Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Ethnopharmacological survey among migrants living in the Southeast Atlantic Forest of Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil

  • 1Email author,
  • 1 and
  • 2
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine20106:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-6-29

©  Garcia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

  • Received: 24 June 2010
  • Accepted: 29 October 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Understanding how people of diverse cultural backgrounds have traditionally used plants and animals as medicinal substances during displacements is one of the most important objectives of ethnopharmacological studies. An ethnopharmacological survey conducted among migrants living in the Southeast Atlantic Forest remnants (Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil) is presented herein.

Methods

Ethnographical methods were used to select and interview the migrants, and botanical and zoological techniques were employed to collect the indicated resources.

Results

We interviewed five migrants who described knowledge on 12 animals and 85 plants. Only 78 plants were present in Diadema, they belong to 37 taxonomic families; 68 were used exclusively for medicinal purposes, whereas 10 were reported to be toxic and/or presented some restriction of use. These taxa were grouped into 12 therapeutic categories (e.g., gastrointestinal disturbances, inflammatory processes or respiratory problems) based on the 41 individual complaints cited by the migrants. While the twelve animal species were used by the migrants to treat nine complaints; these were divided into six categories, the largest of which related to respiratory problems. None of the animal species and only 57 of the 78 plant species analysed in the present study were previously reported in the pharmacological literature; the popular knowledge concurred with academic findings for 30 of the plants. The seven plants [Impatiens hawkeri W. Bull., Artemisia canphorata Vill., Equisetum arvensis L., Senna pendula (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby, Zea mays L., Fevillea passiflora Vell. and Croton fuscescens Spreng)] and the two animals (Atta sexdens and Periplaneta americana) that showed maintenance of use among migrants during their displacement in Brazilian territory, have not been studied by pharmacologists yet.

Conclusions

Thus, they should be highlighted and focused in further pharmacology and phytochemical studies, since the persistence of their uses can be indicative of bioactive potentials.

Keywords

  • Bioactive Potential
  • Achillea Millefolium
  • Allopathic Medicine
  • Taxonomic Family
  • Equisetum Arvensis

Background

Cultural mixing mediated by the migration of people around the world has generated increasing interest in recent years within the field of ethnopharmacology [1]. Medicinal plants have been used by human societies throughout history, also across geographical barriers [2]. The continuous use of certain plants and animals for medicinal purposes over time reflects their potential therapeutic value. Such substances become even more promising when they are persistently used by migrating human groups despite the considerable distances travelled and the consequent exposure to different cultures and vegetal resources. Numerous studies have collected information on medicinal plants from ethnic groups who migrated from Mexico to the U.S.A. [3, 4]; from Haiti to Cuba [5]; from Africa to South America [6]; from Africa to Brazil [7]; from Colombia to London [8]; from Suriname to the Netherlands [9]; from Albania to southern Italy [10, 11]; from Germany to eastern Italy [12]; and from Europe and Africa to eastern Cuba [1, 13]. However, few studies have focused on migration within a country, such as that described by Rodrigues et al. [14] regarding migrants from northeastern Brazil who currently occupy the southeast.

Brazil offers a favourable environment for studies focused on migration and medicinal plants/animals because it possesses a large area of 8,514,876.599 km2 [15] and boasts high indices of cultural and biological diversity. Brazil is inhabited by rural and urban populations of 232 indigenous ethnic groups [16], 1,342 Quilombola groups (descendants of Afro-Brazilian people) [17], and mestizo groups derived from the miscegenation of Indian, Black, European and Asiatic people. Brazil also houses 55,000 species of higher plants [18] and almost 7% of global animal diversity was described (ca. 100,000 out of 1.5 million), though some estimates suggest that this number is significantly higher [19]. Migration between regions of this country encourages contact with the rich biological and cultural diversity and allows interpersonal interactions that contribute to the transformation of local medicinal therapies.

According to Simões and Lino [20], the original Atlantic Forest covered approximately 1.3 million km2, spanning 17 Brazilian states from south to northeast; however, it currently covers only 14 states, and its area has been reduced to 65,000 km2. Despite considerable fragmentation, the Atlantic Forest still contains more than 20,000 plant species (8,000 endemic) and 1,361 animal species (567 endemic). It is the richest forest in the world in wood plants per unit area; the southern Bahia, for example, holds a record of 454 different species/ha [21].

The objective of this study was to perform an ethnopharmacological survey among migrants from northeastern and southeastern Brazil who currently live in Atlantic Forest remnants in the municipality of Diadema (São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil). We attempted to understand how the medicinal use of certain plant and animal changed as a result of the migrants' contact with new therapies, diseases and natural resources found in Diadema. These findings were classified as either: maintenance, replacement, incorporation or discontinuation of plants/animals use.

These objectives are in agreement with several stated goals of ethnopharmacology, namely, to investigate how migration can influence knowledge of medicinal plants/animals, the extent to which displaced people incorporate new species into their therapeutic methods, and, in particular, why individuals sometimes persistently adhere to old customs, before or even after they are exposed to new possibilities. Therefore, we adopt the hypothesis that the use of plants/animals as medicines is influenced by migratory movements, and access to natural resources available in the municipality of Diadema.

Methodology

Fieldwork

One of the authors (D. Garcia) spent 14 months (September 2007 to November 2008) in the municipality of Diadema, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (23°41'10"S, 46°37'22"W) (Figure 1), selecting, observing and interviewing migrants living in the Atlantic Forest remnants. Diadema is located 16 kilometres from the capital São Paulo, covers an area of 30.65 km2, and is occupied by 394.266 inhabitants [15], most of whom are migrants from other regions of Brazil. The municipality has a literacy rate of 6.8% [22], and its Human Development Index is 0.79 [23]. The Atlantic Forest remnants found in this city are rich in plants that are either native or introduced by the influence of those migrants present both in urban and rural areas.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Location of the Municipality of Diadema, in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil (black square). Interviewees' migration from their cities of origin to Diadema, being PE (Pernambuco state), SE (Sergipe), MG (Minas Gerais) and SP (São Paulo), and the distance of the displacement in each case (in Km).

Migrants who had relevant knowledge regarding the use of plants and animals for medicinal purposes were selected for interviews following the purposive sampling method [24]. Thus, we sought information about the presence of migrants from herb traders, health care professionals, and some local prayer-makers. According to Bernard [24], this sampling is also known as judgment sampling, utilized during qualitative research in particular in those populations that are difficult to be localized, the researcher selects interviewees based on their trial that they meet the criteria for the study of the phenomenon of interest. After identifying potential interviewees, the researcher visited them to determine whether they did indeed possess knowledge on medicinal plants and whether they wanted to take part in this study. The ethnopharmacological study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP's Ethics Committee on Research 1969/07) and Conselho de Gestão do Patrimônio Genético (No. 02000.001 049/2008-71). The interviewees also signed consent forms granting permission to access their knowledge and collect botanical and zoological material.

Personal and ethnopharmacological data from the interviewees were obtained through informal and semi-structured interviews [24] that addressed the following topics: personal details and migration history (name, sex, age, religion, marital status, place of birth, migration, main occupation, grade of schooling) as well as ethnopharmacology (name of natural resource, use, part used, formula, route of administration, contraindications, dosages, restrictions of use). The author (D. Garcia) has visited each interviewee at least 12 times, in order to fill in the forms mentioned above, as well as to understand their processes of acquiring knowledge in depth.

Each medicinal plant was collected in the presence of the person who described it during the interviews, in accordance with the methods suggested by Lipp [25]. The plants' scientific names were determined by specialists from the Instituto de Botânica do Estado de São Paulo (IB), and vouchers were deposited at the Herbário Municipal de São Paulo (PMSP). The animals collected were placed in glass vials containing 70% ethyl alcohol, and their subsequent identification and deposit were performed by zoologists from the Museum of Zoology, Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP) and the Bioscience Institute from Universidade de São Paulo (IB-USP).

When interviewees cited plants and animals that were used only in their cities of origin, i.e., not available in Diadema, photos from the literature and other information (e.g., popular name, habits and habitat) were used to identify them to at least the genus level. These organisms are marked with asterisks throughout the text and in Table 1. The Herpetofauna of the Northeast Atlantic Forest [26] and The Herpetofauna of Caatingas and Altitudes Areas of the Brazilian Northeast [27] were used as identification guides. For plants, we also consulted Medicinal Plants in Brazil - Native and Exotic [28].
Table 1

The 12 animals indicated by migrant PE2, their popular and scientific names, complaints (part used), formula and route of administration.

Popular name dynamic of use

Scientific name or only genus (family/class) Voucher

Complaint (part used) - formula - route of administration

1- Snake (cobra)°

Chironius sp., Liophs sp. (Colubridae/Reptilia)* or Bothops sp. (Viperidae/Reptilia)*

Bronchitis (skin) - powder - ingested

2- Rattlesnake (cascavel)°

Crotalus cf. durissus L. (Viperidae/Reptilia)*

Back pain (fat) - in natura - ingested

  

Bronchitis (rattle) - tie it in the neck - topic

  

Heart problems (tooth) - put it in the pocket of shirt

3- Cururu frog (sapo-cururu)°

Rhinella sp. (Bufonidae/Amphibia)*

Cancer of skin (whole animal) - in natura: tie it on the cancer for some time each day - topic

4- Alligator (jacaré)°

Crocodilus sp., Cayman sp. or Paleosuchus sp. (Alligatoridae/Reptilia)*

Apoplexy (skin) - syrup of skin powder - ingested

  

Bronchitis (bone) - powder - ingested

5- Turtle (tartaruga)°

Geochelone sp. (Testudinidae/Reptilia)*

Bronchitis and asthma - (turtleshell) - powder - ingested

6- Capybara (capivara)°

Hydrochoerus cf. hydrochaeris L. (Hydrochaeridae/Mammalia)*

Bronchitis and asthma - (skin) - powder - ingested

7-Iguana (iguana)°

Iguana cf. iguana L. (Iguanidae/Reptilia) *

Osteoporosis and rheumatism (bone) - powder - ingested

8- Ant (formiga) □

Atta sexdens L. (Formicidae/Insecta) Garcia 001

Epilepsy (anthill) - in natura - ingested

9- Cockroach (barata) □

Periplaneta americana L. (Blattidae/Insecta)

Garcia 002

Bronchitis and asthma (whole animal) - powder - ingested

10- Water cockroach (barata d'água)°

Abedus sp., Belostoma sp. or Diplonychus sp. (Belostomatidae/Insecta)*

Bronchitis and asthma (whole animal) - powder - ingested

11- Lizard (calango)°

Placosoma sp. (Gymnophthalmidae/Reptilia)*

Wounds in the body (skin) - powder - ingested

12- Armadillo-ball (tatu-bola)°

Tolypeutes sp. (Dasypodidae/Mammalia)*

Wounds in the body (skin) - powder - ingested

Marked by (□) the two animals whose use had been maintained, while 10, marked by (°) are those whose uses have fallen into disuse.

* Animals that couldn't be collected because were not available in Diadema

Database survey

For the plants and animals identified to the species level, we searched the bibliographic databases PUBMED [29] and SCIFINDER [30] to determine whether they had been targets of previous pharmacological studies. To determine the origin of each plant species, we consulted the Dictionary of Useful Plants: exotic and native [31].

Dynamics of use

During our field work, we made an effort to understand the dynamics of use for each resource and classified them into the following four categories: maintenance of use (resource used for the same purpose in the migrant's city of origin and in Diadema), replacement (resources that were replaced when migrants arrived in Diadema because the original product was not available in Diadema or was less effective than the new resource), incorporation (resources used for the first time in Diadema to treat diseases common to larger cities, such as hypertension, diabetes and anxiety, which were not common in their homeland), and finally discontinued use (resources that are no longer used in Diadema, usually because they are not available).

Data analysis

The level of homogeneity between plant information provided by different migrants was calculated using the Informants' Consensus Factor, Fic [32]. This term is calculated as Fic = Nur - Nt /(Nur - 1), where Nur is the number of use reports from informants for a particular plant-usage category and Nt is the number of taxa or species used for that plant usage category across all informants. Values range between 0 and 1, with 1 indicating the highest level of informant consent. For instance, if certain taxa are consistently used by informants, then a high degree of consensus is reached and medicinal traditions are viewed as well-defined [33].

Results and Discussion

Migrant Interviews

Despite the fact that Diadema is composed by thousands of migrants, we observed that only a few have retained traditional knowledge pertaining to medicinal plants and animals. Some considerations should be made, in order to justify our decision of conducing a qualitative approach, in depth, with the sample of interviewees obtained during the two months prior to the start of the study. During this time we observed that in many cases, this knowledge has fallen into disuse because of: a) a cultural adaptation to the new city, b) the ease of conventional medical care, c) forest degradation, which restricts use of local plants and animals, furthermore d) many migrants have shown concern to participate in the study, since in the past they suffered persecution from government agencies and physicians, who eventually restrained their medical practice.

The five selected interviewees migrated from northeast and southeast Brazil and established themselves in Diadema in the 1940 s. Three were born in the northeast: two in Pernambuco state (coded as PE1 and PE2) and one in Sergipe state (SE1). The two remaining migrants were born in the southeast: one in Minas Gerais state (MG1) and one in inland São Paulo state (SP1) (Figure 1). All interviewees were Catholic, married and retired, with the exception of PE1 and PE2 who sell medicinal plants. Their average age was approximately 68 years old (ranging from 53 to 80 years old), and their level of education was semi-illiterate to illiterate. They learned about the medicinal uses of plants and animals from their parents and grandparents (Brazilian natives, European and African descendants) in their homelands. All interviewees arrived in the city of Diadema as adults, and some had migrated through different regions of Brazil, accumulating knowledge on natural resources from human and biological sources. In Diadema, they acquired knowledge from neighbours, books, media (radio, television, magazines), and personal experiences.

Plants: dynamics of use

The migrants described their knowledge of 85 plant specimens. As can be seen in Table 2, 78 of them were available in Diadema and were collected, resulting in 65 plant species, the remaining 13 could only be identified to the generic level. The plants belong to 37 taxonomic families, with Asteraceae (16 species), Lamiaceae (8) and Euphorbiaceae (7) as the most common. Previous studies have shown that Asteraceae species are the group most commonly reported to have potential pharmacological properties, not only in the Atlantic Forest [34–36] but also in other Brazilian biomes such as the Amazon Forest [37] the pantanal wetlands [38] and the cerrado savannahs [39]. In a review focusing on plants with possible action/effects on the central nervous system that were indicated by 26 Brazilian indigenous peoples occupying different Brazilian biomes [14], Asteraceae was the second most commonly cited family. The same pattern has been detected in other countries, such as Mexico [40]. One factor that may explain the common use of this taxonomic family is the large number of species belonging to it - about 20,000 [41]. Asteraceae also has a wide geographical distribution, both in Brazil and throughout the world [42], which facilitates its use by various cultures.
Table 2

The 78 plant specimens used by five Diadema's migrants (MG1, SP1, PE1, PE2, SE1)*.

Popular(s) name(s)

(migrant)dynamic of use

Specimen (family)

Voucher

Origin - geographical distribution - cultivated (C) or spontaneous (S)

Use (part)

Formula and route of administration

Pharmacological studies

1-Alamanda-amarela

(SE1□, PE1Δ)

Allamanda cathartica L. (Apocynaceae)

Garcia 076

Native - Brazilian territory (C)

Toxic (whole plant)

Any oral dose is dangerous

Healing activity [65]

2-Alecrim (MG1)□

Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 060

Exotic - all countries with temperate climate (C)

Muscle pain* (leaves)

Decoction - massage

Antibacterial effects [66], antimicrobial effect [67], anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor effects [68], cause reduction of reproductive fertility in male rats [69], antinociceptive effect [70], mosquito repellent activity [71], antidiabetic and antioxidant properties [72]

3-Alecrim-do-campo

(SE1)□

Baccharis dracunculifolia DC (Asteraceae)

Garcia 021

Native - central Brazil (S)

Soothing (aerial parts)

Smoking - inhalation

Bactericidal activity [73], cytotoxic [74], antiulcerogenic [75], antimicrobial and antifungal [76]and anti-inflammatory [77]

4-Alfavaca

(SP1)□

Ocimum selloi Benth. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 033

Native - northeast to south Brazil (C)

Soothing (aerial parts)

Infusion - inhalation

Mosquito repellent activity [78]

   

Bronchitis (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

 

5-Algodão

(MG1)□

Gossypium sp. (Malvaceae)

Garcia 066

No data (C)

Anti-inflammatory (leaves)

Infusion - inhalation

Not consulted

6-Algodão-do-mato

(MG1, PE2)□

Asclepias curassavica L. (Apocynaceae)

Garcia 037

Exotic - Brazilian territory (S)

Toxic* (whole plant)

Any oral dose is dangerous

Cancer and warts treatment [79]and poisoning [80]

7-Almeirão-boca-de-leão (SE1)Δ

Hypochoeris sp. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 009

No data (S)

Liver pain (leaves)

In natura - ingestion

Not consulted

8-Amendoim-bravo, burra-leiteira (MG1, SP1, SE1, PE1, PE2)□

Euphorbia heterophylla L. (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 047

Native - Americas (S)

Toxic* (whole plant)

Any oral dose is dangerous

Cytotoxic properties [81]

9-Anador (SE1)□

Alternanthera sp. (Amaranthaceae)

Garcia 039

No data (C)

Soothing, headache, pain in the body (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Not consulted

10-Arnica (PE1)□

Porophyllum ruderale (Jacq.) Cass. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 075

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Muscle pain* (aerial parts)

Decoction - massage

Anti-inflammatory [82]

11-Aroeira (MG1)□

Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae)

Garcia 035

Native - northeast to south Brazil (S)

Diuretic (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Antifungal activity [83]and antibacterial [84]

12-Arruda (MG1, PE1, PE2)□

Ruta graveolens L. (Rutaceae)

Garcia 028

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Earache and conjunctivitis/styl* (leaves)

In natura - topic

Antifertility [85], fungicide [86], cytotoxic [87], abortive [88], anti-tumour [89], anti-inflammatory [90], antiarrhythmic [91]and antimicrobial [92]

   

Muscle pain (leaves)

Decoction - massage

 

13- Assa-peixe (MG1, SE1)□

Vernonia sp. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 048

No data (S)

Bronchitis (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Not consulted

   

Expectorant (leaves)

Infusion - inhalation

 
   

Healing wounds (leaves)

infusion - plaster

 

14-Avelóz (PE1, PE2)□

Euphorbia tirucalli L. (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 046

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Toxic* (whole plant)

Restricted use (reports of blindness)

Anti-tumour activity [93], cause eye injury [94]and effect against arthritis diseases [95]

   

Breast cancer* (latex)

Macerate - ingestion

 

15-Azaléia (PE1)Δ

Rhododendron simsii Planch. (Ericaceae)

Garcia 043

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Toxic (whole plant)

Any oral dose is dangerous

Antioxidative [96]

16-Bálsamo (MG1, SP1, PE1, SE1)□

Sedum sp. (Crassulaceae)

Garcia 038

No data (C)

Earache (leaves)

In natura - topic

Not consulted

   

Laxative (aerial parts)

In natura - ingestion

 

17-Boldo-do-Chile, figatil (PE1□, SE1Δ)

Vernonia condensata Baker (Asteraceae)

Garcia 001

Exotic - northeast to southeast Brazil (C)

Liver pain* (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Anti-ulcerogenic [97]and analgesic and anti-inflammatory [98]

18-Brinco-de-princesa (SE1)Δ

Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B.L. Burtt & R.M. Sm. (Zingiberaceae)

Garcia 018

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Sedative (flowers)

Infusion - ingestion

Antihypertensive effects [99], antinociceptive [100], anti-amoebic activity [101]and hepatoprotector [102]

19-Café (MG1)□

Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae)

Garcia 030

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Diabetes (ripe fruits)

Infusion

Antioxidant [103]

   

Sinusitis (powder fruit)

Infusion

 

20-Cana-do-brejo (SP1, PE2)□

Costus spiralis (Jacq.) Roscoe (Costaceae)

Garcia 019

Native - northeast and southeast Brazil (S)

Laxative and rheumatism (leaves)

Infusion or decoction - ingestion

Antiurolithiatic [104]

21-Cânfora (MG1, PE1, SE1)□

Artemisia canphorata Vill. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 045

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Muscle pain (whole plant)

Decoction - massage

No data found

22-Capim-limão (MG1, SE1,

PE2)□

Cymbopogon citratus DC. - Stapf. (Poaceae)

Garcia 026

Exotic - tropical countries (C)

Bronchitis* (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

Anxiolytic [105], larvicidal activity [106], antibacterial [107], antimalarial activity [108], insect repellent [109], hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects [110]and antimicrobial activity [92]

   

Sedative* (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

 

23-Capuchinha (SP1, MG1)Δ

Tropaeolum majus L. (Tropaeolaceae)

Garcia 057

Exotic - south and southeast Brazil (C)

Ulcer and laxative (aerial parts)

Infusion or in natura - ingestion

Antitumor activity [111]

24-Carqueja (MG1)□

Baccharis trimera (Less) DC (Asteraceae)

Garcia 027

Native - south and southeast Brazil (C)

Diabetes* (whole plant)

Macerate - ingestion

Antihepatotoxic properties [112], anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity [113], relaxant effect [114], anti-proteolytic and anti-hemorrhagic properties [115], antioxidant compounds [116], antidiabetic activity [117]and for losing weight [118]

25-Carrapicho (SE1#, MG1□)

Acanthospermum australe (Loefl.) Kuntze (Asteraceae)

Garcia 052

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Wounds in the body (roots)

Medicinal wine - ingestion

Antimalarial activity [119]and antifungal activity [120]

26-Cavalinha (MG1)□

Equisetum arvensis L. (Equisetaceae)

Garcia 051

Exotic (C)

Diuretic (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

No data found

27-Cipó-cruz (SE1, PE2)Δ

Serjania sp. (Sapindaceae)

Garcia 012

No data (S)

Reduces cholesterol and diarrhea (leaves)

Macerate - ingestion

Not consulted

   

External allergies, wounds in the body and detoxifying (leaves)

Infusion - bath

 

28-Comigo-ninguém-pode (PE1)□

Dieffenbachia sp. (Araceae)

Garcia 071

No data (C)

Toxic (whole plant)

Any oral dose is dangerous

Not consulted

29-Dormideira (SE1)□

Mimosa pudica L. (Fabaceae s.l.)

Garcia 069

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Healing wounds (aerial parts)

In natura - plaster

Antidepressant activity [121], antitoxin of the snake Naja kaouthia[122], anticonvulsant [123]and for reproductive problems [124]

30-Embaúba (MG1, SE1)□

Cecropia pachystachya Tréc. (Cecropiaceae)

Garcia 068

Native - south to northeast Brazil (S)

Bronchitis* (powder fruit)

Syrup - ingestion

Antioxidative activity [125], cardiotonic and sedative effects [126]and anti-inflammatory [127]

   

Toxic (sap)

Any oral dose is dangerous

 

31-Erva-cidreira (MG1, SE1, PE2)□

Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Br. (Verbenaceae)

Garcia 005

Native - almost all Brazilian territory (S)

Expectorant* (aerial parts)

Infusion - inhalation

Treatment of respiratory diseases [128], antiulcerogenic activity [129], sedative and anticonvulsant effects [130], antiviral and antiherpes [131]

   

Sedative* (aerial parts)

Infusion or decoction - ingestion

 

32-Erva-de-bicho (SE1)□

Ludwigia sp. (Onagraceae)

Garcia 078

No data (S)

Hemorrhoid (whole plant)

Decoction - bath

Not consulted

33-Erva-doce, funcho (MG1, SP1, PE1, PE2)□

Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (Apiaceae)

Garcia 064

Exotic -Brazilian territory (C)

Sedative (whole plant)

Infusion - ingestion

Antimicrobial activity [132], anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant activities [133], acaricidal activity [134], antifungal effect [135], antithrombotic activity [136]and larvicidal activity of the mosquito Aedes aegypti[137]

   

Bronchitis* (whole plant)

Infusion - inhalation

 
   

Laxative (whole plant)

Infusion or macerate - ingestion

 

34-Eucalipto, vick (MG1□, PE1Δ, PE2Δ, SE1□)

Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (Myrtaceae)

Garcia 055

Exotic (C)

Sinusitis* (leaves)

Infusion - inhalation

Antihyperglycemic actions [138], analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects [139], antimicrobial activity [140]and antibacterial effects [141]

35-Fedegoso (MG1)□

Senna pendula (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby (Fabaceae s.l.)

Garcia 034

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Osteoporosis

prevention (roots)

Medicinal wine - ingestion

No data found

36-Feijão-guandu (SP1)□

Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (Fabaceae s.l.)

Garcia 003

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion or inhalation

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis [142], antileishmanial and antifungal activity [143]and hypocholesterolemic effect [144]

37-Folha-santa, folha-da-fortuna (MG1, SP1, PE1)□

Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken (Crassulaceae)

Garcia 040

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Lumbar pain* (leaves)

In natura - plaster

Antibacterial activity [145], anti-ulcer [146], antimicrobial [147], antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic [148]and neurosedative and muscle relaxant activities [149]

   

Sedative* (leaves)

In natura - plaster

 

38-Gervão (MG1)□

Stachytarpheta cayennensis (Rich.) Vahl (Verbenaceae)

Garcia 054

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Laxative (aerial parts)

Infusion or decoction - ingestion

Anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcerogenic properties [150]and hypoglycaemic constituents [151]

39-Goiaba (SE1)□

Psidium guajava L. (Myrtaceae)

Garcia 058

Native - Mexico to Brazil (S)

Heartburn (leaves)

Infusion or in natura - ingestion

Antibacterial activity [152–154]and hepatoprotective activity [155]

   

Diarrhea (fruit)

In natura - ingestion

 

40-Guaco (PE1□, PE2□, SE1Δ)

Mikania glomerata Spreng. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 032

Native - northeast to southeast Brazil (S)

Bronchitis* (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities [156], bronchodilator activity [157]and antiophidian properties [158]

41-Guanxuma (SE1)Δ

Sida rhombifolia L. (Malvaceae)

Garcia 067

Exotic - Brazilian territory (S)

Sedative (aerial parts)

Infusion - ingestion or inhalation

Cytotoxicity, antibacterial activity [159]and antioxidant [160]

42-Guiné (SE1)Δ

Petiveria alliaceae L. (Phytolaccaceae)

Garcia 004

Native - north Brazil (S)

Sedative (aerial parts)

Environment purifier - inhalation

Antimicrobial substance [161], antimitotic action [162], anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects [163], antibacterial and antifungal activity [164]and antioxidant [165]

   

Muscle pain* (leaves)

Decoction - massage

 

43-Hortelã (MG1, PE1)□

Mentha arvensis L. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 031

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis* (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

Antifungal property [166], vasodilatory actions [167], antioxidative activity [168], antibacterial properties [107]and insect repellents and fumigants [109]

   

Laxative (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

 

44-Hortelã-grande (PE1)□

Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 073

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

For digestion and urine with blood (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Scorpion venon antidote [169]and antimicrobial activity [92]

   

Cough (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

 

45-Impatiens (PE1)Δ

Impatiens hawkeri W. Bull. (Balsaminaceae)

Garcia 044

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Toxic (whole plant)

In closed environment causes tearing, allergy and headache

No data found

46-Jarnaúba (PE1)Δ

Synadenium grantii Hook. F. (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 074

Exotic - southeast to northeast Brazil (C)

Toxic (whole plant)

Restricted use

Healing action and anti-hemorrhagic [170]

   

Stomach cancer (latex)

Macerate - ingestion

 

47-Jurubeba (MG1, SE1, PE2)□

Solanum variabile Mart. (Solanaceae)

Garcia 056

Native - southeast and south Brazil (S)

Sedative (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Antiulcerogenic activity [171]

   

Laxative (powder fruit)

In natura - ingestion

 

48-Limão (MG1)□

Citrus aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle (Rutaceae)

Garcia 063

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Fever (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Mosquito repellent activity [172]

49-Losna (SP1, SE1, PE2)□

Artemisia absinthium L. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 049

Exotic - Brazilian territory (S)

Laxative (aerial parts)

Infusion - ingestion

Acaricidal properties [173], antifungal and antibacterial [174]and antioxidant activities [175]

50-Malva-branca (SE1)□

Waltheria indica L. (Sterculiaceae)

Garcia 077

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Gingivitis* (leaves)

Infusion - gargling

Anti-inflammatory activities [176]

   

Inflammation in the mouth and/or throat* (leaves)

  

51-Malva-de-cheiro (MG1)□

Malva sylvestris L. (Malvaceae)

Garcia 059

Exotic - south and southeast Brazil (S)

Wounds in the body (roots)

Medicinal wine - ingestion

Skin anti-aging property [177]

52-Mamão-papaia (PE1)□

Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae)

Garcia 062

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis* (powder fruit)

Syrup - ingestion

Abortive [178], antibacterial activity [179], diuretic [180]and healing and abortive effects [181]

53-Mandioca (SE1)□

Manihot esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 050

Native - Brazilian territory (C)

conjunctivitis/sty* (dew on the leaves)

In natura - topic

Analgesics and anti-inflammatory effects [182]

54-Manjericão (MG1)□

Ocimum basilicum L. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 061

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis* (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

Antibacterial [183], mosquito repellent activity [184], antimicrobial activity [185], antigiardial activity [186]and decreases cholesterol [187]

55-Maravilha (SP1, PE2)□

Mirabilis jalapa L. (Nyctaginaceae)

Garcia 065

Native - Brazilian territory (C)

Healing wounds* (aerial parts)

Infusion - plaster

Antibacterial effect [188]and antimicrobial [189]

56-Maria-pretinha (MG1)□

Solanum americanum L. (Solanaceae)

Garcia 070

Native - Americas (S)

Sore throat* (aerial parts)

Infusion - gargle

Treatment of protozoal infections ( American trypanosomes ) [190]and moderate antioxidant activity [191]

57-Mentrasto (PE1)□

Ageratum conyzoides L. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 010

Native - southeast to northeast Brazil

(S)

Bronchitis* (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Anti-inflammatory [192], toxic [193], antibacterial [194]and insecticidal activity [195]

   

Rheumatism* (whole plant)

Infusion - bath

 

58-Mentruz, erva-de-santa-maria (PE1#, SE1□)

Chenopodium ambrosioides L. (Chenopodiaceae)

Garcia 006

Native - south and southeast Brazil (S)

Muscle pain (aerial parts)

Decoction - massage

Insecticidal properties [196], antifungal, antiaflatoxigenic and antioxidant activity [197]and mosquito repellent activity [71]

   

Lesions in bone (aerial parts)

In natura - plaster

 
   

Worm* (aerial parts)

Infusion - ingestion

 
   

Bronchitis (aerial parts)

Syrup - ingestion

 

59-Milho (SE1)□

Zea mays L. (Poaceae)

Garcia 023

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis (flowers)

Syrup - ingestion

No data found

   

Blood purifier and diuretic (flowers)

Infusion - ingestion

 

60-Novalgina (MG1, SE1)□

Achillea millefolium L. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 015

Exotic - south and southeast Brazil (C)

Sedative (leaves)

In natura - ingestion

Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity [198]

61-Pariparoba (MG1)□

Piper umbellatum L. (Piperaceae)

Garcia 072

Native - Tropical America (S)

Belly ache and liver pain (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Antioxidant [199]and antifungal activity [200]

62-Picão (MG1)□

Calea sp. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 036

No data (S)

Diuretic (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Not consulted

63-Picão-preto (MG1, PE1)□, Picão-branco (SP1)□

Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 020

Native - tropical America (S)

Blood purifier (whole plant)

Infusion - ingestion

Hypotensive effects [201], anti-inflammatory activity [202], anticancer and antipyretic activity [203], antimicrobial [204]and antitumor potential [205]

   

Healing wounds* (whole plant)

In natura - plaster

 
   

Wounds in the body* (roots)

Medicinal wine - ingestion

 

64-Pinhão-roxo (SP1)□

Jatropha gossypiifolia L. (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 017

Native - southeast to northeast Brazil (S)

Laxative (powder fruit)

In natura - ingestion

Antimalarial effects [206], hypotensive and vasorelaxant effects [207]

65-Poejo (MG1, PE2)□

Mentha pulegium L. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 029

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Bronchitis (leaves)

Syrup - ingestion

Larvicidal activity [208], acaricidal effects [209]and insecticidal properties [210]

66-Pucunã (SE1)□

Fevillea passiflora Vell. (Cucurbitaceae)

Garcia 022

Native - North and southeast Brazil (S)

Toxic - abortive (seeds)

In natura - ingestion

No data found

67-Quebra-pedra (SP1, PE1, PE2, SE1)□

Phyllanthus caroliniensis Walter (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 024

Native - USA to Brazil (S)

Kidney stone* (aerial parts)

Infusion or decoction - ingestion

Antinociceptive action [211]

68-Quitoco (SE1)□

Pluchea sagittalis (Lam.) Cabrera (Asteraceae)

Garcia 042

Native - south and southeast Brazil (S)

Diuretic (aerial parts)

Infusion - ingestion

Anti-inflammatory activity [212]

69-Rubim (MG1, SP1)□

Leonurus sibiricus L. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 002

Exotic - Brazilian territory (C)

Healing wounds* (aerial parts)

In natura - plaster

Stimulating action on the uterus [213], analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity [214]and antibacterial activity [215]

70-Sabugueiro (MG1)□

Sambucus canadensis L. (Caprifoliaceae)

Garcia 025

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Bronchitis* (flowers)

Syrup - ingestion

Infectious diseases and antioxidant activity [216]

71-Salsa-parreira (SE1)□

Jacaranda sp.

(Bignoniaceae)

Garcia 011

No data (S)

External allergies, wounds in the body and purifier (leaves)

Decoction - bath

Not consulted

72-Samba-caitá (SE1)□

Hyptis sp. (Lamiaceae)

Garcia 041

No data (S)

Belly ache (leaves)

In natura - ingestion

Not consulted

73-Serralha (PE1)□

Sonchus oleraceus L. (Asteraceae)

Garcia 016

Exotic - Brazilian territory (S)

Diabetes (leaves)

In natura - ingestion

Larvicidal potential [217]

74-Sete-sangria (MG1□, SP1□, SE1Δ)

Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J. F. Macbr. (Lythraceae)

Garcia 007

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Intestinal infections and heart problems* (aerial parts)

Infusion - ingestion

Antiinflammatory and antinociceptive activities [218], vasorelaxant properties [219], treat high levels of cholesterol and triglycerides [220]

75-Sofre-do-rim-quem-qué (MG1)#

Cissus sp. (Vitaceae)

Garcia 053

No data (S)

Kidney stone (leaves)

Infusion - ingestion

Not consulted

76-Tanchagem (SP1, PE2)□

Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae)

Garcia 008

No data (S)

Anti-inflammatory - mouth and throat (leaves)

Decoction - gargling

Not consulted

77-Vassourinha (SE1, PE2)□

Scoparia dulcis L. (Scrophulariaceae)

Garcia 014

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Hip pain/kidneys (leaves)

Decoction - bath

Antitumor-promoting activity [221], antioxidant [222], antimicrobial and antifungal activities [223]

78-Velando (SE1)□

Croton fuscescens Spreng (Euphorbiaceae)

Garcia 013

Native - Brazilian territory (S)

Inhibits the growth of skin stains/wounds in the body (resin)

In natura - topic

No data found

* their popular and scientific names, geographical origin and distribution, if cultivated or spontaneous, uses, parts utilized, formula, route of administration and pharmacological studies. Marked by (□) the 68 plants whose use had been maintained by the respective migrant, while 14, marked by (Δ) are those whose applications have been incorporated by migrants, finally, 3 (#) are replacements. The matches between the uses proclaimed by the interviewees and pharmacological data have been posted by (*).

From the 65 species identified, it was observed that 33 are native to Brazil while the other 32 are exotic, demonstrating the great floral diversity of the region, which was influenced by European and African people during the civilizing process in Brazil. Furthermore, of the 78 specimens recorded, 54% (42) are spontaneous or were already available in Diadema when interviewees arrived there, while 46% (36) were grown by the migrants, acquired in free markets, or brought from other regions of the country during migration. Below, we describe the four 'dynamics of use' categories observed during this study.

Maintenance of use

According to the interviewees, 68 of the 78 specimens cited in the present study, were used in their homelands (highlighted with □ in Table 2). The maintenance of their uses was possible since most of them were available in Diadema, though some were brought from their homelands. SE1 brought four plants from Aquidabã - Sergipe state, for pain relief because they are not available or are more potent than the ones found in Diadema: "bálsamo" (Sedum sp.), "anador" (Alternanthera sp.), "eucalipto/vick" (Eucalyptus globulus Labill.) and "novalgina" (Achillea millefolium L.).

Incorporation of use

Fourteen of the 78 specimens listed in Table 2 came to be used by migrants when they arrived in Diadema (highlighted with Δ in Table 2). These incorporations occurred in several ways: through information given by neighbours; through local media, e.g., television, radio, magazines; or through personal efforts, guided by plant organoleptic properties or even by the theory of signatures. This theory, formulated by Paracelsus (XVI century), assumes that characteristics and virtues of herbs can be recognised by their external appearance or "signature" (picture, shape, colour). Finally, observing the relationship between animals and plants can be a valuable guide. PE1 noted that dogs consume "sete-sangria" (Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J. F. Macbr.) when they have diarrhoea; and because it seemed to alleviate their symptoms, he started to use this plant for the same purpose.

The migrants incorporated several plants after their arrival in Diadema to treat typical diseases of larger cities: "cipó-cruz" (Serjania sp.) to combat high cholesterol; and "guanxuma" (Sida rhombifolia L.) and "guiné" (Petiveria alliaceae L.) for anxiety. Also included in this category was knowledge concerning local toxic plants, e.g., alamanda-amarela (Allamanda cathartica L.) and azaléia (Rhododendron simsii Planch.), detailing the risks associated with their consumption.

Replacement of use

Three plants used by migrants in their cities of origin were replaced because they were not available or were less effective than plants present in Diadema (highlighted with # in Table 2). Most of these replacements were made according to the criteria listed in the previous section.

The interviewee MG1 explained that in his homelands, he used "quebra-pedra"* (Phyllanthus cf. caroliniensis Walter - Euphorbiaceae) for kidney stone disturbance, but when he arrived in Diadema, he found another plant, "sofre-do-rim-quem-qué" (Cissus sp.), that seemed to have a stronger effect.

Another interviewee, PE1, reported that the bark and seeds of "amburana-de-cheiro"* (Amburana cf. cearensis (Allemão) A.C. Sm. - Fabaceae s.l.) were widely used for anti-inflammatory therapy in Pernambuco state but had to be replaced by "mentruz" (Chenopodium ambrosioides L.) because the former was not found in Diadema. In addition, SE1 had to replace "pau-de-sapo"* (Pouteria cf. melinoniana Boehni - Sapotaceae), whose leaves were used for chronic wounds, with "carrapicho" (Acanthospermum australe (Loefl.) Kuntze).

The vernacular names of some plants are registered trademarks of allopathic medicines and active ingredients, e.g., Novalgina® (Achillea millefolium) and Vick® (Eucalyptus globulus) for sinusitis, and Anador® (Alternanthera sp.), which is used as a sedative and for general pain. Contact between migrants and allopathic medicine thus led to the 'baptisms' of these plants, following the observation that both, the commercially available products and herbal source have similar effects, as reported by Pires [43].

Discontinued use

According to MG1, the following plants used in his homeland fell into disuse because they were not found in Diadema, although he tried to acquire them from local commercial sources: "quina"* (Strychnos cf. pseudoquina A. St. Hil - Loganiaceae), whose root is used to combat pain in the stomach and intestine; bark oil of "jatobá"* (Hymenaea cf. courbaril L. - Fabaceae s.l.), used for combat wounds; "batata-de-purga"* (Operculina cf. macrocarpa (L.) Urb - Convolvulaceae), whose tuber is ingested as a purgative and to clean the blood; bark and leaf of "jalapa"* (Mirabilis cf jalapa L. - Nyctaginaceae), used to clean the blood; tea of "junco"* (Cyperus cf. esculentus L. - Cyperaceae), whose root is used for inflammation; bark or seed of "emburana"* (Amburana cf. cearensis - Fabaceae s.l.), used for migraine and sleeping; and bark of "angico"* (Anadenanthera cf. colubrina (Vell.) Brenan - Fabaceae s.l.), prepared as a tea for pain in the body and fever. These plants were not described in Table 2, since they could not be collected and identified as well.

Plants used for therapeutic purposes

Of the 78 plants, 10 carry some restrictions, as they can be toxic depending on the dose, route or part utilised (Table 2). The uses described in Table 2 are written just as they were reported by the interviewees. The 68 plants used exclusively for medicinal purposes were cited for 41 complaints, which were grouped into 12 functional categories according to bodily system, as detailed in Table 3. Thus, gastrointestinal disturbances include the following complaints (numbers of medicinal plants reported): endoparasitosis (1), ulcer (1), diarrhoea (1), bellyache (2), heartburn (1), intestinal infections (1), liver pain (3). This category also includes plants used to improve digestion (1), to treat tables of haemorrhoid (1), as laxatives (10) and to purify the stomach (2), comprising a total of 24 plants employed in 44 formulas.
Table 3

The 12 categories of use comprising the 41 complaints, their total and partial number of plants cited by the five migrants.

Category of use

Complaints (number of plants cited)

Total number of plants

1- Gastrointestinal disturbances

To combat worms (1), ulcer (1), diarrhoea (1), bellyache (2), heartburn (1), intestinal infections (1), liver pain (3), to improve digestion (1), hemorrhoid (1), as laxative (10) and for stomach purify (2)

24

2- Inflammatory processes

As anti-inflammatory (3) and healing (6), to treat sty/conjunctivitis (2), inflammation in the mouth/throat (3), rheumatism (2), sinusitis (2) and gingivitis (1)

19

3- Respiratory problems

To combat cough (1), bronchitis (15) and as expectorant (2)

18

4- Anxiolytic/hypnotics

As sedative (11)

11

5-O steomuscular problems

To ease back pain (1), muscles pain (6), hip pain (1), prevent osteoporosis (1) and to treat lesions in bone (1)

10

6- Dermatological problems

To combat external allergies (2), wounds in the body (5) and inhibits the growth of skin stains (1)

8

7- Genitourinary disturbances

As diuretic (5), to combat kidney stone (2) and treating urine with blood (1)

8

8- Endocrine system

To reduce cholesterol (1) and diabetes (3)

4

9- Cardiovascular problems

Treat heart problems (1) and as blood purifier (2)

3

10- Immunological problems

To combat breast cancer (1) and stomach cancer (1)

2

11- Analgesics

Earache (2)

2

12- Fever

To combat fever (1)

1

Total

 

110*

* Some plants have been cited for more than one complaint, so the total number of plants above (110) is higher than the ones indicated by the interviewees.

The most relevant categories of use, measured by number of species employed, were gastrointestinal disturbances (30.8% of plants), inflammatory processes (24.4%) and respiratory problems (23.1%). As seen in Table 4, the group of illnesses representing immunological problems obtained the highest informant consensus factor value (Fic = 0.66), while the other categories presented Fic values lower than 0.5. These low values reflect the diversity of knowledge displayed by migrants, which can probably be attributed to different cultural influences during their migrations through Brazilian territory. Furthermore, the small number of interviewees may have resulted in low values of Fic.
Table 4

Values of Informant consensus factor (Fic) for each category of use, considering the plants cited by the five Diadema's migrants.

SN

Category of use

Plant specimen

% All Species

Use citation

% All use citation

Fic

1

Gastrointestinal disturbances

24

30.77

44

25.29

0.46

2

Inflammatory processes

19

24.36

28

16.09

0.33

3

Respiratory problems

18

23.07

31

17.82

0.43

4

Anxiolytic/hypnotics

11

14.10

19

10.92

0.44

5

Osteomuscular problems

10

12.82

13

7.47

0.25

6

Dermatological problems

8

10.26

11

6.32

0.3

7

Genitourinary disturbances

8

10.26

13

7.47

0.41

8

Endocrine system

4

5.13

5

2.87

0.25

9

Immunological problems

2

2.56

4

2.30

0.66

10

Cardiovascular problems

3

3.84

3

1.72

0

11

Analgesics

2

2.56

2

1.15

0

12

Fever

1

1.28

1

0.57

0

The parts of the plants most often used in the formulas were leaves (45.4%) and other aerial parts (22.7%). The most common formula was the infusion (37.8%), followed by in natura (17.6%) and syrup (10.1%). The most cited route of administration was ingestion (51.3%), followed by inhalation (8.4%) and topical (3.4%).

Plants with restrictions on use and/or toxic

Among the 10 specimens with restrictions on use, 6 were designated as only toxic: "alamanda-amarela" (Allamanda cathartica), "algodão-do-mato" (Asclepias curassavica L.), "amendoim-bravo/burra-leiteira" (Euphorbia heterophylla L.), "azaléa" (Rhododendron simsii), "comigo-ninguém-pode" (Dieffenbachia sp.) and "impatiens" (Impatiens hawkeri). The interviewees explained that depending on the dose, the latex of "alamanda-amarela" and "amendoim-bravo" can cause discomfort or even blindness. According to Oliveira et al. [44], the leaves of Dieffenbachia picta Schott contain calcium oxalate, which damages the oral mucosa and provokes pain and oedema, while the leaves of Allamanda cathartica contain cardiotonic glycosides and induce intense gastrointestinal disturbances.

Although reported as toxic, the latex of two other plants can be used at low doses to treat breast and stomach cancer: "avelóz" (Euphorbia tirucalli L.) and "jarnaúba" (Synadenium grantii Hook. F.), respectively. The sap of "embaúba" (Cecropia pachystachya Tréc.) was indicated as toxic, but its fruits are used to combat bronchitis. Finally, the seeds of "pucunã" (Fevillea passiflora Vell.) are toxic, being indicated as abortive. In a recent study, Rodrigues [45] also described plants with restrictions of use as reported by three Brazilian cultures: the Krahô Indians use two plants as abortives in a single prescription: "aprytytti" (Acosmium dasycarpum (Vogel) Yakovlev) and "ahkryt" (Anacardium occidentale L.) (Anacardiaceae); their barks are boiled, and the beverage is ingested in at dawn. It is an extremely bitter beverage, rich in tannin and therefore extremely astringent.

Pharmacological data

As can be seen in Table 2, 57 species (73.1%) were featured in previous pharmacological studies. For 30 of these species (52.6%), the uses cited by the migrants showed some similarity to the investigated effects/actions, demonstrating concordance between popular knowledge and academic science (marked with an asterisk in Table 2).
Table 5

The 6 categories of use comprising the 9 complaints, their respective number of animals mentioned by the migrant PE2.

Category of use

Complaints (number of animals)

1-Respiratory problems

bronchitis (7), asthma (4)

2-Central nervous system

epilepsy (1)

3-Inflammatory processes

rheumatism (1)

4-Dermatological problems

wounds in the body (1), skin cancer (1)

5-Analgesics

back pain (1)

6-Cardiovascular problems

treat heart problems (1), hemorrhage (1)

Total

18*

* some animals have been cited for more than one complaint, so their total number above (18) is higher than the number of animals indicated: 12.

Animals used for therapeutic purposes and dynamics of use

From the five interviewees, only one (PE2) offered knowledge on the medicinal uses of 12 animals. They belong to four taxonomic classes: Reptilia (6 species), Insects (3), Mammalia (2) and Amphibia (1). However, the interviewee has used only two animals since he arrived in Diadema, the other ten animals fell into disuse because they are not available in this city. The two animals were collected, identified and deposited in the Museum of Zoology-USP: ant (Atta sexdens L.) and cockroach (Periplaneta americana L.). These species belong to the maintenance of use category (highlighted with □ in Table 1). The other ten species therefore belong to the discontinued use category (highlighted with Ο in Table 1) which could not be collected. Their identifications were made by PE2 through consulting images from books (as described in Methodology). For three animals (snake, alligator and giant water bug) PE2 could only hesitantly confirm their identity, probably due to the great diversity of these animals in Brazil. Therefore, they are denoted in Table 1 as probably belonging to one of three possible genera.

The animals were used in 14 different medicinal formulas, with the skin most commonly used (33.3%), followed by whole animal (20.0%), bone (13.4%), fat (6.7%), rattle (6.7%), tooth (6.7%), anthill (6.7%) and turtleshell (6.7%). Some studies conducted in Brazil show that concomitant data corroborate and sustain these uses [46–50]. The formulas were cited for the treatment of nine complaints, which were grouped into six functional categories, as shown in Table 5. The most commonly cited formula was powder (66.7%), followed by in natura (20%). The most frequent route of administration was ingestion (78.6%).

The most common complaint involved respiratory problems (58.4%; 7 animals) followed by central nervous system (8.3%), inflammatory processes (8.3%), dermatological problems (8.3%), analgesics (8.3%), cardiovascular problems (8.3%) as shown in Table 5. The high humidity of the region (with annual rainfall between 1.000 and 1750 mm) [21] is known to lead to bronchitis, cough and asthma. This may explain why so many plants and animals were used to treat respiratory disturbances in Diadema, which has been shown in studies of the Sistema Único de Saúde [51] to be the second largest cause of death in Diadema - 14,4%.

Many animals have been used for medical purposes since antiquity [52–55]. Despite the existence of several ethnopharmacological studies suggesting the bioactive potential of Brazilian fauna [37, 56–61], only marine animals have been investigated by chemical and pharmacological methods [62–64]. No pharmacological data was found in the literature for the five animals identified in the present study: rattlesnake (Crotalus cf. durissus L.), capybara (Hydrochoerus cf. hydrochaeris L.), iguana (Iguana cf. iguana L.), ant (Atta sexdens) and cockroach (Periplaneta americana). The lack of information available on medicinal animal products leads us to conclude that this is a largely unexplored topic in Brazil and that future pharmacological studies should confirm the potential therapeutic value of these species.

Conclusion

The migrant interviewees demonstrated knowledge about the medicinal and toxic properties of plants and animals available in the Atlantic Forest remnants of the municipality of Diadema. Migration contributed to the expansion of knowledge regarding the use of natural resources, especially through the processes of resource replacement and/or incorporation. Moreover, the maintenance of original uses of certain resources demonstrates their value in the migrants' therapeutic practices.

The seven plants [Impatiens hawkeri W. Bull., Artemisia canphorata Vill., Equisetum arvensis L., Senna pendula (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby, Zea mays L., Fevillea passiflora Vell. and Croton fuscescens Spreng)] and the two animals (Atta sexdens and Periplaneta americana) that showed maintenance of use among migrants during their displacement in Brazilian territory, have not been studied by pharmacologists yet. These species should be highlighted in further investigations because the maintenance of use during human migrations can be indicative of bioactive potential.

This work also demonstrates the impossibility of sharing benefits related to property rights with cultures under certain circumstances, as the dynamic use of natural resources presents particularly varied influences. The interviewed migrants had passed through several Brazilian cities and were exposed to distinct vegetation and cultures. In this migration, they have passed on and incorporated knowledge in an intensive exchange where formulas and uses are mixed and re-invented as a result of contact between cultures.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the interviewees for their hospitality, help, and mainly for providing us with information for the purpose of this study. We are grateful to Julino Assunção Rodrigues Soares Neto, Valéria Basti, Maria Conceição D.A. Fernandes. We also appreciate the help of FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo), FIC (Faculdade Integral Cantareira) and AFIP (Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Psicofarmacologia), Herbário Municipal de São Paulo (PMSP), which provided financial support which made this research possible. Finally, we thank Dr. Lúcia Rossi and Prof. Dr. Hussam El Dine Zaher, for conducting the botanical and animal identification, respectively.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Arthur Ridel, 275 CEP, 09941-510 Diadema, S.P., Brazil
(2)
Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 862 - 1º andar - Edifício Biomédicas, CEP 04023-062 São Paulo, S.P., Brazil

References

  1. Pieroni A, Vandebroek I: Traveling cultures and plants: the ethnobiology and ethnopharmacy of human migrations. 2007, Berghahn Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Pieroni A, Quave CL: Traditional pharmacopoeias and medicines among Albanians and Italians in southern Italy: a comparison. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 101: 258-270. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Waldstein A: Mexican migrant ethnopharmacology: pharmacopoeia, classification of medicines and explanations of efficacy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108: 299-310. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.07.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Waldstein A: "Diaspora and Health? Traditional Medicine and Culture in a Mexican Migrant Community". Int Migr. 2008, 46: 95-117. 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00490.x.Google Scholar
  5. Volpato G, Godínez D, Beyra A, Barreto : A Uses of medicinal plants by Haitian immigrants and their descendants in the Province of Camagüey, Cuba. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 16-10.1186/1746-4269-5-16.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Voeks RA: Traditions in transition: African diaspora ethnobotany in lowland South America. Mobility and Migration in Indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary Ethnoecological Perspectives. Edited by: Alexiades M. 2009, London: Berghahn, 275-294.Google Scholar
  7. Carney J, Voeks RA: Landscape legades of the African Diaspora in Brazil. Prog Hum Geogr. 2003, 27: 6-10.1191/0309132503ph418oa.Google Scholar
  8. Ceuterick M, Vandebroek I, Torry B, Pieroni A: Cross-cultural adaptation in urban ethnobotany: the Colombian folk pharmacopoeia in London. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 120: 342-359. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.09.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. van Andel, P Westers: Why Surinamese migrants in the Netherlands continue to use medicinal herbs from their home country. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127: 694-701. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.11.033.Google Scholar
  10. Pieroni A, Nebel C, Quave CL, Münz H, Heinrich M: Ethnopharmacology of liakra, traditional weedy vegetables of the Arbëreshë of the Vulture area in southern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 81: 165-185. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00052-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pieroni A, Quave CL, Nebel S, Heinrich M: Ethnopharmacy of ethnic Albanians (Arbëreshë) in northern Basilicata (southern Italy). Fitoterapia. 2002, 73: 217-241. 10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00063-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pieroni A, Quave CL, Villanelli ML, Mangino P, Sabbatini G, Santini L: Ethnopharmacognostic survey on the natural ingredients used in folk cosmetics, cosmeceuticals and remedies for healing skin diseases in the inland Marches, Central-Eastern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 91: 331-344. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.01.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cano JH, Volpato G: Herbal mixtures in the traditional medicine of Eastern Cuba. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 90: 293-316. 10.1016/j.jep.2003.10.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodrigues E, Mendes FR, Negri G: Plants indicated by Brazilian Indians to Central Nervous System disturbances: a bibliographical approach. Curr Med Chem. 2005, 6: 211-244.Google Scholar
  15. IBGE. [http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/]
  16. Instituto Socioambiental. [http://www.socioambiental.org/]
  17. Fundação Cultural Palmares. [http://palmares.gov.br/]
  18. Giulietti AM, Harley RM, Queiroz LP, Wanderley MGL, Van den Berg C: Biodiversidade e conservação das plantas no Brasil. Megadiversidade. 2005, 1: 52-61.Google Scholar
  19. Marques AC, Lamas CJE: Taxonomia zoológica no Brasil: estado da arte, expectativas e sugestões de ações futuras. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 2005, 46: 139-174.Google Scholar
  20. Simões LL, Lino CF: Sustentável Mata Atlântica: a exploração de seus recursos florestais. 2004, SENAC: São PauloGoogle Scholar
  21. IBAMA. [http://ibama.gov.br/ecossistemas/mata_atlantica.htm]
  22. Prefeitura de Diadema. [http://www.diadema.sp.gov.br/apache2-default/]
  23. Atlas de Desenvolvimento Humano/PNUD. [http://www.pnud.org.br/atlas/]
  24. Bernard RH: Research methods in cultural anthropology. 1988, Sage publications: LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipp FJ: Methods for ethnopharmacological field work. J Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 25: 139-150. 10.1016/0378-8741(89)90015-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Freitas MA, Silva TFS: A herpetofauna da Mata Atlântica nordestina. 2005, USEB: PelotasGoogle Scholar
  27. Freitas MA, Silva TFS: A herpetofauna das caatingas e áreas de altitudes do nordeste Brasileiro. 2007, USEB: PelotasGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenzi H, Matos FJ, de A: Plantas medicinais do Brasil: nativas e exóticas cultivadas. 2008, Instituto Plantarum: São PauloGoogle Scholar
  29. PUBMED. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed]
  30. SCIFINDER. [http://www.cas.org/products/sfacad/index.html]
  31. Pio Corrêa M: Dicionário das plantas úteis do Brasil e das exóticas cultivadas. 1926, Imprensa Nacional: Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  32. Trotter RT, Logan MH: Informant consensus: a new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. Plants in indigenous medicine and diet: biobehavioral approachs. Edited by: Etkin NL. 1986, New York: Redgrave Publishing, 91-112.Google Scholar
  33. Heinrich M: Ethnobotany and its role in drug development. Phytother Res. 2000, 14: 479-488. 10.1002/1099-1573(200011)14:7<479::AID-PTR958>3.0.CO;2-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Di Stasi LC, Oliveira GP, Carvalhares MA, Queiroz-Junior M, Tien OS, Kakinami SH, Reis MS: Medicinal plants popularly used in the Brazilian Tropical Atlantic Forest. Fitoterapia. 2002, 73: 69-91. 10.1016/S0367-326X(01)00362-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Almeida C, Albuquerque UP: Uso e conservação de plantas e animais medicinais no estado de Pernambuco (nordeste do Brasil): um estudo de caso. Interciencia. 2002, 27: 276-285.Google Scholar
  36. Begossi A, Leitão-Filho HF, Richerson PJ: Plant uses a Brazilian coastal fishing community (Búzios Island). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 1993, 13: 233-256.Google Scholar
  37. Rodrigues E: Ethnopharmacology in the Jaú National Park (JNP), state of Amazonas, Brazil. Phytother Res. 2006, 5: 378-391. 10.1002/ptr.1866.Google Scholar
  38. Rodrigues E, Carlini EA: Plants used by a Quilombola group in Brazil with potential central nervous system effects. Phytother Res. 2004, 18: 748-753. 10.1002/ptr.1535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues E, Carlini EA: Ritual use of plants with possible action on the central nervous system by the Kraho indians, Brazil. Phytother Res. 2005, 19: 129-135. 10.1002/ptr.1636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Díaz JL: Ethnopharmacology of sacred psychoactive plants used by the Indians of Mexico. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1977, 17: 647-675. 10.1146/annurev.pa.17.040177.003243.Google Scholar
  41. Woodland DW: Contemporary plant systematics. 1997, Andrews University Press: LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Schultes RE, Raffaulf RF: The Healing Forest. Medicinal and Toxic Plants of the Nortwest Amazonia. 1990, Dioscorides Press: Oregon, 2:Google Scholar
  43. Pires JM, Mendes FR, Negri G, Duarte-Almeida JM, Carlini EA: Antinociceptive peripheral effect of Achillea millefolium L. and Artemisia vulgaris L.: Both plants known popularly by Brand Names of analgesic drugs. Phytother Res. 2009, 23: 212-219. 10.1002/ptr.2589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliveira RB, Godoy SAP, Costa FB: Plantas Tóxicas: Conhecimento e prevenção de acidentes. 2003, Holos: São PauloGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodrigues E: Plants of restricted use indicated by three cultures in Brazil (caboclo-river dweller, Indian and Quilombola). J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111: 295-302. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Costa-Neto EM: Animal-based medicines: biological prospection and the sustainable use of zootherapeutic resources. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences. 2005, 77: 33-43.Google Scholar
  47. Santos-Fita D, Costa-Neto EM: As interações entre os seres humanos e os animais: a contribuição da etnozoologia. Biotemas. 2007, 20 (4): 99-110.Google Scholar
  48. Ferreira FS, Brito SV, Ribeiro SC, Saraiva AAF, Almeida WO, Alves RRN: Animal-based folk remedies sold in public markets in Crato and Juazeiro do Norte, Ceará, Brazil. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2009, 9: 17-10.1186/1472-6882-9-17.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Alves RRN: Fauna used in popular medicine in Northeast Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 1-10.1186/1746-4269-5-1.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Torres DF, de Oliveira ES, Alves RRN, Vasconcellos A: Etnobotânica e etnozoologia em unidades de conservação: uso da biodiversidade na APA de Genipabu, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Interciencia. 2009, 34: 623-629.Google Scholar
  51. Sistema Único de Saúde. [http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/tabdata/cadernos/cadernosmap.htm]
  52. Gudger EW: Stitching wounds with the mandibles of ants and beetles. J Am Med Assoc. 1925, 84: 1861-1864.Google Scholar
  53. Weiss HB: Entomological medicaments of the past. Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 1947, 55: 155-168.Google Scholar
  54. Conconi JR, Pino JM: The utilization of insects in the empirical medicine of ancient Mexicans. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 1988, 8: 195-202.Google Scholar
  55. Antonio TMF, (Eds): Insects as remedies for illnesses in Zaire. The Food Insects Newsletter. 1994, 7: 4-5.Google Scholar
  56. Costa-Neto EM: The use of insects in folk medicine in the state of Bahia, northeastern Brazil, with notes on insects reported elsewhere in Brazilian folk medicine. Hum Ecol. 2002, 30: 245-263. 10.1023/A:1015696830997.Google Scholar
  57. Alves RRN, Rosa IL: Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines?. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2005, 30: 1-5.Google Scholar
  58. Alves RRN, Delima YCC: Snakes used in ethnomedicine in northeast Brazil environment, development and sustainability. CAB Abstr Lite. 2006, 9: 455-464.Google Scholar
  59. Costa-Neto EM: Os moluscos na zooterapia: medicina tradicional e importância clínico-farmacológica. Biotemas. 2006, 19: 71-78.Google Scholar
  60. Hanazaki N, Alves RRN, Begossi A: Hunting and use of terrestrial fauna used by Caiçaras from the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009, 5: 36-10.1186/1746-4269-5-36.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Alves RRN, Dias TLP: Usos de invertebrados na medicina popular no Brasil e suas implicações para conservação. Tropical Conservation Science. 2010, 2: 159-174.Google Scholar
  62. Berlink RGS, Hajdu E, Rocha RM, Oliveira JHLL, Hernandez ILC, Seleghim MHR, Granato AC, Almeida EVR, Nunnez CV, Muricy G, Peixinho S, Pessoa C, Moraes MO, Cavalcanti BC, Nascimento GGF, Thiemann OH, Silva M: Challenges and Rewards of Research in Marine Natural Products Chemistry in Brazil. J Nat Prod. 2004, 67: 510-522. 10.1021/np0304316.Google Scholar
  63. Gray CA, Lira SP, Silva M, Pimenta EF, Thiemann OH, Oliva AG, Hajdu E, Andersen RJ, Berlink RGS: Sulfated Meroterpenoids from the Brazilian Sponge Callyspongia sp. are Inhibitors of the Antileishmaniasis Target Adenosine Phosphoribosyl Transferase. J Org Chem. 2006, 71: 8685-8690. 10.1021/jo060295k.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kossuga MH, Lira SP, Mchugh S, Torres YR, Lima BA, Veloso K, Ferreira Antonio G, Rocha RM, Berlink RGS: Antibacterial Modified Diketopiperazines from two Ascidians of the Genus Didemnum. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009, 20: 704-711. 10.1590/S0103-50532009000400014.Google Scholar
  65. Nayak S, Nalabothu P, Sandiford S, Bhogadi V, Adogwa A: Evaluation of wound healing activity of Allamanda cathartica. L. and Laurus nobilis. L. extracts on rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006, 12: 138-142.Google Scholar
  66. Fu Y, Zu Y, Chen L, Efferth T, Liang H, Liu Z, Liu W: Investigation of antibacterial activity of rosemary essential oil against Propionibacterium acnes with atomic force microscopy. Planta Med. 2007, 73: 1275-1280. 10.1055/s-2007-981614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Weckesser S, Engel K, Simon-Haarhaus B, Wittmer A, Pelz K, Schempp CM: Screening of plant extracts for antimicrobial activity against bacteria and yeasts with dermatological relevance. Phytomedicine. 2007, 14: 508-516. 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.12.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Peng CH, Su JD, Chyau CC, Sung TY, Ho SS, Peng CC, Peng RY: Supercritical fluid extracts of rosemary leaves exhibit potent anti-inflammation and anti-tumor effects. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007, 71: 2223-2232. 10.1271/bbb.70199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Nusier MK, Bataineh HN, Daradkah HM: Adverse effects of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) on reproductive function in adult male rats. Exp Biol Med. 2007, 232: 809-813.Google Scholar
  70. González-Trujano ME, Peña EI, Martínez AL, Moreno J, Guevara-Fefer P, Déciga-Campos M, López-Muñoz FJ: Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of Rosmarinus officinalis L. using three different experimental models in rodents. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 22: 476-482. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.12.011.Google Scholar
  71. Gillij YG, Gleiser RM, Zygadlo JA: Mosquito repellent activity of essential oils of aromatic plants growing in Argentina. Bioresour Technol. 2008, 99: 2507-2415. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.066.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Bakirel T, Bakirel U, Keles OU, Ulgen SG, Yardibi H: In vivo assessment of antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) in alloxan-diabetic rabbits. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 28: 64-73. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.10.039.Google Scholar
  73. Orsi RO, Sforcin JM, Funari SR, Bankova V: Effects of Brazilian and Bulgarian propolis on bactericidal activity of macrophages against Salmonella typhimurium. Int Immunopharmacol. 2005, 5: 359-368. 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.10.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Fukuda M, Ohkoshi E, Makino M, Fujimoto Y: Studies on the constituents of the leaves of Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae) and their cytotoxic activity. Chem Pharm Bull. 2006, 54: 1465-1468. 10.1248/cpb.54.1465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Klopell FC, Lemos M, Sousa JP, Comunello E, Maistro EL, Bastos JK, de Andrade SF: Nerolidol, an antiulcer constituent from the essential oil of Baccharis dracunculifolia DC (Asteraceae). Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2007, 62: 537-542.Google Scholar
  76. Da Silva Filho AA, de Sousa JP, Soares S, Furtado NA, Andrade e Silva ML, Cunha WR, Gregório LE, Nanayakkara NP, Bastos JK: Antimicrobial activity of the extract and isolated compounds from Baccharis dracunculifolia D. C. (Asteraceae). Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2008, 63: 40-46.Google Scholar
  77. Paulino N, Abreu SR, Uto Y, Koyama D, Nagasawa H, Hori H, Dirsch VM, Vollmar AM, Scremin A, Bretz WA: Anti-inflammatory effects of a bioavailable compound, Artepillin C, in Brazilian propolis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008, 10: 296-301. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.02.067.Google Scholar
  78. Padilha de Paula J, Gomes-Carneiro MR, Paumgartten FJ: Chemical composition, toxicity and mosquito repellency of Ocimum selloi oil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 88: 253-260. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00233-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kupchan SM, Knox JR, Kelsey JE, Saenzrenauld JA: Calotropin, a cytotoxic principle isolated from Asclepias curassavica L. Science. 1964, 25: 1685-1686. 10.1126/science.146.3652.1685.Google Scholar
  80. Radford DJ, Gillies AD, Hinds JA, Duffy P: Naturally occurring cardiac glycosides. Med J Aust. 1986, 12: 540-544.Google Scholar
  81. De Almeida Barbosa LC, de Alvarenga ES, Demuner AJ, Virtuoso LS, Silva AA: Synthesis of new phytogrowth-inhibitory substituted aryl-p-benzoquinones. Chem Biodivers. 2006, 3: 553-567. 10.1002/cbdv.200690059.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Souza MC, Siani AC, Ramos MF, Menezes-de-Lima OJ, Henriques MG: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of essential oils from two Asteraceae species. Pharmazie. 2004, 58: 582-586.Google Scholar
  83. Schmourlo G, Mendonça-Filho RR, Alviano CS, Costa SS: Screening of antifungal agents using ethanol precipitation and bioautography of medicinal and food plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 15: 563-568. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.007.Google Scholar
  84. De Lima MR, de Souza Luna J, dos Santos AF, de Andrade MC, Sant'Ana AE, Genet JP, Marquez B, Neuville L, Moreau N: Anti-bacterial activity of some Brazilian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 21: 137-147. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.10.026.Google Scholar
  85. Gandhi M, Lal R, Sankaranarayanan A, Sharma PL: Post-coital antifertility action of Ruta graveolens in female rats and hamsters. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 34: 49-59. 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90188-J.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Oliva A, Meepagala KM, Wedge DE, Harries D, Hale AL, Aliotta G, Duke SO: Natural fungicides from Ruta graveolens L. leaves, including a new quinolone alkaloid. J Agri Food Chem. 2003, 12: 890-896. 10.1021/jf0259361.Google Scholar
  87. Ivanova A, Mikhova B, Najdenski H, Tsvetkova I, Kostova I: Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of Ruta graveolens. Fitoterapia. 2005, 3: 344-347. 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.02.008.Google Scholar
  88. De Freitas TG, Augusto PM, Montanari T: Effect of Ruta graveolens L. on pregnant mice. Contraception. 2005, 71: 74-77. 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.07.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Preethi KC, Kuttan G, Kuttan R: Anti-tumour activity of Ruta graveolens extract. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006, 7: 439-443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Raghav SK, Gupta B, Agrawal C, Goswami K, Das HR: Anti-inflammatory effect of Ruta graveolens L. in murine macrophage cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 8: 234-239. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.008.Google Scholar
  91. Khori V, Nayebpour M, Semnani S, Golalipour MJ, Marjani A: Prolongation of AV nodal refractoriness by Ruta graveolens in isolated rat hearts. Potential role as an anti-arrhythmic agent. Saudi Med J. 2008, 29: 357-363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Nogueira JC, Diniz Mde F, Lima EO: In vitro antimicrobial activity of plants in Acute Otitis Externa. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 74: 118-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Valadares MC, Carrucha SG, Accorsi W, Queiroz ML: Euphorbia tirucalli L. modulates myelopoiesis and enhances the resistance of tumour-bearing mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006, 6: 294-299. 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.07.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Shlamovitz GZ, Gupta M, Diaz JA: A case of acute keratoconjunctivitis from exposure to latex of Euphorbia tirucalli (Pencil Cactus). J Emerg Med. 2007, 36: 239-241. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.03.034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Bani S, Kaul A, Khan B, Gupta VK, Satti NK, Suri KA, Qazi GN: Anti-arthritic activity of a biopolymeric fraction from Euphorbia tirucalli. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 1: 92-98. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.09.021.Google Scholar
  96. Takahashi H, Hirata S, Minami H, Fukuyama Y: Triterpene and flavanone glycoside from Rhododendron simsii. Phytochemistry. 2001, 56: 875-879. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00493-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Frutuoso VS, Gurjão MR, Cordeiro RS, Martins MA: Analgesic and anti-ulcerogenic effects of a polar extract from leaves of Vernonia condensata. Planta Med. 1994, 60: 21-25. 10.1055/s-2006-959400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Valverde AL, Cardoso GL, Pereira NA, Silva AJ, Kuster RM: Analgesic and antiinflammatory activities of vernonioside B2 from Vernonia condensata. Phytother Res. 2001, 15: 263-264. 10.1002/ptr.733.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. De Moura RS, Emiliano AF, de Carvalho LC, Souza MA, Guedes DC, Tano T, Resende AC: Antihypertensive and endothelium-dependent vasodilator effects of Alpinia zerumbet, a medicinal plant. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005, 46: 288-294. 10.1097/01.fjc.0000175239.26326.47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. De Araújo PF, Coelho-de-Souza AN, Morais SM, Ferreira SC, Leal-Cardoso JH: Antinociceptive effects of the essential oil of Alpinia zerumbet on mice. Phytomedicine. 2005, 12: 482-486. 10.1016/j.phymed.2004.04.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Sawangjaroen N, Phongpaichit S, Subhadhirasakul S, Visutthi M, Srisuwan N, Thammapalerd N: The anti-amoebic activity of some medicinal plants used by AIDS patients in southern Thailand. Parasitol Res. 2006, 98: 588-592. 10.1007/s00436-005-0119-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Lin LY, Peng CC, Yeh WT, Wang HE, Yu TH, Peng RY: Alpinia zerumbet potentially elevates high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in hamsters. J Agric Food Chem. 2008, 25: 4435-4443. 10.1021/jf800195d.Google Scholar
  103. Berson DS: Natural antioxidants. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008, 7: 7-12.Google Scholar
  104. Araújo VT, Diogo DC, da Silva MAP, Riggio LMT, Lapa AJ, Souccar C: Evaluation of the antiurolithiatic activity of the extract of Costus spiralis Roscoe in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 66: 193-198. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00171-8.Google Scholar
  105. Palmieri MMB: Efeitos sobre o Sistema Nervoso Central de extratos de plantas popularmente citadas como anticonvulsivantes. MsD thesis. 2000, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ribeirão PretoGoogle Scholar
  106. Cavalcanti ES, Morais SM, Lima MA, Santana EW: Larvicidal activity of essential oils from Brazilian plants against Aedes aegypti L. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004, 99: 541-544. 10.1590/S0074-02762004000500015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wannissorn B, Jarikasem S, Siriwangchai T, Thubthimthed S: Antibacterial properties of essential oils from Thai medicinal plants. Fitoterapia. 2005, 76: 233-236. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.12.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Tchoumbougnang F, Zollo PH, Dagne E, Mekonnen Y: In vivo antimalarial activity of essential oils from Cymbopogon citratus and Ocimum gratissimum on mice infected with Plasmodium berghei. Planta Med. 2005, 7: 20-23. 10.1055/s-2005-837745.Google Scholar
  109. Moore SJ, Hill N, Ruiz C, Cameron MM: Field evaluation of traditionally used plant-based insect repellents and fumigants against the malaria vector Anopheles darlingi in Riberalta, Bolivian Amazon. J Med Entomol. 2007, 44: 624-630. 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[624:FEOTUP]2.0.CO;2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Adeneye AA, Agbaje EO: Hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects of fresh leaf aqueous extract of Cymbopogon citratus Stapf. in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 25: 440-444. 10.1016/j.jep.2007.03.034.Google Scholar
  111. Pintão AM, Pais MS, Coley H, Kelland LR, Judson IR: In vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of benzyl isothiocyanate: a natural product from Tropaeolum majus. Planta Med. 1995, 61: 233-236. 10.1055/s-2006-958062.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Soicke H, Leng-Peschlow E: Characterisation of flavonoids from Baccharis trimera and their antihepatotoxic properties. Planta Med. 1987, 53: 37-39. 10.1055/s-2006-962613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Gené RM, Cartaña C, Adzet T, Marín E, Parella T, Cañigueral S: Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of Baccharis trimera: identification of its active constituents. Planta Med. 1996, 62: 232-235. 10.1055/s-2006-957866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Torres LM, Gamberini MT, Roque NF, Lima-Landman MT, Souccar C, Lapa AJ: Diterpene from Baccharis trimera with a relaxant effect on rat vascular smooth muscle. Phytochemistry. 2000, 55: 617-619. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00223-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Januário AH, Santos SL, Marcussi S, Mazzi MV, Pietro RC, Sato DN, Ellena J, Sampaio SV, França SC, Soares AM: Neo-clerodane diterpenoid, a new metalloprotease snake venom inhibitor from Baccharis trimera (Asteraceae): anti-proteolytic and anti-hemorrhagic properties. Chem Biol Interact. 2004, 7: 243-251. 10.1016/j.cbi.2004.09.016.Google Scholar
  116. Simões-Pires CA, Queiroz EF, Henriques AT, Hostettmann K: Isolation and on-line identification of antioxidant compounds from three Baccharis species by HPLC-UV-MS/MS with post-column derivatisation. Phytochem Anal. 2005, 16: 307-314. 10.1002/pca.826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Oliveira AC, Endringer DC, Amorim LA, das Graças L, Brandão M, Coelho MM: Effect of the extracts and fractions of Baccharis trimera and Syzygium cumini on glycaemia of diabetic and non-diabetic mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 1: 465-169. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.025.Google Scholar
  118. Dickel ML, Rates SM, Ritter MR: Plants popularly used for loosing weight purposes in Porto Alegre, South Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 3: 60-71. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.07.003.Google Scholar
  119. Carvalho LH, Krettli AU: Antimalarial chemotherapy with natural products and chemically defined molecules. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1991, 2: 181-184.Google Scholar
  120. Portillo A, Vila R, Freixa B, Adzet T, Cañigueral S: Antifungal activity of Paraguayan plants used in traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 76: 93-98. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00214-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Molina M, Contreras CM, Tellez-Alcantara P: Mimosa pudica may possess antidepressant actions in the rat. Phytomedicine. 1999, 6: 319-323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Mahanta M, Mukherjee AK: Neutralisation of lethality, myotoxicity and toxic enzymes of Naja kaouthia venom by Mimosa pudica root extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75: 55-60. 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00373-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Ngo Bum E, Dawack DL, Schmutz M, Rakotonirina A, Rakotonirina SV, Portet C, Jeker A, Olpe HR, Herrling P: Anticonvulsant activity of Mimosa pudica decoction. Fitoterapia. 2004, 75: 309-314. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.01.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Lans C: Ethnomedicines used in Trinidad and Tobago for reproductive problems. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007, 15: 3-13. 10.1186/1746-4269-3-3.Google Scholar
  125. Velázquez E, Tournier HA, Mordujovich de Buschiazzo P, Saavedra G, Schinella GR: Antioxidant activity of Paraguayan plant extracts. Fitoterapia. 2003, 74: 91-97. 10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00293-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Consolini AE, Ragone MI, Migliori GN, Conforti P, Volonté MG: Cardiotonic and sedative effects of Cecropia pachystachya Mart. (ambay) on isolated rat hearts and conscious mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 15: 90-96. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.12.006.Google Scholar
  127. Schinella G, Aquila S, Dade M, Giner R, Recio Mdel C, Spegazzini E, de Buschiazzo P, Tournier H, Ríos JL: Anti-inflammatory and apoptotic activities of pomolic acid isolated from Cecropia pachystachya. Planta Med. 2008, 74: 215-220. 10.1055/s-2008-1034301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Cáceres A, Alvarez AV, Ovando AE, Samayoa BE: Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of respiratory diseases. 1. Screening of 68 plants against gram-positive bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 31: 193-208. 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90005-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Pascual ME, Slowing K, Carretero ME, Villar A: Antiulcerogenic activity of Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Brown (Verbenaceae). Farmaco. 2001, 56: 501-504. 10.1016/S0014-827X(01)01086-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Zétola M, De Lima TC, Sonaglio D, González-Ortega G, Limberger RP, Petrovick R, Bassani VL: CNS activities of liquid and spray-dried extracts from Lippia alba-Verbenaceae (Brazilian false melissa). J Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 82: 207-215. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00187-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Andrighetti-Fröhner CR, Sincero TC, da Silva AC, Savi LA, Gaido CM, Bettega JM, Mancini M, de Almeida MT, Barbosa RA, Farias MR, Barardi CR, Simões CM: Antiviral evaluation of plants from Brazilian Atlantic Tropical Forest. Fitoterapia. 2005, 76: 374-378. 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Aridoğan BC, Baydar H, Kaya S, Demirci M, Ozbaşar D, Mumcu E: Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of some essential oils. Arch Pharm Res. 2002, 25: 860-864. 10.1007/BF02977005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Choi EM, Hwang JK: Antiinflammatory, analgesic and antioxidant activities of the fruit of Foeniculum vulgare. Fitoterapia. 2004, 75: 557-565. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.05.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Lee HS: Acaricidal activity of constituents identified in Foeniculum vulgare fruit oil against Dermatophagoides spp. (Acari: Pyroglyphidae). J Agric Food Chem. 2004, 19: 2887-2889. 10.1021/jf049631t.Google Scholar
  135. Ozcan MM, Chalchat JC, Arslan D, Ates A, Unver A: Comparative essential oil composition and antifungal effect of bitter fennel (Foeniculum vulgare ssp. piperitum) fruit oils obtained during different vegetation. J Med Food. 2006, 9: 552-561. 10.1089/jmf.2006.9.552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Tognolini M, Ballabeni V, Bertoni S, Bruni R, Impicciatore M, Barocelli E: Protective effect of Foeniculum vulgare essential oil and anethole in an experimental model of thrombosis. Pharmacol Res. 2007, 56: 254-260. 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.07.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Pitasawat B, Champakaew D, Choochote W, Jitpakdi A, Chaithong U, Kanjanapothi D, Rattanachanpichai E, Tippawangkosol P, Riyong D, Tuetun B, Chaiyasit D: Aromatic plant-derived essential oil: an alternative larvicide for mosquito control. Fitoterapia. 2007, 78: 205-210. 10.1016/j.fitote.2007.01.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Gray AM, Flatt PR: Antihyperglycemic actions of Eucalyptus globulus (Eucalyptus) are associated with pancreatic and extra-pancreatic effects in mice. J Nutr. 1998, 128: 2319-2323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Silva J, Abebeb W, Sousa SM, Duarte VG, Machado MIL, Matos FJA: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of essential oils of Eucalyptus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 89: 277-283. 10.1016/j.jep.2003.09.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Takahashi T, Kokubo R, Sakaino M: Antimicrobial activities of eucalyptus leaf extracts and flavonoids from Eucalyptus maculata. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004, 39: 60-64. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01538.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Salari MH, Amine G, Shirazi MH, Hafezi R, Mohammadypour M: Antibacterial effects of Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract on pathogenic bacteria isolated from specimens of patients with respiratory tract disorders. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006, 12: 194-196. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01284.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Zheng YY, Yang J, Chen DH, Sun L: Effects of the stilbene extracts from Cajanus cajan L. on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2007, 42: 562-565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Braga FG, Bouzada ML, Fabri RL, de O, Matos M, Moreira FO, Scio E, Coimbra ES: Antileishmanial and antifungal activity of plants used in traditional medicine in Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 4: 396-402. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.12.006.Google Scholar
  144. Luo QF, Sun L, Si JY, Chen DH, Du GH: Hypocholesterolemic effect of stilbene extract from Cajanus cajan L. on serum and hepatic lipid in diet-induced hyperlipidemic mice. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2008, 43: 145-149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Obaseiki-Ebor EE: Preliminary report on the in vitro antibacterial activity of Bryophyllum pinnatum leaf juice. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1985, 14: 199-202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Pal S, Nag Chaudhuri AK: Studies on the anti-ulcer activity of a Bryophyllum pinnatum leaf extract in experimental animals. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 33: 97-102. 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90168-D.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Akinpelu DA: Antimicrobial activity of Bryophyllum pinnatum leaves. Fitoterapia. 2000, 71: 193-194. 10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00135-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Ojewole JA: Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic effects of Bryophyllum pinnatum (Crassulaceae) leaf aqueous extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 13: 13-19. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.025.Google Scholar
  149. Yemitan OK, Salahdeen HM: Neurosedative and muscle relaxant activities of aqueous extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum. Fitoterapia. 2005, 76: 187-193. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.11.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Penido C, Costa KA, Futuro DO, Paiva SR, Kaplan MA, Figueiredo MR, Henriques MG: Anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcerogenic properties of Stachytarpheta cayennensis (L.C. Rich) Vahl. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 8: 225-233. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.09.006.Google Scholar
  151. Adebajo AC, Olawode EO, Omobuwajo OR, Adesanya SA, Begrow F, Elkhawad A, Akanmu MA, Edrada R, Proksch P, Klaes M, Verspohl EJ: Hypoglycaemic constituents of Stachytarpheta cayennensis leaf. Planta Med. 2007, 7: 3241-3250.Google Scholar
  152. Anas K, Jayasree PR, Vijayakumar T, Manish Kumar PR: In vitro antibacterial activity of Psidium guajava Linn. leaf extract on clinical isolates of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Exp Biol. 2008, 46: 41-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Cheruiyot KR, Olila D, Kateregga J: In-vitro antibacterial activity of selected medicinal plants from Longisa region of Bomet district, Kenya. Afr Health Sci. 2009, 1: 42-46.Google Scholar
  154. Rahim N, Gomes DJ, Watanabe H, Rahman SR, Chomvarin C, Endtz HP, Alam M: Antibacterial activity of Psidium guajava leaf and bark against multidrug-resistant Vibrio cholerae: implication for cholera control. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2010, 63: 271-274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Roy CK, Das AK: Comparative evaluation of different extracts of leaves of Psidium guajava Linn. for hepatoprotective activity. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2010, 23: 15-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Ruppelt BM, Pereira EF, Gonçalves LC, Pereira NA: Pharmacological screening of plants recommended by folk medicine as anti-snake venom-I. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1991, 2: 203-205.Google Scholar
  157. Soares de Moura R, Costa SS, Jansen JM, Silva CA, Lopes CS, Bernardo-Filho M, Nascimento da Silva V, Criddle DN, Portela BN, Rubenich LM, Araujo RG, Carvalho LC: Bronchodilator activity of Mikania glomerata Sprengel on human bronchi and guinea-pig trachea. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2002, 54: 249-256. 10.1211/0022357021778277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. Maiorano VA, Marcussi S, Daher MA, Oliveira CZ, Couto LB, Gomes OA, França SC, Soares AM, Pereira OS: Antiophidian properties of the aqueous extract of Mikania glomerata. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 1: 364-370. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.039.Google Scholar
  159. Islam ME, Haque ME, Mosaddik MA: Cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of Sida rhombifolia (Malvaceae) grown in Bangladesh. Phytother Res. 2003, 17: 973-975. 10.1002/ptr.1294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Dhalwal K, Deshpazde YS, Purohit AP: Evaluation of in vitro antioxidant activity of Sida rhombifolia (L.) ssp. retusa (L.). J Med Food. 2007, 10: 683-688. 10.1089/jmf.2006.129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Von Szczepanski C, Zgorzelak P, Hoyer GA: Isolation, structural analysis and synthesis of an antimicrobial substance from Petiveria alliacea L. Arzneimittelforschung. 1972, 22: 1975-1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Malpezzi EL, Davino SC, Costa LV, Freitas JC, Giesbrecht AM, Roque NF: Antimitotic action of extracts of Petiveria alliacea on sea urchin egg development. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1994, 27: 749-754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Lopes-Martins RA, Pegoraro DH, Woisky R, Penna SC, Sertié JA: The anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of a crude extract of Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae). Phytomedicine. 2002, 9: 245-248. 10.1078/0944-7113-00118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  164. Kim S, Kubec R, Musah RA: Antibacterial and antifungal activity of sulfur-containing compounds from Petiveria alliacea L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 8: 188-192. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.072.Google Scholar
  165. Okada Y, Tanaka K, Sato E, Okajima H: Antioxidant activity of the new thiosulfinate derivative, S-benzyl phenylmethanethiosulfinate, from Petiveria alliacea L. Org Biomol Chem. 2008, 21: 1097-1102. 10.1039/b715727d.Google Scholar
  166. Tiwari TN, Varma J, Dubey NK, Chansouria JP, Ali Z: Pharmacological evaluation of some bioactive plant products on albino rats. Hindustan Antibiot Bull. 1998, 40: 38-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Runnie I, Salleh MN, Mohamed S, Head RJ, Abeywardena MY: Vasorelaxation induced by common edible tropical plant extracts in isolated rat aorta and mesenteric vascular bed. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92: 311-316. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Ka MH, Choi EH, Chun HS, Lee KG: Antioxidative activity of volatile extracts isolated from Angelica tenuissimae roots, peppermint leaves, pine needles, and sweet flag leaves. J Agric Food Chem. 2005, 18: 4124-4129. 10.1021/jf047932x.Google Scholar
  169. Uawonggul N, Chaveerach A, Thammasirirak S, Arkaravichien T, Chuachan C, Daduang S: Screening of plants acting against Heterometrus laoticus scorpion venom activity on fibroblast cell lysis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 16: 201-207. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.003.Google Scholar
  170. Rajesh R, Shivaprasad HV, Gowda CD, Nataraju A, Dhananjaya BL, Vishwanath BS: Comparative study on plant latex proteases and their involvement in hemostasis: a special emphasis on clot inducing and dissolving properties. Planta Med. 2007, 73: 1061-1067. 10.1055/s-2007-981575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Antonio JM, Gracioso JS, Toma W, Lopez LC, Oliveira F, Brito AR: Antiulcerogenic activity of ethanol extract of Solanum variabile (false "jurubeba"). J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93: 83-88. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.03.031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Das NG, Baruah I, Talukdar PK, Das SC: Evaluation of botanicals as repellents against mosquitoes. J Vector Borne Dis. 2003, 40: 49-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. Chiasson H, Bélanger A, Bostanian N, Vincent C, Poliquin A: Acaricidal properties of Artemisia absinthium and Tanacetum vulgare (Asteraceae) essential oils obtained by three methods of extraction. J Econ Entomol. 2001, 94: 167-171. 10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Kordali S, Kotan R, Mavi A, Cakir A, Ala A, Yildirim A: Determination of the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the essential oil of Artemisia dracunculus and of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of Turkish Artemisia absinthium, A. dracunculus, A. santonicum, and A. spicigera essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2005, 30: 9452-9458. 10.1021/jf0516538.Google Scholar
  175. Lopes-Lutz D, Alviano DS, Alviano CS, Kolodziejczyk PP: Screening of chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia essential oils. Phytochemistry. 2008, 69: 1732-1738. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.02.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  176. Rao YK, Fang SH, Tzeng YM: Inhibitory effects of the flavonoids isolated from Waltheria indica on the production of NO, TNF-alpha and IL-12 in activated macrophages. Bio Pharm Bull. 2005, 28: 912-915. 10.1248/bpb.28.912.Google Scholar
  177. Talbourdet S, Sadick NS, Lazou K, Bonnet-Duquennoy M, Kurfurst R, Neveu M, Heusèle C, André P, Schnebert S, Draelos ZD, Perrier E: Modulation of gene expression as a new skin anti-aging strategy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007, 6: 25-33.Google Scholar
  178. Gopalakrishnan M, Rajasekharasetty MR: Effect of papaya (Carica papaya Linn) on pregnancy and estrous cycle in albino rats of Wistar strain. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1978, 22: 66-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Emeruwa AC: Antibacterial substance from Carica papaya fruit extract. J Nat Prod. 1982, 45: 123-127. 10.1021/np50020a002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  180. Sripanidkulchai B, Wongpanich V, Laupattarakasem P, Suwansaksri J, Jirakulsomchok : Diuretic effects of selected Thai indigenous medicinal plants in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75: 185-190. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00173-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Anuar NS, Zahari SS, Taib IA, Rahman MT: Effect of green and ripe Carica papaya epicarp extracts on wound healing and during pregnancy. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008, 46: 2384-2389. 10.1016/j.fct.2008.03.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. Adeyemi OO, Yemitan OK, Afolabi L: Inhibition of chemically induced inflammation and pain by orally and topically administered leaf extract of Manihot esculenta Crantz in rodents. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 2: 6-11. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.05.019.Google Scholar
  183. Nguefack J, Budde BB, Jakobsen M: Five essential oils from aromatic plants of Cameroon: their antibacterial activity and ability to permeabilize the cytoplasmic membrane of Listeria innocua examined by flow cytometry. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004, 39: 395-400. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01587.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  184. Ntonifor NN, Ngufor CA, Kimbi HK, Oben BO: Traditional use of indigenous mosquito-repellents to protect humans against mosquitoes and other insect bites in a rural community of Cameroon. East Afr Med J. 2006, 83: 553-558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. Viyoch J, Pisutthanan N, Faikreua A, Nupangta K, Wangtorpol K, Ngokkuen J: Evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial activity of Thai basil oils and their micro-emulsion formulas against Propionibacterium acnes. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006, 28: 125-133. 10.1111/j.1467-2494.2006.00308.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. De Almeida I, Alviano DS, Vieira DP, Alves PB, Blank AF, Lopes AH, Alviano CS, Rosa MS: Antigiardial activity of Ocimum basilicum essential oil. Parasitol Res. 2007, 101: 443-452. 10.1007/s00436-007-0502-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. Bravo E, Amrani S, Aziz M: Ocimum basilicum ethanolic extract decreases cholesterol synthesis and lipid accumulation in human macrophages. Fitoterapia. 2008, 79: 515-523. 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.05.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  188. Kusamba C, Byamana K, Mbuyi WM: Antibacterial activity of Mirabilis jalapa seed powder. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991, 35: 197-199. 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90073-M.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  189. Shao F, Hu Z, Xiong YM, Huang QZ, Wang CG, Zhu RH, Wang DC: A new antifungal peptide from the seeds of Phytolacca americana: characterization, amino acid sequence and cDNA cloning. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999, 19: 262-268.Google Scholar
  190. Cáceres A, López B, González S, Berger I, Tada I, Maki J: Plants used in Guatemala for the treatment of protozoal infections. I. Screening of activity to bacteria, fungi and (protozoário) American trypanosomes of 13 native plants. J Ethnopharmaco. 1998, 62: 195-202. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00140-8.Google Scholar
  191. Iwalewa EO, Adewunmi CO, Omisore NO, Adebanji OA, Azike CK, Adigun AO, Adesina OA, Olowoyo OG: Pro- and antioxidant effects and cytoprotective potentials of nine edible vegetables in southwest Nigeria. J Med Food. 2005, 8: 539-544. 10.1089/jmf.2005.8.539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. Moura AC, Silva EL, Fraga MC, Wanderley AG, Afiatpour P, Maia MB: Antiinflammatory and chronic toxicity study of the leaves of Ageratum conyzoides L. in rats. Phytomedicine. 2005, 12: 138-142. 10.1016/j.phymed.2003.12.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. Singh HP, Batish DR, Kaur S, Kohli RK, Arora K: Phytotoxicity of the volatile monoterpene citronellal against some weeds. Z Naturforsch. 2006, 61: 334-340.Google Scholar
  194. Chah KF, Eze CA, Emuelosi CE, Esimone CO: Antibacterial and wound healing properties of methanolic extracts of some Nigerian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 8: 164-167. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.070.Google Scholar
  195. Moreira MD, Picanço MC, Barbosa LC, Guedes RN, Barros EC, Campos MR: Compounds from Ageratum conyzoides: isolation, structural elucidation and insecticidal activity. Pest Manag Sci. 2007, 63: 615-621. 10.1002/ps.1376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  196. Chiasson H, Bostanian NJ, Vincent C: Insecticidal properties of a Chenopodium-based botanical. J Econ Entomol. 2004, 97: 1373-1377. 10.1603/0022-0493-97.4.1373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Kumar R, Mishra AK, Dubey NK, Tripathi YB: Evaluation of Chenopodium ambrosioides oil as a potential source of antifungal, antiaflatoxigenic and antioxidant activity. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007, 10: 159-164. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.017.Google Scholar
  198. Candan F, Unlu M, Tepe B, Daferera D, Polissiou M, Sökmen A, Akpulat HA: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil and methanol extracts of Achillea millefolium subsp. millefolium Afan. (Asteraceae). J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 87: 215-220. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00149-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  199. Agbor GA, Vinson JA, Oben JE, Ngogang JY: In vitro antioxidant activity of three Piper species. J Herb Pharmacother. 2007, 7: 49-64. 10.1300/J157v07n02_04.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  200. Tabopda TK, Ngoupayo J, Liu J, Mitaine-Offer AC, Tanoli SA, Khan SN, Ali MS, Ngadjui BT, Tsamo E, Lacaille-Dubois MA, Luu B: Bioactive aristolactams from Piper umbellatum. Phytochemistry. 2008, 69: 1726-1731. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.02.018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. Dimo T, Nguelefack TB, Kamtchouing P, Dongo E, Rakotonirina A, Rakotonirina SV: Hypotensive effects of a methanol extract of Bidens pilosa Linn on hypertensive rats. C R Acad Sci Gen. 1999, 322: 323-329.Google Scholar
  202. Chang CL, Kuo HK, Chang SL, Chiang YM, Lee TH, Wu WM, Shyur LF, Yang WC: The distinct effects of a butanol fraction of Bidens pilosa plant extract on the development of Th1-mediated diabetes and Th2-mediated airway inflammation in mice. J Biomed Sci. 2005, 12: 79-89. 10.1007/s11373-004-8172-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  203. Sundararajan P, Dey A, Smith A, Doss AG, Rajappan M, Natarajan S: Studies of anticancer and antipyretic activity of Bidens pilosa whole plant. Afr Health Sci. 2006, 6: 27-30.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. Rojas JJ, Ochoa VJ, Ocampo AS, Muñoz JF: Screening for antimicrobial activity of ten medicinal plants used in Colombian folkloric medicine: a possible alternative in the treatment of non-nosocomial infections. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006, 6: 2-10.1186/1472-6882-6-2.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. Kviecinski MR, Felipe KB, Schoenfelder T, de Lemos Wiese LP, Rossi MH, Gonçalez E, Felicio JD, Filho DW, Pedrosa RC: Study of the antitumor potential of Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae) used in Brazilian folk medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 17: 69-75. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.017.Google Scholar
  206. Gbeassor M, Kossou Y, Amegbo K, de Souza C, Koumaglo K, Denke A: Antimalarial effects of eight African medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 25: 115-118. 10.1016/0378-8741(89)90051-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  207. Abreu IC, Marinho AS, Paes AM, Freire SM, Olea RS, Borges MO, Borges AC: Hypotensive and vasorelaxant effects of ethanolic extract from Jatropha gossypiifolia L. in rats. Fitoterapia. 2003, 74: 650-657. 10.1016/j.fitote.2003.07.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  208. Cetin H, Cinbilgel I, Yanikoglu A, Gokceoglu M: Larvicidal activity of some Labiatae (Lamiaceae) plant extracts from Turkey. Phytother Res. 2006, 20: 1088-1090. 10.1002/ptr.2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  209. Rim IS, Jee CH: Acaricidal effects of herb essential oils against Dermatophagoides farinae and D. pteronyssinus (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) and qualitative analysis of a herb Mentha pulegium (pennyroyal). Korean J Parasitol. 2006, 44: 133-138. 10.3347/kjp.2006.44.2.133.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. Pavela R: Insecticidal properties of several essential oils on the house fly (Musca domestica L.). Phytother Res. 2008, 22: 274-278. 10.1002/ptr.2300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  211. Cechinel Filho V, Santos AR, De Campos RO, Miguel OG, Yunes RA, Ferrari F, Messana I, Calixto JB: Chemical and pharmacological studies of Phyllanthus caroliniensis in mice. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1996, 48: 1231-1236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  212. Pérez-García F, Marín E, Cañigueral S, Adzet T: Anti-inflammatory action of Pluchea sagittalis: involvement of an antioxidant mechanism. Life Sci. 1996, 59: 2033-2040. 10.1016/S0024-3205(96)00556-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. Shi M, Chang L, He G: Stimulating action of Carthamus tinctorius L., Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels and Leonurus sibiricus L. on the uterus. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 1995, 20: 173-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  214. Islam MA, Ahmed F, Das AK, Bachar SC: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of Leonurus sibiricus. Fitoterapia. 2005, 76: 359-362. 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  215. Ahmed F, Islam MA, Rahman MM: Antibacterial activity of Leonurus sibiricus aerial parts. Fitoterapia. 2006, 77: 316-317. 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.03.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. Holetz FB, Pessini GL, Sanches NR, Cortez DA, Nakamura CV, Filho BP: Screening of some plants used in the Brazilian folk medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97: 1027-1031. 10.1590/S0074-02762002000700017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  217. Sharma P, Mohan L, Srivastava CN: Phytoextract-induced developmental deformities in malaria vector. Bioresour Technol. 2006, 97: 1599-1604. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  218. Schapoval EE, Vargas MR, Chaves CG, Bridi R, Zuanazzi JA, Henriques AT: Antiinflammatory and antinociceptive activities of extracts and isolated compounds from Stachytarpheta cayennensis. J Ethnopharmacol. 1998, 60: 53-59. 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00136-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  219. Schuldt EZ, Ckless K, Simas ME, Farias MR, Ribeiro-Do-Valle RM: Butanolic fraction from Cuphea carthagenensis Jacq McBride relaxes rat thoracic aorta through endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent mechanisms. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2000, 35: 234-239. 10.1097/00005344-200002000-00009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  220. Biavatti MW, Farias C, Curtius F, Brasil LM, Hort S, Schuster L, Leite SN, Prado SR: Preliminary studies on Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Berg.) and Cuphea carthagenensis (Jacq.) J.F. Macbr. aqueous extract: weight control and biochemical parameters. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93: 385-389. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.04.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. Nishino H, Hayashi T, Arisawa M, Satomi Y, Iwashima A: Antitumor-promoting activity of scopadulcic acid B, isolated from the medicinal plant Scoparia dulcis L. Oncology. 1993, 50: 100-103. 10.1159/000227156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  222. Ratnasooriya WD, Jayakody JR, Premakumara GA, Ediriweera ER: Antioxidant activity of water extract of Scoparia dulcis. Fitoterapia. 2005, 76: 220-222. 10.1016/j.fitote.2004.06.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  223. Latha M, Ramkumar KM, Pari L, Damodaran PN, Rajeshkannan V, Suresh T: Phytochemical and antimicrobial study of an antidiabetic plant: Scoparia dulcis L. J Med Food. 2006, 9: 391-394. 10.1089/jmf.2006.9.391.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Garcia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

ISSN: 1746-4269

Contact us