of the eastern Hindukush region in northwestern Pakistan have a long history of using wild plants to sustain their life amidst the rocky, narrow valleys of the snow-capped mountains. The plants of the high-altitude mountain ecosystem have provided the dwellers with everything from food to fodder, medicine to firewood, and cultural raw materials. Since they have always lived in the highlands, the people of northwestern Pakistan have a much deeper relationship with wild flora to satisfy their everyday essentials [1]. Inhabitants of the Hindukush region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border have a distinctive culture, which includes a unique food system based on wild food plants and the use of plants for both health and economic well-being [2].

Throughout the ages, man has reaped direct and indirect advantages from the diverse array of wild flora. Wild plant resources have offered food to alleviate hunger, plant materials for textile production, timber for construction purposes, medicinal plants for therapeutic applications, and commodities for ceremonial merriments. Particularly, a considerable portion of the population in developing countries in recent days relies significantly on the income generated from the trade of wild plant products [3,4,5]. Furthermore, for economic motives, developed countries persistently procure high-value wild products such as mushrooms and medicinal herbs from their developing neighborhood [6]

Many people, especially in remote areas, rely on wild edible plants for their daily dietary needs [7, 8]. Wild plants in many cultures have a tremendous impact on human life, primarily because of their nutritional importance. Today, it is undeniable that wild plants are used as a source of nutritional supplements [9]. For generations, rural communities worldwide have incorporated natural herbs into their diets through traditional foods, herbal juices, teas, and beverages. It is an established truth that medicinal plants are a significant source of newly discovered drugs [10]. Rural communities have been consuming a diverse range of wild foods for an extended period, with the preparation techniques being handed down from one generation to the next [11].

Traditional ethnobotanical knowledge (TEK) is inherited from one generation to the other as a subsequent part of the indigenous knowledge heritage of the rural communities [12]. The knowledge of traditional plant utilization is changing because of sociocultural changes in local communities, and ethnobotanical knowledge is being seriously hampered by industrialization and globalization. Because of this, only roughly 20 edible plant species account for about 90% of our daily food, even though there are around 20,000 nutritious species of plants in the wild. In most of Asia, the local traditional knowledge of plant resources is on the brink of extinction in rural areas, while in most urban settings no remnant is left behind [13]. Therefore, it is imperative to gather and document the traditional knowledge in rural areas, where it is practiced, to pass it to the next generation [14].

While ethnobotanical literature exists in Pakistan, the northwestern regions remain largely unexplored due to their remote and challenging accessibility. Lotkuh, situated in the secluded northwestern part of the country, stands distinct in geography, culture, and language from the rest of Pakistan. Its unique climate fosters a diverse flora, contributing to the country's botanical richness. Nestled among towering mountains, the inhabitants possess invaluable knowledge of plant usage for sustenance, medicine, cultural practices, and rituals. This pioneering endeavor marks the inaugural effort to document and conserve the ethnobotanical heritage of Lotkuh's ancient culture. Led by a native researcher, this initiative is a crucial response to the threats of cultural dilution and globalization.

Materials and methods

Geographical location of the study area

The Lotkuh region, which serves as the research area, occupies the northwest of Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Geographically, the study area is stretched between 35° 47ʹ 52ʺ to 36° 29ʹ 10ʺ north latitudes and 71° 11ʹ 52ʺ to 71° 54ʹ 42ʺ east longitudes. The valley has a rugged landscape and is located next to the Wakhan Corridor. The majestic Eastern Hindu Kush's vast biodiversity is reflected in the territory. The Terich Mir (7692 m a.s.l.), the highest peak in the Hindu Kush range, is located on the eastern of the research area. Throughout the year, these huge mountain ranges are blanketed in perpetual snow and glaciers. The elevation of the study area ranges from 1600 to 7000 m. The research area is subdivided into three sub-valleys, viz, Karim Abad, Arkari, and Garam Chashma. The geographic location is further illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical map, depicting the data points   in the study area (Lotkuh), Chitral

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study area

The research area is culturally rich, and different local languages are spoken in the region. We selected 120 informants from the study area for our study. During the survey, detailed demographic data of the informants were acquired. The data included information on population, age, gender, ethnicity, language, religion, and occupation. The demographic details are provided in Table 1. The principle ecological features of the villages that serve as data points are illustrated in Table 2. Following are the major languages as the mother tongue of the born-in native inhabitants of the area.

Table 1 Geographical outline and sociodemographic profile of the respondents of each village visited during data collection
Table 2 The principle ecological features of villages as data points for the ethnobotanical study

Khowar

Khowar is the lingua franca of this region and a major source of communication and researchers’ tool to collect data [15].

Yidgha

In the western sub-valleys of Lotkuh, Yidgha is the most spoken language. However, the population speaking Yidgha is smaller in comparison with other languages [16].

Lotkohiwar

A smaller group of people in the area speak Lotkohiwar, a language mostly related to Khowar but with minor differences in meaning and accent [17].

Sheikhan war

Some of the inhabitants aligned with the border of Afghanistan speak Sheikhan War. The people adhering to this language number very few. Gobor, a small village in proximity to Afghanistan, is the safe dwelling of the inhabitants who speak Sheikhan War [17].

Bashgali

Bashgali is a language spoken in the study area with limited comprehension among the local population. It distinctively differs from Khowar, which is the predominant language spoken by the majority in the region [18].

Dari

This language is considered non-native and was introduced to the valley due to the influence of Nasir Khisraw, the eleventh-century, poet, and philosopher. The charm and melody of the poetry attracted a considerable stratum of the society to adhere to it. One of his followers had come to this part of the region and got settled here permanently. The neighboring country, Afghanistan, was intervened by the then USSR, and as a result, a huge influx of migrants rushed to this area. Since Garam Chashma was easily accessible from Badakhshan, many Afghans chose to stay back and a few of the migrants are still living here. The people of Badakhshan communicated in Dari and gave birth to this language in the valley [19].

Ethnicity

The study area is ethnically diverse, consisting of two distinct ethnic groups.

The Sunnis

These people practice the faith of Islam and are obedient to the Sharia of the Prophet, Mohammad. They live in harmony with the rest of the ethnic group.

The Ismailis

This ethnic group follows His Highness the Agha Khan as Imam (the spiritual leader whom they are obedient and followers). In most villages of Lotkuh the Ismaili ethnic group constitutes the majority population. This ethnic community coexists in perfect harmony with Sunnis, engaging in each other's rites, rituals, and cultural practices.

Data collection

Data gathering in the current study relied on three methods: a semi-structured interview to collect data from the selected respondents; an inventory interview and a participatory workshop. Applying quantitative indices like Use Report (UR), Informants Consensus Factor (ICF), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Use Value (UV), Fidelity Level (FL), Family Importance Value (FIV), Jaccard index (JI), and Pearson’s Pairwise comparison, the data were evaluated.

Semi-structured interviews

A total of 120 respondents were selected including males and females from diverse fractions of the society comprising educated professionals, farmers, local healers, nomads, and wildlife managers. Each informant first participated in a semi-structured interview to gather information about the common names of plants in the area, their uses, and the locations of collecting sites. The plant uses were then grouped into 9 distinct use categories (Table 3).

Table 3 Ethnobotanical use categories of plant taxa

Inventory interviews

All plant specimens to be investigated were collected and shown to the respondents one by one to investigate the uses of these plant resources. The method is more useful when the local names are unknown to the investigator [20]. The informants were first asked the local names of the plants and their uses. These informants were recognized in their community for their extensive knowledge of the regional native flora.

Participatory workshops

A participatory workshop was conducted to validate the indigenous names and traditional uses of local plants. Members of the community were extended invitations to attend the workshop, during which the objectives were clearly outlined and demonstrated to them [21]. To conduct the workshop efficiently and make information gathering easier, the participants were separated into three groups. The groups were then shown the collected plant specimens and images. Thus, it was possible to establish the correct local names of the gathered specimens.

Field survey, plant collection, preservation, and identification

The field survey commenced in April 2021 and extended until December 2022. Villages and sub-valleys were the subjects of an intensive field survey. These sub-valleys and villages were the representatives of the total study area. Plant collection was made along with detailed data on habitat, life form, and morphology. The core of the identification was mostly based on Flora of Pakistan (http://www.efloras.org/), Tropicos (http://www.tropicos.org/), and the naming was confirmed by the World Flora Online (https://www.worldfloraonline.org/). Following the standard herbarium protocols, the collected specimens were pressed, dried, and mounted on herbarium sheets. The collected specimens were then submitted to the herbarium at the Department of Botany, the University of Peshawar, for reference.

Use report

Use reports are the information shared by the informants about the use of a species in a specific use category. Here the information taken from a participant (i) about the use of plant species (s) in a specific use category (u) is collected [22]. In a particular survey that comprises NS species (s1, s2,……sNS) spreading over use-categories NC (u1, u2, u3,….uNC) and N informants…. (i1, i2,……iN), then the following formula can be employed to calculate use reports (UR);

$$UR={\sum }_{u={u}_{1}}^{uNC}{\sum }_{i={i}_{1}}^{iN}{UR}_{ui}$$
(1)

Informant consensus factor

When it is essential to scrutinize the homogeneity of the data provided by the informants in each use category involving a species, the informant consensus factor is used [23].

$$ICF=\frac{Nur-Nt}{\left(Nur-1\right)}$$
(2)

where ‘Nur’ denotes the number of use reports for a specific plant-use category and ‘Nt’ is the number of taxa associated with that use category. The value of ICF ranges between 0 and 1, where a value close to 1 indicates that relatively few taxa are used by a large proportion of the informants, and a value closer to 0 indicates that the informants differ in their use of taxa within a use category [24].

Relative frequency of citation

The most popular/used plants in an area are determined using this index. RFC value ranges from 0 (when it is not being used in that area) to 1 (if all the informants consider the plant species to be valuable). RFC illustrates the regional significance of each species without taking use categories into account [25]. To calculate (RFC), the following formula is used;

$$RFC=\frac{FC}{N}$$
(3)

where ‘FC’ is the frequency of citation, while ‘N’ represents the total number of informants participating in the study.

Use value

Use value refers to a taxon's relative importance as determined by its utility. The following formula is used to calculate the use value of a species [26].

$$UV=\frac{{\sum }_{1}^{n}{U}_{i}}{N}$$
(4)

where UV denotes use value, while Ui and N represent use reports and the number of informants, respectively.

Fidelity level

Some of the plants of one area are preferred in their utilization over others because of the effectiveness of the species. This preference is called fidelity level. The following formula is used to calculate the fidelity of the species [27].

$$FL\%=\frac{Ip}{Iu} \times 100$$
(5)

where Ip represents the proportion of informants who mentioned a species for a certain use. The number of informants who reported the same species for different uses is represented by the symbol lu. Fidelity levels vary from 1 to 100%. Values less than 100% show that the species is used for several purposes, while values closer to 100% show that it is utilized for a specific purpose.

Family importance value

The family importance value was calculated with the help of the subsequent formula. In the given formula ‘FIV’ represents the family importance value, while ‘RFC’ and ‘N’ denote the family frequency of citation of the family and the number of species within the family, respectively [27].

$$FIV=\frac{RFC}{N}$$
(6)

Jaccard distance

This index proves useful when the aim is to compare one community to another or when seeking to identify similarities and differences among two or more use categories. Its calculation involves the application of the following formula [28].

$$Jaccard\, Distance=1-Jaccard \,Index$$
(7)

Results

The research involved 120 native participants, consisting of 71 males and 49 females, representing various professional backgrounds. The respondents belonged to 6 linguistic backgrounds with age brackets ranging from 20 to over 60 years as displayed in Table 1. The objectives were to collect information on the extent, composition, function, and utilization of plant resources. The informants from diverse linguistic groups provided use reports about different plant groups as depicted by the chord diagram (Fig. 2). The participants identified 150 plant species belonging to 59 families encompassing 1 family of Pteridophytes, 3 gymnosperm families, and 55 angiosperm families.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chord diagram displaying affiliation of the linguistic group to the use categories

Use reports and informant consensus factor

In this work, use reports were systematically classified into nine principal categories, as outlined in Table 3. These categories served as representative groupings for the responses gathered across the entire study area. The distribution of use reports, along with the number of species associated with each use category, is presented in Table 4. The medicinal category displayed the highest species count, with 82 mentioned by respondents, yielding a total of 600 use reports. In contrast, the animal feed category encompassed 76 species, with a corresponding 500 use reports. The toxic use category comprised only 2 species, totaling 104 use reports. Furthermore, the informant consensus factor was markedly high, reaching 0.9 for all use categories, except for medicinal, animal feed, and human food categories, which displayed an informant consensus factor of 0.8.

Table 4 Consensus among informants regarding taxa usage across various use categories

Relative frequency of citations

Table 5 shows the relative frequencies of taxa surveyed, highlighting their Relative Frequency of citations (RFC). Platanus orientalis and Juglans regia lead the list with an RFC of 0.91. Following closely are Capparis spinosa, Morus alba, Thymus linearis, and Quercus baloot, each boasting an RFC of 0.83. Elaeagnus angustifolia secures an RFC of 0.79. Additionally, Cannabis sativa, Carum carvi, and Cucurbita maxima exhibit significant presence, each reaching an RFC of 0.75.

Table 5 Quantitative assessment and utilization patterns of ethnobotanical taxa in Lotkuh, Chitral, Eastern Hindukush, Pakistan

Use value

The use values (UV) of the plant species surveyed are presented in Table 5. Conspicuously, Juglans regia stands out with a UV of 0.82, followed closely by Elaeagnus angustifolia at 0.81, and Capparis spinosa at 0.76. Other significant species include Rheum webbianum with a UV of 0.75, Carum carvi 0.68, Ferula jaeschkeana 0.50, Cucurbita maxima at 0.66, Hippophae rhamnoides at 0.68, Berberis lyceum at 0.57, and Nasturtium officinale a UV of 0.50. Some of the plants with higher use values are shown in Fig. 3. Use values provide an insight into the relative importance of each species in the context of their utilization, a necessary aspect of our research findings.

Fig. 3
figure 3figure 3

Some of the ethnobotanically quoted plants. A Rehum webbianum B Primula denticulata C Sophora mollis D Geranium wallichianum E Berberis lyceum F Alcea rosea G Prangos pabularia H Rosa webbiana I Capparis spinosa J Hiphophae rhamnoides K Anthemis cotula L Tamarix dioica

Fidelity level

Table 5 presents the fidelity levels of the taxa considered in the study, comprising a total of 42 species with a 100% fidelity level. Prominent examples of these highly faithful species include Adiantum cappillus-veneris, Aristida cyanantha, Peganum harmala, etc. Conversely, the lowest fidelity level, at 34%, was observed in Tagetes minuta. The plant species exhibiting 100% fidelity level span various utilization categories, such as medicinal, human food, animal feed, technology, and toxic. Specifically, the animal feed category displays the highest number of plants with 18 species at 100% fidelity, followed by 13 species in the medicinal category. Human food encompasses 7 species with perfect fidelity, while both the toxic and technology categories feature 2 species each. Amidst the spectrum of fidelity levels, there are species like Cuscuta europaea (98%), Trachydium roylei (90%), and Quercus baloot (92%).

Family importance value

In Table 5, we present the family importance values (FIV) of the surveyed families, showcasing a remarkable diversity in their significance. Markedly, Juglandaceae and Platanaceae emerge as the top-ranking families, each boasting a high FIV of 0.91. Following closely, Capparidaceae achieves a notable FIV of 0.83, while Paeoniaceae, Nitrariaceae, Portulacaceae, and Cannabaceae also contribute significantly with FIVs ranging around 0.75.

These elevated FIVs for specific plant families underscore their pronounced importance within the cultural context. On the other hand, certain families exhibit lower FIVs, indicating comparatively lesser cultural significance. Notably, Boraginaceae, Typhaceae, Araceae, and Pteridaceae secure lower FIVs, ranging from 0.08 to 0.25. The contrasting FIV values shed light on the varying degrees of cultural importance attributed to different plant families within the study area.

Jaccard distance

Jaccard distance is displayed in Fig. 4. It varies between 0.63 as the minimum and the highest value of 1. The use category (Toxic) in at maximum Jaccard distance with all other groups showing zero similarity with the rest of the use groups, while the least distance (0.63) was observed between (the Timber and Technology) use groups. The Jaccard distance heat map dendrogram shows the clustering of the use categories. As the species in different use groups overlap, the dendrogram has three major clusters at the base.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pairwise Jaccard’s distance heatmap showing the distance between the use categories

Discussion

A comparative analysis of data with existing literature in Pakistan

A comparative analysis was conducted on the types and utilization of ethnobotanically significant taxa, juxtaposed with existing data, to discern unique plant species and distinct cultural uses prevalent in the study area. The study presents new ethnobotanical species and approaches for utilization that have not previously been documented. The medicinal category stands out with the highest number of use reports, totaling 600 as detailed in Table 4. This keen reliance on medicinal plant use can be attributed to the challenging geographical terrain of the Hindukush region and the lack of essential healthcare facilities, as highlighted in a prior study [29]. Though literature is available on the medicinal plants of northern Pakistan [30], we report some novel species, novel methods, and target uses. Astragalus oihorensis is used to improve infertility in males and females, while Astragalus owirensis is used against whooping cough. Similarly, Cicer nuristanicum, Geranium parmiricum, Rochelia chitralensis, and Cousinia chitralensis are new species with traditional medicinal uses reported in this work. Adiantum cappillus-veneris is widely reported from many parts of northern Pakistan [6, 31], but it is used to deal with human infertility in this region. Ephedra gerardiana is widely mentioned with medicinal uses [6, 32], while in this region it is widely used to make snuff and sold in the market, a threat to slowing growing and less abundant species [33]. Nepeta cataria is the herb consumed by Markhor, soon after the animal sustains injuries, thus a wild healing agent [34]. Primula denticulata has been used for disorders like asthma, and bronchitis [35], to treat cattle disease [36], but not for pink eye disorder as our study suggests.

The animal feed category encompasses 76 species and 500 use reports. Livestock rearing serves as the primary means of sustenance for those residing in the mountainous regions, a reality consistent with the inhabitants of the study area located in the eastern Hindukush [6]. The plants in the wild of the study area are not only sources of domestic animals but also sustain the life of wild ungulates like the Markhor (Capra falconeri cashmeriensis) which relies on Nepeta cataria as medicine when wounded and forages Ziziphora clinopodiodes during lactation. Such plant species are the backbone to sustain the conservation of iconic species like the Markhor [37]. The Himalayan snow cock (Tetraogallus himalayensis) eats Prunus prostrata and the Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) consumes the fruit of Arum italicum. Conservation of the unique wildlife of this area is directly associated with some of the key plant species [38].

Livestock rearing and herding are integral to the livelihoods of the people in this area, serving as the cornerstone of their existence. Certain plant species such as Quercus baloot, Juniperus excelsa, and Betula utilis exhibit sparse populations and slow growth rates, making them particularly vulnerable to significant consumption pressures. These species were frequently cited, highlighting the intensity of the demands placed upon them [39].

Both urban and rural communities have long prioritized the health of their domesticated and companion animals. In contrast to urban people, residents of the mountains choose wild plants for the good health of their animals [40]. Given the limited access to human healthcare facilities in this area, the challenge is exacerbated when it comes to addressing animal health. Nomads, shepherds, and pastoralists have traditionally relied on plant-based remedies for the well-being of their animals since history and the practice continues [41]. Cannabis sativa was used as feed for polo horses to keep them warm in winter, while in most literature it is a potent drug [42]. In this cultural context, the utilization of Juncus himalensis for treating goat pox, Trachydium roylei for combating liver fluke attacks, Hippuris vulgaris for addressing equine influenza in horses, Astragalus oihorensis for enhancing cattle fertility, Tribulus terrestris for maintaining warmth in hunting dogs, are not visible within ethnobotanical literature [43,44,45].

The human food category has 425 use reports by the informants and embraces 49 species. Our research has shed light on unconventional food plants within the region, with a focus on enhancing food security. Allium chitralicum and Allium carolinianum are among the wild food plants remembered by respondents for their historical uses, particularly during times of famine [2, 44]. Pinus gerardiana, Ferula jaeschkeana, and Rheum webbianum not only serve as edible resources but also constitute the primary sources of income for the local population. However, the methods and quantities in which these resources are collected currently contradict sustainable practices. It is imperative to provide the local community with training on the judicious utilization of WFPs [33]. Capparis spinosa, Chenopodium pamiricum, Chenopodium foliosum, and Thymus linearis are also common wild food plants. However, the collection of floral buds of Capparis spinosa is widespread, discouraging seed production [46]. Many informants have recognized edible wild plants that contain ample nutritional and mineral content capable of meeting human dietary requirements [47].

Within the culturally vibrant study region, plants hold significance not only for their utilitarian purposes but also for their aesthetic appeal and role in cultural celebrations[48]. Certain plants are deeply intertwined with the local belief systems, adding layers of meaning and symbolism to their use [49]. Wearing a wooden amulet made from Pistacia khibenjuk around the neck is thought to offer protection to newborns, shielding them from mortality. On the 21st of March, Juniperus communis is smoked inside households as part of a religious observance to mark the start of the new year. This ritual is believed to serve as a safeguard against malevolent influences and illnesses throughout the upcoming year [50].

In the realm of Khowar poetry, verses sway with the grace of Elaeagnus angustifolia, Tagetes minuta, and Primula denticulata. Poets, fascinated by the fragrance and colors of these plants, weave them into metaphors to extol the beauty of their beloveds. These plants hold unique symbolism within Khowar poetry, not referenced in other works [51]. The data elucidated several culturally significant crafts and tools unique to the local community, distinguishing them from practices found in other cultures. Trachomitum venetum is used to weave ropes, while Acer caesium serves as the primary material for crafting polo sticks [52]. Fraxinus xanthoxyloides finds its purpose in the creation of agricultural implements. The Chitrali sitar, a long-necked, plucked-string musical instrument, is crafted from the wood of Morus alba [50]. These plants not only carry cultural significance but also contribute to the local economy through cash earnings and offer potential for cultivation and sustainable utilization.

Table 4 indicates that 13 taxa serve as timber sources, while 12 are utilized for fuelwood purposes. Among the most prevalent timber species identified are Populus alba, Populus nigra, Salix alba, Morus alba, Platanus orientalis, Morus nigra, Betula utilis, and Juniperus excelsa. Of specific concern are Betula utilis and Juniperus excelsa, which face extensive utilization and have few remaining patches of vegetation [53].

In terms of fuelwood, Quercus baloot, Juniperus excelsa, Artemisia brevifolia, and Sophora mollis emerge as the most frequently cited species. The data highlight the necessity for providing alternative energy options to residents to lighten the consumption pressure on these species [54]. The use category labeled as 'toxic' exhibits the least number of species, with 104 use reports. The residents of this region possess knowledge about the potentially harmful flora and actively discourage the utilization of such species by humans [55].

Informant consensus factor

Table 3 presents the informant consensus factor (ICF) for the nine identified use categories in this study. Overall, the ICF ranges from 0.8 to 0.9, indicating a relatively high level of agreement among informants. Categories such as TECH, VU, TIM, FW, SYM, and TOX exhibit an ICF of 0.9, while MED, AF, and HF have an ICF of 0.8. The ICF reflects the consensus among informants regarding the specific uses of plant species, with values ranging from 0 to 1. Values closer to 1 suggest greater agreement among respondents on taxon utilization, while values closer to 0 indicate either disagreement, species diversity, or less shared information among informants [56]. Our results indicate a substantial level of agreement among informants, suggesting shared knowledge about the benefits of plants for specific purposes. This trend is principally marked in rural areas within mountain landscapes, where limited urbanization exists, and residents heavily rely on plant resources.

Relative frequency of citation

The significance of a taxon to a specific culture is determined by its relative frequency of citation. Well-known species tend to be the most utilized [57]. Platanus orientalis and Juglans regia have exceptionally high relative frequencies of citations, both attaining 0.91. As illustrated in Table 5, these species are versatile, contributing to various use categories such as technology and craft (TECH), timber (TIM), symbolic (SYM), and human food (HF). Their diverse roles make them vital to the local community, establishing their regional importance [25, 58]. Following closely are Capparis spinosa, Morus alba, Thymus linearis, and Quercus baloot, each boasting an RFC of 0.83. Elaeagnus angustifolia secures an RFC of 0.79. Additionally, Cannabis sativa, Carum carvi, and Cucurbita maxima exhibit significant presence, each reaching an RFC of 0.75. Plants with economic significance tend to capture the interest of local communities, a trend observed in many Asian countries [59].

Fidelity level

Table 5 presents the fidelity levels of the taxa considered in the study, comprising a total of 42 species with a fidelity level of 100%. Prominent examples of these highly faithful species include Adiantum cappillus-veneris, Aristida cyanantha, Peganum harmala, etc. Certain species flash more in one specific use category compared to others, and informants express greater confidence when revealing such a taxon [60]. Specifically, the animal feed category displays the highest number of plants with 18 species at 100% fidelity. The snow-capped mountains provide seasonal fodder for animals, and herders are required to select the best options for their livestock [61, 62]. In the medicinal category, 13 species show 100% fidelity showing that people have assigned specific roles to some plants specifically curing ailments [63]. Human food encompasses 7 species with perfect fidelity indicating the knowledge of the people about the nutritious plants in the mountains [64, 65]. Amidst the spectrum of fidelity levels, there are species like Cuscuta europaea (98%), Trachydium roylei (90%), and Quercus baloot (92%), reflecting a historical and enduring use by the community.

Family importance value

Table 5 demonstrates the family importance values (FIV) of the families surveyed, revealing a diversity in their significance. Markedly, Juglandaceae and Platanaceae stand out as the top-ranking families, each boasting a substantial FIV of 0.91. The significance of Juglandaceae, exemplified by species like Juglans regia, extends to the local communities due to its multifaceted contributions in terms of nutrition, medicine, and income generation [64, 65]. Platanaceae, particularly with the presence of Platanus orientalis as a primary source of timber production, holds greater importance. Furthermore, the family carries a significant symbolic value, with the presence of Platanus orientalis in the yard being regarded as a mark of distinction for a noble family [66]. Following closely, Capparidaceae achieves an FIV of 0.83 as it is a source of medicinal and food plants. Capparis spinosa is the widely consumed herb in the area in local cuisine and a broad-spectrum medicinal plant as well [67]. High FIVs for specific plant families underscore their pronounced importance within the cultural context. On the other hand, certain families exhibit lower FIVs, indicating comparatively lesser cultural significance. Notably, Boraginaceae, Typhaceae, Araceae, and Pteridaceae secure lower FIVs, ranging from 0.08 to 0.25.

Jaccard distance

The Jaccard distance, depicted in Fig. 4, and a cluster dendrogram in Fig. 5 show range from 0.63 to its highest at 1. Certain taxa establish versatility with numerous use reports, resulting in lower Jaccard distances, whereas other species exhibit fidelity to a single-use group, leading to maximum distances. Conspicuously, the use category "Toxic" exhibits the maximum Jaccard distance with all other groups, indicating zero similarity with the rest of the use groups. Conversely, the smallest distance (0.63) is observed between the "Timber" and "Technology" use groups as both share tree species [4].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Jaccard distance heatmap dendrogram showing the cluster of use categories

Data novelty in terms of food security, public health, and environment

The findings of this study shed light on the intricate relationship between environmental changes and food security, particularly in the Hindukush region of northwestern Pakistan. As climate change exacerbates, communities across this area, characterized by their reliance on mountain ecosystems, face amplified vulnerability [68]. With the looming risks to food security in the Hindukush Himalayas, the mountain dwellers are expected to encounter persistent insecurity challenges in the future [69]. We discovered that a variety of wild plants were frequently incorporated into both traditional cuisines and consumed raw as snacks. Allium carolinianum, Allium barszczewskii, Allium chitralicum, Cotoneaster affinis, Prunus prostrata, Rheum emodi, Rheum webbianum, Crataegus songarica, Elaeagnus angustifolia, Berberis lyceum, Ferula jaeschkeana, Morus nigra, Mentha royleana, and Mentha longifolia are some of the most mentioned raw snakes shown in Table 5. This reliance on wild food plants is not merely a historical practice but rather an ongoing aspect of daily sustenance, indicating a profound adaptation of local communities to their environment [70]. The study highlights the mobility of pastoralists and common locals who traverse the mountains, particularly for seasonal harvests of these wild food plants [71]. Thus, the insights garnered from this study offer valuable perspectives on the multifaceted dimensions of food security within the context of environmental change and local adaptation strategies.

In addition to raw snakes, the local community harvests a variety of wild vegetables with high nutritional value, which are then freshly prepared in diverse local cuisines [72] or preserved for winter consumption, ensuring a year-round food supply. Allium carolinianum, Nasturtium officinale, Codonopsis clematidea, Capparis spinosa, Amaranthus viridis, Plantago lanceolata, Rumex longifolius, and Portulaca oleracea are commonly cited by locals as staple ingredients in their cuisine [41]. These species have historically served as vital sources of sustenance during periods of famine and political turmoil, offering nourishment even across borders during conflicts [73]. Therefore, it provides understanding into the species that could potentially serve as food when necessary.

Public health is a major concern in mountains of northern Pakistan [74]. This research sheds light on previously undocumented plants in Pakistani ethnobotanical literature, as well as innovative uses for familiar species. Among the noteworthy discoveries are Astragalus owirensis, Cicer nuristanicum, Geranium parmiricum, Rochelia chitralensis, and Cousinia chitralensis, which emerge as frequently cited novel species. According to an estimate out the 6000 medicinal plant species present in Pakistan 700 are medicinally important [75]. The novel species documented in the current ethnobotanical study have the potential to integrate into folk medicine, aligning with the World Health Organization's advocacy for alternative medicines and preventative healthcare, especially in developing nations [76]. In Pakistan, the traditional Unani and Ayurvedic healing systems are gaining recognition for their therapeutic efficacy. However, the traditional knowledge associated with valuable medicinal plants faces significant threats to its preservation. In Pakistan the Unani and Ayurvedic systems have been increasing therapeutic qualities, but the valuable medicinal plants knowledge system is threatened [77].

In addition to identifying novel species, this study also explores innovative uses for familiar ones. For instance, the utilization of Adiantum cappillus-veneris, as documented by in addressing human infertility, is a noteworthy discovery [6, 31]. Ephedra gerardiana is being processed into snuff and commercially traded, posing a threat to its sustainability and the conservation of less common species. Nepeta cataria, recognized traditionally (Kakakhel, 2020), has been observed in this study as a wild healing agent for Markhor, the iconic national animal of Pakistan. Similarly, while Primula denticulata has historically been employed for treating ailments such as asthma and bronchitis [35] and even utilized in veterinary medicine for cattle diseases [36], our research uncovers its potential efficacy in treating pink eye disorder, expanding its known applications.

Ethnobotany offers profound insights into the myriad of plant species and their sustainable utilization to address pressing environmental issues [78]. In our research area, the sparse vegetation is a result of its location within the dry temperate rain shadow zone. Our findings reveal that certain plant species serve multifaceted roles and are frequently cited. However, these species face vulnerability due to increased consumption. For instance, Quercus baloot is noted by informants as a primary source of fuelwood, yet it also serves as the sole winter forage for wild herbivores like the Markhor when snow blankets the landscape [37]. Rheum webbianum, a scattered species, is a highly demanded wild food plant, while the collectors uproot it in during harvest, a method that can question the conservation of the species [79]. Artemisia brevifolia as seen in the field study is the major soil binder, while it has a relatively high use value of 0.60 and is uprooted to collect for fuel. Such a practice has already caused flash floods in the study area [80]. Some rare gymnosperms like Ephedra gerardiana with a high frequency of citation 0.41 and fidelity level of 75 are burnt to ash to make snuff that is sold in the market. Again, such a process can cause environmental degradation as the species density is comparatively low in the region.

Conclusion

The study identified 150 plant species across 59 families, unveiling novel ethnobotanical species, methods, and purposes of usage. For instance, Astragalus oihorensis is used to improve human infertility, while Astragalus owirensis for treating whooping cough. Similarly, Cicer nuristanicum, Geranium parmiricum, Rochelia chitralensis, and Cousinia chitralensis are novel species with traditional medicinal uses. The use of Adiantum cappillus-veneris for human infertility and Ephedra gerardiana in commercial-scale snuff are novel uses reported. The use of Nepeta cataria, by Markhor shortly following injuries, is new to ethnobotany. Previous studies show Primula denticulata is effective against asthma and bronchial issues. Our study suggests it to treat pink eye disorder. The medicinal category with 600 reports, implies the local population's exclusive dependence on medicinal plants. The ‘toxic’ category with 104 reports, denotes the community’s awareness of plants harmful to humans. Platanus orientalis and Juglans regia have high (0.91) citation frequencies, followed closely by Capparis spinosa, Morus alba, Thymus linearis, and Quercus baloot at 0.83. The animal feed category encompasses 18 species with 100% fidelity, indicating their special role as feed. Similarly, in the medicinal category, 13 species exhibit 100% fidelity, highlighting them as exceptional local medicine. In family rankings, Juglandaceae and Platanaceae secure top positions with a substantial family importance value (FIV) of 0.91 each, while Capparidaceae achieves an FIV of 0.83, emphasizing its significance as a source of medicinal and food plants. Ultimately, the research suggests sustainable utilization of medicinal plants such as Ephedra gerardiana, Capparis spinosa, Nepeta cataria, and Astragalus oihorensis. Quercus baloot serving as a primary food source for Markhor and fuel, demands sustainable utilization. Additionally, it is suggested to increase the cultivation of economically valuable species like Platanus orientalis and Juglans regia, which are highly utilized in the study area.

Availability of data and materials

All the data collected during the research work have been made available in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

TEK:

Traditional ethnobotanical knowledge

USSR:

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

UR:

Use Report

ICF:

Informants Consensus Factor

RFC:

Relative Frequency of Citation

UV:

Use Value

FL:

Fidelity Level

FIV:

Family Importance Value

MED:

Medicinal

AF:

Animal Feed

VU :

Veterinary Uses

TECH:

Technology

HF:

Human Food

TIM:

Timber

FW:

Fuel Wood

SYM:

Symbolic

TOX:

Toxic

References

  1. Abbas W, Hussain W, Hussain W, Badshah L, Hussain K, Pieroni A. Traditional wild vegetables gathered by four religious groups in Kurram District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, North-West Pakistan. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2020;67(6):1521–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10722-020-00926-3/FIGURES/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdullah A, et al. A comprehensive appraisal of the wild food plants and food system of tribal cultures in the hindu kush mountain range; a way forward for balancing human nutrition and food security. Sustain. 2021;13(9):5258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giday K, Lenaerts L, Gebrehiwot K, Yirga G, Verbist B, Muys B. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants from degraded dry afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia: species, uses and conservation challenges. J Herb Med. 2016;6(2):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2016.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kidane L, Gebremedhin G, Beyene T. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Ganta Afeshum District, Eastern Zone of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0266-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman IU, et al. “Historical perspectives of ethnobotany. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37(4):382–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.03.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad M, et al. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in high mountainous region of Chail valley (District Swat- Pakistan). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-36/TABLES/2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahishi P, Srinivasa BH, Shivanna MB. Medicinal plant wealth of local communities in some villages in Shimoga District of Karnataka, India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;98(3):307–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEP.2005.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mengistu F, Hager H. Wild edible fruit species cultural domain, informant species competence and preference in three districts of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2008;6:487–502. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.6.0.487-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kathirvel P, Joy P, Luhovyy BL. Food and nutraceutical applications of chinese herbal products. Diet Chinese Herbs. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99448-1_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bibi T, et al. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in district Mastung of Balochistan province-Pakistan. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;157:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.08.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trichopoulou A, Soukara S, Vasilopoulou E. Traditional foods: a science and society perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(8):420–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lwoga ET, Ngulube P, Stilwell C. Managing indigenous knowledge for sustainable agricultural development in developing countries: knowledge management approaches in the social context. Int Inf Libr Rev. 2010;42(3):174–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IILR.2010.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz MA, Abbasi AM, Ullah Z, Pieroni A. Shared but threatened: the heritage of wild food plant gathering among different linguistic and religious groups in the Ishkoman and Yasin Valleys, North Pakistan. Foods. 2020;9(5):601. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pieroni A, Sõukand R. Are borders more important than geographical distance? The wild food ethnobotany of the Boykos and its overlap with that of the Bukovinian Hutsuls in Western Ukraine. J Ethnobiol. 2017;37(2):326–45. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-37.2.326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liljegren H, Khan AA. Illustrations of the IPA: Khowar. J Int Phon Assoc. 2017;47(2):219–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100316000220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Janjua F. Causes of decline of Yadgha language. Can Soc Sci. 2011;7(2):249–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torwali Z. “Countering the challenges of globalization faced by endangered languages of North Pakistan. Lang Doc Descr. 2020;17(17):44–65. https://doi.org/10.25894/LDD96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nathan D, Austin PK, Holton G. Language documentation and description mediating language documentation. Lang Doc Descr. 2014;2:140–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liljegren H, Svärd E. “Bisyndetic contrast marking in the Hindukush: additional evidence of a historical contact zone. J Lang Contact. 2017;10(3):450–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01002010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Medeiros PM, de Almeida ALS, de Lucena RFP, Souto FJB, Albuquerque UP. Use of Visual Stimuli in Ethnobiological Research. In: Lucena R, Albuquerque UP, de Cruz Cunha AR, editors. Methods and techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. New York: Humana Press; 2014. p. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilmore MP, Young JC. The use of participatory mapping in ethnobiological research, biocultural conservation, and community empowerment: a case study from the Peruvian Amazon. J Ethnobiol. 2012;32(1):6–29. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-32.1.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kufer J, Heinrich M, Förther H, Pöll E. Historical and modern medicinal plant uses—the example of the Ch’orti‘ Maya and Ladinos in Eastern Guatemala. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;57(9):1127–52. https://doi.org/10.1211/jpp.57.9.0008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Collins S, Martins X, Mitchell A, Teshome A, Arnason JT. Quantitative ethnobotany of two East Timorese cultures. Econ Bot. 2006;60(4):347–61. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[347:QEOTET]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, McMillen H. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. In: Economic Botany, vol 71(3). New York: Springer; 2017. p. 269–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Vijayakumar S, Morvin Yabesh JE, Prabhu S, Manikandan R, Muralidharan B. Quantitative ethnomedicinal study of plants used in the Nelliyampathy hills of Kerala India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;161:238–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.12.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitney CW, Bahati J, Gebauer J. Ethnobotany and agrobiodiversity: valuation of plants in the homegardens of southwestern Uganda. Ethnobiol Lett. 2018;9(2):90–100. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman B, Gallaher T. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007;5(1):201–18. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.201-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. González-Tejero MR, et al. Medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: synthesis of the results of the project Rubia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116(2):341–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sultan S, Jan R, Baig M. Exploring midwives’ challenges and strategies to provide care in maternity settings during harsh winter weather in northern areas, Pakistan: a qualitative study protocol. J Asian Midwives. 2023;10(2):42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hameed I, Dastagir G, Hussain F. Nutritional and elemental analyses of some selected medicinal plants of the family polygonaceae. Pak J Bot. 2008;40(6):2493–502.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Akgul A, Akgul A, Senol SG, Yildirim H, Secmen O, Dogan Y. An ethnobotanical study in Midyat (Turkey), a city on the silk road where cultures meet. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0201-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rehman S, Iqbal Z, Qureshi R, Shah GM. Quantitative ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the indigenous communities of Shawal Valley, District North Waziristan, Pakistan. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2023;25:1–24. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.248.5.1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khanum R, Ahmed A. Educating local people for nature protection especially with reference to endemic plants in Chitral-Pakistan (a case study). Ecol Quest. 2019;30(2):31–7. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2019.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kakakhel SFB. A Review on Markhor (Capra falconeri falconeri Wagner 1839) population trends (2016–2019) and community-based conservation in Toshi Shasha, Gehrait Goleen, Kaigah Kohistan Conservancies and Chitral Gol National Park, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Am J Nat Sci. 2020;3(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajns.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan S, Shaheen H, Mehmood A, Nasar S, Khan T. Ethnobotanical and antibacterial study of Primula plants traditionally used in the indigenous communities of Western Himalaya, Pakistan. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(5):3244–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.048.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Shoaib G, et al. Traditional practices of the ethnoveterinary plants in the Kaghan Valley, Western Himalayas-Pakistan. Rev Biol Trop. 2021;69(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.15517/RBT.V69I1.42021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Arshad M, Qamer FM, Saleem R, Malik RN. Prediction of Kashmir markhor habitat suitability in Chitral Gol National Park, Pakistan. Biodiversity. 2012;13(2):78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2012.684206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shah SA. Conservation of endangered species in Khyber Paktun Khwan. J Anim Plant Sci. 2011;21(2):400–4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shehzad K, Qamer FM, Murthy MSR, Abbas S, Bhatta LD. Deforestation trends and spatial modelling of its drivers in the dry temperate forests of northern Pakistan—a case study of Chitral. J Mt Sci. 2014;11(5):1192–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2932-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sõukand R, et al. Multi-functionality of the few: current and past uses of wild plants for food and healing in Liubań region, Belarus. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13002-017-0139-X.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Khan K, et al. Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants amongst the tribal populations of District Malakand, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2023;25(5):1–24. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.25.42.1-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hussain A, Abidi S, Syed Q, Saeed A, Un-nisa A. Current knowledge on ethnobotany, phytochemistry and biological activities of Cannabis (hemp) from Pakistan with emphasis on its legalization and regulation. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2022;23:1–33. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.23.40.1-33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Aziz MA, Khan AH, Pieroni A. Ethnoveterinary plants of Pakistan: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13002-020-00369-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Abbasi AM, Khan SM, Ahmad M, Khan MA, Quave CL, Pieroni A. Botanical ethnoveterinary therapies in three districts of the Lesser Himalayas of Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. UlHassan H, Murad W, Tariq A, Ahmad A. Ethnoveterinary study of medicinal plants in Malakand Valley, District Dir (Lower), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Ir Vet J. 2014;67(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-67-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mishra A, Swamy SL, Thakur TK, Bhat R, Bijalwan A, Kumar A. Use of wild edible plants: can they meet the dietary and nutritional needs of indigenous communities in central India. Foods. 2021;10(7):1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/FOODS10071453/S1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ullah H, Badshah L. Nutritional and mineral analysis of the ultimate wild food plants of Lotkuh, Chitral, the Eastern Hindukush Pakistan. Heliyon. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Geng Y, Hu G, Ranjitkar S, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y. The implications of ritual practices and ritual plant uses on nature conservation: a case study among the Naxi in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13002-017-0186-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Qasim S, Qasim M, Shrestha RP, Hassan A. The role of religious beliefs in the conservation of biodiversity in the holy shrines of Pakistan. Biodiversity. 2022;23(3–4):159–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2022.2150312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Marsden M. Muslim village intellectuals: the life of the mind in northern Pakistan. Anthropol Today. 2005;21(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-540x.2005.00324.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Farooq A, Ijaz M. A cognitive linguistic approach to metaphor in Pakistani English. Cosm J Linguist. 2022;1(1):15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ali I, Shah I, Samad A, Zahir M, Young R. Heritage and archaeology in Chitral, Pakistan: exploring some local views and issues. Int J Herit Stud. 2013;19(1):78–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.643909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Achakzai K, Firdous S, Bibi A, Khalid S. Juniper (Juniperus excelsa M. BIEB) forest of Ziarat in danger of vanishing: a review Sardar Bahudar Khan Women ’ s University, Quetta, Pakistan. Am J Agric Environ Sci. 2016;16(2):320–5. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2016.16.2.12860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Muhammad N, Castillejo MÁ, Rey MD, Jorrín-Novo JV. An overview of oak species in Pakistan: past, present, and future research perspectives. Forests. 2023;14(4):777. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ali K, et al. The ethnobotanical domain of the Swat Valley, Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0237-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(11):1859–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00181-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ralte L, Sailo H, Singh YT. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by the indigenous community of the western region of Mizoram, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2024;20(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00642-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Suwardi AB, Navia ZI, Harmawan T, Syamsuardi, Mukhtar E. Wild edible fruits generate substantial income for local people of the gunung leuser national park, aceh tamiang region. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2020;20(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.20.11.1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kumar M, et al. Implementation of the use of ethnomedicinal plants for curing diseases in the Indian Himalayas and its role in sustainability of livelihoods and socioeconomic development. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tahir M, Asnake H, Beyene T, Van Damme P, Mohammed A. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Asagirt District, Northeastern Ethiopia. Trop Med Health. 2023;51(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00493-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Harun N, Chaudhry AS, Shaheen S, Ullah K, Khan F. Ethnobotanical studies of fodder grass resources for ruminant animals, based on the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities in Central Punjab Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0184-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Bruschi P, Urso V, Solazzo D, Tonini M, Signorini MA. Traditional knowledge on ethno-veterinary and fodder plants in South Angola: an ethnobotanic field survey in Mopane woodlands in Bibala, Namibe province. J Agric Environ Int Dev. 2017;111(1):105–21. https://doi.org/10.12895/jaeid.2017111.559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ugulu I, Baslar S. The determination and fidelity level of medicinal plants used to make traditional turkish salves. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(3):313–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2009.0040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Soto-Madrid D, Gutiérrez-Cutiño M, Pozo-Martínez J, Zúñiga-López MC, Olea-Azar C, Matiacevich S. “Dependence of the ripeness stage on the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of walnut (Juglans regia L.) green husk extracts from industrial by-products. Molecules. 2021;26(10):2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Khan RU, Mehmood S, Khan SU. Toxic effect of common poisonous plants of district Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2018;31(1):57–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rosati L, Masi A, Giardini M, Marignani M. Under the shadow of a big plane tree: Why Platanus orientalis should be considered an archaeophyte in Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2015;149(1):185–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2014.998312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sun Y, Yang T, Wang C. Capparis spinosa L. as a potential source of nutrition and its health benefits in foods: A comprehensive review of its phytochemistry, bioactivities, safety, and application. Food Chem. 2023;409: 135258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Hussain A, Qamar FM, Adhikari L, Hunzai AI, Rehman AU, Bano K. Climate change, mountain food systems, and emerging opportunities: a study from the Hindu Kush Karakoram Pamir Landscape, Pakistan. Sustain. 2021;13(6):3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13063057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rasul G, Hussain A. Sustainable food security in the mountains of Pakistan: towards a policy framework. Ecol Food Nutr. 2015;54(6):625–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2015.1052426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Khan AH, Adil M, Aziz MA, Sõukand R, Pieroni A. Traditional foraging for ecological transition? Wild food ethnobotany among three ethnic groups in the highlands of the eastern Hindukush, North Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2023;19(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00581-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Aziz MA, Ullah Z, Pieroni A. Wild food plant gathering among Kalasha, Yidgha, Nuristani and Khowar Speakers in Chitral, NW Pakistan. Sustain. 2020;12(21):9176. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12219176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ahmad L, et al. An ethnobotanical survey of wild food plants used by the local communities of Kumrat Valley in District Upper Dir, Pakistan. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2021;22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.22.20.1-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Khan S, et al. Overcoming tribal boundaries: the biocultural heritage of foraging and cooking wild vegetables among four pathan groups in the Gadoon Valley, NW Pakistan. Biol. 2021;10(6):537. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOLOGY10060537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Asif M, Nawaz K, Zaheer Z, Thygesen H, AbuShaheen A, Riaz M. Seasonality of deaths with respect to age and cause in Chitral District Pakistan. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12): e0225994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Jan HA, Jan S, Bussmann RW, Wali S, Sisto F, Ahmad L. Complementary and alternative medicine research, prospects and limitations in Pakistan: a literature review. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020;40(6):451–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHNAES.2019.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. World Health Organisation. Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary/alternative medicine: a worldwide review. Essent. Med. Heal. Prod. Inf. Portal A World Heal. Organ. Resour., p. 200, 2001. Mar. 26, 2024. [Online]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42452/WHO_EDM_TRM_2001.2_eng.pdf

  77. Shinwari ZK. Medicinal plants research in Pakistan. J Med Plants Res. 2010;4(3):161–76.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Pei S, Alan H, Wang Y. Vital roles for ethnobotany in conservation and sustainable development. Plant Diversity. 2020;42(6):399–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Kamal M, et al. Anti-rheumatic potential of pakistani medicinal plants: a review. Pak J Bot. 2016;48(1):399–413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ahmad S, Islam M, Mirza SN. Rangeland degradation and management approaches in Balochistan, Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 2012;44(2):127–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper constitutes an integral part of the doctoral research conducted by the principal author. We extend our gratitude for the support received from the Phytoecology Lab, Department of Botany, University of Peshawar, Pakistan. Sincere thanks are extended to the people of Lotkuh, for their steadfast support and warm hospitality.

Funding

The research has not received funding from any agency or organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hafiz Ullah helped in field survey, data collection, plant sample collection, manuscript writing. Lal Badshah contributed to research design, data analysis, review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafiz Ullah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All individual participants included in the study provided informed consent. Their voluntary participation was expressed, and they were aware of the purpose of the study.

Consent for publication

The authors consent to the publication of the data presented in the research article. The photograph featuring a human subject in the figure is that of the principal author, captured during field data collection.

Competing interests

The authors unanimously declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, H., Badshah, L. The ethnobotanical heritage of Lotkuh, a high-altitude tribal haven of Chitral, the Eastern Hindu Kush, Pakistan. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 20, 54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00687-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00687-8

Keywords