Skip to main content

Folk nomenclature and traditional knowledge of breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg] diversity in four Anglophone Caribbean countries



Since its introduction to the Anglophone Caribbean in 1793, breadfruit has had a diverse history in the region, and there is a considerable repository of traditional knowledge about the crop, that is undocumented. Consequently, it remains underutilized as a food source, despite recognition of its potential to contribute to food and nutrition security. Understanding the folk taxonomy and traditional knowledge associated with its diversity and uses is a prerequisite to develop programs for its commercial production and utilization.


This study was conducted among 170 respondents who were selected across four Anglophone Caribbean countries and provided information on the ethnobotany and traditional knowledge associated with breadfruit biodiversity, including systems of naming, identification and classification of breadfruit cultivars or types.


Breadfruit has socio-cultural and economic value and is produced for both home use and sale by most respondents (68%). The genetic diversity of breadfruit managed by the respondents is also important, as a total of 51 vernacular names were identified, with nine of those names recorded for the first time in this study. Breadfruit types were identified by morphological and agronomical characteristics, with other important traits relating to use and cooking quality. Classification of breadfruit cultivars or types was based on eating-quality, most suitable methods of preparation and ease of cooking.


The ethnobotanical and traditional knowledge obtained from this study may be useful in assessing the genetic diversity of breadfruit and guiding future community-based conservation and classification studies of this important crop resource in the Caribbean. This is crucial to support the commercialization of breadfruit to improve its contribution to food and nutrition security.


Breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis Parkinson (Fosberg) was domesticated in Oceania but is now widely distributed throughout the tropics [1]. In 1793, the British sea captain William Bligh successfully transported 682 breadfruit plants along with other plants of economic importance from Tahiti and Timor to the British Caribbean islands [2]. French voyagers also collected one seedless breadfruit in Tonga, which was distributed to the French Caribbean islands in the 1790s [3]. The introduction of breadfruit was envisaged to help reduce food shortages that severely affected the region, and breadfruit was considered the ideal crop based on earlier reports by other European explorers in the Pacific, who saw it as an easy crop to produce and a reliable source of food in the Pacific islands [4, 5]. The breadfruit plants introduced by Bligh were delivered directly to the islands of St. Vincent and Jamaica from which planting materials were subsequently distributed to other territories of the British Caribbean [6]. However, planting was mainly done on marginal lands to avoid competition with sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), which was the main economic crop produced throughout the region during the 18th century [5].

Breadfruit was not immediately favored for human consumption by the local population and periodically became a major source of food only after Emancipation in 1834 [6]. Consequently, the crop has played important roles in food and nutrition security and livelihood for many householders, especially those in rural communities [68]. However, its commercial potential has not been fully explored, and it is not generally regarded as a crop of significant economic importance [9]. It is worth noting that it is not included in the agricultural statistics for several Anglophone Caribbean countries where it is largely underutilized despite the high food import bill in these countries [9].

Although several breadfruit varieties introduced to the Anglophone Caribbean in the 1990s have been clearly identified and characterized, the diversity of the original germplasm distributed throughout this sub-region remains unknown [9]. The current geographical distribution of some breadfruit varieties can still be traced to areas of the Pacific, where they were originally collected by European explorers including Captain Bligh. However, Bligh did not identify the varieties he introduced to the Caribbean in 1793, but reported that he had five seedless types from Tahiti and two from Timor (one seedless and one seeded type) [2]. On an earlier ill-fated attempt in 1789 to introduce the breadfruit to the Caribbean, Bligh recorded the names of eight cultivars that he had collected: ‘Appeere’, ‘Awanna’, ‘Eroroo’, ‘Mire’, ‘Oree’, ‘Patteah’ ‘Powerro,’ and ‘Rowdeeah’ [10]. Both sets of plants were collected from the same source, and it is likely that materials introduced in 1793 were from among the same eight cultivars recorded in Bligh’s first voyage [2, 4].

In the St. Vincent Botanical Garden, where some of the plants introduced by Bligh were planted, the garden curator described six seedless breadfruit varieties, which were distinct in seasonality, fruit size and shape [11]. Leakey [3] reported five seedless varieties of breadfruit found in St. Vincent followed later by Andrews and Mason Jr. [12], who described seven breadfruit types, while Roberts-Nkrumah [13] reported 25 cultivar names in a survey of the island. Breadfruit was distributed from the botanical gardens in St Vincent to most of the other British territories during the 18th and 19th century. Tobago was an early recipient, with the planter, John Robley being awarded a gold medal in 1802 by The Royal Society of Arts for successfully establishing trees there [4].

In Jamaica, where almost half of the original plants brought to the region were delivered Weir, Tai [14] recorded four cultivars, Webster [15] also described four cultivars but with some differences in cultivar names, and Roberts-Nkrumah [16] reported eight cultivar names. Andrews and Mason Jr. [12] also reported four named cultivar names in Grenada and three each in St Lucia and Dominica.

Preservation and transmission of traditional knowledge of breadfruit biodiversity, production, utilization and conservation are essential for the promotion of breadfruit for food and nutrition security in the Anglophone Caribbean [8]. Limited documentation of this traditional or localized knowledge, which often relies on oral transmission from one generation to the next, may likely contribute to the underutilization of the crop in the region. In the Pacific, traditional knowledge was deemed the most valuable tool for cultivar identification of breadfruit, and the disappearance of many cultivars was related to the inter-generational loss of this knowledge [17]. Furthermore, by understanding traditional knowledge associated with breadfruit, researchers in the Republic of Marshall Island (RMI) discovered that two local cultivars were neglected and were threatened by extinction because they bore smaller-sized fruits and were not as prolific as other cultivars [18]. As food supply and consumption become more globalized, knowledge accumulated over millennia for underutilized crops such as breadfruit could disappear in a few generations, even in very remote areas, if it is not documented [19, 20]. Details of the traditional uses of breadfruit are available for the Pacific region [21]. Navarro, Malres [22] indicated that due to less oral transmission than in the past, significant loss of traditional knowledge of breadfruit uses, was associated with significant loss of genetic diversity. Detailed descriptions of breadfruit uses and information on its cultural significance and relevant varieties have not been found for the Anglophone Caribbean. Roberts-Nkrumah and Legall [8] described some of the uses of breadfruit in Trinidad and Tobago, and consumer preferences between two breadfruit cultivars based on sensory characteristics and preparation methods have also been described [23]. Documentation of traditional knowledge of breadfruit is important to increased utilization, and consequently, production and conservation of the existing biodiversity of this crop in the Anglophone Caribbean. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to present information on folk nomenclature and traditional knowledge associated with breadfruit diversity and to investigate systems of naming, identifying, and classifying breadfruit cultivars or types in the Anglophone Caribbean.


Area of study

The Anglophone Caribbean consists mostly of islands in the Greater and Lesser Antilles in a chain located southeast of North America and includes mainland countries in eastern Central America and north-western South America, all wholly or partially washed by the Caribbean Sea. A survey was conducted in four countries of the Anglophone Caribbean namely, Jamaica in the Greater Antilles and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, St. Kitts and Nevis, and Trinidad and Tobago in the Lesser Antilles (Fig. 1). In St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the survey was conducted only on the main island of St. Vincent., while data from the two islands of St. Kitts and Nevis were combined because of the small sample size from both islands, and Trinidad and Tobago were treated as two separate islands. These countries were selected based on accessibility to key informants, historical associations with breadfruit importation to the Caribbean and documentation of breadfruit production activities. They also represent different sub-regions within the wider Caribbean.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the Caribbean highlighting countries surveyed

Data collection

Between 2012 and 2015, ethnobotanical information was collected among 170 respondents in the four countries (Fig. 1). For each country, an initial list of potential respondents with their locations and telephone numbers was prepared consisting of breadfruit tree owners who were either farmers or homeowners or both, and other persons knowledgeable about breadfruit who were already known to at least one of the researchers from previous surveys [7, 8, 13] as in St. Vincent, Jamaica, and Trinidad. A farm, in the context of these countries, is an area of land cultivated by an individual or a family. Persons knowledgeable about breadfruit were mainly extension officers of the Ministry or Department of Agriculture who lived or worked in the parishes or counties of the country, or elderly consumers. These lists were updated by contacting the potential respondents directly by telephone to confirm their availability and willingness to participate in an interview and to request their assistance in identifying other potential respondents. Therefore, those who identified other potential respondents were also informants. Other informants were extension officers who had not been involved in previous surveys but knew breadfruit tree owners who were not already on the list. The surveys began with persons who had agreed to participate in the interviews at a mutually convenient date and time. The list continued to be updated using the snowball sampling technique as other informants were encountered, for example, shopkeepers or residents in a district who did not know about breadfruit varieties themselves but suggested the names of persons knowledgeable about breadfruit or those who owned trees. Where possible, the extension officer or other informant who was known to the respondent, introduced the researcher to the respondent. The survey also incorporated the experiences of all researchers who grew up in the region and were able to use their experience to identify tree owners and persons knowledgeable about breadfruit. Before all interviews, the potential respondents were advised about the affiliation of the researchers, the nature of the information that was being requested, the purpose for which it was being collected and assurance that their names and contact information would not be shared or published. Their willingness to participate was confirmed again. No inducement or payment was made for respondent participation.

Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire, administered by the researchers, and consisted of the following open-ended questions:

  1. 1.

    What are the names of breadfruit cultivars or types that you know?

  2. 2.

    How do you identify and describe the breadfruit cultivars or types that you know?

  3. 3.

    How do you use the breadfruit cultivars or types that you know?

  4. 4.

    Do you know of other uses for breadfruit?

The responses were recorded as summarized written notes. Where trees were accessible, photographs were taken, and leaf, flower and fruit samples were collected and placed in labelled bags for measurement within five hours. Interviews in a district, county or parish were discontinued when no other respondents were available or could add no new information.

Data analysis

Descriptive and inferential statistical data analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Version 21 [24]. Descriptive statistical methods included frequencies, percentages, and means. Inferential statistical methods included Chi-square test of association. The information on varietal names and uses were summarized in tables for each country or island.


Demographics of respondents

Table 1 provides a summary of the number and demographics of respondents in the survey. One hundred and seventy respondents were interviewed throughout the study. Respondents from Jamaica and Trinidad comprised half of the respondents (26% and 24%, respectively). Most were male (58%). Most respondents were from rural areas (54%) compared with those from semi-urban (31%) and urban areas (15%).

Table 1 Demographics of respondents in the survey

Breadfruit production systems

Based on respondents’ responses in this survey, breadfruit was produced in four types of production systems. These were border plantings, home gardens, mixed cropping and pure stands or monoculture orchard. Border plantings, characterized as single or scattered trees planted along the boundaries of farms and home gardens (35%), and trees in home gardens (34%) represented the two most common breadfruit production systems. This was followed by mixed cropping with other perennial or annual crops (29%) (Table 2). Pure stand breadfruit orchards, though rare (2%), were observed in two locations in Jamaica and one location in Trinidad. There was no significant association (χ2 = 15.862, df = 12, p = 0.198) in the distribution of production systems among countries/islands.

Table 2 Breadfruit production systems based on respondents in the Anglophone Caribbean

Breadfruit cultivation for food, sharing with relatives, friends, and neighbors or for household sales was important in the region. Respondents cultivated breadfruit in their home gardens or farms for home use or sharing with relatives, friends, and neighbors only (20%), for sale only (12.4%) or both home use or sharing with relatives, friends, and neighbors and sale (67.6%) (Fig. 2). Home use and individual sales were the most frequent reasons for cultivation and did not differ significantly among the islands (χ2 = 6.26, df = 8, p = 0.618).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Respondents’ reasons for cultivating breadfruit in the Anglophone Caribbean

Breadfruit diversity and descriptive vernacular names used in the Anglophone Caribbean

In the present study, 38 vernacular names of breadfruit were reported by respondents among the countries surveyed. The largest number of cultivar names were recorded in St. Vincent (23), followed by Jamaica (15), Tobago (4), Trinidad (2) and St. Kitts and Nevis (2). Four of these cultivar names were shared among islands, while several names were used on only one island (Table 3). Twenty-one of the 23 cultivar names identified in St. Vincent were recorded only on that island. Similarly, 13 of the 15 vernacular names recorded for Jamaica were not shared with any other island in the survey. One unique vernacular name, ‘Chouf chouf’, was recorded for Tobago. All cultivar names used in Trinidad and St. Kitts were either shared with other islands or between those two islands.

Table 3 Breadfruit vernacular names and descriptions in the Caribbean as reported in the literature, and observed in in situ collections and recorded in the present study

When vernacular names recorded in this survey were combined with those reported in earlier studies, a total of 51 different names were known throughout the Caribbean (Table 3). Nine unique vernacular names were recorded for the first time in this survey. These included ‘Brambram,’ ‘Couscous,’ ‘Finey’ and ‘Monkey breadfruit’ from Jamaica, ‘Mary Grace,’ Hard Nature,’ ‘Red Bread,’ and ‘Smooth Skin’ from St. Vincent and ‘Chouf chouf’ from Tobago (Table 3).

Folk nomenclature and identification of breadfruit types in the Anglophone Caribbean

Respondents who were knowledgeable of breadfruit diversity used different approaches to identify, name, and then classify breadfruit types or cultivars. For identification, respondents in this survey used 16 descriptors related to plant morphological characteristics (skin texture, fruit size, fruit shape, skin color, pulp color, leaf shape) and agronomic characteristics (time of bearing, time to maturity) (Table 4). Respondents perceived a range of breadfruit types, each having distinct features, and they used a combination of descriptors to identify breadfruit types or cultivars. The most frequently mentioned descriptor used for the identification of breadfruit was pulp color (77%), followed by skin texture (58%), fruit size (30%) and leaf shape (25%) (Table 4).

Table 4 Descriptors used by respondents for the identification of breadfruit  cultivars in the Caribbean

The pulp color states identified were white, cream, light yellow and yellow. The yellow pulp color of the cultivar ‘Yellow’/’Yellow Heart’ is often used as a benchmark for comparison with other cultivars. For example, a respondent referring to the pulp color of ‘Timor’ in Jamaica suggested that the pulp was not as yellow as ‘Yellow Heart.’ This was interpreted to mean that ‘Timor’ had a light-yellow pulp. Skin texture is also an important feature in cultivar identification and naming. Cultivars such as ‘Macca’ in Jamaica, ‘Kashee Bread in ‘St. Vincent’ and ‘Chouf chouf’ in Tobago were all identified first by their very rough skin. The names given to these cultivars are also based on their rough to spiky skin.

Leaf shape was also used to describe cultivars, and in some cases, it was the first descriptor used for those with distinct leaves (Fig. 3). For example, cultivars ‘Cassava’ in Jamaica and ‘Captain Bligh’ in St. Vincent were readily identified by their leaves, which had very deep sinuses (Fig. 3). In Jamaica, the names ‘Timor’ and ‘St. Kitts’ refer to the same cultivar, but both names were never used in the same location. However, when asked to give key identifying characteristics, respondents who used those names always gave the description for a cultivar with an unusual entire or dentate margin on the upper one-third of the leaf.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Leaf morphological variations observed among breadfruit cultivars in the Anglophone Caribbean: (A) Timor/ St. Kitts; (B) Kashee Bread; (C) Cassava, and (D) Yellow.

Traditional knowledge of breadfruit names and their classification in the Anglophone Caribbean

Many of the vernacular names encountered in this survey were often descriptive and reflected variation in fruit morphology, cooking and eating-quality and association with people, places, and things (Table 5). Some of these names were passed down from generation to generation and used by respondents without an understanding of their meaning. However, there were other names for which respondents perceived meaning. Vernacular names such as ‘Timor,’ ‘St. Kitts’ and ‘England’ were all based on the names of places (Table 5). Some vernacular names were based on people associated with the specific cultivar or type. For example, the vernacular name ‘Captain Bligh’ was based on the name of the sea captain who introduced breadfruit to the Anglophone Caribbean. Vernacular names such as ‘Yellow Heart,’ ‘Yellow,’ ‘Creole,’ and ‘Common’ appear to describe the same cultivar. ‘Yellow Heart’ was recorded in Jamaica, ‘Yellow’ was recorded in Trinidad, Tobago, and St. Kitts, while ‘Creole’ and ‘Common’ were both recorded for St. Vincent. Similarly, the vernacular names ‘Cassava’ and ‘Captain Bligh’, appeared to describe the same cultivar based on morphological features. Even within the same island or country, different vernacular names were used to describe cultivars that appeared to be identical. In Jamaica, the vernacular names ‘Timor’ and St. ‘Kitts’ were used for the same cultivar, which is usually distinguished from other cultivars as having an unusual leaf shape.

Table 5 Breadfruit vernacular names and implications for their meaning in the Anglophone Caribbean

Based on respondents in this survey, three criteria were used to classify breadfruit cultivars in the surveyed countries. These were eating-quality, the most suitable method of preparation and ease of cooking (Table 6). Moreover, three types of breadfruit were distinguished based on eating-quality, namely, ‘excellent’, ‘good’ and ‘poor’ (Table 6). Cultivars or types with excellent eating-quality usually had pulp that are yellow, soft, smooth texture when cooked and are often described as having a great mouth-feel. Cultivars with good eating-quality generally have cream to light yellow pulp and are described as having good mouth-feel and flavor. Poor eating-quality among breadfruit means firm pulp that is dry and has poor flavor. These cultivars generally have white to cream-colored pulp. Words such as ‘stringy,’ ‘barky’ and ‘strany’ were often used to describe the mouth-feel of those cultivars considered to have poor eating quality.

Table 6 Respondents’ classification of breadfruit cultivars in the Anglophone Caribbean

In St. Vincent and Jamaica, breadfruit cultivars were distinguished on the basis of the most suitable method of preparation, roasting or boiling. This did not mean that cultivars could not be prepared using both methods and/or other methods of preparation. However, both roasting and boiling were popular in those countries, with roasting being more favored. Cultivars that were more suitable for roasting tended to roast easily and had great flavor and eating-quality. Cultivars that generally did not roast easily or did not have great flavor when roasted were better for boiling. After classifying cultivars based on the most suitable method of preparation, respondents further classified cultivars based on ease of cooking—easy or hard. Cultivars that were easy to roast or boil took less time than those that were hard to cook. This method of classification also contributed to cultivar names such as ‘Easy Roast,’ ‘Hard Nature’ and ‘Hard to Roast.’


The results of this study indicated that breadfruit was widely cultivated in home gardens and farms alongside other crops. The planting of breadfruit in home gardens showed that breadfruit was a valuable food crop for individual households, especially in rural communities that accounted for most respondents. However, other factors, such as the availability of adequate space for trees to grow, also likely influenced the prevalence and number of breadfruit trees in home gardens [7]. The practice of planting breadfruit trees in home gardens can be linked to the planting of breadfruit on provision grounds, which were designated areas on estates where the enslaved populations were allowed to grow their own food during the period of slavery [25, 26]. Although enslaved Africans did not initially favor breadfruit, it was still widely considered important for animal feed especially during periods of food crises such as after hurricanes and other natural disasters [6].

Provision grounds that consisted of mixed agriculture systems with a diversity of crops are the precursors of subsistence agriculture found throughout the Caribbean today [25]. Breadfruit was either planted on these provision grounds or on marginal lands but never in the main production area because it was not viewed as an economic crop. However, breadfruit has been important for household food and nutrition security, which is supported in the present study where breadfruit is cultivated for food, sharing with relatives, friends, and neighbors. The sharing of agricultural produce with relatives, friends and neighbors are part of the Anglophone Caribbean culture and is an inbuilt social security system. The countries in this survey share a similar economic and agricultural history including that of breadfruit which is supported by the fact that similar productions systems are used. As a border crop, breadfruit is used as a windbreak and shade for other more economically important crops. For example, in Trinidad and Tobago, breadfruit was often planted as a shade crop for cocoa (Theobroma cacao), which was grown mainly to be exported [8]. The production of breadfruit as a main crop is still not widespread throughout the region. However, this does not diminish its value and importance for food and nutrition security, which was underscored by most respondents who considered breadfruit important for either home consumption, for sale or both. These results are consistent with reports of increasing consumer appreciation and demand for breadfruit, which could eventually result in greater demand and production [7, 8, 23]. Breadfruit has been recognized by the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, which has listed it as one of the 35 priority crops to be conserved for food and nutrition security [27]. By documenting breadfruit cultivars, preparation methods and cultivar suitability for different uses, the folk nomenclature and traditional knowledge reported in this study can help to conserve breadfruit diversity in the Anglophone Caribbean. Preserving and transmitting traditional knowledge of the value and use of breadfruit for food and nutrition to the present and future generations and can encourage demand for consumption and increase its production and utilization in the region.

This study confirmed the depth of traditional knowledge of breadfruit biodiversity and traditional methods used to distinguish breadfruit types in the Anglophone Caribbean, which are important for conservation. Respondents used diverse traits related to agro-morphology, cooking methods, eating-quality, postharvest handling, and agronomic traits to identify, classify and describe breadfruit types. Although many vernacular names were recorded in different locations, the descriptions given suggest that the same or similar types were sometimes called by different names in different locations. Therefore, the range of breadfruit accessions and understanding the traditional system of classification are important because farmers and home gardeners over time develop skills to manage and select cultivars that they recognize. This could determine the range of diverse types they manage and conserve, which could eventually influence the evolution and adaptability of the crop [28].

The current study also showed that many factors could influence cultivar names. Some cultivars were named after people, places, other crop plants, ease of cooking, frequency of occurrence, food items and words used in a local dialect. Vernacular names such as ‘St. Kitts’ ‘Timor,’ and ‘England’ were all named after places. It was not clear when or the reasons the name ‘St. Kitts’ became a cultivar name, but it is likely based on informal distribution of planting materials among islands in the Anglophone Caribbean. The cultivar name ‘England’ showed a direct link to the role of the colonial government in the collection and introduction of breadfruit to the Anglophone Caribbean. Some misconceptions were found, which may be due to a lack of proper documentation of traditional knowledge. For example, in Jamaica, the name ‘Timor’ is believed to indicate the country where this cultivar was collected. However, descriptions provided by the curator of the St. Vincent Botanical Garden, who received breadfruit plants, indicated that the breadfruit from Timor had leaves with deep sinuses [3, 29]. From this description, it appears that ‘Cassava’ or ‘Captain Bligh’ are the cultivars linked to the country of Timor. Therefore, the cultivar name ‘Timor’ with dentate leaves, does not seem to be associated with the country Timor as accepted in some parts of Jamaica. Therefore, this study corroborates previous studies showing that traditional vernacular names of breadfruit based on morphological traits and morphological comparisons among cultivars remain very important in understanding breadfruit biodiversity in any geographic region [30]. Based on the documented history of breadfruit introduction and distribution in the Anglophone Caribbean, it is not expected that the high number of vernacular names uncovered in this, and previous studies reflect the true number of cultivars found in the region. Nevertheless, an understanding of the folk taxonomy and use of vernacular names is important to support future studies. Further studies using more reliable techniques such as molecular markers are needed to clarify the diversity and help identify synonymy among cultivars in the region.

Breadfruit production is an important part of the livelihood of many communities across the Anglophone Caribbean. It is of nutritional, socio-cultural, environmental, and economic importance and has a role in food and nutrition security in the region. This study explored the ethnobotanical and traditional knowledge associated with breadfruit in the Anglophone Caribbean islands and recorded the patterns or systems associated with identifying and distinguishing breadfruit types or cultivars and the understanding of the biodiversity that exists. Data collected from the respondents confirmed that there is an abundance of traditional knowledge associated with breadfruit biodiversity in the region.

Conclusions and recommendations

Breadfruit vernacular names and systems of naming, describing, and classifying breadfruit types varied in different countries and within countries. Furthermore, clear morphological variations were observed, and in some cases, breadfruit types could be easily distinguished. However, some cultivars with the same names appeared morphologically different. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand the extent to which vernacular names represent genotypes that show distinct morphological, biochemical, and molecular characteristics in the Anglophone Caribbean. This could lead to a new and comprehensive classification scheme for breadfruit in the region and is important for conservation of the existing breadfruit germplasm.

Availability of data and materials

All data collected for this study were analyzed, interpreted, and included in this manuscript, but other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Zerega NJC, Ragone DC, Motley TJ. Complex origins of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae): implications for human migrations in Oceania. Am J Bot. 2004;91(5):760–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bligh W. The log of H. M. S. providence 1791–1793. England: Genesis Publications Limited; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leakey CLA. Breadfruit reconnaissance study in the Caribbean region. Cali, Colombia: CIAT/Interamerican Development Bank; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leakey C, Roberts-Nkrumah LB. The introduction of the breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg] to the West Indies-the role of Sir Joseph Banks. Trop Agric (Trin). 2016;93(1):32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Powell D. The voyage of the plant nursery, H. M. S. providence 1791–1793. Econ Bot. 1977;31(4):387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. An overview of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) in the Caribbean. Acta Hort. 2007;757:51–60.

  7. Gloster M, Roberts-Nkrumah LB. The importance of breadfruit grown in home gardens in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. In: Colon W, editor. Proceedings of the Caribbean food crop society 48th annual meeting 2012. Playa del Carmen Mexico: Caribbean Food Crop Society; 2012.

  8. Roberts-Nkrumah LB, Legall G. Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis, Moraceae) and chataigne (A. camansi) for food security and income generation: the case of Trinidad and Tobago. Econ Bot. 2013;67(4):324–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. The breadfruit germplasm collection at the University of the West Indies, St Augustine campus. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press; 2018.

  10. Bligh W. A voyage to the south sea: undertaken by command of his majesty, for the purpose of conveying the bread-fruit tree to the West Indies, in his majesty's ship the bounty, commanded by Lieutenant William Bligh. Including an account of the mutiny on board the said ship, and the subsequent voyage of part of the crew, in the ship's boat, from Tofoa, one of the friendly islands, to Timor, a dutch settlement in the East Indies. Austria: G. Nicol; 1972.

  11. Guilding L. An account of the botanic garden in the island of St. Vincent: from its first establishment to the present time. Glasgow: Richard Griffin and Company; 1825.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andrews L, Mason Jr G. Production of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) in the Eastern Caribbean. edited by D. Walmskey. In: Post-harvest management of tropical fruits and ornamentals in the Caribbean region. Trinidad and Tobago: The Technical Center for Agriculture and Rural Cooperation (CTA) and The Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute (CARDI); 1991.

  13. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. Towards a description of the breadfruit germplasm in St Vincent. Fruits. 1997;52(1):27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weir C, Tai EA, Weir C. Breadfruit. In: Fruit tree crop production in the Caribbean Region. Barbados: Caribbean Development Bank; 1983. p. 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Webster SA. The breadfruit in Jamaica: a commercial and horticultural perspective. Portland, Jamaica: Seymour Webster; 2006. p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. Breadfruit germplasm collection and evaluation at the University of the West Indies. edited by L. Wilson. In: Overcoming challenges to develop sustainable agri-food systems in the tropics. Port of Spain: International Congress on Tropical Agriculture; 2008.

  17. Ragone DC, Wiseman J. Developing and applying descriptors for breadfruit germplasm. Acta Hort. 2007;757:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Englberger L, et al. Carotenoid content and traditional knowledge of breadfruit cultivars of the republic of the Marshall Islands. J Food Compos Anal. 2014;34(2):192–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragone DC, et al. Nomenclature of breadfruit cultivars in Samoa: saliency, ambiguity and monomiality. J Ethnobiol. 2004;24(1):33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee RA, et al. Cultural dynamism and change: an example from the Federated States of Micronesia. Econ Bot. 2001;55(1):9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln NK, et al. Grow us our daily bread: a review of breadfruit cultivation in traditional and contemporary systems. Hortic Rev. 2018;46:299–384.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Navarro M et al. Vanuatu breadfruit project: survey on botanical diversity and traditional uses of Artocarpus altilis. In: Acta horticulturae. Nadi, Fiji: International Society for Horticultural Science; 2007.

  23. Roberts-Nkrumah LB, Badrie N. Breadfruit consumption, cooking methods and cultivar preference among consumers in Trinidad West Indies. Food Qual Prefer. 2005;16(3):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY; 2012.

  25. Beckford GL. Caribbean peasantry in the confines of the plantation mode of production. Int Soc Sci J. 1985;37(3):401–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barickman BJ. “A bit of land, which they call Roça”: slave provision grounds in the Bahian Recôncavo, 1780–1860. Hisp Am Hist Rev. 1994;74(4):649–87.

    Google Scholar 

  27. FAO, International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO: Rome; 2009.

  28. Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, et al. Indigenous knowledge and traditional conservation of fonio millet (Digitaria exilis, Digitaria iburua) in Togo. Biodivers Conserv. 2006;15(8):2379–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hooker JD. Artocarpus incise. Bread-fruit tree (α and β). Curtis Bot Mag. 1828;55:2869–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ragone DC. Description of pacific island breadfruit cultivars. Acta Hort. 1995;413:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. Bearing characteristics and yield in young trees of selected Caribbean Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis (Park.) Fosberg) Cultivars. In: Colon W, editor. Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crop Society 37th Annual Meeting 2001. Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago: Caribbean Food Crop Society. 2001.

  32. Roberts-Nkrumah LB. The breadfruit in Jamaica—a review. Jagrist 1990;2(2):4–9.

Download references


We are grateful to all respondents and informants who participated in the survey, shared their knowledge, and referred other respondents. We also acknowledge The University of the West Indies (UWI) for its financial support to conduct the survey.


The University of the West Indies is duly acknowledged for financial support to conduct the survey. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, and in the manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



OOD and LBRN conceived the study and developed the questionnaire. OOD, LBRN and MCG conducted the survey and carried out field work. OOD drafted the manuscript and performed statistical analysis. LBRN and ATA revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oral O. Daley.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by The University of The West Indies. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Before collecting data from respondents, they were informed about the purpose of the research and its benefits, clearly underlining the fact that the results will be used for academic purposes and that no commercial interest will be attached. A verbal agreement was obtained from respondents on whether or not to participate in the study, prior to administering the interview.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. There is no third-party data. This is our original research data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daley, O.O., Roberts-Nkrumah, L.B., Alleyne, A.T. et al. Folk nomenclature and traditional knowledge of breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg] diversity in four Anglophone Caribbean countries. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 18, 65 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Folk taxonomy
  • Genetic resource management
  • Local knowledge
  • On-farm conservation