Ethnozoological study of animals based medicine used by traditional healers and indigenous inhabitants in the adjoining areas of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 March 2017
Accepted: 18 June 2017
Published: 30 June 2017
India has an immense faunal, floral, as well as cultural diversity with many ethnic communities who are primarily dependent on the traditional medicinal system for their primary health care. Documentation and evaluation of this indigenous remedial knowledge may be helpful to establish new drugs for human health. The present study is intended to look into different zootherapeutic medicinal uses in the traditional health care system among the native inhabitants adjacent to the Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India.
Field survey was carried out from March 2015 to August 2015 by personal interviews through semi-structured questionnaires. In some cases where participants were uncomfortable with the questionnaires, informal interviews and open group discussions were conducted with a total of 62 indigenous respondents (43 male and 19 female) who provided the information regarding various medicinal uses of animals and their products (local name of animal, mode of preparation, application etc).
The study recorded a total of 44 different species, 44 genera and 36 families of animals which are used for the treatment of 40 different ailments. Insects occupied the highest uses (30.9%), followed by mammals (23.8%), fishes (16.7%), reptiles (11.9%), amphibians (7.1%), annelids (4.8%) and gastropods (4.8%). Further, some zootherapeutic animals i.e. cockroach (Periplaneta americana), praying mantis (Mantis religiosa) and earthworms (Metaphire houletti, Pheretima posthum) are used for the treatment of asthma, otorrhoea and cancer respectively.
The findings suggest that the traditional zootherapeutic remedial measures followed by the native people adjacent to Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary plays an important role in their primary health care. The documentation of this indigenous knowledge on animal based medicines should be very helpful in the formulation of strategies for sustainable management and conservation of bio-resources as well as providing potential for the novel drugs discovery.
KeywordsEthnozoology Zootherapy Traditional healers Fidelity level
Bioresources involving both plants and animals have been used in the indigenous healing practices by different cultures since ancient time [1, 2]. In modern society also traditional medicinal knowledge constitutes an important alternative in health care system. About 70–80% of the world rural population depends on traditional medicine for its primary health care . The percentage of the population using traditional medicines for primary health care is more (60–90%) in developing countries than that in developed countries (23–80%) . Around 60% of commercially available drugs are based on bioactive compounds extracted from natural resources traditionally used by various indigenous cultures around the globe . Although plants and plant derivatives have been used as a major constituent of traditional medicine, the identification of animal resources for medicinal cure is also important in human health care [1, 6].
Zootherapy is defined as healing of human ailments by using medicines prepared from different animals and/or animal derived byproducts . Zootherapy constitutes a significant substitute among many other known therapies practiced worldwide . In Latin America, 584 animals distributed in 13 taxonomic categories were recorded with traditional therapeutic medicinal value , while 283 animal species were reported to be used for the treatment of various ailments in Brazil . In Bahia, the Northeast State of Brazil, over 180 animal species were recorded for the treatment in traditional health care practices . The rural community in the semi-arid region of Northeastern Brazil were reported to use 51 animal species to treat different ailments . Toba (qom) communities of Argentine Gran Chaco region have been documented to use 72 animal species belonging to 52 families as a part of animal pharmacopeia . In Traditional Chinese medicine, more than 1500 animal species have been reported to be of some medicinal importance . A review on the global traditional use of primates reported the use of 110 species of primates belonging to 41 genera and 11 families in traditional folk medicine and in magic-religious rituals . Lev and Amar (2000) documented the use of 20 animal species as traditional drugs in Israel . Alves and Rosa (2007) recorded 138 animal species being used in traditional medicine to treat 100 illnesses by the fishing communities of the North and Northeastern regions of Brazil . An overview of the global traditional uses of reptiles revealed that at least 165 reptile species belonging to 104 genera and 30 families are used in traditional folk medicine around the world .
India has a great faunal diversity accounting about 10% of the reported biological species on the planet and ranks first place in terms of insects (54,600), followed by fishes (2546), aves (1232), reptiles (456), mammals (390) and amphibians (209) [18, 19]. Various zootherapeutic traditional medicines have been reported and documented in great historical books like Ayurveda and Charak Samhita in India. About 15–20% of the Ayurvedic medicines are based on animal derived substances . Different tribes and ethnic communities inhabiting in different parts of India have a rich knowledge about animals and their medicinal value for their primary health care needs . Therefore, it is utmost important to record the conventional indigenous knowledge of different ethnic communities as many rural communities are loosing their socioeconomic and cultural characteristics .
North-eastern region of India is inhabited by various ethnic groups and tribes with wide cultural diversity . As per 2011 census, the North-eastern region is inhabited by a total of 427 tribal groups which have their own traditional cultural identity. There are only a few reports available from the region about the use of animals in traditional medicine. The traditional methods of treating various ailments using 81 species of edible and therapeutic insects and 36 vertebrate species by the Nyishi and Galo tribes of Arunachal Pradesh were reported [24, 25]. Twenty-six animal species were reported for the treatment of different diseases like asthma, tuberculosis, rheumatic pain, paralysis, etc. by different Naga tribes of Nagaland . Recently, indigenous Khasi tribes of East Khasi hills district, Meghalaya were reported to use 13 animals against asthma, anemia, diarrhea, cough, fever etc. in their traditional zootherapeutic practices .
Among the eight Northeastern States of India, Assam is the second largest State having rich, unique ethnic and cultural diversity, richness in forest resources and wildlife sanctuaries. Many reports on the plant based traditional medicine used by the people of Assam have been documented . However, only a few reports are available on the study of zootherapeutic remedial uses. Thirty-four different animal species have been recorded for the treatment of 34 different ailments among Biate tribes in the Dima Hasao district of Assam . A total of 26 ethnomedicinal animals and animal products were accounted for the treatment of different diseases like jaundice, asthma, pneumonia, etc. among the indigenous inhabitants in adjoining areas of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India . Among Karbi community, a total of 48 different animals were reported to be used for different therapeutic purposes against various diseases like piles, cancer, tuberculosis, eczema etc. .
The knowledge on the use of different animals in traditional medicine by different ethnic communities is generally passed orally from one generation to another generation and this knowledge is sometimes lost with the death of the elderly knowledgeable person. Nowadays, Indian traditional knowledge system is fast eroding due to urbanization. So, it is vital to study and document the ethnobiological information regarding the therapeutic use of different animals in traditional medicine among different ethnic communities before the traditional cultures are completely lost .
Many studies have been undertaken on Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary related with the Hollock Gibbon conservation, faunal diversity and medicinal plants [33–35], however, there is no report available about its ethnozoological value utilized by the people inhabiting adjacent to this Sanctuary. Thus, the present study involving the documentation of traditional zootherapeutic medicinal remedies used by indigenous people inhabiting in the adjoining areas of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary was undertaken which may provide information in making strategies for sustainable utilization of natural resources and biodiversity and also protect traditional knowledge for future generation.
Socio-cultural diversity around gibbon wildlife sanctuary
Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary exhibits a great ethnic cultural diversity surrounded mainly by human settlement and tea gardens. The major ethnic communities inhabited adjacent to wildlife sanctuary are Ahom, Chutiya, Koch-Rajbonshi, Kalita and tea tribes (Adivasi). Ahom, Chutiya and Koch-Rajbonshi people belong to Mongoloid groups. However, Kalita community of Assam commonly claimed themselves to belong to the Kshatriya caste and they considered as pure Aryans and it was thought that they were the first to introduce the Aryan culture in Assam [37, 38]. The tea tribes of Assam (Adivasi) are the people who were brought to the State in the British era as workers in tea gardens by colonial tea planters. The community consists of people belonging to the indigenous tribal community like Munda, Santhal. Bhumiz etc. Although all these communities are from different origin, nevertheless they are patriarchal by nature and belong to Assamese and use Assamese scripts .
The present study was conducted in the villages surrounding the Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary and the information was collected mainly from the people of Ahom, Chutiya, Koch-Rajbongsi and Kalita communities.
Field surveys were conducted in villages surrounding Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary from March to August 2015. The ethnomedicinal data about the use of animals and their products were collected using the participatory rural appraisal (PRA) method, where the informants also sometimes become investigator themselves, involves an interview, informal meetings, open and group discussions and with semi-structured questionnaires [40–42].
During survey, details were asked in semi questionnaire form on the ethnozoological information, including local name of animal, part used, ailments, method of preparation, mode of administration, dosage, duration of treatment etc. concerning each of the traditional medicine [41–44]. The age of respondents varied from 30 to 80 years. A total of 62 individuals were interviewed. The respondents/informants were selected mainly on the basis of their experience, recognition as an expert knowledgeable persons, traditional healers concerning traditional medicine. Moreover, the detailed ingredients of medicine whether they use only animal parts or mixed with other ingredients like plant material were also noted. The scientific name and species name of animals were identified using relevant standard literature [45, 46] and also in association with Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Shillong.
Relative frequency of citation
Relative frequency of citation (RFC) index shows the local importance of each species. The RFC value was calculated using the formula RFC = FC/N; where FC is the number of informants mentioning about the use of the species and N is the number of informants participating in the survey . This RFC index varies from 0 to 1. When RFC index is 0, it means that no one refers to the animal as useful and when RFC index is 1, it indicates that all informants in the survey refer to the animal as useful .
Where Np is the number of informants that claim a use of a specific animal species to treat a particular ailment and N is the total number of the informants who utilized the animals as a medicine to treat any given disease.
Results and discussion
Demographic details of informants
Demographic profile of the informants included in survey (N = 62)
Number of people
Koch- Rajbangsi community
Age of traditional healer
Between 31 and 40 years
Between 41 and 50 years
Between 51 and 60 years
Between 61 and 70 years
Above 70 years
The age of the respondents varied from 31 to 80 years. The percentage of local medicinal practitioner with age lower than fifty was found to be very less with only 21% as compared to 79% of the aged group of society above 50 years (Table 1). The demographic table of the respondents showed that the aged groups of the society were more knowledgeable about traditional medicinal uses than that of younger generation. This trend was very similar to the observation in other region of Assam made by Verma et al.  and may also indicate that the aged people were more experienced in the zootherapeutical practices which were passed to them by their elders. The reason of less traditional medicinal knowledge among the younger generation could be due to urbanization and assimilation of alien culture.
Most of the respondents had secondary level education while some of them were up to graduation level (Table 1). Only 12 respondents (19.4%) were formally employed in government sector mainly as school teachers while others were mostly farmers, workers and local traditional healers. Most of the informants practiced this traditional therapy as a part time job to serve the society. However, some are renowned well known herbalist/healers who practice this traditional medicinal knowledge in large scale as their profession.
Medicinal uses of animals and animal parts for traditional therapeutic purposes by the people inhabiting adjacent area of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary
Scapteriscus borellii (Giglio-Tos, 1894) (IV)
Intestinal worm (thread worm)
Raw alimentary canal part is consumed
Lampyridae spp. (Latreille, 1817) (IV)
4/5 raw fire flies prescribed to eat daily
Periplaneta Americana (Linnaeus, 1758) (IV)
Wings are removed and washed, then boiled with water and prescribed to consume
Apis cerna indica (Fabricius, 1793) (IV)
Whole honey bee is ground in water and prescribed to eat.
Vespa affinis (Linnaeus, 1764) (IV)
It is ground and mixed with water and prescribed to drink
Myrmicaria brunnea (Saunders, 1842) (IV)
Prescribed to eat raw
Tetraponera rufonigera (Jordan, 1851) (IV)
Prescribed to eat raw
Green tree ant
Oecphylla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775) (IV)
Prescribed to eat raw
Prescribed to eat raw
Epistapix (bleeding from nose)
Ant is fried and prescribed to eat
Gundhi kira (Rice bug)
Leptocorisa varicornis (Fabricius, 1787) (IV)
Whole insect is boiled and prescribed to consume
Muga silk worm
Antheraea assamensis (Helfer, 1837) (IV)
Eat raw because of its high protein content
Acheta domestica (Linnaeus, 1758) (IV)
Fried and prescribed to eat
For better eye sight
Pheropsophus spp.(Solier, 1833) (IV)
Raw beetle is consumed
Mantis religiosa (Linnaeus, 1758) (IV)
Cocoon with larva
Otorrhoea (Wound in ear)
Cocoon with larvae is burned and ash is mixed with coconut oil and prescribed to apply in wounded area directly with feather
Insects are ground into powder and mixed with milk and prescribed to drink
Metaphire houletti (Perrier, 1875) (IV)
Pheretima posthum (Vaillant, 1868) (IV)
Vocal chord infection
Earthworm is washed properly and boiled with water, salt is added and prescribed to consume.
Head portion of earthworm is inserted in goroi fish after removing alimentary canal part and fried and prescribed to eat
Head portion is burned and grind to powder, then mixed with coconut oil and 4–5 leaves of Jetulipoka (Rubus rugosus Sm.) and a paste is made. Then the paste is prescribed to use externally in piles
Raw earthworm are squished and prescribe to consume
Perionyx spp. (Perrier, 1872) (IV)
3 earthworms are ground, then mixed with salt and prescribed to eat for 2 days twice a day
Cryptozona bistrialis (Beck, 1837) (IV)
Impotence (to increase sexual power)
Boiled and prescribed to eat
Pila spp.(Roding, 1798) (IV)
For better eye sight
Raw snail is eaten
Soft watery portion
Applied externally for massage
Common tree frog
Polypedates leucomystax (Gravenhorst, 1829) (V)
Meat is boiled with spices like Clove, Cinnamon, black pepper and prescribed to eat
Bufo spp. (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
heart with blood
Bronch pneumonia (bolianerengia)
Fresh blood and heart mixed with clove, cardamom, pepper a paste is made and prescribed to consume
Ranna spp. (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Meat is cooked and prescribed to eat
Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) (V)
Gall bladder (Bile)
Ground with water and prescribed to eat whole thing
Clarias batrachus (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Cooked with spices like black pepper and prescribed to eat
Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794) (V)
Cooked with spices like black pepper and prescribed to eat
Amphipnous cuchia (Hamilton, 1822) (V)
Whole body and blood
Raw blood is prescribed to drink and cooked meat is prescribed to eat
Assamese snake head
Channa stewartii (Playfair, 1867) (V)
Boiled in water and consumed
Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton, 1822) (V)
Cooked fish is prescribed to eat
Chaca chaca (Hamilton, 1822) (V)
Dry fish is grind and prescribed to drink with water
Indian rat snake
Ptyas mucosa (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Pain or body ache
Cooked meat is prescribed to eat
Common Indian skink
Eutropis carinata (Schneider, 1801) (V)
Snake bite and pain
It is boiled in water and after boiling water portion is prescribed to drink
Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1802) (V)
Skin disease (ring worm)
Boiled meat is prescribed to eat.
Indian wall lizard
Hemidactylus flaviviridis (Ruppell, 1835) (V)
Lizard meat is inserted in banana for easy swallowing and prescribed to eat
Ophiophagus hannah (Cantor, 1836) (V)
bile /gall bladder
Raw bile/gall bladder is prescribed to eat.
Herpestes edwardsii (Saint-Hilaire, 1818) (V)
Meat is boiled and prescribed to eat
Sciurus caroliniensis (Gmelin, 1788) (V)
Boiled meat is prescribed to eat
Bos indicus (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Skin cancer (anduriya)
250 ml of curd with juice from the roots of Hun borial plant (Sida cordifolia L.) and sira of bakul bora rice prescribed to take for 3 days
Milk is mixed with juice of Sotiona plant (Alstonia scholaris L.) leaf and bark and prescribed to take for 3 days.
Epilepsy (Mrigi bemar)
Cow urine is mixed with crushed seed of Bokful (Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Pers.) and prescribed to drink
Bubalus bubalis (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Pre menstrual pain
After burning of buffalo horn the ash is mixed with water and prescribed to drink
Hystrix indica (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Pre menstrual pain
alimentary canal is dried and ground and then mixed with water and prescribed to drink
Rucervus duvaucelii or Cervus duvaucelii (Cuvier, 1823) (V)
Horn of dear is burned and the smoke is used in piles region
Indian fruit bat (vesper bat)
Pipistrellus coromandrs (Gray, 1838) (V)
Blood is prescribed to drink to stop vomiting
Pteropus gigantus (Brunnich, 1782),
Rhinolophus spp. (Lacepede,1799) (V)
Meat is cooked and prescribed to eat
Vulpes bengalensis (Shaw, 1800) (V)
Cooked meat is consumed
Homo sapiens (Linnaeus, 1758) (V)
Prescribed to drink human urine
Urine is used as antiseptic in wound
The use of a number of animals and animal derived drugs by different ethnic communities to treat different diseases have also been reported from different geographical regions in India. A total of 15 different animal species were reported to be used for therapeutic purposes by the Mogya, Bawaria, and Meena community of Rajasthan . About 26 animal species were reported to be used by the Naga tribe of Nagaland  and 48 different animals were recorded and documented to be used for different ethnomedicinal purposes among the Karbis of Assam . Different indigenous tribal groups also sacrifice animals for different rituals and religious purposes in keeping with their mythological myths and beliefs. For example, people wear bear and tiger claws around their neck to protect from evils while animals like goat, buffalo, pigeon were sacrificed to please Gods for healing purposes [54–56].
From the study conducted, treatment was found for assisting 40 different ailments such as asthma, pneumonia, cancer, fever, piles, gastric, diabetes, snake bite, Pox, otorrhoes etc. (Table 2). The use of whole animals for medicinal purpose was recorded to be the highest (44.9%), followed by other animals parts and byproducts like meat (22.5%), blood, head, alimentary canal, gall bladder/bile, urine, horn, milk (each 4.1%) and heart, cocoon with larva (each 2.0%).
Relative frequency of citation (RFC)
Relative frequency of citation (RFC) index was calculated to determine the local importance of each species. The most cited animal species were: Metaphire houletti/Pheretima posthum (RFC = 0.68), Pteropus gigantus/Rhinolophus sp. (RFC = 0.66), Amphipnous cuchia (RFC = 0.66), Periplaneta Americana (RFC = 0.65), Clarius batrachus (RFC = 0.59), Pila spp. (0.58), Vulpes bengalensis (0.52). The highest value of RFC index was scored by Metaphire houletti/Pheretima posthum which demonstrates the importance of this animal species in adjoining areas of Gibbon wildlife sanctuary, Assam, India as it was mentioned by a higher number of informants. However, animal species with low RFC values for instance Hemidactylus flaviviridis (RFC = 0.02) and Pherosphus sp. (RFC = 0.02) do not mean that they are not important locally but it may be that the most of the people are not aware of their therapeutic properties.
Fidelity level (FL)
Fidelity level is very helpful for identifying most frequently and preferably used species in the treatment of certain disease. This fidelity level varies from 1.0% to 100% on the basis of respondents claiming the use of certain animals for the same purpose. A higher FL of 100% or close to 100% for a specific animal indicates that all of the used reports mentioned the same method for using the animal for treatment for the same diseases . The present study showed 5 animal species with a FL above 90% (Table 2, Sl. No. 3,10,15, 24,41) such as Perplaneta americana which are used for the treatment of asthma (FL ~ 92.3%), Perionyx sp. used for treatment of pneumonia (F L ~ 95.2%), Amphipnous cuchia for treatment of anemia (FL ~ 90.9%), Vulpes bengalensis used for treatment of paralysis (FL ~ 91.3%) and Antheraea assamensis used as food for highly proteinacious contents with a FL 100%. However Pherosophus sp. has the lowest fidelity level (FL ~ 6.9%). Observably, the remedies for frequently reported ailments have the maximum fidelity level and those with less number of reports have lowest FL values. From this study, the results indicate that in many cases same animal species were reported to be used for the healing of more than one ailment. This type of trends has also been found in different traditional medicinal remedies in different parts of the world [14, 23, 44, 67]. On the other hand, different animal species were sometimes used to treat the same disease. The use of different animals or remedies for the same ailment is popularly valued as it provides an adaptation to the availability and accessibility of the possible animals .
Use of animals and animal derived products for indigenous medicinal purposes in the study site is the main primary health care system. This study is the first effort to document the traditional zootherapeutic knowledge common among the indigenous inhabitants surrounding Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary. Traditional knowledge is not only significant for its pharmacological value, but also related with different cultural beliefs and sentiments of the indigenous people. This study provides the base for further scientific validation of the therapeutic efficacy of various zootherapeutic tradiotional uses by these people and finding novel biological compound(s) towards discovery of new drugs. This may also help in better understanding of traditional zootherapeutic medicine, its interrelationship with the socioeconomic and ecological values of the region, biodiversity conservation and management strategies of animal resources for sustainable use.
We are grateful to all the respondents (traditional healers) of the surrounding areas of Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary for sharing their valuable traditional knowledge and the forest officials for their support and help during the field survey.
The significance of this first ethnozoological study in this specified region and components of the work including questionnaire etc. were conceptualized by SBP. Necessary ethnozoological field surveys by collecting data through personal interaction/interviews/semi-structured questionnaire in the adjoining areas of Gibbon wildlife sanctuary of Assam were done by MPB. Preparation of graphs, tables, statistical analysis and initial manuscript preparation were done by MPB. Compilation of data, analysis and interpretation of data was done jointly by both the authors. Further corrections, scrutiny and critical appraisal of the manuscript was done by SBP. We take the responsibility for the integrity of the work presented in this manuscript. Both the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The detail of the work plan of present ethnozoological study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, North-Eastern Hill University Shillong, Meghalaya, India. Participants were given an explanation of the aims, methodology and outcome of the study and the consent was obtained verbally before the interview was conducted.
Consent for publication
Consent to publication of any picture, included in the paper has been obtained from the study participants.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Alves RRN, Rosa IL. Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicine? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005;1:1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vijaykumar S, Yabesh JEM, Prabhu S, Ayyanar M, Damodaran R. Ethnozoological study of animals used by traditional healers in the silent vally of Kerala. India J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;162:296–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. Guideline on the conservation of medicinal plants. Geneva: 1993. p. 1–38.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. Traditional medicine strategy 2014–23. 2014. p. 1–76.Google Scholar
- Crag GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: a continuing source of novel drugs leads. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta. 2013;180:3670–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa-Neto EM. Animal-based medicines: biological prospection and the sustainable use of zootherapeutic resources. Annals Acad Bras Cienc. 2005;77:33–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa-Neto EM. Healing with animals in Feira de Santana city. Bahia Brazil J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;65:225–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Alves HN. The faunal drugstore: animal-based remedies used in traditional medicines in Latin America. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:1–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Santana GG. The role of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. Bio Sci. 2007;57(11):949–55.Google Scholar
- Costa-Neto EM. Implications and applications of folk zootherapy in the state of Bahia. Northeastern Brazil Sustain Dev. 2004;12(3):161–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Barbosa JAA, Santos SLDX, Souto WMS, Barboza RRD. Animal based remedies as complementary medicines in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2009:1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez GJ. Use of fauna in the traditional medicine of native Toba (qom) from the argentine gran Chaco region: an ethnozoological and conservationist approach. Ethnobio Conserv. 2013;2:1–43.Google Scholar
- China National Corporation of Traditional and Herbal medicine. Materia medica commonly used in China Beijing. China Beijing: Science Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- Alves RRN, Souto WMS, Barboza RRD, Bezerra DMM. Primates in traditional folk medicine: a world overview. Mammal Rev. 2010;40:155–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lev E, Amar Z. Ethnopharmacological survey of traditional drugs sold in Israel at the end of the 20th century. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;72:191–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Rosa IL. Zootherapeutic practices among fishing communities in North and Northeast Brazil: a comparison. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111:82–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Vieira WLDS, Santana GG. Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv. 2008;17:2037–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alfred JRB. Faunal diversity in India: an overview Faunal Diversity in India, vol. I-VIII; 1998. p. 1–495.Google Scholar
- Puri SK. Biodiversity Profile of India (Text Only). 2007. http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/cesmg/indiabio.html. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
- Unnikrishnan PM. Animals in Ayurveda. J Amruth. 1998:1–15.Google Scholar
- Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP. Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008;4:17–29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Alonso-Castro AJ. Carranza-Alvarez C, Maldonodo-Miranda JJ, Jacobo-Salcedo MDR, Quezada-Rivera, Lorenzo-Marquez H, Figueroa-Zuniga LA, Fernandez-Galicia C, Rios-Reyes NA, de Leon-Rubio MA, Rodriguez-Gallegos V, Medellin-Milan P. Zootherapeutic in Aquismon, San luis Potosis, Mexico. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;138:233–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teron R, Borthakur SK. Biological motifs and designs on traditional costumes among Karbis of Assam. Indian J Trad Knowl. 2012;2:305–8.Google Scholar
- Chakravorty J, Ghosh S, Meyer-Rochow VB. Practices of entomophagy and entomotherapy by members of the Nyshi and Galo tribes, two ethanic groups of the state of Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011a;7:5–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chakravorty J, Meyer-Rochow VB, Ghosh S. Vertebrate used for medicinal purposes by members of the Nyishi and Galo tribes in Arunachal Pradesh (North-East India). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011b;7:13–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jamir NS, Lal P. Ethanozoological practice among Naga tribes. Indian J Trad Knowl. 2005;1:100–4.Google Scholar
- Turnia I, Prasad SB. Traditional zootherapeutic practices by the indigenous Khasi natives of Sohiong village, East Khasi hill district, Meghalaya. India Asian J Complement Altern Med. 2017;2017(1):1–8.Google Scholar
- Sajem AL, Gossai K. Traditional use of plants by the Jaintia tribes in North Cachar Hills district of Assam, northeast India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Betlu ALS. Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use among the Biate tribe of Dima Hasao District, Assam. Northeastern India J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:56–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borah MP, Prasad SB. Ethnozoological remedial uses by the indigenous inhabitants in adjoining areas of Pobitora wildlife sanctuary, Assam. India. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;8(4):90–6.Google Scholar
- Verma AK, Prasad SB, Rongpi T, Arjun J. Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy) by the major ethnic group of Karbi Anglong district of Assam. India Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6:1–8.Google Scholar
- Trivedi PC. Ethnobotany: an overview. In Ethnobotany edited by: Trivedi PC. Jaipur: Aavishkar publisher; 2002.Google Scholar
- Chetri D, Chetri R. Hoolock gibbon conservation in India. Gibbon J. 2011;6:7–12.Google Scholar
- Devi OS, Saikia PK. A checklist of avian fauna of gibbon wildlife sanctuary, Jorhat District. Assam NeBIO. 2010;1(3):1–7.Google Scholar
- Sarmah R, Saikia A. Folklore medicine practiced by traditional healers of fringe village of gibbon wildlife sanctuary, Assam. India Acta Biomedica Scientia. 2016;3(4):227–33.Google Scholar
- Gogoi P. Gibbon wild life sanctuary: a prospect for eco-tourism. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2013;4(10):549–59.Google Scholar
- Baruah L. Cultural assimilation among Ahom, Chutiys, Kachari, Mishing, Rabha and Deoris ethnic communities of Assam. BEST: IJHAMS. 2014;2(7):59–64.Google Scholar
- Ray NR. Koch Rajbonshi and Kamata puri. Centre for Koch Rajbonshi Studies and Development (CKRSD), Guwahati. 2013.Google Scholar
- Sengupta S. The Tea Labourers of North-East India: An Anthropo-historical perspective. Mittal publication, New delhi (India). 2009; p.1–295.Google Scholar
- Kim H, Song MJ. Analysis and recordings of orally transmitted knowledge about medicinal plants in the southern mountainous region of Korea. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;134:676–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huntington HP. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:1270–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alexiades MN. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. In: advances in economic botany. Volume 10. The New York Botanical Garden: Bronx; 1996.Google Scholar
- Morvin Yabesh JE, Prabhu S, Vijaykumar S. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by traditional healers in Silent Valley of Kerala. India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;154:774–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jain SK. Dictionary of Indian folk medicine and Ethnobotany. New Delhi: Deep Publisher; 1991.Google Scholar
- Ali S. The book of Indian birds. Bombay. Natural History Society: Bombay; 1996.Google Scholar
- Prater SH. The book of Indian animals. Bombay Natural History Society. 1996;Google Scholar
- Vitalini S, Iriti M, Puricelli C, Ciuchi D, Segale A, Fico G. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val san Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)- an alpine ethnobotanical study. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;145:517–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mootsamy A, Mahomoodly MF. A quantitative ethnozoological assessment of traditionally used animal based therapies in the tropical island of Mauritius. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;154(3):847–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friedmen J, Yaniv Z, Dafni A, Palewitch D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmocological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev desert. Israel J Ethnopharmacol. 1986;16:275–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP. Traditional knowledge on zootherapeutic uses by the Saharia tribe of Rajasthan. India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Feijo A, Barboza RRD, Souto WMS, Fernandes-Ferreira H, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Langguth A. Game mammals of the Caatinga biome. Ethnobio Conserv. 2016;5:1–51.Google Scholar
- Fernandes-Ferreira H, Mendonca SV, Cruz RL, Borges-Nojosa DM, Alves RRN. Hunting of herpetofauna in montane coastal and dryland areas of northeastern Brazil. Herpetol Conserv Bio. 2013;8:652–66.Google Scholar
- Kakati LN, Doulo V. Indigenous knowledge system of zootherapeutic use by Chakhesang tribe of Nagaland. India J Human Ecol. 2002;13(6):419–23.Google Scholar
- Mahawar MM, Jaroli DP. Animals and their products utilized as medicine by the inhabitants surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park. India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:46–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solanki GS, Chutia P. Ethno-zoological and socio-cultural aspects of Monpas of Arunachal Pradesh. J Human Ecol. 2004;4:251–4.Google Scholar
- Alves RRN. Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:1–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Song MJ. Ethnozoological study of medicinal animals on Jeju island. Korea J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146:75–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jaroli DP, Mahawar MM, Vyas N. An ethanozoological study in the adjoining areas of Mount Abu wildlife sanctuary. India J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2010;6:6–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benitez G. Animal used for medicinal and magico-religious purposes in western Granada Province. Andalusia J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:1113–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Filho GAP. Commercialization and use of snakes in North and northeastern Brazil: implications for conservation and management. Biodivers Conserv. 2007;16:969–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa-Neto E, Oliveira MVM. Cockroach is good for asthma: zootherapeutic practices in northeastern Brazil. HER. 2000;7:41–51.Google Scholar
- Mishra N, Panda T. Zootherapeutical uses of animal diversity in coastal district of Orissa. India Br J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2011;2:154–8.Google Scholar
- Lohani U. Zootherapeutic knowledge of two ethnic populations from Central Nepal. EthnoMed. 2012;6:45–53.Google Scholar
- Jo M, Park MH, Kollipara PS, An BJ, Song HS, Han SB, Kim JH, Song MJ, Hong JT. Anticancer effect of bee venom toxin and melittin in ovarian cancer cell through induction of death receptor and inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;258:72–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang FX, Guo B, Wang HY. The spermaticidal effects of earthworm extract and its effective constituents. Soil Biol Biochem. 1992;24:1247–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dinesh MS, Sridhar S, Chandana PG, Pai V, Geetha KS, Hegdge N. Anticancer potentials of peptides of coelomic fluid of earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2013;10:601–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira FS, Brito S, Ribeiro S, Almedia W, Alves RRN. Zootherapeutics utilized by residents of the community Poco Dantas, Crato-CE. Brazil J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:21–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alves RRN, Rosa IL. From cnidrians to mammals: the use of animals as remedies in fishing communities in NE Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107(2):259–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar