- Open Access
Plants for making wooden bowls and related traditional knowledge in the Gyirong Valley, Tibet, China
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine volume 18, Article number: 13 (2022)
The wooden bowl is an important symbol of the Tibetan cultures, yet, in China, little has been documented regarding the raw materials used to make these items as well as their cultural significance in Tibet. This study explores the ethnobotanical uses of plants used to make wooden bowls to understand their sustainability, cultural significance, and current status of related traditional knowledge in Gyirong Town, which is one of the most famous places for wooden bowl making.
Materials and methods
Between 2019 and 2021, key informant interviews, semi-structured interviews, and participatory observations were used to conduct ethnobotanical field surveys in Gyirong Valley. The field work was performed with the assistance of local guides. In this study, we utilized a use-report (UR) to reflect the number of mentions of a species by locals.
Our results show that 16 different plants are used during the wooden bowl making process, of which nine are used as raw materials, three for dyeing, and four for varnishing. Although communities rely heavily on these plants, good management and collection methods were observed. We also documented the use of Fallopia denticulata as a red dye and four species of Impatiens as wood varnishes for the first time.
The wooden bowl craftsmen and their housewives have a wealth of traditional knowledge of using plants to make wooden bowls in Gyirong Town. And the wooden bowls are now also offering benefits to the locals as well. The government and local people are committed to the protection and development of traditional knowledge related to wooden bowls, and this knowledge maintains a healthy degree of vitality. This research can provide insights into the vitality of traditional handicrafts that are facing challenges and promote their protection.
The technique, artistic value and cultural connotation contained in handicraft products are all important aspects of intangible cultural heritage . The handicraft industry also plays a vital role in generating income and employment [2, 3] and is recognized as a tool for poverty reduction worldwide. Indeed, in many developing countries, the handicraft industry is an important income sector second only to agriculture ; however, the handicraft industry faces some challenges, such as industrialization and globalization . Moreover, due to the lack of sufficient data on handicraft practices, this sector remains at a disadvantage [5, 6], which hinders protection measures .
As an important representative of China’s intangible cultural heritage, traditional handicrafts of China are facing the risk of being lost due to the influence of modernization and industrialization . Many plants are used as raw materials or auxiliary materials in the process of traditional handicraft making. Several ethnobotanical studies consider traditional handicrafts of use within their results, at the same time there are many anthropological and historical documents that mention them. A group of scholars from Beijing documented the traditional bamboo weaving plants and related knowledge of the Lhoba people in Milin, Tibet and the Miao people in Sanshui, Guizhou [8, 9]. And bamboo weaving has played a role in poverty alleviation in some place . Kang et al. documented 84 wooden plant species for variable purpose in the Qinling mountains, China . And some valuable species were usually selected use. Some plants that dye handicrafts (mostly cloth) were also documented [8, 11, 12]. The Yi people living in Liangshan, Sichuan, use Oxalis corniculata to scrub, de-tarnish, and polish the silver jewelry of traditional attire . In China, wooden handicrafts are usually coated with lacquer produced by Toxicodendron vernicifluum to achieve aesthetics and protection .
Tibetans are one of 56 ethnic groups in China and have lived in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region for generations. In history, Tibet has three cultural regions (Kham, Ü-Tsang, and Amdo Tibet) . The use of wooden bowls by Tibetans has a long history and is one of the necessities of Tibetan life, now an important symbol of Tibetan culture . These wooden bowls made in many places, but regions in Cuo na, Jia cha, Gyirong, and Cha yu are particularly well known for their bowl-making skills. The craftsmanship in Gyirong and Cha yu wooden bowls has led to their recognition as a type of regional intangible cultural heritage of Xizang . Wooden bowls are an indispensable part of Tibetan life and an important source of income for local Tibetans. Some studies mentioned the local names of the plant used to make the wooden bowl, while specific scientific names have not been documented [18, 19]. Huang describes that the coloring and lacquering of Tibetan wooden bowls generally involve the juice of “jia-yu-cao” as dye, which grows in mountainous areas .
The Tibetans speak the Ü-Tsang dialect in Gyirong Valley, and they are famous in the nearby area for processing wooden bowls. However, there are no listed plants for which data have been published for use as wooden handicrafts, wood coloring, and wood varnish. Building on this sparse information, we aimed to (1) document the traditional Tibetan plants and knowledge of wooden bowl makings in Gyirong Town, (2) explore the cultural significance of these plants in Tibetan traditional customs, and (3) explore whether there has a change in the utilization of plants used to make wooden bowls? Compared to the past, what changes happened to? (4) What is the local Tibetan traditional way of collecting and managing the plants for making wooden bowls?
Materials and methods
Gyirong Town is known as the “Back Garden of the Himalayas” and is located in the core area of the Everest National Nature Reserve to the south of Shigatse City in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China (Fig. 1). The total population of the town was 3946 in 2017, and the main ethnic group is Tibetan. In Daman Village of Gyirong, there are still more than 200 Daman people. Their main production practice is to produce iron tools and sell them to the surrounding Tibetans, and they don't know how to make wooden bowls. This area has a subtropical monsoon climate with an annual average temperature of 10–13 °C (temperatures during the warmest months exceed 18 °C), an annual precipitation of 230–370 mm, and more than 200 frost-free days annually. Gyirong Town is dominated by low altitude forest dominated by Pinus wallichiana, P. roxburghii, Picea smithiana, Tsuga dumosa, Betula utilis, Abies spectabilis, Sabina chinensis, and Cuculus spp. This rich forest resource provides sufficient raw materials for traditional wooden bowl makings. The work report of the Gyirong Town People’s Government from 2016 to 2020 pointed out that during this period, Gyirong Town focused on carrying out more than 1500 forest fire prevention patrols. At the same time, it strengthened the management of handicraft and gathering industries to prevent the occurrence of random logging and digging. The traditional production practices of the Gyirong Tibetans are agriculture and grazing. The main crops are Hordeum vulgare, Solanum tuberosum, Fagopyrum tataricum, rapeseed. The traditional diet of the Tibetans in Gyirong is mainly tsampa, dairy products, and butter tea.
The Gyirong Valley has been an important communication channel between China and South Asian countries since ancient times. It can be said that the Valley has filled half of the history of Tibet. In 633 AD, Princess Chizun of Nepal entered Tibet from here when she married Tubo Zanpu Songtsen Gampo. During the Tang Dynasty of China, there was the official route of ancient Chinese envoys to South Asian countries. In 789 AD, Gyirong has become an important channel for exchanges and trade between Tibet and Nepal . Therefore, Indian and Nepalese styles can still be observed in some temple buildings. Until now, the Tibetan of Gyirong Valley still maintains the traditional customs of transnational trade and intermarriage.
Between 2019 and 2021, key informant interviews, semi-structured interviews, and participatory observations were used to conduct ethnobotanical field surveys. To help understand the traditional knowledges of different stakeholders associated with Gyirong wooden bowls, three students and 20 housewives from the traditional handicraft families, 24 craftsmen (also a merchant, as the wooden bowls are sold directly from home to tourists) and four wooden bowl merchants who only sell wooden bowls and do not process were selected as key informants. The age of the informants ranged from 19 to 87. The “snowballing” method was used to identify the wooden bowl craftsmen, and random interviews were conducted of the students, housewives and merchants. A total of 51 informants (27 men and 24 women) were interviewed (Table 1), all of whom provided informed consent before the interviews. Informants of different genders and ages were selected. Due to relatively poor levels of education, most local people, especially community elders, could not communicate fluently in Chinese. Therefore, fieldwork was conducted with the assistance of local guides. The key informant and semi-structured interviews were conducted based on the following questions: (1) What tree can be used to make wooden bowls? (2) Which tree is the best? and why? (3) What plant do you use to dye the wooden bowls? (4) What plant do you use to varnish the wooden bowls? And why? (5) Do these plants or wooden bowls have any special meaning or symbolism? (6) has there been a change in the utilization of plants used to make wooden bowls ( such as the plant species, the parts used)? Compared to the past, what changes happened to? During the semi-structured interview, after asking the set questions, we also ask about management, selection, historical changes, and other relevant information according to the actual interview situation. The basic information of the plants, such as the vernacular name, the use part, and the use method, was documented during the semi-structured interviews.
During the field surveys, with the help of key informants and local guides, we collected plant specimens according to the principle that one venecular name corresponds to one plant specimen. Permissions to take samples were always obtained from the informants and relevant local community departments. The specimens were identified and preserved in the herbarium of the Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KUN), and the attributed scientific names were checked using “The Plant List.” . As Gyirong Town is located on the Chinese border and the scope of activities during the COVID-19 pandemic is restricted, we did not collect a voucher specimen of long-xin. But according to the information described by the informants: this tree is very similar to tang-xin (P. wallichiana) and grows in lower altitude areas, so we speculate that long-xin may be the dominant species (P. roxburghii) in the low-altitude vegetation of Gyirong Valley. Except for this species, specimens of other species are collected and kept in the Kunming Herbarium.
We adopted the use report (UR) as ethnobotanical index. A use report (UR) is the specific use of a species cited by an informant . The number of UR can reflect the number of mentions of a species by locals.
Results and discussion
Plants used for manufacture wooden bowls in the different stages
In total, this study documented 16 plants belonging to 11 families and 13 genera being used at different stages of Gyirong wooden bowl processing (Table 2). Their vernacular names, parts used and use reports for all species mentioned by different gender were documented. In Table 2, we present the number of plants used in the wooden bowl-making process mentioned by people of different occupations. Among them, there are nine species used as wood materials, three species used to make dyes, and four species used to make varnishes. It is worth noting that the four Impatiens species have only one vernacular name, which may be related to the use of the Impatiens seeds. These surveys demonstrate the diversity of plants utilized in the process of making wooden bowls and also reflect the complexity of wooden bowl making in Gyirong Town.
According to Table 2, we described the plants used in the making of wooden bowls mentioned by people of different occupations. Betula utilis D. Don, Juniperus tibetica Kom., and Rheum australe D. Don were mentioned by the informants of the four occupations. Berberis xanthophlaea Ahrendt was mentioned by one student but not by the merchant. This may be because the students were involved in the process when their parents used the plant to dye yellow. And craftsmen have no access to this process. Apart from the four plants described above, the students and merchants did not provide information on any other plants used in the making of the wooden bowls. The reason may be that (1) these four kinds of plants are the most commonly used plants in making wooden bowls, so they are well known by everyone, even if they are not professional wooden bowl craftsmen; (2) students and merchants are rarely involved in the making of wooden bowls. For plants as wood materials, Himalayacalamus falconeri (Hook.f. ex Munro) Keng f., Larix potaninii var. himalaica (W. C. Cheng & L. K. Fu) Farjon & Silba, and Salix trichocarpa C. F. Fang were mentioned only by craftsmen. For plants as dyes and varnishes, both housewives and craftsmen mentioned them. The reason may be that the craftsmen are the main finishers in the whole process of making the wooden bowls, and the housewives are the auxiliary roles. Therefore, the relevant traditional knowledge about making wooden bowls is mainly concentrated on craftsmen and housewives. Students and merchants know only common plant species.
Plants as a source of wood
Through our interviews and fieldworks, we identified nine plant species (eight family and nine genera) used as wood for making wooden bowls in Gyirong Town (Table 2). All of these species were the dominant local vegetation types, indicating the sufficient availability of raw material resources. Due to the diversity of the wood nature of plants, they are chosen by people for different purposes . The quality of the wooden bowls produced using the different plants varies, with local people showing some particular preference. The URs of different occupations reflect the local people’s understanding of different species of wood (Table 2). For example, Betula utilis was mentioned by people of all occupations because its wood does not crack or discolor, and the more that B. utilis bowls are used, the redder their color becomes. In contrast, bowl made using Rhododendron arboreum, which was mentioned only by housewives and craftsmen easily, deform over time. Because of the hardness of its wood, Quercus semecarpifolia, which was also mentioned only by housewives and craftsmen, is relatively difficult to work with, and the resulting bowls easily crack (Table 2). Due to the rarity of wooden bowls made by H. falconeri, a bowl can fetch around $3000. Also such differences between species, wooden bowls made from different parts of the same plant, can have different properties, which is reflected in their monetary value. For example, a bowl made from wood obtained from a tree trunk costs approximately $10, while a bowl made from burl wood can sell for $200–400. Indeed, burls are considered the best source of wood for bowl making by local Tibetans as these tend to produce items with the most beautiful patterns. But the value of wooden bowls made of burls from various trees is also different. The bowls made of B. utilis burls are the best and can sell for the highest price. Bowls made of B. utilis burls are called “cha-bo-luo” meaning they can last a lifetime; “cha-bo-luo” bowls are considered the best dowry and betrothal gifts, cherished carefully look after by their recipients. These specific types of bowls are also one of the most valued blessings passed between parents and their children for a happy life (Table 3).
Plants used as a source of dyes
In Tibet, wooden bowls are dyed in yellow and red, having the meanings of good luck and happiness, respectively (Fig. 2). In Tibetan Buddhism, yellow represents the flourishing land, and red often represents fire as well as being a symbol of power. Typically, the Rheum australe rhizomes are used by locals in Gyirong to produce yellow dyes. And the barks or roots of Berberis xanthophlaea can also be used to produce yellow dyes (Table 4). First, the R. australe rhizomes are harvested from the fields, then the hull of the rhizomes is removed, and the remaining parts are directly used or sun-dried for later use (because these plants are often used for dyeing, it is too troublesome to collect if they are used). When you need to make dye solution, put fresh or dried rhizomes into boiling water about 30 min. After the dye solution has cooled, place the unfinished wooden bowls completely in the dye solution for about 30 s. Finally, the dyed bowl needs to be sun-dried. The process of dyeing yellow using the barks or roots of B. xanthophlaea is the same as for R. australe. Moreover, the used dye liquor should be kept for next use. If the concentration of the dye liquor next time is not enough, the corresponding plants can be added to increase the concentration. There are differences in the importance of plants that are used to dye the same color. Locals prefer to use R. australe which was mentioned by people of all occupations to dye yellow rather than B. xanthophlaea (in addition to craftsmen, people in other occupations mention this plant) (Table 2). The reason is because the local people think that the yellow dyed by R. australe is mixed with a faint red, while the yellow dyed by B. xanthophlaea is pure yellow. They prefer colors mixed with a faint red. Rhizomes of R. australe and Fallopia denticulata are used together to make red dye solution in the same way (Table 4). The concentration of the dye solutions depends on the type and color of the wood. For example, some wood (B. utilis) is “white”, requiring a higher concentration dye solution, while some types of wood are already “dark” in color and require a lighter dye solution. Notably, we made the first observation of F. denticulata being used for producing a dye. While traditional wooden bowl makers still use these dying methods, many others now use industrial dyes. In Gyirong, the yellow color of traditional Tibetan wooden bowl is still achieved using plant-based dyes, surviving as a deeply rooted cultural practice.
Plants used as varnishes
The term varnish refers to “a liquid that dries into a transparent film when applied to a solid surface” . Wood varnishes not only protect the wood from weathering, abrasion, and environmental humidity fluctuations, but also have a certain decorative aesthetic function [23, 24]. In Gyirong, Impatiens falcifer, I. bicornuta, I. sulcata, and I. scabrida are used by locals to produce natural varnishes or lacquers (Table 4). These species were first documented to be used as varnishes. Of which the leaves of I. sulcata are edible, and the seeds can be eaten raw and processed into vegetable oils. Moreover, it is also used medicinally . I. scabrida has medicinal and environmental uses . At the beginning of October each year, the local people collect mature Impatiens spp. seeds, dry them, grind them, and coat the pre-dyed wooden bowls with the resulting oils. There was no difference in the utilization of the seeds of the four species of Impatiens, either separately or together. This process needs to be repeated at least three or four times. A similar process is reported to have been used for more than 7000 years in Chinese culture [26, 27]. China usually uses lacquer produced by T. vernicifluum to protect traditional wooden handicrafts . The traditional wooden bowl lacquers used in the Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province, and Tibet region of China mainly consist of raw lacquer and tung oil purchased from the surrounding Lisu people . Although lacquer-containing T. acuminatum and T. wallichii are found around the Gyirong Valley, they are not used by the locals . This may be because local people wish to highlight the yellow and red dyes applied to their traditional bowls, and “raw lacquer” has quite a deep color; the natural dyes can be obscured by the color of the raw lacquer, with ancient Chinese lacquer mostly black and vermilion . The unsaturated fatty acids content of I. balsamina seed oil is 70.75%, including 16.50% linoleic acid and 31.47% α-linolenic acid . These substances penetrate into the wood, having a moisturize a preservative effect that highlights natural texture similar to Wood Wax Oil, which is 90% unsaturated fatty acids [31, 32]. Therefore, Impatiens varnish or lacquer is favored over that produced from Toxicodendron by the traditional wooden bowl makers in Gyirong.
Process of the production of the bowls
The wooden bowl production process is complicated, involving a series of steps: including material selection, airing, carving, dying, and varnishing (Fig. 3). According to our interviews and observations, it took several days to select the materials (Fig. 3a), and the raw materials required two or three months of airing before being used. Family members or relatives accompany wooden bowl-maker up the mountain to select and collect wood materials. The selected wood is then cut into a bowl shape with a knife. Rapeseed oil should be brushed over the bowl embryo. And it must also be placed in a place without direct sunlight but with adequate ventilation for a period of time in order to volatilize the moisture from the wood (Fig. 3b). The purpose is to prevent the bowl embryo from cracking. After that, rough processing is required. It takes about four hours to make a bowl (Fig. 3c, d). The most important part is the machining process, which necessitates the use of a variety of engraving tools. To begin, use a knife with a wider blade to trim the bowl embryo into the shape of a bowl, while the wood turner is rotating and then using a thinner blade to trim the details (Fig. 4). The knife used on the outside of the bowl is not the same as the one used on the inside (Fig. 4). Then, depending on different demands, dye the bowl in various colors (Fig. 3e, f). After dyeing, it must be sun-dried, and the surface of the bowl must be smoothed with sandpaper. Finally, grind the sun-dried Impatiens seeds and spread them on the bowl’s surface, repeating this process at least 3–4 times per bowl (Fig. 3e). The purpose of this process is to protect the bowl while also bring out the color and texture of the wooden bowl. In the end, a wide variety of wooden products is completed (Fig. 3h). Of course, certain wooden bowls can be used without being dyed or varnished.
Harvesting practices for wooden bowl making and local management
Non-timber forest products provide a variety of cultural and economic values for those ethnic groups that depend on forests [22, 33]. However, whether target species for cultural and economic use can be managed sustainably remains a matter of debate. This includes Juniperus Tibetica (VU), which the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has classified as a vulnerable species . During our interviews, we learned about the forest management practices of the local people, which follow a general set of collection guidelines for Betula utilis, the most-used species in the area. Notably, local people believe that dead trees are the best raw material. For example, an earthquake that occurred on April 25, 2014, destroyed many B. utilis that were subsequently used to make wooden bowls. Harvesting time is also crucial, with the wood collected before the rainy season to preserve the valued patterns in the wood. These practices can be thought of as a sustainable management in Gyirong, much like “thinning” in other managed forests . The impact of tree plants that used as handicraft materials to their populations may be low, because such activities are traditionally selective . For other trees, locals tend to use wood with Burls, because the trunks of these trees make poor bowls. Also, removing the burls will not affect the growth of the trees. Furthermore, in recent years, the local government has stipulated that it is forbidden to fell certain tree species, including J. tibetica, and others can only be cut down three days of these year. This policy is generally implemented by the Chinese government throughout the country in order to protect forests . During the interviews, the informant also reported that J. tibetica was less commonly used to process wooden bowls compared to before.
For dyed plants, the parts utilized (roots, tubers, bark) are all important parts of plant growth. Usually, locals go to the mountains to collect these plants after the leaves have fallen off. In their conception, the leaves absorb nutrients from the roots or rhizomes. After the leaves fall off, nutrients gather on the roots or rhizomes, and the dyed color is better. Also, current-year plants are usually not on their radar. Therefore, we speculate that this process has little impact on the natural population of the three dyed plants. Because the seeds of these plants have been dispersed after the leaves have fallen, the current-year plants are also preserved. According to our field observations, the number of wild individuals of these three plants is relatively abundant. However, the specific effect needs further experimental verification. The part of plant used as varnishes is seed. The fruit of Impatiens is a fleshy, explosive capsule; seeds often dispersed elastically from valves when ripe. Therefore, some seeds “escape” when they are collected. There were many Impatiens plants around the house. We also observed very rich natural populations during field work. But as local people use the seeds more and more, the impact on the natural populations of these plants requires further observation.
Changes of varnish plants and wooden bowl handicraft industry respond to the market strategy
Traditional knowledge is often holistic and adaptive, gathered by generations of observers whose lives depend on this information and its use . As an embodiment of the relationship between humans and biota, plant utilization fully reflects and supports the characteristics of culture, ideology and technology that existed at any given time in human history . The process of re-selection and use of Impatiens plants by the Tibetans of Gyirong are a good example of this relationship. In the past, Gyirong wooden bowls were mainly produced in Naixia Village and were used by Tibetans in nearby towns and villages. With the development of society and tourism, Gyirong wooden bowls have become well known for their high quality and low price, and their demand is increased rapidly as a consequence. Due to the low yields of Impatiens seeds and the complicated processing procedures, traditional natural lacquer has been gradually replaced by modern industrial varnishes for over the past 30 years. However, commercial varnishes have one serious disadvantage. Although these varnishes can be easily purchased and application is relatively simple, they retain a pungent smell for a long period, which can have some health risks. In Gyirong, attempts are made to remove this smell by soaking the varnished wooden bowls in wine made from highland barley for half an hour, although this does not completely remove the smell. Perhaps most crucially, varnishing wooden bowls with commercial varnishes do not appear to improve sales. In contrast, a wooden bowl cooperative has been recently organized by the local people to promote the use of the original Impatiens-based wood varnish. This has been favored by tourists, and sales have increased significantly as a result both in self-operated and online stores. As such, Impatiens species in this area are more than just a traditional natural varnish or lacquer plant, but demonstrate the ability of local Tibetans to respond and adapt to the market strategy. Such response and adaptation rely on locally accumulated traditional knowledge .
In addition, according to the local craftsmen, there has been poor demand for ordinary wooden bowls over the last few decades, with generally poor profits as a result. Fewer local people make these items as a result, with many more choosing to seek work elsewhere. In the past, wooden bowls were only the processes in Nai village. Then, in 2008, the traditional wooden bowl-making process was selected, under the organization of the Gyirong Government, to be included on the Tibet Autonomous Region Intangible Cultural Heritage List . At the same time, some people in other villages began to learn traditional techniques from their elders and more began to process and sell wooden bowls. More recently, the Gyirong Town Government has helped farmers and herdsmen register 51 professional cooperatives, including 12 processing and manufacturing cooperatives. This has helped spread traditional knowledge about wooden bowl making from Nai to other villages. In addition, the popularization of tourism and e-commerce has increased demand for these items. Villages with good tourism benefit from the wholesale of wooden bowls from Nai Village and Zha Village, further broadening the sales channels. Currently, craftsmen can earn up to $4000 each year from selling traditional wooden bowls, which are often made outside of the farming season. This additional income has become a powerful tool for local poverty alleviation.
Multiple challenges such as industrialization and globalization affect the development of handicraft industries worldwide [5, 39]. With the encouragement of the government, the local wooden bowl handicraft has shown a strong vitality in Gyirong Town. In addition, the local people in Gyirong are resilience to the rapid changes occurring around them, such as the use of four species of Impatiens for producing varnishes. Gyirong Town has rich forest resources. With the strong support of the government, the sustainable collection and utilization of wood bowl-related plants can promote the development of wood bowl handicraft industry and increase the income of local people.
We studied the plants used in traditional Tibetan wooden bowl making in Gyirong Town, China, which included nine species belonging to nine genera. One of these species, Juniperus tibetica (VU), is identified as vulnerable by the IUCN. Betula utilis D. Don is the most commonly used species for bowl making because of its excellent characteristics. Bowls made from B. utilis burls are called “cha-bo-luo”, which are highly valued as dowry and betrothal gifts. The wooden bowls are dyed in yellow and red, signifying good luck and happiness, respectively. Yellow dyes are made from Rheum australe and Berberis xanthophlaea, and R. australe and Fallopia denticulata are used to make red dyes. Impatiens falcifer, I. bicornuta, I. sulcata, and I. scabrida are also used as varnish by the Tibetans in Gyirong. This is the first document of F. convolvulus being used to make red dye, and the first time these four species of Impatiens has been documented for use as wood varnishes.
We found that the wooden bowl craftsmen and their housewives have a rich traditional knowledge of using plants to make wooden bowls in Gyirong Town. Despite the fact that these plants are heavily relied upon by communities, good management and collection procedures were observed. The development of local plant resources can not only ensure a steady supply of raw materials for wooden bowls and maintain traditional handicraft industries, but also increase income. Notably, the continued use of Impatiens seed oils as varnishes over commercially available varnishes serves to demonstrate the resilience of these local communities and their traditional crafts. In the face of industrialization alongside the adaptability of local craftsmen and their wider communities, government support and guidance are highlighted as powerful tools to help protect and develop this fragile intangible cultural heritage. This case study provides inspiration for traditional handicrafts that are facing challenges elsewhere.
Availability of data and materials
Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.
Xu TY. 非物质文化遗产保护背景下中国传统手工艺的传承与发展 [Inheritance and development of Chinese traditional handicrafts under the background of intangible cultural heritage protection]. Light Text Ind Tech. 2020;49(6):3. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-0101.2020.06.023.
Jones E, Smith S, Wills C. Women producers and the benefits of collective forms of enterprise. Gender Dev. 2012;20(1):13–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/23408745.
Fatt BS, Bakansing SM. An alternative raw material in handicraft-making by using the oil palm fronds: A community based tourism exploratory study at Kota Belud. Sabah Tour Leis Glob Change. 2014;1:25–37.
Paige RC. Profiles of successful craft micro-retailers. J Dev Entrepreneurship. 2009;14:393–412. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946709001326.
Barber T, Krivoshlykova M. Global market assessment for handicrafts, vol 1. Washington, DC: USAID; 2006. 1–78.
Rogerson CM. The enterprise of craft: constraints and policy challenges in South Africa. Acta Acad. 2010;42(3):115–44.
Grobar LM. Policies to promote employment and preserve cultural heritage in the handicraft sector. Int J Cult Policy. 2017;2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1842382.
Luo BS, Ahmed S, Long CL. Bamboos for weaving and relevant traditional knowledge in Sansui, Southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00418-9.
Li FF, Zhuo JX, Liu B, Jarvis D, Long CL. Ethnobotanical study on wild plants used by Lhoba people in Milin County. Tibet J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0009-3.
Kang J, Kang YX, Feng J, Liu MY, Ji XL, Li DW, et al. Plants as highly diverse sources of construction wood, handicrafts and fibre in the Heihe valley (Qinling Mountains, Shaanxi, China): the importance of minor forest products. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0165-8.
Fan YX, Zhao YQ, Liu AZ, Hamilton A, Wang CF, Li LQ, et al. Indigenous knowledge of dye-yielding plants among Bai communities in Dali, Northwest Yunnan, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0274-z.
Li S, Cunningham AB, Fan RY, Wang YH. Identity blues: the ethnobotany of the indigo dyeing by Landian Yao (Iu Mien) in Yunnan, Southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0289-0.
Wang J, Seyler BC, Ticktin T, Zeng YG, Ayu K. An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants used by the Yi people of Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0349-5.
Hu G, Long CL. The ethnobotany and developmental strategy of “Ba Qi.” Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2007;6:66.
Gayden T, Bukhari A, Chennakrishnaiah S, Stojkovic O, Herrera RJ. Y-chromosomal microsatellite diversity in three culturally defined regions of historical Tibet. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6(4):437–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.09.002.
He M, He JB. 论滇川藏交界地藏族木碗文化的变迁[On the changes of wooden bowl culture of Tibetans in the junction of Yunnan, Sichuan and Tibet]. Acad Explor. 2015;000(002):78–83. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-723X.2015.02.013.
The People’s government of Tibet Autonomous Region. 西藏自治区第二批区级自治区级非物资文化遗产名录[The second batch of intangible cultural heritage of the Tibet Autonomous Region]. http://minzunet.cn/eportal/uipageId=663068&articleKey=766671&columnId=765264. Accessed 15 Sept 2021.
Chen LM. 藏族饮料与饮具的历史与现状考察 [A survey on the history and present condition of Tibetan drinks and kitchenware]. J Southwest Univ Nationalities (philos soc sci) 23 (3): 18–21
Huang AH. 藏族的茶炊茶具 [Tibetan tea-urn and Kitchenware]. J Aba Teach Coll. 2008;25(1):33–6.
ZhangYF. 千年吉隆 [Millennium Gyirong]. China Tibetology Publishing House; 2006.
The Plant List. Version 1.1. Published on the internet. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 1 Nov 2021.
Kufer J, Forther H, Poll E, Heinrich M. Historical and modern medicinal plant uses-the example of the Ch’orti’ Maya and Ladinos in Eastern Guatemala. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005;57(9):1127–52. https://doi.org/10.1211/jpp.57.9.0008.
Gilani MS, Pflaum J, Hartmann S, Kaufmann R, Baumgartner M, Schwarze F. Relationship of vibro-mechanical properties and microstructure of wood and varnish interface in string instruments. Appl Phys A. 2016;122(4 pt. 1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9670-1.
Yalinkilic MK, Ilhan R, Imamura Y, Takahashi M, Demirci Z, Yalmkilic AC, Peker H. Weathering durability of CCB-impregnated wood for clear varnish coatings. J Wood Sci. 1999;45(6):502–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00538961.
Diazgranados M, Allkin R, Black N, Cámara-Leret R, Díaz-Rueda DM. World checklist of useful plant species. Produced by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity; 2020.
Shen H. Textual research of China coatings 7000 years history. China Coat. 2011;26(1):65–8. https://doi.org/10.13531/j.cnki.china.coatings.2011.01.017.
Sung M, Jung J, Lu R, Miyakoshi T. Study of historical Chinese lacquer culture and technology—analysis of Chinese Qin-Han dynasty lacquerware. J Cult Herit. 2016;21(14):889–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.004.
Zheng JM. 西藏的漆树 [Lacquer trees in Tibet]. J Chin Lacquer. 1982; 1: 6–10. https://doi.org/10.19334/j.cnki.issn.1000-7067.1982.01.003.
Fang J. The study of function and cultural connotation of lacquer in ancient China. J Chin Lacquer. 2017;36(3):14–21.
Wang FC. 凤仙花籽油脂肪酸组分分析 [Fatty acid compositions of Impatiens balsamina Linn seed oil]. China Oils Fats. 2008;208(06):78–9.
Nussbanm RM, Stucliffe EJ, Hellgren AC. Microautoradiographic studies of the penetration of alkyd emulsion and linseed oil coatings into wood. J Coat Technol. 1998;70(3):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697811.
Huang YH, Feng QM, Dong TY, Ye CY, Li F. Brief analysis of the application research status and development tendency of wood wax oil. China For Prod Ind. 2019;46(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.19531/j.issn1001-5299.201901002.
Ticktin T. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. J Appl Ecol. 2004;41(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3505876.
IUCN 2021. The IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2021-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 10 Oct 2021.
Russell ES, Liu H, Thistle H, Strom B, Greer M, Lamb B. Effects of thinning a forest stand on sub-canopy turbulence. Agric For Meteorol. 2018;248:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.019.
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(5):1251–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641280.
Bates DM. Plant utilization: patterns and prospects. Econ Bot. 1985;39(3):241–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02858794.
Ohmagari K, Berkes F. Transmission of indigenous knowledge and bush skills among the western James Bay Cree women of subarctic Canada. Hum Ecol. 1997;25(2):197–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021922105740.
Yang Y, Shafi M, Song X, Yang R. Preservation of cultural heritage embodied in traditional crafts in the developing countries. A Case Study of Pakistani handicraft industry. Sustainability. 2018;10(5):1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051336.
We are very grateful to the informants for sharing their knowledge with us. We thank Professor Pei Shengji for technical guidance. In addition, we thank Mr. Xu Haikun as auto drivers in the wild works.
The study was funded by “the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (No. 2019QZKK0502)”.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors asked for permission from the local authorities and the people interviewed to carry out the study.
Consent for publication
The people interviewed were informed about the study’s objectives and the eventual publication of the information gathered, and they were assured that the informants’ identities would remain undisclosed.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xiao-Yong Ding and Chang-An Guo: co-first author.
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, XY., Guo, CA., Hu, HB. et al. Plants for making wooden bowls and related traditional knowledge in the Gyirong Valley, Tibet, China. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 18, 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00514-y
- Traditional handicraft
- Wooden bowl