Skip to main content

An ethnobotanical survey on the medicinal and edible plants used by the Daur people in China

Abstract

Background

The Daur people are one of the 55 minority ethnic groups in China and have lived in Northern China for 300 years. In traditional Daur medicine, medicinal and edible plants (MEPs) are utilised for health benefits and therapeutic purposes; however, related ethnobotanical knowledge is rarely reported, which is disadvantageous for the sustainable development of these MEPs.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 122 informants, six focus group discussions, and a resource survey were conducted in a Daur minority nationality area in Inner Mongolia from 2015 to 2020, and the data statistics were analysed. In this study, we simulated a system dynamics model aimed at understanding the multiple feedback mechanisms involved in the relationships between the cultural influences and socioeconomic factors, sustainable environment, and development of MEPs.

Results

A total of 52 species of MEPs were identified and relevant ethnobotanical knowledge was assessed using Daur medicinal species data from Inner Mongolia and the Xinjiang region, with the literature and Ewenki ethnic group data used for comparison. The most commonly used medicinal plant species by the Daur were found to be Betula pendula subsp. mandshurica, Artemisia integrifolia, Crataegus pinnatifida, Saposhnikovia divaricata, Artemisia argyi, and Jacobaea cannabifolia. The MEPs most frequently targeted the digestive and rheumatic immunity systems, as well as infectious diseases or parasitic infections and other common diseases and basic health issues. MEP knowledge was primarily limited to older generations; thus, the valuable ethnobotanical knowledge on traditional medicines must be protected from future losses.

Conclusions

Our findings provide insights for future research aimed at exploiting the rich phytochemical diversity in traditional medicine and promote its use in modern lifestyles. Effective assessment and management of plant resources will lead to their application for the improvement of dietary diversity, nutrition, and health care.

Background

Owing to their considerable biological diversity and wide array of phytochemicals, edible plants have been an essential source of food and medicine for millennia [1, 2]. The recognition of the benefits of a plant-based diet as part of a holistic healthcare solution has gradually increased. However, the domestication of plants has led to a reduced crop diversity and a gradual shift from high to low phytochemistry [3, 4]. Health maintenance of the general population through promoting the consumption of a greater variety of nutritional plants is a significant challenge. Unlike modern medicines, traditional medicinal plants have previously been used in ways that resemble dietary interventions, with characteristics such as a complex material basis, long-term preference, and high nutritional security, in many nations and regions. Dietary interventions with medicinal plants and their derived products have been studied for many diseases, such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and obesity [5,6,7]. The scaling of traditional medicinal plant usage will depend on the vast population knowledge, acknowledgement of safety concerns, and effectiveness of the prolonged use for diverse dietary needs [8,9,10].

China is one of the most biodiverse countries in the world, particularly in terms of medicinal plants [11, 12]. According to previous reports [13], 7736 species of traditional medicinal plants have been utilised by ethnic minorities in China, reflecting the diverse food, culture, distribution, and development of these different ethnic groups [14]. The Daur ethnic group is one of many minorities with ethnobotanical knowledge. Most Daur people moved to Inner Mongolia owing to war, but a small population lives in Heilongjiang and Xinjiang [15]. The Daur people have their own language but no exclusive script. Shamanism was the main religious practice of the Daur ethnic group, influencing their worldview and customs in the past, but it has almost disappeared [16]. For a long time, the Daur people have depended on wild medicinal and edible plants (MEPs) to ensure their nutritional security and reduce livelihood risks. These MEPs are a potential treasure trove of medicines and health products that are yet to be developed. However, gradual changes in the ecological environment and socioeconomic development have caused the addition and disappearance of many MEP species [17]. Therefore, it is important to catalogue knowledge of the Daur ethnic group on MEPs to conduct in-depth research that will help understand the relationships between MEPs, cultural diversity, ecological environment deterioration, and socioeconomic changes.

The urgent need for Daur medicinal plant research has been increasingly recognised by the scientific community; however, only a small proportion of available medicinal plant records describe foods used for health care. In the twentieth century, Guo et al. [18] were the first to survey the use of 14 plant medicines and 16 animal medicines by the Daur as ethnic medicines. Additionally, a study by Liu et al. [17] recorded 31 varieties of medicines, including products and materials from both plants and animals. Subsequently, Zhang et al. [19] summarised records from previous studies and laid a theoretical foundation for further investigation of medicinal plants used by the Daur ethnic group. These studies have directly documented traditional medicinal plant applications; however, no studies have investigated their mechanisms of action or inheritance. Furthermore, changes in socioeconomic, cultural, and ecological resources have affected the potential use of MEPs used by the Daur ethnic group. In this study, we aimed to: (i) investigate MEPs used by the Daur ethnic group; (ii) explore the variations in MEPs among regions inhabited by the same Daur ethnic group and the differences in MEP use between the Daur and other ethnic groups within the same region; and (iii) evaluate the effects of sustainable resources, culture, and socioeconomic factors on MEP development.

Methods

Study area

The Daur group consists of a population of 132,299 according to the Seventh Population Census, of which approximately half live in Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia [20] within the Ewenki Autonomous Banner, Arun Banner, Zhalantun City, and Molidawar Daur Autonomous Banner [19] (Fig. 1b, Table S1). The majority of the Daur people live in the Greater Khingan Mountains within the central and eastern regions, which are predominantly located in temperate continental monsoon zones and some in cold temperate zones. Climatic characteristics of the region include long, cold winters and short, cool summers, in addition to an abundance of sunshine and little precipitation, mostly occurring between July and August. The area comprises various biome types, such as mountains, grasslands, and plateaus. In addition to the Daur ethnic group, these areas support a range of minorities, including the Mongolian [21], Ewenki [22], and other ethnic groups. The region investigated in the present study has varied topography, highly diversified flora, multiple ethnic groups, and a rich cultural diversity [20, 23].

A group of Daur people moved westward and defended their territory during the war in the late eighteenth century; these people are now distributed around Tacheng City in Xinjiang Province (Fig. 1a). The Daur and 29 other ethnic groups, including Uyghur, Kazakh, and Mongolian populations, became allies and built a new homeland. Currently, approximately 3% of the Daur population lives in Tacheng (Table S1). The ethnic gathering area is located in the Tae Basin, where resources and the environment differ greatly from those in the Daur ethnic region in Inner Mongolia. To explore the development and cultural history of Daur national medicine, we conducted a semi-structured survey among Daur healers in Inner Mongolia and the Xinjiang region and compared medicinal information. However, the information obtained in Xinjiang, especially regarding the use and dosage of MEPs, was limited and incomplete. Therefore, we did not include the Xinjiang data in our main investigation and analyses and used this information only for comparative analysis of regional differences.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area map showing the Daur minority nationality area in Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang. (a Vegetation types in the Tacheng City of Xinjiang, b Vegetation types in the Ewenki Autonomous Banner, Arun Banner, Zhalantun City, and Molidawar Daur Autonomous Banner of Inner Mongolia)

Data collection

Resource survey and sample collection

A team consisting of ethnobotanists, taxonomists, and Daur individuals conducted the resource surveys and sample collection. We used a combination of sample area and transect surveys to allow documentation of a wide statistical species distribution within the Daur minority nationality area in Inner Mongolia from 2015 to 2020. We did not conduct resource surveys and collections in the Xinjiang region owing to the limited information collected locally on medicinal plant uses, as most species are cultivated for food.

Field investigations involved collecting various MEPs (Fig. 2), recording their habitat and location information, and taking reference photographs. Additional information on the abundance and distribution of MEPs in the study area was collected. Fieldwork was highly beneficial for the assessment and appreciation of the rich inheritance of MEP knowledge and the diversity of ethnic culture. The family and scientific names of voucher specimens were confirmed using the Plant List database (www.worldfloraonline.org). Voucher specimens of plants were prepared and deposited at the Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University, China.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Parts of plants used in Daur medicine at study area (a. Panax ginseng C. A. Mey., b. Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, c. Sorbaria sorbifolia (L.) A.Braun, d. Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton, e. Rosa davurica Pall., f. Cicuta virosa L., g. Cucumis sativus L., h. Rhododendron dauricum L., i. Jacobaea cannabifolia (Less.) E. Wiebe, j. Corylus heterophylla Fisch. ex Trautv., k. Actaea dahurica (Turcz. ex Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Franch.., l. Xanthium strumarium L., m. Sambucus williamsii Hance, n. Pulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regel, o. Filifolium sibiricum (L.) Kitam., p. Aconitum kusnezoffii Rchb.)

Data collection for frequently used MEPs

The data were collected from the following two types of sources: 1) interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations in the study areas and 2) publications and reviews relevant to the present study [24]. A research team conducted semi-structured interviews with 122 informants (including healers, ethnic medicine gatherers, and local villagers) using preprepared questions (Table S3). The study employed 98 questionnaires that were used to collect various types of data. Local traditional medicine practitioners, such as experts and advisors on traditional MEP knowledge and application, provided basic information on ethnomedicine and views on the development status of MEPs, whereas villagers described the effects of MEPs as part of disease treatments and the efficacy of their daily consumption.

The data collection team paid particular attention to the choice of language spoken in the interviews, noting the use of the Chinese, Mongolian, and Daur languages by the interviewees. Prior to the interviews, we obtained oral consent from the interviewees that the information provided could be made public. Those who were expected to have extensive knowledge of plants used for food and medicine were selected with the help of the corresponding village committees. Six focus group discussions were conducted in the Daur Autonomous Township, during which healers, ethnic medicine gatherers, and local village committees helped facilitate an understanding of the current situation regarding MEPs among the Daur. This information included the plant resource, daily food consumption, disease treated, ethnic culture, and other relevant information.

Data analysis

Expression correlation network

Topological relationships among MEPs, their health benefits and therapeutic uses, and attending disease classifications were analysed using the Cytoscape 3.9.1 software (https://cytoscape.org/) to obtain key factors and visualise the network [25]. Then, using the plug-in ‘cytoNCA’, we analysed the hub targets, which had a high betweenness centrality value, and chose the top five targets for each MEP, health benefits, therapeutic uses, and body system classification as hub nodes.

Informant consensus factor

The informant consensus factor (ICF) represents the general use of plants; it is calculated using the following formula:

$${\text{ICF}} = \, \left( {{\text{N}}_{{{\text{ur}}}} - \, N_{t} } \right) \, / \, \left( {{\text{N}}_{{{\text{ur}}}} - \, 1} \right),$$

where Nur refers to the number of use reports for a particular disease category and Nt refers to the number of taxa used for a particular use category by all informants. Low ICF values (close to 0) are obtained if medicinal resources are chosen randomly or if there is no exchange of information about their use among informants. High ICF values (close to 1.0) are obtained when the informants indicate well-defined selection criteria for the species regarding a specific illness category or if the informants are in full agreement regarding the use of a certain species for a specific use [26]. Higher ICF values indicate a stronger agreement among information providers as to which medicinal plants are used in traditional therapies for a particular health issue.

Use value (UV) for individual species

The UV—a quantitative measure of the relative importance [27,28,29]—was calculated for all species in the study area using the following formula:

$${\text{UV }} = \, \sum {\text{U}}_{{\text{i}}} /{\text{N}},$$

where \(\sum {\text{U}}_{{\text{i}}}\) is the total number of use reports cited by each informant for a given MEP and N represents the total number of informants. Low UVs (close to 0) indicated few reports related to use, and higher UVs indicated a higher number of reports of MEP use, thus implying species importance.

System dynamics (SD) model

Based on the influence of sustainable resources, culture, and socioeconomic factors, the feedback and interactions between subsystems and variables in the MEP development status and the future development trend were analysed to design an SD model. Using the VENSIM software as a modelling tool, a qualitative SD simulation was performed to model the feedback relationships of effect variables to supplement qualitative information gathered from experts and the Daur [30]. The model process relied on systems thinking, that is, the ability to gain understanding by engaging in processes based on mental models [31, 32].

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants

The MEP use surveys consisted of semi-structured interviews with a total of 122 people in six focus group discussions. The study informants were divided into groups according to age as follows: < 30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, and > 60 years old. Most informants were in the 51–60 (51.6%), 41–50 (20.5%), and 31–40 (14.8%) age groups, a distribution that was representative of the main users of ethnic medicine and knowledge inheritors. Few individuals in the youngest (< 30 years old; 5.7%) and oldest (> 60 years old; 7.4%) age categories were interviewed (Table S2).

Plant biodiversity in the Daur minority area

The field survey collected data in the Ewenki Autonomous Banner, the Arun Banner, Zhalantun City, and the Molidawar Daur Autonomous Banner for several years. A total of 501 species of plants, which belonged to 87 families and 284 genera, were thoroughly studied and recorded. Asteraceae was the dominant plant family used (75 species), followed by Rosaceae (37 species), Ranunculaceae and Leguminosae (32 species each), and Lamiaceae (30 species).

Diversity of MEPs used by the Daur

In total, 52 species of commonly used MEPs from 29 families and 47 genera were identified using the UV (Table 1). Among them, Rosaceae was the dominant plant family used (seven species), followed by Asteraceae (six species), Amaryllidaceae (four species), Ranunculaceae and Lamiaceae (three species each), and Betulaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Apiaceae, Urticaceae, and Poaceae (two species each). The remaining 19 families (Salicaceae, Cannabaceae, Polygonaceae, Amaranthaceae, Grossulariaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Araliaceae, Ericaceae, Solanaceae, Plantaginaceae, Viburnaceae, Liliaceae, Asphodelaceae, Typhaceae, Fabaceae, Zingiberaceae, Brassicaceae, Rhamnaceae, and Phrymaceae) were represented by one species each. Herbs (39 species, 75%) were the commonly used MEP type, followed by trees (seven species, 13.5%) and shrubs (six species, 11.5%). In the past, most MEPs were collected from the natural environment, but now, with the increasing use of herbal medicines for different purposes, the extent of cultivation has increased, and therefore, approximately 42.3% of these MEPs can be obtained through cultivation.

Table 1 List of frequently used MEPs by the Daur in Inner Mongolia, China

Depending on the plant, various parts may be used in the treatment of diseases. According to the informants, the most commonly used parts are as follows: all parts of the plant (12 species), followed by the root and seed (10 species each); fruit (7 species); leaf (6 species); bulb, rhizome, bark, branch, flower, and seed oil (2 species each); and root nodules, leaf sheath, and tree sap (1 species each) (Fig. 3). Notably, the Daur people predominantly used easily accessible and regenerating aboveground parts of MEPs, which differs from the approach used in traditional Chinese medicine. This largely balances the use of MEPs with the conservation of natural resources.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The statistics of the used parts for MEPs of Daur ethnic group

We also collected information on the administration route, preparation, dosage, and usage of MEPs by the Daur people. According to the present study, MEPs were prepared via decocting, smashing, boiling, extracting, and burning. They were most often ingested as pills or powder or cooked with ingredients such as milk, honey, wine, vinegar, oats, sesame oil, egg white, rice bran, beans, barley, nuts, the crucian carp, or a pig stomach. Some MEPs were used externally in the form of a wash, fumigate, or wrap. Dosages were estimated for most MEPs and were dependent on the age of the patient, severity of the illness, diagnosis, and experience of the healer.

Use value

The Daur group with ethnobotanical knowledge on their application considered MEPs to be primarily suitable for single therapeutic uses or health benefits (36%), followed by two aspects (34%) and three or more aspects (30%). The quantitative UV indices revealed that the MEPs most used as medicines are B. pendula subsp. mandshurica (with a UV of 1.07), Artemisia integrifolia, Actaea dahurica, Crataegus pinnatifida, Saposhnikovia divaricata, Artemisia argyi, and Jacobaea cannabifolia (all with UVs of 1.00) and Fagopyrum esculentum, Avena sativa, and Perilla frutescens (with a UV of 0.99, 0.99, and 0.93, respectively). Many parts of these plant species, which are readily available or are typical species in the area, are used as a health food and a medicine.

Informant consensus factor

The ICF was used to identify plants of particular intercultural relevance and evaluate how homogenous the obtained information was. Overall, 11 disease categories were identified. The ICF was calculated for each disease category, and it ranged from 0.93 to 1.00. The highest ICF (1.00) was obtained for tumour, which involved one species and one use report. However, the high ICF value for this classification may be related to the low number of cases. The classification with the second highest ICF was for rheumatic immunity system problem (0.99) with 5 species and 534 use reports. The high values achieved in the study probably indicate a high degree of consensus among the informants. The classification with the third highest ICF was for skin problem (0.98) with 6 species and 305 use reports, where the use of medicinal species was random, and no consensus was reported among the informants (Table S4).

Health benefits and therapeutic uses of MEPs by the Daur

Table 1 presents MEPs utilised by the Daur for 85 therapeutic uses; these were classified into 11 groups based on the intended body system or targeted health category. The availability of the network model structure may improve our understanding of the relationships between MEPs, health benefits, therapeutic uses, and medical classification. According to the network statistics, the number of nodes was 129, the number of edges was 194, and the average node betweenness was 416 (Fig. 4). Statistically, the ‘Digestive system’ category was most frequently detected and included 22 health benefits and therapeutic uses, including those for dental disease, diarrhoea, gastric ulcer, loss of appetite, cough, dyspepsia, gaseous abdominal distention, enteritis, hepatitis, abdominal pain, dysentery, laryngeal carcinoma, rheumatism, weakness, lethargy, acute gastroenteritis, and stomach flu. Other categories included ‘Infectious or parasitic’, ‘Rheumatic immunity system’, ‘Respiratory system’, and ‘Trauma’. Treatment for rheumatism, trauma, cough, diarrhoea, and chronic nephritis were among more important health benefits and therapeutic uses. The health benefits and therapeutic use classification indicated a link between traditional MEP knowledge and modern medicine; however, the MEP knowledge of the Daur ethnic group retained its inherent characteristics. Among the uses, various common ailments (cough, constipation, diarrhoea, and trauma) and endemic diseases (rheumatism and rheumatoid arthritis) were treated with numerous therapies as part of the basic health service provision (Table 2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Network visualisation of the relationships between health benefits, therapeutic uses, body system classification and MEPs

Table 2 Top 5 nodes of MEPs, health benefits, therapeutic uses, and body system classification in the network ranked by the betweenness centrality value in “cytoNCA”

Relationship among cultural, socio-economic, and resource factors with MEPs

The SD model method considers the dynamic interactions among multiple factors and thus meets the requirements of simulation systems and can more clearly represent changing relationships. We present a model with four closely related subsystems: resources, culture, socioeconomic factors, and MEP use. Flowcharts demonstrating the relationships among and between the variables of each subsystem are shown in Fig. 6. The resources’ subsystem includes resource protection, exploitation, and overexploitation. This subsystem describes the interrelationship among various elements of sustainable resource use. The culture subsystem includes education quality. Higher education systems often negatively affect the spread of ethnic languages and religious beliefs, but promote further communication of the scientific literature. The socioeconomic subsystem includes urbanisation, large-scale farming, economic growth, and the population. This subsystem mainly describes how changes in societal norms and economic development affect the major production modes and lifestyle traits of individuals within the population. The negative ( +) and positive (-) markers associated with each arrow indicate the direction of influence of each factor on the others. The series of positive and negative causal relationships among the three subsystems and the use of MEPs form the causal feedback loops of this study.

Discussion

Regional variations in MEP knowledge in inner Mongolia and Xinjiang

There were regional differences in the MEPs used by the Daur ethnic group. Reporters from Inner Mongolia have cited a total of 52 plant species, and those from the Xinjiang region have cited 12 species (Fig. 5). Six shared species between the regions (S. divaricate, P. frutescens, Allium sativum, and A. argyi) and native (Urtica cannabina and Phryma nana) plants were cultivated. The species overlap between the Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia regions was minimal in the MEP use survey, which may be related to differences in the living environments and lack of inheritance of knowledge. In our investigation in Tacheng, we found just two elderly people who carried out traditional Daur medical practices, and they mainly used interventional therapies, such as treating concussion by tapping a rope tied to the patient's head. We gathered information on national costumes, festivals, and diets from Daur museums, but literature on the use of MEPs was scarce. The MEP use among the Daur ethnic groups in the Xinjiang region was mostly dependent on cultivated species that were readily available, including Ziziphus jujuba and Zingiber officinale used as food seasonings. An important reason for this is also the serious loss of ethnobotanical knowledge within the Daur ethnic group in Xinjiang, which greatly reduced the information collected during the investigation process.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of MEP species between regions and ethnic groups

Differences in knowledge of MEPs between the Daur and Ewenki ethnic groups

In previous studies, our team collected information on Ewenki medicine in the same region of Inner Mongolia [22, 33]. Medicinal information was collected on 38 species of MEPs, among which 13 species were common and their usage was duplicated between the ethnic groups, with similar methods and therapeutic applications. The Ewenki ethnic group utilised 25 kinds of unique medicinal plants. The Daur and Ewenki people share areas of distribution in Inner Mongolia. In addition, the two ethnic groups have historically been in close contact [34], which has led to similarities in the plant resources used and living environments between these ethnic minorities. Comparison of the investigated MEP information in relation to the Daur and Ewenki ethnic groups (Fig. 5) showed that most species were selected from local common wild or planted species. The 13 species used by both ethnic groups included U. cannabina, S. divaricata, Plantago asiatica, A. argyi, A. integrifolia, Allium fistulosum, A. sativum, Rosa davurica, Malus baccata, Z. jujuba, Setaria italica, B. pendula subsp. mandshurica, and Prunus padus. Among them, A. integrifolia was popular among the people from both minority groups and was frequently used as a medicine, in the daily diet, and during festive celebrations. However, owing to the differences in ethnic heritage, there were some significant differences in the use of MEPs between the two ethnic groups.

The data collected in this survey of MEP resources differed significantly from previous records of medicinal use in the Daur. This difference is mainly reflected in the fact that this survey is about the application of MEPs in the current living environment, rather than simply recording past use reports. In this process, it was tried to understand the changes in the application of MEPs under the influence of different ethnic groups and different regions. Thus, we observed that the medical practices of the Daur ethnic minority are related to access to resources; the species currently used are relatively easy to obtain from wild or cultivated resources, and the increased diversity of plant types can be attributed to the exchange of knowledge with different ethnic groups.

MEP resources and ecological sustainability

Our investigation in Inner Mongolia revealed that the MEPs used by the Daur communities accounted for ~ 10% of all plant resources in the minority nationality area. Owing to their distribution and habitat status, herbs are more frequently used as medicines and food than woody plants. In addition, the Daur communities have shown a preference for perennial wild plants and cultivated species over annuals for medicinal and edible use. Aerial parts, seeds, and fruits are easier to obtain than underground parts and are more palatable for both medicinal and edible use in daily life. It was evident that plant selection depended on ecological factors, empirical factual knowledge, and living habits, in addition to MEP use characteristics gained from experience.

The major regions inhabited by the Daur ethnic group are rich in natural resources. These insights into the distribution of MEPs will aid in the conservation and management of local ecosystems, biodiversity, and endangered species habitats. Currently, some studies have suggested that the climate change will affect biodiversity in certain regions at a faster rate than other factors in the coming decades [35, 36]. The ongoing climate change increases the probability of local conditions becoming warmer and wetter, consequently making the environment more hospitable to native species and suitable for cultivation of other species. Although the climate change has played a role in improving resource abundance, we identified potential negative effects of overcollection, overgrazing, and deforestation on MEP sustainability. Strengthening forest management and conservation has protected the environment in many cases, whereas access to wild MEP resources has become more limited. Connecting MEP use and resource conservation with a local policy, cultural diversity, and biodiversity is critically important for sustaining the socioecological resilience and traditional medicinal systems of indigenous people (Fig. 6). If information on MEP use can infiltrate local ethnobotanical knowledge through text and media communications, MEPs will likely be better developed and utilised.

Fig. 6
figure 6

System dynamics flowchart of MEPs exploitation

Cultural protection of Daur MEPs

The use of traditional Daur MEPs holds great cultural value, representing traditional knowledge and the utilisation of nature in Daur society. The Daur ethnic group in Inner Mongolia lives in the Greater Khingan Mountains region, where there are extensive birch forests. In historical hunting and gathering society, the Daur people used the bark of the B. pendula subsp. mandshurica to make a variety of utensils and furniture, which we now only see in museums and souvenir shops [37]. However, the formation of the B. pendula subsp. mandshurica culture had an invisible impact on people who used it, and it has a high use value. The traditional knowledge of the indigenous Daur people on the medicinal usage of plants, emphasising the deep connection between humans and nature. The Daur people regard A. integrifolia as a national cultural symbol. The Chinese name for A. integrifolia is ‘Kumule’. The ‘Kumule Festival’ was historically established to honour the significance of A. integrifolia in the survival of the Daur. In the festival, groups of Daur individuals pick willow sprouts to make traditional foods, and gather together. A. integrifolia has gradually developed into an important cultural symbol and has been recorded in many characters, promoting the spread of national culture [38]. But plants that combine cultural, medicinal, and edible attributes are still in the minority, so most people tend to be more limited in their knowledge of medicinal and edible plants.

Interviews and meetings with Daur communities revealed that Daur traditional MEP knowledge was mainly limited to herbalists and older people, with less knowledge held by younger generations. Traditional MEP knowledge is often transmitted through oral traditions and practical experience, and a reduction in carriers of this ethnobotanical knowledge could result in a diminished understanding and effective utilisation of natural resources. According to historical records, the Daur people have had a high level of education and became urbanised early [39]. As a result, their close relationships with the traditional natural environment through production modes and lifestyles, such as fishing, hunting, and animal husbandry, as well as dietary and medical aspects, have diminished or weakened. Actively recording knowledge on the traditions and uses of MEPs and properly preserving this information will be conducive to knowledge protection and inheritance. In addition, supporting the research, production, and promotion of ethnic minority medicine through government subsidies and project funding will increase the dissemination of Daur ethnic knowledge in local social applications.

Geographically related groups share MEP resources and knowledge, but the uniqueness of each group's traditions within their specific environmental and cultural contexts is preserved. When comparing regional and ethnic differences, we found that changes in any one of these elements could have imposed an unknown, unquantifiable influence on MEP use. Deeper insights into the characteristics and values of different MEPs will provide broader perspectives and support for their preservation and inheritance.

MEP resource development

The Daur ethnic group has centuries of successive experience in acquiring MEP knowledge and in MEP use. Most MEPs used by the Daur people are readily available in the local environment, in addition to many cultivated herbals that constitute a considerable part of the medicinal flora. Specifically, A. integrifolia is a well-known local wild plant species used in medicine to treat various diseases, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, and hepatitis [21]. The Daur have used this species as an important part of their food system. Previously, A. integrifolia was used to improve predominantly meat-based diets to reduce the risk of bowel cancer. The species is now considered a healthy diet staple and is used in soups and other dishes as part of daily meals [38]. P. frutescens is another well-known species among the Daur; the leaves and seed oil are included in Daur diets, in addition to the use of fruits, seeds, and seed oil in health care. One important medicinal property of P. frutescens is that its seed oil is rich in alpha-linolenic acid, which has many benefits for human health. The species has been cultivated over an area > 2000 hm2 within the Oroqen Autonomous Banner. In-depth knowledge of the traditional uses of medicinal plants can provide clues for modern drug discovery and development. Many modern drugs have origins traced back to plants used in traditional medicine, so preserving and studying these traditional uses can contribute to discovering new therapeutic approaches.

The present study revealed that future changes in traditional culture and socioeconomic environments would likely result in the loss of traditional medicine preferences, as this valuable natural asset is restricted to indigenous cultures. Globalisation and cultural exchanges can lead to conflicts between different cultures, impacting the transmission of traditional medicine. In addition, some cultures may be perceived as more modern or advanced, leading to disdain or neglect of traditional medicinal practices. Therefore, we should fully document the valuable MEP knowledge of the Daur ethnic group. An additional solution is to increase MEP use in daily edible consumption. In China, this phenomenon of decreased use of traditional medicines is gradually becoming more common among the small number of ethnic minorities who retain a large body of MEP-related knowledge but lack dispersed spoken and written languages. Advances in modern medicine have led to the widespread use of pharmaceutical therapies, which are often more accessible, standardised, and, in some cases, more effective. People are increasingly inclined to choose modern medicine over traditional practices, reducing the demand for traditional plant-based remedies. MEPs with significant health benefits and therapeutic uses should be explored in future studies, with a particular focus on their conservation, pharmacological mechanisms, and phytochemical properties. Additionally, products such as perilla seed oil, honey, and tea have been developed for nutrition and health care and are often sold as tourist souvenirs.

To address these challenges, comprehensive measures are necessary, including the promotion of cultural preservation, support for the transmission of ethnobotanical knowledge, encouragement of sustainable resource utilisation, and the establishment of an integrated healthcare system that incorporates both modern and traditional medicine. This can be achieved through policy-making, community engagement, and education.

Conclusion

With the rise of modern medicine and rapid socioeconomic development, the ethnic cultural heritage and traditional ethnic medicines, particularly discovery the use of MEPs, are gradually lost. However, if traditionally used MEPs are increasingly incorporated into modern lifestyles for daily health maintenance, this may improve dietary species diversity. To broaden the role of MEPs in daily lives of global populations, we conducted research on the MEPs used by the Daur communities of Inner Mongolia. Through interviews, focus groups, and fieldwork, we collected physical specimens and knowledge related to 52 species of MEPs that are characteristically used to remedy regional diseases and for daily health care. Identify the important species as highlighted by the ICF and UVs. We designed an SD model to show the relationships between sustainable resources, culture, and socioeconomic factors. Ethnic medicinal research is an ongoing process, during which more potent MEPs and a rich phytochemical diversity can be gradually discovered and applied in multiple settings and situations. As we increase our utilisation of wild resources to improve dietary diversity, nutrition, and health care, we must simultaneously assess and manage these resources to ensure their sustainability in accordance with the Convention on Biological Diversity and local protection strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MEP:

Medicinal and edible plant

UV:

Use value

ICF:

Informant consensus factor

SD:

System dynamics

References

  1. Karcı E, Gürbüz İ, Akaydın G, Günbatan T. Folk medicines of Bafra (Samsun-Turkey). Turkish J Biochem. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2017-0172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yao R, He C, Xiao P. ‘Food and medicine continuum’ in the East and West: Old tradition and current regulation. Chin Herb Med. 2023;15(1):6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chmed.2022.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pingali PL. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(31):12302–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912953109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sreenivasulu N, Fernie AR. Diversity: current and prospective secondary metabolites for nutrition and medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;74:164–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.11.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehrawat A, Roy R, Pore SK, Hahm E-R, Samanta SK, Singh KB, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer chemoprevention by phytochemicals from dietary and medicinal plants. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;47:147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.11.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung MK, Yue GGL, Chiu PWY, Lau CBS. A review of the effects of natural compounds, medicinal plants, and mushrooms on the gut microbiota in colitis and cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng Y, Tao H, Wang S, Xiao J, Wang Y, Su H. Dietary intervention with edible medicinal plants and derived products for prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: a compendium of time-tested strategy. J Funct Foods. 2021;81: 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2021.104463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimondo J, Miaron J, Mutai P, Njogu P. Ethnobotanical survey of food and medicinal plants of the Ilkisonko Maasai community in Kenya. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;175:463–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jokar NK, Noorhosseini SA, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA. Consumers’ acceptance of medicinal herbs: an application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;207:203–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Werdemberg dos Santos LC, Granja Arakaki D, de Pádua S, Melo E, Nascimento VA. Health Hazard assessment due to slimming medicinal plant intake. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;200(3):1442–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02732-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang ZY, Wang ZH, Zheng CY, Fang JY. Biodiversity in China’s mountains. Front Ecol Environ. 2006;4(7):347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi X, Zhang Z, Xu X, Zhang X, Zhao Z, Liu Y, et al. Threatened medicinal plants in China: distributions and conservation priorities. Biol Cons. 2017;210:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia MR, Zhang Y. Species and use of current chinese minority medicine. World Sci Technol/ Modern Tradit Chin Med Mater Med. 2015;17(7):1546–50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jia MR, Zhang Y. Dictionary of Chinese Ethnic Medicine. China Medical Science Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang TN, Xie YM. The Qing Dynasty’s rule of Hulunbuir and the formation of Daur in Hailar. J Inner Mongolia Normal Univ Philos Soc Sci. 2013;42(2):126–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding SQ. On Daur polytheism and its related values. Res relig. 2005;4:104–7. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1312.2005.04.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu RZ, Yi LT. Daur medicine: a review on the collection and study of traditional knowledge. J Med Pharm Chin Minor. 2017;23(12):1–3. https://doi.org/10.16041/j.cnki.cn15-1175.2017.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo W, Ma J, Li E. Investigation of drug use in Daur nationality. J Chin Med Mater. 1996;11:547–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Sun YH, Yi LT, Li MH. Investigation on ethnopharmacology of Daur nationality in Inner Mongolia. Mod Chin Med. 2018;20(06):642–7. https://doi.org/10.13313/j.issn.1673-4890.20171215009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Y. Analysis on the development status and characteristics of the Daur population in Inner Mongolia. Stat Inner Mongolia. 2016;03:45–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li S, Zhao Z, Aruhan LM. Mongolian medicine: From traditional practice to scientific development. Pharmacol Res. 2023;197:106977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yi LT, Bao Y. Ewenki ethnic group medicine. Beijing: Publishing House of Ancient Chinese Medical Books; 2014. p. 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yan J, Qi WL, Lu JA, Xu HM, Cao JJ, Zhong GT, et al. Flora of wild seed plants in wetlands in Hulunbuir city. Wetland Science. 2015;13(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2015.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Salim MA, Ranjitkar S, Hart R, Khan T, Ali S, Kiran C, et al. Regional trade of medicinal plants has facilitated the retention of traditional knowledge: case study in Gilgit-Baltistan Pakistan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0281-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Assenov Y, Ramírez F, Schelhorn SE, et al. Computing topological parameters of biological networks. J Bioinformatics. 2008;24(2):282–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Trotter RT, Logan MH. Informant consensus: A new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Etkin NL, editor. Plants in Indigenous Medicine and Diet: Biobehavioral Approaches. New York: Redgrave Publishing Company; 1986. p. 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Phillips O, Gentry AH. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Econ Botany. 1993;47(1):15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Issa TO, Mohamed YS, Yagi S, Ahmed RH, Najeeb TM, Makhawi AM, et al. Ethnobotanical investigation on medicinal plants in Algoz area (South Kordofan), Sudan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0230-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yao R, Heinrich M, Wei J, Xiao P. Cross-cultural ethnobotanical assembly as a new tool for understanding medicinal and culinary values-the genus Lycium as a case study. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 708518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.708518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Eberlein RL, Peterson DW. Understanding models with Vensim™. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;59(1):216–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nandalal KDW, Simonovic SP. Resolving conflicts in water sharing: A systemic approach. Water Resour Res. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003wr002172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turner B, Tidwell V, Fernald A, Rivera J, Rodriguez S, Guldan S, et al. Modeling acequia irrigation systems using system dynamics: model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analyses to investigate effects of socio-economic and biophysical feedbacks. Sustainability. 2016;8(10):1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bi YQ, Yi LT, Sun Y, Guo WF, Zhang L, Zhang CH, et al. Application and analysis of ethnic medicines in “Three Minorities” in Inner Mongolia. China J Chin Materia Med. 2019;4(15):3162–9. https://doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20190628.205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Min C. Study on the psychological connotation of cross-nations friendship in the context of inter-nations embeddedness—Based on the qualitative research of Oroqen, Ewenki and Daur. J Inner Mongolia Minzu Univ Philos Soc Sci Edition. 2023;49(01):16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arneth A, Shin Y-J, Leadley P, Rondinini C, Bukvareva E, Kolb M, et al. Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(49):30882–91. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009584117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Leonti M. The future is written: Impact of scripts on the cognition, selection, knowledge and transmission of medicinal plant use and its implications for ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;134(3):542–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu J. Study on the Birch Bark Culture of Ewenki, Qreqen. Daur: Inner Mongolia Agriculture University; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Qi D, Wang F, Jiang J. The cultural significance of “Kumule Festival” of Daur nationality and the custom of collecting Artemisia integrifolia. Culture Journal. 2024;03:25–8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chen Y, Wang Y. The value of traditional culture of less populated ethnic groups in contemporary society: the example of traditional culture of Daur, Ewenk and Oroqen in Inner Mongolia. Heilongjiang National Series. 2019;06:131–5. https://doi.org/10.16415/j.cnki.23-1021/c.2019.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the traditional healers and other local people who unselfishly shared their traditional ethnomedicine knowledge. In addition, we are thankful to the people of the village committees from the Daur minority nationality area for their help. Furthermore, we would like to extend our gratitude to the ethnobotanists, taxonomists, and Daur people who contributed their time and expertise to the surveys during the study period.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFE0190100), the Special Foundation for National Science and Technology Basic Research Program of China (No. 2018FY100702), and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (No. CARS-21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YQB participated in research survey, data evaluation, and wrote the manuscript as the major contributor of the study. FG, JXG, and XY analysed the data and provided technical support. AXW, HLL, and YHS designed the research survey and collected data. RYY and MHL contributed to the structure, discussion contents of the study, and helped with species identification. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruyu Yao or Minhui Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to conduct the ethnobotanical study was obtained from the district administration and village office in the study area. The purpose of the study was explained to all participants, and they agreed to provide information.

Consent for publication

Our manuscript does not contain any individual's person data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, Y., Gao, F., Guo, J. et al. An ethnobotanical survey on the medicinal and edible plants used by the Daur people in China. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 20, 55 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00695-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00695-8

Keywords