Skip to main content

Indigenous use and bio-efficacy of medicinal plants in the Rasuwa District, Central Nepal



By revealing historical and present plant use, ethnobotany contributes to drug discovery and socioeconomic development. Nepal is a natural storehouse of medicinal plants. Although several ethnobotanical studies were conducted in the country, many areas remain unexplored. Furthermore, few studies have compared indigenous plant use with reported phytochemical and pharmacological properties.


Ethnopharmacological data was collected in the Rasuwa district of Central Nepal by conducting interviews and focus group discussions with local people. The informant consensus factor (FIC) was calculated in order to estimate use variability of medicinal plants. Bio-efficacy was assessed by comparing indigenous plant use with phytochemical and pharmacological properties determined from a review of the available literature. Criteria were used to identify high priority medicinal plant species.


A total of 60 medicinal formulations from 56 plant species were documented. Medicinal plants were used to treat various diseases and disorders, with the highest number of species being used for gastro-intestinal problems, followed by fever and headache. Herbs were the primary source of medicinal plants (57% of the species), followed by trees (23%). The average FIC value for all ailment categories was 0.82, indicating a high level of informant agreement compared to similar studies conducted elsewhere. High FIC values were obtained for ophthalmological problems, tooth ache, kidney problems, and menstrual disorders, indicating that the species traditionally used to treat these ailments are worth searching for bioactive compounds: Astilbe rivularis, Berberis asiatica, Hippophae salicifolia, Juniperus recurva, and Swertia multicaulis. A 90% correspondence was found between local plant use and reported plant chemical composition and pharmacological properties for the 30 species for which information was available. Sixteen medicinal plants were ranked as priority species, 13 of which having also been prioritized in a country-wide governmental classification.


The Tamang people possess rich ethnopharmacological knowledge. This study allowed to identify many high value and high priority medicinal plant species, indicating high potential for economic development through sustainable collection and trade.


Ethnobotany reveals historical and present plant use to fulfil a wide variety of human needs [1, 2]. Documenting indigenous knowledge through the ethnobiological approach is important for species conservation and sustainable resource use [3]. Furthermore, such studies are often significant in revealing locally important plant species, sometimes leading to the discovery of crude drugs [4, 5], or contributing to economic development.

Globally, millions of people in the developing world rely on medicinal plants for primary health care, income generation and livelihood improvement [6]. Indigenous people living on their traditional territory largely rely on medicinal plants for healthcare and they are therefore rich in ethnopharmacological knowledge. The interest in phytomedicine has been renewed over the last decade and several medicinal plant species are now being screened for pharmacological potential. According to Laird and Pierce [7], the world market for herbal remedies was worth 19.4 billion US$ in 1999. The global demand for medicinal plants is increasing and, in India alone, the market is expanding at an annual rate of 20% [8, 9]. Scientific research is needed to determine the active principles of traditional medicinal recipes and to evaluate their effectiveness, so that benefits could be equally shared among local peoples in the spirit of the Convention on Biological Diversity [10].

Medicinal plants play vital roles in the Nepalese livelihood [11] and the use of medicinal plants is frequent in several Nepalese regions [1214]. It is estimated that only 15-20% of the population of Nepal - living in and around urban areas - have access to modern medicinal facilities, whereas the rest depend on traditional medicines [11]. Nepal is a natural storehouse of medicinal plants [12, 15, 16]. Each year thousands of tons of raw material are exported, mostly to India, but also to Asia, Europe and America [17]. The government of Nepal aims to promote medicinal plant use and conservation programmes for livelihood improvement and poverty alleviation through various policies [11]. However, the contribution of this sector to the national economy is still nominal.

Several ethnopharmacological studies have been conducted in Nepal [13, 15, 16, 18, 19], but many parts of the country remain unexplored. Few studies have attempted to estimate use variability of Nepalese medicinal plants or to evaluate their bio-efficacy [20, 21]. Therefore, this study was conducted in order to achieve the following objectives:

  1. 1.

    Document the medicinal plants used in the traditional healthcare delivery system of the Chilime Village Development Committee (VDC) of the Rasuwa district of Central Nepal,

  2. 2.

    Estimate use variability of medicinal plants, indicating informant agreement,

  3. 3.

    Evaluate the bio-efficacy of medicinal plants by comparing local use with findings from published phytochemical and pharmacological studies,

  4. 4.

    Identify priority medicinal plant species for the Rasuwa district.

Study area

A field study was carried out in the Chilime VDC of the Rasuwa district of Central Nepal. The district lies between 27° 2' and 27° 10' N and 84° 45' and 85° 88' E, with altitude ranging from 792 to 7245 m a.s.l. The Rasuwa district presents some of the best examples of graded climatic conditions in Central Himalaya. Pronounced altitudinal gradients, coupled with complex topography and geology, have resulted in a rich biodiversity and unique vegetation patchwork [22]. Therefore, the district harbours a rich diversity of medicinal plants. The Chilime VDC lies in the northern part of the district, bordering the Tibetan part of China, and comprises temperate to alpine climates within 2000-4700 m altitude (Fig. 1). The local inhabitants are part of the Tamang indigenous people, which comprises 98% of the total Chilime VDC population [23]. People from the Tamang ethnic group have a rich culture and possess sound traditional knowledge. However, they are economically and socially marginalized and far from having their basic needs fulfilled.

Figure 1

Location of the study area in the Rasuwa district of Central Nepal.


Ethnopharmacological data was collected by conducting interviews and focus group discussions with local people (50% > 40 years old), from July to September 2007. A total of 50 household heads (56% male and 44% female) from the Chilime VDC of the Rasuwa district participated in the study. Participants were purposively selected to include key informants [24] like plant collectors, medicinal plant cultivators, traditional healers, and traders. Respondents were all from the Tamang ethnic group, predominant (65%) in the Rasuwa district. The majority (62%) of the respondents had no formal education, 18% had primary school education, 12% had secondary education, and 8% had university level education. Prior informed consent was obtained with the help of community workers [25] that also facilitated interviews and discussions with the local people. Consent was granted by the local people for the dissemination of their traditional knowledge.

Guidelines for the interviews and group discussions were developed to facilitate the collection of information. Interviews and group discussions were conducted to gather information on plant uses, parts used, and modes of utilization. A checklist was developed and used to determine what species were used to treat what kinds of diseases/disorders. Herbarium specimens were collected for those species for which field identification was not certain and brought back to the lab to facilitate identification using reference collections [2629] and expert knowledge. The specimens are deposited at the Tribhuvan University Central Herbarium (TUCH).

The informant consensus factor (FIC) was calculated to estimate use variability of medicinal plants [30, 31]. FIC values range from 0.00 to 1.00. High FIC values are obtained when only one or a few plant species are reported to be used by a high proportion of informants to treat a particular ailment, whereas low FIC values indicate that informants disagree over which plant to use [30]. High FIC values can thus be used to pinpoint particularly interesting species for the search of bioactive compounds [31]. FIC is calculated using the following formula [30, 31]:

where Nur is the number of individual plant use reports for a particular illness category, and Nt is the total number of species used by all informants for this illness category.

Medicinal plant species were ranked according to prioritization criteria developed by the Herbs and Non-Timber Forest Products Coordination Committee of Nepal and the National Medicinal Plants Board of India, and synthesized at the First National Trade Show and Seminar on Herbs, Herbal Products and Spices, held November 12-14, 2005 in Nepalgunj, West Nepal [32]:

  • Market value/price

  • Quantity exported annually recorded by the District Forest Office

  • Average annual export to India and abroad

  • Annual industrial demand in Kathmandu

  • Ease of cultivation/domestication

  • Royalties

  • Parts used

  • Bulkiness (availability in large quantities)

  • Social acceptance for further processing

  • Quality improvement

  • Distribution range

  • Threat category

  • Legal protection

  • Availability of local processing techniques

  • Regeneration/rotation period

  • Ethno-botanic importance

  • Potential for further processing

Criteria accounting for availability, local knowledge and use, and market demand were given more weight. Indigenous uses determined from interviews and discussion groups, and phytochemical and pharmacological properties determined from a review of the available literature were compared for all species for which information was available.


The ethnobotanical survey identified a total of 56 medicinal plant species used to prepare a wide variety of remedies (Additional file 1). Angiosperms were predominant, with 44 species belonging to 29 families (Fig. 2), followed by Pteridophytes (6 species from 4 families), Gymnosperms (3 species from 3 families), Lichens (2 species from 1 family) and Fungi (1 species). The prevailing life form was herbs, followed by trees, shrubs, lichens, climbers and fungi (Fig. 3).

Figure 2

Number of medicinal plant species (black bars) and families (grey bars) in major taxonomic categories.

Figure 3

Percentage distribution of medicinal plant species according to life form.

Almost all plant parts were used to prepare different medicinal formulations: roots, rhizomes, tubers, bark, leaves, flowers, fruits, pollen, young shoots, and whole plants (Additional file 1). The most frequently used plant parts were roots, followed by leaves, whole plants, fruits, and rhizomes (Fig. 4). Use of multiple plant parts was also recorded in a few cases (Additional file 1).

Figure 4

Use frequency (number of species) of different plant parts in traditional medicine preparation.

Ailments treated and remedies formulation

Cuts and wounds, respiratory problems, gastro-intestinal disorders, cough and cold, musculo-skeletal problems, fever and headache, weakness and dizziness, menstrual disorders, dermatological infections, ophthalmological problems, and tooth ache were the main ailments treated with medicinal plants. Gastro-intestinal disorders, fever and headache, cuts and wounds, cough and cold, and musculo-skeletal problems were treated with the highest diversity of medicinal plant species (Additional file 1, Table 1). Although most species were only used to treat one ailment (34/56), some were found having up to four different medicinal uses (Table 1).

Table 1 Medicinal plants used to cure various ailments.

Most people who participated in interviews and group discussions were familiar with the species used to deal with common ailments like cough and cold, digestive problems, fever, headache, skin infection, and in such cases plant based medicinal remedies were used on a regular basis. For complex problems like chest pain, menstrual disorders, rheumatism, or eye and kidney problems, people took advice from local traditional healers. Traditional healers believe in a form of sanctity of the curative power of medicinal plants. They thus keep secrecy over remedy formulation, believing that the medicines would lose their potency if revealed to other people.

A total of 60 medicinal formulations were prepared from the 56 medicinal plants identified in this study. Two formulations were prepared using five different species, while all other formulations were prepared using a single species. Preparation methods included paste, juice, decoction, infusion and chewing the raw plant (Table 2, Fig. 5). The majority of formulations were prepared as paste or juice. Crushing, pounding, and grinding are executed using a pestle in a mortar made of hard stone.

Table 2 Common forms of preparation methods for remedies made of medicinal plants.
Figure 5

Use frequency (number of medicinal formulations) of different remedy preparation techniques.

Informant consensus factor

The level of informant agreement was high for most ailment categories (mean FIC = 0.82) and total consensus (FIC = 1.00) was even obtained for ophthalmological problems, tooth ache and kidney problems (Table 3). Gastro-intestinal disorders, as well as fever and headache showed relatively low levels of consensus (FIC = 0.53 and 0.61, respectively).

Table 3 Informant consensus factor (FIC) for different ailment categories.

Prioritization of medicinal plant species

Respondents were asked to prioritize medicinal plant species based on the criteria developed at the First National Trade Show and Seminar on Herbs, Herbal Products and Spices (see Methods and [32]). After consultations with the local people, district forest staff, NGO representatives, and researchers, a final list of 16 high-priority species was obtained (Table 4).

Table 4 List of priority medicinal plant species for the Rasuwa district of Central Nepal.

Bio-efficacy of traditionally-used medicinal plants

Phytochemical and pharmacological studies were found in the literature for 30 of the 56 medicinal plant species used by the Tamang people of the Chilime VDC, Rasuwa district, Central Nepal. Comparison of reported traditional use with known phytochemical and pharmacological properties showed complete or partial correspondence for 27 of the 30 plants (Table 5). Twelve of the 30 plants for which phytochemical/pharmacological information was found in the literature were high-priority species in the Rasuwa district (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 5 Comparison of local use and phytochemical/pharmacological properties of medicinal plants.


Traditional use of medicinal plants in Chilime

Altogether, 56 species of medicinal plants were identified as being used in traditional medical systems in the Rasuwa district of central Nepal. As indicated for the Dolkha district, having more or less the same economic, social and ecological characteristics, reliance on medicinal plants for health care was associated with poverty, lack of accessibility to modern healthcare facilities, and traditional belief about plant effectiveness [20]. Herbs are the primary source of medicinal plant species, followed by trees, most likely because herbs are more abundant. It is believed that the more abundant a plant is, the more medicinal virtues it may possess [20, 33]. The ease with which plants can be collected, stored, and transported and the ease with which bioactive compounds can be extracted are also factors that contribute to the preference for herbs [20]. Moreover, most species used in the traditional health care system of the Chilime VDC are harvested from the wild. This is common practice all over the world, as was observed in Cameroon [34], Uganda [35] and Peru [36], for example. The preference for root to prepare traditional remedies follows the scientific reasoning that roots generally contain high concentrations of bioactive compounds [37].

Informant agreement

The average FIC value for all ailment categories was 0.82, indicating a high level of informant agreement compared to similar studies conducted in Mexico [30, 31, 38], Belize [39], and India [40], for example. Particularly high FIC values were obtained for ophthalmological problems, tooth ache, kidney problems, and menstrual disorders (Table 3), indicating that the species that are traditionally used to treat these ailments are worth searching for bioactive compounds: Berberis asiatica, Astilbe rivularis, Juniperus recurva, Swertia multicaulis, and Hippophae salicifolia. The latter three species, as well as Valeriana jatamansi, are also of interest as they are traditionally used to treat three or four different ailment types (see Table 1).

Bio-efficacy of medicinal plants

Empirical observations on the use of medicinal plants by the Tamang people of the Rasuwa district needed to be substantiated with phytochemical and pharmacological studies in order to corroborate their bio-efficacy. Such concerns were raised by ethnomedicinal studies carried out in Nepal, but few studies have provided the needed evidence [19, 20]. Comparison of local uses and phytochemical/pharmacological properties for 30 medicinal plant species showed that traditional use was coherent with known phytochemical or pharmacological properties in 90% of the cases (Table 5).

Comparison of the information on traditional medicinal plant use in the Rasuwa district with ethnobotanical studies conducted in other areas of Nepal [15, 18, 20, 41] shows similar results for many species. This is of significance because identical plant use by different people from different areas may be a reliable indication of curative properties. Like in other rural communities of Nepal [15, 20, 42, 43], knowledge about traditional uses of medicinal plants is transferred from the household seniors and other elders. In many cases, this knowledge is transmitted orally, from generation to generation, and remains confined to a limited group of people [44]. Documentation efforts undertaken by Nepalese researchers in order to document traditional use of medicinal plants [1315, 20, 45] should continue, especially as the results presented here place traditional and scientific knowledge on equal footing.

Sustainable management and use of medicinal plants

The criteria used to identify priority medicinal plant species [32] are very practical and useful in the regional context and are highly reliable as they were synthesized by experts based on national and international data. The 16 priority species identified here are highly valued on national and international markets [46]. Importantly, 13 of the 16 species prioritized in the present study are also priority species identified by the central Government of Nepal, which recognized 30 medicinal plant species for promotion of commercial use and trade [32]. Therefore, it is important to consider these species to implement policy and to guide management authorities of the Rasuwa district for proper management and use of medicinal plants to benefit local people in their traditional healthcare delivery systems and income generation activities [6, 47].

Unsustainable harvesting, over-exploitation and habitat degradation have been identified as major threats to the sustainability of medicinal plants in the district. The medicinal plants sector has the potential to achieve sustainability, given the availability of resources, people's willingness to participate in conservation programmes, and the priority given to the sector by the government and other organizations. Sustainable harvesting, effective domestication methods, community participatory management, and the provision of information, education and awareness programmes to the community are key strategies that can help optimize the benefits of the medicinal plants sector in Nepal [45].


The Tamang people of the Rasuwa district of central Nepal possess rich ethnopharmacological knowledge and therefore use several medicinal plant species in their traditional healthcare delivery system. The striking coincidence between traditional plant use and scientifically-proven phytochemical and pharmacological properties shows that the traditional remedies are an important and effective part of indigenous healthcare systems in the district. However, published information on phytochemical and pharmacological properties are still limited for many plant species used in the district. Detailed phytochemical and pharmacological studies of traditionally-used medicinal plants is thus an important line of research to pursue, especially for species showing high informant consensus, like Astilbe rivularis, Berberis asiatica, Hippophae salicifolia, Juniperus recurva, and Swertia multicaulis. Medicinal plants provide huge opportunities for community development and livelihood improvement. However, local people are often deprived of the benefits from these resources [45]. Proper management of high-value and high-priority medicinal plants could serve as a sustainable income source for the communities. This would in turn help generate incentives for biodiversity conservation, thus ensuring the long-term availability of medicinal plants for indigenous and commercial uses.


  1. 1.

    Nyazema ZN: Ethnobotany and tradition medicinal practice in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Science News. 1996, 30: 104-109.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Njoroge GN, Bussmann RW, Gemmill B, Newton LE, Ngumi VW: Utilization of weed species as sources of traditional medicines in Central Kenya. Lyonia. 2004, 7: 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gemedo-Dalle T, Maass BL, Isselstein J: Plant biodiversity and ethnobotany of Borana pastoralists in Southern Oromla, Ethiopia. Econ Bot. 2005, 59: 43-65. 10.1663/0013-0001(2005)059[0043:PBAEOB]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cox AP, Balick JM: Ethnobotanical research and traditional health care in developing countries. Plants, people and culture. 1996, New Work: W.H. Freeman and Co

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Flaster T: Ethnobotanical approaches to the discovery of bioactive compounds. Progress in new crops: Proceedings of the third national symposium. New crops: New opportunities, new technologies: 22-25 October 1995; Indianapolis. Edited by: Janick E. 1996, Alexandria: ASHS Press, 561-656.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    WHO (World Health Organization): WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005. Geneva;. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Laird SA, Pierce AR: Promoting sustainable and ethical botanicals: strategies to improve commercial raw material sourcing. 2002, New York: Rainforest Alliance

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Srivastava R: Studying the information needs of medicinal plant stakeholders in Europe. TRAFFIC Dispatches. 2000, 15: 5-

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Subrat N: Ayurvedic and herbal products industry: An overview. Proceedings of the regional workshop on wise practices and experiential learning in the conservation and management of Himalayan medicinal plants: December 15-20 2002; Kathmandu, Nepal. 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    CBD: 1992, Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, []

  11. 11.

    Sharma UR, Malla KJ, Uprety RK: Conservation and management efforts of medicinal and aromatic plants in Nepal. Banko Janakari. 2004, 14: 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shrestha KK, Tiwari NN, Ghimire SK: MAPDON - Medicinal and aromatic plant database of Nepal. Proceedings of Nepal-Japan joint symposium on conservation and utilization of Himalayan medicinal sources: 6-11 November 2000; Kathmandu, Nepal. 2001, 53-74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bhattarai S, Chaudhary RP, Taylor RSL: Ethnomedicinal plants used by the people of Manang district, Central Nepal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006, 2: 41-10.1186/1746-4269-2-41.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kunwar RM, Bussmann RW: Ethnobotany in the Nepal Himalaya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008, 4: 24-10.1186/1746-4269-4-24.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Manandhar NP: Plants and people of Nepal. 2002, Oregon: Timber Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baral SR, Kurmi PP: A compendium of medicinal plants in Nepal. 2006, Kathmandu: Rachana Sharma

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Edwards DM: Non-timber forest products from Nepal. Aspects of the trade in medicinal and aromatic plants. FORSEC Monographs. 1996, 1: 6-24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rajbhandari KR: Ethnobotany of Nepal. 2001, Kathmandu: Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shrestha KK, Tiwari NN, Rajbhandary S, Poudel RC, Uprety Y: Ethnobotany in Nepal: Review and perspectives. 2004, Project report submitted to WWF Nepal Program, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shrestha PM, Dhillion SS: Medicinal plant diversity and use in the highlands of Dolakha district, Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 86: 81-96. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00051-5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kunwar RM, Uprety Y, Burlakoti C, Chowdhary CL, Bussmann CW: Indigenous use and ethnopharmacology of medicinal plants in Far-west Nepal. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2009, 7: 5-28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chaudhary RP: Biodiversity in Nepal: Status and conservation. 1998, Thailand: Tecpress Books

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics): Statistical year book of Nepal 2003. 2003, Kathmandu: Central Bureau of Statistics

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Huntington HP: Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecol Appl. 2000, 10: 1270-1274. 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:UTEKIS]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Martin GJ: Ethnobotany: a methods manual. 1995, London: Chapman and Hall

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hara H, Williams LHJ: An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal. 1979, London: British Museum (Natural History), ii:

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hara H, Charter AH, Williams LHJ: An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal. 1982, London: British Museum (Natural History), iii:

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Polunin O, Stainton A: Flowers of the Himalaya. 1984, New Delhi: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Press JR, Shrestha KK, Sutton DA: Annotated checklist of flowering plants of Nepal. 2000, London: Natural History Museum

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O: Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998, 47: 91-112. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00181-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Canales M, Hernandez T, Caballero J, Romo de Vivar A, Avila G, Duran A, Lira R: Informant consensus factor and antibacterial activity of the medicinal plants used by the people of San Rafael Coxcatlan, Puebla, Mexico. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97: 429-439. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.013.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    CECI: Synthesis of seminar presentations and discussions on herbs, herbal products and spices: November 12-14 2005; Nepalgunj, West Nepal. 2006, Kathmandu: Canadian Center for International Studies and Cooperation

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Coe FG, Anderson GJ: Ethnobotany of the Garifuna of Eastern Nicaragua. Econ Bot. 1996, 50: 71-107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zanyine JS: Use of medicinal plants in Oku (Cameroon). Masters thesis. 2007, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Human Ecology

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tabuti JRS, Lye KA, Dhillion SS: Traditional herbal drugs of Bulamogi, Uganda: Plants, use and administration. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 88: 19-44. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00161-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bussmann RW, Sharon D: Traditional medicinal plant use in Northern Peru. Tracking 2000 years of healing culture. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006, 2: 47-10.1186/1746-4269-2-47.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Moore PD: Trials in bad taste. Nature. 1994, 370: 410-411. 10.1038/372410a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Heinrich M: Ethnobotany and its role in drug development. Phytother Res. 2000, 14: 479-488. 10.1002/1099-1573(200011)14:7<479::AID-PTR958>3.0.CO;2-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Amiguet VT, Arnason JT, Maquin P, Cal V, Sanchez Vindas P, Poveda L: A consensus ethnobotany of the Q'eqchi' Maya of southern Belize. Econ Bot. 2005, 59: 29-42. 10.1663/0013-0001(2005)059[0029:ACEOTQ]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ragupathy S, Newmaster SG, Murugesan M, Balasubramaniam V, Huda M: Consensus of the 'Malasars' traditional aboriginal knowledge of medicinal plants in the Velliangiri holy hills, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008, 4: 8-10.1186/1746-4269-4-8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Joshi AR, Joshi K: Indigenous knowledge and uses of medicinal plants by local communities of the Kali Gandanki watershed area, Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73: 175-183. 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00301-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Manandhar NP: Folklore medicine of Dhading District, Nepal. Fitoterapia. 1992, 63: 163-177.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Uprety Y, Boon EK, Poudel RC: Traditional use of plant resources by Bankariya ethnic group in Makwanpur district, central Nepal. 2008, Germany: GRIN publisher, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Subedi BP: Policy and regulatory environment for the conservation and utilization of Himalayan medicinal resources in Nepal. Proceedings of Nepal-Japan joint symposium on conservation and utilization of Himalayan medicinal sources: 6-11 November 2000; Kathmandu, Nepal. 2001, 19-26.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Uprety Y: Medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) in an alpine environment: A case study of Rasuwa district, Central Nepal. Masters thesis. 2008, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Department of Human Ecology

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tiwari NN, Poudel RC, Uprety Y: Study on domestic market of medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) in Kathmandu Valley. 2004, Project report prepared for Winrock International, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    WHO, IUCN, WWF: Guidelines on the conservation of medicinal plants. 1993, Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union (IUCN), in partnership with The World Health Organization (WHO) and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hanuman JB, Katz A: Diterpenoid alkaloids from ayurvedic processed and unprocessed Aconitum ferox. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 36: 1527-1535.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vaksaraj R, Pushpangadan P, Smitt UW, Adserden A, Nyman U: Antimicrobial screening of selected medicinal plants from India. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 58: 75-83. 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00085-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hilou A, Nacoulma OG, Guiguemde TR: In vivo antimalarial activities of extracts from Amaranthus spinosus L. and Boerhaavia erecta L. in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103: 236-240. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.006.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bopana N, Saxena S: Asparagus racemosus--Ethnopharmacological evaluation and conservation needs. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 110: 1-15. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.01.001.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sabir M, Bhide MK: Study of some pharmacological activities of berberine. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1971, 15: 111-132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lozano I: The therapeutic use of Cannabis sativa (L.) in Arabic medicine. J Cannabis Ther. 2001, 1: 63-70. 10.1300/J175v01n01_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    IUCN: National register of medicinal plants. 2004, Kathmandu: IUCN - The World Conservation Union

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wu JY, Zhang QX, Leung PH: Inhibitory effects of ethyl acetate extract of Cordyceps sinensis mycelium on various cancer cells in culture and B16 melanoma in C57BL/6 mice. Phytomedicine. 2007, 14: 43-49. 10.1016/j.phymed.2005.11.005.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kostova I, Iossifova T: Chemical components of Fraxinus species. Fitoterapia. 2007, 78: 85-106. 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.08.002.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li SL, Lin G, Chan SW, Li P: Determination of the major isosteroidal alkaloids in bulbs of Fritillaria by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with evaporative light scattering detection. J Chromatography A. 2001, 16: 207-214. 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01083-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ranjith A, Kumar SK, Venugopalan VV, Arumughan C, Sawhney RC, Singh V: Fatty acids, tocols and carotenoids in pulp oil of three Sea Buckthron species (Hippophae rhamnoides, H. salicifolia, and H. tibetana) grown in the Indian Himalayas. JAOCS. 2006, 83: 359-364. 10.1007/s11746-006-1213-z.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Erdemoglu N, Kupeli E, Yesilada E: Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity assessment of plants used as remedy in Turkish folk medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 89: 123-129. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00282-4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Comai S, Dall'Acqua A, Castagliuolo I, Gurung K, Innocenti G: Essential oil of Lindera neesiana fruit: Chemical analysis and its potential use in topical applications. Fitoterapia. 2010, 81: 11-16. 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.06.017.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Orhan I, Kupeli E, Sener B, Yesilada E: Appraisal of anti-inflammatory potential of the clubmoss, Lycopodium clavatum L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107: 146-150.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rao VS, Rao A, Karanth KS: Anticonvulsant and neurotoxicity profile of Nardostahys jatamansii in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 102: 351-356. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.031.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kim IH, Uchiyama N, Kawahara N, Goda Y: Iridoid glycosides and cucurbitacin glycoside from Neopicrorhiza scrophulariiflora. Phytochemistry. 2006, 67: 2691-2696. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.09.015.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yunlong X, Kubo I, Yunbao M: A cytotoxic flavanone glycoside from Onychium japonicum: Structure of onychin. Phytochemistry. 1993, 33: 510-511. 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85552-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Matsuda HP, Morikawa T, Kishi M, Kataoka S, Yoshikawa M: Protective effects of steroid saponin from Paris polyphylla on ethanol induced gastric lesions in rats: structural requirement for activity and mode of action. Bioorgan Med Chem Lett. 2003, 13: 1101-1106. 10.1016/S0960-894X(03)00052-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Watanabe T, Rajbhandari KR, Malla KJ, Yahara S: A handbook of medicinal plants of Nepal. 2005, Japan: AYUR SEED

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Tomczyk M, Latte KP: Potentilla - A review of its phytochemical and pharmacological profile. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 122: 184-204. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.12.022.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Reynolds JEF, (Ed): 1982, Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia

  69. 69.

    Yonzon M, Lee DJ, Yokochi T, Kawano Y, Nakahara T: Antimicrobial activities of essential oils of Nepal. J Essent Oil Res. 2005, 17: 107-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tse WP, Che CT, Liu K, Lin ZX: Evaluation of the antiproliferative properties of selected psoriasis treating Chinese medicines on cultured HaCaT cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108: 133-141. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.04.023.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Rajbhandari TK, Joshi NR, Shrestha T, Joshi SKG, Acharya B: Medicinal Plants of Nepal for Ayurvedic Drugs. 1995, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Department of Plant Resources

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Bharyava S, Rao PS, Bhargava P, Shukla S: Antipyretic potential of Swertia chirata Buch Ham. root extract. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2009, 77: 617-623. 10.3797/scipharm.0812-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Devkota KP, Acharya R, Baral MP, Adhikari RP: Antimicrobial activities of some herbal plants used in traditional medicine in Nepal. Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Science and Technology: 8-11 March 1999. 1999, Khumaltar, Nepal. Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, 1311-1317.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Chowdhury NI, Bandyopadhyay SK, Banerjee SN, Dutta MK, Das PC: Preliminary studies on the antiinflammatory effects of Swertia chirata in albino rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 1995, 27: 37-39.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Muhammad N, Khan I, Ahmad B, Ali T, Ahmad W, Choudhary MI: Antifungal and antibacterial activities of Taxus wallichiana Zucc. J Enzym Inhib Med Ch. 2008, 23: 256-260. 10.1080/14756360701505336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Anonymous: Medicinal Plants of Nepal for Ayurvedic Drugs. 1995, Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Chandramu C, Rao MD, Krupadanam DG, Reddy VD: Isolation, characterization and biological activity of betulinic acid and ursolic acid from Vitex negundo L. Phytother Res. 2003, 17: 129-134. 10.1002/ptr.1088.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Chaturvedi GN, Singh RH: Experimental studies on the anti-arthritic effect of certain indigenous drugs. Indian J Med Res. 1965, 53: 71-80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Taylor RSL, Shahi S, Chaudhary RP: Ethnobotanical research in the proposed Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale Rhododendron conservation area, Nepal. Vegetation and Society: Their interaction in Himalayas. Edited by: Chaudhary RP, Subedi BP, Vetaas OR, Aase TH. 2002, Tribhuvan University, Nepal and University of Bergen, Norway, 26-37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are thankful to the local people of the Rasuwa district, Nepal for their participation in the study and for sharing their valuable knowledge. We are also grateful to the Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR) of Belgium for providing financial support for this study, and to R. C. Poudel for providing a valuable contribution to the development of this study.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yadav Uprety.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

YU and SY carried out field research. EKB and KKS supervised the work. YU and HA analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

List of medicinal plants identified by

Additional file 1: Tamang people from the Chilime Village Development Committee of the Rasuwa district, Central Nepal. Contains a list of the medicinal plants identified in the present study by the Tamang people from the Chilime Village Development Committee of the Rasuwa district, Central Nepal. Plants are sorted by scientific name. For each plant, family name, vernacular name(s), life form, part(s) used, uses, and mode(s) of use are provided. (PDF 99 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uprety, Y., Asselin, H., Boon, E.K. et al. Indigenous use and bio-efficacy of medicinal plants in the Rasuwa District, Central Nepal. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 6, 3 (2010).

Download citation


  • Medicinal Plant
  • Medicinal Plant Species
  • Menstrual Disorder
  • Medicinal Formulation
  • Livelihood Improvement