Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical biocultural diversity by rural communities in the Cuatrociénegas Valley, Coahuila; Mexico

Abstract

Background

Cuatrociénegas, part of the Chihuahuan Desert, is a region of unique biological, geological, geographical, and evolutionary importance. Its current population is mestizo; nevertheless, it has high national historical, cultural, and touristic relevance in Mexico. It has been cataloged as nationally significant for its flora and fauna by Mexican law, as well as being designated a High Protection site by the World Wildlife Fund and UNESCO. Because of its diverse and complex biological and sociocultural characteristics, we considered it important to determine, identify, and analyze various aspects of the traditional ethnobotanical knowledge and practices in this region.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2019, seven field trips were made to document the knowledge and use of flora. Cuatrociénegas is a protected area, collecting botanical material is regulated, so specimens were photographed and collected in neighboring communities, and in public and private gardens. Later permission was obtained to complete the collection of specimens (2019–2020). The plants were identified and entered into the flora database of the state of Coahuila, and deposited in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Forest Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Mexico. One hundred ten local residents (50 men and 60 women), aged between 27 and 91 years, were interviewed (semi-structured interviews). The cultural importance of ethnobotanical resources (cultural significance index) and its significance with respect to ethnobotanical richness in other Biosphere Reserves in Mexico (Mann-Whitney test), and similarities in the diversity of exotic species (Sørensen index) were studied.

Results and discussion

The ethnobotanical information registers 158 species and 132 genera in 57 vascular and non-vascular families, documenting a greater knowledge and use of cultivated species (84) with respect to wild species (74). The diversity of plants reported is compared to other ethnobotanical studies carried out in Mexican Biosphere Reserves. These results are highly relevant, in spite of unique exotic species. The people local pay special attention to medicinal and ornamental plants. The species that presented the highest use values are Larrea tridentata, Jatropha dioica, and Machaeranthera pinnatifida, three species characteristic of the desert region.

Conclusions

The particular diversity of wild flora in Cuatrociénegas Valley, combined with the varied introduced flora, is an important multifunctional resource. Special attention to introduced species is associated with harvesting use restrictions in the protected area as well as the high value of ornamental species that are difficult to maintain in desert areas. The extensive use of ethnobotanical knowledge is an example that biocultural diversity (at the conceptual level) is also strongly associated with socio-ecological systems incorporating mestizo groups and semi-urban rural landscapes, thus ceasing to be an exclusive focus of indigenous communities and regions.

Resumen

Antecedentes

Cuatrociénegas es una región de singular importancia biológica, geológica, geográfica y evolutiva. Forma parte del Desierto de Chihuahua, su población actual es mestiza; sin embargo, posee una alta relevancia histórica, cultural y turística. Ha sido catalogado como Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna por la ley mexicana, así como un sitio de Alta Protección por el Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza y la UNESCO. Por sus complejas características biológicas y socioculturales, consideramos importante conocer, determinar, identificar y analizar los conocimientos y prácticas etnobotánicas tradicionales en esta región.

Métodos

Entre 2016 y 2019 se realizaron siete viajes de campo para documentar el conocimiento y uso de la flora. Cuatrociénegas es un área protegida, la recolección de material botánico está regulada, por lo que se fotografíaron y colectaron especímenes en comunidades aledañas, y en jardines públicos y privados. Posteriormente se obtuvo el permiso para completar la colección de ejemplares (2019-2020). Las plantas fueron identificadas e ingresadas a la base de datos de flora del estado de Coahuila, y depositadas en el Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, México. Se entrevistó a ciento diez vecinos (50 hombres y 60 mujeres) de entre 27 y 91 años (entrevistas semiestructuradas). Se evaluó la importancia cultural de los recursos etnobotánicos (índice de importancia cultural) y su significancia con respecto a la riqueza etnobotánica en otras Reservas de Biosfera en México (prueba de Mann-Whitney) y la similitud en la diversidad de especies exóticas (índice de Sørensen).

Resultados y Discusión

La información etnobotánica registra 158 especies y 132 géneros en 57 familias vasculares y no vasculares, documentando un mayor conocimiento y uso de las especies cultivadas (84) con respecto a las silvestres (74). La diversidad de plantas reportada, en comparación con otros estudios etnobotánicos realizados en Reservas de la Biosfera, es altamente relevante, sin embargo, las especies exóticas son únicas. Los pobladores locales tienen una especial atención a las plantas medicinales y ornamentales. Las especies que presentaron mayores valores de uso son Larrea tridentata, Jatropha dioica y Machaeranthera pinnatifida, tres especies características de la región desértica.

Conclusiones

La particular diversidad de flora silvestre del Valle de Cuatrociénegas, combinada con la variada flora introducida, es un importante recurso multifuncional. La especial atención a las especies introducidas está asociada a las restricciones de aprovechamiento; así como a la alta valoración de especies ornamentales, dificiles de mantener en las zonas desérticas. El amplio conocimiento y uso de la etnobotánica son un ejemplo, que la diversidad biocultural (a nivel conceptual) también, está fuertemente asociada socio-ecologicamente a grupos mestizos y paisajes rurales semiurbanos, dejando de ser exclusiva de las regiones indígenas.

Background

Arid lands in Mexico cover 60% of its area. Mostly, they are concentrated in northern regions [1]. These areas harbor a rich flora adapted to these hostile low rainfall environments [2], which include portions of two major deserts, the Chihuahuan Desert (CHD), and the Sonoran Desert. Cuatrociénegas is a region recognized as a living laboratory by and for the world scientific community. This is due to its outstanding historic, biodiversity, geologic, geographic, and evolutionary components. These characteristics have facilitated the development of research in microbial genomics [3], metagenomics [4], genetic variation, diversity and speciation of fishes [5], virus evolution [6], paleoecology [7], paleoclimate [8], limnology [9], microbial endemism [4], endemic algae [10], speleogensis [11], stratigraphy [12], and flora and vegetation [13, 14]. Cuatrociénegas is one of the few places in the world where stromatolites live, organisms characterized by their antiquity of billions of years [15].

The Cuatrociénegas Basin qualifies as an environment so unique that it has been designated as an “Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna” (Flora and Fauna Protected Area) by the Mexican federal government. The area is administered by the Mexican agency SEMARNAT (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales), and due to its outstanding biodiversity, Cuatrociénegas was declared a protected area in 1994 [16]. It is considered a high-priority site for conservation by the Nature Conservancy, the World Wildlife Fund, and UNESCO, and has been listed as a Wetland of International Importance by Ramsar.

The vegetation types described for the Cuatrociénegas Vallery corresponds mainly to rosetophyllous and microphyllous desert scrub, halophytic, aquatic, and semi-aquatic vegetation of the CHD. These are associated with a floristic diversity of approximately 840 species of vascular plants, of which 12 species are legislatively considered as species at risk within Mexico.

Cuatrociénegas is located in the center of the CHD. Historically, it is important as the birth place of Mexican president Venustiano Carranza (1917–1920) [17]. Economically, the area stands out for its alfalfa forage production and the growing of grapes for white and red wine. One of the most profitable activities is tourism, mainly in connection with multiple thermal pools scattered throughout the area. These are associated with salt accumulation, consisting mainly of sulfates resulting from high evaporation [18]. Because of its culture, architecture, and traditions, this city is included in the list of “Magical Towns.” These are places with unique attributes, including unique symbolism, authentic stories, important historical facts, and charming daily life, all of which means that these towns can enhance their economies by developing even stronger tourism sector.

Cuatrociénegas was founded approximately in 1760. Its actual population is completely mestizo, lacking indigenous populations. However, in the past, the Valley of Cuatrociénegas had been inhabited by nomadic Coahuiltecos and Borrados groups. In the context of this historical biocultural diversity [19], traditional rural communities house biocultural heritage that has been important in the conservation of biological diversity and in ecosystem services [20]. Biocultural diversity helps lend an understanding of human–nature relationships, not only in largely intact indigenous cultural areas but also in urban spaces [21], or in landscapes or semi-urban areas like Cuatrociénegas.

Based on the complex biological and sociocultural characteristics of the study area, we set the following objectives: (i) to collect knowledge from the residents regarding flora species and their uses, (ii) to determine the main type of uses people give for the species, (iii) to identify whether the main species used are native or exotic, (iv) to contribute to understanding of structural elements of biocultural diversity in traditional rural regions, and (v) to contribute to the dissemination of knowledge about traditional ethnobotanical uses as part of preserving the historical cultural heritage of natural resources in semi-arid areas of Mexico.

Methods

Study site

Cuatrociénegas is a small city located in the central region of the state of Coahuila, 26° 42′ 10′′ to 26° 59′ 10′′ N, 101° 52′ 01′′ to 102° 03′ 59′′ W (Fig. 1). Its population is almost 13,000; it has all the modern services of elementary and basic education, social health care, and media and internet, and all the inhabitants speak Spanish. Physiographically, it is located in a valley at 740 m elevation, surrounded by high mountains reaching almost 2,900 m, which belong to the Sierra Madre Oriental range. Its climate is very dry; the most extreme temperatures in the valley reach 44 °C in summer, while in the mountains, the temperature falls below 0 °C in the winter. Annual precipitation is less than 200 mm [22]. Much of the water in the valley comes from groundwater, which emerges in the form of pools and springs; the landscape is characterized by its contrasting wet environments such as wetlands, marshes, underground streams, springs, rivers, lakes, temporary ponds, and groundwater [23]. According to its climate, geological, soil, water, and biological factors, it is considered one of the three most important desert ecoregions in the world [24].

Fig. 1
figure1

Geographic location of Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico. Cuatrociénegas is an important region belonging to the Chihuahuan Desert. Due to its biological, geological, historical and cultural characteristics it is considered a “magical town”

Vegetation and flora

Cuatrociénegas is part of the Chihuahuan Desert and its vegetation, like the flora and vegetation of arid environments, is essentially composed of dispersed shrub species [25]. Vegetation of the Cuatrociénegas Valley include rosetophyllous desert scrub, microphyllous desert scrub, halophytic vegetation, and aquatic and semiaquatic vegetation, with approximately 840 plant species [26], making up at least 25% of the flora of the state of Coahuila [27]. There are at least 70 species of endemic plants and animals in Cuatrociénegas [28].

Ethnobotanical survey

In order to learn about the diversity of flora and its uses in the Cuatrociénegas region, seven field trips were carried out from 2016 to 2019 in order to photograph and record the plants, as well as to carry out ethnographic work. Since Valle de Cuatrociénegas is a protected area, collecting botanical material is regulated; initially, the identification of the plants was through the use of photographs by E. Estrada-Castillón and J.A. Villarreal-Quintanilla, based on a study of the flora of the state of Coahuila [27] and monographs of the genera distributed in this area. Plant specimens were collected from plant communities adjacent to the town, adjacent ejidos, and also from private and public gardens with the owners’ consent. Later, permission was obtained to complete the collection of plant specimens (2019–2020). The plants were identified and entered into the flora database of the Coahuila, as well as in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Forest Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Mexico (the collection number belongs to the first author in Supplementary Material). Based on our experience in other studies, we decided to conduct the interviews by selecting people over 25 years of age or older. The ages of the interviewees ranged from 27 to 91. In order to ensure the reliability and homogeneity of the field information, all the interviewees who were selected were native-born or had lived there continuously for at least 25 years. The interviews were semi-structured in order to elicit the greatest amount of information in each interview and allow the free flow of information by the interviewees without limiting the free expression of ideas regarding species and uses. To this end, several key questions were included: What is the name of the plant? What do you use it for (medicinal, timber, food, fodder, seasoning, ritual)? How do you use it (raw, cooked, boiled, ground, battered)? What part of the plant do you use (root, stems, leaves, bracts, inflorescences, flowers, fruits, seeds, sap)? [29]. The interviews were conducted with the prior informed consent of each of the informants (International Society of Ethnobiology 2006; http://ethnobiology.net/codeofethics/ [30];). The informants were mainly homemakers, shepherds, and retirees, who knew the flora and its uses due to their custom of daily use of the various plants. During interviews were shown photographs of the species and plant specimens collected in private and public gardens and in areas adjacent to the protected area. We asked for the common names of the plants and the uses they are given (ethnographic technique of visual stimuli [29];). Informants were also asked about other wild and cultivated plants they knew and about the species they grew in their gardens. All information was recorded in Spanish, the only language spoken in the region.

Data analysis

To compare the relevance of our study with respect to other ethnobotanical studies carried out in Biosphere Reserves in Mexico with mestizo and indigenous populations, a comparison was made using the Mann-Whitney test, calculated in the statistical program Past 3.20 [31]. The test was based on ethnobotanical data corresponding to the number of families, genera, and species; also included was information such as the extent of the reserve and the types of vegetation. The null hypothesis was rejected when the data of other reserves with respect to ours are similar; when the significance value of the test was less than p < 0.05. Obtaining information for comparison with other Biosphere Reserves in Mexico was carried out through a systematic review in electronic media, using a set of keywords (ethnobotany, protected natural area, Mexico, use, knowledge, plants [32]). On the other hand, to determine the similarity of the introduced species, the Sørensen index [31] was applied, comparing the exotic species with respect to other works in the northeast region and in Biosphere Reserves. Ethnobotanical data in these protected sites is scarce for the North region, especially the Northeast, where our study region is located. Therefore, the compared data are general and not specific to protected sites in areas belonging to the Chihuahuan Desert, where environmental conditions are similar.

In order to obtain and quantify the recorded information, the informant consensus factor (FIC [33];), fidelity level (FL [34];) and use value index (IVU [35];) were calculated. The FIC is an index that measures the relative importance of the different medicinal species for a category of use, and is calculated as FIC = nurnt/nur − 1, where nur = number of uses mentioned, and nt = number of species used in each category. This quantitative technique enables the homogeneity of the information to be determined. Plants that are effective in treating certain diseases will have higher FIC. The fidelity level (FL) or Friedman index estimates the relative importance of each of the medicinal species based on the degree of consensus of the informants about the species’ use against a given category of use. With this index, the preferred species to cure certain diseases can be identified for certain informants; high FL values indicate that the medicinal species used to cure certain illness is widely used for that purpose. The fidelity level is calculated as FL(%) = Ip/Iu(100), where Ip = number of informants who independently indicated the use of a plant for the same particular illness; Iu = number of informants who mentioned the species for any illness within a category of use. The IVU is an index that quantifies the local importance of each of the species, and is calculated as IVU = ∑Ui/n where Ui = the number of uses mentioned by each informant for a given species, and n = the total number of informants.

Results and discussion

Ethnobotanical species diversity

According to the ethnobotanical information collected during interviews, the useful flora of Cuatrociénegas consists of 158 species in 132 genera of 57 vascular and non-vascular families (Table 1). Most of the species are herbaceous (68 species, 43.1%), followed by shrubs (53 species, 33.5%) and trees (37 species, 23.4%). Of the total species, 84 were introduced and 74 were native, which means that the inhabitants of Cuatrociénegas reported that they use more exotic than wild species. This low number of native species may be associated with the prohibition of collecting flora and fauna inside and around the periphery of the reserve. Therefore, the local people have a need to introduce ethnobotanical species that help satisfy their botanical needs, regardless of whether or not they are not locally native. In addition to having this greater appreciation for ornamental introduced species, these species are highly valued for their ease of acquisition and knowledge concerning their adaptations and cultural knowledge that facilitate maintenance. We assume that this ethnobotanical pattern is common in other desert regions of Mexico.

Table 1 Number of families, genera, and species of plants known and used by local residents of Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico

The richness of ethnobotanical species in Cuatrociénegas is similar to that reported in other studies with mestizo communities, showing no significant differences with respect to knowledge and use of flora in Biosphere Reserves in Mexico (Table 2). For example, there is no significant difference between Cuatrociénegas and the ethnobotanical study in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (Ud.f. 9 = 11, n.s [36];), the Sierra de Huahutla Biosphere Reserve (Ud.f. 9 = 12, n.s [37];), or the El Cielo Biosphere Reserve (Ud.f. 9 = 11, n.s [38];). There is also no significant difference when the results are compared with an ethnobotanical study carried out in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve with the Mazahua indigenous group (Ud.f. 9 = 11, n.s [39];). It is important to note the often completely contrasting different types of ecosystems among the reserves; Cuatrociénegas corresponds to characteristics of the Chihuahuan Desert. However, it presents an environmental heterogeneity with different types of vegetation, thus in this sene, it is somewhat similar to Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, which may explain why there are no differences. However, when making comparisons with other Biosphere Reserves such as with Sierra de Huahutla, El Cielo, and even more homogeneous sites such as the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, no differences are shown either, even when the territorial extension of the reserves has been taken into account (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparitive information for Biosphere Reserves in Mexico where ethnobotanical studies have been carried out. These data were obtained from publications [36,37,38,39] and from the catalog of Priority Terrestrial Regions for Mexico, CONABIO

However, in terms of the diversity and the ethnbotanical composition of Cuatrocienegas, and in particular the inclusion of exotic species, the data are unique compared to other sites in Northeast Mexico or Biosphere Reserves, thus showing low similarity [40]. For example, there is a high average similarity with the municipalities of Rayones (0.7663, [41]) and Bustamante (0.6391, [42]) in the neighboring state of Nuevo León. However, the dissimilarity is high compared to regions within the same state of Coahuila, despite maintaining similar ecological characteristics. But here, this dissimilarity occurs with different socio-cultural conditions. For example, with respect to the municipality of Muzquiz (0.3902 [43];), there are the only two indigenous settlements in northeastern Mexico, the Kikapo and the Mascogo blacks. Also, dissimilarity occurs with respect to the Lagunera region (0.1666 [44];), an area geographically close to Cuatrocienegas that has high levels of industrialization, and only some ethnobotanical reports in local markets where the exotic species would be expected to be similar (in terms of their commercialization). In addition, in comparison with the reported sites of the Biosphere Reserves, the similarity patterns remain low: (Cumbres de Monterrey [0.4285; 36]; Reserva de la Biosfera del Cielo [0.3703; 38]; Reserva de la Biosfera de la Mariposa Monarca [0.24; 39]; and Sierra de Huatla [0.1917; 37]). The high dissimilarities confirm that the ethnobotanical data for the Cuatrociénegas Biosphere Reserve are unique and that the exotic species used constitute a unique additional ethnobotanical diversity that seeks to maintain socio-ecological relationships. Therefore, the ethnobotanical richness in Cuatrociénegas is highly characteristic, and is as significant as in other studies, even in regions with the presence of indigenous groups [39]. It represents the importance of ethnobotanical resources in regions of northeast Mexico [36,37,38], and in desert areas.

Cuatrociénegas is an example of the use of ethnobotanical biocultural diversity in traditional mestizo rural regions as a means of cultural resilience. For this reason, the results acquire greater relevance, above all, if we consider that it is mentioned that indigenous groups protect and possess greater knowledge and relationships with nature. However, the history of occupation of a territory by mestizo peoples and their basic needs drive them to maintain a strong relationship between their population and the areas botanical resources. We can assume that ethnobotanical knowledge is not limited by the restrictions imposed in the management plans established in the reserve [16], to the sociocultural changes of semi-urban sites, to the cultural assignment, and even to the environmental characteristics of the region. This reaffirms that cognitive and pragmatic cultural niches are present in mestizo cultural baggage, allowing for the maintenance of socioecological systems.

This information should be taken into account for the redesign of plans for the conservation and management of the local flora in situ in the Cuatrociénegas reserve, considering the local inhabitants as direct actors in the conservation of floristic species. This should lead to generating avenues of action-participation between the government sector, academia, and local people. It is recommended through environmental education strategies, (a) the dissemination of botanical diversity, its knowledge and ethnobotanical applications; (b) the organization of informative action-participation workshops for the identification of native species and the recognition of their biological conservation status; (c) as well as the formation of groups of local producers of plants native and/or cultivated of cultural importance. This would translate into the revaluation and maintenance of ethnobotanical knowledge, sustainable economic opportunities for local people, and greater success in conservation of the characteristic and unique flora of Cuatrociénegas (Fig. 2a–g).

Fig. 2
figure2

ag Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico: a general view of the entrance to the municipal seat; b Ciatrociénegas magical town, celebration of the day of the dead, November 2020; c statue in the central park of the illustrious president Venustiano Carranza, a historical figure; d Brahea dulcis and Bougainvillea glabra, ornamental elements in the atrium of the Parroquia of San José; f conmmemorative plaque “Cuatrociénegas 13 wonders of México,” Septembre 2007; g tree-lined in the central park of the municipal seat, ornamental elements. Author: Tania V. Gutiérrez-Santillán, Novembre 2020

More species were native (95) than exotic (63; Table 3; Supplementary Material). Within the native species, a total of 21 (22%) cultivated species were registered. Several of these species are economically profitable, such as Phaseolus vulgaris, Carya illinoinensis, Persea americana, Zea mays, and Solanum lycopseriscon in northeastern Mexico [36, 40, 41]. Compared to the useful flora from four different areas, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (240 species, 170 genera, 69 families [36];), Southern Nuevo León (163 species, 136 genera, 58 families [40];), Rayones (252 species, 228 genera, 91 families [41];), and Bustamante (218 species, 176 genera, 66 families [42];) in the adjacent state, Nuevo León, Cuatrociénegas, has a lower diversity of all taxa.

Table 3 Plant families, genera, species, and their uses in Cuatrocienegas, Coahuila, Mexico. The letter after author name indicates: N native, E exotic. The collection number belongs to the first author. The complete data of the descripction of the uses and their forms can be consulted in the Supplementary Material. Ornamental (I), Medicinal (II), Condment (III), Food (IV), Forage (V), Fibers (VI), Construction (VII), Fuel (VIII), Craft (IX), Liquor (X), Religious rites (XI), Fright (XII), Industrial (XIII), Wine industry (XIV), Furniture (XV)

This lower species diversity is undoubtedly related to several factors, mainly the homogeneity of the landscape, consisting of a flat valley with a relatively homogeneous climate and soil with a high salt content [45], homogeneous vegetation, at least in the basin, as well as a much smaller area. Except for ornamental trees grown in the urban area, Cuatrociénegas practically lacks wild tree flora, except for several species of Yucca, Prosopis, and Acacia. Of the total species recorded, 95 are native and 61 are exotic. Ten main types of uses with their variants were registered, including ornamental (105 species), medicinal (98 species), food (52 species), forage (34 species), and construction (20 species); the remaining uses are given in Fig. 3. The parts most used by the local residents of Cuatrociénegas for different purposes are leaves, stems, fruits, inflorescences, and flowers; the remaining uses are given in Fig. 4 (Table 3; Supplementary Material).

Fig. 3
figure3

Number of plant species mentioned by the interviewees, organized by use categories

Fig. 4
figure4

Parts of the plant most commonly used for all types of uses in Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico

Multifunctionality of ethnobotanical diversity

The diversity of ethnobotanical taxa (native and introduced) is used efficiently, satisfying a number of harvesting categories [46]. Because the collection of native species in the reserve is controlled and, in some cases, prohibited, a high inclusion of introduced species was observed. Plants have a pattern of multifunctional use; for example, it is observed that different parts of plants (fruits, flowers, and inflorescences) have different modes of use. This ethnobotanical multifunctionality, the number of reported species (n = 158), the type of ecosystem (Chihuahuan Desert), the mestizo communities, and the study area under the different protection categories all provide elements to support biocultural diversity in a broad sense, not restricted to the spatial correlation of the cultural, biological, and linguistic components [47]. Rather, it is made locally by the diversity of species (in this case, ethnobotany) included in the different socio-ecological systems [19]. In addition, traditional mestizo rural landscapes house biocultural heritage and play an important role in biodiversity conservation [20]. Moreover, the persistence of these rural landscapes depends directly on their maintenance and management, and traditional uses by the local population [48]. The importance of extrapolating the concept of biocultural diversity in urban sites as an explanation of the nature–society relationship must also be taken into account [21]; in this case, the relationship between traditional and semi-urban rural societies.

Ornamental

The 105 ornamental species, 64 native and 41 exotics, had the highest number of mentions of use in Cuatrociénegas. These plants play an important role in beautification of the regional landscape, mainly along streets and in public and private properties; the role of these cultivated plants in emerging countries has been reported [49]; they are commonly used as germoplasm reservoirs [50] and are found in multipurpose gardens [51], including medicinal, aesthetic, and edible [52]. Most ornamental species recorded are shrubs (39 species) and trees (37 species), while herbaceous plants account for 29 species. According to the interviewees, these elements were selected for one or several morphological, phenological, or phenotypic characteristics, highlighting the leaves (33 species), stems (28 species), inflorescences (20 species), or flowers (22 species), or a combination of several of these features (Supplementary Material); however, quantitatively, the tree species were the most commonly used and most frequently planted in many public squares and along sidewalks. Fraxinus americana was the most frequent species in streets, gardens and public squares, followed by Morus celtidifolia, especially the male plant since the female trees are not as preferred because when the fruits mature, they fall and stain the sidewalks when they are stepped on. Other common cultivated species are Casuarina cunninghamiana, Platanus occidentalis, Carya illinoinensis, Eriobotrya japonica, Cupressus sempervirens, and Ligustrum japonicum. In private gardens, the most frequent ornamental tree species were those that are also used as a source of food, for their edible fruits. Among these species are Prunus persica, Persea americana, Prunus armeniaca, Punica granatum, Citrus sinensis, C. × limon, Populus alba, and Ficus carica. Most of these species are also grown in southern Nuevo León, Mexico [40], and southern Mexico, including species of Cucurbita and Citrus as well as Carica and Zea. Some shrubby species are locally abundant in private gardens, notably Nerium oleander and Casacabela thevetia. Even empirically, people know about the toxicity of Nerium olenader, since it is known that two of its components, the cardiac glycosides olenadrine and neriine [53], could be deadly if ingested or even smoked. It is widely planted in many private gardens in Cuatrociénegas, and also in the south of Mexico. The toxic properties of Cascabela thevetia are also well known, being due to the cardenolides thevetin A and B [54]. There are no reported cases of poisoning caused by these species in the area. These two genera are used for the same purposes in Pakistan [55]. Accompanying these two species, the ornamental presence of several species and cultivars of Rosa is evident in gardens and along sidewalks.

Medicinal

Medicinal use was the second most important of the species reported in Cuatrociénegas, with 98 species, of which 39 are herbaceous, 43 shrubs, and 15 trees. There were 62 native and 36 introduced species. Similar percentages of growth forms, herbaceous, and shrub medicinal species were found in Ethiopia [56]. The families with the greater number of genera and species were Lamiaceae (10 genera and 11 species), Asteraceae (9 and 9), Cactaceae (8 and 15), and Lauraceae (3 and 4). Nine categories of use following the World Health Organization (WHO [57];) and 57 ailments or diseases treated were reported (Table 3). The main categories were digestive, integumentary, endocrine, respiratory, and circulatory (Supplementary Material).

Species used to alleviate digestive ailments stand out from the rest of the other uses, and almost 60% of the species are used exclusively for this purpose. The boiled leaves of 24 of these plants are used to alleviate ailments in a similar way to those reported in central Mexico [58], Bolivia [59], Ethiopia and Morocco [60, 61], and India [62]. Several native and exotic plants used in Mexico to alleviate digestive disorders such as Tragia ramosa, Poliomintha glabrescens, Rosmarinus officinalis, Salvia officinalis, Peumus boldus, and Moringa oleifera are used to alleviate these disorders around the world, for example in Turkey [63], Algeria [64], Serbia [65], and Nepal [66]. Among these medicinal species, several exotic species in Lamiaceae which have aromatic glands are notable, such as Marrubium vulgare, Melissa officinalis, Mentha piperita, Mentha spicata, Ocimum basilicum, as well as Symphytum officinale, Citrus × limon, Citrus × sinensis, and few autochtonous species such as Artemisia ludoviciana, Poliomintha glabrescens, Persea americana, and Vachellia farnesiana. Most of the exotic species are commonly used for medicinal purposes in southern Mexico [33], Colombia [67], and Europe (Serbia [68], Spain [69], and Bosnia-Herzegovina [70]). Almost half of the species used to alleviate digestive ailments (23) are exotic. The ancestral traditions about the use of these aromatic medicinal species for the cure of certain symptoms has been perpetuated by the pilgrimage of species, whose uses are repeated in different cultures and continents, as stated by Leonti and Casu [71]. This reinforces the hypothesis of transference between cultures, and ethnobotanical globalization and its ethnopharmacological knowledge.

The majority of dermal conditions or those related to the integumentary system are cured with at least 23 different species. Most of these species are native, mainly several genera such as Cylindropuntia, Echinocactus, Echinocerus, Epithelantha, Ferocactus, and Opuntia. These genera have a common use among the inhabitants of the area since the pulp of all of these plant species is used as a poultice to heal external wounds. These genera are of New World origin, but their traditional use is also found in other cultures where these species are introduced, such as in India [72]. These and other cactus genera are used for the same purposes in other countries. Some of these genera and species include Opuntia and Melocactus [73], Opuntia [74], and Opuntia ficus-indica [75]. Other important native species commonly used for these purposes are Agave lechuguilla (ground raw root); Flourensia cernua (boiled leaves), Machaeranthera pinnatifida (boiled leaves), and Jatropha dioica (raw root). Agave lechuguilla has a long tradition of use for the control of skin diseases [40]. It is known that the stems of Jatropha dioica are boiled and the resulting infusion is applied in the form of a poultice or used in baths to relieve infection from blows or external or internal wounds after washing with soap [41], and in Cuatrociénegas people use this plant in the same way. Similarly, the traditional medicinal uses of exotic species are the same or similar to those applied in their place of origin. Among these species noted for their widespread and multipurpose use to cure wounds are Matricaria chamomilla, Aloe vera, and Punica granatum [76, 77]. The treatments essentially involve the application of poultices with the solution obtained from the boiled, crushed or fresh plant parts.

The third place in importance as ranked by the number of mentions for medicinal uses is the use of plants to alleviate ailments of the endocrine system. There were 19 species in this category, 12 native and 7 exotics. The most common uses are the stems of the five Opuntia species, in addition to Arctostaphylos pungens, Anemopsis californica, Solanum rostratum, Capsicum annum, Turnera diffusa, Lippia graveolens, Larrea tridentata, and Urtica chamedryoides. Branches (14 species) and leaves (11 species), both boiled, and inflorescences (6 species) are the main plant parts used. These uses and species also occur in Bolivia [78].

Respiratory diseases are mainly treated with 13 species, half of which are native. Regardless of the part of the plant used, all these treatments involve the use of the boiled plant part and are taken as an infusion. The leaves are among the main plant parts used (Rosmarinus, Eucaliptus, Citrus, Leucophyllum, and Poliomintha), as well as stems (Opuntia) and bracts (Bougainvillea). It is often found that essential oils of Citrus are used to control cough [79], and the leaf tea and lemon juice of several genera of Rutaceae are good for eliminating cough [80]. Eucalyptus leaf tea is used in several countries to control respiratory ailments [81], commonly used in Cuatrociénegas.

Circulatory ailments are essentially treated with seven plants, five natives (Ibervillea sonorae, Croton suaveolens, Portulaca oleracea, Leucophyllum frutescens, and Turnera diffusa) and two exotic species (Olea europea and Salvia officinalis). The leaves, stems, and roots are the plant parts most used for these effects. The leaves and stems of these last two exotic species are boiled and drunk as an infusion. The dried root of Ibervillea sonorae (brought from the state of Sonora by plant sellers), cut into pieces and then added to water for later consumption, or the leaves, stems, and flowers of Portulaca oleracea, Croton suaveolens, and Turnera diffusa are commonly boiled and the infusion is drunk. These latter species are widely used in other areas of northeastern Mexico to purify the blood and increase physical strength [40,41,42]. Croton species have active alkaloids [82], and some species even produce red latex, which is culturally associated with certain medicinal properties [83]. The pink tones that the boiled water acquires when the branches of some species are added are considered an indicator that these plants are medicinal and they are frequently taken daily at lunchtime. This is the case for Croton suaveolens; when pieces of branches are added to boiling water, it acquires a pink hue, and is used as hot or iced tea as a daily drink instead of soft drinks as a way to purify the blood. Popular knowledge recognizes aphrodisiac properties of Turnera diffusa [41, 84]. Some interviewees mentioned that they use it daily to obtain better physical performance at work in the fields. Both virtues of this plant have been detailed in studies where at least twenty different chemical compounds have been detected [84]; however, it is still unknown which compound is responsible for the aphrodisiac activity [85], although the aphrodisiac effect has been demonstrated in rats [86]. Moreover, cultural affiliation diseases are also present in the mestizo communities and have been reported in other communities in northeastern Mexico [36,37,38]. The local people consider “the fright” as a health problem, for which branches with Schinus molle are used, passing through the whole body to clean and thus heal the sick. However, this health-disease connotation is different from that reported in indigenous communities [39]. We assume that it may be related to greater access to public and private health systems, so it is recommended to deepen its study in future works.

Food

The food category was the third most important group of plant species, accounting for 54 species. The plant parts used were fleshy and dry fruits (32), leaves (10), and seeds (9). There were 24 native species and 30 exotic species. Over half (51%) of the species were herbaceous and the rest shrubs or trees. The most commonly used were three natives (Carya, Juglans, Persea) and seven exotic species (Ficus, Punica, Ziziphus, Cydonia, Eriobotrya, Prunus, and Citrus). All these species are used with a dual purpose; on the one hand as a shade of fruit while the fruits are edible, or cooked to make sweets or syrups. At least seven of these double function genera are used in the same way in Morocco [87], and six of them as edible fruits [88]. The fruits of cultivated plants grown in the gardens are mainly for self-consumption, and sometimes fruits of Ficus and Prunus are sold at local markets. The fruits of native plants that are used the most are from the genera Opuntia and Echinocereus, which are picked in season to be consumed directly after removing thorns and husks or stored for a few days under refrigeration and later sold as seasonal fruit. Their sweet-sour pulp is used to make flavored ice pops or milk pops. There is a high demand for their seasonal consumption because they are products of a single season. Edible fruits of various genera of cacti such as Opuntia, Hylocereus, and Stenocereus are notable in the State of Mexico for being used much more than other families of native plants [89]. Our informants reported having a greater preference for these genera due to their presence most of the year or because they can store them dehydrated. This is partly consistent with the fact that people choose products that provide security, selecting species (products) present throughout the year [90], in addition to being a response to the availability of ethnobotanical resources present in the Cuatrociénegas region.

Forage

There were 21 forage species recorded; two exotic species, Avena sativa and Sorghum bicolor, which were the most important cultivated species used to feed domestic livestock, and 19 native wild species. The fruits and stems of all members of Cactaceae, and inflorescences and fruits of Asparagaceae (Yucca, Dasylirion, and Agave) are the most important wild species for forage. Except for O. ficus-indica, all the Opuntia fleshy stems are seared before feeding them to cattle, and the inflorescences, flowers, and edible fruits of all Aspraragaceae are eaten raw. Opuntia ficus-indica is common in the area and grown in many gardens. This species was domesticated in Mexico [91], and grows in human-modified environments [92]. It is common to find it in abandoned farming areas close to human settlements. It is used as fodder by cutting the stems with a machete to feed the cattle.

Construction and fuel

Twelve of the most common native genera in the regional landscape, including Prosopis, Juniperus, Vachellia, Quercus, Cupressus, Fouquieria, Pinus, Fraxinus, and Larrea, are the most common plants used for fuel and construction. They are used to build pens for cattle, attic, roofs, and columns for rural houses. Several of these genera are used similarly in southern Mexico [93] and North Africa [94]. Although the use of these woods is frequent, the areas bordering the natural protected area are not threatened, as the main source of fuel in the area is natural gas, sold in cylinders; however, from the point of view of economic botany, mesquite wood stands out as being economically important as it is sold for firewood and for the manufacture of handicrafts. It provides part of the income of a good number of inhabitants. Wooden crafts are sold mainly to domestic and foreign tourists. The prices of these items range from 30 pesos (about $1.60 USD) to 500 pesos (about $25.00 USD), according to the quality of the woodworking. The wood of the other species, Vachellia, Quercus, Cupressus, and Pinus, is regularly stored dry for cooking at gatherings of family and friends and it is used to roast goat, lamb, or pork.

Condiments

The native and exotic cultivated species used as condiments are an important part of traditional foods in Cuatrociénegas. In total, 14 species with seasoning properties were registered, 10 of them exotic, and four natives. Two plant families, Apiaceae and Lamiaceae, contain almost 77% of these species. Of the exotic species, the most notable for their multiple uses are Mentha piperita, M. spicata, Coriandrum sativum, Petroselinum crispum, Ocimum basilicum, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Cuminum cyminum. All of them are used daily in the preparation of various traditional dishes. Several of these species as well as many other different genera and species of this family are also used as medicinal plants to heal digestive disorders [95], or even to alleviate types of ailments such as respiratory and endocrine diseases [96]. Two of the most common native species used as condiments in the study area are Capsicum annum (to prepare spicy food) and Lippia graveolens. Both are also commonly present in many regional dishes; the latter is frequently used to prepare a heavily spiced dish (called menudo) considered to relieve hangovers. Although it is mentioned in few interviews, a boiled solution of the Capsicum annuum fruit is used as an anti-inflammatory. Some components of Capsaicinoides and capsinoids have anti-inflammatory activity [97]. An infusion of Lippia graveolens is often used in Cautrocienegas to alleviate phlegm produced by bacterial infections of the throat or sore throat, and it has been shown that this plant possesses antibacterial activity [98].

Living fences

A distinctive feature in rural homes in northern Mexico is the presence of live fences as a means of delimiting private property, especially small areas. Given the presence of a large number of shrub species with lateral or terminal spines, thorny fleshy stems, or hardwood, they are useful species for keeping cattle, native fauna, and humans away. These morphological characteristics are widely used for this purpose, and their attractive appearance, colorful and aromatic flowers, leaf size, and shape give them an additional aesthetic appeal, which also fulfills the function of beautifying an area as well as protecting it. The most common species used for these purposes are of the genera Agave, Yucca, Fouquieria, Opuntia, Vachellia, and Prosopis. Agave is the most effective due to its vegetative reproduction, producing young individuals adjacent to each other that make it very difficult for intruders to cross these fences.

Fibers

The production of fiber, which was once highly lucrative, today is a craft, which still survives; however, there are few people who are engaged in this activity, due to the low prices of crafts made from natural fiber. People say that it is not worth working so hard. This activity is less and less frequent in northern Mexico, even in the poorest communities [99]. The loss of this activity is a reflection of the transculturization processes.

Use value of ethnobotanical species in Cuatrociénegas

Informant consensus factor (Fic), fidelity level (FL), and IVU (use value index)

Four species; three autochthonous, Lophophora williamsii, Aricoarapus fissuratus, Cylindrountia imbricata, and one exotic, Sansevieria thyrsiflora, obtained the highest FIC value (0.66). These species represent the osseous-muscular category; there is a high consensus in the use of these plants for the cure of this type of disease. Lophophora cut into pieces and dipped in alcohol has long been used as medicine in northeastern Mexico [41] and southern USA [100]. The other two categories of use with the highest FIC were the circulatory (0.5) and integumentary (0.5) categories (Table 4). Together, these two categories include 21 species (18 native). This points to the extensive empirical knowledge of the local people that results in continuous use of these species for the cure of certain related diseases; namely cacti to remedy integumentary ailments, and the species Croton suavelones, Ibervillea sonorae, Portulaca oleracea, and Olaea europaea to relieve circulatory ailments. Fourteen species with a high fidelity level were the most common species mentioned for healing a specific type of illness, mainly 11 native species, among them Chenopodium ambrosioides (antiparasitic, FL = 100%), Poliomintha glabrescens (cough, FL = 100%), Jatropha dioica (strengthening gums, FL = 85.7%), Lophophora williamisii (rheumatism, FL = 85.7%), and Persea americana (antiparasitic, FL = 83.3%). Salvia officinalis (anemia, FL = 75%) and Mentha spicata (stomach pain, FL = 60%) were the most mentioned exotic species (Table 5). The IVU values in this study range from 1.3 (Matricaria chamomilla) to 2.72 (Larrea tridentata). If it is considered that the IUV reflects the potential use of a particular plant to treat diseases, higher values of IVU indicate that the use of a particular species is more commonly used to alleviate particular illnesses. This is the case for the most important native species, such as Larrea tridentata, Flourensia cernua (IVU = 2.33), Capsicum annuum (IVU = 2.3), Opuntia ficus-indica (IVU = 2.25), Opuntia engelmannii (IVU = 2.23), Turnera diffusa (IVU = 2.13), Hedeoma costata (IVU = 1.9), and two exotic species, Rosmarinus officinale (IVU = 1.95) and Mentha spicata (IVU = 1.8), which, according to the information gathered, are considered the most reliable medicinal species in the cure of certain particular diseases (Table 6). Most interviewees who use Larrea tridentata as a medicine agree that it is useful for the removal of kidney stones and that the use of Flouresnia cernua is suitable for curing stomach pain. Most of the interviewees who know the medicinal use of Capsicum annuum apply it to eliminate cough. More than half of the interviewees mention that Turnera diffusa is an excellent remedy against body weakness. At least regionally in northeastern Mexico, these species are also used to alleviate the same or related illnesses [36, 40,41,42].

Table 4 Category of use, number of species mentioned (nt), number of uses recorded (nur), and FIC of medicinal plants used in Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico. The Roman numerals correspond to the WHO International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [57]
Table 5 Fidelity label (FL) values obtained for the main medicinal plant species mentioned by informants in Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico. Ip = number of informants who indicated the use of a plant for the same particular ilness; Iu = number of informants who mentioned the species for any illness within a category of use
Table 6 Medicinal plant species with the greatest number of different uses in Cuatrociénegas, Coahuila, Mexico and their respective IVU

Conclusion

The native diversity of wild flora in Cuatrociénegas Valley, combined with the varied introduced flora, is an important multifunctional resource. Despite the fact that the local population is mestizo, these people have developed a complex inventory of knowledge of this flora and ethnobotanical practices adapted at a socio-ecological level. On the one hand, these practices address extreme desert environmental conditions, and secondly address socio-cultural processes of semi-urbanization. The ethnobotanical diversity yields a source of food, medicine, ornaments, timber, and other materials that are used depending on the needs of the local people. It is interesting to note the importance and care given to ornamental species, since, in other studies carried out elsewhere in semi-arid areas of northeastern Mexico [36, 40,41,42], it has not been reported. This special use of introduced ornamentals is, on the one hand, related to medicinal uses, but it is also especially due to the hostile desert ecosystem where the arid vegetation is mostly shrubs and herbaceous plants. For this reason, the local population strives to maintain gardens that provide them with shading for their grounds and houses, which allows them to mitigate, in part, the strong solar radiation and counteract the dry landscape. Another peculiarity was that although people give great importance to introduced species, the cultural importance index put native species characteristic of the Chihuahuan Desert in first place. This allows us to visualize the importance of the social-ecological role of the people in insuring the permanence of wild species. The diversity of native and introduced species, their multifunctionality, mestizo culture, semi-urbanization processes, desert ecosystem, as well as the conservation status and the flora collection restrictions at the Biosphere Reserve level make up complex ethnobotanical biocultural diversity of Cuatrociénegas. This constitutes an example supporting the concept that biocultural diversity is not only importane in regions with high biological and cultural diversity [44]. In an orthodox way, it has been mentioned that indigenous communities establish greater socio-ecological relationships; however, studies with mestizo communities, and the statistical comparison between them, determine that biocultural diversity is a much more complex system. Our results affirm that despite the peculiarities of Cuatrociénegas, native species are known and used. In addition, we show that there are cultural niches that are occupied and enhanced by a varied exotic flora. Therefore, biocultural diversity at the local level is a deep socio-ecological relationship, determined by multiple variables [19]. These variables describe the way people live and interact with nature, either in indigenous areas, in traditional rural landscapes [20], and even in urban landscapes [21], in this case, in semi-urban desert landscapes.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable. Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analused durin the current study.

References

  1. 1.

    Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México. 1st ed. Mexico: Editorial Limusa; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Henrickson J, Daniel RF. Three new species of Carlowrightia (Acanthaceae) from the Chihuahuan Desert Region. Madroño. 1979;26(1):26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alcaraz LD, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Souza V, Herrera-Estrella L, Olmedo G. Understanding the evolutionary relationships and major traits of Bacillus through comparative genomics. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):332. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-332.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Breitbart M, Hoare A, Nitti A, Siefert J, Haynes M, Dinsdale E, Edwards R, Souza V, Rohwer F, Hollander D. Metagenomic and stable isotopic analyses of modern freshwater microbialites in Cuatro Cienegas, Mexico. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(1):16–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01725.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kornfield IL, Koehn RH. Genetic variation and speciation in New World Cichlids. Evol. 1975;29(3):427–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00832.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Desnues CM, Rodriguez-Brito B, Rayhawk S, Kelley S, Tran T, Haynes M, Liu H, Furlan M, Wegley L, Chau B, Ruan Y, Hall D, Angly FE, Edwards RA, Li L, Thurber RV, Reid RP, Siefert J, Souza V, Valentine DL, Swan BK, Breitbart M, Rohwer F. Diversity and evolution of viruses in modern stromatolites and thrombolites. Nature. 2008;452(7185):340–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06735.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Meyer ER. Late Quaternary paleoecology of the Cuatro Cienegas basin, Coahuila, Mexico. Ecol. 1973;54:982–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Minckley T, Jackson S. Ecological stability in a changing world? Reassessment of the paleo-environmental history of Cuatro Cienegas, Mexico. J Biogeogr. 2008;35(1):188–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01829.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Minckley WL, Cole GA. Preliminary limnological information on waters of the Cuatro Ciénegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico. Southwest Nat. 1968;13(4):421–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Winsborough BM, Theriot E, Czarnecki DB. Diatoms on a continental “island”: Lazarus species, marine disjuncts and other endemic diatoms of the Cuatro Cienegas basin, Coahuila, Mexico. Nova Hedwigia Suppl. 2009;135:257–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Piccini L, Forti P, Giulivo I, Mecchia M. The polygenetic caves of Cuatro Ciénegas (Coahuila, Mexico): Morphology and speleogenesis. Int J Speleol. 2007;36(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.36.2.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mc-Kee JW, Jones NW, Long LE. Stratigraphy and provenance of strata along the San Marcos fault, central Coahuila, Mexico. Geol Soc Am Bull. 1990;102(5):593–614. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<0593:SAPOSA>2.3.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pinkava DJ. Vegetation and flora of the bolson of Cuatro Ciénegas region, Coahuila, Mexico, I. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 1979;38:35–73.

  14. 14.

    Pinkava DJ. Vegetation and flora of the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Coahuila, Mexico. In: Transaction of the Symposium of the Biological Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert Region, U.S. and Mexico. U.S. Nat. Park Service Transcations and Proceedings Series 3 (1977); 1978. p. 327–34.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Johnson JE. Special symposium on the biota of Cuatro Ciénegas: a summary. See Marsh; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    CONABIO. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Cuatro Ciénegas: United States of Mexico (Government). http://www.conabio.gob.mx/conocimiento/regionalizacion/doctos/rhp_048.html

  17. 17.

    Mendoza BMA. Venustiano Carranza: el hombre tras la constitución de 1917. 1st ed. Panorama: Panorama Editorial; 2017.

  18. 18.

    Forti P, Giulivo I, Mecchia M, Piccini L. The physical environment: geography and climate of Cuatro Ciénegas. In: Badino G, Bernabei T, De-Vivo A, Giulivo I, Savino G, editors. Under the Desert: the mysterious waters of Cuatro Ciénegas. Treviso: Edizioni Tintoretto; 2004. p. 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gutiérrez-Santillán TV, Moreno-Fuentes A, Sánchez-González A, Sánchez-Rojas G. Knowledge ans use of biocultural diversity by nahua in the Huasteca region of Hidalgo, Mexico. EC. 2019. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-06-8.07-1-31.

  20. 20.

    Arnaiz-Schmitz C, Herrero-Jáuregui C, Schmitz MF. Losing a heritage hedgerow landscape. Biocultural diversity conservation in a changing social-ecological Mediterranean system. Sci Total Environ. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.413.

  21. 21.

    Elands BHM, Vierikko K, Anderson E, Fischer LK, Gonçalves P, Haase D, et al. Biocultural diversity: a novel concepts to assess human–nature interrelations, nature conservation and stewardship in cities. Urban For Urban Green. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.006.

  22. 22.

    INEGI. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de Coahuila de Zaragoza 2017. 1st ed: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; 2017.

  23. 23.

    Arriaga-Cabrera L, Espinosa-Rodríguez JM, Aguilar-Zúñiga C, Martínez-Romero E, Gómez-Mendoza L, Loa-Loza E. Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México. 1st ed: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; 2000.

  24. 24.

    Flores Rivas JD. El Desierto Chihuahuense y su importancia entre las zonas desérticas de México 2007;28:4-5. Ciencia@sanluispotosi.mx.

  25. 25.

    Reyes-Olivas A, García-Moya E, López-Mata L. Cacti-shrub interactions in the coastal desert of northern Sinaloa, Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2002.1018.

  26. 26.

    Pinkava D. Vegetation and flora of the Bolson of Cuatro Cienegas Region, Coahuila, Mexico: IV. Summary, Endemism and Corrected Catalogue. J Arizona-Nevada Acad Sci. 1984;19(1):23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Villarreal-Quintanilla JA. Listados florísticos de México: XXIII. Flora de Coahuila: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2001.

  28. 28.

    INE-SEMARNAP. Programa de manejo del área de protección de flora y fauna de Cuatrociénegas: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales; 1999.

  29. 29.

    Albuquerque UP, Cunha L, Lucena R, Alves RRN. Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    ISE International Society of Ethnobiology: ISE Code of Ethics. http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/ (2006). Accessed 10 Feb 2021.

  31. 31.

    Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

  32. 32.

    Gutiérrez-Santillán TV, Albuquerque UP, Valenzuela-Galván D, Reyes-Zepeda F, Vázquez L-B, Mora-Olivo A, et al. Trends on mexican ethnozoological research, vertebrates case: a systematic review. EC. 2019. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2019-01-8.01-1-39.

  33. 33.

    Heinrich M, Ankli A, Fre B, Weimann C, Sticher O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(11):1859–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00181-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Friedman J, Zohara Y, Amotz D, Palewitch D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert, Israel. J Ethnopharmacol. 1986;16(2-3):275–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(86)90094-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Silva VA, Albuquerque UP. Técnicas para análise de dados etnobotânicos. In: Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP, editors. Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobotanica. Recife: NUPEEA; 2004. p. 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Estrada E, Villarreal JA, Cantú C, Cabral I, Scott L, Yen C. Ethnobotany in the Cumbres de Monterrey National Park, Nuevo León, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-8.

  37. 37.

    Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Ortiz-Sánchez A, Mariano NA, Maldonado-Almanza B, Reyes-García V. Factors affecting ethnobotanical knoweledge in a mestizo community of the Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Medellín-Morales SG, Barrientos-Lozano L, Mora-Olivo A, Almaguer-Sierra P, Mora-Ravelo SG. Diversidad de conocimiento etnobotánico tradicional en la reserva de la Biósfera de "El Cielo", Tamaulipas, México. Ecología Aplicada. 2017;16(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v16i1.904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Farfán B, Casas A, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Pérez-Negrón E. Mazahua ethnobotany and subsistence in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, México. Econ Bot. 2007;61(2):173–91. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[173:MEASIT]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Estrada E, Soto B, Garza M, Villarreal JA, Jiménez J, Pando M, et al. Medicinal plants in the southern region of the state of Nuevo León, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Estrada-Castillón E, Garza-López M, Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Salinas-Rodríguez MM, Soto-Mata BE, González-Rodríguez H, González-Uribe D, Cantú-Silva I, Carrillo-Parra A, Cantú-Ayala C. Ethnobotany in Rayones, Nuevo León, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Estrada-Castillón E, Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Rodríguez-Salinas MM, Encinas-Domínguez JA, González-Rodríguez H, Romero-Figueroa G, et al. Ethnobotanical survey of useful species in Bustamante, Nuevo León, Mexico. Hum Ecol. 2018;46(1):117–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9962-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Latorre DL, Latorre FA. Plants used by the Mexican Kickapoo indians. Econ Bot. 1977;31(3):340–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4253858.

  44. 44.

    Landeros-Cuevas J, Martín-Ramírez A, Alba-Ávila JA, Aguilar-Contreras A. Plantas medicinales de los mercados municipales en la Comarca Lagunera de Durango y Coahuila, México. Árido-Ciencia. 2018;3(1):3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Minckley T, Jackson S. Ecological stability in a changing world? Reassessment of the paleo-environmental history of Cuatrocienegas, México. J Biogeogr. 2008;35:188–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lira R, Casas A, Rosas-López R, Paredes-Flores M, Pérez-Negrón E, Rangel-Landa S, et al. Traditional knowledge and useful plant richness in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, México. Econ Bot. 2009;60(4):374–85.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Harmon D, Loh J. The index of linguistic diversity: A new quantitative measure of trends in the status of the world’s languages. LD&C. 2010;4:97–151.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Brosi, B.J., et al., 2007. Cultural erosion and biodiversity: Canoe-making knowledge in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Conserv Biol. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00654.x

  49. 49.

    Pamungkas RN, Indriyani S, Hakim L. The ethnobotany of homegardens along rural corridors as a basis for ecotourism planning: A case study of Rajegwesi village, Banyuwangi, Indonesia. JBES. 2013;3(9):6–69.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Maroyi A. Use and management of homegarden plants in Zvishavane district, Zimbabwe. Trop Ecol. 2013;54:191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Boege E. El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México: Hacia la conservación in situ de la biodiversidad y agrodiversidad en los territorios indígenas. 1st ed: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia; 2008.

  52. 52.

    Srithi K, Trisonthi C, Wangpakapattanawong P, Srisanga P, Balslev H. Plant diversity in Hmong and Mien homegardens in northern Thailand. Econ Bot. 2012;66(2):192–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-012-9199-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Khan I, Kant C, Sanwaria A, Meena L. Acute cardiac toxicity of Nerium oleander/indicum Poisoning (Kaner) Poisoning. Heart Views. 2010;2010(3):115–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.76803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Langford SD, Boor PJ. Oleander toxicity: an examination of human and animal toxic exposures. Toxicology. 1996;109(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-483x(95)03296-r.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ibrar M, Farruk H, Amir S. Ethnobotanical studies on plant resources of Ranyal Hills, District Shangla, Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 2007;39(2):329–37.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tolossa JT, Megeresa M. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used to treat human diseases in Berbere District, Bale Zone of Oromia Regional State, South East Ethiopia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018;2018:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8602945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    World Health Organization. “ICD-10 Version:2010.” International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 2012. apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010.

  58. 58.

    Andrade-Cetto A. Ethnobotanical study of the medicinal plants from Tlanchinol, Hidalgo, México. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;122(1):163–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Macía MJ, García E, Vidaurre PJ. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants commercialized in the markets of La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(2):337–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wondimu T, Asfaw Z, Kelbessa E. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants around ‘Dheeraa’ town, Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;112(1):152–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.02.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zougagh S, Belghiti A, Rochd T, Zerdani I, Mouslim J. Medicinal and aromatic plants used in traditional treatment of the oral pathology: The ethnobotanical survey in the economic capital Casablanca, Morocco (North Africa). Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2019;9(1):35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-018-0194-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Parthiban R, Vijayakumar S, Prabhu S, Yabesh JGEM. Quantitative traditional knowledge of medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases from Kudavasal taluk of Thiruvarur district, Tamil Nadu, India. Rev Bras. 2016;26(1):109–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.07.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dogan Y, Ugulu I. Medicinal plants used for gastrointestinal disorders in some districts of Izmir Province, Turkey. Ethno Med. 2013;7(3):149–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2013.11886456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Benarba B. Medicinal plants used by traditional healers from South-West Algeria: An ethnobotanical study. J Intercult Ethnopharmacol. 2016;5(4):320–30. https://doi.org/10.5455/jice.20160814115725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Savikin K, Zdunić G, Menković N, Zivković J, Cujić N, Tereščenko M. Ethnobotanical study on traditional use of medicinal plants in South-Western Serbia, Zlatibor district. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;146(3):803–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Rokaya MB, Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Timsina B, Münzbergová Z, Asselin H, Tiwari A, Shrestha SS, Sigdel SR. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in gastrointestinal disorders in Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;158:221–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.10.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bussman RW, Paniagua-Zambrana NY, Romero C, Hart RE. Astonishing diversity—the medicinal plant markets of Bogotá, Colombia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018;14(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0241-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Jarić S, Mačukanović-Jocić M, Djurdjević L, Mitrović M, Kostić O, Karadžić B. An ethnobotanical survey of traditionally used plants on Suva planina mountain (south-eastern Serbia). J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;175:93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Alarcόn R, Pardo-de-Santayana M, Priestley C, Morales R, Heinrich M. Medicinal and local food plants in the south of Alava (Basque Country, Spain). J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;176:207–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sarić-Kundalić B, Dobes C, Klatte-Asselmeyer V, Sauk J. Ethnobotanical study on medicinal use of wild and cultivated plants in middle, south and west Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.061.

  71. 71.

    Leonti M, Casu L. Traditional medicines and globalization: Current and future perspectives in ethnopharmacology. Front Pharmacol. 2013;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00092.

  72. 72.

    Das PK, Badore NS, Patel P, Deshmukh N. Ethnomedicinal wound healing plant in Khargone district of Madhya Pradesh: a survey over Nimari communities. Pharm Biol Eval. 2016;3(4):388–99.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Ribeiro RV, Bieski IGC, Balogun SO, Martins DTO. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by Ribeirinhos in the North Araguaia microregion, Mato Grosso, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;205:69–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.04.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Santos-Díaz MS, de la Rosa APB, Héliès-Toussaint C, Guéraud F, Nègre-Salvayre A. Opuntia spp.: Characterization and Benefits in Chronic Diseases. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8634249.

  75. 75.

    Quiroga R, Meneses L, Bussmann RW. Medicinal ethnobotany in Huacareta (Chuquisaca, Bolivia). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Chithra P, Sajithla GB, Chandrakasan G. Influence of Aloe vera on the healing of dermal wounds in diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;59(3):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(97)00124-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Nayak SB, Rodrigues V, Maharaj S, Bhogadi VS. Wound healing activity of the fruit skin of Punica granatum. J Med Food. 2013;16(9):857–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2012.0229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Paniagua-Zambrana NY, Bussmann RW, Hart RE, Moya-Huanca AL, Ortiz-Soria G, Ortiz-Vaca M, et al. Traditional knowledge hiding in plain sight—twenty-first century ethnobotany of the Chácobo in Beni, Bolivia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0179-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Papp N, Barthaa S, Boris G, Balogh L. Traditional uses of medicinal plants for respiratory diseases in Transylvania. Nat Prod Commun. 2001;8(10):1459–60.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    York T, de Wet H, van Vuurenb SF. Plants used for treating respiratory infections in rural Maputaland, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.03.072.

  81. 81.

    Bussmann RW, Glenn A. Medicinal plants used in Peru for the treatment of respiratory disorders. Rev Peru Biol. 2010;17(2):331–46.

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Milanowski DJ, Winter REK, Elvin-Lewis MPF, Lewis WH. Geographic distribution of three alkaloid chemotypes of Croton lechleri. J Nat Prod. 2002;65(6):814–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/np000270v.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Sandoval M, Okuhama NN, Clark M, Angeles FM, Lao J, Bustamante S, Miller MJS. Sangre de grado Croton palanostigma induces apoptosis in human gastrointestinal cancer cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;80(2-3):121–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00013-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Domínguez XA, Hinojosa M. Isolation of 5-Hydroxy-7,3'4 - Trimethoxy -flavone from Turnera diffusa. Planta Médica. 1976;43:175–8.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Spencer KC, Seigler DS. Tetraphyllin B from Turnera diffusa. Planta Médica. 1981;43(10):175–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971495.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Arletti R, Benelli A, Cavazzuti E, Scarpetta G, Bertolini A. Stimulating property of Turnera diffusa and Pfaffia paniculata extracts on the sexual-behavior of male rats. Psychopharmacology. 1999;143(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050913.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Khabbach A, Libiad M, Ennabili A, Bousta D. Medicinal and cosmetic use of plants from the province of Taza, Northern Morocco. BLACPMA. 2012;11(1):46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Mosina GKE, Maroyi A. Edible plants of urban domestic gardens in the Capricorn District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Trop Ecol. 2016;57(2):181–91.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Martínez-de-la-Cruz I, Rubí-Arriaga M, González-Huerta A, Pérez-López DJ, Franco-Mora O, Castañeda-Vildózola A. Frutos y semillas comestibles en el Estado de México. Rev Mex Ciencias Agrícolas. 2015;6(2):331–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Albuquerque UP. Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants: a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006;2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-2-30.

  91. 91.

    Griffith P. The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot. 2004;91(11):1915–21. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.11.1915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Hernández HM. Systematic notes and a detailed description of Opuntia ficus-indica (L) Mill. (Cactaceae). Agrociencia. 2005;39(4):395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-García V, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Rarámuri Community: A gender perspective for conservation. Hum Ecol. 2008;36(2):259–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9152-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    El-Darier SM, El-Mogaspi FM. Ethnobotany and relative importance of some endemic plant species at El-Jabal El-Akhdar Region (Libya). World J Agricultural Sci. 2009;5(3):353–60.

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kansole MMR, Hilou A, Millogo J, Nacoulma O. Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacognosy of Lamiaceae species from Central Burkina Faso: Leucas martinicensis (Jacquin) R. Brown, Hoslundia opposita Vahl and Orthosiphon pallidus Royle Ex Benth. Am J Ethnomedicine. 2015;2(4):219–32.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Khoury M, Stien D, Eparvier V, Ouaini N, El Beyrouthy M. Report on the medicinal use of eleven Lamiaceae species in Lebanon and rationalization of their antimicrobial potential by examination of the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of their essential oils. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2547169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Luo XJ, Peng J, Li YJ. Recent advances in the study on capsaicinoids and capsinoids. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;650(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.074.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Hernández T, Canales M, Ávila JG, Duran A, Caballero J, Romo-de-Vivar A, et al. Ethnobotany and antibacterial activity of some plants used in traditional medicine of Zapotitlán de las Salinas, Puebla (México). J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88(2-3):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00213-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Estrada E, Soto B, Garza M, Villarreal JA, Jiménez J, Pando M. Plantas útiles en el centro-sur del estado de Nuevo León. 1st ed: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; 2012.

  100. 100.

    Schultes RE. The aboriginal therapeutic uses of Lophophora Williamsii. Cact Succ J. 1940;12:177–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciate all the people of Cuatrociénegas participating in the interviews who kindly shared their knowledge with us. We thank the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) for the postdoctoral scholarship assigned to the student Tania Vianey Gutiérrez Santillán (2019-000006-01NACV-00240).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tania Vianney Gutiérrez-Santillán.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In each interview, the informant’s consent was obtained, including the consent to take photographs and participant observation activities (International Society of Ethnobiology 2006; http://ethnobiology.net/codeofethics/).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Material.

 Plant families, genera, species and their uses in Cuatrocienegas, Coahuila, Mexico. The letter after author name indicates: N = Native, E = Exotic. The collection number belongs to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Estrada-Castillón, E., Villarreal-Quintanilla, J.Á., Encina-Domínguez, J.A. et al. Ethnobotanical biocultural diversity by rural communities in the Cuatrociénegas Valley, Coahuila; Mexico. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 17, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-021-00445-0

Download citation

\