Skip to main content

Ethnophytotherapeutical research in the high Molise region (Central-Southern Italy)



In the years 2003–2005 research was carried out concerning ethno-medicine in the high Molise (central- southern Italy), a region that has been the object of very little investigation from the ethnobotanical point of view. Upper Molise is a continuation of the mountain profiles of the Abruzzi Appenines: a series of hills, steep slopes and deep fluvial valleys making communications difficult. Primordial traditions (e.g. harvest feasts) are typical of the region.


Field data were collected through open interviews in the field. These were conducted on both an individual and group level, fresh plants gathered from surrounding areas being displayed. In other cases, individual interviews were conducted by accompanying the person involved to the places where they perform their activities (for example, in the woods with woodcutters, kitchen gardens and fields with housewives, pastures with shepherds, etc.). In total 54 individuals were interviewed.


Data of 70 taxa belonging to 39 families were gathered. Among the species, 64 are used in human therapy, 5 as insect repellents, 11 in veterinary medicine, 1 to keep eggs and cheeses and 4 for magic purposes. The most important findings in ethno-medicine relate to the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. (wounds) and to some vascular plant species: Asplenium trichomanes L. and Ceterach officinarum Willd. (to regularize menstruation), Cyclamen hederifolium (chilblains), Centaurium erythraea Rafn. and Pulmonaria apennina Cristof. & Puppi (bruises), while in the ethno-veterinary field, we have Valeriana officinalis L. (wounds sustained by mules). Also worthy of note, given the isolation of the area, is the number of plants used to protect foodstuffs from parasites, among which Allium sativum L. and Capsicum frutescens L.


The research revealed a deep-rooted and widespread habit of husbanding the family's resources. Whilst isolation and snowfalls contributed to the widespread knowledge of means of conserving foodstuffs, they also led to the use of products easily available within each home. The values of E.I. (ethnobotanicity index) for the upper Molise region are considered amongst the highest in Italian areas. Nevertheless, like the values for other areas of Italy, they are lower than those of many Spanish areas, perhaps (and not only) because of the more rapid cultural erosion experienced in Italy.


The primary aim of this research activity, conducted between February 2003 and February 2005, is to provide an initial picture of the ethnobotany in the Molise region, and the only Italian area not previously studied from this viewpoint, with the exception of a brief paper by Guarrera [1]. The region does not have an autonomous regional administrative identity since it was incorporated into Abruzzo until 1963, a factor which has not helped stimulate research into its territory as an independent entity. A second reason it that, given its climatic and morphological characteristics, the area presents certain interesting elements of local isolation, which is probably one of the main reasons why there is a differentiation in the typical usages in the region . The existing ethnographic literature concerning the Molise is scarce and out of date [24], with the exception of a few works [5, 6] and mainly relates to ritual aspects and beliefs.

The area under study (Fig. 1), covering 377,76 square km, lies in the province of Isernia, in Upper Molise, in the council areas of Pietrabbondante, Chiauci, Poggio Sannita, Castiglione di Carovilli, Vastogirardi, Agnone, Pescolanciano, Pescopennataro and Capracotta, and in the province of Campobasso, in the council area of Baranello (total inhabitants: 15235) [7, 8]. The central point of the research is in the council area of Pietrabbondante, 1027 m a.s.l. and bordering on the MAB riserve of Collemeluccio. In terms of landscape and geo-morphology, Upper Molise is a continuation of the mountain profiles of the Abruzzi Appenines: a series of hills, steep slopes and deep fluvial valleys making communications difficult [9]. Rocky spurs jut out from the stony slopes favouring the establishment of settlements such as Pietrabbondante, for example. Yellowish sandy arenaceous facies and limestone seams at high altitudes are typical of the area.


Figure 1

The council areas studied present a wide variety of environments, ranging from 700 to 1400 m a.s.l. Man's exploitation of the terrain so as to create space for cereal crops has had the effect of fragmenting the terrain which is now a heterogeneous mosaic variously shaped parcels of land. The stony soil is not very suitable for cultivation; for this reason many people have emigrated. In Roman times the inhabitants of this region were shepherds and very strong warriors. The Molise region has records of this civilisation in the ruins of some towns (Bovianum Vetus, Saepinum etc). The studied area was inhabited by the ancient Sanniti Caraceni (or Carecini) and Pentri people [10, 11]. The dialects of the upper Molise region (particularly the dialect of Agnone) are similar to those of neighbouring Abruzzo, above all (but not only) in terms of phonetics. Instead the dialects of middle Molise (e.g. that of Baranello) are more closely linked to the dialects of Campania [1216]. Primordial traditions are typical of the region, e.g. harvest feasts and characteristic torches made with Abies alba L. at Christmas [17, 18].

The climate is continental given the mountain range and currents of cold air from the north and north-east during the winter, and of warm, humid air in the summer. The high altitude results in frequent and abundant snowfalls [9]. The area includes an enormous variety of vegetation (beech and fir woods, mixed groves of oaks and pastures). The MAB reserves of Collemeluccio and Montedimezzo fall into the Polysticho-Fagetum aceretosum pseudoplatani varying to Acer lobelii Ten., the Aquifolio-Fagetum fraxinetosum excelsioris, and Aquifolio-Fagetum abietetosum albae, also including Quercus cerris L. [9, 19]. The flora of the entire Molise region consists of 2422 taxa [9], while in the areas studied in this research about n. 800 taxa grow (F. Lucchese, personal communication).


Data was gathered by means of open interviews in the field, once the aims of the research had been outlined and permission obtained for publication of the data collected. The authors take full responsibility for the declaration that the people interviewed are aware that the information they have provided will be published.

A questionnaire was used in interviews, variations being introduced during the interviews themselves. These were conducted on both an individual and group level, fresh plants gathered from surrounding areas being displayed. This proved extremely efficient from the quantitative point of view, with large quantities of data being obtained, albeit sometimes circumstantial. In other cases, individual interviews were conducted by accompanying the person involved to the places where they perform their activities (for example, in the woods with woodcutters, kitchen gardens and fields with housewives, pastures with shepherds, etc.). This approach was aimed at understanding the specific knowledge of the individual in relation to his or her particular profession and environment and proved to be an extremely valid method in qualitative terms. The data thus collected often related to a smaller number of plants but furnished a greater quantity of specific information. In recording information of diseases, care was taken not to "translate" this into medical terms, but to refer exactly whatever was reported, so as to avoid the information being in any way falsified.

The plants were identified with the use of the Flora d' Italia by Pignatti [20] and its nomenclature was updated by Conti et al. [21]. Voucher herbarium specimens were kept in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Biological Sciences at the University Roma Tre (acronym URT).

A total of 54 individuals were interviewed (roughly 65% women, 35% men), most of whom were aged between 70 and 90 (max. 92, min. 40, mainly between 70 and 80, mean about 74) and mainly woodcutters, farmers and housewives. For reasons of privacy, it was possible to obtain specific complete personal data relating to only 15 informants. The data collected (see Additional file 1, Tables 1, 2) include the scientific and dialect names of the plants, the parts used, preparation, local uses, frequency of mention, eventual current usage, period in which the plant is gathered and kind of habitat in which the plant grows.

Table 1 Veterinary uses of plants in the high Molise region
Table 2 Animal, plant and mineral derivatives in folk medicine

With the aim of highlighting new pharmaco-botanical aspects, data relating to the medicinal uses of plants were compared with Italian and European pharmacobotanical and ethnobotanical reference works (Gastaldo [22]; Boni and Patri [23]); Cappelletti [24]; Bellomaria and Della Mora [25]; Guarrera [26]; Uncini Manganelli and Tomei [27, 28]; Pieroni [29]; Ballero et al. [30]; Leporatti and Corradi [31]; Pieroni et al. [32, 33]; Atzei [34]; Viegi et al. [35]; Guarrera et al. [36, 37]; Scherrer et al. [38] (and references therein); Tammaro and Xepapadakis [39]; Gonzàles-Tejero et al. [40]; Bonet et al. [41, 42]; Novaretti and Lemordant [43]; Raja et al. [44]; Vàzquez et al. [45]; Pieroni et al. [46]; Agelet and Vallès [47].

Results and Discussion

The results of our research are shown in the Additional file 1 and in Tables 1, 2. Information was collected relating to 70 taxa belonging to 39 families. In total, 64 plants are used in human therapy, 5 as insect repellent and anti-parasitical agents, 11 in veterinary medicine, 1 for preserving eggs and cheese and 4 for magical uses.

The family most frequently represented is that of the Compositae with 8 taxa. On the basis of the research conducted, it can be seen that the plants used most often (in terms of the number of people who cited them and/or the number of uses to which they are put) are: Vitis vinifera L.; Urtica dioica L. subsp. dioica; Malva sylvestris L. subsp. sylvestris; Juglans regia L.; Abies alba Miller; Allium sativum L.; Olea europaea L; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.; Triticum aestivum L.; Ficus carica L.; Matricaria chamomilla L.; Rubus ulmifolius Schott.

The most complete and exhaustive interviews were obtained from women (housewives and farmers) who listed particularly home remedies and plant medicines derived from species cultivated in kitchen-gardens and fields.

The parts of the plants most used for medicinal purposes, according to the number of citations are, in decreasing order: fruits and seeds; leaves; aerial parts; rhizomes and tubers; entire plant; bulbs; resin; flowers (including flower heads). External uses predominate over internal by about 60–40. Decoction – almost always in water – is the main method of preparation for oral administration, while poultices and direct application of the plant are the most important methods for topical use.

Nine plant preparations are administered as food-medicine.

Eighty-two uses are reported by at least three informants among medicinal practices, whilst there are 8 anti-parasitic uses.

Most pathologies treated with plants are dermatological (29%), digestive (17%), respiratory (15,5%) and renal (4,1%) illnesses.

Field data show that among the total uses, only 25% are now still practised.

Concerning the habitat, the most frequently used plants are gathered in uncultivated areas, near ruins and damp sites. A consistent number of plant species (24) are/were cultivated in kitchen-gardens and fields (some of these are also naturalized plants in the area).

Ethnobotanicity indexes

The ethnobotanicity index (E.I.) according Portères (ratio between the useful plants and the total flora, expressed as a percentage) [48] is 6 % for medicinal plants (9,75 % if referred to all the useful plants according unpublished data of the authors). This means that 6 % of the plants are known to be useful in folk medicine. Comparing this index with that of other small territories [42] (data obtained from the authors mainly with Pharmacy Degree Theses realized in Spain) we can observe that the degree of knowledge of medicinal plants (in folk medicine and veterinary science) and useful plants in the upper Molise region is lower than in the Spanish region of L'Alt Empordà (11'%), considered provisional by the authors since the area was not completely studied from the ethnobotanical point of view. The indexes of the upper Molise are similar to that of Córdoba (8.8%), but much lower than those of Les Guilleries (20%), Caurel (27.9%) and a further three Spanish territories [42]. We also compared the E.I. of the upper Molise region with that of other Italian areas (Friuli-Venezia Giulia region [49], Majella (Abruzzo) [50], Latium region [26], Acquapendente (Latium) [36, 51], Maratea (Basilicata) [37, 52, 53]) and of Italy as a whole [54]. These values were obtained by dividing the number of species cited in folk medicine and veterinary science (or in all sectors of ethnobotanical knowledge) of each area by the number of species of the respective floras [21, 55, 56]. We can note (see Table 3) that the values of E.I. in the selected Italian areas are between 3.83 % and 10,75 % (upper Molise, Acquapendente, Maratea) [36, 37, 5153]. Instead, the values for the entire country [54] are higher (from 14.24 % to 17.57 %). These Italian values of E.I. are generally lower than the corresponding ones for Spanish, perhaps due to a more rapid process of cultural erosion in Italy. Nevertheless, it appear that the indexes of the Spanish areas were calculated, according Portères, on all the plants used by the informants or at least on the plants known and for which the informants gave a name, and not only on medicinal plants (J. Vallès, personal communication). Complete folk knowledge of plants is greatly appreciated in scientific ethnobotanical research in Spain, also by pharmacobotanists, while in Italy many aspects of this research are often entrusted to the good will of single researchers.

Table 3 Ethnobotanicity indexes (E.I.) concerning vascular plants according Portères [48] for some Italian areas, compared with the E.I. of Italy [54]. References inside parentheses [x].

Medicinal uses

The predominance of external over internal uses, and of dermatological pathologies treated in folk medicine of upper Molise can be connected with the many rural activities. In fact wounds, insect bites, blisters etc. (main disturbances in skin diseases) are the most common incidents in field activities and in woodcutters' work. Within the category of skin ailments, wounds represent 48 %, whilst insect bites account for 19%. Digestive disturbances (the second category of illnesses in order of importance) are again quite important considered in the folk medicine of upper Molise, given the large quantity of plants available containing bitter substances, mucilages and essential oils useful in cases of gastritis, colitis, intestinal worms etc. Furthermore, they can be linked to the cold during bad seasons. Respiratory pathologies (the third category of illnesses represented) are connected with the very cold climate in winter.

Amongst the medicinal uses, certain practises would appear to be recorded for the first time (the active ingredients are reported above all by Anzalone [57], Gastaldo [22] and Guarrera [26]). Amongst the most important results of our research we wish to cite: Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm., thallus applied on cuts, an unreported usage. The plant contains antiseptic lichen acids [57], phenolic substances [58], hydrocarbons, sterols – among which ergosterol, episterol, fecosterol, lichesterol -, fatty acids [59, 60] and depsidones [61]; the efficacy is confirmed by its anti-ulcer and anti-inflammatory properties [58, 62]. Lichen is one of the plants that is most sensitive to the aerial pollution [63] and it indicates an uncontaminated environment. Therefore areas where this lichen grows could be the more suitable for the cultivation of medicinal plants, small wood fruits etc. L. pulmonaria was widely used as a cicatrising agent and antiseptic in the council areas of Pescolanciano, Pietrabbondante and Chiauci. The area is dominated by silver firs (on which this lichen grows) mixed with Turkey oaks and beech trees at higher altitudes. Carbon production (especially from beech) probably once represented an important resource for the villages concerned. Instead, near the council areas of Vastogirardi and Castiglione, on the other side of the mountain, the main activities were agriculture and sheep-farming. In these villages we found no trace of the use of pulmonary lichen, but the limited number of species of moss were used as cicatrising and anti-haemorrhagic agents, as well as a mushroom of the Lycoperdon genus (spores). This last rare use is reported by Lomagno and Lomagno Caramiello [64], Atzei [34], Agelet and Vallès [65].

Pulmonaria apennina Cristof. & Puppi and Centaurium erythraea Rafn

The use for bruises can be explained by their containing, respectively, mucilages and gum or wax (the use of C. erythraea is reported also by Appi and Pagnucco [66]).

Adiantum capillus-veneris L

The use for haemorrhages [32] could be due to gallic acid and tannins [22], while the mild analgesic action in labour pains would result from anti-inflammatory triterpens such as β-sitosterol, stigmasterol and campesterol [67, 68].

Asplenium trichomanes L

The plant has been reported as demulcent, expectorant and laxative [69], but also to promote menstruation [70]. Caution is nevertheless advisable, because many ferns contain carcinogens [71]. Since the species, according to Gastaldo [22], contains active compounds similar to those of A. capillus-veneris, the use for regulating menstruation [72, 73] could be due to similar sterols.

Rare uses

The emollient properties of the Abies alba L. resin for removing splinters find some confirmations [74, 75]; an anti-inflammatory use of the resin is sometimes described, e.g. in case of abscesses [42, 43, 47]. The usage of Achillea millefolium L. for toothache was only described for the Alps [76]; it can be explained by the anti-inflammatory proazulene contained in its essential oil. Very rare is the use of Sonchus oleraceus L. latex (sesquiterpene lactones, taraxasterol) for insect stings [34], but also unpublished is the same use described for Chelidonium majus L., a plant generally employed for warts, although analgesic action is attributed to the plant [77]. Moreover, the inclusion of Allium sativum L. in a variety of anti-flu decoctions is particularly interesting (in the folk knowledge no distinction is made between fever due to colds and to viruses); the antiseptic effect is known, while some antiviral properties have been recognized [78]. Other rare uses are: Saccharomyices cerevisiae Rees., thallus on abscesses (proteins, vitamins of the B group), generally antiseptic in the intestine; Cyclamen hederifolium, tuber for chilblains (saponin).

In the field of phyto-therapy, certain species may be considered as particularly representative. Concerning Malva sylvestris L. subsp. sylvestris, a proverb suggests that: a "mmàleve d'ogni mmale salve" (mallows prevents all ills), and that the name itself means "evil (or ailment) go" (it is used in a large number of preparations).

In the isolated conditions caused by long winters and heavy snowfalls, major and most frequent use was made of: oil, bread, wine and vinegar (used in the home-made treatment of many ailments). These derivative products are generally not taken into consideration by the main texts of pharmaco-botany, whilst they are reported by various ethnobotanical local works.

Triticum aestivum L

The parts of the grain used were: bran (toothache, rheumatism) and warm kernels (bronchitis, spots and boils). Small tablets were made with bread that were conserved to be used with various plants. The bread cooked in milk was used on bruises or, mixed with saliva and sugar, applied to cuts. In one case it was successfully applied to a finger to treat the initial phases of gangrene.

Vitis vinifera L

and derivatives Wine is used on cuts, to treat bronchitis by inhalation, for footbaths (this last is an uncommon use), and to cure rheumatism. Vinegar poultices were used to treat fever and high temperatures. The cooked must and green grape pulp helped in cases of severe diarrhoea.

Olea europaea L

'Olio ferrato', was prepared by heating olive oil in a frying pan, usually together with three nails: this ointment was used both in human and in veterinary medicine to cure wounds. Hot oil served for earache and to massage forearms in case of swollen glands for sore throat and fevers. Beeswax was warmed near a lamp to form an ointment applied in case of burns.

The widespread use of these derivative products typical of Mediterranean areas also testifies to the degree of simplicity and primitiveness of the folk medical culture and the essential nature of the local knowledge.

Veterinary uses

Amongst the most important veterinary uses (see Table 1) we quote: Valeriana officinalis L., a decoction of roots and leaves (new use) or oil mixed with soot for treating wounds in mules; Urtica dioica L subsp. dioica, the leaves used as fodder for turkeys suffering from rubella and an infusion applied with poultices for bruising in cattle; olive oil, clay and sugar for repairing fractures horns in cattle; stalks of burnt wheat mixed with olive oil and applied to cuts and wounds [79]. Almost all the uses in this field have nowadays been abandoned.

Food preservation and anti-parasitic uses

We wish to emphasise the widespread knowledge of the following uses, which were mentioned in almost every single interview (see Additional file 1).

Capsicum frutescens L

crumbled, dried berries were used to protect against parasites in kitchen containers, especially those containing herbs. Major and minor capsaicinoids [80] have been characterized in this plant. Atzei [34] reports the use of dried chilli peppers as a mosquito repellent; repellent properties of Capsicum extracts were described also by Nolte and Barnett [81] and Antonious et al. [82].

Allium sativum L

cloves (essential oil) placed in cases of legumes and grain as repellent.

An early use to prevent woodworm in beehives had already been recorded [50] and its use as a fly and mosquito repellent [34, 83]. Other confirmations are found in Valerio and Maroli [84] and in Bhuyan et al. [85].

Juglans regia L

the anti-parasitic use (naphtoquinone compounds) was described for other Italian regions [86].

Triticum aestivum L

kernels used in grain crates for keeping cheese and eggs fresh, for up

to six months from the onset of summer [2]. The effect could be due to a maintenance of standard temperature caused by the accumulation of the grains.

There is also an interesting comparison between the manner in which different plants are used in the same way in different regions. The plants in question are the aquiline fern (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn.) in Molise, and the black elder (Sambucus nigra L.) [87] in Abruzzo, the parts used being, respectively, the fronds and inflorescence. Both are immersed in whey and hung up in houses to attract and trap flies, the plants then being thrown out (here the plants seem to function merely as a base, the whey representing the actual "vegetable" insect-trap). A similar use in described in Abruzzo with Glycyrrhiza glabra L. [83], a plant that has sticky glands.

Beliefs and rituals

Amongst the most interesting ritual uses reports we find Clematis vitalba L., branches of which were wound 7 times around the necks of sheep which appeared to be particularly nervous (a similar use was described by Atzei [34]) and broom (Spartium junceum L.) and silver fir (Abies alba Miller) for making the characteristic torches carried during the traditional " 'ndocciata". The magical use of a sorghum broom is also described by Conti [2]. "Ferrato", or "iron" oil used to be made from olive oil usually cooked in a frying-pan with three nails: the unguent was used on both humans and animals for treating cuts, burns and earache (in these recipes the ritual use of iron was combined with the curative properties of the oil). The oil was rubbed into the forearm to cure throat inflammations, combined with beeswax it was used for treating scalds and, as a paste, for itchiness. Other medicinal uses are also connected with rituals. For example, a decoction of 3 roots of mallow, 3 of nettle and 3 of coltsfoot was used for stomach-ache, the ritual use of 3 being introduced into the recipe, just as the use of an odd number of each ingredient (1–3–5–7, etc.) is important in others cases.

At the end of the winter, in the period of Easter, young girls of Molise used to ask the "blessed palm" (Olea europaea L.) for their beloved, the leaves then being thrown on to burning coals for a sign or divination [2].

The presence of many rituals linked with officinal uses, and of several agricultural feasts of the grain [18], is a remainder of the pagan culture of the Romans and of even earlier populations.

A small archaeological bronze tablet ("Tavola Osca"), now kept in the British Museum in London, illustrates this agricultural background of the local culture. The tablet was found near the Monte del Cerro, between Capracotta and Agnone, in the place named "Uorte", that is to say kitchen garden (Hortus in Latin language and Hùrz on the tablet). We can learn from this very important tablet, dating back to 250 B.C., that the place was devoted to Kerrer (the goddess Cerere). According to this tablet, a sacrifice was made to four divinities near a sanctuary at the time of the Floralia feasts. On the tablet, several agricultural divinities are named, including: Cerere; Persefone (daughter of Cerere); Maia, Italic goddess of the spring; Flora, protector of the shoots) [88].

Besides, over two hundred years ago, the Molise region came under the spiritual administration of Benevento, a centre of ritual and witchcraft (see the famous Benevento walnut, around which witches use to dance). This influence was undoubtedly extremely strong in villages of the Molise, to the extent that Cardinal Orsini, later Pope Benedict XII, condemned certain superstitious practices in his LI edict, these practices being listed in Moffa [4].

Animal, plant and mineral derivatives in folk medicine

During the research activity, certain questions were asked during the interviews relating more generally to the animal world so as to obtain information that can help us have at least a partial understanding of the ethno-biological customs of this region. Further data was obtained from the papers consulted [24, 89]. Certain vegetable (ash and soot) and mineral uses are also reported (see Table 2). Some plant-derived products were not included in the main table (Additional file 1) for these reasons: a) cinders come from undetermined plants b) the information on the earwax applied with a Hyoscyamus sp. leave comes from a bibliographical reference and not from field research.


This survey was carried out in an ample research project for the study of the ethnobotanical resources of Italy [26, 3537, 5054, 86, 9093].

The predominance of external over internal uses, and of dermatological pathologies treated in the folk medicine of upper Molise can be connected with the still now rural culture of this area, where there is little industrial activity.

The research proves that the uses in veterinary science have been abandoned, and that the remedies of folk medicine are not very widely practiced today (only 25% of the total uses still continue). Nevertheless, the fact that eighty-two uses are reported by at least three informants among medicinal practices, whilst there are also 8 anti-parasitic uses, shows that there is still today a large consensus regarding this folk knowledge.

A certain quantity of new or rare uses were found, related to Lobaria pulmonaria, Pulmonaria apennina, Centaurium erythraea, Sonchus oleraceus etc. These novelties testify to the wealth of the local plant medicine. Some medicinal plants and small wood fruits could be cultivated in the large areas without pollution of the investigated area (see Lobaria pulmonaria).

Medicinal uses are sometimes still now bound to rituals, esteemed important in the past to reinforce the psychological efficacy of a plant drug. These rituals are connected with the primordial culture of the ancient populations. Animal and mineral derivatives enrich the inventory of local folk medicine remedies.

The values of E.I. (ethnobotanicity index) of the high Molise region for medicinal plants are among the highest in Italy, perhaps due to the geographic and cultural isolation of the studied area. Nevertheless they are much lower than those in Spanish areas, perhaps due to a more rapid process of cultural erosion that in Italy advanced more quickly that in Spain.

The consideration that the more frequently used plants grow in uncultivated areas, near ruins and damp sites, or in kitchen-gardens and fields, but not in woods (except for Abies alba), where men typically worked, leads us to consider once again the important role played by women in this field, as had already emerged from the interviews.

In the high Molise it was found that, within the four walls of the home, the principal role was played by the women, who were entrusted with almost all the tasks, whilst the men generally conducted their activities outside. It was also the woman's responsibility to treat minor ailments, mainly by means of decoctions which may vary from house to house although the basic composition was always the same.

The research conducted revealed a deep-rooted and widespread habit of husbanding the family's resources, mainly as a result of the isolation in which so many live. As we have already noted, the Upper Molise has a particularly cold and damp climate which still today can cause severe difficulties, especially during the winter months when there are heavy snowfalls even at low altitudes. This physical isolation has resulted in two major and onerous factors both for the individual family nucleus and for the community itself: 1) supplies are practically throughout the period of snowfalls. 2) preservation of foodstuffs, in particular grain and legumes. These, preserved in large quantities, were often damaged by worms and insects which could severe hunger for the entire family.

Whilst these factors contributed to the widespread knowledge of means of conserving foodstuffs, they also led to the use of products easily available within each home.


  1. 1.

    Guarrera PM: Primo contributo allo studio del patrimonio etnobotanico del Molise. Atti 97° Congresso della Società Botanica Italiana. Lecce 2003, 209. 24-27 settembre 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Conti O: Letteratura popolare capracottese. Napoli: L. Pierro; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pierro G: Storia di Cerce Maggiore (Benevento). Valle di Pompei: Tip. di Francesco Sicignano & F; 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Moffa S: Medicina popolare molisana. Napoli: A. Miccoli; 1937:1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Di Ciero M: Folklore di Agnone. Firenze: Olschki; 1971:78-80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Trombetta A: Mondo contadino d'altri tempi, i costumi del Molise. Napoli: Ed. Scientifiche italiane; 1989:141-142.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.


  8. 8.


  9. 9.

    Lucchese F: Elenco preliminare della flora spontanea del Molise. Ann Bot 1995,53(suppl 12):1-37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pallottino M: Genti e culture dell'Italia preromana. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Coarelli F, La Regina A: Abruzzo Molise. Guida archeologica. Bari: Laterza; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Avolio F: Il Molise. Dialetti italiani: storia, struttura, uso. Edited by: Cortelazzo M, De Blasi N, Marcato C, Clivio G. Torino: Utet; 2002:608-627.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bagnoli NL, Discenza M, Faralli GB: Dizionario dialettale. Lessico comparato dei comuni molisani compresi nelle valli interne del Biferno, del Trigno e del Volturno. Venafro: Vitmar; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    De Giovanni MM: Molise dialettale. Id., Studi linguistici. Verona: Antëditore; 1974:193-266.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Devoto G, Giacomelli G: I dialetti delle regioni d'Italia. Firenze: Sansoni; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Giammarco E: Dizionario abruzzese e molisano (DAM, 4 voll.). Roma: Edizioni dell'Ateneo; 1968–1979

  17. 17.

    Lugani V: Abruzzo e Molise. Milano: Ed. Aristea; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    T.C.I: Artigianato, sapori, tradizioni. Guida. Milano: T.C.I. ed; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abbate G: Le foreste della riserva MAB "Collemeluccio-Montedimezzo" (Molise, Italia meridionale). Doc phytosociol 1990, 12: 291-303.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pignatti S: Flora d'Italia. Volume 1–3. Bologna: Edagricole; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C: An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora. Roma: Ministero dell'Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio, Direzione per la Protezione della Natura. Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Palombi ed; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gastaldo P: Compendio della Flora Officinale Italiana. Padova: Piccin; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Boni U, Patri G: Scoprire, riconoscere, usare le erbe. Milano: Fabbri; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cappelletti EM: Ricerche etnofarmacobotaniche in alcune zone dell'Italia nord- orientale: specie vulnerarie. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali 1979,s. VIII, 66(6):577-586.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bellomaria B, Della Mora L: Novità nell'uso delle piante officinali per la zona di Matelica (Macerata) anche in confronto con altre zone delle Marche. Arch Bot Biogeogr Ital 1985,61(1–2):51-81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guarrera PM: Il Patrimonio etnobotanico del Lazio. Roma: Regione Lazio, Assessorato alla Cultura e Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale Università "La Sapienza", Tip. Tipar; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Uncini Manganelli RE, Tomei PE: Documenti per la conoscenza delle tradizioni etno- farmacobotaniche in Toscana. Lucca: Ed. Accademia Lucchese di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, studi e testi LVIII, S. Marco Litotipo; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Uncini Manganelli RE, Tomei PE: Ethnopharmacobotanical studies of the Tuscan Archipelago. J Ethnopharmacol 1999, 65: 181-202. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00177-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pieroni A: Medicinal plants and food medicines in the folk traditions of the upper Lucca Province, Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 2000, 70: 235-273. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00207-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ballero M, Poli F, Sacchetti G, Loi MC: Ethnobotanical research in the territory of Fluminimaggiore (south-western Sardinia). Fitoterapia 2001,72(7):788-800. 10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00334-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Leporatti ML, Corradi L: Ethnobotanical remarks on the province of Chieti. J Ethnopharmacol 2001, 74: 17-40. 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00325-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pieroni A, Nebel S, Quave C, Munz H, Heinrich M: Ethnopharmacy of the ethnic Albanians (Arbëreshë) of northern Basilicata, Italy. Fitoterapia 2002, 73: 217-241. 10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00063-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pieroni A, Quave C, Santoro RF: Folk pharmaceutical knowledge in the territory of the Dolomiti Lucane, inland southern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 2004, 95: 373-384. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.08.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Atzei AD: Le piante nella tradizione popolare della Sardegna. Sassari: C. Delfino; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Viegi L, Pieroni A, Guarrera PM, Vangelisti R: A review of plants used in folk veterinary medicine in Italy as basis for a databank. J Ethnopharmacol 2003, 89: 221-244. 10.1016/j.jep.2003.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Guarrera PM, Forti G, Marignoli S: Ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal uses of plants in the district of Acquapendente (Latium, Central Italy). J Ethnopharmacol 2005,96(3):429-444. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Guarrera PM, Salerno G, Caneva G: Folk phytotherapeutical plants from Maratea area (Basilicata, Italy). J Ethnopharmacol 2005, 99: 367-378. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Scherrer AM, Motti R, Weckerle CS: Traditional plant use in the areas of Monte Vesole and Ascea, Cilento National Park (Campania, Southern Italy). J Ethnopharmacol 2005, 97: 129-143. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tammaro F, Xepapadakis G: Plants used in phytotherapy, cosmetics and dyeing in the Pramanda district (Epirus, North-West Greece). J Ethnopharmacol 1986, 16: 167-174. 10.1016/0378-8741(86)90087-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gonzàles-Tejero MR, Molero-Mesa J, Casares-Porcel M, Martìnez Lirola MJ: New contributions to the ethnopharmacology of Spain. J Ethnopharmacol 1995, 45: 157-165. 10.1016/0378-8741(94)01208-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bonet MA, Blanché C, Vallès Xirau J: Ethnobotanical study in River Tenes valley (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). J Ethnopharmacol 1992, 37: 205-212. 10.1016/0378-8741(92)90035-P

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bonet MA, Parada M, Selga A, Vallès J: Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the regions of L'Alt Empordà and Les Guilleries (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). J Ethnopharmacol 1999, 68: 145-168. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00083-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Novaretti R, Lemordant D: Plants in the traditional medicine of the Ubaye valley. J Ethnopharmacol 1990, 30: 1-34. 10.1016/0378-8741(90)90014-K

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Raja D, Blanché C, Vallès Xirau J: Contribution to the knowledge of the pharmaceutical ethnobotany of la Segarra region (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). J Ethnopharmacol 1997, 57: 149-160. 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00059-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Vàzquez FM, Suarez MA, Pérez A: Medicinal plants used in the Barros Area, Badajoz Province (Spain). J Ethnopharmacol 1997, 55: 81-85. 10.1016/S0378-8741(96)01491-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pieroni A, Dibra B, Grishaj G, Grishaj I, Gjon Maçai S: Traditional phytotherapy of the Albanians of Lepushe, Northern Albanian Alps. Fitoterapia 2005, 76: 379-399. 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Agelet A, Vallès J: Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region of Pallars (Pyrenees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Part II. New or very rare uses of previously known medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol 2003, 84: 211-227. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00319-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Portères R: Ethnobotanique générale. Paris: Laboratoire d'Ethnobotanique et Ethnozoologie, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Coassini Lokar L, Poldini L: Herbal remedies in the traditional medicine of the Venezia Giulia region (North East Italy). J Ethnopharmacol 1988, 22: 231-278. 10.1016/0378-8741(88)90238-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Guarrera PM: Usi tradizionali delle piante nel territorio della Maiella. In Rivista Abruzzese. Fasc. Monograf. "Erbe e piante medicinali nella storia e nelle tradizioni popolari abruzzesi". Centro Servizi Culturali Regione Abruzzo (Chieti). Stab. Tip. Anxanum, Lanciano; 1987:17-45.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Guarrera PM, Forti G, Marignoli S, Gelsomini G: Piante e tradizione popolare ad Acquapendente. Acquapendente, Museo del Fiore; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Salerno G, Guarrera PM, Caneva G: Agricultural, domestic and handicraft folk uses of plants in the Tyrrhenian sector of Basilicata (Italy). J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2005, 1: 2. 10.1186/1746-4269-1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Guarrera PM, Salerno G, Caneva G: Food, flavouring and feed plant traditions in the Tyrrhenian sector of Basilicata, Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2006, 2: 37. 10.1186/1746-4269-2-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Guarrera PM: Usi e tradizioni della flora italiana. Medicina popolare ed etnobotanica. Roma, Aracne; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tammaro F, Pirone G: Flora e vegetazione del Parco. In Il Parco Nazionale della Majella. Volume 1. Pescara: Multimedia ed; 1997:137-154.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Scoppola A: Flora vascolare della Riserva Naturale Monte Rufeno (Viterbo, Italia Centrale). Webbia 54: 207-220.

  57. 57.

    Anzalone B: Botanica Farmaceutica. L'Aquila: Japadre; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Odabasoglu F, Aslan A, Cakir A, Suleyman H, Karagos Y, Halici M, Bayir Y: Comparison of antioxidant activity and phenolic content of the lichen species. Phytother Res 2004,18(11):938-941. 10.1002/ptr.1488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Catalano S, Marsili A, Morelli I, Pacchiani M: Hydrocarbons sterols and fatty acids of Lobaria pulmonaria . Phytochem 1976, 15: 221. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89091-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Safe S, Safe L, Maass WSG: Sterols of three lichen species: Lobaria pulmonaria, Lobaria scrobiculata and Usnea longissima . Phytochem 1975, 14: 1821-1823. 10.1016/0031-9422(75)85302-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Gonzàlez AG, Bermejo Barrera J, Rodriguez Pérez EM, Hernàndez Padròn CE: Depsidones from Lobaria pulmonaria and their chemotaxonomic importance. Biochem System Ecol 1994, 22: 583-586. 10.1016/0305-1978(94)90070-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Suleyman H, Odabasoglu F, Aslan A, Cakir A, Karagos Y, Gocer F, Halici M, Bayir Y: Anti-inflammatory and antiulcerogenic effects of the acqueous extract of Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm. Phytomedicine 2003,10(6–7):552-557. 10.1078/094471103322331539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Hawksworth DL, Iturriaga T, Crespo A: Líquenes como bioindicadores inmediatos de contaminación y cambios medio-ambientales en los trópicos. Rev Iberoamer Micol 2005, 22: 71-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lomagno P, Lomagno Caramiello R: La fitoterapia popolare nella valle di Susa. Allionia 1970, 16: 165-174.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Agelet A, Vallès J: Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region of Pallars (Pyrenees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Part III. Medicinal uses of non-vascular plants. J Ethnopharmacol 2003, 84: 229-234. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00320-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Appi E, Appi R, Pagnucco A, Pagnucco D: Le piante nell'uso popolare in Friuli (terapia e cucina). Pordenone: Edizioni Concordia Sette; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Marino A, Elberti MG, Cataldo A: Phytochemical investigation of Adiantum capillus-veneris . Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 1989,65(5):461-463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Nakane T, Maeda Y, Ebihara H, Aray Y, Masuda K, Takano A, Ageta H, Shiojima K, Cai SQ, Abdel-Halim OB: Fern constituents: triterpenoids from Adiantum capillus-veneris . Chem Pharm Bull 2002,50(9):1273-1275. 10.1248/cpb.50.1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Chopra RN, Nayar SL, Chopra IC: Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Moerman D: Native American Ethnobotany. Oregon: Timber Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Huxley A: The New RHS Dictionary of Gardening. Mc. Millan Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Cappelletti EM, Cirio ME, Mutti L: L'uso delle piante officinali nella medicina popolare del Feltrino (Belluno). Atti Ist Veneto Sci, Lett Arti 1979, 137: 113-131.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lomagno Caramiello R, Piervittori A, Lomagno PA, Rolando C: Fitoterapia popolare nelle Valli Chisoni e Germanasca. Annali Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie, Università di Torino 1984, XIII: 259-298.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Rando MT, Servettaz O: Ricerche sull'uso delle piante medicinali in Val Rendena. Webbia 1979, 33: 511-529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Chiovenda-Bensi C: Tradizione e usi fitoterapici popolari, la Valsesia. Atti Accademia Ligustica Sci. Lettere 1957, 13: 190-205.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Sella A: Flora popolare biellese. Nomi dialettali, tradizioni e usi locali. Collana della Fondazione Sella Alessandria: Edizioni Dell'Orso; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Schauenberg P, Paris F: Le piante medicinali. Roma: Newton Compton; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zhen H, Fang FYDY, Shu SN, Zhou YF, Dong YS, Nie XC, Li G: Experimental study on the action of allitridin against human cytomegalovirus in vitro: Inhibitory effects on immediate-early genes. Antivir Res 2006, 72: 68-74. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2006.03.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Bianchi A, Gallifuoco G: Farmacopea Popolare del Gargano. Natural 1 2004, 32: 54-66.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Schweiggert U, Carle R, Schieber A: Characterization of major and minor capsaicinoids and related compounds in chili pods ( Capsicum frutescens L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmosferic pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Analyt Chim Acta 2006, 557: 236-244. 10.1016/j.aca.2005.10.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nolte DL, Barnett JP: A repellent to reduce mice predation of longleaf pine seed. Internat Biodeterior Biodegrad 2000,45(3–4):169-174. 10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00060-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Antonious GF, Meyer JE, Snyder JC: Toxicity and repellency of hot pepper extracts to spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. J Environm Sci Health 2006,41(8):1383-1391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Tammaro F: Flora officinale d'Abruzzo. Chieti: Giunta Regionale d'Abruzzo. Centro Servizi Culturali; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Valerio L, Maroli M: Evaluation of repellent and anti-feeding effect of garlic oil ( Allium sativum ) against the bite of phlebotomine sandflies Diptera: Psychodidae). Annali Istituto Superiore di Sanità 2005,41(2):253-256.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Bhuyan M, Saxena BN, Rao KM: Repellent property of oil fraction of garlic, Allium sativum Linn. Indian J Experim Biol 1974,12(6):575-576.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Guarrera PM: Traditional antihelmintic, antiparasitic and repellent uses of plants in Central Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 1999, 68: 183-192. 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00089-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Manzi A: Piante utilizzate nella veterinaria popolare a Gessopalena (CH). Rivista Abruzzese 1989,XLII(3):253-260.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.


  89. 89.

    Gioielli M: Etnomemorie, le tradizioni popolari di Pesche. Campobasso: Palladino; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Guarrera PM: Household dyeing plants and traditional uses in some areas of Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2006, 2: 9. 10.1186/1746-4269-2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Passalacqua NG, De Fine G, Guarrera PM: Contribution to the knowledge of the veterinary science and of the ethnobotany in Calabria region (Southern Italy). J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2006, 2: 52. 10.1186/1746-4269-2-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Nedelcheva AM, Dogan Y, Guarrera PM: Plants traditionally used to make brooms in several European countries. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2007, 3: 20. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Guarrera PM, Leporatti ML: Ethnobotanical remarks on Central and Southern Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 2007, 3: 23. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are indebted to all those who gave information during the period of research, and in particular to (age in 2005): Di Domenico Alberto, 80, shepherd, (CA); Di Iorio Verino, 92, farmer (PI).; Di Carlo Giovannina, 79, housewife (PI); Diamante Giovanna, 65, housewife (CH), maternal family (CA); Diamante Maria, 70, housewife (CH), maternal family (CA); Tesone Alessandro, 69, woodcutter (PI); Carosella Elvira, 81, farmer, district of Cassille (AG); Caldararo Antonietta, 75, farmer (PE); Di Pinto Giovanna, 82, farmer (PI); Della Croce Lidia, 81, farmer (VG), maternal family (CA); Della Croce Luigi, 78, farmer (VG); Sciulli Domenico, 70, carpenter (PS).; Musacchio Lucio, 40, agricultural-forest worker (CP); Martella Nicola, approx. 50, forest worker (PE).; Jacovoni Maria and son, 81, housewife (PI), maternal family (PS).

Besides the authors express their gratitude to Angelo Merante for illustrating Fig. 1, to Prof. Francesco Avolio for information on the dialect, to Penelope Watson for the revision of the English language and to the anonymous referees for their suggestions for improving the first version of the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Lucchese.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

The field work for data collection was carried out above all by SM. Data analysis was conducted by all authors. The manuscript was prepared by PMG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Medicinal, anti-parasitic and ritual uses of plants in the high Molise region. The data provided concern mainly medicinal and anti-parasitic uses of plants collected during field interviews in the high Molise region. Some ritual uses of plants are also described. (PDF 100 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guarrera, P.M., Lucchese, F. & Medori, S. Ethnophytotherapeutical research in the high Molise region (Central-Southern Italy). J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 4, 7 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Folk Medicine
  • Beeswax
  • Allium Sativum
  • Molise Region
  • Kitchen Garden