Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical investigation of medicinal plants in Buska Mountain range, Hamar district, Southwestern Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Despite the fact that ethnobotanical studies have been conducted in various parts of Ethiopia, compared with the existence of the multitude and diverse ethnic groups and their associated traditional knowledge, the studies are not comprehensive enough for all the localities and communities in the country. This is also true for the Hamar community of Southwestern Ethiopia, who are totally dependent on plants and plant products for their livelihood. Hence, this investigation was done to identify and record medicine plants and the native wisdom of the community in the area.

Methods

Three hundred twenty six (326) informants were selected from the 12 lowest governmental units (Kebeles) applying Cochran’s formula through stratified random sampling technique. From the total informants, 74 (48 males and 26 females) were purposively selected for in-depth discussion. Semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, guided field walks as well as market surveys were used for data collection. Standard ethnobotanical analytical tools comprising ranking and comparison were used for the analysis. Preference ranking, pair-wise comparison, informant consensus factor, direct matrix ranking, Cultural Significance Index (CSI) and Jaccard’s similarity coefficient (JCS) as well as Analysis of Variances (ANOVA), applying SPSS (version 20) were computed.

Results

A total of 145 species practical to cure about 72 ailments of livestock and humans were recorded. Families Fabaceae (with 22% of species), Asteraceae (11%), and Lamiaceae (9%) were discovered as the most dominant families in the area. Shrubs contributed the most (40%) to the growth forms followed by herbs (26.5%). Fresh leaves of the plants were parts that are used most frequently in the area. The highest ICF value (0.94) was recorded for reproductive problem categories. There was a relatively very high dependence of the community on plants and plant products together with a hoarded indigenous knowledge in the area that positively correlated with age (r = 0.82).

Conclusion

The study's findings revealed that Buska Mountain range is a home for highly diverse and most dependable plant species and associated indigenous knowledge. However, because of the realized environmental threats in the area, the conservation efforts of the community should be invigorated and supported in order to sustain the biodiversity in general and the medicinal plant species in particular.

Introduction

Over centuries, indigenous peoples from various parts of the world have established their own unique knowledge of plants which are relatively closer to their natural and agricultural environments [1, 2]. Uses of plants for food, household, utensils, medicine, building, clothing, magic, rituals, firewood, musical instruments, pesticides, shelter, cosmetics, divination, dyeing, textiles, tools, ornamentation, currency, and social life are all investigated in ethnobotany [3,4,5].

Ethnobotanical assessment of medicinal plants aims to explore and document a society's knowledge pertinent to traditional utilization of medicinal plants in their cultural settings [1, 6]. The world health organization [7] defined traditional medicine as health practices approaches, knowledge, and beliefs that include plant, animal, and mineral-based medicines, spiritual therapies, manual techniques, and exercises that are used singly or in combination to treat, diagnose, and prevent illnesses, as well as to maintain well-being. Indigenous peoples, particularly in developing countries, rely on plants for food, medicine, energy, and material culture [8]. Traditional medicine comprised of therapeutic practices that have been in existence for hundreds of years, before the development and delivery of modern medicine and are in use today [9]. However, current rises in population growth resulted in extensive forest clearing for expansion of agriculture in marginal areas, and hence lead to a subsequent loss of important plants in the wild and their associated knowledge [10]. The traditional medicine use customs of the communities may vary greatly based on the social and cultural heritages of the nations.

The Ethiopia’s geographical position, complex topography, environmental heterogeneity, ecological conditions, range of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems offered suitable environment for a wide range of life-forms [11,12,13]. As a result, Ethiopia is home to a diverse range of languages, cultures, and beliefs, all of which have contributed to the diversity of traditional knowledge and practices of the people, as well as distinct ways of utilizing the country's flora [14, 15]. In the country, almost 80% of the human population and 90% of livestock rely on plant products for medicine, which are culturally rooted in all communities [16]. Because of the numerous circumstances including accessibility, economic availability, cultural acceptability and efficacy, medicinal plants are in use for millennia across various communities. Several tribal groups in Ethiopia have fascinating traditions that are based in large part and rich in plant knowledge. Communities of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists on dry land area, in particular, have the indigenous knowledge needed to use plant products for medicine, economic, cultural, and environmental purposes [17].

It is particularly relevant to the people in the South Omo Zone, who are fully reliant on plants and plant products for human and livestock. Specifically, the ethnobotanical practice of Hamar community in the Buska Mountain range has remained the least explored for scientific study due to the remoteness of the area and arid climatic conditions. The community is exclusively dependent on plants and plant products, though the ethnobotanical documentation is yet scant. As a result, this study was conducted with the following specific objectives: (1) to investigate the distribution, abundance and taxonomic diversity of medicinal plants (2) to document the traditional medicinal plants lore of the Hamar community and (3) to determine the threating factors to medicinal plants in the area.

Methods and materials

Study area

The Hamar district is one of the eight districts in South Omo Zone, with coordinates ranging from 5° 12′ 40ʺ N latitudes and 36° 20′ 10ʺ E longitude. It borders to north by the Bena-Tsemay district, to the west by the Nyangatom district, to south by the Dasenech district, and to the east by the Borena rangeland of the Oromia region. The research location is at about 880 km south of Addis Ababa (Capital City of Ethiopia). The altitudinal range of the districts varies from 380 m.a.s.l. in the Erbore lowland to 2100 m.a.s.l. at the Peak of Buska Mountain (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Ethiopia showing the vegetation of Buska Mountain range and the study sites

The Hamar are the most populous ethnic groups in the Omo and Woito Rift Valley Mountain ranges. They are linguistically and culturally related to tribes from the northern mountains such as the Ari, Banna, and Bashada (unpublished report of the agricultural bureau of Hamar district, 2019). The Hamar people are well-known for their unique ivangadi dancing and bull jumping (locally called Ukuli-bulla) ceremony (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A ivangadi dancing, B being accompanied for the bull jumping and C Ukuli-bulla (the bull jumping ceremony of Hamar tribes) (photo by Melese Bekele, 20 March 2019)

About 95% of the district’s coverage has arid and semi-arid climatic conditions, with highly variable mean annual precipitation of 757 mm and an average annual temperature of 22.7 °C. The district has a bimodal rainfall pattern, with the main rainy season occurring between March and May and a shorter rainy season occurring between September and October (Fig. 3). The district experiences a longer dry season from the beginning of November to the end of February. Whereas the average monthly maximum temperature of the hottest month and the average monthly minimum temperature were 33.2 °C and 14.2 °C, respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Climate diagram of the study area from 1999 to 2019

Ethical consideration

The Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management (Addis Ababa University) wrote the official letter outlining the purpose of the study. As a result, the South Omo Zonal and the Hamar district officials were notified, and they forwarded information about the study's objectives to the community leader (Bitto), requesting his consent. The community leader has had a thoughtful discussion with the investigator about the study's intentions. The information was then relayed to the respective local leaders by the community leader in order to obtain permission. They scheduled the investigator to return in a week for the next trip, giving them enough time to discuss and decide whether or not to carry out the action.

A week later, the investigator returned to the research site and held a detailed discussion on the purpose of the study, explaining the significant reasons for data collection with the assistance of a native translator (Hamar Apho journalist), and finally, verbal consent was obtained (Fig. 4). Then and there, they recognized the investigator as their intimate, locally known as “Misso,” meaning “friend,” by the blessings of the elders (Donza) and inviting the interesting traditional music of the community's youngsters as well as a lovely cultural beverage of the community called ‘Farsi,’ which was made of sorghum(Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Discussion with a community leader (A), with respective local leaders (B), traditional song (C) and being invited ‘Farsi’ (D) (Photo by Melese Bekele, 15 December 2018)

Site selection

A reconnaissance inspection was conducted from 10–29 November 2018 to gain a general understanding of the biophysical and accessibility of the mountain range vegetation, interaction with surrounding communities, and indigenous knowledge-practice-belief systems in the area.

Based on scouting data, the twelve (12) lowest administrative units (locally known as Kebeles/Tsinti in the Hamar language) were prioritized and chosen based on their proximity to the vegetation as well as the community's interaction with the natural vegetation. As a result, the Kebles, namely Gedbak, Lala, Zegerma, Bonkole lagi, Bonkole cherkeka, Kufar, Achikunbulti, Shanko, Dimeka Zuriya, Wero, Dega Keja, and Erbore, were purposefully chosen for the study.

Informant selection

A total of 326 informants were selected using Cochran’s (1977) formula as:

$$n = \frac{N}{{1 + N\left( e \right)^{2} }}$$

where n = sample size; N = total number of households in sample villages/Kebeles (1748); e = maximum variability or margin of error 5% (0.05) and 1 = the probability of event occurring.

Based on [18], stratified random sampling was used to select general informants and purposive sampling approaches were used to select key informants. Background information of the respondents, including (age, gender, ethnicity, language, religion, and occupation); experience with medicinal plant use, health problems encountered, diagnosis and treatment, the local name of medicinal plants used, growth form, part used, methods of preparation and application, threats to medicinal plants, and conservation practices were meticulously recorded. The age of informants in the study ranges from 20 to 88 years old and classified in to three categories: young (20–35) years old, middle (36–65) years old, and elders (66 and above) years old. Out of the total informants, 74 (48 males and 26 females) were key informants chosen from all Kebeles purposively with the help of the Kebele administrators, personnel in the Agriculture and Rural Development Office of the study Kebeles and peer- recommendations of the local community leaders based on [18]. Interviews and discussions were conducted in the Hamar Language (Hamar Apho), as it is most popularly spoken language in all the study villages (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of households and informants in each Kebele

The interviewed number of informants from each Kebele was based on the proportion of households in each Kebele by using the formula:

$${\text{No of informants from each Kebele}} = \frac{{{\text{No of households in each Kebele}} \times {\text{total No of informants}} }}{{\text{ Total No of households}}}$$

Data collection

Following [18, 19], six different field visits within (March 1–30, 2018; December 1–30, 2018; April 1- 30, 2019; August 1–30, 2019; February 1–30, 2020; and December 1–30, 2020) were conducted to collect ethnobotanical data. During the collection, different seasons and yearly rainfall status were taken in to consideration as factors that can affect the vegetation over the course of the field visits. Semi-structured interviews, detailed discussion with knowledgeable informants, focus group discussions, a guided field walk, and a market survey were all carried out to collect the required ethnobotanical data and the associated indigenous knowledge as well as the management status together with major conservation threats in the area.

Twelve independent focus group discussions were held following Martin's [18] to gain additional information on plant use knowledge and to validate the data collected through semi-structured interviews. As a result, each group had 12 members (six from each Kebele involving four males and 2 women) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Focus group discussions (Photo by Melese Bekele, 10–20 August 2019)

Guided field walks were conducted in assistance with a field guide, who knows the local culture and language/Hamar Apho journalist/from the South Omo Zone and three key informants from each Kebele in order to obtain essential ethnobotanical explanations about the plant species as well as to gather plant specimens by recording all the necessary information of the particular plant species (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The key informants explaining the source, parts used and methods of preparation of traditional medicines in guided field walk (Photo by Melese Bekele 10, February 2020)

Similarly, six market observations were made following [19]; in each field visit, interviews were conducted with open market sellers and buyers of plants and plant products to collect qualitative and quantitative data (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Verbal interviews being conducted with open market sellers (Photo by Melese Bekele, within market visits from March 2018 to December 2020)

Specimen identification

The collected specimens were properly pressed, numbered, dried, and transported to Addis Ababa University, Ethiopian National Herbarium (ENH) for further taxonomic identification to species level using the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea, as well as by comparison with the preserved authentic specimens in the herbarium. Then the identified specimens were checked and confirmed by the research Supervisor (Professor Sebsebe Demissew/the Professor of Plant Systematics and Biodiversity). Moreover, the secured voucher specimens with all necessary information were deposited at the herbarium.

Analysis of the data

The composed data were summarized and organized based on [18] in such a way that can be articulated in terms of percentages and proportions computed during analysis. The relative local and cultural importance of the species cited by the informants for different major use categories besides the medicinal uses were also prioritized and quantified following [20, 21]. Both quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods were employed for preference ranking, fidelity level index (FL), informant consensus factor (ICF), paired comparisons. Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity, and direct matrix ranking applied following [18, 22] to compute and evaluate the levels of importance of one plant species over the other. Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (Spss, I., 2011), was used to display ANOVA of correlation model for ethnobotanical knowledge and age categories. The Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity was computed to comprehend the degree of species similarity with various other related studies conducted in Ethiopia.

Preference ranking

Following [18], a preference ranking was computed for the most commonly reported medicinal and other use categories of the community. As a result, the preference ranking of eight plant species used against the area's most commonly reported cattle disease and the most prevalent human disease were determined. Similarly, the preference of ten plant species used for local house construction, seven plant species for timber production, six plant species for wild food, eight plant species for forage/fodder, six plant species for shade, and six plant species for honey production were ranked by the number of purposefully selected key informants. This helps to indicate the rank order of the most preferred plants used by the community for the evaluated use.

Direct matrix ranking

For eight multipurpose plant species chosen from medicinal plant species data, a direct matrix ranking was performed based on the evidence gathered from informants. Eight purposely selected key informants were enquired to rate eight different types of uses, including fodder, food, firewood, construction, bee forage, furniture, shade and charcoal production, assigning use values of each attribute (5 = best, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = less, 1 = least used, 0 = not used). Based on data obtained from informants, the average value of use diversity for each species was taken and finally, the values of each species were summed up and ranked.

Paired comparison

Paired comparison analyses were performed on traditionally important medicinal plant species for treating the area's most common problem of humans and livestock. The other was on the plant species used to make the most popular tool known as Borkota, which is usually found in the hands of Hamar males and is used to seat whenever necessary or to get rest lying supported their neck and head by it during tired walking a long distance on foot (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Showing the use of Borkota (Photo by Melese Bekele, 10 December 2020)

Accordingly, eight key informants were selected and responded independently for seven traditionally important plants species selected for treating the snake poison and the values were summarized. Similarly, five highly cited plant species were evaluated by eight key informants to indicate the community’s preference of plant species used to make Borkota in the area.

Informant consensus factor

The agreement of people across different medicinal plants as well as the most popular plant species used for other purposes was tested by calculating informants consensus factor (ICF) following [23]. Accordingly, the ICF on medicinal uses of different plant species was calculated as: a number of use records in each type (nur) minus the used species number (nt), divided by the amount of use citations in each type minus one [24]. The factor delivers an array of 0 to 1, where a high value considered as an indicator for a high rate of informant consensus.

$${\text{ICF}} = \frac{{n_{{{\text{ur}}}} - n_{{\text{t}}} }}{{n_{{{\text{ur}}}} - 1}}$$

where ICF = Informant Consensus Factor, nur = number of uses citation of each category, nt = the used species number.

However, some of the limitations of this method were taken in to consideration as it does not distinguish degrees of importance and analyzes only the average number of cited uses. Consequently, a plant having two listed purposes but rarely used could be considered as more "important" than a very popular plant with only one use.

Fidelity level index

Fidelity level is useful for identifying the key informants’ most preferred species used for treating certain ailments. The medicinal plants that are widely used by the local people have higher FL values than those that are less popular. Fidelity level shows the percentage of informants claiming the use of a certain plant species for the same major purpose. This is designed to quantify the importance of the species for a given purpose. As a result, fidelity level index was quantified for ten medicinal plant species commonly used to treat the most common problem (rabies) in the area.

$${\text{FL}} = Np/N\quad {\text{or}}\quad {\text{FL}}\% = Np/N \times 100$$

where FL = Fidelity Level and FL%, the percentage fidelity level, Np = the informants number who independently suggested the application of one species for similar major purpose, and N = the informants number who stated a species for any use.

This index could be articulated in percentage, that value close to 100% (1) showing that almost all the uses mentioned refer to the same purpose (the plants and their use for a particular purpose are most preferred), whereas low FLs are generally obtained for plants that are used for many different purposes. In other words, it is believed that medicinal plants that are frequently used to treat the same type of ailment are more likely to be biologically active. However, due to the complexity of cultural and pharmacological realities, fidelity level may not adequately capture a proxy for effectiveness or even new drug discovery.

Cultural Significance Index (CSI)

The index of cultural significance calculates the importance of the plant species through the researcher-determined weighted ranking of multiple factors [25]. Then [26] has assigned scores on a five-point scale to the variables of quality and intensity of use and allocated a score of two, one, or 0.5 for the exclusivity or preference of use. However, [25] revised the approach with a two-point scale for the variables to reduce the subjectivity. The revised method also assimilated a consensus technique called a correction factor to decrease the sensitivity of the technique to sampling intensity. The ethnographic, qualitative method of the CSI technique needs considerable experience and understanding with a cultural assembly for meaningful results. The Cultural Significance Index, based on [25] computed as:

$${\text{CSI}} = \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {i*e*c} \right)*{\text{CF}}$$

where i = species management [managed (2) or non-managed (1)], e = Use preference [preferred (2) or not preferred (1)], c = Use frequency [frequently used (2) or rarely used (1)], CF = Correction factor [the number of informant citations for a given species divided by informant number records for the most cited species]. The subjective allocation methods can save time in the field and provide a more refined dataset than the “uses totaled” method. However, these methods introduce researcher bias because degrees of importance and categories are based solely upon researcher assessment. Furthermore, as with other methods in this category, informant responses are not independently recorded, thus eliminating the opportunity for analysis of informant variability.

Jaccard coefficients of similarity (JCS)

The Jaccard’s similarity coefficient was computed to determine the species similarity in composition with five other studies done in different part of the country. The JCS was calculated using the formula:

$${\text{JCS}} = \frac{c}{{\left( {a + b + c} \right)}}$$

where JCS is the Jaccard’s Coefficient of similarity, a is the number of species in habitat A (in Buska Mountain range), b is the number of species in habitat B (in other study areas), and c is the number of common species occurring in habitat A, and B. The percentage JCS is obtained by multiplying by 100. Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 [27], was used to display analysis of variance (ANOVA) of correlation model for ethnobotanical knowledge and age categories.

Result

Agro-ecology and socio-demography of the study area

Pastoralism and semi-pastoralism are the two main land use systems in the study area. Communities residing in relatively lowland areas, where crop cultivation is extremely difficult due to harsh climate conditions, rely on pastoralism. The bulk of the villages we visited as a result, such as Erbore, Degakeja, Wero, Zegerma, Kufar, Gedbak, Bonkolelagi, and Bonkolecherkeka, where there are pastoralist communities that only relied on the mixed livestock products (cattle, goats, and sheep). In contrast, people who live in comparatively highland regions like Lala, Achikunbulti, Shanko, and Dimeka zuriya are semi-pastoralists who equally rely on plant and animal goods. They mostly farm sorghum and maize as their main food crops and a source of cattle products, which they also use. Hamar, Kara, and Erebore are the three main ethnic groups in the study communities, with Hamar receiving the most attention. Most members of the community practice cultural religion (Table 2).

Table 2 Agroecology and socio-demography of the study area

Diversity of medicinal plant species used by the local community in the area

A total of 145 medicinal plant species used to treat human and livestock ailments were collected and documented from the study area. The record of major human and livestock ailments in the area, as well as the number of plant species used by the local people, revealed that 74 (51%) of the traditional medicinal plants were reported to be used only for humans, 42 (29%) were used to treat both human and livestock disorders, while 29 (20%) were used to treat only livestock diseases. The plant families Fabaceae (33 species, 22.8%), Asteraceae (16 species, 11%), and Lamiaceae (14 species, 9.6%) were found to be the most dominant families in the area.

Majority of the medicinal plant species (72%) were collected and identified from the wild, 21% were from home gardens, and the remaining 7% were recorded as semi-wild, which were found frequently both in the wild and at home gardens. Shrubs contributed the most to the growth forms of traditional medicinal plant species (42.2%), followed by herbs (24.7%), trees (23.9%), herbaceous climbers (6.4%), and lianas/woody climbers (2.8%). The leaf has the highest proportion (42.3%), and is the most commonly used medicinal plant parts used for preparing the remedies, followed by the root, contributing 15.5%, and the bark, which added 7.5% of the parts used (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

The percentage of medicinal plant parts used for preparing the remedy in Hamar

About 78.8% of the medicinal plant parts were reported by the informants to be used freshly, 14.1% was at dry status, and the remaining 7.1% could be either in dry or fresh state. The most frequently cited route of application of remedies in the area was oral (57.7%), followed by dermal application (14.8%). Drinking (42%) was the most frequently reported method of administration when recognizing the overall modes of application of the remedies, followed by chewing and swallowing (23%). Crushing (38%) was the most common method of preparation of traditional medicines in the area, followed by squeezing (33%) and pounding (19%). Besides, more than 70 different human and livestock ailments were identified as health issues in the area and are being treated by various plant species. Malaria was reported by 54% of the respondents as the most prevalent health problem in the area, followed by wounds (22%), snake bites (18%), and tapeworm (12%).

Dosage of medicinal plant remedies and ingredients added

The communities of the study area have developed knowledge of dosing the remedies based on their historical and long-term practical experience of using traditional medicinal plants for various ailments. Although there were different dosage units and administration periods, the common way of dosage delivery was determined by the degree of severity of the ailments treated, the patient’s or diseased animal’s health status, the age of the sick, and the experience of the local healer who administers the remedy. The informants also mentioned that various additives and solvents, including salt, coffee, tea, honey, milk, butter, soil, and water, are added to when preparing traditional remedies in the area. These ingredients were claimed to be used to reduce side-effects and improve the taste and lower the chances for poisoning. To measure the amount or dose of the remedy, various tools were used, including Carba, Onkolo, Basala shorka [all of which were made of Gusi (Lagenaria siceraria) and only differed in the size of the openings], finger length, coffee cup, tea cup, and others were used to measure the amount or dose of the remedy (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

The local materials used to measure the dose of the plant remedies in the study area (Photo by Melese Bekele 15, February 2020)

Efficacy of medicinal plant remedies

The informant consensus factor (ICF) analysis revealed that about 72 human and livestock ailments were considered within eleven disease categories, with the reproductive problem category scoring the highest ICF value (0.94); treated by 5 species and 72 use citations, followed by the category of gastrointestinal disorder, which scored an ICF value of 0.92 and was treated by 8 plant species and 97 use citations, while the lowest ICF value 0.87 was recorded for the category of dermal problems, treated by 7 species and 50 use citations(Table 3).

Table 3 Diseases categories with Informant Consensus Factor in the study area

The level of agreement among informants on each medical plant and the propensity of some medicinal plants to treat particular health issues were carefully evaluated. Accordingly, Phytolacca dodecandra had the highest fidelity level (94.1%) for treating rabies, followed by Albizia anthelmintica with a fidelity level of 88.3% for treating tapeworm and Moringa stenopetala with a fidelity level of 83.3% and used to treat cold and coughs in the area (Table 4).

Table 4 Shows the fidelity level of the medicinal plant species commonly used to treat the most common human diseases in the area

On the other hand, about 20% of the traditional medicinal plant species collected and identified from the study area were used to treat only livestock health problems. Furthermore, 29.6% of the plant species recorded for medicinal value was reported to be used to treat human and livestock ailments. The preference ranking of eight plant species used against the most commonly reported cattle disease (diarrhea) in the area revealed that Protea gaguedi stands the first, with a preference score of 71, followed by Amaranthus hybridus scoring 64 for its significance in the study area (Table 5).

Table 5 Preference ranking of commonly used plant species to treat diarrhea of the livestock in the community

Paired comparison

A paired comparison of medicinal plants for humans and livestock for treating snake bite poison (Guni Dhesha), which was reported to be one of the most common problems in the study area, was computed. Thus, seven plant species cited for treating snake bite poison were chosen, and eight key informants have assigned values to indicate the effectiveness and status of the plant species. Solanum incanum, Phytolacca dodecandra, Securidaca longepedunculata, and Stephania abyssinica were ranked first to fourth respectively. Verbena officinalis and Dombeya torrida were less preferred, and Pennisetum setaceum was the least preferred and least effective when compared to other species (Table 6).

Table 6 Paired comparison of seven plant species used to treat snake poison in the area

Other uses of the medicinal plant species in the area

The analysis of the medicinal plant species for their multipurpose usage showed that 10% of them were recorded for their food values, 8.9% for local house construction, 11% for fire wood and charcoal production, 4.8% for timber production, 7.6% for farm implementation materials, 9.6% for fodder, 10% for bee forage, 8.3% for shade/livestock shelter and 5.5% for soil fertility/conservation and 2.8% for cultural and ritual values.

Direct matrix ranking

Acacia mellifera took first place in the direct matrix ranking score of ten multipurpose plant species for seven different types of uses besides the medicinal use such as (fodder, food, firewood, construction, bee forage, furniture, shade and charcoal production), followed by Olea europaea subsp.cuspidata. In terms of use category evaluation, the use of these plant species for shade received the highest score compared to the other use categories (Table 7).

Table 7 Average value of direct matrix ranking of plant species based on their general use values (fod = fodder, foo = food, firew = firewood, con = construction, fora = bee forage, furn = furniture, shad = shade and char = charcoal production)

The preference ranking of ten plant species used for local house construction was tested against eight key informants giving the highest value 10 for the most important species and value 1 for the least preferred species for the mentioned purpose. Accordingly, Acacia mellifera was the most preferred species in the area for local house construction, followed by Terminalia brownii to be the second most important species preferred by the respondents. On the other hand, Combretum aculeatum was seen to score the least preference value relative to other species for the local house construction (Table 8).

Table 8 Preference ranking of ten plant species used for local house construction in the area

Timber production was viewed as one of the district's income-generating practices, particularly in the Dimeka town area, but less so in other areas. Because of their practical preference for strength and quality, the plant species used for this purpose are very selective and few in number. The preference ranking of the seven plant species with the highest citation revealed for the purpose during free listing was computed using ten key informants, yielding the highest value of seven (7) for the most preferred species and the lowest value one (1) for the least preferred species. Accordingly, Cordia africana was ranked at first, scoring 52 followed by Juniperus procera with 46 (Table 9).

Table 9 Preference ranking of seven plant species used for timber production in the area

Similarly, based on the preference of medicinal plant species reported for edibility by the community, the result indicated that Ximenia Americana stands at first place for its wild food value followed by Balanites aegyptiaca (Table 10).

Table 10 The preference ranking of the six most commonly used wild food plant species

The most popular tree/shrub species used for forage/fodder in the area include: Sesbania sesban, Vernonia amygdalina, Balanites aegyptiaca, Balanites rotundifolia, Maerua angolensis, Terminalia brownii, Acacia mellifera, Dichrostachys cinerea, Piliostigma thonningii, Erythrina brucei, Indigofera hirsuta, Dodonea angustifolia, Sida rhombifolia and Gardenia ternifolia. Accordingly, the preference ranking of eight forage/fodder plant species that had higher citation during free listing was computed using eight key informants scoring the highest value eight (8) for the most preferred species and the lowest value 1 for least preferred one. Thus, Sesbania sesban stands at first place followed by Gardenia ternifolia and Piliostigma thonningii as the second and third most preferred species respectively (Table 11).

Table 11 Preference ranking of eight plant species used for forage/fodder in the area

The preference of multipurpose plant species by the local community was also practical for livestock shade, bee foraging/honey production and beehive hanging. It was too treasured that the animals of the community were also able to prefer plant species based on their canopy cover for shading (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Plant species preferred for livestock shading in Hamar (Photo by Melese Bekele, 2019)

The preference ranking of six plant species used for shade that had higher citations during free listing of species used for shade and ranked by eight key informants indicated that Tamarindus indica became the first followed by Balanites aegyptiaca and Celtis africana as the second and third most preferred species for shade in the area (Fig. 11 and Table 12).

Table 12 Preference ranking of six plant species used for shade in the study area

Correspondingly, it was also observed that bee foraging and beehive hanging use categories require own specific species depending on flower characteristics, quality of the honey produced and height of the plant species (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Acacia tortilis preferred for bee foraging and traditional beehive hanging in Hamar (Photo by Melese Bekele, 2019)

To evaluate the most favorite plant species for beehive hanging and honey production in the area, preferences ranking of six plant species with higher citation were selected and valued by seven key informants scoring value 6 for highly preferred species and the lowest value 1 for the least chosen species (Table13).

Table 13 Preference ranking of six plant species for traditional honey production in the study area

The findings of the study also indicated that the indigenous peoples in the study area have distinct perspectives on nature and natural resources in their surroundings. They have deeply ingrained cultural, religious, spiritual, and ceremonial norms regarding biodiversity in general, as well as specific plant species used for various purposes in the area. Grewia ferruginea, for instance, is one of the most culturally favored plant species for making the stick (locally known as Michare) for whipping the young females (locally known as Anza) by the young males (Maaza) who have recently jumped the bull-jump (Equli-bulla) during Hamar's most-known cultural ceremony known as Ivan-gadi (Fig. 13).

Fig. 13
figure 13

Youngsters collecting the stick/’Michare’ (A), young males (Maaza) being ready for whipping the girl/‘Anza’ (B) and the young male (Maaza) whipping the girl/‘Anza’ (C) (photo by Melese Bekele 12, December 2020)

About 86% of the plant species recorded from the study area were reported for their higher levels of use diversity depending on the indigenous culture and practice of the community. As a result, the study's findings revealed the presence of a hoarded indigenous practice of using plant products for household items, farming implements, arts, musical instruments, and beauties for the community and some of them were mentioned bellow from A–H with their local (Hamar) name (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14
figure 14

A Borkota, B Hamarte, C Pasha, D Shikine, E Hamar gagie, F Ditie, G Gusi/Korsi and H Boko (photo by Melese Bekele 20, December 2020)

During the interview, informants mentioned that, various plant parts to be marketed in open markets to fulfill their economic and health needs. The market survey study also confirmed that selling and buying plant products is common in the study community.

The informants claimed during the interview that various plant parts were sold in open markets to satisfy their needs in terms of both economics and health. The market survey study also indicates that buying and selling plants and plant parts is common in the study community. Plant products with multiple uses were also seen being sold in Dimeka open market. Herbal drugs, household utensils, and edible parts (fruits and leaves) were the most popular. About 55% of the plants sold in the market can be found at home gardens, fences, and semi-wild areas. On the other hand lower percentage of them (30%) specifically used for medicine and edible fruits, were collected from only the wild. The plant species and plant parts observed in the market for sale include: Ximenia americana, Moringa stenopetala, Syzygium guineense, Gossypium arboretum, vigna unguiculata, Tamarindus indica, Dioscorea bulbifera, Lagenaria siceraria, Cucurbita pepo, Allium sativum, Amaranthus hybridus and Nicotiana tabacum (Fig. 15).

Fig. 15
figure 15

Venders selling various plant products in Dimeka Market (photo by Melese Bekele, 2019)

Cultural significance index (CSI)

The cultural significance index value considered for six most cited plant species revealed that Grewia ferruginea stands first having(CSI = 48) followed by Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata with a CSI value of 43.7(Table 14).

Table 14 The Cultural Significance Index (CSI) of some most cited plants: NIC = Number of informant citation, WV = Weighted Variables i = species management [managed (2) or non-managed (1)], e = Use preference [preferred (2) or not preferred (1)], c = Use frequency [frequently used (2) or rarely used (1)], CF = Correction factor [the number of informant citations for a given species divided by the number of informant citations for the most cited species]. (fod = fodder, foo = food, con = construction, fora = bee forage, furn = furniture, shad = shade and Cul/Rit = Cultural/Ritual use)

Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity (JCS)

A thorough comparison of the current study's findings with those of other similar studies conducted in Ethiopia revealed a considerably greater record of medicinal plant species in the area. To realize the degree of species similarity, the result of Jaccard's coefficient of similarity was obtained. Thus, the current study and the study done in Blue Hora District had the highest degree of medicinal plant species resemblance (33%), followed by Amaro Woreda (26%), whereas the degree of similarity was lower with the study conducted in Northwestern Ethiopia and Konta Special Woreda (16%) (Table 15).

Table 15 Jaccard’s Coefficient of Similarity (JCS) b/n the current study and other similar studies conducted in Ethiopia

Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA), there was a positive correlation between informant’s age and ethnobotanical knowledge or a significant variation among the age categories at (p < 0.05) (Table 16).

Table 16 Correlation between age of informants and ethnobotanical knowledge

Traditional knowledge transfer system of the community

In the Hamar community, the transfer of indigenous knowledge on the ethnobotanical plants use was most commonly by the words of mouth to their family members. The result of the study also indicated that the transfer system was the inheritance based by which most of the traditional healers transfer their knowledge being very selective based on the criteria they developed. Most usually, the closeness to the family, seniority in birth, ability to maintain secret, good conduct and gender (sometimes) were put as the main criteria for the selection. Accordingly, if the elder son/daughter become the candidate who can fulfill the criteria, he/she is given priority to have the knowledge. If he/she does not fulfill the requirement, the search for a hierarchal relationship to the family members is done to get the ideal nominee. Then during the transfer, the local community leaders become together, traditional ceremony (Ivangadi dance) is set, the transfer of traditional knowledge bounded by established rules and laws is done. The analysis of correlation between age and traditional knowledge also revealed that as age increases, the ethnobotanical knowledge of the community increases. i.e. there is a positive relationship between the age of informants and the indigenous knowledge they attain on use of plants (r2 = 0.6469 or r = 0.82) in the study area (Fig. 16).

Fig. 16
figure 16

The correlation between age and indigenous knowledge in the community

Major threats to the vegetation in the area

The informants reported the major threats to the vegetation of the study area, and their current status was also discovered during the field work. Debarking/ringing for beehive construction was identified as the most serious threat, followed by agricultural expansion and free grazing/overgrazing as the second and third most serious threats, respectively, in the area (Fig. 17).

Fig. 17
figure 17

Major treats to plants in the study area (photo by Melese Bekele, 20 December 2020)

A destructive effects ranking for major threats was conducted based on the informant's report as well as the field observation, taking into account their destructive status. As a result, ten key informants were chosen and asked to list and rank the factors on a scale of 1–7 (1-not/least destructive factor, 7-highly destructive factor). Accordingly, debarking (60 total score) came first, followed by agricultural expansion (54 total score) and free grazing (41 total score), with charcoal production being the least damaging threat factor in the area (Table 17).

Table 17 Major treating factors of the vegetation in the area

Discussion

The indigenous people of the study area have a wealth of knowledge and understanding of the natural resources in their immediate surroundings. A total of 145 medicinal plant species used for human and livestock ailments were identified from the area. When compared to other studies conducted in Ethiopia, such as [35] (who recorded 120 medicinal plant species), [29] recorded 93 medicinal plant species, and [45] with 131 plant species, this study had a higher number of medicinal plant species. The greater record of medicinal plant species in the current study could be attributed to the local community's total reliance on plants for health problems, regardless of the type of ailment as well as the shortages of modern medical services in the study area. On the other hand, the number is lesser when compared to [33, 46] where respectively 155 and 173 medicinal plant species were recorded.

The popularity of shrubs may be due to their abundance and year-round availability, as opposed to trees that are selectively cut for various purposes, as well as the only seasonal appearance of herbaceous species after the rainy season in the area. The dominance of shrubs was also observed in other surveys conducted in various parts of the country [32, 36]. On the other hand, this finding disagrees with some other studies conducted elsewhere in Ethiopia where herbs were realized to be the dominant growth habits of the studied medicinal plant species [29, 30].

Among the plant families recorded for medicinal use in the area, Fabaceae was the most dominant family, followed by Asteraceae. Their dominance is most likely due to their ability to distribute a wider range, as well as the species richness and abundance in the study flora. This result is also consistent with the discoveries of a study conducted in other areas in Ethiopia where these families made the greatest contribution [39, 46,47,48]. In terms of plant parts used in the preparation of the remedies, leaves accounted for the greatest proportion when compared to other parts. This could be attributed to the higher perceived efficacy of fresh plant parts which could be lost upon drying, accessibility, ease of harvesting, simplicity of preparation, and chemical components it provides to treat the ailments. The finding is consistent with the results of other studies [49,50,51,52], where leaves were the dominant plant parts used for preparation of remedies.

According to an investigation of the conditions of the medicinal plants used to prepare remedies, about 78.8 percent of the medicinal plant parts were reported to be used freshly. This could be due to the close proximity of the source of the material (natural vegetation) to the majority of the healers in their environment, making it easier to prepare, as well as their belief that fresh plant parts are more effective than dry parts. Other studies found comparable results [32, 53]. The most commonly mentioned route of application was identified to be oral (57.7%) followed by dermal application (14.8%). This could be attributed to the rapid reaction of the medicine to treat the illness that the local healers realized through their longer experience. Similarly drinking was seen to be the most preferred method of administration for the remedies in the area. The current finding is in agreement with different other studies [13, 46]. Likewise, the most leading method of remedy preparation in the area was through crushing followed by squeezing, which is in coherent with the previous study [31, 54].

A considerable number of medicinal plant species (72) were used to treat only human ailments, followed by species useful to cure both human and animals diseases (45 species) and species applied to treat only livestock diseases (28). This confirms the local community's reliance on traditional medicine for health problems. The outcome is consistent with the reports of [36, 49]. Malaria was mentioned as the most common disease in the area, followed by wounds, snake bites, and stomach problems. The predominance of malaria could be attributed to the study district's hot climatic conditions. Generally, the dose of the remedy administered depends on the diseases treated, health status of the person/animal and the experience of the local healer. The highest ICF value (0.94) was recorded for reproductive problem category followed by the category of gastrointestinal disorder (ICF value of 0.92). According to [55], the high ICF values were important in identifying plants of an actual interest in the exploration for bioactive compounds.

The fidelity level values of medicinal plant species that are often utilized by the local community to treat one or a small number of illnesses are higher than those of less common species. Higher fidelity level may also be a sign of the plant's ability to effectively treat a certain ailment. Accordingly, the uppermost fidelity level (94.1%) was scored by Phytolacca dodecandra for treating rabies followed by Albizia anthelmintica with the fidelity level of (88.3%) for treating tapeworm and Moringa stenopetala with the fidelity level of 83.3% and used to treat cold/cough. Based on [24, 55], the fidelity level values could be used as a clue to identify medicinal plants of higher healing potential and those needed for further phytochemical and bioactive materials studies. In the preference ranking of different species used to cure malaria in the area, Vepris dainellii stood at the first position showing the most preferred species for treating malaria in the community followed by Vernonia amygdalina and Gardenia ternifolia. On the other hand, the preference ranking exercise on the eight plant species used against the most commonly reported cattle diarrhea in the area depicted that Protea gaguedi scored the uppermost rank followed by Amaranthus hybridus. Hence, the greater performance ranking value of the documented medicinal plant species could enable the forthcoming phytochemical and pharmaceutical studies and the conservation activities in the area.

Non medicinal uses

Based on the results of ranking and scoring of plant species in specific use categories evaluated, the relative importance of each species in various use categories ensured major benefits. Accordingly, the highest preference ranking of Acacia mellifera for local house construction could be the strength of its wood as well as a better availability of the species in the area Similarly, the plant species used for timber production in the area were also seen to be very selective and few in number because of their practical preference for strength and quality.

The preference ranking of the seven plant species used for timber production revealed that Cordia africana scored the top rank followed by Juniperus procera. On the other hand, in the case of forage/fodder plant species, one plant species could be preferred over the other based on the seasonal availability and the product (amount and quality of milk, butter and others) of the livestock after feeding the forage plant. For instance due to a highly erratic nature of rainfall in the dry lands of the study region, there happens a nearby disappearance of nutritious grasses at the season for which trees and shrubs are an essential part of the pastoral to feed their livestock, which was not the case during the rainy season. A practical preference of various plant species for livestock shade, bee foraging/honey production, house hold utensils, beehive hanging and ceremonial and spiritual values was also seen in the area. The selection of the species could be based on their quality for the respective purposes used. For instance, canopy cover, quality of the honey produced, strength of the wood, height of the tree to be seen and cultural acceptance were respectively used as basic criteria for the preference. The commonly observed selling and buying practice of the plant parts and their products in an open market in the area, witnesses that the utmost dependence of the community on the plants in their environment to their day to day life as well as the cultural acceptance of using these resources in the area.

According to [20], many relative cultural significance indices group the distinct uses of plant species mentioned by informants into major use categories. As a result, the cultural significance index of the most frequently cited plant species in the area was assessed for various major use categories. For a variety of purposes, this could be used to prioritize and identify the most important and preferred species in the study area. Hence, in the study area, Grewia ferruginea (CSI = 48) was the most culturally significant species followed by Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata with a CSI value of 43.7. The highest degree of Jaccard’s coefficient of similarity (33%) was realized between the current study and the study done in Blue Hora District, Borana Zone [32] which could be attributed to the most related agro-ecological and climatic conditions in these study regions than the other areas compared.

Major threats to the vegetation in the area

According to [56], the threats to biodiversity exceed the natural rate of regeneration and are primarily caused by habitat destruction, overharvesting, pollution, and the introduction of alien species. Based on the findings of this study, the major threats to medicinal plant species in particular, as well as to the vegetation of the Buska Mountain range in general, were debarking/ringing for beehive production, followed by agricultural expansion, free grazing/overgrazing, and abandoned fire, all of which were thought to be the most damaging in the area. The naturally erratic nature of the rainfall in the area, as well as the resulting frequent drought, combined with anthropogenic factors, endangers the biodiversity in the area along with the associated indigenous knowledge that requests for the community's conservation actions to be strengthened as soon as possible.

Comparison with previous ethnobotanical studies in Ethiopia

Allium sativum L. was the most frequently used medicinal plant for Tuberculosis, internal parasites, and common cold treatment in the present study area. Likewise, Seyoum and Zerihun [31] reported use of this species for abdominal problem, common cold and snake bite in Debre Libanos Wereda, Central Ethiopia. On the other hand, Megersa et al. [39] reported it for malaria and headache treatment in east Welega zone of Oromia regional state, West Ethiopia. Wubetu et al. [42] reported the plants’ use in Dega Damot district, Northwestern Ethiopia for treatment of Evil eye.

Calpurnia aurea (Aiton) Benth.was the most frequently used plant and reported to be used against skin disease/scabies/and diarrhea in current study. Similarly, Lulekal et al. [55] reported the use of this species for tick infestation; helminthiasis and snake bite in Ankober District, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia; [31] from Central Ethiopia also reported the use of this plant for external parasites and abdominal pain. Tefera and Kim [57] mentioned the plant use for Gastritis, stomachache and toothache. Bekalo et al. [35], from the southern Ethiopia, reported the use of the species for treating snake bite. Its use also conveyed from West Ethiopia [39], for the treatment of Ascaris.

Stephania abyssinica (Dill. & A.Rich.) Walp. was the most commonly used medicinal plant in the present study area for coughing/pneumonia and amoeboid dysentery. Similar study from West Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia [58] reported the use of this species for abdominal impelling, febrile illness and diarrhea. The species was also cited to treat wound [31], for common cold [39], to treat eye disease and amoeba [57].

Ocimum lamiifolium Hochst. ex Benth. was reported in the present study for the treatment of bloat/swelling and headache. Similarly, Seyoum and Zerihun from Debre Libanos Wereda [31] reported this plant for headache and cough. However, the species was reported for the fever and febrile illness in the study conducted in Tigray Regional State [38], for cough in Wonago Woreda [40] and Kassa et al.[59], from Sheka Zone reported it for the treatment of parasites.

The use of Phytolacca dodecandra L’Hér reported in the present study for the treatment of Ascaris, rabies and snake bite. In the study conducted in West Gojjam Zone [58], the plant was also mentioned to treat abdominal pain (swelling, vomiting), rabies and scabies. Megersa et al. [39], however reported this plant for Gonorrhea and liver disease, Lulekal et al.[55], reported the plant for treating ecto and endo-parasites.

In general, based on a comparison of our findings with earlier ethnobotanical studies in Ethiopia, a number of the plant species documented and reported for the treatment of various ailments in the current research community were reported in one way or another in various studies conducted in the country. The present study's findings did, however, also document some novel plant uses of medicinal plants that were only known to the current study community. Albizia anthelmintica (A.Rich.) Brongn., Protea gaguedi J.F.Gmel., Vangueria volkensii K.Schum., Solanum dasyphyllum, Nicandra physalodes (L.) Gaertn. and Maerua angolensis L. were utterly novel uses in our study area that had never been documented in other studies of a similar sort across the country. These plants' pharmacological properties are novel discoveries that have only been used in our study community. Thus, the species suggestion in this situation was used sparingly based on both actual field observations and contextualized source data from the community on the cultural worth and importance of plants. Comparing ethnobotanical indices across research and cultures can be difficult due to cultural differences, sample sizes, emic use categories, and a variety of other aspects; nonetheless, relevant constraints and considerations for the indices were taken into account during the evaluation.

The outcomes of the investigation also revealed that the research area was rich in ethnomedicinal plants and indigenous knowledge regarding their usage. Local travelers, for instance, demonstrated a strong understanding of these curative and lucrative medicinal plants in some of the study villages, as did local healers or traditional herbalists. Furthermore, the vegetation of the Buska Mountain range was known to be passed down from generation to generation by Hamar tribe leaders. As a result, the findings of this study will be critical in raising awareness and encouraging experience sharing both locally and among a broader audience, serving as a springboard for policies that prioritize public health and bioactivity. Similarly, it might be utilized as a foundation for future research on ethnomedicinal plants, stimulating phytochemical and pharmacological investigations as well as the sharing of practical experience of conservation efforts from the study community to the national level (Additional file 1).

Conclusion

The people of the study area have accumulated indigenous knowledge of categorizing and using the vegetation in their surrounding area, as well as the rich plant resources, for various use categories. The findings of the study also publicized that the Buska Mountain range has relatively diverse plant species of medicinal use to treat human and livestock conditions.

More than 70 various human and livestock disorders have been identified as health issues in the area and are being treated by various plant species identified by the community. On the other hand, malaria was reported to be the most prevalent diseases in the area followed by wound, snake bite and tapeworm. Utmost reliance of the local community on the plant products of the vegetation in the area for other than medicinal values was also comprehended in the current study. However, currently, the biodiversity in the area in general, as well as the medicinal plant species in particular, are under a serious pressure and threats by most of anthropogenic factors combined with the current climatic conditions threatening the dry land areas in the country. As a result, the conservation activities of the local community should be reinvigorated and supported by scientific evidence based conservation actions as soon as possible.

Availability of data and materials

All the needed data collected for this study were analyzed and incorporated in this manuscript.

References

  1. Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: principles and applications. Chichester: Wiley; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pharmacotherapy Group. Current trends in ethnobotany. Trop J Pharm Res. 2009;8(4):295–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soejarto DD, Gyllenhaal C, Riley MC, Zhang H. Ethnobotany of natural products. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK. http://www.eolss.net. 2009.

  4. Urga K, Ayele A, Merga G. Traditional medicine in Ethiopia proceedings of a national work shop held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 30 June–2 July 2003. EHNRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2004.

  5. Fenetahun Y, Eshetu G. A review on ethnobotanical studies of medicinal plants use by agro-pastoral communities in. Ethiop J Med Plants. 2017;5(1):33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aththorick TA, Berutu L. Ethnobotanical study and phytochemical screening of medicinal plants on Karonese people from North Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Journal of physics: conference series 2018 Dec 1, vol. 1116, no. 5. IOP Publishing. p. 052008.

  7. World Health Organization. Legal status of traditional medicine and complementary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sophia, T. Maale Material Objects in their social and ritual context. Dissertation MA thesis. Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, 2005.

  9. World Health Organization. Traditional medicine and modern health care: progress report by the director general. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bishaw B. Deforestation and land degradation in the Ethiopian highlands: a strategy for physical recovery. Northeast Afr Stud. 2001;8:7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friis IB, Demissew S. Vegetation maps of Ethiopia and Eritrea. A review of existing maps and the need for a new map for the flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea. In: Biodiversity research in the Horn of Africa Region; 2001. pp. 399–439.

  12. Woldu Z, Dragan M, Feoli E, Fernetti M. Reducing soil erosion in Northern Ethiopia, Adwa Zone, through a special decision support system (SDSS). Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2002;1(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Senbeta F, Denich M. Effects of wild coffee management on species diversity in the Afromontane rainforests of Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag. 2006;232(1–3):68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balemie K, Kelbessa E, Asfaw Z. Indigenous medicinal plant utilization, management and threats in Fentalle area, Eastern Shewa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2004;3(1):37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Limenih Y, Umer S, Wolde-Mariam M. Ethnobotanical study on traditional medicinal plants in Dega Damot woreda, Amhara Region, North Ethiopia. Int J Res Pharm Chem. 2015;5(2):258–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abebe D. The role of medicinal plants in health care coverage of Ethiopia: the possible benefits of integration; 2001.

  17. Tefera S, Enawgaw C, Tekle D, Eid A, Olibui O, LaTosky S, Detona M, Nigatu A, Flintan FE. Pastoralists do plan! Community-led land use planning in the pastoral areas of Ethiopia. Rangelands; 2016.

  18. Alexiades MN. Collecting ethnobotanical data: an introduction to basic concepts and techniques. Adv Econ Bot. 1996;10:53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: a methods manual. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunningham AB. Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. London: Routledge; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffman B, Gallaher T. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007;5:201–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Albuquerque UP, et al editors. Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Cham: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nemarundwe N, Richards M. Participatory methods for exploring livelihood values derived from forests: potential and limitations. In: Uncovering the hidden harvest; 2012. p. 184–213.

  24. Phillips O, Gentry AH. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot. 1993;47(1):33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heinrich M, Ankli A, Frei B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(11):1859–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Da Silva VA, Andrade LD, De Albuquerque UP. Revising the cultural significance index: the case of the Fulni-ô in northeastern Brazil. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spss II. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM Corp; 2011. p. 394.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seifu T, Asres K, Gebre-Mariam T. Ethnobotanical and ethnopharmaceutical studies on medicinal plants of Chifra district, Afar region, North Eastern Ethiopia. Ethiop Pharm J. 2004;24(1):41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Amsalu N, Bezie Y, Fentahun M, Alemayehu A, Amsalu G. Use and conservation of medicinal plants by indigenous people of Gozamin Wereda, East Gojjam Zone of Amhara region, Ethiopia: an ethnobotanical approach. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2973513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giday M, Asfaw Z, Woldu Z. Medicinal plants of the Meinit ethnic group of Ethiopia: an ethnobotanical study. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124(3):513–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seyoum G, Zerihun G. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Debre Libanos Wereda, Central Ethiopia. Afr J Plant Sci. 2014;8(7):366–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eshete MA, Kelbessa E, Dalle G. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Guji agro-pastoralists, Blue Hora District of Borana Zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. J Med Plants Stud. 2016;4(2):170–84.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Enyew A, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Nagappan R. Ethnobotanical study of traditional medicinal plants in and around Fiche District, Central Ethiopia. Curr Res J Biol Sci. 2014;6(4):154–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gonfa N, Tulu D, Hundera K, Raga D. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants, its utilization, and conservation by indigenous people of Gera district, Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2020;6(1):1852716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bekalo TH, Woodmatas SD, Woldemariam ZA. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by local people in the lowlands of Konta Special Woreda, southern nations, nationalities and peoples regional state, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolossa K, Debela E, Athanasiadou S, Tolera A, Ganga G, Houdijk JG. Ethno-medicinal study of plants used for treatment of human and livestock ailments by traditional healers in South Omo, Southern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mesfin F, Seta T, Assefa A. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Amaro Woreda, Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2014;12:341–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gebru MG, Lulekal E, Bekele T, Demissew S. Use and management practices of medicinal plants in and around mixed woodland vegetation, Tigray Regional State, Northern Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2021;21:1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Megersa M, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Beyene A, Woldeab B. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wayu Tuka district, east Welega zone of Oromia Regional State, West Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mesfin F, Demissew S, Teklehaymanot T. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Wonago Woreda, SNNPR, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seble WY, Zemede A, Ensermu K. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by local people in Menz Gera Midir district, North Shewa Zone, Amhara Regional state, Ethiopia. J Med Plants Res. 2018;12(21):296–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wubetu M, Abula T, Dejenu G. Ethnopharmacologic survey of medicinal plants used to treat human diseases by traditional medical practitioners in Dega Damot district, Amhara, Northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zerabruk S, Yirga G. Traditional knowledge of medicinal plants in Gindeberet district, Western Ethiopia. S Afr J Bot. 2012;78:165–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Moges A, Moges Y. Ethiopian common medicinal plants: their parts and uses in traditional medicine-ecology and quality control. In: Plant science-structure, anatomy and physiology in plants cultured in vivo and in vitro; 2019. p. 21

  45. Kefalew A, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in Ada’a District, East Shewa Zone of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11(1):1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kidane L, Gebremedhin G, Beyene T. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in ganta afeshum district, eastern zone of tigray, northern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Demissew S, Belayneh A. Diversity and population structure of woody species browsed by elephants in Babile Elephant Sanctuary, eastern Ethiopia: an implication for conservation. Ethiop e-J Res Innov Foresight. 2011;3(1):20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lulekal E, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Yineger H. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Mana Angetu District, southeastern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008;4(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Amenu E. Use and management of medicinal plants by indigenous people of Ejaji area (Chelya Woreda) West Shoa, Ethiopia: An ethnobotanical approach. M.Sc. Thesis. 2007.

  50. Giday M, Ameni G. An ethnobotanical survey of plants of veterinary importance in two woredas of Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. SINET Ethiop J Sci. 2003;26(2):123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tadesse M, Hunde D, Getachew Y. Survey of medicinal plants used to treat human diseases in Seka Chekorsa, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2005;15(2):89–106.

  52. Haile Y, Ensermu K, Tamrat B, Ermias L. Plants used in traditional management of human ailments at Bale Mountains National Park, Southeastern Ethiopia. J Med Plants Res. 2008;2(6):132–53.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Behailu E. Ethnobotanical study of traditional medicinal plants of Goma Wereda, Jima zone of Oromia region, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University).

  54. Tolassa E. Use and management of medicinal plants in Ghimbi District. Southwest Ethiopia: M.Sc. thesis, Addis Ababa University, Biology Department. 2007.

  55. Lulekal E, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E, Van Damme P. Ethnoveterinary plants of Ankober district, north Shewa zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gannon P, Seyoum-Edjigu E, Cooper D, Sandwith T, Ferreira de Souza Dias B, Pașca Palmer C, Lang B, Ervin J, Gidda S. Status and prospects for achieving Aichi Biodiversity Target 11: implications of national commitments and priority actions. Parks. 2017;23(2):13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tefera BN, Kim YD. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in the Hawassa Zuria District, Sidama zone, Southern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Alemneh D. Ethnobotanical study of plants used for human ailments in Yilmana Densa and Quarit districts of west Gojjam zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. BioMed Res Int. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6615666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kassa Z, Asfaw Z, Demissew S. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Sheka Zone of Southern Nations Nationalities and people’s regional state, Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Corresponding author acknowledges Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute for providing an opportunity to Ph.D. study and Addis Ababa University for financial support. The cooperation and support of Hamar community during data collection is highly acknowledged.

Funding

There was no external funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first author (MB) collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. The other authors (Professor SD, Professor TB, Dr. EL & Dr. FW) have contributed to the research design, interpretation, and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melese Bekele.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Medicinal plants used for the treatment of human diseases. The file lists plant species used to treat human ailments, scientific and local name of plant species, plant part used, voucher number, methods of preparation and application.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bekele, M., Woldeyes, F., Lulekal, E. et al. Ethnobotanical investigation of medicinal plants in Buska Mountain range, Hamar district, Southwestern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 18, 60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00558-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00558-0

Keywords

  • Buska Mountain range
  • Conservation
  • Ethnobotany
  • Indigenous knowledge
  • Local community
  • Medicinal plants