Skip to main content

An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the East Sepik province of Papua New Guinea



Rapid modernization in the East Sepik (ES) Province of Papua New Guinea (PNG) is resulting in a decrease in individuals knowledgeable in medicinal plant use. Here we report a synthesis and comparison of traditional medicinal plant use from four ethnically distinct locations in the ES Province and furthermore compare them to two other previous reports of traditional plant use from different provinces of PNG.


This manuscript is based on an annotated combination of four Traditional Medicines (TM) survey reports generated by University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) trainees. The surveys utilized a questionnaire titled “Information sheet on traditional herbal preparations and medicinal plants of PNG”, administered in the context of the TM survey project which is supported by WHO, US NIH and PNG governmental health care initiatives and funding. Regional and transregional comparison of medicinal plant utilization was facilitated by using existing plant databases: the UPNG TM Database and the PNG Plant Database (PNG Plants) using Bayesian statistical analysis.


Medicinal plant use between four distinct dialect study areas in the ES Province of PNG showed that only a small fraction of plants had shared use in each area, however usually utilizing different plant parts, being prepared differently and to treat different medical conditions. Several instances of previously unreported medicinal plants could be located. Medicinally under- and over-utilized plants were found both in the regional reports and in a transregional analysis, thus showing that these medicinal utilization frequencies differ between provinces.


Documentation of consistent plant use argues for efficacy and is particularly important since established and effective herbal medicinal interventions are sorely needed in the rural areas of PNG, and unfortunately clinical validation for the same is often lacking. Despite the existence of a large corpus of medical annotation of plants for PNG, previously unknown medical uses of plants can be uncovered. Furthermore, comparisons of medicinal plant utilization is possible if databases are reformatted for consistencies that allow comparisons. A concerted effort in building easily comparable databases could dramatically facilitate ethnopharmacological analysis of the existing plant diversity.


Papua New Guinea (PNG) is a largely rural country characterized by at least 800 ethnic traditions dispersed over 462,840 km2 [1, 2]. Most of the population resides in small villages, situated in diverse environs that range from montane rainforest to lowland river deltas and small tropical islands. Settled 49,000–44,000 years ago (Ivane Valley in the PNG Highlands) [3], PNG is blessed with extraordinary biological diversity and a rich but fragmented cultural tapestry of customs, art, spiritual beliefs and medicinal knowledge.

The East Sepik Province is situated in the northwest of the country bordered by the West Sepik Province (West), Madang Province (East), the Bismark Sea (North) and Enga Province (South). East Sepik (43,426 km2) is characterized by mountainous terrain to the south and west and the costal floodplain of the Sepik river, which flows west to east through the province [4]. The approximately 350,000 inhabitants have to rely on 37 health centers for provisioning health care and heavily supplement western medicines with traditional medicines (TM) [4, 5]. The 10 % mortality rate for children under 5 years reflects the difficulty of providing adequate health care in the East Sepik Province. In an effort to supplement health care with effective traditional medicins the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG), endorsed by the PNG government, struck a collaboration with the WHO to develop reliable traditional medicines (TM) and safe practices (outlined in the 2001–2010 PNG National Health Plan [6]). Part of this project includes traditional medicine surveys performed by UPNG students working in their kinship (“wantok”) communities. The data are then recorded in a proprietary database maintained at UPNG [7]. This database serves as central repository for PNG traditional medicine practices, preserving cultural traditions from many diverse communities.


The TM surveys are performed by UPNG students who are instructed on plant identification, preservation, herbal medicine use, and trained on how to administer the survey instrument entitled “Information sheet on traditional herbal preparations and medicinal plants of Papua New Guinea.” The survey questionnaire is the basis for semi-structured face-to-face interviews with healers, herbalists, birth attendants, and bone setters. Field vouchers of medicinal plants (twigs with leaves, fruits, flowers, nuts, etc.) are harvested under guidance of the healer and dried and compressed in newspapers. Photographs, descriptions and the pressed plant samples are assigned a voucher number and deposited with the UPNG Herbarium for later identification and reference [8].

The data concerning plant use are written up under supervision into student authored reports and the plant information is entered into the UPNG Traditional Medicines Database, which contains the combined data from reports generated by a decade’s work in this endeavor. It is the student reports that provide the base information for this current report.

Four student reports from the East Sepik Province representing four distinct language dialect communities have been compiled here: “Traditional Medicinal Plants and Practices in the Waskuk Hills Area of Ambunti District in East Sepik (2005)” by Dickson Andrew Kehop; “Traditional Medicine Practices in Niungweko and Kunjingini (MUL) Area of Wosera-Gawi District in East Sepik (2006)” by Boniface Kinminja; “Enthnobotanical Survey of Traditional Medicine in East Yangoru, East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea” (2004) by Graham Wavimbukie; and “Traditional Medicinal Plants and Practices in Kairiru Island East Sepik Province Papua New Guinea (2004) by Malcolm Sabak The first three reports (DK, BK and GW, respectively) are inland above the Sepik floodplain at elevations ranging from 150 to 300 m. The report from Kairiru Island is referred to as MS. The specific village communities interviewed included: Bangus and Mariawai villages (DK), Niungweko and Mul (Kunjingini 1) villages (BK); Marambanja, Saina, Ambukanja, Parina, Jawia, Mandien, Bukiendoun, Sausenduon, Hangrerak and Kiarivu villages (GW) and Rumlal, Shagur and Bou villages (MS).

A compilation of references for medicinal plants described from Papua New Guinea is currently in progress (50 references) in our lab. These references were used to determine if plants collected in the current East Sepik survey work have been previously reported for medicinal use. Comparison of this East Sepik medicinal plant report to our previous reports from Bougainville [8] and the Eastern Highlands [9] was accomplished after editing the previous two reports to match the current format, including codes for conditions treated.

Overall flora distribution data for PNG was obtained for the provinces of East Sepik, Eastern Highlands, and the autonomous region of Bougainville from the PNG Plants Database [10]. The data was imported into Microsoft Excel™, formatted and edited as necessary, then processed with standard Unix (Linux) utilities to produce a formatted list containing the plant family, genus and species (if known). Duplicated instances of plants in the list were removed. The family names were split off, sorted and processed using a Python script on a Raspberry Pi Model B ( to quantify the number of instances of each plant family cited in the list. In general, when multiple names for the same species were found, we attempted to match plant family names to the PNG Plant Database versions to allow for quantitative comparison. Statistical analysis was carried out exactly as previously described by Weckerle et al. [11] using the “beta.inv” function provided in Microsoft Excel™ to calculate the 95 % inferior and superior credible intervals for the data. Comparison of the currently reported East Sepik medical plants to the Traditional Medicines Plant Database maintained at UPNG was carried out similarly. Discrepancies in plant family names were resolved as described above, the family names were adapted to the family names in the UPNG Traditional Medicines Database; resulting in a slightly different number of plant families for the traditional plant uses reported.

Plant families which are considered overused have an inferior credible interval that lies above the superior credible interval for the regional total data. Plant families that are considerend underused have a superior credible interval below the inferior credible interval of the regional total data set distribution.

Results and discussion

East Sepik reports

The combined student reports contained 299 entries (including unidentified plants (n = 6)) from the East Sepik province of PNG. The reports collated 205 plants, of which 139 were identified to species and 66 to genus, from a total of 71 families. Three reports were from areas of estimated 150 m to 300 m elevation (DK, BK and GW voucher numbers), DK from Waskuk Hills in the center of Sepik province, and BK and GW from elevated areas of the province north of the Sepik river plain and southwest of the capital Wewak. One report (MS voucher numbers) came from an island (Kairiru Island) situated close to the coast of East Sepik. The combined dataset is presented in Table 1 for all four areas of the East Sepik province under consideration.

Table 1 Plants reported as medicinally used in 4 study areas in East Sepik Province

Shared and unique plants

We found a number of plants were reported as used in common amongst these areas. Many plants had many overlaps in use, preparation, and disease (Table 1). However, among the plants identified to species level, only four species were reported in every survey: Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br., Cassia alata L., Passiflora foetida L., and Zingiber officianale Roscoe. The number of plants unique to one or another of the four reports was surprisingly large in comparison to the previous reports [8, 9]. A total of 80 genera, of which 29 are identified to genus level and 51 to species level (see Table 2), were not shared between any of the four study areas.

Table 2 Plants not shared between the four study areas in East Sepik Province

Plant parts utilization, preparation, administration and diseases treated

In general the areas studied were similar in the relative utilization of plant parts (Fig. 1) with leaves predominating followed by bark and sap as next most common (with the exception of GW where roots were more commonly utilized than sap). The MS sample set reported a large number of young shoots/young roots stipulated for use in comparison to the other reports, where “young” was not specifically stipulated. The DK and GW reports only cited use of shoots. Only DK reported the medicinal use of nuts.

Fig. 1

Traditional plant usage pattern by plant part utilized across four study areas in East Sepik province in percentile of total for each study area; y = young

The method of preparation (Fig. 2) shows a similar pattern amongst the reports: use of succus (expressed juice) was most commonly reported, followed by decoction and direct application of the raw plant material. Usually direct application meant placing the material on a wound or skin ailment after minimal handling. Similarly all reports contain inhalation of smoke or vapor, heat treatment and cooking prior to utilization. DK reported a much higher frequency of cooking the material than the other areas. Boiling as a method of preparation was only mentioned in the MS and GW reports, while mastication (chewing) was reported in all except MS. Typically heating implies later consumption or preparation of steam for inhalation, however, in the GW report heating is a method to prepare the plant material prior to topical application (labelled HR—Heated-Rubbed). Another mode of preparation was mastication and spitting on the affected area. This was relatively common in the MS report and mentioned in the DK report, but not noted in the the other two areas. Only from the DK report is the reverse utilization of the plants reported, where in one instance Homalium foetidum (Roxb.) Benth. was utilized in a reverse-from-expected manner. In this case, the blood of the patient was placed under the bark of the tree with the expected result being a lessening of knee pain and strengthening of bones as the tree grew. This clearly implies a spiritual/magical connection of plant and patient.

Fig. 2

Method of preparation of plants for traditional medicines across four study areas in East Sepik province in percentile of total for each study area; MS = masticated then spit on affected area(s), R = raw; S = succus (crushed)

The routes of administration for plant based medicines reported by DK, BK and MS were about evenly divided between oral or topical routes (Fig. 3). The exception was the administration practices reported by GW where oral consumption outpaced topical application (3:2 ratio). Inhalation was reported only once for the DK and BK areas, and more frequently in the BW and MS areas. The lone outlier for route of administration was from the DK report in which patient material (blood) was transferred to the plant (as described above).

Fig 3

Mode of administration of plant based traditional medcines across four study areas in East Sepik province in percentile of of total for each study area; P_to_Plant = patient to plant transfer of blood

Ailments treated (Fig. 4) with plant based medicines were categorized into 28 groups, sorted according to the target site, in order to to minimize possibly uncertain medical judgements or clinical misdiagnoses. Many described symptoms can likely accurately be ascribed to their appropriate causative diseases, but in the absence of independent clinical confirmation the decision was made to present the data in as unbiased a way as possible. Therefore, the category of “SKIN” contains both infections (e.g., “Grille”) and ectoparasitism (e.g., scabies); the category “REP” contains all sort of reproductive conditions, e.g., impotence, abortion, menstrual syndromes, contraception and fertility, etc. The exception to this method of categorization is malaria, which is generally well recognized throughout the Sepik. Overall, skin conditions were most frequently treated (73 instances), with respiratory conditions (60 instances), fever (39 instances), gastrointestinal conditions (36 instances) and malaria (29 instances) rounding out the top five conditions. The top five conditions in the respective reports were: for MS (fever—19, skin—18, headache—16, respiratory and gastrointestinal—12 reports each); BK (skin—22, respiratory—15, gastrointestinal conditions—7 wounds—6, and pain −5 instances): DK (skin—16, respiratory—8, malaria and wounds—5 instances each, and fever—4 instances): GW (respiratory—25, skin and malaria—17 each, gastrointestinal conditions and fever—14 instances each). The relative frequencies of ailments/conditions are presented in Fig. 4. Outlier conditions, those reported once and not reported in the other areas were urinary conditions (incontinence, URINE; and delousing, INSECTICIDE) from the MS report; use for burn conditions (BURN), magical poisoning (MAGIC) and child health improvement (CHILD) from the DK area; and cancer (CANC) and cardiovascular condition (CV) from the GW area.

Fig. 4

Coded ailments treated with plant based traditional medicines across four study areas in East Sepik province in percentile of of total for each study area; BITE = insect or snake bite; BLOOD = hematological issues including coagulation; BONE = bone related injury or disease; CANC = cancer; CV = Cardiovascular; CHILD = childhood disease; DENT = dental disease; FEV = fever; GAST = gasteroenterological disease; HEAD = headache; INF = infection; MAGIC = disease of unidentified etiology; MAINT = health promotion, including failure to thrive; MAL = Malaria; NUT = nutritional supplement; OCC = ocular diseases; ORG = diseases thought to affect one particular organ; POIS = envenomation or poisoning; sometimes this includes transnatural causation; PSYCH = psychiatric diseases or syndromes; REP = reproductive diseases including childbirth related issues; RESP = respiratory diseases; SKIN = dermal related diseases; often includes infectious disease; SWELL = swelling of whole body or part of the body; WOUND = wound related diseases or syndromes

Most common families of plants used by healers interviewed

By far the most common genus was Ficus (11), followed by Euphorbia (7), Piper (6), Plectranthus (6), Cassia (5), Passiflora (5), and 4 instances each of: Acalypha, Alpinia, Alstonia, Calamus, Crinum, Gnetum, Laportea, Merremia, Mucuna, Phyllanthus, Syzygium, Uncaria, and Zingiber.

Lesser known medicinal plant species of East Sepik

Those plants identified to the species level and not found in the Bougainville and Eastern Highlands reports were matched against our medicinal plants of PNG reference database, consisting of historical reports largely by Holdsworth and associates. The following plants were not described in the literature which the database encompasses: Averrhoa carambola L. (BK 039/06 & DK 01/05), Campnosperma brevipetiolatum Volkens Volkens. (DK 56/05), Capsicum annuum L. (DK 15/05), Caryota mitis Lour. (DK 26/05), Cascabela thevetia (L.) Lippold (BK 028/06), Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz). Trin (MS 50/04), Clitoria ternatea L. (GW 91/04), Curcuma longa L. (BK 029/06), Cycas rumphii Miq. (BK 002/06), Endospermum labios Schodde (DK 40/05), Endospermum formicarium Becc. (GW 28/04), Endospermum medullosum L.S.Sm. (MS 89/04), Erythrina merrilliana Krukoff (GW 18/04 & MS 42/04), Hydriastele costata F.M. Bailey (GW 83/04), Intsia bijuga (Colebr.) Kuntze (DK 33/05 & GW 08/04 & MS 46/04), Millettia pinnata (L.) Panigrahi (GW 30/04), Planchonia papuana R. Knuth (DK 45/05), Riedelia corallina (K. Schum.) (DK 18/05), Schismatoglottis calyptrata (Roxb.) Zoll. & Moritzi (MS 83/04), Sterculia shillinglawii F. Muell. (GW 04/04), and Tinospora arfakiana Becc. (GW 82/04).

Capsicum annuum L. and Curcuma longa L. are commonly grown in many gardens across PNG, yet it was surprising to note the paucity of medicinal uses previously reported for PNG. Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br. (BK 020/06 & MS 26/04) also did not appear to be part of the older literature, however, it was recently found to be used in the New Britain Province where the leaves are rubbed onto the skin affected by jelly fish stings [12]. The sap is used in the BK area for respiratory ailments, and the succus from the leaves is reported by MS to be used in Kairiru for fever/pain via oral consumption.

Comparing East Sepik with Eastern highlands and Bougainville provinces

The combined dataset of the East Sepik, Eastern Highlands and Bougainville reports encompasses 276 plant genera, of which only 22 were reported in common from our other published data sets; Bougainville 112 genera, Eastern highlands 121, and East Sepik 154 genera (see Fig. 5). The frequency of shared genera is given in Table 3. The plant genera with the highest common use citations (> = 10) are Ficus sp. 29, Alpinia sp. 16, Piper sp. 15, Syzygium sp. 12 and Alstonia sp.11. The predominance of Ficus sp. is not surprising since Ficus represents a very large genus in PNG [13].

Fig. 5

Venn diagram showing the total number (n) and overlap of plant genera utilized medicinally between Bougainville, East Sepik, and Eastern Highlands provinces

Table 3 Plant Genera in common utilized in Bougainville, Eastern Highlands and East Sepik Provinces

Regional utilization of plants

Comparison of plants used medicinally in our published data sets to a general list of plants from the same regions allowed for an analysis of utilization preferences. Medicinally over- and under-represented plant families are given in Table 4, while medical plant utilization is given in Table 5. Comparison shows that the number of plant families significantly underutilized, when compared against the regional flora, breaks down as follows: in East Sepik (ES) province Poaceae are underutilized, while in the Eastern Highlands (EH) and Bougainville (BV) Orchidaceae are underutilized.

Table 4 Overrepresented and underespresented plants for each province when compared to the regional plant diversity as recorded in the PNG Plant Database
Table 5 Overrepresented and underespresented plants for each province when compared to the regional plant diversity as recorded in the UPNG Traditional Medicines Database

The number of plants overutilized varies (ES: n = 15; EH: n = 25 and BV: n = 12) but is relatively stable as percentage of plants found in the regional database at 0.66, 0.7 and 0.78 % for ES, EH and BV, respectively. East Sepik shares overutilization of Fabaceae, Gnetaceae and Zingiberaceae with Bougainville and overutilization of Asteraceae and Lamiaceae with Eastern Highlands, while Eastern Highlands and Bougainville share no overutilized plant families.

When the UPNG Traditional Medicines Database was used to assess utilization, the underrepresented plant families were the Verbenaceae in East Sepik and the Euphorbiaceae in the Eastern Highlands. No plant family met the p = 0.05 criterion in Bougainville, however, Euphorbiaceae was the top ranked underutilized plant family (data not shown). The number of overutilized plants is varied (ES: n = 4; EH: n = 17; BV: n = 12). Among the overused plant families East Sepik shared the Arecaceae with Bougainville. Several plant families reappear in this analysis, e.g., the Asteraceae and Winteraceae from the Eastern Highlands province and the Gnetaceae and Zingiberaceae in Bougainville. The statistical requirements of the comparison method resulted in some plant families appearing in the overutilization category represent a single report from the region for that plant family. This could not be avoided since the East Sepik reports are included in the UPNG Traditional Medicines Database total. As the PNG Medicinal Plant Database database grows in the future the stringency of the analysis will improve.

Traditional inspection of the information gathered yielded information about plants not widely used, poorly annotated or used for different ailments than those in locales where use of the plant is more common. Plants without annotation in the recent PNG Medicinal Plant Literature include:

Alocasia cucullata (Lour.) G. Don surprisingly did not yield any crossrefernces in the PNG database, even when using synonyms. It is used in Chinese medicine for snakebite, abscesses, rheumatism, and arthritis [14] and has recently been identified as containing anticancer compounds [15, 16].

Averrhoa carambola L. (starfruit) fruit is used for cuts and asthma in PNG, and also widely used throughout the world for a variety of ailments, seemingly only in India as antihemmoraghic [17].

Caryota mitis Lour. has no further medicinal annotation for use in PNG, but is used several Asian countries for a variety of ailments, e.g., against hemorrhoids, male sexual dysfunction, and rheumathoid arthritis in Bangladesh [17].

Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz). Trin is used in the East Sepik for swelling. The plant is used in Ayurveda as a diuretic [17, 18].

Clitoria ternatea used for infertility in PNG and similarly in Ayurveda, where fresh root juice in fresh goat milk is used for pregnancy [18], however, the plant is used for a dizzying array of conditions and ascribed activities [17].

Endospermum medullosum L.S.Sm. has been described previously as used against rheumatism [18], perhaps similar to the use against general body pain in the East Sepik.

Used as a contraceptive in the East Sepik, Erythrina merrilliana Krukoff reveals a dearth of information regarding medicinal uses. The plant is however known to produce toxic alkaloids [19].

Gnetum gnemonoides Brongn. yielded very little information as to medicinal use, but has been described to contain a variety of stilbenes [20].

Hemigraphis reptans (G. Forst.) T. Anderson ex Hemsl. is used in the East Sepik as the whole plant to treat centipede bite. The root is expressed into water to facilitate birth (speeding up delivery) on Vanuatu [21].

No medicinal use annotation was found for Hydriastele costata F.M. Bailey and therefore it may present one of the plants which is used very rarely for that purpose.

Intsia bijuga (Colebr.) Kuntze has annotations as a detoxicant and against diarrhea, toothache, adenopathy and swelling [22].

Macaranga clavata Warb. is used in East Sepik for skin infections, but has no recent mention in the literature for medicinal use. No scientific background information was located, hence this particular plant may be understudied. The same is also true for Macaranga darbyshirei Airy Shaw, used in the East Sepik as an antivenom, but not elsewhere mentioned for medicinal purposes.

Pandanus dubius Spreng. was not found to have any properly referenced medicinal annotations, but appears to have a fairly recent research record including discovery of two novel alkaloids, dubiusamines-A and dubiusamines-B [23].

Piper mestonii F.M. Bailey leaves used for fresh cuts and wounds do not seem to be described elsewhere. No biochemical investigation could be located in the Dictionary of Natural Products [24].

Planchonia papuana R. Knuth appears to be not used medicinally elsewhere. It is a timber tree and perhaps as such has not attracted attention; however, in an antiviral screen in our lab fractions from P. papuana exhibited anti-HIV activity [25].

Plectranthus parviflorus Willd., along with Plectranthus blumei (Benth). Launert, and Plectranthus myrianthus Briq. belong to a genus prominent for production of essentials oils [26] and with multiple annotations for antimicrobial activity, but do not seem to be described elsewhere in the PNG plant literature. The utilization of these plants for sores, ulcers and fresh cuts appear to be in line with the activities of chemicals found in Plectranthrus species [27].

Riedelia corallina (K. Schum.) Valeton, in the Zingiber family, is used for menstrual cramps, but seems to be otherwise undescribed for medicinal uses elsewhere.

The leaves of Schismatoglottis calyptrata (Roxb.) Zoll. & Moritzi are used in East Sepik to treat skin sores. No other mention was found in the PNG literature. The stems of Schismatoglottis calyptrata (Roxb.) Zoll. & Moritzi are however used in Chinese medicine for treatment of lumbago and arthralgia [18].

Sterculia shillinglawii F. Muell. has no previous annotation for PNG, but is known to be used in the Solomon island as a tonic and to reduce fever [18].

Tinospora arfakiana Becc. likewise lacks further medicinal descriptions from PNG and does not seem to have been studied from any other area, making it a potentially understudied plant.

Uncaria lanosa var. appendiculata (Benth.) Ridsdale was mentioned twice in the reports and in both instances to treat fever, but also gastrointestinal diseases, malaria, and malnutrition. No other mention for ethnomedical use could be located from PNG or other locales. However, a recent publication hints at a potential anti-depressant effect of ethanolic extracts of Uncaria lanosa var. appendiculata (Benth.) Ridsdale [28].

Uncaria orientalis Guillaumin, used to treat shortness of breath in the East Sepik, lacks pharmacological annotation, but has been investigated extensively biochemically [29, 30].


This report shows that in the East Sepik province of PNG the patterns of plant usage for medicinal indications is highly varied. This is true even though many of the same plants are used in ethnologically distinct regions. There is a tendancy for widely used plants to be used for multiple diseases, often with differing preparation of the parts utilized and differing modes of administration. One such example is Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. which shares only the route of administration between all areas. Regardless, plants not previously documented as being used medicinally can still be uncovered, e.g., Cascabela thevetia (L.) Lippold, a plant known to contain highly toxic cardiac glycosides [31] and Dendrocnide cordata (Warb. ex H.J.P. Winkl.) Chew cannot be found as being used medicinally, however, toxicity from leaves, which are used in East Sepik, has been documented [18].

Comparison of plant utilization across study areas can likewise uncover plants which share use. A good example is the genus Alpinia, for which gasteroenterological, respiratory and reproductive use are cited for Bougainville. In the Eastern Highlands it is used for gasteroenterological and respiratory conditions. In the East Sepik it is also usedfor respiratory conditions. Alpinia is in the ginger family, widely used culinarily and medicinally around the world, with traditional medicinal uses for several of the described symptoms.

Likewise, dissemination of knowledge of useful phytomedicinal practices amongst areas that share key flora may aid health practices in those areas. In any case, further studies and phytochemical analyses need to be completed before addition of plants to the pharmacopeia for PNG (a goal of the National Policy for Traditional Medicne in PNG). The UPNG Traditional Medicines Database, while still being populated with data, can already be utilized to show correlations and extract lead information for targeting certain plants for further study. Further enhancements and perhaps adaptation of other data sources (e.g., the PNG Plant Database with up-to-date plant nomenclature) would drive statistical discovery of medicinally neglected plant genera. It is shown here that transregional comparisons are possible, but require careful recoding of previous reports and standardization of database entries and terminology.

Analysis of frequency of use of plant families in the medical tradition points to certain biases. This can ultimately be useful in targeting plants for biochemical investigation. However, if the desired outcome of the ethnobotany endeavor is to highlight useful plants for the pharmacopeia, then finer grained data is needed in order to dissect the wealth of information gathered, (e.g. precise geographic location including environmental conditions, etc.). Annotation with biochemical information, conservation status, toxicity data would yield utility for a more diverse set of scientists. To this end the diverse efforts of PNG botany, ethnobotany, ethnopharmacology and plant conservation need to collaborate more rigorously to define useful interfaces for each other’s data needs. Nevertheless, we have been able to successfully show that medicinal plant use in terms of families utilized in the East Sepik resembles Bougainville provinces more than it does the Eastern Highlands. Future work with larger data sets will address whether such similarities are due to similarities of available flora or other causes.


  1. 1.

    Asher RE. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ethnologue. Grimes B. SIL International; Dallas: 2000. Accessed October 2015

  3. 3.

    Summerhayes GR, Leavesley M, Fairbairn A, Mandui H, Field J, Anne Ford A, et al. Human adaptation and plant use in highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 years ago. Science. 2010;330:78–81.

  4. 4.

    PNG district and provincial profiles. Available from: Accessed October 2015.

  5. 5.

    National Department of Health. National policy on traditional medicine. Waigani: National Department of Health; 2007.

  6. 6.

    Ministry of Health. National health plan 2001–2010 volume I. Port Moresby: Ministry of Health; 2000.

  7. 7.

    Rai PP. Traditional medicine in Papua New Guinea. National Capital District: University of Papua New Guinea Printery; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Waruruai J, Sipana B, Koch M, Barrows LR, Matainaho TK, Rai PP. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the Siwai and Buin Districts of the Autonomous Region of Bougainville. J Ethnopharm. 2011;138:564–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jorim RY, Korape S, Legu W, Koch M, Barrows LR, Matainaho TK, et al. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:47.

  10. 10.

    Conn BJ, Lee LL, Kiapranis, R. PNGPlants database. [] Accessed May 2014.

  11. 11.

    Weckerle CS, Cabras S, Castellanos ME, Leonti M. Quantitative methods in ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology: considering the overall flora - Hypothesis testing for over- and underused plant families with the Bayesian approach. J Ethnopharm. 2011;137:837–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Prescott TA, Kiapranis R, Maciver SK. Comparative ethnobotany and in-the-field antibacterial testing of medicinal plants used by the Bulu and inland Kaulong of Papua New Guinea. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;139:497–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lansky EP, Paavilainen HM. Figs: the genus Ficus (Traditional Herbal Medicines for Modern Times). Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Boyce PC. A review of Alocasia (Araceae: Colocasieae) for Thailand including a novel species and new species records from South-West Thailand. Thai For Bull. 2008;36:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Peng Q, Cai H, Sun X, Li X, Mo Z, Shi J. Alocasia cucullata exhibits strong antitumor effect in vivo by activating antitumor immunity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75328.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kaur A, Kamboj SS, Singh J, Saxena AK, Dhuna V. Isolation of a novel N-acetyl-D-lactosamine specific lectin from Alocasia cucullata (Schott.). Biotechnol Lett. 2005;272:1815–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    STUARTXCHANGE. Accessed Jan 2015 trough March 2015.

  18. 18.

    Johnson T. CRC ethnobotany desk reference. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Folkers K, Unna K. Erythrina alkaloids. V. Comparative curare-like potencies of species of the genus Erythrina. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1939;28:1019–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bourdy G, Walter A. Maternity and medicinal plants in Vanuatu I. The cycle of reproduction. J Ethnopharm. 1992;37:179–96.

  21. 21.

    Bourdy G, Walter A. Maternity and medicinal plants in Vanuatu I. The cycle of reproduction. J Ethnopharm. 1992;37:179–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dr. Duke’s phytochemical and ethnobotanical databases. Accessed September 2014.

  23. 23.

    Tana MA, Kitajimaa M, Kogurea N, Nonatob MG, Takayama H. Isolation and total syntheses of two new alkaloids, dubiusamines-A, and -B, from Pandanus dubius. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:3353–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dictionary of natural products. Available at Accessed September 2014.

  25. 25.

    Barrows LR, Matainaho TK, Ireland CM, Miller S, Carter GT, Bugni T, et al. Making the most of Papua New Guinea’s biodiversity: establishment of an integrated set of programs that link botanical survey with pharmacological assessment in “The Land of the Unexpected”. Pharmaceutical Biol. 2009;47:795–808.

  26. 26.

    Williams C. Medicinal plants in Australia volume 4: an Antipodean apothecary. Kenthurst: Rosenberg Publishing; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lukhoba CW, Simmonds MSJ, Paton A. Plectranthus: a review of ethnobotanical uses. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hsu LC, Ko YJ, Cheng HY, Chang CW, Lin YC, Cheng YH, et al. Antidepressant-like activity of the ethanolic extract from Uncaria lanosa Wallich var. appendiculata Ridsd in the forced swimming test and in the tail suspension test in mice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:497302. doi:10.1155/2012/497302. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

  29. 29.

    Croquelois G, Miet C, Poisson J, Sevenet T. Oxyindole alkaloids of Uncaria orientalis Guill. (Rubiaceae). Ann Pharm Fr. 1977;35:417–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Phillipson JD, Hemingway SR. Alkaloids of Uncaria attenuata, U. orientalis and U. Canescens. Phytochemistry. 1975;14:1855–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Langford SD, Boor PJ. Oleander toxicity: an examination of human and animal toxic exposures. Toxicology. 1996;109:1–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Holdsworth D. Medicinal plants of the Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. Part V. The Upper Watut. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1987;25:225–30.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Haberle S. Ethnobotany of the Tari Basin, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Biogeography & Geomorphology Department; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Holdsworth DK. Medicinal plants of Papua New Guinea. Noumea: South Pacific Commission; 1977. Technical Paper No. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hide R, Kimin M, Kora A, Kua G, Kua K. A checklist of some plants in the territory of the Sinasina Nami (Simbu Province, Papua New Guinea), with notes on their uses. Working papers in anthropology, archaeology, linguistics and Maori Studies No. 54. Auckland: Dept. Anthropology, U. Auk. Private Bag; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Holdsworth D, Rali T. A survey of medicinal plants of the Southern Highlands, Papua New Guinea. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1989;27:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Holdsworth D, Lacanienta E. Traditional medicinal plants of the Central Province of Papua New Guinea. Part II. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1981;19:155–67.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Holdsworth DK, Farnworth ER. A phytochemical survey of medicinal and poisonous plants of the Central District of Papua. Sci New Guinea. 1974;2:155–63.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Goeltenboth F, Holdsworth DK, Sakulas H, Thredgold H, Woodley E. Medicinal plants in Papua New Guinea Part I: Morobe Province. E. Woodley (Ed.). Weikersheim, Germany: Verlag Josef Margraf publiser; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Holdsworth D. Traditional medicinal plants used in the treatment of gastric ailments. PNG Med J. 1978;21:175–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Johannes A. Medicinal plants of the Nekematigi of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Econ Bot. 1975;29:268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rai PP, Matainaho T, Saulei S, Ambihaipahar U. Medicinal Plants in Papua New Guinea. Manila: WHO (World Health Organization), Western Pacific Region; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Paijmans K. New Guinea vegetation. Canberra: Australian National University Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Holdsworth DK. Some medicinal plants of the Marawaka Kukukuku people. Science in New Guinea. 1973;1:17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Holdsworth D. High altitude medicinal plants of Papua New Guinea. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1989;27:95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Holdsworth D, Lacanienta E. Traditional medicinal plants of the Central Province of Papua New Guinea. Part I. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1981;19:141–54.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Holdsworth DK, Gelege N, Close K, Close A. Some traditional medicinal plants of Papua New Guinea. Sci New Guinea. 1975;3:165–72.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Holdsworth D. Traditional medicinal. Traditional medicinal plants used in the treatment of malaria and fevers in Papua New Guinea. PNG Med J. 1975;18:142–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Holdsworth DK. Medicinal plants from Milne Bay, Eastern Papua. Sci New Guinea. 1975;3:98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hide RL. South Simbu: studies in demography, nutrition and subsistence. Research report of the Simbu land use project Vol VI. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Henty EE. Harmful plants in Papua New Guinea. Lae: Dept. of Forests; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Holdsworth DK, Tringen SB. Medicinal plants of Sepik. Sci New Guinea. 1973;1:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Telban JB. The role of medical ethnobotany in ethnomedicine: a New Guinea example. Ethnobiol. 1988;8:149–69.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Stopp K. Medicinal plants of the Mt. Hagen People (Mbowamb) in New Guinea. Econ Bot. 1963;17:16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Skingle DC. Some medicinal herbs used by the natives of New Guinea. Mankind. 1970;7:223–5.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rai P. Traditional uses of plants for health and healing in Bougainville Part 1. Madang, Papua New Guinea Traditional Health: HORIZONT3000; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Holdsworth DK. Traditional medicinal plants of the North Solomons Province Papua New Guinea. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1980;18:33–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nick A, Rali T, Sticher O. Biological screening of traditional medicinal plants from Papua New Guinea. J Ethnopharm. 1995;49:147–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Holdsworth DK, Tamanabae R, Small OR, Farnworth E. A phytochemical survey of medicinal and poisonous plants from the Northern District of Papua. Papua New Guin Sci Soc Proc. 1974;25:85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Holdsworth D. Traditional medicinal plants of Central Province PNG. Part IV. The Goilala mountain people. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1987;25:231–5.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Holdsworth DK. A phytochemical survey of medicinal plants of the D ‘Entrecasteaux Islands, Papua. Sci New Guinea. 1974;1:164–71.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Holdsworth DK, Hurley C, Rayner SE. Traditional medicinal plants of New Ireland Papua New Guinea. Pharm Biol. 1980;18:131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Holdsworth DK, Balun L. Medicinal plants of the East and West Sepik provinces, Papua New Guinea. Int J Pharmacog. 1992;30:218–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Holdsworth D, Wamoi B. Medicinal plants of the Admiralty Islands, Papua, New Guinea. Part 1. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1982;20:169–81.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Holdswort DK, Balun L. Ethnomedicine of the gulf province of Papua New Guinea Part I: The mountains around Kanabea and Kaintiba. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1988;26:51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Blackwood B. Use of plants among the Kukukuku of Southeast-Central New Guinea. Proc Sixth Pac Sci Congress Pac Sci Assoc. 1939;4:111–26.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Holdsworth DK, Damas K. Medicinal plants of Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. III. The Finschhafen coast. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1986;24:217–25.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Holdsworth DK. Phytomedicine of the Gazelle Peninsula, New Britain. Sci New Guinea. 1975;3:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Holdsworth D, Kerenga K. Medicinal plants of the Western Highlands, Papua New Guinea New Guinea. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1987;25:171–6.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Blackwood B. Treatment of the sick in the Solomon Islands. Folklore. 1935;46:148–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sillitoe P. An ethnobotanical account of the plant resources of the Wola region, Southern Highlands Province. Papua New Guinea J Ethnobiol. 1995;15:201–35.

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Holdsworth D, Giheno J. A preliminary survey of highland medicinal plants. Sci New Guinea. 1975;3:191–8.

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Holdsworth D. Traditional medicinal plants of Central Province PNG. Part III. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1987;25:103–12.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Holdsworth D, Kerenga KA. A survey of medicinal plants in the Simbu Province, Papua New Guinea. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1987;25:183–7.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Holdsworth D, Sakulas H. High altitude medicinal plants of Papua New Guinea. Part II, Mount Wilhelm, Simbu Province. Int J Pharmacog. 1992;30:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Holdsworth DK, Longley RP. Some medicinal and poisonous plants from the Southern Highlands District of Papua. Proc Papua New Guinea Scient Soc. 1972;24:21–4.

  77. 77.

    Holdsworth D, Sakulas H. Medicinal plants of the Morobe Province Part ll. The Aseki Valley. Int J Crude Drug Res. 1986;24:31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Holdsworth DK, Heers G. Some medicinal and poisonous plants from the Trobriand Islands. Rec Papua New Guinea Mus. 1971;1:37–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The reports compiled in this manuscript were “The Traditional Medicinal Plants and Practices in the Waskuk Hills Area of Ambunti District in the East Sepik Province”by Dickson Andrew Kehop (2005), “Ethnobotanical Survey of Traditional Medicine in the East Yangoru, East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea” by Graham Wavimbukie (2004), “Traditional Medicine Practices in Niungweko: I and Kunjingini (Mul) Areas of the Wosera-Gawi District in East Sepik” by Boniface Kinminja (2006) and “Traditional Medicinal Plants and Practices in Kairiru Island East Sepik Province Papua New Guinea” by Malcom Sabak (2004) Many locally recognized helears contributed to this work: Isaac Hames, Lamech Mesung, Joshua Matambopi, Lillian Nenipa, Evelyn John, Rebecca Waikola, Zippora Gamba and John Wekuai (DK), Ms. Yakupa, Stanley Wingewi, Chris Tapukata, Doughlas Yandu, Adam Knokrakundi, Bill Saun, Ambrose Ganjal, Mr. Yakop and Mr. Paliak (BK), Simon Parimie, Lawrence Parimie, Arnold Sauseha, Freddy Kavi, Nancy Kavi, Camillus Waranaka, Columba Waranaka, Wally Nangusimbie, Andrew Hipanare, Alphonsa Humunda, Paul Hahiva, Jacob Kwale John Pavuhau, Agnes Niniehau and John Nimiehau (GW), Wow B. Woyeng, Wow J. Samiek, Wow P. Wilbarau, Wow Wapsi, Wow Kaisem, Brata Rammy N., Wow Sareo, Wow Takswau, Mr. and Mrs Tambuna August, Wow Temos, Ms. Vero T. and Ms. Sumin K (MS).

We also acknowledge UPNG and FRI Herbarium staff for assistance in identification of medicinal plant vouchers. This work was funded by US NIH support through the Fogarty International Center, ICBG 5UO1T006671, and the Wheeler Foundation through Wells Fargo, UT. Dr. Rai, Dr. Matainaho and students had additional support from by the National Department of Health, Papua New Guinea and the University of Papua New Guinea.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis R. Barrows.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MK wrote the manuscript and prepared statistical data and analysis. LRB wrote and edited the manuscript. KMB prepared ethnobotanical data sets for use in the manuscript. DAK, GW, BK, and MS performed interviews and wrote reports under guidance of PPR and TM who also reviewd the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Dickson Andrew Kehop deceased.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koch, M., Kehop, D.A., Kinminja, B. et al. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the East Sepik province of Papua New Guinea. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 11, 79 (2015).

Download citation


  • Papua New Guinea
  • East Sepik
  • Medicinal plants
  • Bougainville
  • Eastern highlands
  • Quantitative ethnopharmacology