Skip to main content

Local and scientific knowledge in the school context: characterization and content of published works

Abstract

Background

Bridging the gap between local and scientific knowledge can have useful implications in the teaching-learning process because it can create environments conducive to the valorization of sociocultural diversity in schools. The present review aims to analyze the profile and contributions of scientific publications dealing with articulations between local and scientific knowledge in basic formal education.

Method

Combined searches of 14 terms related to ethnoscience and 20 terms of education were conducted in English, Portuguese, and Spanish using the databases of Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Scielo. The recovered works were filtered, organized in a spreadsheet, and analyzed for publication characteristics (year, author, periodicals, countries of origin of the authors, and countries surveyed) and contents of the studies (epistemological bases, techniques of application, and record of the articulation of local and scientific knowledge).

Results

The research field that establishes these articulations is growing, with 81% of the works being written in the English language. A total of 494 researchers were recorded. The USA, South Africa, Brazil, Canada, and Australia were the countries of origin of the first author for the majority (64%) of the works considered. Multiculturalism, Vygotskian theory of learning, postcolonial theory, constructivism, critical pedagogy, and the argumentation theory were the main theoretical bases of half of the recovered works in which some explicit theoretical orientation could be found. Teacher training and interviews stood out as important tools in the application and record of links between local and scientific knowledge, respectively.

Conclusions

Interdisciplinary approaches were common in the conception and application of pedagogical activities reported in the recovered works. Articulations between local and scientific knowledge are effective for culturally-sensitive scientific education, especially (but not exclusively) in schools directly related to traditional communities. There was a tendency to emphasize the teacher as a fundamental agent in the search for education that establishes these articulations. The authors of the analyzed works frequently indicated a need for greater proximity of the community to school spaces.

Background

Each human society, while dealing with natural resources in regular daily life, creates a unique body of knowledge [1]. Such knowledge may be referred to as indigenous, tribal, traditional, native, or rural, among others [2]. Here, we use the term “local knowledge.” This term refers to knowledge that is based on experience and reproduced in a culturally specific environment [3]. Therefore, this knowledge is different from scientific knowledge, which is developed through controlled experimentation and is produced within formal institutions [4].

In schools, aspects of local knowledge can be found in previous student knowledge [5], in multicultural curricula, and in the everyday practices of local communities. Schools, therefore, are spaces where students and teachers have the opportunity to realize in practice how science and other forms of knowledge may connect and benefit each other [6].

A concrete example can be found in an experience in Northeast Brazil, as reported by Baptista [7]. Using interviews, the author accessed previous knowledge brought to school by students who were also local farmers. From this, a didactic tool was developed which was used to compare scientific and local names of plant structures and parts. The tool was also used to discuss physiological and morphological changes in plants that the students observed in their everyday farming experience [7].

Another example is an experience with the Adi people in India, in which students were encouraged to interview local elderly people about plants that could be used as food. A recipe contest was then held using those plants as a reference. Thus, in this way, cultural information on the use of food plants was recovered and organized. Scientific learning was also fostered through the establishment of a herbarium [8].

However, studies have indicated the existence of a gap between school life, based only on scientific content, and the daily life of students, supported by local knowledge, which are not always called into dialogue [9, 10]. Situations of asymmetrical articulation are sometimes reported, where the inclusion of local knowledge in the teaching-learning process is carried out so as to “fit” into science, under the conditions of respect for established limits and perpetuation of the authority of scientific knowledge [11].

Schooling has been analyzed in two distinct ways in relation to local knowledge: sometimes as one of the causes of its erosion, as it opens a new generation to other forms of seeing the world; and as a possible solution against its disappearance, under the condition of a curriculum that values the local culture and its peculiarities [12].

The inclusion of local knowledge in the teaching-learning process can facilitate the understanding of subjects being developed on the conceptions of science, which are often distant from student experiences, and thus can represent a first step to opening doors to scientific literacy [13]. In this way, local knowledge constitutes a pedagogical, instructional, and communicative tool for the educator [14].

Articulating local and scientific knowledge leads students to a broader view of the world [15], and encourages respect for socially constructed forms of thought. Students are sociocultural subjects that, when included in the school environment, bring with them knowledge, cultures, and more-or-less conscious projects, as a result of their experiences [16].

Given the pertinence of establishing relationships among different types of knowledge in the teaching-learning process in the school context, a systematic analysis of the characteristics of publications with this as a theme would be beneficial. Such an analysis would contribute to a better understanding of the advances in this field, as well as indicate trends or possible new directions. It would also contribute to the construction of contextualized and culturally sensitive education.

The aim of the present study was to identify and characterize studies that made articulations between local and scientific knowledge in the school context in basic formal education. Furthermore, this study aimed to analyze the different contributions to the teaching-learning process that emerged from this relationship in the recovered works.

Thus, the following questions were considered: What are the general features of the set of recovered works? What are the arguments most frequently used by authors about the relevance of articulations between types of knowledge in formal education? What are the theoretical and methodological supports used by the authors in their approach to these articulations?

Methodology

In order to obtain a general characterization of what has already been published regarding the scope of our objectives, the following aspects were considered: total number, language and distribution of published works over time (years) and space (countries), and vehicles used for publication (journals, books, and proceedings) and frequency of certain selected search terms.

Search terms were selected by consulting publications that made the connection between local and scientific knowledge in the school context in the field of ethnoscience. Some terms were also gathered from previous work by Baptista and El-Hani [7], El-Hani and Mortimer [17], and El-Hani and Bizzo [18], because we recognize Charbel El-Hani as one of the pioneers in the study of ethnoscience and education, and who still stands out in the field till today.

The selection of terms and the accomplishment of pilot research followed the same methodological sequence carried out by Bartol and Mackiewicz-Talarczyk [19].

Thus, this first phase resulted in the selection of 14 terms from the field of ethnoscience and 20 from the field of education that could be efficient in the search for studies that related local and scientific knowledge in the school context (see Table 1).

Table 1 Terms related to ethnoscience and education selected in the first phase

While searching the word “education” combined with terms related to the ethnosciences, the word “school” was added. So, in that case, the final search was carried out combining ethnoscience-related terms, on one side, with the words “education” and “school” on the other side. This was done in order to maintain the focus of the study, since the objective was related to the school context.

In the second phase of the review, each term we had included in the first column of Table 1 was combined with each of the terms in the second column for searches of the following databases: Web of Science (www.webofknowledge.com), Scopus (www.scopus.com), Science Direct (www.sciencedirect.com), and Scielo (www.scielo.org).

To increase search specificity, the combined terms were enclosed in quotation marks, and their variations were made plural when applicable. Since combined searches were employed, each term in column 1 was searched together with each term of column 2, using the Boolean operator “AND”, as in the research by Barreto et al. [20].

The four databases included indexed journals in ten different areas: Agrarian Sciences, Biological Sciences, Health Sciences, Exact and Earth Sciences, Human Sciences, Applied Social Sciences, Engineering, Linguistics, Letters and Arts, and Multidisciplinary [21].

Searches were carried out in English, Portuguese, and Spanish in each of the databases. The pertinence of including the latter two languages is the large number of publications in the field of ethnoscience carried out by researchers whose origins are from countries such as Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico [22], besides the fact that Spanish, along with English, is one of the languages of global communication.

Thus, a total of 3360 searches of studies were carried out (14 ethnoscience terms combined with 20 education terms in three languages using four databases). Searches were carried out in January 2018 until December 2019.

All publications were considered from the beginning of coverage by each database until publications of December 2017. No filters were applied regarding the areas of knowledge within the databases and all types of publications that the bases covered were considered, that is, articles of scientific journals, book chapters, and conference proceedings, which were treated equally in our study as “works.”

The works resulting from the searches were first filtered by titles and abstracts, followed by a subsequent screening based on analysis of the complete contents of the works. The works were ultimately organized in electronic spreadsheets.

Only works that somehow related local knowledge with scientific knowledge in the basic school (elementary and high school) context were included, while works directed toward university education, such as that of Mulej and Sirca (2010) [17], were not. This decision was justified by differences in relation to basic education regarding the characteristics of the agents involved (teachers and students), public policies, and curricula. This decision was only methodological and does not diminish the scientific relevance of such publications, nor the perspective of them being used as a pedagogical tool, continuous training material for teaching staff, or a theoretical tool for the development of public education policies.

It should be noted that, for methodological purposes, works on the perception or transmission of knowledge that used the school environment as a place of study, but whose objectives and results were not directly linked to the teaching-learning perspective, such as Pontes-da-Silva [23] for example, were not included in this research.

The frequencies of works/year were submitted to regression analysis to obtain an equation for data prediction and the evaluation of changes over time. The dependent variable was the frequency of works that established articulations between local and scientific knowledge in the school context, while the independent variable was year of publication. We opted for the polynomial model, since it was the one that best fit the estimation of this information according to the coefficient of determination (R2). The journals in which the works had been published were characterized by their impact factor and h-index, which was obtained from Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com) and Scimago Journal and Country Rank (www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch). The impact factor corresponds to the average number of times the article in question has been cited in the last 2 years [24]. The h-index (h5) analyzes all articles published in a given periodical in a given period of time, compared with the total citations of the articles contained therein [25].

The country of origin of the first author was identified from the corresponding address provided in the works and/or searches with the full name of the researcher in general and specific search sites.

Multivariate analysis of simple correspondence was performed to determine associations between the frequencies of countries of origin of first authors and the frequencies of countries in which the surveys were carried out. The option to consider the first author followed the same methodology as Campos et al. [22]. Only five countries of origin were thus considered: the USA, South Africa, Brazil, Canada, and Australia. These countries were selected because they were the place of origin of more than 64% of the authors of the recovered works. The software TIBCO Statistica, version 13.3, was used in this analysis.

Correspondence analysis is usually used to associate all categories of a variable with all categories of another variable, generating a graphical representation in which closely located categories have stronger relationships than those that are more distant [26].

In order to quantify the presence of terms in the content of works, the simple frequency of works recovered from combinations of terms using the English language was determined.

Finally, the considered works were analyzed to characterize the content of the studies in question, raising information on some aspects such as the critical incorporation of local knowledge in the formal teaching process; the results obtained in order to articulate local and scientific knowledge in the school context; suggestions for future work; the epistemological visions that guided the work; and the methodological techniques used.

The methodological techniques adopted by the authors of the works were separated into two groups: those used by the researchers during activities to establish integrations between local and scientific knowledge (treated in this study as application techniques) and those performed later by the researchers to understand the results generated in these activities (here called evaluation techniques).

Results

General characterization of works

Grouping the works recovered from the four databases, and excluding those that were repeated, resulted in a final total of 266 studies that related local and scientific knowledge in the school context. Works were mostly written in English (81.2%), followed by Portuguese (9.8%) and Spanish (8.3%). Two works were recovered in French (0.8%) and one in Afrikaans (0.4%), which occurred by using the English language in their abstracts and keywords.

The earliest work recovered was the article titled “Science, health and everyday knowledge: a case study about the common cold,” published in the European Journal of Science Education in 1985 by sociologist Alan Prout. During the subsequent 22 years (from 1985 to 2007), the annual frequency of recovered works did not exceed seven per year. This was followed by a general increasing trend from 2008 to 2017. The polynomial model provided the best fit (R2 = 0.92) (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Number of works that establish articulations between local and scientific knowledge (1985 to 2017). Source: Database searches of Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Scielo

Analysis of means of dissemination revealed that 93% of the recovered studies were published in journals (n = 247), followed by 4% in books (n = 12) and 3% in conference proceedings (n = 8). The published books were in the social sciences area, while conferences were also in this area as well as in education and technology.

The works published in journals were distributed among 159 different vehicles, of which ten journals had more than three related articles. The word “education” was present in the title of eight of these ten journals (see Table 3).

The journals with the most studies that related local and scientific knowledge in the school context were Cultural Studies of Science Education (16 articles), followed by African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (ten articles), and International Journal of Science Education (nine articles) (see Table 2).

Table 2 Frequency of works that related local and scientific knowledge and scientometric indices for journals

The high frequency of articles published in the journals Cultural Studies of Science Education and African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education reveals their importance as vehicles of information on the connections among different types of knowledge in the school environment (see Table 2).

A total of 494 researchers, both authors and collaborators who worked on the connection between local and scientific knowledge in the school context, were recorded. The authors who have been dedicating themselves to this theme, who have published more related works, and who can serve as key authors for the study and understanding of research with this theme are Meshach Bolaji Ogunniyi of University of the Western Cape (South Africa) and Victoria Reyes-García of Universitat Autônoma de Barcelona (Spain) (six and five, respectively) followed by Glen S. Aikenhead of University of Saskatchewan (Canada) and Geilsa Costa Santos Baptista of Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (Brazil) (four works each).

The first authors of the recovered works were from 42 countries while their research was conducted in 48 countries (plus the Arctic region, where research did not clearly describe the entire territory covered). Study areas were not presented in 63 works because they were literature reviews.

Excluding review works, the countries of the first authors were, in decreasing order, the USA (n = 44), South Africa (n = 31), Brazil (n = 27), Canada (n = 18), and Australia (n = 11), which together accounted for 64% of the works that established articulations between local and scientific knowledge in the school context.

Brazil, South Africa, and Australia were the countries in which researchers were most likely to perform research in their own territory (89%, 87%, and 73%, respectively), while in the USA and Canada this phenomenon occurred in 61% and 44% of recovered works, respectively.

Correspondence analysis identified two dimensions, which explained 29% and 28% of the total variance of the data, respectively. The accumulation of total variance of the data in the first two dimensions (57%) indicates the adequacy of the correspondence analysis since it was able to reduce considerably the dimensionality of the data (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Correspondence analysis of the countries of origin of the first authors with the countries where the studies were carried out. Source: Databases searches of Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Scielo

A strong association was observed between authors from North American countries and research conducted outside their territories: USA (12 different countries from four continents) and Canada (seven different countries from three continents) (see Fig. 2)

Among the search terms related to ethnosciences, those that were most often found in the recovered works were those that made explicit references to “knowledge,” such as “indigenous knowledge,” “traditional knowledge,” and “ecological knowledge.” The only exception was “biocultural knowledge,” which was not found in the present study. Those terms containing the suffix “-ology” were less frequent than those in which the word “knowledge” was preceded by an adjective. The terms “ethnoecology” and “ethnopedology” were not present in any of the recovered works (see Table 3).

Table 3 Frequency of works that established articulations between local and scientific knowledge in the school context, obtained through the combined searches of terms of ethnoscience and terms of education, carried out using four databases and the English language

Among the terms related to the field of education, those referring to the school environment itself (“school”) and to the agents directly involved in the educational process (“student” and “teacher”) were the most frequently found in the recovered works, while terms that indicated lines of thought were less frequent (see Table 3).

Characterization of the objectives of the works

The recovered works that establish articulations between local and scientific knowledge in the school context represented several areas of knowledge. By the very nature of the search, works were recovered in the field of ethnoscience (e.g., “Are identities oral? understanding ethnobotanical knowledge after Irish independence (1937-1939)” [29] and “A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between students and herders in northern Kenya” [30]); as well as education (e.g., “Advancing educational diversity: antifragility, standardization, democracy, and a multitude of education options” [31] and “An education rooted in two worlds: The Karen of northern Thailand” [32]); or both areas (e.g., “A truth-based epistemological framework for supporting teachers in integrating indigenous knowledge into science teaching” [33]).

Other works that did not represent ethnoscience or education were also recovered, including areas such as sociology, anthropology, health, geology, mathematics, linguistics, and architecture, for example [34,35,36,37,38,39,40], respectively.

The objectives of works in which articulations between the two areas of knowledge in the school context were established also varied. Studies were recovered that aimed at the transmission of local knowledge in the school environment [41, 42], or addressed the detrimental influence of formal education on the knowledge systems of traditional people [30, 43]. Some works also included methods and techniques for teaching-learning processes, such as the use of didactic materials and sequences [44, 45]; or dealt with teacher education [46]; or analyzed the implications of using or not local knowledge in formal education systems and curricula; or even addressed epistemological conceptions that emerge from relationships between local and scientific knowledge [47, 48].

Inclusion of local knowledge in formal education systems

The inclusion of local knowledge in educational systems is presented in the works as positive [10], and there can even be considered a consensus regarding its importance in the valorization and recovery of the knowledge and experiences of students [49]. This is probably because students, as sociocultural subjects, have knowledge, culture, and projects as fruits of their experiences [16]. Communities in which students live may thus be places filled with inspiration, which, if properly approached, will make students critical agents of their own realities [39].

Some positive contributions to the teaching-learning process represented among the recovered works include (1) production of contextual teaching involving the perspective of Science, Technology, Society, and Environment [9]; (2) socially just education, which privileges the reasoning skills of students and encourages them to value their cultures [50, 51]; (3) teaching-learning process that is active [50, 52], questioning, and preparatory for decision making [52]; (4) expansion of learning horizons with student recognition of the information built by cultural groups outside the dominant culture, and the exploration of local issues [13, 37, 52,53,54], possibility of learning multiple forms of interpretation of problems and phenomena useful in several situations [39, 53]; (5) conservation and perpetuation of local knowledge [8, 30, 55]; (6) use of the environment as a formal learning tool [39, 55, 56]; (7) use of local knowledge as a pedagogical, instructional, and communicative instrument for the educator [14]; and (8) reinforcing the sensitivity of teachers and researchers to the specific sociocultural contexts of students [57].

Some of the works also highlighted the supremacy of scientific knowledge, sometimes termed as Western knowledge. As referring to the debate on this problem in the works under analysis, we identified the following main aspects:

  1. 1.

    Discussion about the claimed universality of scientific knowledge and the fact that local knowledge does not have the formal aspects of standard science [47, 54, 58, 59] and can be overpowered by the dominant culture [56, 60].

  2. 2.

    The possibility of students from culturally diverse backgrounds being forced to accept values and assumptions that do not fit to their realities, as well as being prevented from examining values, assumptions, and information present in other cultural perspectives [56, 58, 60].

  3. 3.

    Identification of educators as agents that can deal with articulations between types of knowledge. They can recognize culturally situated knowledge about biodiversity, language, and values locally related to natural resources [8, 55, 61, 62].

Some works also report that teachers’ use of strategies that integrate knowledge can make all students in the classroom feel they are considered [13, 63], as well as strengthen family-school partnerships [63].

Other works also recorded the pertinence of the applicability of local knowledge in school curricula [11] making it a potential key tool for revitalizing biocultural diversity and enhancing the fulfillment of educational objectives [48, 64].

Theoretical bases of the works

The introductory texts of the recovered works presented the theoretical assumptions that guided them, but not all were explicit in this aspect. In some cases, works only provided information on the use of local knowledge in the school context (for example [8, 33, 37, 42, 65]), while others on the role of schools in the transmission of knowledge (e.g., [42, 66, 67]) or on schooling and loss of knowledge (e.g., [41, 68, 69]).

A total of seventy-two theoretical assumptions were found in the set of recovered works. These are listed in Table 4 with the sources cited by the respective authors.

Table 4 Theoretical assumptions presented by works that established articulations between local and scientific knowledge

Methodological contributions

We divided the techniques into two phases. Phase I techniques are those used to articulate local and scientific knowledge. Phase II techniques are those used to collect and/or record the impressions and effects of phase I results.

The technique most used in phase I was teacher training (n = 19). The next most frequent techniques were guided or field visits with students within communities (n = 11) and lessons/conversations/group interviews involving local experts (n = 10) (see Table 5).

Table 5 Phase I techniques carried in activities that establish articulations between local and scientific knowledge

As for phase II, 28 techniques were performed by the authors. Of the total number of works, 87 had carried out literature reviews or were theoretical essays. Another technique used was the interview, both collectively and individually, involving students and/or teachers (n = 59), relatives, community members, or local experts (n = 20); or focus groups/group discussions (n = 20). A high frequency was also recorded for questionnaires (n = 29), documentary analysis (n = 27), direct observation (n = 19), action research (n = 18), and ethnography (n = 17) (see Table 6).

Table 6 Phase II techniques performed in to collect the impressions and effects of the activities

Discussion

The last decade has seen a quantitative increase in research works connecting different sources of knowledge in the school environment. Nevertheless, the data presented here reveal that the emergence of this kind of research is very recent (i.e., 1985). Furthermore, the number of works per year was very low in the two decades following the first recovered publication (Fig. 1).

Considering that the first formal specific publications in the ethnosciences arose at the end of the nineteenth century [293], a relatively long time elapsed (nearly one century) until the publication of the first works connecting ethnosciences and education. This gap seems to be related to the lack of connection between ethnoscientific published works on the one hand, and western studies on pedagogy on the other hand. A comment on this gap was made by French philosopher Bruno Latour (1987) [294] who noticed that studies on ethnoscience were “far remote from pedagogy.” Shortly thereafter, in the early 1990s, Brazilian educator Paulo Freire [295] registered a growth in ethnoscientific studies in Brazil and raised the possibility of relating those studies with the teaching-learning process. This means that, although a gap was noticeable, new research was being done to address that problem.

In “Pedagogy of the oppressed,” one of his seminal works, Freire [296] considered that education may be a domination practice that often reinforces the naïveté of students and their accommodation to serve the dominating class. This way of thinking is endorsed by the fact that the so-called local knowledge in the works recovered here generally arises from life experiences of culturally oppressed people. Thus, the late emergence of these recovered works, as well as the relatively slow growth of the “hybrid” research field that they represent, may be interpreted as a historical consequence of dominance over the last centuries.

Thus, through political actions, many local people have achieved some political awareness of the relevance of the local knowledge they bear. This seems to be related to what Hunn [2007] calls the fourth phase in the history of ethnobiology, in which local people can consciously judge and influence the objectives and methods of research and education works involving their participation.

This political awareness can sometimes result in the fruitful inclusion of local knowledge in formal teaching-learning experiences in various cultural contexts. Relevant examples come from multicultural education practices in the USA, Canada, and Australia, where cultural minorities have been submitted to strong oppression [47].

Regarding this possibility of sociocultural inclusion, the report of the International Commission on Education to UNESCO on 21st century education (1996) questioned the standardization of education as a result of globalization and the consequent damage to minority cultures. This report challenges the new century by proposing an education that will awaken a democratic civic culture while at the same time stimulates mutual respect of cultures based on the collective rights of all peoples on the planet [297]. The results of the present study show that, only 12 years later, the field of research under investigation exhibited increasing results in relation to the connection of knowledge proposed by UNESCO.

Almost all of the ten journals of the present study with more than three recovered works are included in the Scimago Journal & Country Rank [27], with the exception being “Ciência & Educação.” This latter journal is ranked in Plataforma Sucupira [298], which confirms its authenticity. Only one of these ten journals was in the field of ethnoscience (Table 2). This finding calls attention to the need for greater involvement of ethnoscientists in education.

All of the main countries of origin of the first authors of the recovered works (USA, Brazil, Canada, Australia, and South Africa) were colonized by European countries (Fig. 2). Furthermore, in all of them, indigenous people resisted cultural marginalization and homogenization. Attempts to integrate indigenous cultural heritage in formal curricula also occurred in all of these countries [260].

As for works specifically related to the ethnosciences, the relatively high frequency of works that used expressions such as “adjective + knowledge,” as compared to those using terms with the prefix “ethno-” (Table 3), is in agreement with the results obtained by the Brazilian ethnobiologist Natalia Hanazaki [143]. This author found more journals that published themes related to traditional ecological knowledge than those that used the “ethno-” prefix, with the use of this prefix being more prominent among Brazilian researchers.

The absence of results from the field of ethnoecology (Table 3) does not reflect the scenario found by a study that aimed to analyze the set of ethnoecological research until 2012, showing that the respective number of publications was growing despite ups and downs [299]. The study also only used the terms “ethnoecology” and “ethnoecological” in its search methodology. Since this field is hybrid in nature (between the natural and social sciences), it is likely that all the publications in this area were not compiled, since there are investigations that contribute to the field yet do not use these terms [299]. This same phenomenon may have occurred in the present study. It may also indicate that despite the great potential for connection between ethnoecology and education, there is a gap to be explored in this field, or that studies with ethnoecological characteristics are being incorporated by other fields, such as ethnobiology and studies on traditional ecological knowledge.

The variety of areas of research represented by the works recovered using the combination of terms from the fields of education and ethnoscience shows a potential to be harnessed, with contributions from different perspectives. This means that knowledge connections may, in principle, encompass all the disciplines that compose school curricula, thus enabling a comprehensive student formation, especially if applied in an interdisciplinary way (see [300] and [301]).

In general, judging from the content of the works recovered here, their main objective was not to take local knowledge as a substitution for science. This view reinforces the possibility for conceptual profile change (when a student keeps their previous knowledge and combines it with science) as presented by Mortimer [302].

Another common trend found here was that of the coexistence of different kinds of knowledge within teaching systems. This seems to be in agreement with the ideas of some authors related to argumentation theory [98, 302] and to epistemological pluralism [17, 99].

Multiculturalism, Vygotskian theory of learning, postcolonial theory, constructivism, critical pedagogy, and the argumentation theory were the main theoretical bases of half of the recovered works in which some explicit theoretical orientation could be found (Table 4). Some aspects are common to all of these theories: an active attitude of students in the teaching-learning process, the role of the teacher as someone who will mediate and stimulate this process, and the development of a critical attitude in relation to the dominant culture.

Regarding the relationship between culture and scientific education, emphasis on the critical attitude may be related to factors such as the growth of constructivism, the increase in the number of studies on the historical processes of curriculum development, growing critical attitudes of social groups in the face of western science, and the fact that western science often does not recognize other kinds of knowledge [17].

The fact that most of the recovered works are not based on, or do not clearly present, a guiding theoretical framework, suggests an opportunity for researchers to explicitly ground their studies in some theoretical framework.

The diversity of theoretical assumptions presented by the recovered works indicates a potential for connecting different types of knowledge, while deepening and valuing each (Table 4). A researcher can therefore find contributions that amplify the beneficial effects of this association. The same can be said for the diversity of methodological techniques applied to the study or establishment of connectivity between types of knowledge in the school context.

Despite the diversity of theoretical assumptions and techniques of the data collected (Tables 5 and 6), a study that analyzed the inclusion of local knowledge in the formal school system affirmed that education reformers, ethnobiologists, and cultural conservation professionals request this connection between different types of knowledge, but that few studies have examined this more detailed approach to the subject [48]. It is possible that the data presented by the present research will serve as an initial basis for future work from this perspective. It is noteworthy that it was not always easy to identify the methodological approach used in each work, which can make it difficult to replicate or analyze such research.

Some aspects of the present findings indicate that studies connecting scientific and local knowledge in schools represent a relatively new research field. These include the recent growth in the number of works per year, the concentration of most researchers in a small number of countries (Fig. 2), the small number of works for each author, and the high diversity of theoretical and methodological approaches (Tables 5 and 6). However, being “young” and expanding are not necessarily negative features of a field of inquiry. In fact, the diversity found here seems to indicate that different worldviews may be respected and valued, not only in the basic school context but also in the relationships among academic scientists who study the connections of local and scientific knowledge in the school context. We must finally stress the political necessity of reinforcing this connection in a permanent way.

Conclusions

The diversity of recovered works demonstrates the interdisciplinary nature of the knowledge fields we studied. Thus, ethnoscientists willing to search for connections with education may find valuable information in such diverse labels such as health, mathematics, geography, and especially education sciences.

Observing the results applied in various sociocultural realities reveals that the viability of this articulation in the teaching-learning process is widely effective. It seems to be effective not only in the educational context of communities classified as traditional, but in many other education-related scenarios, involving many types of students, be they indigenous, aboriginal, children of fishermen, farmers, artisans, quilombolas, or from urban environments. Since most of our results were concentrated in South Africa, the USA, and Brazil, we reinforce the need for further studies of this kind in other parts of the world.

The lack of a clear indication of a theoretical basis in many of the works suggests a need for researchers interested in establishing this type of relationship do delve deeper into epistemological issues. On the other hand, the diversity of methodological approaches we found shows a promising scenario in terms of ways of bridging knowledge from different cultural sources in educational research.

Teachers are a fundamental component in this process of searching for an education that values knowledge diversity and establishes articulations. For this, they need initial (for new professionals) and continuous (already active professionals) training, besides time for further investigation on the contexts of students and greater incentive for the activities that promote the integration of knowledge.

Finally, it is necessary to take advantage of the school environment as a place of integration and recognition of the community through public policies and effective actions of articulation of scientific (based on curricula) and local (rooted in the communities around the school) knowledge. The community must be attracted to be part of these spaces, being welcomed in view of the great importance of the knowledge built and shared by its individuals over generations and that constitute the sociocultural framework of the subjects in formation that the school receives every day.

Availability of data and materials

Data sets analyzed as part of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Albuquerque UP, Alves ÂGC. O que é etnobiologia? In: Albuquerque UP, editor. Introdução à etnobologia. Recife: NUPPEA; 2014. p. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Alves ÂGC, Souto FJB. Etnoecologia ou Etnoecologias? Encarando a diversidade conceitual. In: ALVES, A. G. C. SOUTO, F. J. B.; PERONI N (Org), editor. Etnoecologia em Perspect natureza, Cult e Conserv. Recife: Nupeea; 2010. p. 17–39.

  3. 3.

    AMGA W. Insights and applications local soil knowledge: a tool for sustainable land management. Soc Nat Resour. 1999;12:151–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alves AGC, Albuquerque UP. “Ethno what?” Terminological problems in etnhoscience with a special emphasis on the Brazilian context. Recent Dev case Stud Ethnobot. 2010;.

  5. 5.

    Baptista GCS. Importância da demarcação de saberes no ensino de Ciências para sociedades tradicionais. Ciência Educ. 2010;16:679–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cobern WW, Loving CC. Defining science in a multicultural world: implications for science education. Sci Educ. 2001;85:50–67..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Baptista GCS, El-Hani C. The contribution of ethnobiology to the construction of a dialogue between ways of knowing: a case study in a Brazilian Public High School. Sci Educ [Internet]. 2009;18:503–520. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9173-3%5Cnhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/7404801110107520/fulltext.pdf.

  8. 8.

    Singh RK, Singh A. Biodiversity and recipe contests: innovative socioecological approaches to capture ecological knowledge and conserve biodiversity in Arunachal Pradesh. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2013;12:240–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bejarano NRR, Brunet JMS, Bandeira FPSF, Bortoliero ST. A vida de alunos pescadores da comunidade de baiacu (Bahia) e sua relação com a escola: dois mundos distintos? Ciência Educ. 2014;20:159–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mack E, Augare H, Cloud-Jones LD, Davíd D, Gaddie HQ, Honey RE, et al. Effective practices for creating transformative informal science education programs grounded in Native ways of knowing. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2012;7:49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McKinley E. Locating the global: culture, language and science education for indigenous students. Int J Sci Educ [Internet]. 2005;27:227–41. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000325861%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000325861#.UqjtGSemYlQ.

  12. 12.

    Reyes-García V, Kightley E, Ruiz-Mallén I, Fuentes-Peláez N, Demps K, Huanca T, et al. Schooling and local environmental knowledge: Do they complement or substitute each other? Int J Educ Dev. 2010;30:305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Seraphin KD. Where are you from? writing toward science literacy by connecting culture, person, and place. J Geosci Educ [Internet]. 2014;62:11–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5408/12-413.1.

  14. 14.

    Dei GJS. Learning culture, spirituality and local knowledge: implications for african schooling. Int Rev Educ [Internet]. 2002;48:335–360. Available from: http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/498/art%3A10.1023%2FA%3A1021283730231.pdf?auth66=1399305084_fc4f06c31ca5d99e95db6be1b9b68743&ext=.pdf.

  15. 15.

    Kim E-JA, Dionne L. Traditional ecological knowledge in science education and its integration in grades 7 and 8 Canadian science curriculum documents. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ [Internet]. 2014 ;14:311–29. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84917681010&partnerID=40&md5=646e99c29c75c836ee23cc4be9c8b95b.

  16. 16.

    Oliveira RAN, Ferreira FC. Valorizando a cultura Guarani-kaiowá através do ensino do espaço e do tempo. Ciência Educ. 2017;23:759–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    El-Hani CN. Bizzo NMV. Formas de Construtivismo: Mudança Conceitual e Construtivismo Contextual. 1997:1–25.

  18. 18.

    Bartol T, Mackiewicz-Talarczyk M. Bibliometric analysis of publishing trends in fiber crops in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. J Nat Fibers. 2015;12:531–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    El-Hani CN, Mortimer EF. Multicultural education, pragmatism, and the goals of science teaching. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2007;2:657–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kalline F, Barreto DA, Magalhães R, Jr M, Fernandes VO, Oliveira R, et al. Chikungunya and diabetes , what do we know ? Diabetol Metab Syndr [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2018;1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-018-0329-2.

  21. 21.

    Brasil M da E. Portal de periódicos CAPES [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www-periodicos-capes-gov-br.ez19.periodicos.capes.gov.br.

  22. 22.

    Campos JLA, Sobral A, Silva JS, Araújo TAS, Ferreira-Júnior WS, Santoro FR, et al. Insularity and citation behavior of scientific articles in young fields: the case of ethnobiology. Scientometrics. 2016;109:1037–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pontes-da-Silva E, Pacheco MLT, Pequeno PACL, Franklin E, Kaefer IL. Attitudes towards scorpions and frogs: a survey among teachers and students from schools in the vicinity of an Amazonian protected area. J Ethnobiol [Internet]. 2016;36:395–411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-36.2.395.

  24. 24.

    Scarano FR. Why publish? Rev Bras Botânica. 2008;31:189–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Colepicolo E. Portal de Periódicos UFSCAR [Internet]. Como obter o Índice-H um periódico pela base Scopus? 2016 [cited 2018 Jul 23]. Available from: http://www.periodicos.ufscar.br/noticias/como-obter-o-indice-h-de-um-periodico-pela-base-scopus.

  26. 26.

    Batista LE, Escuder MML, Pereira JCR. A cor da morte: Causas de óbito segundo características de raça no Estado de São Paulo, 1999 a 2001. Rev Saude Publica. 2004;38:630–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Scimago Journal and Country Rank [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 8]. Available from: www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.

  28. 28.

    Scholar G. Metrics [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 21]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=metrics_intro&hl=en.

  29. 29.

    Shannon F, Sasse A, Sheridan H, Heinrich M. Are identities oral? Understanding ethnobotanical knowledge after Irish independence (1937-1939). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine; 2017;13:1–19.

  30. 30.

    Bruyere BL, Trimarco J, Lemungesi S. A comparison of traditional plant knowledge between students and herders in northern Kenya. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed [Internet]. 2016;12:48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0121-z.

  31. 31.

    Fortunato MWP. Advancing educational diversity: antifragility, standardization, democracy, and a multitude of education options. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands. 2017;12:177–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Odochao J, Nakashima D, Vaddhanaphuti C. An education rooted in two worlds: The Karen of northern Thailand. Int Soc Sci J. 2006;58:117–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zinyeka G, Onwu GOM, Braun M. A truth-based epistemological framework for supporting teachers in integrating indigenous knowledge into science teaching. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ [Internet]. 2016;0:1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2016.1239963.

  34. 34.

    Lewandowski S. Local Knowledge in Burkinabe Schools denial, exploitation, reinforcement. L’Homme. 2012:85–106.

  35. 35.

    Wyndham FS. Environments of learning: rarámuri children’s plant knowledge and experience of schooling, family, and landscapes in the Sierra Tarahumara. Mexico. Hum Ecol. 2010;38:87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Essé C, Koffi VA, Kouamé A, Dongo K, Yapi RB, Moro HM, et al. “Koko et les lunettes magiques”: An educational entertainment tool to prevent parasitic worms and diarrheal diseases in Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11.

  37. 37.

    Dublin R, Sigman M, Anderson A, Barnhardt R, Topkok SA. COSEE-AK ocean science fairs: a science fair model that grounds student projects in both western science and traditional native knowledge. J Geosci Educ [Internet]. 2014;62:166–176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5408/12-411.1.

  38. 38.

    Pais A. Criticisms and contradictions of ethnomathematics. Educ Stud Math. 2011;76:209–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rincón JA, Olarte AC. Fostering EFL learners’ literacies through local inquiry in a multimodal experience. Colomb Appl Linguist J [Internet]. 2016;18:67. Available from: http://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/ojs/index.php/calj/article/view/10610.

  40. 40.

    Herrmann V. Investing in community: conceptualizing inclusive school design for America’s Arctic. Polar Geogr [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2016;39:239–257. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2016.1239280.

  41. 41.

    Ladio AH, Molares S. Evaluating traditional wild edible plant knowledge among teachers of Patagonia: Patterns and prospects. Learn Individ Differ [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;27:241–249. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.002.

  42. 42.

    Scaramuzzi I. “Os tempos da história”: temporalidades, mito e história em materiais didáticos de autores indígenas. Soc e Cult. 2010;13:79–89.

  43. 43.

    Dussel I. A transmissão cultural assediada: Metamorfoses da cultura comum na escola. Cad Pesqui [Internet]. 2009;39:351–65 Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-74849107633&partnerID=tZOtx3y1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sousa MLJ de, Carvalho M de LD de, Kambeba M dos S. Currículo e tecnologias educacionais no contexto bioecológico da escola indígena: Escola Kanata T-Ykua do povo Kambema/ AM. Humanidades & Inovação. 2017;4:249–260.

  45. 45.

    Valderrama-Pérez DF, Andrade AM, El-Hani CN. Dialogue between scientific and traditional knowledge in the science classroom: development study of a teaching sequence in a school in Taganga (Magdalena, Colombia). Procedia -Social Behav Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;167:217–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.665.

  46. 46.

    Rodríguez Gómez HM, Yarza de los Ríos VA, Echeverri JA. Formación de maestros y maestras para y desde la diversidad cultural. Pedagog y Saberes [Internet]. 2016;0:23. Available from: http://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/PYS/article/view/4466.

  47. 47.

    Eijck M Van, Roth W-M. Keeping the local local: recalibrating the status of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in education. Sci Educ [Internet]. 2007;91:926–947. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164/abstract.

  48. 48.

    McCarter J, Gavin MC. Perceptions of the value of traditional ecological knowledge to formal school curricula: opportunities and challenges from Malekula Island, Vanuatu. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed [Internet]. 2011;7:38. Available from: http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/7/1/38.

  49. 49.

    Kovalski ML, Obara AT. O Estudo da etnobotânica das plantas medicinais na escola. Ciência Educ. 2013;19:911–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sugiono S, Skourdoumbis A, Gale T. Bridging homes and classrooms: advancing students’ capabilities. Teach Educ [Internet]. Routledge; 2017;6210:1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1346602.

  51. 51.

    Julio MB, Velarde NIC. Propuesta pedagógica para la incorporación de conocimientos tradicionales de Ciencias Naturales en Primaria. Rev Electrónica Investig Educ. 2016;18:161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Snively G, Corsiglia J. Rediscovering traditional science in multicultural science education. In: Liedtke WW, editor. Connect ’97. Victoria; 1997. p. 99–112.

  53. 53.

    Chang JM, Lee H, Yen CF. Alternative conceptions about burning held by Atayal indigene students in Taiwan. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2010;8:911–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Parmin, Sajidan, Ashadi, Sutikno. Skill of prospective teacher in integrating the concept of science with local wisdom model. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2015;4:120–6.

  55. 55.

    Anwari MSN, Sulistyowati E. Biological science learning model based on Turgo’s local wisdom on managing biodiversity. AIP Conf Proc. 2016;1708:03001-1-03001–6.

  56. 56.

    Quigley CF, Miller ZD, Dogbey J, Che SM, Hallo J. “No one should destroy the forest”: using photo-based vignette interviews to understand kenyan teachers’ views of the environment. Int J Sci Educ. 2014;36:2937–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yore LD. Science literacy for all students: language, culture, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events. L1–Educational Stud Lang Lit. 2008;8:5–21.

  58. 58.

    Snively G, Corsiglia J. Discovering indigenous science: implications for science education. Sci Educ. 2001;85:6–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Avery LM, Hains BJ. Oral traditions: a contextual framework for complex science concepts—laying the foundation for a paradigm of promise in rural science education. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands. 2017;12:129–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jagger S. “It’s more like what you think of land”: bringing together community and education through mapping. Learn Landscapes. 2016;10:105–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Aikenhead G. Toward a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Sci Educ. 1997;81:217–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Saito CH. Science and education across cultures: another look at the Negev Bedouins and their environmental management practices. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2014;9:977–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Coles-Ritchie M, Monson B, Moses C. Drawing on dynamic local knowledge through student-generated photography. Equity Excell Educ. 2015;48:266–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sharkey J, Olarte AC, Ramírez LM. Developing a deeper understanding of community-based pedagogies with teachers: learning with and from teachers in Colombia. J Teach Educ. 2016;67:306–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Carr T, Kenefic LS, Ranco DJ. Wabanaki Youth in Science (WaYS): A tribal mentoring and educational program integrating traditional ecological knowledge and western science. J For. 2017;115:480–3.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Garcia NB. Los saberes de las mujeres y la transmisión cultural en los materiales curriculares. Investig en la Esc [Internet]. 2008;11–22. Available from: http://ateneu.xtec.cat/wikiform/wikiexport/_media/cursos/escola_inclusiva/dco2/modul_3/rosa_sanchis.pdf.

  67. 67.

    Demps K, Dougherty J, Zorondo-Rodríguez F, Reyes-García V, García C. Schooling and local knowledge for collecting wild honey in South India: balancing multifaceted educations? Cult Agric Food Environ. 2015;37:28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cruz-Casallas NE, Guantiva-Sabogal E, Martínez-Vargas A. Apropiación de la medicina tradicional por las nuevas generaciones de las comunidades indígenas del Departamento de Vaupés, Colombia. Boletín Latinoam y del Caribe Plantas Med y Aromáticas. 2017;16:263–77.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Rozzi R. Biocultural ethics: Recovering the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits, and habitats. Environ Ethics [Internet]. 2012;34:27–50 Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84875307698&partnerID=40&md5=b58ddafcd4a2b11af093c12c17741400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Irzik G. Universalism, multiculturalism, and science education. Sci Educ [Internet]. 2001;85:71–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780405.

  71. 71.

    El-Hani CN, Bandeira FPS de F. Valuing indigenous knowledge: to call it “science” will not help. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2008;3:751–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Horenczyk G, Tatar M. Teachers’ attitudes toward multiculturalism and their perceptions of the school organizational culture. Teach Teach Educ [Internet]. 2002;18:435–45. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X02000082.

  73. 73.

    Melo-Brito NB. Los puentes en lα enseñanza de las ciencias: un compromiso para comprender las investigaciones sobre las relaciones entre conocimientos científicos escolares y conocimientos ecológicos tradicionales. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis TED. 2017;42:43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Niculae C. The introduction of cultural education in initial and continuous teacher training programmes in Romania. Operational perspectives. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;127:469–73. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042814023830.

  75. 75.

    Vargas JLY. Derroteros de la educación peruana en el XXI: interculturalizar, decolonizar y subvertir. Ens Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educ [Internet]. 2017;25:918–42. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-40362017005001108&lng=es&tlng=es.

  76. 76.

    Quilaqueo D, Torres H. Multiculturalidad e interculturalidad: desafíos epistemológicos de la escolarización desarrollada en contextos indígenas. Alpha (Osorno). 2013;285–300.

  77. 77.

    Gondwe M, Longnecker N. Scientific and cultural knowledge in intercultural science education: student perceptions of common ground. Res Sci Educ. 2015;45:117–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Mutekwe E. Advancing the learning equity agenda through a social constructivist epistemology to teaching and learning in the curriculum. Int J Educ Sci. 2017;17:197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Dopico E, Garcia-Vazquez E. Leaving the classroom: a didactic framework for education in environmental sciences. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2011;6:311–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mutekwe E. Improving learning equity through a social constructivist approach to teaching and learning: Insights from the Vygotskian socio-cultural approach. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2014;5:1093–9.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nashon SM, Madera EK. Instrument for assessing disposition for contextual learning of science of students in East Africa. SAGE Open. 2013;3:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Govender N. South african primary school teachers’ scientific and indigenous conceptions of the earth-moon-sun system. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2011;15:154–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Owusu-Mensah J, Baffour KPQ. Demystifying the myth of mathematics learning at the foundation phase: The role of Akan indigenous games (challenges and opportunities for indigenous knowledge systems (IKS) in the education system). Int J Educ Sci. 2015;8:313–8.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Mapara J. Indigenous knowledge systems in Zimbabwe: juxtaposing postcolonial theory. J Pan African Stud. 2009;3:139.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Glasson GE, Mhango N, Phiri A, Lanier M. Sustainability science education in Africa: Negotiating indigenous ways of living with nature in the third space. Int J Sci Educ. 2010;32:125–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Gonye J, Moyo N. Traditional African dance education as curriculum reimagination in postcolonial Zimbabwe: a rethink of policy and practice of dance education in the primary schools. Res Danc Educ. 2015;16:259–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mukhopadhyay S. West is best? a post-colonial perspective on the implementation of inclusive education in Botswana. KEDI J Educ Policy. 2015;12:19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Ninnes P. Representations of indigenous knowledges in secondary school science textbooks in Australia and Canada. Int J Sci Educ. 2000;22:603–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Giroux HA. Lessons from Paulo Freire. Chron High Educ [Internet]. 2010;57:B15–6. Available from: http://chronicle.com/article/Lessons-From-Paulo-Freire/124910/.

  90. 90.

    Madusise S, Mwakapenda W. Using school mathematics to understand cultural activities: How far can we go? Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2014;5:146–57.

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Harris CE, Barter BG. Pedagogies that explore food practices: resetting the table for improved eco-justice. Aust J Environ Educ [Internet]. 2015;31:12–33. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0814062615000129/type/journal_article.

  92. 92.

    Writer JH. “No matter how bitter, horrible, or controversial:” exploring the value of a native American education course in a teacher education program. Action Teach Educ. 2002;24:9–21.

  93. 93.

    Raina V. Between behaviourism and constructivism: quality education in a multicultural context. Cult Stud. 2011;25:9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Stears M, Malcolm C, Kowlas L. Making use of everyday knowledge in the science classroom. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ [Internet]. 2003;7:109–118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2003.10740553.

  95. 95.

    Vhurumuku E, Mokeleche M. The nature of science and indigenous knowledge systems in south africa, 2000–2007: a critical review of the research in science education. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2009;13:96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Erduran S, Simon S, Osborne J. TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Sci Educ. 2004;88:915–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Hewson MG, Ogunniyi MB. Argumentation-teaching as a method to introduce indigenous knowledge into science classrooms: opportunities and challenges. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2011;6:679–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Ogunniyi MB. Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 1. Int J Sci Educ. 2007;29:963–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Ogunniyi MB. Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 2. Int J Sci Educ. 2007;29:1189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Ogunniyi MB. The context of training teachers to implement a socially relevant science education in Africa. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2011;15:98–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Richards HV, Brown AF, Forde TB. Addressing diversity in schools: culturally responsive pedagogy. Teach Except Child. 2007;39:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Babbitt W, Michael L, Bulley E, Eglash R. Adinkra mathematics : a study of ethnocomputing in Ghana. Multidiscip J Educ Res. 2015;5:110–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Rioux J, Ewing B, Cooper TJ. Embedding aboriginal perspectives and knowledge in the biology curriculum: the little porky. Aust J Indig Educ [Internet]. 2017;1–13. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1326011117000126/type/journal_article.

  104. 104.

    Augare HJ, Davíd-Chavez DM, Groenke FI, Little Plume-Weatherwax M, Lone Fight L, Meier G, et al. A cross-case analysis of three native science field centers. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2017;12:227–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Marker M. After the Makah whale hunt: indigenous knowledge and limits to multicultural discourse. Urban Educ. 2006;41:482–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Taylor DL, Cameron A. Valuing IKS in successive South African physical sciences curricula. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2016;20:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Bhabha HK. The location of culture. London: Routledge; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Buendía E, Ares N, Juarez BG, Peercy M. The geographies of difference: the production of the East Side, West Side, and Central City School. Am Educ Res J [Internet]. 2004;41:833–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699465.

  109. 109.

    Stevenson B. Third spaces and video-stimulated recall: an exploration of teachers’ cultural role in an Indigenous education context. Educ Action Res. 2015;23:290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Bouchard G. What is interculturalism. Rev Droit McGill [Internet]. 2011;56:435–68 Available from: http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/userfiles/other/2710852-Bouchard_e.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Webb A, Radcliffe S. Unfulfilled promises of equity: racism and interculturalism in Chilean education. Race Ethn Educ [Internet]. Routledge; 2016;19:1335–1350. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2015.1095173.

  112. 112.

    Ladson-Billings G. Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. Am Educ Res J. 1995;32:465–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Mavuru L, Ramnarain U. Teachers’ knowledge and views on the use of learners’ socio-cultural background in teaching natural sciences in grade 9 township classes. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. Taylor & Francis; 2017;21:176–186.

  114. 114.

    Peña SC. The remix of culturally relevant pedagogy: pertinence, possibilities, and adaptations for the chilean context. Perspect Educ. 2016;56:109–26.

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Gay G. Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. J Teach Educ [Internet]. 2002;53:106–116. Available from: http://www.sagepub.com/eis/Gay.pdf.

  116. 116.

    Rahmawati Y, Ridwan A, Nurbaity. Should we learn culture in chemistry classroom? Integration ethnochemistry in culturally responsive teaching. AIP Conf Proc. 2017. p. 030009-1-030009–11.

  117. 117.

    Rahmawati Y, Ridwan A. Empowering students’ Chemistry learning : the integration of ethnochemistry in culturally responsive teaching. Chem Bulg J Sci Educ. 2017;26:813–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Sharkey J, Clavijo-Olarte A. Community-based pedagogies: projects and possibilities in Colombia and the United States. Break mold Educ Cult Linguist Divers students Innov Success Pract 21st Century. 2012;129–137.

  119. 119.

    Aikenhead GS. Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Stud Sci Educ. 1996;27:1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Borgerding LA. High school biology evolution learning experiences in a rural context: a case of and for cultural border crossing. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands; 2017;12:53–79.

  121. 121.

    Kana’iapuni SM, Ledward B, Malone N. Mohala i ka wai: cultural advantage as a Framework for Indigenous Culture-Based Education and Student Outcomes. Am Educ Res J. 2017;54:311–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Yazzie-Mintz T. Native teachers’ beliefs and practices : choosing language and cultural revitalization over uniformity and standardization. Contemp Issues Early Child. 2011;12:315–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Moll LC, Cathy A, Neff D, Gonzalez N. Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Pract. 1992;31:132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Ewing B. Rich and purposeful mathematical knowledge of mothers and children in a Torres Strait Islander community. Springerplus. 2014;3:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Armour D, Warren E, Miller J. Working together: strategies that support cross-cultural engagement of Indigenous teacher assistants working in Indigenous contexts. Asia-Pacific J Teach Educ. 2016;44:421–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Baptista GCS. Um enfoque etnobiológico na formação do professor de ciências sensível à diversidade cultural: estudo de caso. Ciência Educ. 2015;21:585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Baptista GCS, Carvalho GS. Science as a cultural activity: comparative study of Brazilian and Portuguese teachers’ conceptions about science. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2015;174:69–76. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815006795.

  128. 128.

    de Beer J. Re-imagining science education in South Africa: the affordances of indigenous knowledge for self-directed learning in the school curriculum. J New Gener Sci. 2016;14:34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Belay M, Edwards S, Gebeyehu F. Culture as an expression of ecological diversity: integrating awareness of cultural heritage in Ethiopian schools. Mt Res Dev [Internet]. 2005;25:10–14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741%282005%29025%5B0010%3ACAAEOE%5D2.0.CO%3B2.

  130. 130.

    Chinn PWU, Businger S, Lance K, Ellinwood JK, Stone K, Spencer L, et al. Kahua A ‘o—A learning foundation: using Hawaiian language newspaper articles for Earth Science professional development. J Geosci Educ. 2014;62:217–226.

  131. 131.

    Johnson AN, Sievert R, Durglo M, Finley V, Adams L, Hofmann MH. Indigenous knowledge and geoscience on the Flathead Indian Reservation, northwest Montana: Implications for place-based and culturally congruent education. J Geochemical Explor. 2014;62:187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Mclaughlin JM, Whatman SL. Beyond social justice agendas: indigenous knowledges in pré-service teacher education and practice in Australia. Int Perspect race (and racism) Hist Contemp considerations Educ Soc. 2015. p. 101–20.

  133. 133.

    Menezes MM, Bergamaschi MA. Pereira M da S. Um olhar sobre o olhar indígena e suas escol(h)as. Etnogr y Socioling la interaccion. 2015;23:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Mhakure D, Mushaikwa N. Science teachers’ indigenous knowledge identities. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2014;5:1554–63.

    Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Moss G. Diversity study circles in teacher education practice: an experiential learning project. Teach Teach Educ. 2008;24:216–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Parmin, Sajidan, Ashadi, Sutikno, maretta Y. Preparing prospective teachers in integrating science and local wisdom through practicing open inquiry. J Turkish Sci Educ. 2016;13:3–14.

  137. 137.

    Veintie T. Practical learning and epistemological border crossings: drawing on indigenous knowledge in terms of educational practices. Diaspora, Indig Minor Educ. 2013;7:243–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Verrangia D, Silva PBG e. Cidadania, relações étnico-raciais e educação: desafios e potencialidades do ensino de ciências. Educ e Pesqui [Internet]. 2010;36:705–18. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-97022010000300004&lng=pt&tlng=pt.

  139. 139.

    Bandeira F de A, Morey B. Pedagogia Etnomatemática: do “par de cinco” às concepções do sistema de numeração decimal. Bolema Bol Educ Matemática. 2010;23:1063–1080.

  140. 140.

    Bang M, Marin A. Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non-human agency and intentionality. J Res Sci Teach. 2015;52:530–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Carrin M. South Asian History and Culture Adivasi children and the making of indigeneity in Jharkhand. South Asian Hist Cult [Internet]. Routledge. 2015;6:348–64. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2015.1030872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Keane M. Science education and worldview. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2008;3:587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Pardo N, Wilson H, Procter JN, Lattughi E, Black T. Bridging Māori indigenous knowledge and western geosciences to reduce social vulnerability in active volcanic regions. J Appl Volcanol. 2015;4.

  144. 144.

    Aikenhead GS, Elliott D. An emerging decolonizing science education in Canada. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2010;10:321–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Baquete AM, Grayson D, Mutimucuio IV. An exploration of indigenous knowledge related to physics concepts held by senior citizens in Chókwé Mozambique. Int Jounal Sci Educ. 2016;38:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    de Guido L. FE, Dias IR, Ferreira GL. Miranda AB. Educação ambiental e cultura: articulando mídia e conhecimento popular sobre plantas. Trab Educ e Saúde. 2013;11:129–44.

    Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Roa JB. Entrevistas comunitarias, la recuperación del conocimiento comunitario desde la escuela. El caso de las Secundarias Comunitarias Indígenas, Oaxaca, México. Educ Policy Anal Arch [Internet]. 2015;23:95. Available from: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2081.

  148. 148.

    Ruddell N, Danaia L, Mckinnon D. Indigenous sky stories: reframing how we introduce primary school students to astronomy—a type II case study of implementation. Aust J Indig Educ. 2016;45:170–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Singh RK. Learning the indigenous knowledge and biodiversity through contest: a participatory methodological tool of ecoliteracy. Indian J Tradit Knowl. 2010;9:355–60.

    Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Chambers JM, Radbourne CL. Developing critical literacy skills through using the environment as text. Lang Lit. 2015;17:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Esa N, Jiwa RAM. Enhancing students’ local knowledge through themed garden project. Icolass 2014 - Usm-Poto Int Conf Lib Arts Soc Sci. 2015. p. 2–6.

  152. 152.

    Madiba M, Mphahlele L. Capturing cultural glossaries: case-study I. Lexikos. 2003;13:206–2014.

  153. 153.

    Anohah E, Suhonen J. Measuring effect of culturally responsive learning environment for computing education in african context. Probl Educ 21st Century. 2016;73.

  154. 154.

    Magnussen R, Elming AL. Student re-design of deprived neighbourhoods in minecraft : methods in cities at play study design, methods and data analysis. Community-Driven Urban Dev. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences; 2017. p. 271–8.

  155. 155.

    Nkopodi N, Mosimege M. Incorporating the indigenous game of morabaraba in the learning of mathematics. South African J Educ. 2009;29:377–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Lee H, Yen C, Aikenhead GS. Indigenous elementary students’ science instruction in Taiwan: Indigenous knowledge and western science. Res Sci Educ. 2012;2:1183–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Matang RAS, Owens K. The role of indigenous traditional counting systems in children’s development of numerical cognition: Results from a study in Papua New Guinea. Math Educ Res J. 2014;26:531–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Naidoo PD, Vithal R. Teacher approaches to introducing indigenous knowledge in school science classrooms. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2014;18:253–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Arenas A, del Cairo C. Etnobotánica, modernidad y pedagogía crítica del lugar. Rev Int Filos Iberoam y Teor Soc. 2009;14:69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Gomes LB. Em busca da Yvy Mara Ey (Terra sem Males): a procura por um território de visibilidade através da interculturalidade. POLIS, Rev Latinoam. 2014;13:133–47.

    Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Letsekha T, Wiebesiek-Pienaar L, Meyiwa T. Reflecting on the development of context-relevant teaching tools using local and indigenous knowledge. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;116:4577–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.989.

  162. 162.

    Meyiwa T, Letsekha T, Wiebesiek L. Masihambisane, lessons learnt using participatory indigenous knowledge research approaches in a school-based collaborative project of the Eastern Cape. South African J Educ [Internet]. 2013;33:1–15. Available from: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/93672755/masihambisane-lessons-learnt-using-participatory-indigenous-knowledge-research-approaches-school-based-collaborative-project-eastern-cape.

  163. 163.

    Rubio JS. The Ethnomathematics of the Kabihug Tribe in. Malaysian J Math Sci. 2016;10:211–31.

    Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Dolphen I. Learning language and culture through indigenous knowledge: a case study of teaching a minority language (Mon) in a majority language (Thai) school setting. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2014;134:166–175. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.236.

  165. 165.

    Marques MF, Hautequestt AP, Oliveira UB, de Freitas M-TV, Perkles OR, Zappes CA, et al. Local knowledge on native bees and their role as pollinators in agricultural communities. J Insect Conserv. Springer International Publishing. 2017;21:345–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Bang M, Warren B, Rosebery A, Medin DL. Desettling expectations in science education. Hum Dev. 2013;55:302–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Geldenhuys JL. South African Educators’ Voice on the potential role of traditional healers (THs) in education support services. J Psychol Africa. 2009;19:583–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Linares RE. Guided by care: teacher decision-making in a rural intercultural bilingual classroom in Peru. Intercult Educ [Internet]. Routledge; 2017;5986:1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1390941.

  169. 169.

    Croft A. Singing under a tree: does oral culture help lower primary teachers be learner-centred? Int J Educ Dev. 2002;22:321–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Grasser S, Schunko C, Vogl CR. Children as ethnobotanists: methods and local impact of a participatory research project with children on wild plant gathering in the Grosses Walsertal Biosphere Reserve, Austria. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed [Internet]. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine; 2016;12:1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0119-6.

  171. 171.

    Wood L, McAteer M. Levelling the Playing Fields in PAR: the intricacies of power, privilege, and participation in a university–community–school partnership. Adult Educ Q [Internet]. 2017;67:251–65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617706541.

  172. 172.

    Dupuis J, Abrams E. Student science achievement and the integration of Indigenous knowledge on standardized tests. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands. 2017;12:581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Ogunniyi MB. Teachers’ and Pupils’ Scientific and indigenous knowledge of natural phenomena. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2000;4:70–7.

    Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Rovera JCAS. Investigación colaborativa y decolonización metodológica con cámaras de video. Univ Rev Ciencias Soc y Humanas. 2017:161–77.

  175. 175.

    Duku N, Salami IA. The relevance of the school governance body to the effective decolonisation of education in South Africa. Perspect Educ. 2017;35:112–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Caquard S, Pyne S, Igloliorte H, Mierins K, Hayes A, Taylor F. A “Living” Atlas for Geospatial Storytelling : The Cybercartographic Atlas of Indigenous Perspectives and Knowledge of the Great Lakes Region. Cartographica. 2009;44:83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kraipeerapun K, Thongthew S. The development of ethnobotany curriculum for students in rural schools: An approach that incorporates the needs and insights of local communities. Int Educ J. 2007;8:64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Msimanga A, Lelliott A. Talking science in multilingual contexts in South Africa: possibilities and challenges for engagement in learners home languages in high school classrooms. Int J Sci Educ. 2014;36:1159–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Dorner DG, Gorman GE. Contextual factors affecting learning in Laos and the implications for information literacy education. Inf Res An Int Electron J. 2011;16:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Klein J. Education as change indigenous knowledge and education—the case of the Nama people in Namibia. Educ as Chang. 2011;15:81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Babaian C, Twigg P. The power of plants: introducing ethnobotany & Biophilia into your biology class. Am Biol Teach [Internet]. 2011;73:217–221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.4.6.

  182. 182.

    Maema M, Terzoli A, Thinyane M. A Look into classification : towards building an indigenous knowledge platform for educational Use. IST-Africa. 2013. p. 1–8.

  183. 183.

    Keane M, Khupe C, Seehawer M. Decolonising methodology: who benefits from indigenous knowledge research? Educ Res Soc Chang. 2017;6:12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Ajayi L. Investigating effective teaching methods for a place-based teacher preparation in a rural community. Educ Res Policy Pract. 2014;13:251–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Eglash R, Bennett A, O’Donnell C, Jennings S, Cintorino M. Culturally situated design tools: ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. Am Anthropol. 2006;108:347–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Aikenhead GS. Enhancing school mathematics culturally: a path of reconciliation. Can J Sci Math Technol Educ [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2017;17:73–140. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2017.1308043.

  187. 187.

    Anazifa D, Hadi RF. The integration of Javanese indigenous knowledge in biology learning resources development. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017.

  188. 188.

    Asabere-ameyaw A, Dei GJS, Raheem K. Contemporary issues in African sciences and science education. Asabere-Ameyaw A, Dei GJS, Raheem K, editors. Contemp. Issues African Sci. Sci. Educ. Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2015.

  189. 189.

    Avanzi MR. Saberes em diálogo: para uma educação de base complexa. Rev Paradig. 2016;XXXVII:26–38.

  190. 190.

    Avery LM. Rural science education: valuing local knowledge. Theory Pract. 2013;52:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Baronnet B. Estrategias Alternativas De Educación En Las Luchas De Los Pueblos Originarios En México. Educ Soc [Internet]. 2017;38:689–704. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-73302017000300689&lng=es&tlng=es.

  192. 192.

    Bhola HS. Reclaiming old heritage for proclaiming future history: the knowledge-for-development debate in African contexts. Afr Today. 2002;49:3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Bledsoe C. The cultural transformation of western education in Sierra Leone. Africa J Int African Inst [Internet]. 1992;62:182–202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2016.1262182.

  194. 194.

    Brown JC. Research Article A Metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry-based science education in K-12 Settings : implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. J Res Sci Teach. 2017;54:1143–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Celani MAA. Um desafio na Linguística Aplicada contemporânea: a construção de saberes locais. DELTA Doc Estud em Lingüística Teórica e Apl. 2016;32:543–56.

    Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Coelho LMC da C, Maurício LV. Sobre tempo e conhecimentos praticados na escola de tempo integral. Educ Real. 2016;41:1095–1112.

  197. 197.

    Conradie EM, du Toit CW. Knowledge, values, and beliefs in the South African contex since 1948: an overview. Zygon. 2015;50:455–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Le Cordeur M. Die kwessie van Kaaps: Afrikaansonderrig op skool benodig’n meer inklusiewe benadering: navorsings-en oorsigartikels. Tydskr vir Geesteswetenskappe. 2015;55:712–28.

    Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Cost DS. The role of public education in governance for resilience in a rapidly changing arctic. Ecol Soc. 2015;20:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Mueller MP, Tippins DJ. van Eijck and Roth’s utilitarian science education: why the recalibration of science and traditional ecological knowledge invokes multiple perspectives to protect science education from being exclusive. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2010;5:993–1007.

  201. 201.

    Ferreira WA de A, Zitkoski JJ. Educação escolar indígena na perspectiva da educação popular: em defesa da pedagogia cosmo-antropológica. Rev Eletrônica do Mestr em Educ Ambient. 2017;34:4–20.

  202. 202.

    Giardinetto JRB. A escola e o ensino da matemática frente a discursos interculturais: reflexões quanto a relação entre o conhecimento local e o conhecimento global. CONFERÊNCIA Interam Educ MATEMÁTICA. 2003. p. 1–16.

  203. 203.

    Gopinathan S. Challenging the paradigm: notes on developing an indigenized teacher education curriculum. Improv Sch. 2006;9:261–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Le Grange L. Integrating western and indigenous knowledge systems: the basis for effective science education in South Africa? Int Rev Educ. 2007;53:577–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Grauvogel J. Indigenous knowledge and public education in sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Spectr. 2015;50:57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Hallinger P. Unseen forces: the impact of socieal culture on school leadership. Peabody J Sci Educ. 1998;73:126–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Harrington BG, Pavel MD. Using indigenous educational research to transform mainstream education: a guide for P-12 school leaders. Am J Educ. 2013;119:487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Heckenberg R. 2014 Australian association for research in education learning in place, cultural mapping and sustainable values on the Millawa Billa (Murray River). Aust J Indig Educ. 2015;45:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Kawagley AO, Norris-Tull D, Norris-Tull RA. The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. J Res Sci Teach. 1998;35:133–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Kim M. Indigenous knowledge in Canadian science curricula: cases from Western Canada. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands. 2017;12:605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Kimmerer RW. Searching for synergy: integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. J Environ Stud Sci. 2012;2:317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Krugly-Smolska E. Cultural influences in science education. Int J Sci Educ. 1995;17:45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    Lowan-Trudeau G. Gateway to understanding: indigenous ecological activism and education in urban, rural, and remote contexts. Cult Stud Sci Educ. Springer Netherlands. 2017;12:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    Maldonado-Alvarado B. Hacia un país plural: educación comunitaria en Oaxaca frente a la política de interculturalidad cero. Liminar. 2016;14:47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. 215.

    Martínez AJG. Argumentation and indigenous knowledge : socio-historical influences in contextualizing an argumentation model in South African schools. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2016;6:719–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    McCarter J, Gavin MC, Baereleo S, Love M. The challenges of maintaining indigenous ecological knowledge. Ecol Soc. 2014;19.

  217. 217.

    Mckinley E, Keegan PJ. Curriculum and language in Aotearoa New Zealand: from science to Putaiao. Educ Stud Lang Lit. 2008;8:135–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Meaney T, Evans D. What is the responsibility of mathematics education to the Indigenous students that it serves? Educ Stud Math. 2013:481–96.

  219. 219.

    Menefee T, Asino TI. Beyond pure forms: appraising the role of indigenous knowledge in teacher training. Annu Rev Comp Int Educ 2014. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014. p. 23–35.

  220. 220.

    Meunier O. École d’aujourd’hui et savoirs traditionnels (Niger, Réunion, Brésil). Cah Int Sociol [Internet]. 2008;125:307–329. Available from: https://www.cairn.info/article_p.php?ID_ARTICLE=CIS_125_0307.

  221. 221.

    Meunier O. Dynamique de l’éducation bilingue interculturelle dans l’amazonie brésilienne. Int Rev Sociol. 2010;20:391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Meyer MH, Barker AFG. Teaching horticulture and native American agricultural traditions: an annotated bibliography. Horttechnology. 1997;7:110–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Molina-Andrade A, Mojica L. Enseñanza como puente entre conocimientos científicos escolares y conocimientos ecológicos tradicionales. Magis Rev Int Investig en Educ. 2013;6:37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Ng’asike JT. African early childhood development curriculum and pedagogy for Turkana Nomadic Pastoralist Communities of Kenya. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2014:43–60.

  225. 225.

    Nhalevilo EZ de FA. Rethinking the history of inclusion of IKS in school curricula: endeavoring to legitimate the subject. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2012;11:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Ogunniyi MB, Rollnick M. Pre-service science teacher education in Africa: Prospects and challenges. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2015;26:65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Orozco CEP. Diálogo de saberes en el sistema de educación indígena propio de Colombia: hermenéutica contra inconmensurabilidad. Cuad Filos Latinoam. 2015;36:61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    Postiglione GA. Ethnic minority identity and educational outcomes in a rising China. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaw B, editors. Int Encycl Educ. Oxford: Elsevier; 2010. p. 616–22.

    Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Rapimán DQ. Saberes y conocimientos indígenas en la formación de profesores de educación intercultural. Educ em Rev. 2007:223–39.

  230. 230.

    Reis G, Ng-A-Fook N. TEK talk: so what? Language and the decolonization of narrative gatekeepers of science education curriculum. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2010;5:1009–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Reyes-García V. Introduction to special section: on the relations between schooling and local knowledge. Learn Individ Differ. 2013;27:201–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Roué M. Healing the wounds of school by returning to the land: Cree elders come to the rescue of a lost generation. Int Soc Sci J. 2006;58:15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Sarangapani PM. Indigenising curriculum: questions posed by Baiga vidya. Comp Educ. 2003;39:199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Semali L. Community as classroom: dilemmas of valuing African indigenous literacy in education. Int Rev Educ. 1999;45:305–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    de TB da Silva P, Araújo MIO. Diálogos sobre interculturalidade, conhecimento científico e conhecimentos tradicionais na educação escolar indígena. Práxis Educ. 2015;11:153–76.

    Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Sumida HE. Transforming education, transforming society: the co-construction of critical peace education and Indigenous education. J Peace Educ. 2011;8:243–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Tippeconnic JW, Faircloth SC. The education of indigenous students. Int Encycl Educ. 2010:661–6.

  238. 238.

    Trommsdorff G, Dasen P. Cross-cultural study of education. Int Encycl Soc Behav Sci:2001, 327–33.

  239. 239.

    Trueba AIL. Las disciplinas científicas: ¿referencia única para seleccionar contenidos para la educación científica básica en México? Educ Química [Internet]. Elsevier; 2009;20:263–271. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0187893X18300624.

  240. 240.

    Urrieta L Jr. Learning by observing and pitching in and the connections to native and indigenous knowledge systems. Adv Child Dev Behav, JAI. 2015:357–79.

  241. 241.

    Verrangia D. Conhecimentos tradicionais de matriz africana e afro-brasileira no ensino de Ciências: um grande desafio. Rev África e Africanidades. 2010.

  242. 242.

    Verrangia D. A formação de professores de Ciências e Biologia e os conhecimentos tradicionais de matriz africana e afro-brasileira. Magis Rev Int Investig en Educ. 2013;6:105–17.

    Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Wråkberg U, Granqvist K. Decolonizing technoscience in northern Scandinavia: the role of scholarship in Sámi emancipation and the indigenization of western science. J Hist Geogr [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;44:81–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2013.12.005.

  244. 244.

    Arofah L. Relation between multicultural education, sociology, and indigenous knowledge. 1st Int Conf Soc Sci Educ Multicult Transform Educ Soc Sci Wetl Environ 2017). 2017. p. 188–92.

  245. 245.

    Cardoso LDR, Araújo MI de O. Currículo de ciências: professores e escolas do campo. Rev Ens. 2012;14:121–35.

    Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Fuhai A. The basis for integrating local knowledge into the school curriculum for Tibetans in Southern Gansu. Chinese Educ Soc [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2017;50:12–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2016.1262182.

  247. 247.

    Geissler PW. ‘Worms are our life’, part II: Luo children’s thoughts about worms and illness. Anthropol Med [Internet]. 1998;5:133–144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.1998.9964554.

  248. 248.

    Ma H. Chinese teachers’ views of teaching culturally related knowledge in school science. Prof Knowl base Sci Teach. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. p. 153–171.

  249. 249.

    Perrelli MADS. “Conhecimento tradicional” e currículo multicultural: notas com base em uma experiência com estudantes indígenas Kaiowá/Guarani. Ciência Educ. 2008;14:381–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Prout A. Science, health and everyday knowledge: a case study about the common cold. Eur J Sci Educ. 1985;7:399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. 251.

    Rojas-Maturana M, Peña-Cortés F. Saberes ambientales lafkenche en escuelas de la costa de La Araucanía (Chile). Rev Latinoam Ciencias Soc Niñez y Juv [Internet]. 2015;13:1207–20. Available from: http://revistalatinoamericanaumanizales.cinde.org.co/?page_id=5233.

  252. 252.

    Ruiz-Mallén I, Barraza L, Bodenhorn B, Reyes-García V. School and local environmental knowledge, what are the links? A case study among indigenous adolescents in Oaxaca. Mexico. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ. 2009;18:82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  253. 253.

    Sepulveda JM, Pena SB, Merino ME. Curriculum violence: occidental knowledge hegemony in relation to indigenous knowledge. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;190:434–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.022.

  254. 254.

    Shizha E. Indigenous? What indigenous knowledge? Beliefs and attitudes of rural primary school teachers towards indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum in Zimbabwe. Aust J Indig Educ. 2008;37:80–90.

  255. 255.

    Shizha E. Critical analysis of problems encountered in incorporating indigenous knowledge in science teaching by primary school teachers in Zimbabwe. Alberta J Educ Res. 2014;53:302–19.

    Google Scholar 

  256. 256.

    Thomas REW, Teel TL, Bruyere BL. Seeking excellence for the land of paradise: Integrating cultural information into an environmental education program in a rural Hawai’ian community. Stud Educ Eval [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;41:58–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.010.

  257. 257.

    Thomson N. Science education researchers as orthographers: documenting Keiyo (Kenya) knowledge, learning and narratives about snakes. Int J Sci Educ. 2003;25:89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  258. 258.

    Webb P. Xhosa indigenous knowledge: stakeholder awareness, valeu, and choice. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2013;11:89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  259. 259.

    Wiener CS, Matsumoto K. Ecosystem pen pals: using place-based marine science and culture to connect students. J Geosci Educ [Internet]. 2014;62:41–8. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84897639702&partnerID=40&md5=3003e8f681e3c20e5b5bc5282de01c8c.

  260. 260.

    Aravena F. Análisis comparado sobre patrimonio cultural indígena y currículo: Austrália, Chile y Sudáfrica. Calid en la Educ. 2017;12:165–92.

    Google Scholar 

  261. 261.

    Berkley AR. Respecting Maya language revitalization. Linguist Educ. 2001;12:345–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  262. 262.

    Cameron J, Mulligan M, Wheatley V. Building a place-responsive society through inclusive local projects and networks. Local Environ. 2004;9:147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  263. 263.

    Goldenberg C, Gallimore R. Local knowledge, research change : a case study of early Spanish reading improvement. Educ Res. 1991;20:2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  264. 264.

    Matemba YH, Lilemba JM. Challenging the status quo: reclaiming indigenous knowledge through Namibia’s postcolonial education system. Diaspora, Indig Minor Educ [Internet]. Routledge; 2015;9:159–174. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2014.997382.

  265. 265.

    Morcom LA. Indigenous holistic education in philosophy and practice, with wampum as a case study. Foro Educ. 2017;15:121–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. 266.

    Hwa K-Y, Kai-Lung W. The effectiveness of cultural inclusive health education peradogy for Taiwan indigenous elementary students through e-Platform: an case in Tayal, Paiwan and Bunun Tribes. Platf Technol Serv (PlatCon), 2016 Int Conf on IEEE. 2016.

  267. 267.

    Millán EQ, Mella EHR, Saavedra SM, Rapimán DQ. Conocimiento educativo en el contexto escolar y en la educación familiar mapuche: principales tensiones epistemológicas. Rev Bras Educ. 2017;22:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  268. 268.

    Pauka S, Treagust DF, Waldrip B. Village elders’ and secondary school students’ explanations of natural phenomena in Papua New Guinea. Int J Sci andMathematics Educ. 2005;3:213–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  269. 269.

    Quintriqueo S, Torres H, Gutiérrez M, Sáez D. Articulación entre el conocimiento cultural mapuche y el conocimiento escolar en ciencia. Educ y Educ. 2011;14:475–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  270. 270.

    Taylor DRF, Cowan C, Ljubicic GJ, Sullivan C. Cybercartography for education: The application of cybercartography to teaching and learning in nunavut, canada. Mod Cartogr Ser [Internet]. Elsevier; 2014. p. 297–324. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62713-1.00020-9.

  271. 271.

    Vlaardingerbroek B. Ethnoscience and science teacher training in Papua New Guinea. J Educ Teach. 1990;16:217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  272. 272.

    Breidlid A. Culture, indigenous knowledge systems and sustainable development: A critical view of education in an African context. Int J Educ Dev. 2009;29:140–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  273. 273.

    Chu Y. The power of knowledge: a critical analysis of the depiction of ethnic minorities in China’s elementary textbooks. Race Ethn Educ. 2015;18:469–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. 274.

    Dempster ER, Hugo W. Introducing the concept of evolution into South African schools: science education. S Afr J Sci. 2006;102:106–12.

    Google Scholar 

  275. 275.

    Erduran S, Msimanga A. Science curriculum reform in South Africa: lessons for professional development from research on argumentation in science education. Educ as Chang. 2014;18:S33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  276. 276.

    Fyhn AB. Sami culture and values: a study of the national mathematics exam for the compulsory school in Norway. Interchange. 2014;44:349–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  277. 277.

    Chinsembu KC, Shimwooshili-shaimemanya CN, Kasanda CD, Zealand D. Indigenous knowledge of HIV/AIDS among High School students in Namibia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  278. 278.

    McCarter J, Gavin MC. In situ maintenance of traditional ecological knowledge on Malekula Island, Vanuatu. Soc Nat Resour [Internet]. 2014;27:1115–1129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.905896.

  279. 279.

    Singh-Pillay A, Alant BP, Nwokocha G. Tapping into basic 7-9 science and technology teachers’ conceptions of indigenous knowledge in Imo State, Nigeria. African J Res Math Sci Technol Educ [Internet]. Taylor & Francis; 2017;21:125–35. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1327240.

  280. 280.

    Nuñez J. Los saberes campesinos: implicaciones para una educación rural. Investig y Postgrado. 2004;19:11–58.

    Google Scholar 

  281. 281.

    Valadares JM, Silveira Júnior C. Entre o cristal e a chama: a natureza e o uso do conhecimento científico e dos saberes tradicionais numa disciplina do curso de formação intercultural para educadores indígenas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (FIEI/UFMG). Ciência Educ [Internet]. 2016;22:541–53. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-73132016000200541&lang=pt.

  282. 282.

    Apodaca EEG. Apropiación étnica de la escuela entre los pueblos mixes de Oaxaca La educación comunitaria e intercultural vista desde sus jóvenes. Perfiles Educ. 2013;35:65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  283. 283.

    Jiménez NNV, Gullo MAC, Montes JEO. Percepción del proceso de alfabetización de jóvenes y adultos indígenas del Departamento de Guainía (Colombia): la mirada de sus protagonistas. Investig y Desarro. 2016;24:118–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  284. 284.

    Marqui AR, Beltrame CB. As experiências Xikrin e Baniwa com os conhecimentos tradicionais nas escolas. Univ Humanística [Internet]. 2017;84:239–61 Available from: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/univhumanistica/article/view/18749.

    Google Scholar 

  285. 285.

    Murillo LA. “This great emptiness we are feeling”: toward a decolonization of schooling in Simunurwa. Colombia. Anthropol Educ Q. 2009;40:421–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  286. 286.

    Huaman ES, Valdiviezo LA. Indigenous knowledge and education from the Quechua community to school: beyond the formal/non-formal dichotomy. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2014;27:65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  287. 287.

    Reta M. Border crossing knowledge systems: a PNG teacher’s autoethnography. Aust J Indig Educ. 2010;39:128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  288. 288.

    Bastos PCRR, Palha M das DC, Fonseca M de J da CF, Silva A do SL. Etnozoologia E Educação Ambiental Para Escolas Da Amazônia: Experimentação De Indicadores Quantitativos. Trab Educ e Saúde [Internet]. 2016;14:825–48. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-77462016000300825&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en.

  289. 289.

    Handa VC, Tippins DJ. Tensions in the third space: locating relevancy in preservice science teacher preparation. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2013;11:237–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  290. 290.

    de Beer J, van Wyk B-E. Doing an ethnobotanical survey in the life sciences classroom. Am Biol Teach. 2011;73:90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  291. 291.

    Núñez J. Prácticas sociales campesinas: saber local y educación rural. Investig y Postgrado. 2008;23:45–89.

    Google Scholar 

  292. 292.

    Boyette AH, Hewlett BS. Autonomy, equality, and teaching among Aka foragers and Ngandu farmers of the Congo Basin. Human Nature: Hum. Nat; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  293. 293.

    Sobral A, Albuquerque UP de. História da etnobiologia. Introdução à etnobologia. Recife: Nupeea; 2014. p. 23–28.

  294. 294.

    Latour B. Science in action. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press Cambridge; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  295. 295.

    Freire P. Pedagogia da Esperança. 1a. Paz e Terra: São Paulo; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  296. 296.

    Freire P. Pedagogia do oprimido. 23rd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  297. 297.

    Delors J, Amagi AI, Carneiro R, Chung F, Geremek B, Gorham W, et al. Educação um tesouro a descobrir: Relatório para a UNESCO da Comissão Internacional sobre Educaçaõ para o século XXI. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  298. 298.

    BRASIL C de A de P de NS. Plataforma Sucupira [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/veiculoPublicacaoQualis/listaConsultaGeralPeriodicos.jsf.

  299. 299.

    Toledo VM, Alarcón-Cháires P. La Etnoecología hoy: Panorama , avances , desafíos. Etnoecológica. 2012;IX:1–16.

  300. 300.

    Verma P, Vaughan K, Martin K, Pulitano E, Garrett J, Piirto DD. Integrating indigenous knowledge and western science into forestry, natural resources, and environmental programs. J For [Internet]. 2016;114:648–655. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-090.

  301. 301.

    Vougioukalou SA, Barfield K, Huish RD, Shiels L, Brosi SL, Harrison P. The contribution of ethnobiology to teaching plant sciences: student and faculty perspectives. In: Quave CL, editor. Innov Strateg Teach Plant Sci [Internet]. New York: Springer Science; 2014. p. 33–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0422-8.

  302. 302.

    Mortimer EF. Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Sci Educ. 1995;4:267–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco for admitting the first author in the doctoral program of Pós-Graduação em Etnobiologia e Conservação da Natureza; Maria Norma Ribeiro and Janaina Arandas for their teachings during the course Análise Multivariada taken by the first author, and other opportunities for discussing the results of the research with the authors; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque and André Borba for initial instructions on searching databases; and the members of Grupo de Estudos em Etnoecologia (UFRPE) for support and incentive.

Funding

Research funded with author’s own resources.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors conceptualized the study. MCS carried out the searches of the databases and the statistical analyses. All authors wrote and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Carolina Sotero.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sotero, M.C., Alves, Â.G.C., Arandas, J.K.G. et al. Local and scientific knowledge in the school context: characterization and content of published works. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 16, 23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00373-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Database searches
  • Scientometrics
  • Ethnobiology
  • Teaching-learning
  • Contextualized education
  • Multiculturalism