Skip to main content

Ethnopharmacological survey of Samburu district, Kenya



Ethnobotanical pharmacopoeia is confidently used in disease intervention and there is need for documentation and preservation of traditional medical knowledge to bolster the discovery of novel drugs. The objective of the present study was to document the indigenous medicinal plant utilization, management and their extinction threats in Samburu District, Kenya.


Field research was conducted in six divisions of Samburu District in Kenya. We randomly sampled 100 consented interviewees stratified by age, gender, occupation and level of education. We collected plant use data through semi-structured questionnaires; transect walks, oral interviews and focus groups discussions. Voucher specimens of all cited botanic species were collected and deposited at University of Nairobi's botany herbarium.


Data on plant use from the informants yielded 990 citations on 56 medicinal plant species, which are used to treat 54 different animal and human diseases including; malaria, digestive disorders, respiratory syndromes and ectoparasites.


The ethnomedicinal use of plant species was documented in the study area for treatment of both human and veterinary diseases. The local population has high ethnobotanical knowledge and has adopted sound management conservation practices. The major threatening factors reported were anthropogenic and natural. Ethnomedical documentation and sustainable plant utilization can support drug discovery efforts in developing countries.


The Samburu pastoralists of Kenya are still among the traditional communities of the country that have retained most of their knowledge about the use of a large part of the plants in their environment for a wide variety of purposes. This knowledge is however dwindling rapidly due to changes towards a more western lifestyle, overgrazing and overexploitation of plant resources have already led to a decline of the plant material available [1].

Ethnopharmacology and natural product drug discovery remains a significant hope in the improving the poor livelihoods of rural communities. Many modern pharmaceuticals have their origin in ethnomedicine and ethnoveterinary medicine, which relies upon a local pharmacopoeia [2]. The ethnopharmacology knowledge is a holistic system approach that can serve as an innovative and powerful discovery engines for newer, safer and affordable medicines [3].

High throughput screening in industries and the isolation of many have proven to be of poor cost-effectiveness due to lack of comprehensive biological and clinical evaluation [4].

Natural products from botanical sources used in traditional medicine may combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) infectious diseases through the elucidation and validation of biological compounds with novel mechanisms of action[5].

Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological studies normally involve field explorations of indigenous medical knowledge and biodiversity [6].

The cultural importance of traditional medicine and physical isolation of communities both in general and from primary health cares (PHCs), are the factors that influence the dramatic use of use herbal medicines in developing countries[7, 8].

Cultural acceptability of traditional practices, along with perceptions of affordability, safety and efficacy play a role in stimulating scientific research and validation of traditional medicines [9].

Ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) include use of medicinal plants, surgical techniques and management practices [10] which forms a basis of veterinary diseases management in Samburu District. Herbal medicines are cheap and readily available in the pastoral areas but lack of sufficient scientific data on efficacy, therapeutic index, toxic effects and other pharmacological and toxicological properties to support their use [11].

Despite the fact that EVM has been very crucial for the animal healthcares of most developing countries, it has not yet been well documented and much effort is needed in research and integration activities in these countries [12].

Interdisciplinary studies to effectively combine ethnography, medical anthropology and ethnopharmacology to formulate meaningful conclusions regarding how local healers effect cure should be encouraged [13].

There are several ethnomedicinal and ethnoveterinary studies which are being carried out realizing the benefit of traditional medication to promote the cheap and safe disease management. The outcomes of these researches have immense contribution to attitude change and adaptation, though there are very few in light of Kenya's biodiversity.

The population in the District depend on livestock products for their food source and the natural vegetation as source of fuel, medicine, construction materials and other cultural needs. The overdependence on natural vegetation as food, fuel, building and medicine in Samburu District might be the cause of the cause for the environmental. Therefore, there is a need to carry out more research pertaining to documentation of useful medicinal plants in this area before they disappear, especially those which are already endangered by natural and anthropogenic activities [1416].

In the current study we investigated and documented the local use of medicinal plants, management and extinction threats. We also compared the use of medicinal plants in treatment of human and animal diseases.

Materials and methods

Study area and ethnographic background

Samburu District is situated in the northern half of the Rift Valley Province in Kenya. It is bordered by five other Districts; Turkana (Northwest), Baringo (Southwest), Marsabit (Northeast), Isiolo (East) and Laikipia (South) respectively. It lies between Latitudes 0°40" north and 2°50" north of the equator and Longitudes 36°'20" east and 38° 10" east of the Prime Meridian (figure 1). It covers approximately 21126.5 square kilometres. It is divided into six divisions, 39 locations and 108 sub locations. It is characterised by high level plateaus, hills and the Rift valley with an altitude up to 2000 m a.s.l.

Figure 1

Map of research area. Right: Map of Kenya illustrating the geographical position of Samburu District. Left: Samburu District indicating the divisional administrative boundaries.

The study area has a bimodal rainfall distribution from April to May (long rains) and July to September (short rains). The dry season then extends from January to March. The mean annual rainfall is 500 mm. it has mean annual temperatures of 29°C. Samburus are the indigenous dominant ethnic group with Turkana and Maasai having settled in the area. Pastoralism is the major economic activity of the local people. The District has a population of approximately 156125 people[17]. These rural communities are almost totally dependent on forests and savannah as traditional/herbal medicine for their own health and livestock care.


A reconnaissance survey was made from December 2006 to January 2007 to obtain an impression on vegetation characteristics of the study area. The fieldwork was done in January, February, May and August 2007.

A total of 100 informants in figure 2 were selected purposively [18] based on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) survey with the help of local administrators. They included 14 traditional medicine practitioners (4 females and 10 males), 86 locals (Male: Female = 2:1). Information on knowledge depth of respondents was collected from local elderly people, opinion leaders and the local administrators. Similar responses obtained from the three groups were used to identify knowledgeable traditional healers. The respondents and traditional healers identified were consented to share their knowledge only for the purpose of this study [19].

Figure 2

Number of male and female informants grouped according to age category in the sample from Kirisia division in Samburu District. Aggregated data from January-February 2007(dry season) and May-August 2007(rainy season) (N = 100 Informants).

The methods used for ethnobotanical data collection were semi structured interviews, field observation, preference ranking and direct-matrix ranking according to [18, 20]. These interviews were conducted in vernacular (Samburu) translated by local field assistants, three different field trips were conducted.

Table 2 indicates relevant data collected on: age, sex, and occupation of informants as well as animal and human health indications treated, vernacular plant names, growth form, plant part used, methods of preparation, dosages, route of administration and possible contraindications. Threats to medicinal plants, conservation efforts, beliefs and indigenous knowledge transfer were also documented. These interviews were done in the field in order to avoid the probable confusions with regard to the identity of the medicinal plants [12]. The morphological characteristics, habitats and habits of medicinal plants were observed, photographed and recorded during and after the interviews. The key informants for purposes of ranking these species were selected randomly from among all informants [21].

Table 1 Plants of veterinary and medical utility in Samburu District.
Table 2 Data acquisition questionnaire for utilization and conservation of medicinal plants in Samburu district, Kenya

Geographical Positioning Systems readings were also taken at the sites where each medicinal plant was collected (GARMIN, Olathe, USA). Some of the plants were identified in the field by herbalists while most were identified at the Herbarium of University of Nairobi, Botany department using specific taxonomic keys and floras[22, 23].

Data analyses

Ethnobotanical data were entered in to Excel spreadsheet and summarized using descriptive statistics [24].

Wilcoxon's test was used to determine if there was a difference age of respondents and knowledge of medicinal plants used. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the average number of medicinal plant species reported and used by each informant, to determine if there is any significant difference between female and male practitioners with respect to the knowledge and use of medicinal plants. The Spearman rank correlation test was used to determine whether there was a significant correlation between the disease reported and the number of ethnoveterinary medicinal plant species used by each informant for management of the disease. STATA 9.2 IE (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) software was used.

Results and discussion

Medicinal plants diversity and Ethnobotanical knowledge

There was a highly significant difference between age of respondents and knowledge of medicinal plants (Wilcoxon's test, p < 0.001). The average number of medicinal plants known and used by female and male practitioners was similar (χ2 = 8.262, d.f. = 13, p = 0.932). It was observed that informants between 58 and 77 years old mentioned more species than younger informants: 58–67 years old: about 10 per informant; 48–57: about 6; 38–47: about 5; and 28–37: 2 quoted plants, due to larger experience of older individuals. These results also agree with other previous studies[25]. It was observed that some plants had more than one vernacular name due to use of the Maasai and Turkana dialects in the area.

Diseases treated in the study area

A total of 28 animal and 26 human ailments were reported by the informants respectively. The frequency of the most cited ailments and the number of medicinal plant species used are also given in figure 3. The most frequently cited animal health problems were; Retained afterbirth (9), Ectoparasites (8), gastrointestinal disorders (5), Theileriosis (4) and helminthosis (3). Human ailments treated cited frequently included; Malaria (18), gastrointestinal disorders (10), helminthosis (5) and rheumatism (4). Respondents had good knowledge and remote diagnosis of the disease and could readily distinguish them on the basis of accepted signs and symptoms. Ailments such as convulsions, hypertension, asthma, yellow fever and infertility were beyond the scope of the present study, it was considered important to record plants that were frequently mentioned for the treatment of such health conditions (see table 1).

Figure 3

Frequency citation (n = 990) of therapeutic indications of plant remedies based on informants knowledge (n = 100) and traditional healers (n = 14).

Ticks (lntunturi) were the main cattle ectoparasites that the local people controlled using traditional plant extracts. The most frequently used plants for tick control were found to be: Acokanthera schimperi (Lmorijoi), Adenium obesum (Lperantai), Aloe secundiflora (Sukuroi),Psiadia punctulata (Labaai),Nicotiana tabacam (Lkumbao), Euphorbia herechroma (Lpara) represented in table 1.

The respondents classified all intestinal worms under one local name, ntubui and therefore use the same plant extracts for all helminths. The main species used for this were: seeds of Myrsine africana L (Seketet) (45%), Albizia anthelmintica (Lmungutan) (30%) and Warburgia ugandensis (Sokorioi) (18%).

Medicinal plants used by the locals

Fifty four (54) plant species of ethnopharmacological importance were gathered and documented throughout the study period (table 1). These medicinal plants were distributed among 50 genera and 33 families. Analysis of the growth forms of these medicinal plants revealed that, shrubs constituted the largest number or proportion with 31 species (56%), followed by trees 15 (28 %), herbs 5 (9%) and lianas 4 (7%) respectively shown in figure 4. Ethnobotanical knowledge was passed on by word of mouth. Knowledge of ailments such epilepsy, hypertension, venereal diseases, impotence, was generally restricted to the elders and traditional medicine practitioners represented in figure 5.

Figure 4

Percentage distribution of the habit growth forms of medicinal plants.

Figure 5

Lewaso Aplea (66 years), The most revered and knowledgeable of the remaining traditional healers in Samburu District displaying, Ximenia caffra Sond.(Ledat) and Myrsine africana L.(Seketet) during the field collection.

Leaves were the most frequently used plant parts constituting 4 %, followed by roots (3 0%), stems (10%), fruit/seeds (8%) and whole plant (4%) in figure 6. The majority of informants (42%) mentioned Myrsine africana L. (Seketet) as medicinal for the treatment of various animal and human ailments.Seketet was thus the most popular remedy in the study area, followed by Carissa edulis F. (Lamuriai) (5%), Salvadora persica L. (Sekotei) (30%), Albizia anthelmintica Brongn. (Lmungutan) (27%) and Clerodendrum myricoides Hochst. (Lmakutikuti) (22%).

Figure 6

Percentage distribution of Plant parts used in Samburu District.

The number of species frequently used in each family was cited as; Apocynaceae (6), Mimosaceae (5), Euphorbiaceae and Rhamnaceae (4) and Asteraceae (2) other families were represented by at most one species shown in figure 7.

Figure 7

Species frequency of major plant families used in Samburu District.

The preparation of the medicines employed several methods; hot decoction (48%) followed by cold decoction (19.4%) and homogenization by pounding or powdering (6.5%) respectively in (table 1). The majority of these preparations were drawn from mixtures of different plant species for the treatment of a single ailment. Oral administration (8%) was the predominant route of administration followed by dermal and nasal administrations (20%).

Medicinal plants extinction threats

Many medicinal plants in the study area were mainly threatened by anthropogenic and natural factors. The majority of medicinal plants declined due to deforestation for construction, tools, firewood, fodder, agricultural expansion and ceremonial purposes. Drought, overgrazing, bush fires had reportedly affected a significant number of medicinal plant species.

Conservation efforts and indigenous knowledge transfer

About 47% of the informants had sufficient awareness in conserving some medicinal plant species that were relatively scarce in their surroundings. In situ protection of plants (fencing plants in their natural habitat, refraining from excessive cutting, debarking and uprooting and protection from fire) and ex situ conservation by cultivation of some plants as live fence and in nurseries were undertaken by the locals. Moreover, some of them were keen to inform responsible bodies or authorities of any illegal logging, deforestation and bush fires.

Majority of local healers preferred to collect medicinal plants solely to preserve their secrecy sometimes accompanied by the chosen family member(s). The ethnobotanical knowledge is transferred to that trustworthy family member by word of mouth rather than through a well organized written script [23]. Some of the ethnopractitioners were reluctant to pass on their plant use knowledge even to their families leading to the fragmentation and loss of the indigenous knowledge system and eventually medicinal plants [12].

This study revealed that traditional medical healers and pastoralists in Samburu District had sound knowledge of traditional medicine, from whom about 54 indications (animal and human) and a total of 56 medicinal plants of importance were recorded.

The continued reliance of Samburus' on traditional medicines is due to economic circumstances, which place modern health facilities, services and pharmaceuticals out of the reach of the majority of the population. It is also attributable to the widespread belief in the effectiveness of many traditional therapies [27].

The current investigation indicates that leaves are the most collected plant parts for medicinal purposes and this situation could be a severe threat to some rare and slowly reproducing medicinal plants. The practice of exploiting perennial plant parts, such as roots of relatively slow growing woody species, can result in a decline in both, the size and distributions of populations of the exploited species, and ultimately result in the local extinction of these populations [28].

The use of plants is evenly distributed for management of both medical and veterinary conditions this finding was contrary to earlier findings in the same geographical zone which reported insignificant veterinary use [1].

The majority of plant preparations were drawn from mixtures of different plant species for the treatment of a single ailment and similar results had reported elsewhere [26]. This was contrary to the findings of other researchers in other countries where most of the remedies were prepared from a single species [29]. This could also be ascribed to the differences in the socio cultural landscapes, indigenous knowledge on synergetic effect of different medicinal plants and vegetation types in the current study area [29].

The most frequently used methods of preparation were hot decoctions, cold decoctions, powdering and grinding respectively. The prepared medicines were mainly administered through oral (98%), dermal (1.5%), and nasal (0.5%), routes concurring with the previous findings in Ethiopia [30].

The measurements used to determine the dosages were not standardized and depended on the age and physical appearance of the patient, sociocultural explanation of the illness, diagnosis and experience of individual herbalist [27].

The naming of diseases by local people when compared to conventional systems, at times did not distinguish between diseases and symptoms of diseases. This is because local disease nomenclature is based on symptoms of diseases and not according to aetiological information [31, 32].

While conducting this study, some informants raised some concern on false promises about getting the feedback. They agreed that scientific methods are better in revealing harmful effects of herbs. In the drug development research and bioprospection, biological activity based on ethnomedical uses seems as a better approach compared to randomly selected plants [33]

We are currently undertaking field trials, in-vitro and in-vivo tests of these plants for antihelmintic, antiparasitic, antiplasmodial, antibacterial and cytotoxic activities to confirm the therapeutic properties claimed by informants.

Conclusions and recommendations

Indigenous knowledge, botanical diversity and ethnopharmacopoeia practices were recorded from Samburu District. The botanical resources were found to be under threat due to several anthropogenic and natural factors.

Disappearance of traditional medical skills was evident in the study area and this prompts for design of linguistic, anthropological and ethnographic methods in the context of ethnopharmacology to document the indigenous knowledge so as to minimize the eminent fragmentation and biodiversity loss.

The lack of standardized posology of the traditional medicines should encourage pharmacological and toxicological tests to develop formulations that can be administered in measurable dosages whose clinical efficacy can be monitored and pharmacovigilance mechanisms instituted to eliminate development of resistance to these novel compounds. Scientific feedback studies should be encouraged to instil confidence in the increasingly suspicious local populations to eliminate the apparent hostility observed among some the informants during the field research.

The data presented in this paper form a basis for further ethnopharmacological research in this region especially in studies dealing with efficacy, dosage, quality and toxicology. Those plants found empirically to be particularly effective can be used in preparation of commercial indigenous-based pharmaceuticals. We recommend that ethnopharmacologists project pharmacologic data against a backdrop of medical ethnography and anthropology. Relevant evidence generated from literature review and these biological tests will be passed back in order to improve the proper use of medicinal plants and create a good relationship for future ethnobotanical studies. The local community of Samburu District, Kenya is the owner of the traditional knowledge presented in this paper, consequently any benefits that may arise from the use this knowledge must be shared with them.


  1. 1.

    Bussmann RW: Ethnobotany of the Samburu of Mt. Nyiru, South Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2006, 2 (35):

  2. 2.

    Tamboura HH, Sawadogo LL, Kaboré H, Yameogo SM: Ethnoveterinary Medicine and Indigenous Pharmacopoeia of Passoré Province in Burkina Faso. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000, 916: 259-264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Patwardhan B: Ethnopharmacology and drug discovery. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005, 100: 50-52. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bertrand G, Elaine E, Jacques F: Beyond the myth of expensive clinical study: Assessment of traditional medicines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 113: 382-386. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cassandra LQ, Andrea P, Bradley CB: Dermatological remedies in the traditional pharmacopoeia of Vulture-Alto Bradano, inland southern Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008, 4 (5):

  6. 6.

    Soejarto DD, Fong HHS, Tan GT, Zhang HJ, Ma CY, Franzblau SG, Gyllenhaal C, Riley MC, Kadushin MR, Pezzuto JM, Xuan LT, Hiep NT, Hung NV, Vu BM, Loc PK, Dac LX, Binh LT, Chien NQ, Hai NV, Bich TQ, Cuong NM, Southavong B, Sydara K, Bouamanivong S, Ly HM, Tran Van Thuy Rose WC, Dietzman GR: Ethnobotany/ethnopharmacology and mass bioprospecting: Issues on intellectual property and benefit-sharing. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005, 100: 15-22. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vandebroek ICJ, De Jonckheere S, Sanca S, Semo L, Van Damme P, Van Puyvelde L, De Kimpe N: Use of medicinal plants and pharmaceuticals by indigenous communities in the Bolivian Andes and Amazon. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004, 82: 243-250.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vicente T, Omar M, Paola VF, Giovanni V, Chabaco A, Tomás Z: An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in Loja and Zamora-Chinchipe, Ecuador. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 111: 63-81. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.10.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    WHO: WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005. In promoting the role of traditional medicine in health care systems: A strategy for the African Region, WHO. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wanyama JB: 1. Confidently used ethnoveterinary knowledge among pastoralists of Samburu, Kenya: Methodology and Results. Rukangira. 1997, Nairobi: ITDG Kenya, 1: 82-1

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gathuma JM, Mbaria JM, Wanyama J, Kaburia HFAMJN, Mpoke L: Efficacy of Myrsine africana, Albizia anthelmintica and Hilderbrantia sepalosa herbal remedies against mixed natural sheep helminthosis in Samburu District, Kenya. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2004, 91: 7-12. 10.1016/j.jep.2003.11.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yinenger H, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Lukelal E: Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants at Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 112: 55-70. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Etkin NL: Perspectives in ethnopharmacology: forging a closer link between bioscience and traditional empirical knowledge. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2001, 76: 177-182. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00232-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ssegawa P, Kasenene JM: Medicinal plant diversity and uses in the Sango bay area, Southern Uganda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 113: 521-540. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vandebroek I, Thomas E, Sanca S, Van Damme P, Luc Van P, De Kimpe N: Comparison of health conditions treated with traditional and biomedical health care in a Quechua community in rural Bolivia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2008, 4 (1):

  16. 16.

    Maregesi SM, Olipa DN, Luc P, Arnold JV: Ethnopharmacological survey of the Bunda District, Tanzania: Plants used to treat infectious diseases. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 113: 457-470. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Central bureau of Statistics: 1999 Population and Housing Census, counting our people for development. 2001, Ministry of Finance and Planning, Ed.(Government of Kenya)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Martin GJ: Ethnobotany: a methods manual. 1995, London, UK: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lulekal E, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Yineger H: An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Mana Angetu District, southeastern Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2008, 4: 10-10.1186/1746-4269-4-10.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cotton CM: Ethnobotany: Principles and applications. 1996, Chichester, New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Alexiades M: Collecting ethnobotanical data. An introduction to basic and concepts and techniques, in Selected Guideline for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. Edited by: Alexiades M, Sheldon JW. 1996, The New York Botanical Garden, USA: New York, 53-94.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bamps P: Catalogue of the phanerogamic families dealt with in the main floras of Tropical Africa. Boissiera. 1976, 24: 667-686.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Polhill RM, (Ed): Flora of Tropical East Africa. Edited by: Balkema AA. 2006, Rotterdam/Boston, (Series available in parts under various dates and authors)

  24. 24.

    Höft M, Barik SK, Lykke AM: Quantitative Ethnobotany. Applications of multivariate and statistical analyses in ethnobotany. People and Plant Working Paper. 1999

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Magassouba FB, Diallo A, Kouyát M, Mara F, Mara O, Bangoura O, Camara A, Traoré S, Diallo AK, Zaoro M, Lamah K, Diallo S, Camara G, Traoré S, Kéita A, Camara MK, Barry R, Kéita S, Oulaŕ K, Barry MS, Donzo M, Camara K, Toté K, Vanden Berghe D, Totté J, Pieters L, Vlietinck AJ, Baldé AM: Ethnobotanical survey and antibacterial activity of some plants used in Guinean traditional medicine. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2007, 114: 44-53. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.07.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tabuti JRS, Dhillion SS, Lye KA: Traditional medicine in Bulamogi County, Uganda: its practitioners, users and viability. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2003, 85 (2): 119-129. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00378-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Teklehaymanot T, Giday M: Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by people in Zegie Peninsula, Northwestern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007, 3 (12):

  28. 28.

    Cunningham AB: African medicinal plants: setting priorities at the interface between conservation and primary health care. People and Plants. 1993, UNESCO : Paris

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mirutse G, Gobena A: An ethnobotanical survey of plants of veterinary importance in two woredas of southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia [abstract]. Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2003, 26 (2): 123-136.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kebu B, Ensermu K, Zemede A: Indigenous Medicinal Plant Utilization, Management and Threats in Fentalle Area, Eastern Shewa, Ethiopia [abstract]. Ethiopian Journal of Biological Science. 2002, 2 (2): 143-156.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    McCorkle M, Mathias E, Sahillhorn TM: Ethnoveterinary Research and Development. 1996, London: Intermediate Technology Development Group Publications, 338-

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jäger AK: Is traditional medicine better 25 years later. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2005, 100: 3-4. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cordell GA: Changing strategies in natural product chemistry. Phytochemistry. 1995, 40 (6): 1585-1612. 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00444-C.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The present research was funded by the Commision of Higher Education (CHE), Kenya through a research grant: CHE/1/26/1/4 (PI: J.M.Mbaria). We especially thank all of the study participants who voluntarily shared a wealth of their accumulated knowledge regarding the ethnomedical and ethnoveterinary practices of their communities and for their hospitality.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark O Nanyingi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MON carried out the field research, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, JMM and WOO designed the study, conducted fieldwork, supervised the research and revised the manuscript, CGW reviewed the manuscript and conducted the field research, KBK reviewed the manuscript and assisted in data analysis, HFK, RWM and AAL assisted in the fieldwork and taxonomic identification of the botanic specimens. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanyingi, M.O., Mbaria, J.M., Lanyasunya, A.L. et al. Ethnopharmacological survey of Samburu district, Kenya. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 4, 14 (2008).

Download citation


  • Medicinal Plant
  • Indigenous Knowledge
  • Medicinal Plant Species
  • Ethnobotanical Knowledge
  • Bush Fire