Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

A survey of wild plant species for food use in Sicily (Italy) – results of a 3-year study in four Regional Parks

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine201612:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0074-7

©  Licata et al. 2016

  • Received: 3 August 2015
  • Accepted: 15 December 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

This paper illustrates the results of a study carried out in four Regional Parks of Sicily (Italy), concerning traditional knowledge on food use of wild plant species. The main aims of the paper were: (i) to verify which wild plant species are used for food purpose in the local culture based on information provided by elderly inhabitants (ii) to verify the presence of wild plant species which have not been cited for food use in previous studies in the Mediterranean area (iii) to determine how many of the most frequently cited wild plant species are cultivated by the local population in the four Sicilian Parks.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were carried out in the local communities of the four Regional Parks between 2007 and 2010. A total of 802 people over the age of 60 were interviewed. Cultural Importance Index was used to evaluate the level of importance given to any wild plant species as a food in the local culture. The level of appreciation of the wild plant species and the possible effects of wild plants on human health were also investigated.

Results

Local communities currently use a total number of 119 wild species for food purposes. Asteraceae and Brassicaceae were the most represented botanical families. In each of the four Sicilian Parks, Cichorium intybus L. and Foeniculum vulgare Mill. obtained the highest Cultural Importance Index values. Sixty-four species were indicated as also having medicinal properties. Leaves and other aerial plant parts were the parts most-used for the preparation of traditional recipes.

Conclusions

The research shows that the level of traditional knowledge on the food uses of wild plant species in the study area is poor. The food uses of plants which are most likely to survive over time are those at the interface of food and medicine. Further agronomic studies are needed for a number of species with a view to introducing them as a crop into non-intensive agricultural systems.

Keywords

  • Wild plant species
  • Food use
  • Sicilian Regional Parks
  • Traditional plant knowledge
  • Cultural importance index

Background

Wild plant species have always played a fundamental role in the diet of man. Although plants once represented a good source of food in rural areas, there has been a gradual change in lifestyle over the centuries; people have moved away from the countryside and there has been huge progress in farming methods. Wild plants became a progressively less important source of food over time, as it was replaced by food products from intensive farming crops and industrialized processing. Food habits and tastes have undergone intense change, with the introduction of increasingly more refined and highly-processed industrial food products. In more recent times, the consumption of food products of animal origin has increased sharply, giving rise to a series of health problems, exacerbated by a fall in the consumption of plant foods rich in fiber, vitamins and trace elements [1, 2]. Furthermore, a substantial increase in the use of pesticides and fertilizers is threatening the ecosystem, upsetting plant biodiversity and causing a fall in wild plant species numbers [3–7]. In an effort to highlight the importance of wild plant species in our diets, a number of studies have been carried out in recent years in the Mediterranean area documenting the nutritional and medicinal properties of these plants [8–16]. Compared to cultivated a number of wild plant species have been reported to contain greater levels of fiber [13], to have far greater antioxidant and flavonoid levels [17–19] and to contain a smaller amount of lipids [20]. A number of studies maintain that the carbohydrate, fibre, polyphenol, protein, mineral, vitamin and ω-3 fatty acid content [21–30] of various parts of the wild plants can have beneficial effects on human health. This reinforces the concept of food as medicinal, first expressed by Hypocrites in 400 BC [28]. The well-documented health properties of wild food plants have also contributed to increasing their importance as a part of the Mediterranean diet [31, 32]. This nutritional model, based on the consumption of cereals, legumes, vegetables, fresh fruit and olive oil, is recognized on a nutraceutical level throughout the world and has also been designated in recent years as a UNESCO Masterpiece of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity (2010). It seems clear from the previously cited ethnobotanical studies that a large number of wild plant species are consumed as food in various different areas of the Mediterranean: proof of the existence of knowledge and traditions linked to autochthonous ecological and cultural factors [33], and of the role that wild plant species have had in the various cultures and ethnic groups [13, 34]. In Sicily (Italy) – an island with a high level of plant biodiversity - much has been written on the food/medicinal use of wild plant species [2, 35–47]. Lentini and Venza [14] gave data and information on 188 wild plant species used in traditional Sicilian cuisine. However, quantitative analysis of the data does not appear in literature and the cultural importance of the food use of wild plants in Sicily had not been determined previous to this study. The discovery of rare wild plant species and the estimation of their cultural significance constitute an innovative aspect of the research in this field. This paper reports the results of a study on the food use of wild plant species in 4 Regional Parks in Sicily. The study includes only shrub and herbaceous species, collected from various natural areas in the 4 Parks. The areas encompassed in the study were the Madonie Regional Park, Nebrodi Regional Park, Etna Regional Park and the Monti Sicani Regional Park. The main aims of the paper were: (i) to verify those wild plant species used for food purpose by the local culture within 4 Sicilian Parks (ii) to identify any wild plants not mentioned in previous studies in the Mediterranean area as regards their food use (iii) to determine how many wild food plants are/could be cultivated locally in each of the 4 Sicilian Parks.

Methods

Research area

The study area covered four mountainous, hinterland areas in Sicily (Italy): the Madonie Regional Park (Central Sicily), Nebrodi Regional Park (North-Eastern Sicily), Etna Regional Park (Eastern Sicily) and Sicani Regional Park (Central-Western Sicily) (Fig. 1). Based on the Rivas-Martinez bioclimatic index [48], the study area ranged from an upper thermo-Mediterranean, lower-subhumid coastal environment to an upper supra-Mediterranean, upper-humid at the higher altitudes, bioclimatic zones.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map of the study area, showing Etna, Madonie, Nebrodi and Monti Sicani Regional Parks

The Madonie Regional Park (37°45’ 38°03’ N latitude, and 13°50’ 14°12’ E longitude) encompasses 15 towns (altitudes ranging from 0 to 1979 m a.s.l.) and extends over an area of 400 km2 [49, 50]. There are 170 endemic plant species in the area [51], accounting for approx. 50 % of all Sicilian endemic species. A substantial part of the park is woodland (25 %) including typically Mediterranean species such as Quercus ilex L. and Quercus suber L., and central and northern European species, such as Ilex aquifolium L., Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Crops are grown on relatively small plots and include olives, grapes, pome fruits, stone fruits and vegetables.

The Nebrodi Regional Park (37°56’07.2” N latitude, 14°42’19.2” E longitude) covers an area of 856 km2 and is the most extensive protected natural area in Sicily, encompassing 23 towns. Park altitudes vary considerably: the lowest areas are only a few metres above sea level but the Park is also home to Monte Soro, which soars 1.847 m above sea level [52]. Although the Park covers less than a tenth of the Island (8 %), examples of nearly half of all island species can be found here (45 %); many of which of considerable taxonomic and phyto-geographical interest. A particularly high number of regional endemisms can be found amongst the Nebrodi mountain flora, such as the Nebrodi broom (Genista aristata C. Presl.), the Nebrodi Carline Thistle (Carlina nebrodensis Guss. ex DC.), the Boccone Hellebores (Helleborus bocconei Ten.) and the Boccone Turkey Oak [Quercus gussonei (Borzí) Brullo]. Cereal and fodder crops are grown in the area, together with a substantial number of olive, fruit and horticultural crops. The animal farming sector is also fairly consistent, a factor which affords environmental and economic protection.

Etna Regional Park was the first national Park to be established by the Region of Sicily. It is 590 km2 and encloses 20 towns. The Park’s most important resident is without doubt Mount Etna, the highest and most active volcano in Europe, declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in June 2013. The land in the park is highly varied. There are large areas of fertile soils with dense woodland or shrubby, meadow areas, and, in stark contrast, vast areas where fresh lava gathers and where no vegetation grows. The most abundant forest species, found at most altitudes on Etna, are Quercus ilex, and the deciduous oaks belonging to the Quercus robur L. group : Quercus cerris L., Castanea sativa Miller, Fagus sylvatica L., Betula pendula Roth and Pinus nigra subsp. laricio Maire [53]. Agriculture in the Etna area is known for its high quality and large variety of fruit crops, thanks to a number of ancient varieties which have survived over the centuries. Most common crops are apple, citrus, chestnut, pistachio, vine and olives.

The Monti Sicani Regional Park (37.40-37.87 latitude; 13.18-13.63 longitude) covers a surface area of about 230 km2 and includes 32 small towns [54]. The altitudinal range of this study area is from 300 to 1613 m a.s.l. A total of 850 vascular plants grow in the Park, 68 (9.5 %) of which are endemic to the park. The woodlands areas are vast, mainly populated by evergreen and deciduous oaks (Quercus ilex, Quercus suber, Quercus gussonei and Quercus pubescens Willd. s.l.) Forests border on traditional olive groves, fruit orchards and crop fields growing cereals, fodder, and vegetables. are also common.

Field interview methods

The research was carried out by conducting interviews in the 90 towns of the 4 Sicilian Parks. The interviewers selected elderly people who had spent their entire lives in the area and who were/had been traditional farmers (agriculture and livestock farming). The interview protocol is described in [36–39]. Interviews followed a semi-structured format [55]. The study was carried out following the ISE code of Ethics [56], informants were made aware of the scope of the study and Prior Informed Consent [57] was requested verbally. The conversations took place in Italian. However, in some cases, Sicilian dialect was used. The interviewees were asked to speak freely about wild food species in order to acquire a list of those species used. The following questions were asked during the interview: Which plants have you used in your lifetime and which do you continue to use today for food purposes? Which of these plants used for food purposes have you also used for other reasons? How do you use the plants? Where do you gather these plants? How useful do you consider these plants to be for food purposes? Do you know the cultivation techniques required for these plants Do you use any wild food plants also for medicinal purposes, etc. The number of wild plant species which are/could be cultivated by the local populations, the level of appreciation of wild plants compared to cultivated plants and the possible effects on human health were also investigated. The plants collected were used to prepare exsiccata in the laboratories of the Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences at the University of Palermo. The plants were identified using the Italian Flora [58]. Plant nomenclature was verified by consulting online databases, such as theplantlist.org [59] and tropicos.org [60]. Voucher specimen codes were created and specimens deposited at the Corissia Research Centre Herbarium of Sicilian Regional. This study was part of the regional project “Environmental and plant resources in the Mediterranean: study, valorisation and defence”, which took place from 2007-2011, funded by the Sicilian Regional Ministry of Agriculture and Food Resources (Italy). The main aims of the project were to select wild plant species which are of agricultural interest from Sicilian flora, and to improve knowledge on food, medicinal and handicraft uses of the species based on information collected from the local culture.

Analysis of the data

In order to verify the existence or not of previous citations of a given plant species for food use in the Mediterranean area, and to compare food uses with other studies, literature from other regions in Italy and other Mediterranean countries was consulted. From the information gained, we were able to determine a series of data, such as the most cited species, the most cited food uses, the most used parts of the plants and the most common culinary uses. By applying the Cultural Importance Index (C.I.) [15], we were then able to estimate the cultural significance of each species, that is to verify, in quantitative terms, to what extent each species is present in the local culture and in the memory of the inhabitants. This index was calculated using the following formula:
$$ {\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^{i= NU}\frac{URi}{N}} $$
(1)
it was obtained by summing the use reports (UR) in every use-category (i varies from only one use to the total number of uses, NU) obtained for any given species, divided by the number of informants in the interviews (N).

Results and discussion

Informants

A total of 658 men (82 %) and 144 women (18 %) were interviewed. The informants were aged between 60 and 90, giving and the average informant age was 73.9 years. The informants aged 70-80 years were able to supply the greatest information on the plants in terms of numbers of plants cited; less information was obtained by the younger and older age brackets. Regarding the lack of information provided by the older informants, this was in large part due to communication difficulties which arose during interviews. A far greater number of men than women were interviewed in the 4 Sicilian Parks and, therefore, the female contribution to the acquisition of information was low. This male prevalence was not intentional and was mainly due to the fact that the elderly men were more available/willing to participate. The significant lack of women in the survey we did not consider to be of decisive importance regarding information on the number of wild food plants as the men had spent most of their lives in the countryside and forests and had expert knowledge of the plants. The under-representation of women, however, may have contributed to a smaller amount of detailed information on the processing and cooking methods of wild food plants. Confirmation of this may come from Hardy’s theory [61] which maintains that the dissemination of traditional knowledge is prevalently female. All the informants said they had been resident in the area of study since birth. 72 % of informants were either retired or working farmers, foresters or herdsmen and 28 % were craftsmen, shopkeepers, teachers and housewives.

General data on wild food plant species

A total of 119 wild shrub and herbaceous plant species were reported as being used for food purposes (Appendix). The species belong to 34 families. For each of the species the scientific name, voucher specimen code and folk names are listed. Ethno-biological information is provided by the plant parts used, preparation methods, the food/medicinal use of species, the number of citations, the presence of the species in the Sicilian Parks and the level of perceived usefulness. Similarities in the use of wild food species between the investigated area and those reported in studies in Sicily, in other Italian regions and some Mediterranean countries are also shown. The most represented families are Asteraceae (33 species), Brassicaceae (14 species), Lamiaceae (10 species), Asparagaceae (8 species) and Leguminosae (6 species). Only 4 species with food properties from the study were identified as being endemic to Sicily, according to [51]: Asperula rupestris Tineo, Brassica rupestris Raf., Carlina sicula Ten. and Urtica rupestris Guss. The predominance of Asteraceae in food use and food/medicinal use confirmed results from a number of studies carried out in Mediterranean countries [7, 11, 14] and [62–70]. In most cases, the species had similar names in dialect throughout the 90 towns included in the area of study. The informants used 187 dialectal names to indicate the 119 species in the study. The majority of the species were collected in the wild, or more rarely, gathered from the wild and then planted in kitchen gardens. Natural habitats such as roadsides, rocky slopes, dry meadows and uncultivated areas were the favourite habitats for gathering wild food species. Although cultivating the plants in kitchen gardens would potentially ensure their availability throughout the year, informants still preferred to gather the plants from the wild. Some aromatic species some, such as Mentha spp., are collected from natural habitats (wetlands, wet meadows), while others, such as Rosmarinus officinalis L. are often cultivated for food and/or medicinal purposes (Table 1).
Table 1

Gathering season, habitat and Sicilian endemism of 119 wild plant species from four Sicilian Regional Parks

Plant species

Gathering period

Habitat

Allium ampeloprasum L.

spring, winter

cultivated areas

Allium subhirsutum L.

spring, winter

cultivated areas

Ammi majus L.

spring

fields, pastures

Anagyris foetida L.

spring

fields, maquis, woods

Anthriscus nemorosa (M. Bieb.) Spreng.

spring

fields, woods

Apium nodiflorum (L.) Lag.

spring, summer

wetlands, wet meadows, grassland

Arabis hirsuta (L.) Scop.

autumn, spring, winter

pastures, roadsides, rocky slopes, walls

Aristolochia sempervirens L.

spring, winter

garrigue, maquis, woods

Artemisia alba Turra

spring, summer

dry meadows, rocky slopes

Asparagus albus L.

spring, winter

garrigue, uncultivates areas

Asparagus acutifolius L.

spring, winter

garrigue, uncultivated areas, woods

Asparagus aphillus L.

spring, winter

garrigue, maquis, uncultivated areas

Asparagus horridus L.

spring, winter

garrigue, maquis

Asphodeline lutea (L.) Rchb.

spring

dry meadows, pastures

Asphodelus ramosus L.

spring, winter

dry meadows, rocky slopes, uncultivated areas

a Asperula rupestris Tineo

spring

rocky slopes

Barbarea vulgaris R. Br.

spring, summer

rocky slopes, roadsides

Borago officinalis L.

autumn, winter

cultivated areas

Brassica fruticulosa Cirillo

autumn

fields, maquis, meadows

a Brassica rupestris Raf.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

fields, rocky slopes

Bunias erucago L.

autumn, spring, winter

meadows, walls

Calendula arvensis (Vaill.) L.

spring, winter

meadows, roadsides

Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br.

spring

fields, meadows, wetlands

Capparis spinosa L.

spring, summer

rocky slopes, walls

Carduus argyroa Biv.

winter

pastures, roadsides, uncultivated areas

Carduus corymbosus Ten.

summer

pastures, roadsides, uncultivated areas, walls

Carlina corymbosa L.

spring

grassland, roadsides, rocky slopes

Carlina gumnifera L. (Less.)

spring, summer

dry grassland, garrigue, roadsides, uncultivated areas

a Carlina sicula Ten.

spring

garrigue, pastures

Carthamus pinnatus Desf.

spring, winter

garrigue, pastures, uncultivated areas

Centaurea solstitialis L. subsp. schouwii (DC.) Gugler

spring, winter

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Chondrilla juncea L.

spring, summer

dry meadows, uncultivated areas, walls

Cichorium intybus L.

spring

cultivated areas

Clematis cirrhosa L.

spring

maquis, walls

Clematis vitalba L.

spring

maquis, hedges, walls, woods

Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze

spring, summer

meadows, uncultivated areas

Crepis vesicaria L.

spring, winter

roadsides, uncultivated areas, walls, wetlands

Crocus biflorus Mill.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

pastures, woods

Dioscorea communis L. Caddick. & Wikin

spring, summer

hedges, shrubby areas, woods

Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) Dc.

autumn, winter

cultivated areas, roadsides

Diplotaxis harra (Forssk.) Boiss.

summer

cultivated areas, fields

Echium vulgare L.

spring

pastures, roadsides

Elymus repens (L.) Gould.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

escarpments, meadows, uncultivated areas

Equisetum arvense L.

spring, winter

meadows, roadsides, shrubby areas, woods

Erodium moschatum (L.) L'Hér

spring

fields, rocky slopes

Fedia cornucopiae (L.) Gaertn.

spring, winter

cultivated areas, pastures, roadsides

Foeniculum vulgare Miller

spring, winter

cultivated areas, fields, meadows

Fragaria vesca L.

spring, summer

escarpments, woods

Gladiolus italicus Mill.

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, rocky slopes

Globularia alypum L.

spring, winter

rocky slopes, woods

Glycirrhiza glabra L.

spring, summer

fields, maquis, woods

Helianthus tuberosus L.

winter

meadows, roadsides, wetlands, woods

Heliotropium europaeum L.

autumn, spring, winter

grassland, uncultivated area

Helminthotheca echioides (L.) Holub

spring

cultivated areas, roadsides

Hyoseris radiata L.

spring, winter

fields, pastures, roadsides

Hypochoeris radicata L.

autumn, spring, winter

dry meadows, pastures, roadsides

Isatis tinctoria L.

spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Lactuca viminea (L.) J. & C. Presl

autumn, spring, winter

hedges, roadsides, shrubby areas, uncultivated areas

Lathyrus clymenum L.

spring

fields, roadsides, woods

Lathyrus sativus L.

spring

fields, roadsides, woods

Laurus nobilis L.

autumn, summer

maquis, meadows, woods

Leopoldia comosa (L.) Parl.

spring

cultivated areas, grassland

Lycium europaeum L.

spring

maquis, coastal zones

Malva sylvestris L.

autumn, spring, winter

meadows, uncultivated areas

Marrubium vulgare L.

spring, summer

cultivated areas, pastures, rangeland

Mentha pulegium L.

spring, summer

wetlands, wet meadows

Mentha spicata L.

spring, summer

wetlands

Muscari botryoides (L.) Mill.

spring

fields, roadsides, broadleaf woods

Nasturtium officinale R. Br.

spring

wetlands

Nepeta cataria L.

spring, winter

hedges, roadsides, shrubby areas, uncultivated areas

Notobasis syriaca (L.) Cass.

spring, winter

pastures, roadsides, uncultivated areas

Oenanthe pimpinelloides L.

spring, summer

damp and dry grassland

Onopordum illyricum L.

autumn, spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Origanum vulgare L.

summer

escarpments, fields, hedges, maquis, woods

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller

autumn, spring, summer

cultivated areas, rocky fields

Orobanche crenata Forssk

spring

cultivated areas

Oxalis pes-caprae L.

spring, winter

fields, grassland, landscaped areas

Parietaria officinalis L.

autumn, spring, summer

roadsides, uncultivated areas, walls

Phlomis fruticosa L.

spring, summer, autumn

hedges, maquis, woods

Plantago coronopus L.

spring

escarpments, rocky slopes

Plantago lagopus L.

autumn, winter

escarpments, roadsides, uncultivated areas

Polygonatum multiflorum (L.) All.

spring

woods

Polypodium vulgare L.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

rocky slopes, uncultivated areas, woods

Portulaca oleracea L.

spring, summer

cultivated areas, meadows

Raphanus raphanistrum L.

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, grassland, fields, roadsides

Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, dry meadows, walls

Rosa canina L.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

hedges, woods

Rosmarinus officinalis L.

autumn, spring, summer, winter

cultivated areas, escarpments, fields, hedges, maquis, woods

Rubus ulmifolius Schott

spring, summer

maquis, hedges, woods

Ruscus aculeatus L.

autumn, spring, winter

maquis, woods

Scabiosa columbaria L.

winter

grassland, pastures, rocky slopes

Scolymus grandiflorus Desf.

spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas, walls

Scolymus hispanicus L.

spring

roadsides, walls

Scolymus maculatus L.

spring

fields, roadsides, rocky slopes

Scorzonera hispanica L.

spring, winter

fields, rocky slopes, uncultivated areas

Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke

spring

grassland, hedges, shrubby areas, woods

Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertner

spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Sinapis alba L.

spring

cultivated areas, fields, roadsides

Sinapis arvensis L.

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, fields

Sinapis pubescens L.

autumn, spring, winter

rocky slopes, uncultivated areas

Sisymbrium rio L.

spring, winter

fields, roadsides

Smilax aspera L.

spring

fields, hedge, maquis, walls

Sonchus asper (L.) Hill

spring, winter

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Sonchus bulbosus (L.) Kilian & Greuter

spring

fields, uncultivated areas

Sonchus oleraceus (L.) L.

spring, winter

fields, pastures, roadsides

Sonchus tenerrimus L.

spring

fields, pastures, uncultivated areas

Taraxacum campylodes G.E. Haglund

autumn, spring, winter

pastures, rocky slopes

Taraxacum minimum (Briganti ex Guss.) N. Terracc.

autumn, spring, winter

pastures, rocky slopes

Teucrium fruticans L.

spring

escarpments, fields, rocky slopes

Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav.

spring, summer

escarpments, rocky slopes, uncultivated areas

Tragopogon porrifolius L.

spring

grassland, roadsides

Trifolium phleoides Willd.

spring

maquis, meadows, uncultivated areas

Urospermum picroides (L.) F.W. Schmidt

winter

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Urtica dioica L.

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, roadsides

Urtica membranacea Poir. ex Savigny

winter

fields, roadsides, uncultivated areas

a Urtica rupestris Guss.

autumn, spring, winter

cultivated areas, roadsides

Urtica urens L.

autumn, spring, summer

fields, roadsides

Verbascum sinuatum L.

spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas

Wisteria sinensis (Sims) Sweet

spring

roadsides, uncultivated areas

aendemism

Most commonly cited wild food plant species

The Cultural Importance Index of the 119 species in the study varied between 0.004 and 0.50 (average value: 0.08) (Appendix).

With regards to the wild food plant species used in each of the Sicilian Regional Parks, the analysis shows that Cichorium intybus L. (C.I. 0.37), Foeniculum vulgare Miller (C.I. 0.31), Borago officinalis L. (C.I. 0.23) and Asparagus acutifolius L. (C.I. 0.21) are the most important species to the local populations in terms of food use (Table 2).
Table 2

Top 10 wild plant species most frequently cited for food purposes and currently used by informants in each of the four Sicilian Regional Parks, shown here the Cultural Importance Index

Plant species

Botanical family

Number of interview in which it was cited

Frequency (%)a

Cultural Importance Index

Cichorium intybus L.

Asteraceae

221

27.55

0.37

Foeniculum vulgare Mill.

Apiaceae

203

25.31

0.31

Borago officinalis L.

Boraginacae

149

18.57

0.23

Asparagus acutifolius L.

Asparagaceae

151

18.82

0.21

Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller.

Cactaceae

143

18.00

0.19

Sonchus oleraceus (L.) L.

Asteraceae

144

17.95

0.19

Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze

Lamiaceae

127

15.83

0.16

Ruscus aculeatus L.

Asparagaceae

79

9.85

0.12

Centaurea solstitialis L. subsp. schouwii (DC.) Gugler

Asteraceae

75

9.35

0.11

Laurus nobilis L.

Lauraceae

75

9.35

0.09

aas a percentage of citations of the total of 802 informants

The results clearly demonstrate that the most frequently-cited species were also those most commonly-used for food purposes by the local people of the Parks involved.

Cichorium intybus was most cited by the people interviewed. The aerial parts and leaves of the species are eaten boiled and the broth is consumed as a drink. The boiled parts are used to prepare salads and soups in other regions of Italy such as Latium [71], Tuscany [72] and Sardinia [73]. In Sicily, the aerial parts of common chicory are also sautéed with eggs and seasoned with olive oil [14]. In the Madonie and Nebrodi Regional Parks in particular, it is widely used for pasta sauces. The aerial parts of Foeniculum vulgare are eaten boiled, seasoned with olive oil and lemon or consumed raw in salad. This food use is also confirmed by various regions in Italy [8, 12, 74] and in several countries in the Mediterranean as reported by [14]. The aerial parts of the species are also an ingredient in a number of traditional Sicilian pasta or meat dishes and soups. The aerial parts of Borago officinalis are eaten boiled and seasoned with olive oil and lemon, or fried in batter by local populations in the 4 Sicilian Parks. The boiled water, seasoned with olive oil, has diuretic and laxative properties, as reported in most of the literature from Italian regions and other Mediterranean countries [75–81]. The young turions of Asparagus acutifolius are eaten boiled and the boiled water consumed seasoned with olive oil. The turions may be fried with onions in omelettes, a dish particularly widespread in the Nebrodi and Monti Sicani Regional Parks but also common throughout Italy. The aerial parts of Sonchus oleraceus (L.) L. are eaten boiled and pan fried in omelettes. Lentini and Venza [14] reported that the young leaves are consumed in salads and soups in various Mediterranean counties such as Crete, Cyprus, Egypt, Spain and Tunisia. Of the more commonly cited species for each of the 4 Sicilian Parks, Laurus nobilis L. (C.I. 0.09) was found to have the lowest Cultural Importance Index. Most of the species had a very low Cultural Importance Index, this would seem to demonstrate that little cultural importance is given to these species as a food. This may be an indication of a fall in TPK (traditional plant knowledge) regarding food uses of plants. However, it would be a mistake to consider those species with a low C.I. index as uninteresting from a culinary point of view in that we would need to take other factors into consideration, such as the lesser or greater availability of the species in the natural habitat, or the greater or lesser use of the plants to cure the most widespread disorders in that same area. When considering the 90 towns in the study area individually, the cultural importance of these species was found to differ between towns, and this highlights the fact that, in quantitative analysis terms, the species is used by the local populations to differing degrees. In this study a total of 119 wild plant species were collected, 109 of which were found to be used for food purposes also in other Italian regions and 75 in the Mediterranean countries taken into consideration. Most previous studies, however, were carried out using different methodologies or in areas which differed in terms of size and floral diversity. When a comparison was made of the wild plant species in this study and those previously cited by Lentini and Venza [14] in Sicily, 65 were found to have been previously cited, whereas 54 appear to be newly mentioned. This is undoubtedly an important result for our study. When comparing the four Regional Parks, only 15 wild plant species were common to all of the parks. Most of the wild food plants were found in the Etna (65) and Nebrodi (62) Regional Parks whilst the fewest in the Sicani Regional Park (39). In general, our research indicates that 6 wild plant species have not been mentioned before in the Mediterranean area for culinary use. With reference to the culinary uses of wild plants, it was found that most of the culinary uses recorded were the same or similar to those in other parts of Sicily, as reported by [14], in other regions of Italy and some Mediterranean countries: Apium nodiflorum (L.) Lag., for example, is eaten in Sicily, Tuscany, Spain and Tunisia. It is worth noting that some culinary uses are typically found in only one Sicilian Park or another, and this would seem to be proof of a slight variation in diet between populations of the same region. The greatest range of culinary uses was found in the Etna (28) and Nebrodi Regional Parks (27). Regarding current use of the species cited in the study, 28.57 % of the species are still used today whilst the remaining part can be considered to have fallen out of use. Concerning the perceived degree of usefulness of the species for food purposes, and referring only to those species currently used by the local populations, Concerning the perceived degree of usefulness of the species for food purposes, and referring to those species currently used by the local populations, 59.66 % of the culinary uses were highly appreciated by the informants whilst only 54.62 % of the culinary uses were little appreciated. Some wild plants were recorded by the informants as being both highly and little appreciated.

Plant parts used and methods of consumption

The aerial parts of the plants are the parts most widely used, followed by leaves, flowers and shoots (Fig. 2); international literature also reports that the aerial parts and leaves are the most commonly used parts for culinary purpose, [14, 80, 81]. Greater accessibility in natural ecosystems of the aboveground parts of the plants and the greater abundance of the leaves compared to other plant parts may explain the higher use-frequency of these plants parts. In most cases, the various parts were used indifferently for the same culinary use only. For example, the leaves and the young shoots of Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke were used in quite the same way: eaten raw in salads or cooked in omelettes, and the aerials parts and flowers of Asphodeline lutea (L.) Rchb. were eaten indifferently, boiled and then fried with eggs. Further on the topic of preparation methods, the wild food species are consumed in a number of different ways: some are cooked whilst others are eaten raw and require only washing. The methods of consumptions are reported in Fig. 3. Most wild plant species are consumed boiled and nearly all (98.7 %) are eaten simply boiled and on their own. The most cited wild plant species eaten boiled are Foeniculum vulgare, Borago officinalis and Asparagus acutifolius. Some wild plant species are consumed fried, especially in the preparation of omelettes. In the Monti Sicani Regional Park, the aerial parts of Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) Dc. are typically fried with eggs and lemon in omelettes, and in the Nebrodi Regional Park the bulbs of Leopoldia comosa (L.) Parl. are sautéed with eggs to prepare traditional dishes as confirmed by [14]. A high number of plant species are consumed raw, most in salads. The aerial parts of Portulaca oleracea L., the young shoots of Clematis vitalba L., the leaves of Nasturtium officinale R. Br. are usually served with a little olive oil, salt and vinegar. Other species like Allium spp. and Foeniculum vulgare are used fresh with tomato and bread. Some wild plant species are consumed fried, especially in the preparation of omelettes. In the Monti Sicani Regional Park, the aerial parts of Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) Dc. are typically fried with eggs and lemon in omelettes, and in the Nebrodi Regional Park the bulbs of Leopoldia comosa (L.) Parl. are sautéed with eggs to prepare traditional dishes as confirmed by [14]. A high number of plant species are consumed raw, most in salads. The aerial parts of Portulaca oleracea L., the young shoots of Clematis vitalba L., the leaves of Nasturtium officinale R. Br. are usually served with a little olive oil, salt and vinegar. Other species like Allium spp. and Foeniculum vulgare are used fresh with tomato and bread. Some plants are consumed as fresh fruit: Fragaria vesca L. in Etna Regional Park and Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller in the Madonie Regional Park. Fruits are also used to make cakes and preserves. Twelve plant species are used to prepare sauces for traditional Sicilian pasta recipes. The most representative are Foeniculum vulgare, Asparagus spp., Sonchus spp., Borago officinalis and Capparis spinosa L. Some aromatic plants are gathered in the wild and consumed steadily throughout during the year. The highly aromatic species Origanum vulgare L., Rosmarinus officinalis and Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav. are examples of such, commonly used to flavour traditional Sicilian dishes. Only two plants species are used for alcoholic beverages: in the Etna and Nebrodi Regional Parks, Mentha pulegium L. and Mentha spicata L. are traditionally used to make liqueurs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Frequency of plant parts used for food uses

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Main methods of consumption of the wild food plant species in the study area

Food/medicinal wild plant species

Of the 119 wild plant species in this study, 64 were recorded as having therapeutic effects (Appendix). According to the informants, the dishes prepared and aromatized with these plants have additional health properties, in addition to that of nutrition. When considering 188 wild plant species used in traditional Sicilian cuisine, Lentini and Venza [14] noted that the majority were also used for medicinal purposes by the local populations. Similarities were found between their findings and the results of our study concerning plant species with food/medicinal properties, methods of consumption and medical-use preparation methods. Traditionally, food is often considered to be medicinal in Sicily, as remarked upon by [14], and the food use of a given species may also be seen as curative, depending on the gravity of the disorder. Guarrera and Savo [82] remark that wild food plants are often consumed for their health-giving or medicinal properties also in other parts of Italy. Furthermore, this strong relationship between food and medicinal uses according to [81] and [83], could help in developing of foods for functional, nutraceutical and medicinal purposes.

Clinopodium nepeta (L.) Kuntze was the species most cited by the populations of both the Etna and Nebrodi Regional Parks. The broth obtained from the aerial parts of the species is used to cure internal haemorrhoids. Singh et al. [84] note that the essential oil of Clinopodium nepeta contains 64 pharmacologically active compounds which give the species antibacterial, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

Cichorium intybus was the most-cited species by the populations of the Madonie and Monti Sicani Regional Parks. The aerial parts of this plant species are commonly boiled and eaten for their good flavour, but also as a bland diuretic, particularly highly appreciated by the local people. The same use was reported by [14]. The plant contains several active principles and is generally retained depurative and healthy as many other plants with a bitter taste. Cichorium intybus is well known in other Italian regions [12, 40, 76, 82], but also in Morocco [85], in Tunisia [78] and in Spain [70].

Several aromatic plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family were particularly highly-appreciated for their therapeutic effects by the informants. Origanum vulgare is an example of such; used in many traditional Sicilian recipes as flavouring in salads, or roast/fried fish and meats, it is also considered to be an important medicinal plant by the local populations, helping to fight colds, flu and stomachache [14]. Several studies carried out in Sicily on wild oregano plants in fact confirmed the antioxidant effect of the essential oils [86–88]. Other aromatic species, noted for their culinary and therapeutic uses, include Rosmarinus officinalis and Thymbra capitata; the leaves of both of these species are used to flavor vegetables, roast meats etc. A decoction of the aerial parts of rosemary is considered to be particularly effective in the treatment of asthma and gastric disorders; an observation commonly made in both Italian and world literature [89–92]. An infusion of thyme leaves is thought effective against coughs and colds, and in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Research has found, however, that the quality and quantity of essential oil (which is responsible for the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the species) contained in wild rosemary and thyme, can vary considerably and appears to be significantly affected by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors to the species [93–95].

The culinary use of Laurus nobilis is extremely common throughout the study area. The fresh and dried leaves of the species are used for their distinctive flavor and fragrance. However, the species is also considered medicinal: laurel leaf infusions are used to help digestion, as noted in literature from Sicily [14], Italian regions and other Mediterranean countries [66, 91, 96]. Speroni et al. [97], in a study carried out on the gastro-protective effects and antioxidant properties of leaf extracts of laurel, noted that there seems to be a relationship between the pharmacological effectiveness of these species and its antiradical activity.

Agriculture and wild food plant species

The local populations have very good knowledge of the cultivation techniques of small number of wild plant species and have wide experience with many agronomic practices such as soil preparation, crop rotation, sowing, fertilization, irrigation, diseases and pests and harvesting. Organic farming practices are also highy appreciated by the informants. In many towns of the Madonie Regional Park, common chicory and starflower are commonly grown in kitchen gardens and the most used cultivation techniques for these crops are similar to that of spinach and salad rocket. The increasing importance of fennel in the Mediterranean diet has encouraged many aromatic plant producers to breed and commercialize the species in pots. The cultivation of cactus pear is especially widespread in the Etna Regional Park and, on a European level, cactus pear processing is only found in Sicily. The success of this Sicilian production sector is the result of excellent quality fruit, but also in part due to the recent adoption of low-impact cultivation techniques, such as fertilisation, irrigation and thinning, which traditionally were not practiced on this species. In recent years, in the most productive agricultural areas of Sicily, cactus pear crops have been cultivated with irrigation, greatly improving fruit quality.

Laurel is grown in kitchen gardens and farms for the production of aromatic plants. Regarding all the 119 wild plant species, it is important to note that the majority are not cultivated and only a small number are cultivated or could be cultivated in kitchen gardens and crop fields. Another point worth highlighting is the fact that agronomic practices often affect organoleptic and nutritional properties of the plant parts. This may depend on how extensive cultivation is: the more intensive production, the greater the probability of a change occurring in the nutritional properties of the food. Many informants commented on the fact that wild plant species were beneficial to human health because they were not contaminated by fertilizers and pesticides, and that they contained large amounts of nutrients and active principles. Vice versa informants stated that the domesticated plants were not grown naturally and could possibly contain substances harmful to health as a result of human intervention. Most of the informants perceived that plants cultivated in own-kitchen gardens were better than those produced in intensive farming. However, from an agronomic point of view, the domestication of wild plant species, using low impact cultivation techniques, represents a point of interest for sustainable agriculture in order to obtain a high quality foods for human consumption. Nowadays, many consumers want to know more about the food they eat and look for high quality. Agriculture needs to ensure organoleptic stability of a wild plant species when cultivated on a large scale. The first step is to protect the plant genetic resources through ex situ conservation, and the second is to establish cultivation protocols for the wild plant species. In this way, it is possible to select wild plant species with agronomic interest for food/medicinal uses.

Conclusions

This study carried out in 4 Regional Parks in Sicily shows that the culinary use of wild shrub and herbaceous plants is not a predominant part of the food culture of the local populations. Most of the species were not found in all of the Sicilian Parks and the number of total citations per species was, in general, very low: sign of an on-going process of the cultural erosion. The lack of homogeneity in the number of women and men in the interview group may have affected some results of the study; in particular, the under-representation of women in the sample of informants is most likely to have contributed to lower quantities of detailed information, for example on the methods of consumption of wild plants. The study found that only very few wild plants are widely used for food use by the elderly populations of the study area and, on many occasions, their consumption is due to the fact that wild plants are used both for food and medicinal purposes. This confirms the fact that, in Sicily, some foods are believed to have a natural, therapeutic effect and the food use of one species or another is considered curative of various disorders. Quantitative analysis shows that the plants that have the greatest probability of survival over time as a source of food are those at the interface of food and medicine, and not those used solely as a food. Comparative analysis with other Mediterranean regions indicates that 6 wild food species have not been mentioned previously in the literature of the references countries and would seem to be novel in culinary terms. In terms of agriculture, it is important to highlight that given the fact that only very few of the wild plants mentioned can/could be cultivated in kitchen gardens and/or crop fields, further agronomic research on these few species is essential in order to improve knowledge on their main cultivation techniques. An important result of the research is the fact that most of the wild plants are perceived as highly useful for food/medicinal purposes and this is due to the health effects of the wild plants as reported by the informants. The protection of the native genetic resources and the culinary traditions linked to them is essential if we are to preserve the cultural heritage of the Sicilian Parks concerning the food use of wild plant species and in order to cultivate a number of species of agricultural interest. Our contribution should be not considered as exhaustive and future research is necessary in order to extend investigation to the younger generations and comment on the transmission of knowledge from the old to the new generation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all those who took part in the interviews in the 90 towns in the 4 Sicilian Regional Parks who contributed to the study with their knowledge and without which it would not have been possible to complete this study. A special thanks goes to Ms. Branwen Hornsby for her linguistic assistance. We would also like to thank the Sicilian Regional Ministry of Agricultural and Food Resources for funding the research and the Research Centre Corissia where the specimen vouchers were deposited.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze 13, 90128 Palermo, Italy

References

  1. Paniangvait P, King AJ, Jones AD, German BG. Cholesterol oxides in foods of animal origin. J Food Sci. 1995;60:1159–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lentini F, Venza F. Valorizzazione delle piante selvatiche di uso alimentare in Sicilia. Atti del II Convegno nazionale italiano Piante Mediterranee: Valorizzazione delle Risorse e Sviluppo Sostenibile. Corissia;Agrigento (Italy). 2007.Google Scholar
  3. McLaughlin A, Mineau P. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agr Ecosyst Env. 1995;55:201–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Reidsma P, Tekelenburg T, van den Berg M, Alkemade R. Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: An assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agr Ecosyst Env. 2006;114:86–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, et al. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – A review. J Environ Manage. 2009;91:22:46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB, et al. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol. 2010;11:97–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sansanelli S, Tassoni A. Wild food plants traditionally consumed in the area of Bologna (Emilia Romagna region, Italy). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:69.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pieroni A. Medicinal plants and food medicines in the folk traditions of the upper Lucca Province. Italy J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;70:235–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pieroni A, Nebel S, Santoro RF, Heinrich M. Food for two seasons: Culinary uses of non-cultivated local vegetables and mushrooms in a south Italian village. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005;56(4):245–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rivera D, Obon C, Inocencio C, Heinrich M, Verde A, Fajardo J, et al. The ethnobotanical study of local Mediterranean food plants as medicinal resources in southern Spain. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56(1):97–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Della A, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D, Ch HA. An ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants of Paphos and Larnaca countryside of Cyprus. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guarrera PM, Salerno G, Caneva G. Food, flavouring and feed plant traditions in the Tyrrenhian sector of Basilicata, Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2:37.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonti M, Nebel S, Rivera D, Heinrich M. Wild gathered food plants in the European Mediterranean: A comparative analysis. Econ Bot. 2006;60:130–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lentini F, Venza F. Wild food plants of popular use in Sicily. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Cultural Importance Index: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ Bot. 2008;62:24–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Signorini MA, Piredda M, Bruschi P. Plants and traditional knowledge: An ethnobotanical investigation on Monte Orbene (Nuoro, Sardinia). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pieroni A, Janiak V, Dürr CM, Lüdeke S, Trachsel E, Heinrich M. In vitro antioxidant activity of non-cultivated vegetables of ethnic Albanians in Southern Italy. Phytother Res. 2002;16:467–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Conforti F, Statti G, Uzunov D, Menichini F. Comparative chemical composition and antioxidant activities of wild and cultivated Laurus nobilis L. leaves and Foeniculum vulgare subsp. piperitum (Ucria) Coutinho seeds. Biol Pharm Bul. 2006;10:2056–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Giovanelli G, Buratti S. Comparison of polyphenolic composition and antioxidant activity of wild Italian blueberries and some cultivated varieties. Food Chem. 2009;112:903–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Trichopoulou A, Vasilopouloua E, Hollmanb P, Chamalidesc C, Foufac E, Kaloudisd T, et al. Nutritional composition and flavonoid content of edible wild greens and green pies: a potential rich sources of antioxidant nutrients in the Mediterranean diet. Food Chem. 2000;70:319–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Guil J, Gimenez I, Torija M. Mineral nutrient composition of edible wild plants. J Food Compost Anal. 1998;11:322–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaffer S, Schmitt-Schillig S, Müller WE, Eckert GP. Antioxidant properties of Mediterranean food plant extracts: geographical differences. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005;56:115–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heimler D, Isolani L, Vignolini P, Romani A. Polyphenol content and antiradical activity of Cichorium intybus L. from biodynamic and conventional farming. Food Chem. 2009;114:765–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Simopoulos A. Omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants in edible wild plants. Biol Res. 2004;37:263–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Heinrich M, Nebel S, Leonti M, Rivera D, Obon C. Local Food- Nutraceuticals’: bringing the gap between local knowledge and global needs. Forum Nutr. 2006;59:1–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Araruna K, Carlos B. Anti-inflammatory activities of triterpene lactones from Lactuca sativa. Phytopharmacology. 2010;1:1–6.Google Scholar
  27. Ranfa A, Bodesmo M, Cappelli C, Quaglia M, Falistocco E, Burini G, et al. Aspetti fitoecologici e nutrizionali di alcune specie vegetali spontanee in Umbria per la conoscenza, recupero e valorizzazione di risorse ambientali. Perugia: Tipografia Grifo; 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Ranfa A, Maurizi A, Romano B, Bodesmo M. The importance of traditional uses and nutraceutical aspects of some edible wild plants in human nutrition: the case of Umbria (central Italy). Plant Biosyst. 2014;148:297–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sánchez-Mata MC, Loera RDC, Morales P, Fernández-Ruiz V, Cámara M, Marqués CD, et al. Wild vegetables of the Mediterranean area as valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012;59:431–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pereira C, Barros L, Carvalho AM, Ferreira ICFR. Nutritional composition and bioactive properties of commonly consumed wild greens: potential sources for new trends in modern diets. Food Res Int. 2011;44:2634–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Manios Y, Detopoulou V, Visioli F, Galli C. Mediterranean diet as a nutrition education and dietary guide: misconceptions and the neglected role of locally consumed foods and wild green plants. Forum of Nutr. 2008;59:154–70.Google Scholar
  32. Panzani P, Rossetto M, De Marco V, Sacchetti LE, Paoletti MG, Rigo A. Wild Mediterranean plants as traditional food: a valuable source of antioxidants. J Food Sci. 2011;76(1):46–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Hadjichambis ACH, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D, Della A, Giusti M, De Pasquale C, Lenzarini C, et al. Wild and semidomesticated food plant consumption in seven circum- Mediterranean areas. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008;59(5):383–414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ladio AH, Lozada M. Comparison of wild edible plant diversity and foraging strategies in two aboriginal communities of northwestern Patagonia. Biodivers Conserv. 2003;12:937–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Raimondo FM, Lentini F. Indagini etnobotaniche in Sicilia I. Le piante della flora locale nella tradizione popolare delle Madonie (Palermo). Naturalista siciliano. 1990;XIV(3-4):77–99.Google Scholar
  36. Lentini F, Raimondo FM. Indagini etnobotaniche in Sicilia. IV. L’uso tradizionale delle piante nel territorio di Mistretta (Messina). Quaderni di Botanica Ambientale Applicata. 1990;1:103–17.Google Scholar
  37. Ilardi V, Raimondo FM. L’uso tradizionale delle piante nella comunità rurale di Mezzojuso (Palermo). Quaderni di Botanica Ambientale Applicata. 1992;3:41–51.Google Scholar
  38. Amico FP, Sorge EG. Medicinal plants and phytotherapy in Mussomeli area (Caltanissetta, Sicily, m Italy). Fitoterapia. 1997;2:143–59.Google Scholar
  39. Arcidiacono S, Napoli M, Pavone P. Piante selvatiche utilizzate nella medicina e nella veterinaria popolari nel territorio di Bronte (Catania). Quaderni di Botanica Ambientale Applicata. 1999;10:105–18.Google Scholar
  40. Lentini F. The role of ethnobotanics in scientific research. State of ethnobotanical knowledge in Sicily. Fitoterapia. 2000;71:83–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Arcidiacono S. Flora popolare nel territorio di Bronte. In: Etnobotanica nella provincia di Catania. Siracusa, Italy: Editore Nuova Zangara Stampa; 2002.Google Scholar
  42. Barbagallo C, Meli R, Savoca F, Nicotra M. Indagine sugli usi popolari delle piante medicinali nella Sicilia centro-orientale. Bollettino Accademia Gioinenia di Scienze Naturali. 2004;37(364):83–157.Google Scholar
  43. Leto C, Tuttolomondo T, La Bella S, Licata M. Ethnobotanical study in the Madonie Regional Park (Central Sicily, Italy). Medicinal use of wild shrub and herbaceous plant species. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146:90–112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tuttolomondo T, Licata M, Leto C, Bonsangue G, Gargano ML, Venturella G, et al. Popular uses of wild plant species for medicinal purposes in the Nebrodi Regional Park (North-Eastern Sicily, Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;157:21–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tuttolomondo T, Licata M, Leto C, Gargano ML, Venturella G, La Bella S. Plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge on medicinal use of wild shrub and herbaceous plant species in the Etna Regional Park (Easter Sicily, Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;155:1362–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tuttolomondo T, Licata M, Leto C, Savo V, Bonsangue G, Gargano ML, et al. Ethnobotanical investigation on wild medicinal plants in the Monti Sicani Regional Park (Sicily, Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;153:568–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lentini F. L’etnobotanica in Sicilia: Le piante di uso popolare. Atti del Convegno Andar per verdure. Linguaglossa (Catania, Italy); 1998.Google Scholar
  48. Rivas-Martinez S. Bioclimatic Belts of West Europe. In: Duplessy JC, Pons A., Fantechi R. (eds). Climate and Global Change. Commission of the European Communities. EUR 13149; Bruxelles (Belgium); 1991. p. 225-249.Google Scholar
  49. Agnesi V, Conoscenti C. Inquadramento geografico, in: Guida geologica del Parco delle Madonie. Palermo, Italy: Priulla S.r.l; 2004.Google Scholar
  50. Raimondo FM, Schicchi R, Surano N. Carta del paesaggio e della biodiversità vegetale del Parco delle Madonie (Sicilia). Naturalista Siciliano. 2014;IV XXVIII(1):71–137.Google Scholar
  51. Raimondo FM, Domina G, Spadaro V. Checklist of the vascular flora of Sicily. Quaderno Botanica Ambientale Applicata. 2010;21:189–252.Google Scholar
  52. Alaimo F. Parco dei Nebrodi. Palermo, Italy: Fabio Orlando Editore; 1995.Google Scholar
  53. Poli Marchese E. Il contributo dei Parchi dell’Etna e dell’Alcantara alla conservazione della biodiversità. Naturalista Siciliano. 2004;XXVIII(1):165–81.Google Scholar
  54. Caltagirone G. Diagnosi territoriale dell’area sicana. Palermo, Italy: Assessorato Agricoltura e Foreste della Regione Siciliana; 1998.Google Scholar
  55. Akerreta S, Cavero RY, Calvo MI. First comprehensive contribution to medical ethnobotany of Western Pyrenees. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:26.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. ISE International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). www.ethnobiology.net/ethics.php; 2006.
  57. Rosenthal JP. Politics, culture and governance in the development of prior informed consent in indigenous communities. Curr Anthropol. 2006;47(1):119–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pignatti S. Flora d’Italia. Bologna, Italy: Edagricole; 2003.Google Scholar
  59. The Plant List. www.theplantlist.org
  60. Tropicos. www.tropicos.org
  61. Hardy ML. Herbs of special interest to women. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2000;40:234–42.Google Scholar
  62. Scherrer AM, Motti R, Weckerle CS. Traditional plant use in the areas of Monte Vesole and Ascea, Cilento National Park (Campania, Southern Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97:129–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Motti R, Antiguani V, Idolo M. Traditional plant use in the Phlegraean Fields Regional Park (Campania, Southern Italy). Hum Ecol. 2009;37:775–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Guarino C, De Simone L, Santoro S. Ethnobotanical study of the Sannio area, Campania, Southern Italy. Ethnobotany Res Appl. 2008;6:255–317.Google Scholar
  65. Bonet MÀ, Parada M, Selga A, Vallès J. Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the regions of L'Alt Empordá and Les Guilleries (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). J Ethnopharmacol. 1999;68:145–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Savo V, Caneva G, Guarrera PM, Reedy D. Folk phytotherapy of the Amalfi Coast (Campania, Southern Italy). J Ethopharmacol. 2011;135:376–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Tardío J, Pascual H, Morales R. Wild food plants traditionally used in the province of Madrid. Central Spain Econ Bot. 2005;59(2):122–36.Google Scholar
  68. Ali-Shtayeh MS, Jamous RM, Al-Shafie’ JH, Elgharabah WA, Kherfan FA, Qarariah KH, et al. Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in Palestine. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008;4:13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Agelet A, Vallés J. Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region of Pallars (Pyrenees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Part I. General results and new or very rare medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;77:57–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Benìtez G, Gonzàlez-Tejero MR, Molero-Mesa J. Pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the western part of Granada province (southern Spain): Ethnopharmacological synthesis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;129:87–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Guarrera PM. Food medicine and minor nourishment in the folk traditions of Central Italy (Marche, Abruzzo and Latium). Fitoterapia. 2003;74:515–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pieroni A. Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild foods botanicals traditionally consumed in Northwestern Tuscany. Italy J Ethnobiol. 2001;21:89–104.Google Scholar
  73. Atzei AD. Le piante nella tradizione popolare della Sardegna. Sassari, Italy: Carlo Delfino editore; 2003.Google Scholar
  74. Guarrera PM, Manzi A. Wild plants of organoleptic or nutritional interest and food traditions in central Italy: some interesting cases. Plant Genetic Research. 2005;3(3):322–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Uncini Manganelli RE, Tomei PE. Ethnopharmabotanical studies of the Tuscan Archipelago. J Ethnopharmacol. 199; 65:181-202.Google Scholar
  76. Passalacqua NG, Guarrera PM, De Fine G. Contribution to the knowledge of the folk plant medicine in Calabria region (Southern Italy). Fitoterapia. 2007;78:52–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. De Natale A, Pollio A. Plant species in the folk medicine of Montecorvino Rovella (inland Campania, Italy). J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;109:295–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Leporatti ML, Ghedira K. Comparative analysis of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in Italy and Tunisia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5:31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Merzouki A, Ed-derfoufi F, Molero-Mesa J. Contribution to the knowledge of Rifian traditional medicine. II: Folk medicine in Ksar Lakbir district (NW Morocco). Fitoterapia. 2000;71:278–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Neves JM, Matos C, Moutinho C, Queiroz G, Gomes LR. Ethnopharmacological notes about ancient uses of medicinal plants in Tras-os-Montes (northern of Portugal). J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;124:270–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Bonet MA, Vallès J. Use of non-crop food vascular plants in Montseny biosphere reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2002;53:225–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Guarrera PM, Savo V. Perceived health properties of wild and cultivated food plants in local and popular traditions of Italy: a Review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146:659–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Etkin N, Johns TJ. “Pharmafoods” and “nutraceuticals”: paradigm shifts in biotherapeutics. In: Predergast HDV, Etkin NL, Harris DR, Houghton PJ. (Eds.), Plants for Food and Medicine. Royal Botanic Gardens; Kew.; 1998. p. 3-16.Google Scholar
  84. Singh PP, Jha S, Irchhaiya R, Fatima A, Agarwal P. A review on phytochemical and pharmacological potential of Calamintha officinalis Moench. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2012;3(4):1001–4.Google Scholar
  85. Jouad H, Haloui M, Rhiouani H, El Hilaly J, Eddouks M. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes, cardiac and renal diseases in the North centre region of Morocco (Fez–Boulemane). J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;77:175–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Tuttolomondo T, La Bella S, Licata M, Virga G, Leto C, Saija A, et al. Biomolecular characterization of wild Sicilian oregano: phytochemical screening of essential oils and extracts, and evaluation of their antioxidant activities. Chem Biodivers. 2013;10:411–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Tuttolomondo T, Leto C, Leone R, Licata M, Virga G, Ruberto G, et al. Essential oil characteristics of wild Sicilian oregano populations in relation to environmental conditions. J Essent Oil Res. 2014;26(3):210–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Licata M, Tuttolomondo T, Dugo G, Ruberto G, Leto C, Napoli EM, et al. Study of quantitative and qualitative variations in essential oils of Sicilian oregano biotypes. J Essent Oil Res. 2015;27(4):293–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. AbouZid SF, Mohamed AM. Survey on medicinal plants and spices used in Beni-Sueif. Upper Egypt J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. El-Hilaly J, Hmammouchi M, Lyoussi B. Ethnobotanical studies and economic evaluation of medicinal plants in Taounate province (Northern Morocco). J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;86:149–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. González-Tejero MR, Casares-Porcel M, Sanchez-Rojas CP, Ramiro-Gutierrez GM, Molero-Mesa J, Pieroni A, et al. Medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: synthesis of the results of the project Rubia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116:341–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Guarrera PM, Leporatti ML. Ethnobotanical remarks on Central and Southern Italy. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Tuttolomondo T, Dugo G, Ruberto G, Leto C, Napoli EM, Cicero N, et al. Study of quantitative and qualitative variations in essential oils of Sicilian Rosmarinus officinalis L. Nat Prod Res. Article in press. doi:10.1080/14786419.2015.1010084; 2015.
  94. Tuttolomondo T, Dugo G, Leto C, Cicero N, Tropea A, Virga G, et al. Agronomical and chemical characterisation of Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav. biotypes from Sicily, Italy. Nat Prod Res. 2015;29(14):1289–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Napoli EM, Siracusa L, Saija A, Speciale A, Trombetta D, Tuttolomondo T, et al. Wild Sicilian rosemary: phytochemical and morphological screening and antioxidant activity evaluation of extracts and essential oils. Chem Biodivers. 2015;12(7):1075–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Savo V, Joy R, Caneva G, McClatchey WC. Plant selection for ethnobotanical uses on the Amalfi Coast (Southern Italy). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Speroni E, Cervellati R, Dall’Acqua S, Guerra MC, Greco E, Govoni P, et al. Gastroprotective effect and antioxidant properties of different Laurus nobilis L. leaf extracts. J Med Food. 2011;14(5):499–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Atzei AD, Orioni S, Sotgiu R. Contributo alla conoscenza degli usi etnobotanici nella Gallura (Sardegna). Bollettino della Società Sarda di Scienze Naturali. 1991;28:137–77.Google Scholar
  99. Pieroni A. Gathered wild food plants in the Upper valley of the Serchio river (Garfagnana). Central Italy Econ Bot. 1999;53:327–41.Google Scholar
  100. Guarrera PM. Usi e tradizioni della flora italiana. Roma, Italy: Aracne editrice s.r.l; 2006.Google Scholar
  101. Pieroni A. Evaluation of the cultural significance of wild food botanicals traditionally consumed in Northwestern Tuscany, Italy. J Ethnobiol. 2011;21:89–104.Google Scholar
  102. Ertuğ F. Wild edible plants of the Bodrum area (Muğla, Turkey). Turk J Bot. 2004;28:161–74.Google Scholar
  103. Dogan Y, Baslar S, Ay G, Mert HH. The use of wild edible plants in Western and Central Anatolia (Turkey). Econ Bot. 2004;58(4):684–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Ozbucak TB, Kutbay H, Akcin OE. The contribution of wild edible plants to human in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Ethnobot leaflets. 2006;10:98–103.Google Scholar
  105. Pardo-de-Santayana M, Tardío J, Carvalho AM, Lastra JJ, San Miguel E, Blanco E, Morales R. Diversity and selection of wild food plants in six regions of Northwestern Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal). Proceedings of the IV International Congress of Ethnobotany; Istanbul (Turkey); 2006.Google Scholar
  106. Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M, Morales R. Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Bot J Linn Soc. 2006;152:27–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Pardo-de-Santayana M, Tardio J, Blanco E, Carvalho AM, Lastra JJ, San Miguel E, et al. Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): a comparative study. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:27.Google Scholar
  108. Menendez-Baceta G, Aceituno-Mata L, Tardío J, Reyes-García V, Pardo-de-Santayana M. Wild edible plants traditionally gathered in Gorbeialdea (Biscay, Basque Country). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012;59:1329–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Nassif F, Tanji A. Gathered food plants in Morocco: the long forgotten species in ethnobotanical research. Life Sci Leafl. 2013;3:17–54.Google Scholar
  110. Powell B, Ouarghidi A, Johns T, Tattou MI, Eyzaguirre P. Wild leafy vegetable use and knowledge across multiple sites in Morocco: a case study for transmission of local knowledge? J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Licata et al. 2016

Advertisement

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

ISSN: 1746-4269

Contact us